首页 > 最新文献

Infection, disease & health最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluation of the influenza-like illness case definition and the acute respiratory infection case definition in the diagnosis of influenza and COVID-19 in healthcare personnel. 评估医护人员在诊断流感和 COVID-19 时采用的流感样病例定义和急性呼吸道感染病例定义。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.002
Helena C Maltezou, Flora Sourri, Nikolaos Lemonakis, Amalia Karapanou, Theodoros V Giannouchos, Maria N Gamaletsou, Dimitra-Maria Koukou, Kyriakos Souliotis, Athanasia Lourida, Periklis Panagopoulos, Dimitrios Hatzigeorgiou, Nikolaos V Sipsas

Background: To evaluate the influenza-like illness (ILI) and acute respiratory infection (ARI) case definitions in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and influenza in healthcare personnel (HCP).

Methods: We followed a cohort of 5752 HCP from November 2022 to May 2023. Symptomatic HCP were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza by real-time PCR and/or rapid antigen detection test. ILI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 systemic symptom and ≥1 respiratory symptom. ARI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 respiratory symptom. Patients with respiratory symptoms were grouped either as ILI or as ARI based on the presence of fever, malaise, headache and/or myalgia.

Results: Overall, 466 ILI cases and 383 ARI cases occurred. HCP with ILI had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 22.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.23-78.04] to be diagnosed with influenza. HCP with ARI had an aOR of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.88-3.88) to be diagnosed with COVID-19. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of ILI for influenza were 96.6%, 49.9%, 18.2%, and 99.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ARI for COVID-19 were 51.7%, 73.6%, 84.9%, and 34.8%, respectively. ILI and ARI had an overall correct classification rate of 89.6% and 74.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our findings support the use of both ILI and ARI case definitions in the diagnosis of influenza and COVID-19 in HCP.

背景:评估医护人员在诊断 COVID-19 和流感时对流感样疾病(ILI)和急性呼吸道感染(ARI)病例的定义:评估医护人员(HCP)在诊断COVID-19和流感时的流感样疾病(ILI)和急性呼吸道感染(ARI)病例定义:方法:我们从 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 5 月对 5752 名医护人员进行了追踪调查。通过实时 PCR 和/或快速抗原检测试验对有症状的医护人员进行了 SARS-CoV-2 和流感检测。ILI定义为突然出现≥1种全身症状和≥1种呼吸道症状。ARI是指突然出现≥1种呼吸道症状。根据发热、乏力、头痛和/或肌痛的存在情况,将有呼吸道症状的患者归为 ILI 或 ARI:总共有 466 例 ILI 和 383 例 ARI。患流感性咽喉炎的住院病人被诊断为流感的调整赔率(aOR)为 22.05 [95%置信区间(CI):6.23-78.04]。患有急性呼吸道感染的人类接触者被诊断为 COVID-19 的 aOR 为 2.70(95% 置信区间:1.88-3.88)。流感 ILI 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 96.6%、49.9%、18.2% 和 99.2%。COVID-19对ARI的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为51.7%、73.6%、84.9%和34.8%。ILI和ARI的总体分类正确率分别为89.6%和74.1%:我们的研究结果支持使用 ILI 和 ARI 病例定义来诊断高危人群中的流感和 COVID-19。
{"title":"Evaluation of the influenza-like illness case definition and the acute respiratory infection case definition in the diagnosis of influenza and COVID-19 in healthcare personnel.","authors":"Helena C Maltezou, Flora Sourri, Nikolaos Lemonakis, Amalia Karapanou, Theodoros V Giannouchos, Maria N Gamaletsou, Dimitra-Maria Koukou, Kyriakos Souliotis, Athanasia Lourida, Periklis Panagopoulos, Dimitrios Hatzigeorgiou, Nikolaos V Sipsas","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the influenza-like illness (ILI) and acute respiratory infection (ARI) case definitions in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and influenza in healthcare personnel (HCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed a cohort of 5752 HCP from November 2022 to May 2023. Symptomatic HCP were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza by real-time PCR and/or rapid antigen detection test. ILI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 systemic symptom and ≥1 respiratory symptom. ARI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 respiratory symptom. Patients with respiratory symptoms were grouped either as ILI or as ARI based on the presence of fever, malaise, headache and/or myalgia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 466 ILI cases and 383 ARI cases occurred. HCP with ILI had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 22.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.23-78.04] to be diagnosed with influenza. HCP with ARI had an aOR of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.88-3.88) to be diagnosed with COVID-19. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of ILI for influenza were 96.6%, 49.9%, 18.2%, and 99.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ARI for COVID-19 were 51.7%, 73.6%, 84.9%, and 34.8%, respectively. ILI and ARI had an overall correct classification rate of 89.6% and 74.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support the use of both ILI and ARI case definitions in the diagnosis of influenza and COVID-19 in HCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prediction of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR) hospital-acquired infection (HAI) and colonisation: A systematic review. 耐多药细菌(MDR)医院获得性感染(HAI)和定植的预测:系统综述。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.003
Leila Figueiredo Dantas, Igor Tona Peres, Bianca Brandão de Paula Antunes, Leonardo S L Bastos, Silvio Hamacher, Pedro Kurtz, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Fernando Augusto Bozza

Background: Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAI) represent a public health priority in most countries worldwide. Our main objective was to systematically review the quality of the predictive modeling literature regarding multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).

