Pub Date : 2024-11-24DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.004
Michael J Lydeamore, David Wu, Tjibbe Donker, Claire Gorrie, Charlie K Higgs, Marion Easton, Daneeta Hennessy, Nicholas Geard, Benjamin P Howden, Ben S Cooper, Andrew Wilson, Anton Y Peleg, Andrew J Stewardson
Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are an emerging public health concern globally as they are resistant to a broad spectrum of antibiotics. Colonisation with CPE typically requires patients to be managed under 'contact precautions', which creates additional physical bed demands in healthcare facilities.
Methods: This study examined the potential impact of revised isolation guidelines introduced in late 2023 in Victoria, Australia, that relaxed the requirement for indefinite isolation of CPE-colonised patients in contact precautions, based on admission of CPE-diagnosed cases prior to the guideline change.
Results & conclusions: Our analysis showed that while the changes result in modest savings in the need for dedicated isolation rooms, they could reduce the duration of time individual patients spend in isolation by up to three weeks. However, ongoing investments to expand isolation capacity would still be required to accommodate the rising incidence of CPE.
{"title":"Changes in isolation guidelines for CPE patients results in only mild reduction in required hospital beds.","authors":"Michael J Lydeamore, David Wu, Tjibbe Donker, Claire Gorrie, Charlie K Higgs, Marion Easton, Daneeta Hennessy, Nicholas Geard, Benjamin P Howden, Ben S Cooper, Andrew Wilson, Anton Y Peleg, Andrew J Stewardson","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are an emerging public health concern globally as they are resistant to a broad spectrum of antibiotics. Colonisation with CPE typically requires patients to be managed under 'contact precautions', which creates additional physical bed demands in healthcare facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the potential impact of revised isolation guidelines introduced in late 2023 in Victoria, Australia, that relaxed the requirement for indefinite isolation of CPE-colonised patients in contact precautions, based on admission of CPE-diagnosed cases prior to the guideline change.</p><p><strong>Results & conclusions: </strong>Our analysis showed that while the changes result in modest savings in the need for dedicated isolation rooms, they could reduce the duration of time individual patients spend in isolation by up to three weeks. However, ongoing investments to expand isolation capacity would still be required to accommodate the rising incidence of CPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-23DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.11.001
Georgia Matterson, Katrina Browne, Philip L Russo, Sonja Dawson, Hannah Kent, Brett G Mitchell
Background: Hand hygiene (HH) is an essential element of infection prevention and control programs. Direct observation of adherence to the 5 moments for HH is considered the gold standard in compliance monitoring. However, as direct observation introduces potential bias, other strategies have been proposed to supplement HH compliance data in healthcare facilities. This study evaluated the accuracy of an automatic counting system (MEZRIT™) to detect when a HH product (soap or alcohol-based hand rub) was dispensed, and thus measure product usage as opposed to compliance with the 5 moments for HH.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a nursing simulation lab where seven participants undertook basic nursing tasks which included performing HH. Sensors were attached to soap and alcohol-based hand rub dispensers to record the time at which a product was dispensed. HH events were video recorded (time-stamped) and validated against timestamps from the automatic counting system.
Results: 260 HH events were detected by the automatic counting system and confirmed by video recordings. 5182 non-HH events were calculated from analysis of the video recordings. The automatic counting system had 90 % sensitivity (95%CI 85.8-93.1 %), and 100 % specificity (95%CI 99.9-100 %). This model generated a positive predictive value of 100 % (95%Cl 98.4-100 %), and a negative predictive value of 99.5 % (95%CI 99.3-99.7 %).
Conclusion: The MEZRIT™ system accurately identified 90 % of HH events and excluded 100 % of non-HH events. The real-time monitoring of HH product usage may be beneficial in responding quickly to changes in product usage.
