Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-04DOI: 10.1111/inm.13482
Nora Ambord, Christian Burr, Gianfranco Zuaboni
Recovery Colleges are mental health education centres co-produced by experts with lived experience with mental health problems and mental health professionals. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a Recovery College in Switzerland on its students' mental health measured through personal recovery, well-being and self-stigmatisation in a mixed methods approach following the MMARS guideline. Three standardised questionnaires 'Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery', 'WHO-5 Well-Being Index' and 'Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale Short Form' were completed by 92 participants as part of a pre-post-evaluation while two focus groups (n = 10) provided further explanations regarding impacts on the three topics. Statistical analyses include paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank tests for pre-post-test comparisons as well as Cohen's d to determine effect sizes. For all three questionnaires, significant improvement was shown in the desired direction with low to medium effect sizes. A higher number of courses attended did not result in higher scores in the outcome measurements. The qualitative analysis confirmed these results by providing insights of specific aspects of these positive impacts. These include increased social inclusion, improvement in attitudes towards one's life and identity, increased engagement in hobbies and healthy behaviours, positive impacts on well-being and decreased self-stigmatisation. The findings indicate that Recovery Colleges should be made available continuously and further developed also in other regions of Switzerland. Similar projects require continuous evaluation in early development to ensure effectiveness and improve quality.
{"title":"A Glimmer of Hope: The Impact of the Recovery College Bern on Personal Recovery, Well-Being and Self-Stigmatisation-A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Nora Ambord, Christian Burr, Gianfranco Zuaboni","doi":"10.1111/inm.13482","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recovery Colleges are mental health education centres co-produced by experts with lived experience with mental health problems and mental health professionals. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a Recovery College in Switzerland on its students' mental health measured through personal recovery, well-being and self-stigmatisation in a mixed methods approach following the MMARS guideline. Three standardised questionnaires 'Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery', 'WHO-5 Well-Being Index' and 'Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale Short Form' were completed by 92 participants as part of a pre-post-evaluation while two focus groups (n = 10) provided further explanations regarding impacts on the three topics. Statistical analyses include paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank tests for pre-post-test comparisons as well as Cohen's d to determine effect sizes. For all three questionnaires, significant improvement was shown in the desired direction with low to medium effect sizes. A higher number of courses attended did not result in higher scores in the outcome measurements. The qualitative analysis confirmed these results by providing insights of specific aspects of these positive impacts. These include increased social inclusion, improvement in attitudes towards one's life and identity, increased engagement in hobbies and healthy behaviours, positive impacts on well-being and decreased self-stigmatisation. The findings indicate that Recovery Colleges should be made available continuously and further developed also in other regions of Switzerland. Similar projects require continuous evaluation in early development to ensure effectiveness and improve quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663831/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1111/inm.13413
J H Broadbear, M G Bhagwandas, S Crowley, L Cheney, S Rao
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is often perceived as being more common in females, since women are more likely to seek help and be diagnosed. However, epidemiological studies have reported no sex differences in community prevalence. The purpose of this study was to learn from the narrative journeys of men who have received a diagnosis of BPD. Eight men participated, mean age 45.9 years (range 27-73 years). Recruitment was through clinician referrals at the study site and via social media and website advertising. Participants consented to a 60-90-min semi-structured interview via an audio-visual digital platform. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Three themes were identified: (i) The Emergence of Symptoms, (ii) Reaching Crisis Point and (iii) Receiving a Diagnosis. Participants reported many adverse experiences during childhood and adolescence. Early symptoms were often exacerbated by emotionally invalidating caregiving. Participants reported seeking mental health support only after reaching a crisis point, which often arose following an employment-related stressor. Participants typically initiated help-seeking by consulting a General Practitioner. Long delays were reported from initial help-seeking to being diagnosed with BPD; all expressed relief upon diagnosis. The findings highlight the deleterious consequences of emotional invalidation in participants' mental health and their capacity to access timely support. General Practitioners play a critical role in identifying probable symptoms of BPD in men and are the gateway to referral to psychiatrists and psychologists. It is vital that education is provided to assist their important work.