Methods: We conducted and reported a Systematic Literature Review according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. We analysed the quality of the articles in terms of adherence to the TRIPOD checklist.

Results: The initial search identified 1935 papers and 15 final articles were included in the review. Most studies analysed used traditional prediction models (logistic regression), and only three developed machine-learning techniques. We noted poor adherence to the main methodological issues recommended in the TRIPOD checklist to develop prediction models, such as handling missing data (20% adherence), model-building procedures (20% adherence), assessing model performance (47% adherence), and reporting performance measures (33% adherence).

Conclusions: Our review found few studies that use efficient alternatives to predict the acquisition of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in ICUs. Furthermore, we noted a lack of strategies for dealing with missing data, feature selection, and imbalanced datasets, a common problem in HAI studies.

背景:医院获得性感染(HAI)是全球大多数国家的公共卫生重点。我们的主要目的是系统回顾有关重症监护病房(ICU)中耐多药革兰氏阴性菌的预测模型文献的质量:我们按照 PRISMA 声明的建议进行了系统性文献综述并进行了报告。我们根据 TRIPOD 核对表分析了文章的质量:初步检索发现了 1935 篇论文,最终有 15 篇文章被纳入综述。大多数分析研究使用了传统的预测模型(逻辑回归),只有三项研究开发了机器学习技术。我们注意到,在开发预测模型时,对TRIPOD核对表中建议的主要方法问题的遵守情况较差,如处理缺失数据(遵守率为20%)、模型建立程序(遵守率为20%)、评估模型性能(遵守率为47%)和报告性能指标(遵守率为33%):我们的综述发现,很少有研究使用有效的替代方法来预测重症监护病房中耐多药革兰氏阴性菌的感染情况。此外,我们还注意到缺乏处理缺失数据、特征选择和不平衡数据集的策略,而这是HAI研究中的一个常见问题。
{"title":"Prediction of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR) hospital-acquired infection (HAI) and colonisation: A systematic review.","authors":"Leila Figueiredo Dantas, Igor Tona Peres, Bianca Brandão de Paula Antunes, Leonardo S L Bastos, Silvio Hamacher, Pedro Kurtz, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Fernando Augusto Bozza","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAI) represent a public health priority in most countries worldwide. Our main objective was to systematically review the quality of the predictive modeling literature regarding multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted and reported a Systematic Literature Review according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. We analysed the quality of the articles in terms of adherence to the TRIPOD checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 1935 papers and 15 final articles were included in the review. Most studies analysed used traditional prediction models (logistic regression), and only three developed machine-learning techniques. We noted poor adherence to the main methodological issues recommended in the TRIPOD checklist to develop prediction models, such as handling missing data (20% adherence), model-building procedures (20% adherence), assessing model performance (47% adherence), and reporting performance measures (33% adherence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review found few studies that use efficient alternatives to predict the acquisition of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in ICUs. Furthermore, we noted a lack of strategies for dealing with missing data, feature selection, and imbalanced datasets, a common problem in HAI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"50-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burkholderia cenocepacia outbreak linked to taps in a neonatal intensive care unit. 与新生儿重症监护病房水龙头有关的结核杆菌爆发。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.001
R Purcell, S Ryan, J Meyer, K Cisera, N L Sherry, A Stewart, A Rindt, T M Korman, R L Stuart

Background: Burkholderia cenocepacia complex is an important cause of hospital acquired infections. We describe the management of an outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) due to tap colonisation.

Methods: Microbiological testing of touch (n = 26) and non-touch taps (n = 28), sinks and drains, including genomic sequencing of selected isolates. Thermal shocking of taps with 30 min of water flush at 60 °C. Tap aerators were changed with each thermal shock. Adjuvant disinfecting measures were applied to aerator mesh at the water exit point of the tap, point-of-use water filters, drains and sinks using hospital grade chlorine-based detergent.

Results: Across the 2 year outbreak, seven microbiological cultures of tap outlets were positive for B. cenocepacia. Two neonates had positive stool samples, and one neonate with gastroschisis had a bloodstream infection. Phylogenetic analysis determined the clinical and tap cultures positive for B. cenocepacia were genomically closely related. Monthly thermal shocking with adjunct disinfection measures and tap aerator changes was effective in controlling tap colonisation with longer intervals associated with positive tap B. cenocepacia cultures.

Conclusions: B. cenocepacia is an important cause of hospital-acquired infection in neonates. Plumbing and tap design is an important component to consider in the build of new NICUs.