{"title":"Evaluating the accuracy of an automatic counting system to detect dispensing of hand hygiene product.","authors":"Georgia Matterson, Katrina Browne, Philip L Russo, Sonja Dawson, Hannah Kent, Brett G Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand hygiene (HH) is an essential element of infection prevention and control programs. Direct observation of adherence to the 5 moments for HH is considered the gold standard in compliance monitoring. However, as direct observation introduces potential bias, other strategies have been proposed to supplement HH compliance data in healthcare facilities. This study evaluated the accuracy of an automatic counting system (MEZRIT™) to detect when a HH product (soap or alcohol-based hand rub) was dispensed, and thus measure product usage as opposed to compliance with the 5 moments for HH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a nursing simulation lab where seven participants undertook basic nursing tasks which included performing HH. Sensors were attached to soap and alcohol-based hand rub dispensers to record the time at which a product was dispensed. HH events were video recorded (time-stamped) and validated against timestamps from the automatic counting system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>260 HH events were detected by the automatic counting system and confirmed by video recordings. 5182 non-HH events were calculated from analysis of the video recordings. The automatic counting system had 90 % sensitivity (95%CI 85.8-93.1 %), and 100 % specificity (95%CI 99.9-100 %). This model generated a positive predictive value of 100 % (95%Cl 98.4-100 %), and a negative predictive value of 99.5 % (95%CI 99.3-99.7 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MEZRIT™ system accurately identified 90 % of HH events and excluded 100 % of non-HH events. The real-time monitoring of HH product usage may be beneficial in responding quickly to changes in product usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142712324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.001
Oluremilekun Oyefolu, Gigi Kwik Gronvall
Background: Despite the uncertainty raised by several studies regarding the practicality of Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) in hospital settings, the urgency prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic led many hospitals to invest in these rapid diagnostics. As the COVID-19 pandemic showcased the potential of POCT in emergency situations, an urgent call arises to leverage the successes and lessons learned for the long-term benefit of healthcare systems, particularly in preparation for the next pandemic of viral respiratory nature.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine emergency care and hospital laboratory stakeholders with expertise and responsibility over POCT operations within hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Maryland, USA. The grounded theory approach was utilized, and the transcripts were thematically analyzed through an iterative process.
Results: Three distinct themes were identified as barriers to POCT implementation: Regulatory barriers encompassed inconsistencies between the federal and state regulations and a regulatory structure that lags technological advancements. Staffing and operational barriers comprised a shortage of POCT workforce including nurses and Point of Care coordinators. Economic barriers were linked to the overall cost of integrating new POCT devices into the existing testing menu at emergency departments.
Conclusion: We conclude with strategies, including policy considerations, to enable and sustain decentralized POCT programs within hospitals. Some of these strategies include expanding the workforce trained in the regulatory procedures required to support POCT; harmonizing state and federal regulations for diagnostic testing, especially for FDA-waived POCT; and sustained funding for POCT development and use for public health preparedness.
{"title":"Exploring challenges and policy considerations in point-of-care testing for hospital preparedness ahead of infectious disease emergencies: A qualitative study.","authors":"Oluremilekun Oyefolu, Gigi Kwik Gronvall","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the uncertainty raised by several studies regarding the practicality of Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) in hospital settings, the urgency prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic led many hospitals to invest in these rapid diagnostics. As the COVID-19 pandemic showcased the potential of POCT in emergency situations, an urgent call arises to leverage the successes and lessons learned for the long-term benefit of healthcare systems, particularly in preparation for the next pandemic of viral respiratory nature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine emergency care and hospital laboratory stakeholders with expertise and responsibility over POCT operations within hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Maryland, USA. The grounded theory approach was utilized, and the transcripts were thematically analyzed through an iterative process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct themes were identified as barriers to POCT implementation: Regulatory barriers encompassed inconsistencies between the federal and state regulations and a regulatory structure that lags technological advancements. Staffing and operational barriers comprised a shortage of POCT workforce including nurses and Point of Care coordinators. Economic barriers were linked to the overall cost of integrating new POCT devices into the existing testing menu at emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude with strategies, including policy considerations, to enable and sustain decentralized POCT programs within hospitals. Some of these strategies include expanding the workforce trained in the regulatory procedures required to support POCT; harmonizing state and federal regulations for diagnostic testing, especially for FDA-waived POCT; and sustained funding for POCT development and use for public health preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142693532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.002
Matt Mason, Byeonghun Im, Jocelyne M Basseal, Peta-Anne Zimmerman
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the vital role of Infection Prevention and Control Professionals (IPCPs) in safeguarding public health. Amid rapidly evolving guidelines, critical personal protective equipment shortages, and surging workloads, IPCPs encountered unprecedented moral and ethical dilemmas. However, their experiences, ethical challenges, and the resulting moral distress remain understudied.