{"title":"Exploring the Pathways to Diagnosis for Men With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"J H Broadbear, M G Bhagwandas, S Crowley, L Cheney, S Rao","doi":"10.1111/inm.13413","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is often perceived as being more common in females, since women are more likely to seek help and be diagnosed. However, epidemiological studies have reported no sex differences in community prevalence. The purpose of this study was to learn from the narrative journeys of men who have received a diagnosis of BPD. Eight men participated, mean age 45.9 years (range 27-73 years). Recruitment was through clinician referrals at the study site and via social media and website advertising. Participants consented to a 60-90-min semi-structured interview via an audio-visual digital platform. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Three themes were identified: (i) The Emergence of Symptoms, (ii) Reaching Crisis Point and (iii) Receiving a Diagnosis. Participants reported many adverse experiences during childhood and adolescence. Early symptoms were often exacerbated by emotionally invalidating caregiving. Participants reported seeking mental health support only after reaching a crisis point, which often arose following an employment-related stressor. Participants typically initiated help-seeking by consulting a General Practitioner. Long delays were reported from initial help-seeking to being diagnosed with BPD; all expressed relief upon diagnosis. The findings highlight the deleterious consequences of emotional invalidation in participants' mental health and their capacity to access timely support. General Practitioners play a critical role in identifying probable symptoms of BPD in men and are the gateway to referral to psychiatrists and psychologists. It is vital that education is provided to assist their important work.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751761/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-11DOI: 10.1111/inm.13451
Tari Forrester-Bowling, James J Lucas, Andrew D Brown, Stephanie Bennetts, Renae Carolin, Josh Hayward, Debbie Scott, Anna Peeters, James McLure
Countries around the world are experiencing both a growing need for mental health services and major gaps in the delivery of mental healthcare. The World Health Organisation's 2022 report on mental health emphasised co-designed and systems-level innovations responsive to the voice of those with lived experience. However, evidence for implementing such methodologies is sparse. Group model building (GMB), a participatory systems-based approach, has been used in various fields, but its application is limited within mental healthcare settings. It is recognised as a valuable tool for engaging stakeholders, including those with lived experience, in understanding and redesigning health systems and services. The participatory approach aligns with the mental health sector's shift towards co-design and person-centred care. This study assessed the acceptability of GMB as a method for co-design within mental healthcare, aiming to explore its potential for meaningful collaborative improvement and systems-level insights. Participants from a regional Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Service (MHDAS) engaged in GMB workshops and focus groups. Eighteen individuals, including lived experience workers and healthcare professionals, provided feedback that informed adjustments to the workshops' design, language, timing and facilitation techniques, enhancing GMB's relevance for mental health co-design. The findings demonstrate the value and acceptability of the adapted GMB process in acute mental healthcare, marking a significant step towards evidence-based, person-centred service improvement. This study highlights the potential effectiveness of participatory methods in identifying and addressing systemic challenges, paving the way for future mental health reforms. Future work will focus on implementing and evaluating co-designed interventions, aiming for more inclusive and effective mental healthcare and advancing innovation and reform in the field.