背景:结核杆菌复合体是医院获得性感染的重要原因。我们描述了在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)暴发的管理,由于水龙头定植。方法:对26个接触式和28个非接触式水龙头、水槽和排水管进行微生物学检测,并对筛选出的分离菌株进行基因组测序。在60°C条件下,用水冲洗30分钟后对水龙头进行热冲击。每次热冲击时都要更换水龙头曝气器。使用医院级含氯洗涤剂对水龙头出水点的曝气网、使用点的水过滤器、排水管和水槽采取辅助消毒措施。结果:在2年的暴发中,有7个自来水口微生物培养呈青绿杆菌阳性。两名新生儿粪便样本呈阳性,一名胃裂新生儿血液感染。系统发育分析表明,临床培养物和结核分枝杆菌培养物在基因组上密切相关。每月进行热休克,辅以消毒措施和更换水龙头曝气设备,可有效控制水龙头定植,间隔时间越长,水龙头中青绿芽孢杆菌培养阳性。结论:新生儿结核杆菌是新生儿医院获得性感染的重要原因。管道和水龙头的设计是一个重要的组成部分,要考虑在新的新生儿重症监护病房的建设。
{"title":"Burkholderia cenocepacia outbreak linked to taps in a neonatal intensive care unit.","authors":"R Purcell, S Ryan, J Meyer, K Cisera, N L Sherry, A Stewart, A Rindt, T M Korman, R L Stuart","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burkholderia cenocepacia complex is an important cause of hospital acquired infections. We describe the management of an outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) due to tap colonisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Microbiological testing of touch (n = 26) and non-touch taps (n = 28), sinks and drains, including genomic sequencing of selected isolates. Thermal shocking of taps with 30 min of water flush at 60 °C. Tap aerators were changed with each thermal shock. Adjuvant disinfecting measures were applied to aerator mesh at the water exit point of the tap, point-of-use water filters, drains and sinks using hospital grade chlorine-based detergent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 2 year outbreak, seven microbiological cultures of tap outlets were positive for B. cenocepacia. Two neonates had positive stool samples, and one neonate with gastroschisis had a bloodstream infection. Phylogenetic analysis determined the clinical and tap cultures positive for B. cenocepacia were genomically closely related. Monthly thermal shocking with adjunct disinfection measures and tap aerator changes was effective in controlling tap colonisation with longer intervals associated with positive tap B. cenocepacia cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>B. cenocepacia is an important cause of hospital-acquired infection in neonates. Plumbing and tap design is an important component to consider in the build of new NICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142900719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Credentialling in Australia for infection prevention and control: Philosophy, principles and practice. 澳大利亚的感染预防与控制认证:理念、原则和实践。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.007
Deborough Macbeth, Catherine Viengkham, Ramon Z Shaban

Infection prevention and control programs are vital to ensuring the health and wellbeing of healthcare consumers and staff. Infection control professionals who lead these programs are uniquely positioned with the knowledge, skills and attributes to direct effective infection control practices and policies within their healthcare setting. As with many specialisations, these individuals may choose to undertake a credentialling process, where their expertise and competence are evaluated and formally recognised by a professional body. Globally, there is growing evidence that credentialling improves the standard of practice of infection control professionals, and achieves beneficial outcomes for staff, patients and the broader healthcare systems in which they operate. In Australia, credentialling is a relatively new endeavour emerging in the mid 1990s with the rapidly evolving profile of the infection control professional. In this paper, we detail the history and evolution of credentialling of the infection control professionals in Australia. We also appraise the current three-tier credentialling framework, including its underlying philosophy, how it distinguishes between 'competence' and 'capability', the mechanisms it provides for career development, and its adaptation in response to critical contemporary developments in the field of infection control in Australia, including the expanding diversity of contemporary practice.

感染预防和控制计划对于确保医疗保健消费者和员工的健康和福祉至关重要。领导这些计划的感染控制专业人员具有独特的知识、技能和特质,能够在其所在的医疗机构内指导有效的感染控制实践和政策。与许多专业一样,这些专业人员可以选择进行资格认证,由专业机构对他们的专业知识和能力进行评估和正式认可。在全球范围内,越来越多的证据表明,资格认证提高了感染控制专业人员的执业标准,并为员工、患者和他们所在的更广泛的医疗保健系统带来了有益的结果。在澳大利亚,认证是 20 世纪 90 年代中期随着感染控制专业人员的迅速发展而出现的一项相对较新的工作。在本文中,我们将详细介绍澳大利亚感染控制专业人员资格认证的历史和演变。我们还评估了当前的三级资格认证框架,包括其基本理念、如何区分 "能力 "与 "才干"、为职业发展提供的机制,以及为应对澳大利亚感染控制领域的重要当代发展(包括不断扩大的当代实践多样性)而进行的调整。
{"title":"Credentialling in Australia for infection prevention and control: Philosophy, principles and practice.","authors":"Deborough Macbeth, Catherine Viengkham, Ramon Z Shaban","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infection prevention and control programs are vital to ensuring the health and wellbeing of healthcare consumers and staff. Infection control professionals who lead these programs are uniquely positioned with the knowledge, skills and attributes to direct effective infection control practices and policies within their healthcare setting. As with many specialisations, these individuals may choose to undertake a credentialling process, where their expertise and competence are evaluated and formally recognised by a professional body. Globally, there is growing evidence that credentialling improves the standard of practice of infection control professionals, and achieves beneficial outcomes for staff, patients and the broader healthcare systems in which they operate. In Australia, credentialling is a relatively new endeavour emerging in the mid 1990s with the rapidly evolving profile of the infection control professional. In this paper, we detail the history and evolution of credentialling of the infection control professionals in Australia. We also appraise the current three-tier credentialling framework, including its underlying philosophy, how it distinguishes between 'competence' and 'capability', the mechanisms it provides for career development, and its adaptation in response to critical contemporary developments in the field of infection control in Australia, including the expanding diversity of contemporary practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"61-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improvement in antibacterial use in intensive care units from Argentina: A quality improvement collaborative process evaluation using Normalization Process Theory. 改善阿根廷重症监护病房的抗菌药物使用情况:使用规范化过程理论进行质量改进协作过程评估。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.003
Javier Roberti, Juan Pedro Alonso, Natalí Ini, Cecilia Loudet, Wanda Cornistein, Inés Suárez-Anzorena, Marina Guglielmino, Ana Paula Rodríguez, Ezequiel García-Elorrio, Facundo Jorro-Barón, Viviana M Rodríguez