Methods: A scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's methodology was conducted to examine current research on ethical challenges and moral distress among IPCPs. Searches in CINAHL, MEDLINE via OVID, Emcare, Scopus, and Korea Citation Index yielded two extracted articles.
Results: Common themes included high workload, increased recognition, pressure to deliver accurate and timely information, need for peer support, and evidence-based practice. Differences in nationality, role discretion, and administrative systems led to varied experiences. District Medical Officers in Norway experienced more decision-making responsibilities and resulting ethical dilemmas in the context of broader communities and municipalities. The experiences of IPCPs were confined to their respective healthcare facilities.
Conclusion: There is a dearth of available research reporting the moral distress experienced by IPCPs whilst there is a plethora for those seen as "frontline" workers. Given the integral decision-making and implementation roles of these health professionals, and the burdens of ethical dilemmas they experienced in pandemic preparedness and response, further research is imperative to inform strategies to build moral resilience in the future.
{"title":"Moral distress among infection prevention and control professionals: A scoping review.","authors":"Matt Mason, Byeonghun Im, Jocelyne M Basseal, Peta-Anne Zimmerman","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the vital role of Infection Prevention and Control Professionals (IPCPs) in safeguarding public health. Amid rapidly evolving guidelines, critical personal protective equipment shortages, and surging workloads, IPCPs encountered unprecedented moral and ethical dilemmas. However, their experiences, ethical challenges, and the resulting moral distress remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's methodology was conducted to examine current research on ethical challenges and moral distress among IPCPs. Searches in CINAHL, MEDLINE via OVID, Emcare, Scopus, and Korea Citation Index yielded two extracted articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Common themes included high workload, increased recognition, pressure to deliver accurate and timely information, need for peer support, and evidence-based practice. Differences in nationality, role discretion, and administrative systems led to varied experiences. District Medical Officers in Norway experienced more decision-making responsibilities and resulting ethical dilemmas in the context of broader communities and municipalities. The experiences of IPCPs were confined to their respective healthcare facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a dearth of available research reporting the moral distress experienced by IPCPs whilst there is a plethora for those seen as \"frontline\" workers. Given the integral decision-making and implementation roles of these health professionals, and the burdens of ethical dilemmas they experienced in pandemic preparedness and response, further research is imperative to inform strategies to build moral resilience in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142693533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.09.038
Brett G Mitchell, Philip L Russo
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic placed considerable strain on the infection control professional workforce, who were at the forefront of pandemic response in their organisations and beyond. In order to support infection control professionals and inform future initiatives, it is important to further understand the infection control workforce. The objective of this study was to determine stress and resilience levels, personality traits and workforce intentions of infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand.
Methods: We undertook an anonymous, cross-sectional online survey of infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand. Validated tools, the brief resilience tool, workforce stressor tool and the Big Five personality test, were used to evaluate levels of stress, resilience and personality traits.
Results: Three hundred and fifty-six infection control professionals started the survey, with representation from all Australian jurisdictions and New Zealand. The mean stress score was 4.28 (SD 3.39) and 3.34 (SD 0.65) for resilience. Younger participants and those with less experience in infection control had higher levels of stress and lower levels of resilience. Individual personality traits vary by age, level of education and credentialing status. Approximately one-fifth of participants indicated that they planned to leave the IC workforce in the next three years.
Conclusions: Our study was the largest published study involving infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand. Findings highlight the need for mentoring, peer support and wellbeing initiatives to support the profession. Understanding personality traits may also be beneficial for further enhancing communication and interpersonal relationships.