{"title":"Adapting Group Model Building for Mental Healthcare: A Participatory Co-Design Approach.","authors":"Tari Forrester-Bowling, James J Lucas, Andrew D Brown, Stephanie Bennetts, Renae Carolin, Josh Hayward, Debbie Scott, Anna Peeters, James McLure","doi":"10.1111/inm.13451","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Countries around the world are experiencing both a growing need for mental health services and major gaps in the delivery of mental healthcare. The World Health Organisation's 2022 report on mental health emphasised co-designed and systems-level innovations responsive to the voice of those with lived experience. However, evidence for implementing such methodologies is sparse. Group model building (GMB), a participatory systems-based approach, has been used in various fields, but its application is limited within mental healthcare settings. It is recognised as a valuable tool for engaging stakeholders, including those with lived experience, in understanding and redesigning health systems and services. The participatory approach aligns with the mental health sector's shift towards co-design and person-centred care. This study assessed the acceptability of GMB as a method for co-design within mental healthcare, aiming to explore its potential for meaningful collaborative improvement and systems-level insights. Participants from a regional Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Service (MHDAS) engaged in GMB workshops and focus groups. Eighteen individuals, including lived experience workers and healthcare professionals, provided feedback that informed adjustments to the workshops' design, language, timing and facilitation techniques, enhancing GMB's relevance for mental health co-design. The findings demonstrate the value and acceptability of the adapted GMB process in acute mental healthcare, marking a significant step towards evidence-based, person-centred service improvement. This study highlights the potential effectiveness of participatory methods in identifying and addressing systemic challenges, paving the way for future mental health reforms. Future work will focus on implementing and evaluating co-designed interventions, aiming for more inclusive and effective mental healthcare and advancing innovation and reform in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142407398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Family caregivers of persons with mild cognitive impairment attempt to understand the behavioural and functional changes exhibited by their relative. However, how caregivers respond to initial changes and changes over time has not been explored. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experience of family caregivers responding to changes in their relative's memory, behaviours, and physical functions over 2 years. Eleven family caregivers of a relative with mild cognitive impairment were purposively recruited from neurological clinics in Taiwan. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted within 6-months of referral; three follow-ups were conducted at 6-month intervals. Content analysis of 41 transcribed audio-recorded interviews revealed the longitudinal changes in their relative with cognitive impairment was made caregiving challenging. Three themes described the challenges: (1) Changes related to their relative's cognitive impairment, which included increases in mood fluctuations, erratic behaviours, and reductions in physical abilities; (2) changes in their relative's comorbidities, which included adapting to new symptoms and treatments for a chronic disease, monitoring medication adherence and drug interactions; and (3) changes in caregiver burden, which increased levels of stress, uncertainty, and anxiety resulting in greater role strain. Caregiving became more challenging with time, especially caregivers whose relative developed dementia during the study period. These findings offer insight into the trajectory of the experience of family caregivers attempting to understand changes in cognition, behaviours, and physical functions for their relative with mild cognitive impairment over 2 years, which could help mental healthcare providers develop support services to reduce caregiver role strain.
{"title":"Challenges for Family Caregivers of Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Li-Min Kuo, Ching-Lin Wang, Huei-Ling Huang, Wen-Chuin Hsu, Yea-Ing L Shyu","doi":"10.1111/inm.13459","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family caregivers of persons with mild cognitive impairment attempt to understand the behavioural and functional changes exhibited by their relative. However, how caregivers respond to initial changes and changes over time has not been explored. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experience of family caregivers responding to changes in their relative's memory, behaviours, and physical functions over 2 years. Eleven family caregivers of a relative with mild cognitive impairment were purposively recruited from neurological clinics in Taiwan. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted within 6-months of referral; three follow-ups were conducted at 6-month intervals. Content analysis of 41 transcribed audio-recorded interviews revealed the longitudinal changes in their relative with cognitive impairment was made caregiving challenging. Three themes described the challenges: (1) Changes related to their relative's cognitive impairment, which included increases in mood fluctuations, erratic behaviours, and reductions in physical abilities; (2) changes in their relative's comorbidities, which included adapting to new symptoms and treatments for a chronic disease, monitoring medication adherence and drug interactions; and (3) changes in caregiver burden, which increased levels of stress, uncertainty, and anxiety resulting in greater role strain. Caregiving became more challenging with time, especially caregivers whose relative developed dementia during the study period. These findings offer insight into the trajectory of the experience of family caregivers attempting to understand changes in cognition, behaviours, and physical functions for their relative with mild cognitive impairment over 2 years, which could help mental healthcare providers develop support services to reduce caregiver role strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142515362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-04DOI: 10.1111/inm.13479