Background: Healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic resistance worsen globally. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) aim to optimise infection treatment and curb resistance, yet implementation hurdles persist. This study examined ASP challenges in ICUs.

Methods: This study employed a qualitative methodological design to evaluate the implementation process of an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in eight intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) were conducted. Interviews were analysed guided by Normalisation Process Theory, examining coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring constructs.

Results: Key challenges included insufficient human resources, lack of institutional support, and resistance to change, particularly among staff not initially involved in the study. Despite these challenges, the program saw partial success in improving ICU practices, particularly in antibiotic use and communication across departments. The main strategy implemented in this quality improvement collaborative was the use of improvement cycles, which served as the central component for driving change. However, participation in improvement cycles was inconsistent, and sustainability post-intervention remains uncertain due to workload pressures and the need for continuous education. Concerns about workload and communication barriers persisted. Many participants did not perceive training as a separate component, which led to low engagement. Resistance to change became evident during modifications to clinical guidelines. The intervention had a positive impact on various processes, including communication and record keeping.

Conclusion: This study underscores the persistent challenges in implementing ASPs in healthcare, emphasising the need for enhanced collaboration, workforce capacity building, and evidence-based practices to overcome barriers and optimize antimicrobial use to improve patient outcomes.

背景:全球医疗相关感染和抗生素耐药性日益严重。抗生素监管计划(ASP)旨在优化感染治疗和遏制耐药性,但实施过程中仍存在障碍。本研究探讨了在重症监护病房实施抗生素管理计划所面临的挑战:本研究采用定性方法学设计,对阿根廷八家重症监护病房(ICU)的抗生素监管计划(ASP)实施过程进行评估。研究人员对医护人员(HCWs)进行了 34 次半结构式访谈。访谈以规范化过程理论(Normalisation Process Theory)为指导进行分析,考察了一致性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监控等建构因素:主要挑战包括人力资源不足、缺乏机构支持以及对变革的抵制,尤其是最初未参与研究的员工。尽管面临这些挑战,但该计划在改善重症监护室的实践方面取得了部分成功,尤其是在抗生素使用和跨部门沟通方面。该质量改进合作项目实施的主要策略是使用改进周期,这是推动变革的核心组成部分。然而,参与改进周期的情况并不一致,而且由于工作量压力和持续教育的需要,干预后的可持续性仍不确定。对工作量和沟通障碍的担忧依然存在。许多参与者不认为培训是一个单独的组成部分,这导致参与度低。在修改临床指南的过程中,对变革的抵触情绪十分明显。干预措施对各种流程产生了积极影响,包括沟通和记录保存:本研究强调了在医疗保健领域实施 ASP 所面临的长期挑战,强调需要加强合作、劳动力能力建设和循证实践,以克服障碍并优化抗菌药物的使用,从而改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Improvement in antibacterial use in intensive care units from Argentina: A quality improvement collaborative process evaluation using Normalization Process Theory.","authors":"Javier Roberti, Juan Pedro Alonso, Natalí Ini, Cecilia Loudet, Wanda Cornistein, Inés Suárez-Anzorena, Marina Guglielmino, Ana Paula Rodríguez, Ezequiel García-Elorrio, Facundo Jorro-Barón, Viviana M Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic resistance worsen globally. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) aim to optimise infection treatment and curb resistance, yet implementation hurdles persist. This study examined ASP challenges in ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a qualitative methodological design to evaluate the implementation process of an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in eight intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) were conducted. Interviews were analysed guided by Normalisation Process Theory, examining coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key challenges included insufficient human resources, lack of institutional support, and resistance to change, particularly among staff not initially involved in the study. Despite these challenges, the program saw partial success in improving ICU practices, particularly in antibiotic use and communication across departments. The main strategy implemented in this quality improvement collaborative was the use of improvement cycles, which served as the central component for driving change. However, participation in improvement cycles was inconsistent, and sustainability post-intervention remains uncertain due to workload pressures and the need for continuous education. Concerns about workload and communication barriers persisted. Many participants did not perceive training as a separate component, which led to low engagement. Resistance to change became evident during modifications to clinical guidelines. The intervention had a positive impact on various processes, including communication and record keeping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the persistent challenges in implementing ASPs in healthcare, emphasising the need for enhanced collaboration, workforce capacity building, and evidence-based practices to overcome barriers and optimize antimicrobial use to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arterial catheter outcomes in intensive care: An analysis of 1117 patients. 重症监护中动脉导管的效果:对 1117 名患者的分析。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.006
Samantha Keogh, Emily Larsen, Amanda Corley, Mari Takashima, Nicole Marsh, Melannie Edwards, Heather Reynolds, Jayesh Dhanani, Fiona Coyer, Kevin B Laupland, Claire M Rickard

Background: Access to arterial circulation through arterial catheters (ACs) is crucial for monitoring and decision-making in intensive care units (ICU) but carries the risk of complications including bloodstream infection (BSI).