{"title":"Infection prevention and control professionals: Stress, resilience, personality traits and views about their workforce and profession.","authors":"Brett G Mitchell, Philip L Russo","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.09.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.09.038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic placed considerable strain on the infection control professional workforce, who were at the forefront of pandemic response in their organisations and beyond. In order to support infection control professionals and inform future initiatives, it is important to further understand the infection control workforce. The objective of this study was to determine stress and resilience levels, personality traits and workforce intentions of infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook an anonymous, cross-sectional online survey of infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand. Validated tools, the brief resilience tool, workforce stressor tool and the Big Five personality test, were used to evaluate levels of stress, resilience and personality traits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and fifty-six infection control professionals started the survey, with representation from all Australian jurisdictions and New Zealand. The mean stress score was 4.28 (SD 3.39) and 3.34 (SD 0.65) for resilience. Younger participants and those with less experience in infection control had higher levels of stress and lower levels of resilience. Individual personality traits vary by age, level of education and credentialing status. Approximately one-fifth of participants indicated that they planned to leave the IC workforce in the next three years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study was the largest published study involving infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand. Findings highlight the need for mentoring, peer support and wellbeing initiatives to support the profession. Understanding personality traits may also be beneficial for further enhancing communication and interpersonal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142549793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.004
Matthew Olsen, Adrian Goldsworthy, Mark Morgan, John Leggett, Thibaut Demaneuf, Natalia Van Der Bruggen, Gobinddeep Singh, Rose Ghemrawi, Abiola Senok, Reem Almheiri, Simon McKirdy, Rashed Alghafri, Lotti Tajouri
Introduction: Mobile phones, contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms, have the potential to act as "trojan horses". The microbial signatures present on their surfaces most probably vary across different geographical regions. As a result, mobile phones belonging to international conference attendees may serve as a model for global microbial dissemination, posing potential risks to public health and biosecurity.
Aim: This study aimed to profile the microbes present on mobile phones belonging to delegates attending an international scientific conference through use of metagenomic shotgun DNA sequencing.
Methods: Twenty mobile phones, representing ten different geographical zones from around the world, were swabbed and pooled together into ten geographical-specific samples for high definition next-generation DNA sequencing. WONCA council members were invited to participate and provided verbal consent. Following DNA extraction, next generation sequencing, to a depth of approximately 10Gbp per sample, was undertaken on a v1.5 Illumina NovaSeq6000 system. Bioinformatic analysis was performed via the CosmosID platform.
Results: A total of 2204 microbial hits were accumulated across 20 mobile phones inclusive of 882 bacteria, 1229 viruses, 88 fungi and 5 protozoa. Of particular concern was the identification of 65 distinct antibiotic resistance genes and 86 virulence genes. Plant, animal and human pathogens, including ESKAPE and HACEK bacteria were found on mobile phones.
Discussion/conclusion: Mobile phones of international attendees are contaminated with many & varied microorganisms. Further research is required to characterize the risks these devices pose for biosecurity and public health. Development of new policies which appropriately address and prevent such risks maybe warranted.
{"title":"Microbial laden mobile phones from international conference attendees pose potential risks to public health and biosecurity.","authors":"Matthew Olsen, Adrian Goldsworthy, Mark Morgan, John Leggett, Thibaut Demaneuf, Natalia Van Der Bruggen, Gobinddeep Singh, Rose Ghemrawi, Abiola Senok, Reem Almheiri, Simon McKirdy, Rashed Alghafri, Lotti Tajouri","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mobile phones, contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms, have the potential to act as \"trojan horses\". The microbial signatures present on their surfaces most probably vary across different geographical regions. As a result, mobile phones belonging to international conference attendees may serve as a model for global microbial dissemination, posing potential risks to public health and biosecurity.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to profile the microbes present on mobile phones belonging to delegates attending an international scientific conference through use of metagenomic shotgun DNA sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty mobile phones, representing ten different geographical zones from around the world, were swabbed and pooled together into ten geographical-specific samples for high definition next-generation DNA sequencing. WONCA council members were invited to participate and provided verbal consent. Following DNA extraction, next generation sequencing, to a depth of approximately 10Gbp per sample, was undertaken on a v1.5 Illumina NovaSeq6000 system. Bioinformatic analysis was performed via the CosmosID platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2204 microbial hits were accumulated across 20 mobile phones inclusive of 882 bacteria, 1229 viruses, 88 fungi and 5 protozoa. Of particular concern was the identification of 65 distinct antibiotic resistance genes and 86 virulence genes. Plant, animal and human pathogens, including ESKAPE and HACEK bacteria were found on mobile phones.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Mobile phones of international attendees are contaminated with many & varied microorganisms. Further research is required to characterize the risks these devices pose for biosecurity and public health. Development of new policies which appropriately address and prevent such risks maybe warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-20DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.003
Javier Roberti, Juan Pedro Alonso, Natalí Ini, Cecilia Loudet, Wanda Cornistein, Inés Suárez-Anzorena, Marina Guglielmino, Ana Paula Rodríguez, Ezequiel García-Elorrio, Facundo Jorro-Barón, Viviana M Rodríguez
Background: Healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic resistance worsen globally. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) aim to optimise infection treatment and curb resistance, yet implementation hurdles persist. This study examined ASP challenges in ICUs.
