The Journal of dermatology最新文献

Our objective was to establish consensus on (1) which patients with plaque psoriasis and limited skin involvement (body surface area [BSA] <10%) are suitable for systemic treatment, and (2) a definition of 'topical therapy failure'. A steering committee refined 13 statements drawn from literature related to the study objectives. An independent panel of 45 clinical experts from Japan indicated their agreement to each statement using a 10-point Likert scale (Round 1; strong consensus, ≥70% of responses = 7-10 and median value ≥8). The steering committee reviewed Round 1 results and refined the statements for Round 2, as necessary. In Round 2, the panel indicated their agreement to each statement using a 3-point scale (strong consensus, ≥70% of responses and median value of 3) and were shown Round 1 responses before voting. Forty-five clinicians participated in Round 1 and 41 of those (91%) participated in Round 2. Consensus was achieved on the criteria of eligibility for systemic treatment among patients with limited skin involvement as disease involvement at special or difficult to treat areas, psoriasis-induced psychological distress, uncontrolled symptoms (e.g., scaling, bleeding, pruritus, insomnia) affecting their social life, psoriatic arthritis, or failure of topical therapy. Consensus on criteria for topical failure were persistent symptoms (e.g., itchiness, pain) and plaques, poor patient satisfaction with treatment, a need to increase medication quantity or application time after treatment with two topicals for 4 weeks; or if the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score of >3 or Physician Global Assessment Score of ≥2 after 8 weeks treatment. Our Delphi panel proposes criteria to help physicians identify patients with psoriasis and limited skin involvement who would benefit from systemic therapy and suggests a definition for topical therapy 'failure' which could indicate a move to systemic treatment is warranted.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with intense pruritic nodules. The unclear patho-etiological mechanisms of PN cause difficulty in disease management; and there is a paucity of information on the current diagnosis and treatment options for PN in Japan. To describe the current management from a dermatologists' perspective we conducted a web-based survey (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000047643) in 2022 among dermatologists from a Japanese commercially available physician panel, who had seen at least one patient with PN within the last 3 months. The survey included 117 dermatologists. The dermatologists diagnosed PN mainly by confirming clinical signs and patient interviews, while to assess the severity of PN, the number of pruritic nodules and the degree of itching were primarily utilized. Topical corticosteroids and antihistamines were the most used drugs, as recommended in the current guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of prurigo. Dermatologists' treatment satisfaction decreased with increasing assumed severity of PN; almost 65% dermatologists were not satisfied with the treatment of severe PN. These results suggest the need of more effective medications and diagnostic tools for better management of PN in Japan.

High androgen hormone exposure in intrauterine life is held to be responsible for the etiopathogenesis of both acne vulgaris (AV) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of ADHD in AV patients. Patients between the ages of 12 and 17, diagnosed with AV and a control group were included in the study. The Conners-Wells Adolescent Self-Report Scale-Long Form (CASS-L) was applied to both groups to determine the severity of the ADHD. Ninety-eight patients diagnosed with AV and 96 healthy controls participated in the study. All parameters of the CASS-L were found to be significantly higher in AV patients compared to the control group. In addition, with the severity of the Global Acne Grading System, a positive low level among conduct problems (r = 0.223), cognitive problems (r = 0.271), ADHD index (r = 0.238), inattention (r = 0.238), and a positive moderate level among hyperactivity (r = 0.349), hyperactivity-impulsivity (r = 0.414), and total score (r = 0.429). According to our results, patients diagnosed with AV were more prone to ADHD than the control group. Our study showed that adolescent patients diagnosed with AV were more prone to ADHD than people of similar age and gender without a diagnosis of AV. It should be noted that AV is not only a dermatological disease but may also be accompanied by psychiatric morbidities.

Whether clinical and genetic markers can be used to differentiate patients with varying responses to different psoriasis therapies needs to be elucidated. Here, we assess whether human leukocyte antigen C (HLA-C)*06:02 is associated with response to biologics. Response to treatment was defined as a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score of ≤2 (PASI≤ 2) after 3 months. In total, 648 patients with psoriasis initiating treatment with biologics were included; 289 were HLA-C*06:02 positive and 359 were HLA-C*06:02 negative. Patients were treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (n = 469), interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors (n = 92), IL-17 inhibitors (n = 78), and IL-23 inhibitors (n = 9). Significantly more patients positive for HLA-C*06:02 achieved PASI≤ 2 compared with patients negative for HLA-C*06:02 when treated with IL-12/23 inhibitors. There was no significant difference between response in HLA-C*06:02 positive and negative patients for TNF inhibitors or IL-17 inhibitors. No analyses were conducted for IL-23 inhibitors because of the limited number of patients. The data confirm that HLA-C*06:02 may be used as a biomarker for response to anti-IL12/23 treatment.