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from four randomised controlled trials in Australian ICUs, investigating the efficacy of different AC interventions. De-identified data were combined into a single dataset, and per-patient outcomes analysed. The primary outcome was AC-BSI, defined as laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI) type 1 or 2, with a concurrent local infection. All-cause AC failure was defined as any unplanned removal. AC infection and failure were reported as rates per 1000 catheter days and hours.

Results: Data from 1117 adult patients were analysed. Mean age was 58.8 years (±16.6); and 41% (n = 462) were male. Median AC dwell time was 110 h (IQR 28.3-168.0). There was one case (<0.1%; 0.18/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.03-1.29]) of AC-BSI, and 14 cases of LCBI (1%; 13 LCBI-1 and 1 LCBI-2; 2.54/1000 catheter days [95% CI 1.51-4.30]). LCBI were most commonly Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. There were four cases of local infection (<1%; 0.73/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.27-1.94]). Overall AC failure rate was 13% (n = 146) or 26.53/1000 catheter days (95% CI 22.56-31.20).

Conclusion: This study identified a relatively low incidence of complications. This is likely reflective of poor monitoring of ACs in intensive care. Better surveillance and a rigorous prospective evaluation of AC outcomes is required to understand the true risk ACs pose to critically ill patients.

背景:通过动脉导管(AC)进入动脉循环对重症监护病房(ICU)的监测和决策至关重要,但也存在包括血流感染(BSI)在内的并发症风险:我们对澳大利亚重症监护病房的四项随机对照试验数据进行了二次分析,研究了不同 AC 干预措施的疗效。去身份化数据合并成一个数据集,并对每位患者的结果进行分析。主要结果是 AC-BSI,定义为实验室确诊的 1 型或 2 型血流感染(LCBI),同时伴有局部感染。全因 AC 失败定义为任何非计划性切除。导管感染率和失败率以每 1000 个导管天数和小时数为单位进行报告:结果:分析了 1117 名成年患者的数据。平均年龄为 58.8 岁 (±16.6);男性占 41% (n = 462)。中位 AC 停留时间为 110 小时(IQR 28.3-168.0)。有一个病例(结论:这项研究发现并发症的发生率相对较低。这可能反映出重症监护中对空调的监控不力。要了解空调对重症患者造成的真正风险,需要对空调的结果进行更好的监控和严格的前瞻性评估。
{"title":"Arterial catheter outcomes in intensive care: An analysis of 1117 patients.","authors":"Samantha Keogh, Emily Larsen, Amanda Corley, Mari Takashima, Nicole Marsh, Melannie Edwards, Heather Reynolds, Jayesh Dhanani, Fiona Coyer, Kevin B Laupland, Claire M Rickard","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to arterial circulation through arterial catheters (ACs) is crucial for monitoring and decision-making in intensive care units (ICU) but carries the risk of complications including bloodstream infection (BSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from four randomised controlled trials in Australian ICUs, investigating the efficacy of different AC interventions. De-identified data were combined into a single dataset, and per-patient outcomes analysed. The primary outcome was AC-BSI, defined as laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI) type 1 or 2, with a concurrent local infection. All-cause AC failure was defined as any unplanned removal. AC infection and failure were reported as rates per 1000 catheter days and hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1117 adult patients were analysed. Mean age was 58.8 years (±16.6); and 41% (n = 462) were male. Median AC dwell time was 110 h (IQR 28.3-168.0). There was one case (<0.1%; 0.18/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.03-1.29]) of AC-BSI, and 14 cases of LCBI (1%; 13 LCBI-1 and 1 LCBI-2; 2.54/1000 catheter days [95% CI 1.51-4.30]). LCBI were most commonly Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. There were four cases of local infection (<1%; 0.73/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.27-1.94]). Overall AC failure rate was 13% (n = 146) or 26.53/1000 catheter days (95% CI 22.56-31.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified a relatively low incidence of complications. This is likely reflective of poor monitoring of ACs in intensive care. Better surveillance and a rigorous prospective evaluation of AC outcomes is required to understand the true risk ACs pose to critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of peripheral venous catheters microbiota and its association with phlebitis. 评估外周静脉导管微生物群及其与静脉炎的关系。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.005
Gustavo Francisco Lopes, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira, Rachel Maciel Monteiro, Pedro Castania Amadio Domingues, Felipe Lazarini Bim, Lucas Lazarini Bim, Gabriela Bassi Ferreira da Silva, André Pereira Dos Santos, Cássio do Nascimento, Denise de Andrade, Evandro Watanabe

Background: Peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) remain the primary mode of short-term venous access for managing intravenous fluid, obtaining blood samples, and peripheral parenteral nutrition. They may get contaminated and require regular monitoring to prevent complications. This study evaluated the occurrence of phlebitis and its associated-clinical and microbiological indicators.