Methods: This study employed a qualitative methodological design to evaluate the implementation process of an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in eight intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) were conducted. Interviews were analysed guided by Normalisation Process Theory, examining coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring constructs.
Results: Key challenges included insufficient human resources, lack of institutional support, and resistance to change, particularly among staff not initially involved in the study. Despite these challenges, the program saw partial success in improving ICU practices, particularly in antibiotic use and communication across departments. The main strategy implemented in this quality improvement collaborative was the use of improvement cycles, which served as the central component for driving change. However, participation in improvement cycles was inconsistent, and sustainability post-intervention remains uncertain due to workload pressures and the need for continuous education. Concerns about workload and communication barriers persisted. Many participants did not perceive training as a separate component, which led to low engagement. Resistance to change became evident during modifications to clinical guidelines. The intervention had a positive impact on various processes, including communication and record keeping.
Conclusion: This study underscores the persistent challenges in implementing ASPs in healthcare, emphasising the need for enhanced collaboration, workforce capacity building, and evidence-based practices to overcome barriers and optimize antimicrobial use to improve patient outcomes.
背景:全球医疗相关感染和抗生素耐药性日益严重。抗生素监管计划(ASP)旨在优化感染治疗和遏制耐药性,但实施过程中仍存在障碍。本研究探讨了在重症监护病房实施抗生素管理计划所面临的挑战:本研究采用定性方法学设计,对阿根廷八家重症监护病房(ICU)的抗生素监管计划(ASP)实施过程进行评估。研究人员对医护人员(HCWs)进行了 34 次半结构式访谈。访谈以规范化过程理论(Normalisation Process Theory)为指导进行分析,考察了一致性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监控等建构因素:主要挑战包括人力资源不足、缺乏机构支持以及对变革的抵制,尤其是最初未参与研究的员工。尽管面临这些挑战,但该计划在改善重症监护室的实践方面取得了部分成功,尤其是在抗生素使用和跨部门沟通方面。该质量改进合作项目实施的主要策略是使用改进周期,这是推动变革的核心组成部分。然而,参与改进周期的情况并不一致,而且由于工作量压力和持续教育的需要,干预后的可持续性仍不确定。对工作量和沟通障碍的担忧依然存在。许多参与者不认为培训是一个单独的组成部分,这导致参与度低。在修改临床指南的过程中,对变革的抵触情绪十分明显。干预措施对各种流程产生了积极影响,包括沟通和记录保存:本研究强调了在医疗保健领域实施 ASP 所面临的长期挑战,强调需要加强合作、劳动力能力建设和循证实践,以克服障碍并优化抗菌药物的使用,从而改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Improvement in antibacterial use in intensive care units from Argentina: A quality improvement collaborative process evaluation using Normalization Process Theory.","authors":"Javier Roberti, Juan Pedro Alonso, Natalí Ini, Cecilia Loudet, Wanda Cornistein, Inés Suárez-Anzorena, Marina Guglielmino, Ana Paula Rodríguez, Ezequiel García-Elorrio, Facundo Jorro-Barón, Viviana M Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic resistance worsen globally. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) aim to optimise infection treatment and curb resistance, yet implementation hurdles persist. This study examined ASP challenges in ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a qualitative methodological design to evaluate the implementation process of an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in eight intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) were conducted. Interviews were analysed guided by Normalisation Process Theory, examining coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key challenges included insufficient human resources, lack of institutional support, and resistance to change, particularly among staff not initially involved in the study. Despite these challenges, the program saw partial success in improving ICU practices, particularly in antibiotic use and communication across departments. The main strategy implemented in this quality improvement collaborative was the use of improvement cycles, which served as the central component for driving change. However, participation in improvement cycles was inconsistent, and sustainability post-intervention remains uncertain due to workload pressures and the need for continuous education. Concerns about workload and communication barriers persisted. Many participants did not perceive training as a separate component, which led to low engagement. Resistance to change became evident during modifications to clinical guidelines. The intervention had a positive impact on various processes, including communication and record keeping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the persistent challenges in implementing ASPs in healthcare, emphasising the need for enhanced collaboration, workforce capacity building, and evidence-based practices to overcome barriers and optimize antimicrobial use to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-16DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.002
