Background: Sepsis is a potentially life-threatening condition that eventually causes multi-organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a widespread and severe threatening complication of sepsis, a condition termed sepsis-induced AKI (S-AKI), with poor clinical outcomes and high mortality rates. Inflammatory and immunological responses are important variables in S-AKI. This study aimed to examine the relationship of rs1518111 polymorphism in the interleukin-10 ( IL-10 ) gene and serum/urine IL-10 levels with sepsis-induced AKI in critically ill patients in the ICU.
Methods and results: In this cross-sectional study, 310 critically ill adult patients were recruited, of whom, 197 developed S-AKI. Real-time PCR was performed to detect the rs1518111 polymorphism. Circulating blood and urine IL-10 levels of IL-10 were measured. For rs1518111 SNP, the presence of at least one T allele increased the risk of occurrence of S-AKI in critically ill patients with sepsis (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07-3.17; p ˂ 0.001), regardless of the type of infection and severity of sepsis. Blood and urine IL-10 levels were an excellent prediction of S-AKI (AUC: 0.881 and 0.953 and sensitivity: 90.2% and 97.6% at cutoff 133.5 and 5.67 pg/mL, respectively). Regression analysis showed that WBC count and increased blood and urine IL-10 levels, in addition to the presence of TT genotype, are independent risk factors for AKI.
Conclusion: rs1518111 polymorphism in the IL-10 gene is a risk factor for sepsis-induced AKI in the ICU. Serum/urine IL-10 markers may be used as early predictors of S-AKI in critically ill patients with sepsis, thereby improving early management.
Background: Many patients with obesity in Taiwan seek Chinese herbal medicines (CHM) from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinics. This study aimed to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in adults diagnosed with obesity, with or without CHM.
Methods: Patients with obesity aged 18 to 50 years were identified using diagnostic codes from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 2008 and 2018. We randomized 67,655 patients with or without CHM using propensity score matching. All patients were followed up from the start of the study until MACEs, death, or the end of 2018. A Cox proportional regression model was used to evaluate the hazard ratios of MACEs in the CHM and non-CHM cohorts.
Results: During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, the CHM group had a higher incidence of MACEs than the non-CHM control cohort (9.35 versus 8.27 per 1,000 person-years). The CHM group had a 1.13-fold higher risk of MACEs compared with the non-CHM control (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.19; p <0.001), especially in ischemic stroke (aHR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07-1.31; p <0.01), arrhythmia (aHR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.14-1.38; p <0.001), and young adults aged 18 to 29 years (aHR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.05-1.43; p <0.001).
Conclusion: Although certain CHMs offer cardiovascular benefits, young and middle-aged obese adults receiving CHM exhibit a higher risk of MACEs than those not receiving CHM. Therefore, TCM practitioners should be cautious when prescribing medications to young patients with obesity, considering their potential cardiovascular risks.
Background: This study evaluated the long-term acoustic and subjective outcomes of Bonebridge bone conduction implant (BCI) 601 implantation in Taiwanese microtia patients with aural atresia (AA).
Methods: A total of 41 microtia patients (26 with bilateral AA and 15 with unilateral AA) who received Bonebridge BCI 601 implantation between December 2014 and March 2021 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, were included in this retrospective study. Acoustic outcomes, including the functional hearing gain (FHG), speech reception threshold (SRT), and word recognition score (WRS), were assessed. Subjective outcomes were assessed using the Chinese versions of four questionnaires: the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB); the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale; the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids; and the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living.
Results: The mean follow-up duration was 6.3 years (range, 2.8-9.1). The mean unaided air conduction pure tone average (PTA4) was 65.3 ± 8.8 decibels (dB) hearing level (HL) and the mean aided sound field PTA4 was 31.1 ± 9.1 dB HL, resulting in a FHG of 34.2 ± 11.7 dB HL (p < 0.05). After Bonebridge implantation, the mean SRT in quiet, SRT in noise, WRS in quiet, and WRS in noise improved from 58.3 ± 7.4 dB HL to 29.4 ± 7.0 dB HL, from -1.4 ± 7.3 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to -9.6 ± 5.4 dB SNR, from 46.4 ± 26.9% to 93.8 ± 3.1%, and from 46.7 ± 21.8% to 72.7 ± 19.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). Additionally, the bilateral AA group exhibited greater SRT and WRS improvements compared to the unilateral AA group (p < 0.05). All mean subscale scores in the four questionnaires showed improvement after Bonebridge implantation, except for the mean aversiveness to sounds subscale score in the APHAB questionnaire.
Conclusion: Bonebridge BCI 601 implantation provided long-term acoustic and subjective benefits to microtia patients with AA, particularly those with bilateral AA.
Background: Surgical resection (SR) is the main treatment for small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), but it increases metabolic demand, systemic inflammation, and digestive dysfunction, resulting in major impacts on the postoperative outcomes of patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of the postoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a surrogate marker of inflammation and nutrition, in patients with SBA after resection.
Methods: From June 2014 to March 2022, 44 consecutive patients who underwent SR for SBA in Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Factors associated with survival including PNI were analyzed.
Results: PNI decreased in patients after SR for SBA (median change: -1.82), particularly in those who underwent Whipple operation or developed postoperative pancreatic fistula. Postoperative PNI <45.2 best predicted overall survival (OS) (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.826, p = 0.001). Patients with lower postoperative PNI had significantly worse OS compared to those with higher postoperative values (median OS: 19.3 months vs not reached, p < 0.001). Low postoperative PNI (hazard ratio [HR]: 11.404, p = 0.002), tumoral lymphovascular invasion (HR: 8.023, p = 0.012), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.055, p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for OS. Postoperative PNI also significantly predicted recurrence-free survival independent of lymphovascular invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 6.705, p = 0.001).
Conclusion: PNI commonly decreases in patients with SBA who undergo Whipple surgery or develop postoperative pancreatic fistula. Postoperative PNI independently predicts survival and may serve as a clinical marker to optimize patient outcomes.
Background: The effects of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) with additional distal bare metal stents (BMSs) in patients with subacute complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) are unclear and are investigated in this retrospective study.
Methods: The medical records of 67 patients who received TEVAR due to subacute cTBAD were reviewed. Areas of true lumen (TL) and false lumen at five levels-pulmonary artery (PA), diaphragm, renal artery (RA), middle of the infrarenal aorta, and aortic bifurcation-were measured using computed tomography before and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The TL ratio (TL area/total aortic area) and total aortic area at each time point were compared between the TEVAR + BMS (n = 37) and TEVAR-only (n = 30) groups. The effects of BMS use and time were evaluated using generalized estimating equations and generalized linear regression models.
Results: Baseline characteristics, remodeling types, and clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperative TL ratios at the diaphragm and RA were significantly higher in the TEVAR + BMS group than in the TEVAR-only group ( p < 0.05). BMS use and time had significant interaction effects at the PA, diaphragm, and RA (all p < 0.05), but effects on total aortic area were not significant at any of the five parts. TL ratios at the diaphragm and RA exhibited greater improvement in the TEVAR + BMS group than in the TEVAR-only group at postoperative months 6 and 12 (all p < 0.001). Aortic diameters at all five parts were significantly smaller in the TEVAR + BMS group than in the TEVAR-only group (all p < 0.05).
Conclusion: In patients with subacute cTBAD, TEVAR with BMS implantation effectively expands the TL from the thoracic aorta to the RA but neither enhances aortic remodeling nor elicits any change in total aortic area in whole dissected aorta relative to TEVAR only.