Zelalem Belayneh, Den-Ching A Lee, Terry P Haines, Deborah Oyine Aluh, Justus Uchenna Onu, Giles Newton-Howes, Kim Masters, Yoav Kohn, Jacqueline Sin, Marie-Hélène Goulet, Tonje Lossius Husum, Eleni Jelastopulu, Maria Bakola, Tim Opgenhaffen, Guru S Gowda, Birhanie Mekuriaw, Kathleen De Cuyper, Eimear Muir-Cochrane, Yana Canteloupe, Emer Diviney, Vincent S Staggs, Melissa Petrakis
There is a global initiative to reduce the use of restrictive care practices in mental health settings. Variations in the reported rates across regions complicate the understanding of their use and tracking trends over time. However, it remains unclear whether these discrepancies reflect real differences in the implementation of these practices or are sourced from inconsistencies in incident classification and reporting methods. This study employed a co-design approach to identify contexts that would influence the classification and reporting of restrictive care practices. The research involved 29 mental health stakeholders, including 22 professional experts from 13 countries across Europe, Africa, North America, Asia and Australasia and seven service users and family carers from Australia. Recruitment was conducted through email invitations, snowball sampling and social media outreach. Six web-based panel meetings, each lasting 90-120 minnutes were held. These discussions focused on exploring various contexts that might lead to uncertainty among professionals when classifying and reporting actions whether or not as restrictive care practices. A final list of 23 contexts was identified and considered for the development of 81 case scenario items. Finally, all the 29 panel members selected 44 from 81 case scenarios for inclusion in an upcoming international survey to examine variations in the classification and reporting of restrictive care practices. The findings from this co-design work emphasise the involvement of a wide range of factors and contexts in the classification and reporting of restrictive care practices that may contribute to the observed variations in the in the reported rates of these practices. The case scenarios developed in this study will support future research and serve educational purposes, illustrating real-life situations in the mental healthcare context.
{"title":"Co-Designing Case Scenarios and Survey Strategies to Examine the Classification and Reporting of Restrictive Care Practices in Adult Mental Health Inpatient Settings: Perspectives From International Stakeholders.","authors":"Zelalem Belayneh, Den-Ching A Lee, Terry P Haines, Deborah Oyine Aluh, Justus Uchenna Onu, Giles Newton-Howes, Kim Masters, Yoav Kohn, Jacqueline Sin, Marie-Hélène Goulet, Tonje Lossius Husum, Eleni Jelastopulu, Maria Bakola, Tim Opgenhaffen, Guru S Gowda, Birhanie Mekuriaw, Kathleen De Cuyper, Eimear Muir-Cochrane, Yana Canteloupe, Emer Diviney, Vincent S Staggs, Melissa Petrakis","doi":"10.1111/inm.13479","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a global initiative to reduce the use of restrictive care practices in mental health settings. Variations in the reported rates across regions complicate the understanding of their use and tracking trends over time. However, it remains unclear whether these discrepancies reflect real differences in the implementation of these practices or are sourced from inconsistencies in incident classification and reporting methods. This study employed a co-design approach to identify contexts that would influence the classification and reporting of restrictive care practices. The research involved 29 mental health stakeholders, including 22 professional experts from 13 countries across Europe, Africa, North America, Asia and Australasia and seven service users and family carers from Australia. Recruitment was conducted through email invitations, snowball sampling and social media outreach. Six web-based panel meetings, each lasting 90-120 minnutes were held. These discussions focused on exploring various contexts that might lead to uncertainty among professionals when classifying and reporting actions whether or not as restrictive care practices. A final list of 23 contexts was identified and considered for the development of 81 case scenario items. Finally, all the 29 panel members selected 44 from 81 case scenarios for inclusion in an upcoming international survey to examine variations in the classification and reporting of restrictive care practices. The findings from this co-design work emphasise the involvement of a wide range of factors and contexts in the classification and reporting of restrictive care practices that may contribute to the observed variations in the in the reported rates of these practices. The case scenarios developed in this study will support future research and serve educational purposes, illustrating real-life situations in the mental healthcare context.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1111/inm.13441