Helena C Maltezou, Flora Sourri, Nikolaos Lemonakis, Amalia Karapanou, Theodoros V Giannouchos, Maria N Gamaletsou, Dimitra-Maria Koukou, Kyriakos Souliotis, Athanasia Lourida, Periklis Panagopoulos, Dimitrios Hatzigeorgiou, Nikolaos V Sipsas
Background: To evaluate the influenza-like illness (ILI) and acute respiratory infection (ARI) case definitions in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and influenza in healthcare personnel (HCP).
Methods: We followed a cohort of 5752 HCP from November 2022 to May 2023. Symptomatic HCP were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza by real-time PCR and/or rapid antigen detection test. ILI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 systemic symptom and ≥1 respiratory symptom. ARI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 respiratory symptom. Patients with respiratory symptoms were grouped either as ILI or as ARI based on the presence of fever, malaise, headache and/or myalgia.
Results: Overall, 466 ILI cases and 383 ARI cases occurred. HCP with ILI had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 22.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.23-78.04] to be diagnosed with influenza. HCP with ARI had an aOR of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.88-3.88) to be diagnosed with COVID-19. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of ILI for influenza were 96.6%, 49.9%, 18.2%, and 99.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ARI for COVID-19 were 51.7%, 73.6%, 84.9%, and 34.8%, respectively. ILI and ARI had an overall correct classification rate of 89.6% and 74.1%, respectively.
Conclusion: Our findings support the use of both ILI and ARI case definitions in the diagnosis of influenza and COVID-19 in HCP.
背景:评估医护人员在诊断 COVID-19 和流感时对流感样疾病(ILI)和急性呼吸道感染(ARI)病例的定义:评估医护人员(HCP)在诊断COVID-19和流感时的流感样疾病(ILI)和急性呼吸道感染(ARI)病例定义:方法:我们从 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 5 月对 5752 名医护人员进行了追踪调查。通过实时 PCR 和/或快速抗原检测试验对有症状的医护人员进行了 SARS-CoV-2 和流感检测。ILI定义为突然出现≥1种全身症状和≥1种呼吸道症状。ARI是指突然出现≥1种呼吸道症状。根据发热、乏力、头痛和/或肌痛的存在情况,将有呼吸道症状的患者归为 ILI 或 ARI:总共有 466 例 ILI 和 383 例 ARI。患流感性咽喉炎的住院病人被诊断为流感的调整赔率(aOR)为 22.05 [95%置信区间(CI):6.23-78.04]。患有急性呼吸道感染的人类接触者被诊断为 COVID-19 的 aOR 为 2.70(95% 置信区间:1.88-3.88)。流感 ILI 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 96.6%、49.9%、18.2% 和 99.2%。COVID-19对ARI的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为51.7%、73.6%、84.9%和34.8%。ILI和ARI的总体分类正确率分别为89.6%和74.1%:我们的研究结果支持使用 ILI 和 ARI 病例定义来诊断高危人群中的流感和 COVID-19。
{"title":"Evaluation of the influenza-like illness case definition and the acute respiratory infection case definition in the diagnosis of influenza and COVID-19 in healthcare personnel.","authors":"Helena C Maltezou, Flora Sourri, Nikolaos Lemonakis, Amalia Karapanou, Theodoros V Giannouchos, Maria N Gamaletsou, Dimitra-Maria Koukou, Kyriakos Souliotis, Athanasia Lourida, Periklis Panagopoulos, Dimitrios Hatzigeorgiou, Nikolaos V Sipsas","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the influenza-like illness (ILI) and acute respiratory infection (ARI) case definitions in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and influenza in healthcare personnel (HCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed a cohort of 5752 HCP from November 2022 to May 2023. Symptomatic HCP were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza by real-time PCR and/or rapid antigen detection test. ILI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 systemic symptom and ≥1 respiratory symptom. ARI was defined as the sudden onset of ≥1 respiratory symptom. Patients with respiratory symptoms were grouped either as ILI or as ARI based on the presence of fever, malaise, headache and/or myalgia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 466 ILI cases and 383 ARI cases occurred. HCP with ILI had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 22.