Methods: The frequency of phlebitis was evaluated in hospitalized patients of both medical and surgical fields. Subsequently, the dichotomous association between the presence of phlebitis and the clinical aspects was investigated. In parallel, the bacterial contamination of PVCs was assessed through culture-based methods, microscopy observation, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Results: Approximately one in four patients presented phlebitis (28.4%). The most frequent symptom was erythema at access site, with or without pain, corresponding to Score 1 on the phlebitis scale (17.9%). Colonization of both lumen and external surface of PVC was observed in 31.3% of the samples. Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were the most isolated bacterial genera on the PVC surface. No significant association was observed between the presence of phlebitis and the clinical aspects, as well as the presence of microorganisms.

Conclusion: Microorganism were present on both internal and external PVC surface, without being associated to phlebitis.

背景:外周静脉导管(PVC)仍然是管理静脉输液、获取血液样本和外周肠外营养的主要短期静脉通路模式。它们可能会受到污染,需要定期监测以预防并发症。本研究评估了静脉炎的发生率及其相关的临床和微生物指标:方法:对内科和外科住院患者的静脉炎发生频率进行评估。方法:对内科和外科住院病人的静脉炎发生率进行了评估,随后研究了静脉炎的存在与临床方面的二分法关系。同时,还通过培养方法、显微镜观察和 16S rRNA 基因测序评估了 PVC 的细菌污染情况:结果:大约每四名患者中就有一名出现静脉炎(28.4%)。最常见的症状是通路部位出现红斑,伴有或不伴有疼痛,相当于静脉炎量表中的 1 分(17.9%)。在 31.3% 的样本中,PVC 管腔和外表面都出现了菌落。葡萄球菌和假单胞菌是 PVC 表面分离出的最多细菌属。静脉炎的存在与临床表现以及微生物的存在之间并无明显关联:结论:PVC内外表面均存在微生物,但与静脉炎无关。
{"title":"Assessment of peripheral venous catheters microbiota and its association with phlebitis.","authors":"Gustavo Francisco Lopes, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira, Rachel Maciel Monteiro, Pedro Castania Amadio Domingues, Felipe Lazarini Bim, Lucas Lazarini Bim, Gabriela Bassi Ferreira da Silva, André Pereira Dos Santos, Cássio do Nascimento, Denise de Andrade, Evandro Watanabe","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) remain the primary mode of short-term venous access for managing intravenous fluid, obtaining blood samples, and peripheral parenteral nutrition. They may get contaminated and require regular monitoring to prevent complications. This study evaluated the occurrence of phlebitis and its associated-clinical and microbiological indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The frequency of phlebitis was evaluated in hospitalized patients of both medical and surgical fields. Subsequently, the dichotomous association between the presence of phlebitis and the clinical aspects was investigated. In parallel, the bacterial contamination of PVCs was assessed through culture-based methods, microscopy observation, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately one in four patients presented phlebitis (28.4%). The most frequent symptom was erythema at access site, with or without pain, corresponding to Score 1 on the phlebitis scale (17.9%). Colonization of both lumen and external surface of PVC was observed in 31.3% of the samples. Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were the most isolated bacterial genera on the PVC surface. No significant association was observed between the presence of phlebitis and the clinical aspects, as well as the presence of microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microorganism were present on both internal and external PVC surface, without being associated to phlebitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141899239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sustainability and novel technologies to improve environmental cleaning in healthcare - Implications and considerations. 改善医疗环境清洁的可持续性和新技术--影响和考虑因素。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.002
S Jain, K Dempsey, K Clezy, B G Mitchell, M A Kiernan

Along with emerging technologies electrolysed water (EW) systems have been proposed for cleaning and/or disinfection in clinical areas. There is evidence for the use of EW in food-handling and the dairy industry however there is lack of evidence for EW as an effective cleaning and disinfecting agent in a clinical setting. Existing publications mostly are either laboratory based or from non-clinical settings. This is in direct contrast to other approaches used in healthcare cleaning. The aim of this paper is to provide infection prevention and control professionals with a risk assessment checklist using an evaluation of electrolysed water as an example of the analysis and consideration required prior to the introduction of any new technology and, in particular, the inclusion of sustainability.

随着新兴技术的发展,电解水(EW)系统已被提议用于临床区域的清洁和/或消毒。有证据表明,电解水可用于食品处理和乳品业,但缺乏证据表明电解水是临床环境中有效的清洁和消毒剂。现有出版物大多基于实验室或非临床环境。这与医疗清洁中使用的其他方法形成了鲜明对比。本文旨在为感染预防和控制专业人员提供一份风险评估清单,以电解水的评估为例,说明在引入任何新技术之前需要进行的分析和考虑,特别是要考虑到可持续性。
{"title":"Sustainability and novel technologies to improve environmental cleaning in healthcare - Implications and considerations.","authors":"S Jain, K Dempsey, K Clezy, B G Mitchell, M A Kiernan","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Along with emerging technologies electrolysed water (EW) systems have been proposed for cleaning and/or disinfection in clinical areas. There is evidence for the use of EW in food-handling and the dairy industry however there is lack of evidence for EW as an effective cleaning and disinfecting agent in a clinical setting. Existing publications mostly are either laboratory based or from non-clinical settings. This is in direct contrast to other approaches used in healthcare cleaning. The aim of this paper is to provide infection prevention and control professionals with a risk assessment checklist using an evaluation of electrolysed water as an example of the analysis and consideration required prior to the introduction of any new technology and, in particular, the inclusion of sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"74-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ventilator-associated pneumonia risk factors in patients with severe COVID-19 in southern Brazil: A retrospective observational study. 巴西南部重症 COVID-19 患者的呼吸机相关肺炎风险因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.004
Gabriela De Souza Dos Santos, Viviane Alves de Carvalho França de Macedo, Samantha Oliniski Reikdal, Maria Esther Graf, Beatris Mario Martin, Marineli Joaquim Meier