Nick Overpelt, Nienke Kool-Goudzwaard, Barbara Stringer, Berno van Meijel
Therapeutic relationships are critical in the treatment of mental health disorders. Some clients experiencing mental health disorders display conflict behaviour-for example, suicidal or self-harming behaviour, threats of or actual aggression, and various psychotic behaviours-which presents significant challenges for care professionals. In inpatient mental health units, where interactions with mental health nurses are frequent, managing conflict behaviour is crucial to maintaining care quality and fostering therapeutic progress. This study aims to describe nurses' perspectives on fostering therapeutic relationships while working with clients who display conflict behaviour. Qualitative research was conducted in a specialised treatment setting for such clients by means of individual semi-structured interviews and a focus group interview with nurses. The results show that the nurses' primary focus is on cooperating with clients and colleagues. Regardless of conflict behaviour, nurses consistently invite clients to cooperate. To do so, they must manage their own emotions and expectations, emphasise the clients' responsibility and reduce the opportunities for conflict behaviour. The unit structure helps nurses by reducing ambiguity regarding treatment policies and inconsistencies in nurse-client interactions and allows nurses and clients to experience feelings of safety. To work with conflict behaviour, nurses need to feel valued and supported by their colleagues and have adequate time and resources. In conclusion, this study shows how nurses foster therapeutic relationships with clients who display conflict behaviour by focusing on cooperation, structure and safety.
{"title":"Nurses' Perspectives on Fostering Therapeutic Relationships While Working With Clients Who Display Conflict Behaviour.","authors":"Nick Overpelt, Nienke Kool-Goudzwaard, Barbara Stringer, Berno van Meijel","doi":"10.1111/inm.13441","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13441","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic relationships are critical in the treatment of mental health disorders. Some clients experiencing mental health disorders display conflict behaviour-for example, suicidal or self-harming behaviour, threats of or actual aggression, and various psychotic behaviours-which presents significant challenges for care professionals. In inpatient mental health units, where interactions with mental health nurses are frequent, managing conflict behaviour is crucial to maintaining care quality and fostering therapeutic progress. This study aims to describe nurses' perspectives on fostering therapeutic relationships while working with clients who display conflict behaviour. Qualitative research was conducted in a specialised treatment setting for such clients by means of individual semi-structured interviews and a focus group interview with nurses. The results show that the nurses' primary focus is on cooperating with clients and colleagues. Regardless of conflict behaviour, nurses consistently invite clients to cooperate. To do so, they must manage their own emotions and expectations, emphasise the clients' responsibility and reduce the opportunities for conflict behaviour. The unit structure helps nurses by reducing ambiguity regarding treatment policies and inconsistencies in nurse-client interactions and allows nurses and clients to experience feelings of safety. To work with conflict behaviour, nurses need to feel valued and supported by their colleagues and have adequate time and resources. In conclusion, this study shows how nurses foster therapeutic relationships with clients who display conflict behaviour by focusing on cooperation, structure and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Victorian government's Alcohol and other drugs (AOD) workforce policy calls for greater recruitment of alcohol and other drugs nurse practitioners (AODNPs). However, frontline organisations in Victoria report several systemic barriers to their recruitment and retention. Additionally, there is scant Australian literature that examines the experiences of AODNP in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) provision in regional/rural areas. This research aims to address this gap by examining the AODNP workforce issues in delivering pharmacotherapy treatments in regional/rural areas of Victoria. Using an interpretative phenomenological approach, we conducted qualitative, in-depth interviews with 11 OAT prescribing AODNP's working in regional or rural Victoria. We analysed transcripts using reflective thematic analysis and generated three themes: (1) Professional motivations and values, (2) Enablers to professional role and (3) Barriers to professional role. The findings suggest that AODNPs in regional/rural areas are a dedicated workforce who provide holistic and integrated care for OAT clients. AODNPs play an important role in reducing and providing timely and subsidised health care for OAT clients living in regional/rural locations. AODNPs face many systemic and organisational barriers. These include inadequate funding for AODNP positions to prescribe pharmacotherapy treatments, lack of understanding of the AODNP professional role at the executive/management level within organisations and irregular access to supervision, mentoring, training and education. Also, endemic stigma in the health system acts as a barrier in recruiting and supporting AODNP positions that focus on care for OAT clients.