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.23-78.04] to be diagnosed with influenza. HCP with ARI had an aOR of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.88-3.88) to be diagnosed with COVID-19. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of ILI for influenza were 96.6%, 49.9%, 18.2%, and 99.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ARI for COVID-19 were 51.7%, 73.6%, 84.9%, and 34.8%, respectively. ILI and ARI had an overall correct classification rate of 89.6% and 74.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support the use of both ILI and ARI case definitions in the diagnosis of influenza and COVID-19 in HCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-13DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.007
Deborough Macbeth, Catherine Viengkham, Ramon Z Shaban
Infection prevention and control programs are vital to ensuring the health and wellbeing of healthcare consumers and staff. Infection control professionals who lead these programs are uniquely positioned with the knowledge, skills and attributes to direct effective infection control practices and policies within their healthcare setting. As with many specialisations, these individuals may choose to undertake a credentialling process, where their expertise and competence are evaluated and formally recognised by a professional body. Globally, there is growing evidence that credentialling improves the standard of practice of infection control professionals, and achieves beneficial outcomes for staff, patients and the broader healthcare systems in which they operate. In Australia, credentialling is a relatively new endeavour emerging in the mid 1990s with the rapidly evolving profile of the infection control professional. In this paper, we detail the history and evolution of credentialling of the infection control professionals in Australia. We also appraise the current three-tier credentialling framework, including its underlying philosophy, how it distinguishes between 'competence' and 'capability', the mechanisms it provides for career development, and its adaptation in response to critical contemporary developments in the field of infection control in Australia, including the expanding diversity of contemporary practice.
{"title":"Credentialling in Australia for infection prevention and control: Philosophy, principles and practice.","authors":"Deborough Macbeth, Catherine Viengkham, Ramon Z Shaban","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infection prevention and control programs are vital to ensuring the health and wellbeing of healthcare consumers and staff. Infection control professionals who lead these programs are uniquely positioned with the knowledge, skills and attributes to direct effective infection control practices and policies within their healthcare setting. As with many specialisations, these individuals may choose to undertake a credentialling process, where their expertise and competence are evaluated and formally recognised by a professional body. Globally, there is growing evidence that credentialling improves the standard of practice of infection control professionals, and achieves beneficial outcomes for staff, patients and the broader healthcare systems in which they operate. In Australia, credentialling is a relatively new endeavour emerging in the mid 1990s with the rapidly evolving profile of the infection control professional. In this paper, we detail the history and evolution of credentialling of the infection control professionals in Australia. We also appraise the current three-tier credentialling framework, including its underlying philosophy, how it distinguishes between 'competence' and 'capability', the mechanisms it provides for career development, and its adaptation in response to critical contemporary developments in the field of infection control in Australia, including the expanding diversity of contemporary practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.006
Samantha Keogh, Emily Larsen, Amanda Corley, Mari Takashima, Nicole Marsh, Melannie Edwards, Heather Reynolds, Jayesh Dhanani, Fiona Coyer, Kevin B Laupland, Claire M Rickard
Background: Access to arterial circulation through arterial catheters (ACs) is crucial for monitoring and decision-making in intensive care units (ICU) but carries the risk of complications including bloodstream infection (BSI).