Backgound: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a significant number of critical patients required ventilatory assistance in health institutions. In this context, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) was the most prevalent nosocomial infection among critically ill patients. We aimed to analyze the occurrence of VAP in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 and the risk factors associated with the outcome.

Method: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study which included patients ≥18 years old, diagnosed with COVID-19, admitted to intensive care units (ICU) and who received invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) for >2 consecutive days. The associations between the variables were initially tested, and those that showed potential associations (p<0.05) were included in the multivariate logistic regression model.

Results: One third of patients had an episode of VAP, with an incidence density of 34.97 cases per 1000 MV days. In addition, 42.37% (50) of the microorganisms causing VAP were multidrug-resistant, predominantly gram-negative bacteria (61.32%). More than 50% of participants developed healthcare-associated infections and 243 (73.64%) died. The factors associated with greater chances of VAP were: prone position (OR= 3.77), BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 (OR= 4.76), pressure injury (OR= 4.41), length of stay in the ICU (OR= 1.06), positive tracheal aspirate before VAP (OR= 5.41) and dyspnea (OR= 3.80).

Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19 are at high risk of VAP, which leads to an increased risk of death (OR = 2.18). Multiple factors increase the chances of VAP in this population, namely: work overload in health institutions, prone position, prolonged ICU time, infusion of multiple drugs, invasive devices, and in particular, immobility in bed.

背景:在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,医疗机构中有大量危重病人需要呼吸机辅助治疗。在这种情况下,呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)成为危重病人中最常见的院内感染。我们的目的是分析 SARS-CoV-2 重症患者中 VAP 的发生率以及与结果相关的风险因素:这是一项多中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括年龄≥18 岁、确诊感染 COVID-19、入住重症监护病房(ICU)且连续接受有创机械通气(MV)2 天以上的患者。对各变量之间的关联性进行了初步检验,结果表明这些变量之间存在潜在关联(p):三分之一的患者曾发生过 VAP,发病密度为每 1000 个机械通气日 34.97 例。此外,42.37%(50 例)引起 VAP 的微生物具有多重耐药性,主要是革兰氏阴性菌(61.32%)。超过 50%的参与者发生了医护相关感染,243 人(73.64%)死亡。与VAP发生几率较大相关的因素有:俯卧位(OR= 3.77)、体重指数25-29.9 kg/m2(OR= 4.76)、压力损伤(OR= 4.41)、ICU住院时间(OR= 1.06)、VAP前气管吸痰阳性(OR= 5.41)和呼吸困难(OR= 3.80):COVID-19患者发生VAP的风险很高,导致死亡风险增加(OR=2.18)。多种因素增加了这一人群发生 VAP 的几率,即:医疗机构工作负荷过重、俯卧位、重症监护室时间过长、输注多种药物、侵入性设备,尤其是卧床不动。
{"title":"Ventilator-associated pneumonia risk factors in patients with severe COVID-19 in southern Brazil: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Gabriela De Souza Dos Santos, Viviane Alves de Carvalho França de Macedo, Samantha Oliniski Reikdal, Maria Esther Graf, Beatris Mario Martin, Marineli Joaquim Meier","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgound: </strong>During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a significant number of critical patients required ventilatory assistance in health institutions. In this context, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) was the most prevalent nosocomial infection among critically ill patients. We aimed to analyze the occurrence of VAP in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 and the risk factors associated with the outcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study which included patients ≥18 years old, diagnosed with COVID-19, admitted to intensive care units (ICU) and who received invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) for >2 consecutive days. The associations between the variables were initially tested, and those that showed potential associations (p<0.05) were included in the multivariate logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One third of patients had an episode of VAP, with an incidence density of 34.97 cases per 1000 MV days. In addition, 42.37% (50) of the microorganisms causing VAP were multidrug-resistant, predominantly gram-negative bacteria (61.32%). More than 50% of participants developed healthcare-associated infections and 243 (73.64%) died. The factors associated with greater chances of VAP were: prone position (OR= 3.77), BMI 25-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (OR= 4.76), pressure injury (OR= 4.41), length of stay in the ICU (OR= 1.06), positive tracheal aspirate before VAP (OR= 5.41) and dyspnea (OR= 3.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with COVID-19 are at high risk of VAP, which leads to an increased risk of death (OR = 2.18). Multiple factors increase the chances of VAP in this population, namely: work overload in health institutions, prone position, prolonged ICU time, infusion of multiple drugs, invasive devices, and in particular, immobility in bed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":"38-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The application of environmental health assessment strategies to detect Streptococcus pyogenes in Kimberley school classrooms. 应用环境健康评估策略检测金伯利学校教室中的化脓性链球菌。
Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.12.001
Stephanie L Enkel, Bernadette Wong, August Mickuki, Abbey J Ford, Megan O'Brien, Tharushi Pallegedara, Liam Bedford, Hannah M M Thomas, Nina Lansbury, Jonathan R Carapetis, Dylan D Barth, Janessa Pickering, Asha C Bowen

Background: Children spend almost one-third of their waking hours at school. Streptococcus pyogenes (Strep A) is a common childhood bacterial infection that can progress to causing serious disease. We aimed to detect Strep A in classrooms by using environmental settle plates and swabbing of high-touch surfaces in two remote schools in the Kimberley, Western Australia.