{"title":"Banging My Head Against a Brick Wall! Enablers and Barriers to Nurse Practitioners Delivering Opioid Agonist Treatments in Regional/Rural Victoria, Australia.","authors":"Tejaswini Patil, Jana Dostal, Suzanne Nielsen, Niels Buus, Pauline Molloy, Ferghal Armstrong, Jessica Coventry, Aron Shlonsky","doi":"10.1111/inm.13434","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13434","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Victorian government's Alcohol and other drugs (AOD) workforce policy calls for greater recruitment of alcohol and other drugs nurse practitioners (AODNPs). However, frontline organisations in Victoria report several systemic barriers to their recruitment and retention. Additionally, there is scant Australian literature that examines the experiences of AODNP in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) provision in regional/rural areas. This research aims to address this gap by examining the AODNP workforce issues in delivering pharmacotherapy treatments in regional/rural areas of Victoria. Using an interpretative phenomenological approach, we conducted qualitative, in-depth interviews with 11 OAT prescribing AODNP's working in regional or rural Victoria. We analysed transcripts using reflective thematic analysis and generated three themes: (1) Professional motivations and values, (2) Enablers to professional role and (3) Barriers to professional role. The findings suggest that AODNPs in regional/rural areas are a dedicated workforce who provide holistic and integrated care for OAT clients. AODNPs play an important role in reducing and providing timely and subsidised health care for OAT clients living in regional/rural locations. AODNPs face many systemic and organisational barriers. These include inadequate funding for AODNP positions to prescribe pharmacotherapy treatments, lack of understanding of the AODNP professional role at the executive/management level within organisations and irregular access to supervision, mentoring, training and education. Also, endemic stigma in the health system acts as a barrier in recruiting and supporting AODNP positions that focus on care for OAT clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142515361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-27DOI: 10.1111/inm.13463
Joshua McDonough, Kate Rhodes, Nicholas Procter
Clinical supervision is a psychologically safe practice that aims to provide support and training for workers within the healthcare industry, including mental health nurses. Over the years, clinical supervision has been cited as a practice to improve workforce outcomes for both individual mental health nurses and the organisations they work in. The aim of this scoping review is to examine the evidence exploring the relationship between clinical supervision and workforce outcomes for mental health nurses. Twenty-eight articles sourced from six databases were included in this study. The most frequently evaluated workforce outcomes were competence (n = 14), workplace culture (n = 13) and compassion (n = 7). Studies reported that the association between clinical supervision and workforce outcomes was predominantly positive, but there were mixed results for competence, workplace culture, job satisfaction and burnout. Details on the type of clinical supervision received by participants were limited, and most of the evidence included in this review included qualitative research and participants self-reporting their perceived benefits from clinical supervision, as opposed to using validated instruments in experimental and/or longitudinal study designs. Organisations should be hesitant to implement mandatory clinical supervision within workplaces, as this could have the opposite effect on workforce outcomes for mental health nurses who are already time-poor and overworked, as well as those who are indifferent or hostile to clinical supervision.