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from four randomised controlled trials in Australian ICUs, investigating the efficacy of different AC interventions. De-identified data were combined into a single dataset, and per-patient outcomes analysed. The primary outcome was AC-BSI, defined as laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI) type 1 or 2, with a concurrent local infection. All-cause AC failure was defined as any unplanned removal. AC infection and failure were reported as rates per 1000 catheter days and hours.
Results: Data from 1117 adult patients were analysed. Mean age was 58.8 years (±16.6); and 41% (n = 462) were male. Median AC dwell time was 110 h (IQR 28.3-168.0). There was one case (<0.1%; 0.18/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.03-1.29]) of AC-BSI, and 14 cases of LCBI (1%; 13 LCBI-1 and 1 LCBI-2; 2.54/1000 catheter days [95% CI 1.51-4.30]). LCBI were most commonly Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. There were four cases of local infection (<1%; 0.73/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.27-1.94]). Overall AC failure rate was 13% (n = 146) or 26.53/1000 catheter days (95% CI 22.56-31.20).
Conclusion: This study identified a relatively low incidence of complications. This is likely reflective of poor monitoring of ACs in intensive care. Better surveillance and a rigorous prospective evaluation of AC outcomes is required to understand the true risk ACs pose to critically ill patients.
背景:通过动脉导管(AC)进入动脉循环对重症监护病房(ICU)的监测和决策至关重要,但也存在包括血流感染(BSI)在内的并发症风险:我们对澳大利亚重症监护病房的四项随机对照试验数据进行了二次分析,研究了不同 AC 干预措施的疗效。去身份化数据合并成一个数据集,并对每位患者的结果进行分析。主要结果是 AC-BSI,定义为实验室确诊的 1 型或 2 型血流感染(LCBI),同时伴有局部感染。全因 AC 失败定义为任何非计划性切除。导管感染率和失败率以每 1000 个导管天数和小时数为单位进行报告:结果:分析了 1117 名成年患者的数据。平均年龄为 58.8 岁 (±16.6);男性占 41% (n = 462)。中位 AC 停留时间为 110 小时(IQR 28.3-168.0)。有一个病例(结论:这项研究发现并发症的发生率相对较低。这可能反映出重症监护中对空调的监控不力。要了解空调对重症患者造成的真正风险,需要对空调的结果进行更好的监控和严格的前瞻性评估。
{"title":"Arterial catheter outcomes in intensive care: An analysis of 1117 patients.","authors":"Samantha Keogh, Emily Larsen, Amanda Corley, Mari Takashima, Nicole Marsh, Melannie Edwards, Heather Reynolds, Jayesh Dhanani, Fiona Coyer, Kevin B Laupland, Claire M Rickard","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to arterial circulation through arterial catheters (ACs) is crucial for monitoring and decision-making in intensive care units (ICU) but carries the risk of complications including bloodstream infection (BSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from four randomised controlled trials in Australian ICUs, investigating the efficacy of different AC interventions. De-identified data were combined into a single dataset, and per-patient outcomes analysed. The primary outcome was AC-BSI, defined as laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI) type 1 or 2, with a concurrent local infection. All-cause AC failure was defined as any unplanned removal. AC infection and failure were reported as rates per 1000 catheter days and hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1117 adult patients were analysed. Mean age was 58.8 years (±16.6); and 41% (n = 462) were male. Median AC dwell time was 110 h (IQR 28.3-168.0). There was one case (<0.1%; 0.18/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.03-1.29]) of AC-BSI, and 14 cases of LCBI (1%; 13 LCBI-1 and 1 LCBI-2; 2.54/1000 catheter days [95% CI 1.51-4.30]). LCBI were most commonly Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. There were four cases of local infection (<1%; 0.73/1000 catheter days [95% CI 0.27-1.94]). Overall AC failure rate was 13% (n = 146) or 26.53/1000 catheter days (95% CI 22.56-31.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified a relatively low incidence of complications. This is likely reflective of poor monitoring of ACs in intensive care. Better surveillance and a rigorous prospective evaluation of AC outcomes is required to understand the true risk ACs pose to critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}