Methods: Twelve classrooms in two schools participated in 2021 and 2022. Seven horse-blood agar plates containing colistin and nalidixic acid (HBA-CNA) were placed in each occupied classroom at varied heights for 4 h, and 20 high-touch items were swabbed and later cultured on HBA-CNA plates. The primary outcome of each sample was presence or absence of Strep A. Identified Strep A isolates were whole genome sequenced (WGS) to assess for similarity between host-derived and environmental strains.

Results: During two visits to each participating Kimberley school in June 2021 and September 2022, the point prevalence of Strep A positive throat swab ranged between 3/34 (8.8 %) and 5/21 (23.8 %); Strep A impetigo was lower at between 0/43 (0 %) and 2/23 (8.7 %). Strep A was detected from 4/240 (2 %) environmental swabs collected across 3/12 (25 %) classrooms but not cultured from any of the classroom settle plates. Whole genome sequencing identified environmental emm types to also be those strains in circulation.

Conclusions: There was little evidence to support fomite, droplet or airborne Strep A in classrooms as major modes of transmission among children. Further work is required to determine if classrooms play a role in the transmission of Strep A between students.

背景:孩子们醒着的时间几乎有三分之一是在学校度过的。化脓性链球菌(链球菌A)是一种常见的儿童细菌感染,可以发展成严重的疾病。我们的目标是通过在西澳大利亚金伯利的两所偏远学校使用环境检测板和擦拭高接触表面来检测教室中的链球菌A。方法:分别于2021年和2022年参与两所学校的12个教室。将7个含有粘菌素和萘啶酸(HBA-CNA)的马血琼脂板放置在每个占用的教室不同高度上4小时,并擦拭20个高接触项目,然后在HBA-CNA板上培养。每个样本的主要结果是存在或不存在链球菌A。鉴定出的链球菌A分离株进行全基因组测序(WGS),以评估宿主衍生菌株和环境菌株之间的相似性。结果:在2021年6月和2022年9月对每个金伯利参与学校进行两次访问时,链球菌A阳性咽拭子点患病率在3/34(8.8%)和5/21(23.8%)之间;A链球菌脓疱疮较低,在0/43(0%)和2/23(8.7%)之间。在3/12间教室(25%)收集的4/240份(2%)环境拭子中检测到链球菌A,但在任何教室沉淀板中均未检测到链球菌A。全基因组测序鉴定出环境型emm也是那些在流通的菌株。结论:几乎没有证据支持教室中污染物、飞沫或空气传播的甲型链球菌是儿童传播的主要方式。需要进一步的工作来确定教室是否在学生之间传播甲型链球菌中起作用。
{"title":"The application of environmental health assessment strategies to detect Streptococcus pyogenes in Kimberley school classrooms.","authors":"Stephanie L Enkel, Bernadette Wong, August Mickuki, Abbey J Ford, Megan O'Brien, Tharushi Pallegedara, Liam Bedford, Hannah M M Thomas, Nina Lansbury, Jonathan R Carapetis, Dylan D Barth, Janessa Pickering, Asha C Bowen","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children spend almost one-third of their waking hours at school. Streptococcus pyogenes (Strep A) is a common childhood bacterial infection that can progress to causing serious disease. We aimed to detect Strep A in classrooms by using environmental settle plates and swabbing of high-touch surfaces in two remote schools in the Kimberley, Western Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve classrooms in two schools participated in 2021 and 2022. Seven horse-blood agar plates containing colistin and nalidixic acid (HBA-CNA) were placed in each occupied classroom at varied heights for 4 h, and 20 high-touch items were swabbed and later cultured on HBA-CNA plates. The primary outcome of each sample was presence or absence of Strep A. Identified Strep A isolates were whole genome sequenced (WGS) to assess for similarity between host-derived and environmental strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During two visits to each participating Kimberley school in June 2021 and September 2022, the point prevalence of Strep A positive throat swab ranged between 3/34 (8.8 %) and 5/21 (23.8 %); Strep A impetigo was lower at between 0/43 (0 %) and 2/23 (8.7 %). Strep A was detected from 4/240 (2 %) environmental swabs collected across 3/12 (25 %) classrooms but not cultured from any of the classroom settle plates. Whole genome sequencing identified environmental emm types to also be those strains in circulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was little evidence to support fomite, droplet or airborne Strep A in classrooms as major modes of transmission among children. Further work is required to determine if classrooms play a role in the transmission of Strep A between students.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142900911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Infection, disease & health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1