{"title":"The Impact of Clinical Supervision on the Mental Health Nursing Workforce: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Joshua McDonough, Kate Rhodes, Nicholas Procter","doi":"10.1111/inm.13463","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13463","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical supervision is a psychologically safe practice that aims to provide support and training for workers within the healthcare industry, including mental health nurses. Over the years, clinical supervision has been cited as a practice to improve workforce outcomes for both individual mental health nurses and the organisations they work in. The aim of this scoping review is to examine the evidence exploring the relationship between clinical supervision and workforce outcomes for mental health nurses. Twenty-eight articles sourced from six databases were included in this study. The most frequently evaluated workforce outcomes were competence (n = 14), workplace culture (n = 13) and compassion (n = 7). Studies reported that the association between clinical supervision and workforce outcomes was predominantly positive, but there were mixed results for competence, workplace culture, job satisfaction and burnout. Details on the type of clinical supervision received by participants were limited, and most of the evidence included in this review included qualitative research and participants self-reporting their perceived benefits from clinical supervision, as opposed to using validated instruments in experimental and/or longitudinal study designs. Organisations should be hesitant to implement mandatory clinical supervision within workplaces, as this could have the opposite effect on workforce outcomes for mental health nurses who are already time-poor and overworked, as well as those who are indifferent or hostile to clinical supervision.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142515312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1111/inm.13418
Ying Ling Li, Lien-Chung Wei
{"title":"Addressing Diagnostic Overshadowing in Hepatitis C Care for People With Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Integrated Care Model in Taiwan.","authors":"Ying Ling Li, Lien-Chung Wei","doi":"10.1111/inm.13418","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13418","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1111/inm.13440
Jie Fu, Jianwen Zhu, Jiajia Dong, Yang Wang, Sizhe Wang, Xia Zhang, Lu Wen, Hong Fan
Severe mental illnesses (SMIs) represent a significant public health challenge with substantial personal, economic and societal burdens. Despite treatment advances, recovery outcomes for SMI patients remain variable. This study aimed to investigate the influence of personal and psychosocial factors on recovery among SMI patients in community health settings. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 23 community health service centres in Nanjing, China. We recruited 924 participants diagnosed with SMIs, using a random sampling method. The relationships between individual, psychosocial factors and patients' recovery status were analysed by multiple linear regression. The mediation effect of medication adherence was further tested by the Sobel test with bootstrapping. The mean score of the Morningside Rehabilitation Status Scale (MRSS) of 924 patients with SMIs was 49.82 ± 41.52. The main influencing personal factors of recovery status were age, marital status, education, average annual income and duration of illness. Patients who were accepted by their families tended to have better recovery outcomes, while stigma and social impairment may hinder recovery. Medication adherence played a mediating role between psychosocial factors and recovery status. This study highlights the crucial role of psychosocial factors in the treatment and recovery of SMI patients. Furthermore, medication adherence emerged as a mediating factor. Implementing targeted interventions and policies addressing identified psychosocial barriers can offer promising avenues for improving recovery outcomes for SMI patients in community settings.
{"title":"Recovery From Severe Mental Illnesses: The Influence of Personal and Psychosocial Factors in Community Settings.","authors":"Jie Fu, Jianwen Zhu, Jiajia Dong, Yang Wang, Sizhe Wang, Xia Zhang, Lu Wen, Hong Fan","doi":"10.1111/inm.13440","DOIUrl":"10.1111/inm.13440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe mental illnesses (SMIs) represent a significant public health challenge with substantial personal, economic and societal burdens. Despite treatment advances, recovery outcomes for SMI patients remain variable. This study aimed to investigate the influence of personal and psychosocial factors on recovery among SMI patients in community health settings. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 23 community health service centres in Nanjing, China. We recruited 924 participants diagnosed with SMIs, using a random sampling method. The relationships between individual, psychosocial factors and patients' recovery status were analysed by multiple linear regression. The mediation effect of medication adherence was further tested by the Sobel test with bootstrapping. The mean score of the Morningside Rehabilitation Status Scale (MRSS) of 924 patients with SMIs was 49.82 ± 41.52. The main influencing personal factors of recovery status were age, marital status, education, average annual income and duration of illness. Patients who were accepted by their families tended to have better recovery outcomes, while stigma and social impairment may hinder recovery. Medication adherence played a mediating role between psychosocial factors and recovery status. This study highlights the crucial role of psychosocial factors in the treatment and recovery of SMI patients. Furthermore, medication adherence emerged as a mediating factor. Implementing targeted interventions and policies addressing identified psychosocial barriers can offer promising avenues for improving recovery outcomes for SMI patients in community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mental health nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e13440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}