Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-02DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03959-6
Hande Gencer, Anke-Christine Saß, Franziska Prütz
Health reporting (GBE) based on gender-sensitive indicators can provide information on gender inequalities, improve health promotion and healthcare, promote gender mainstreaming, and provide relevant information for gender equality measures. To date, there is no set of gender-sensitive health indicators for Federal Health Reporting at the Robert Koch Institute. As part of the Joint Action Prevent Non-Communicable Diseases, gender-sensitive health indicators are to be identified, evaluated, and integrated into the Robert Koch Institute's health reporting website in a pilot project. This is done in three work packages. In a scoping review, the available evidence on gender-sensitive health indicators and theoretical explanations for gender inequality in EU and OECD member states since 2014 will initially be assessed (work package 1). Building on this, identified indicators and explanatory approaches will be collated for evaluation and selection in a structured consensus process as part of a three-stage Delphi approach consisting of a focus group discussion and an online survey (work package 2). The evaluated indicator set will then be integrated into the Robert Koch Institute's health reporting website (work package 3). The results will be disseminated via scientific publications and conference presentations. An English full-text version of this article is available at SpingerLink as Supplementary Information.
{"title":"[Gender-sensitive health indicators for health reporting at the Robert Koch Institute (GBE-GI)-a pilot project as part of the Joint Action PreventNCD project].","authors":"Hande Gencer, Anke-Christine Saß, Franziska Prütz","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03959-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03959-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health reporting (GBE) based on gender-sensitive indicators can provide information on gender inequalities, improve health promotion and healthcare, promote gender mainstreaming, and provide relevant information for gender equality measures. To date, there is no set of gender-sensitive health indicators for Federal Health Reporting at the Robert Koch Institute. As part of the Joint Action Prevent Non-Communicable Diseases, gender-sensitive health indicators are to be identified, evaluated, and integrated into the Robert Koch Institute's health reporting website in a pilot project. This is done in three work packages. In a scoping review, the available evidence on gender-sensitive health indicators and theoretical explanations for gender inequality in EU and OECD member states since 2014 will initially be assessed (work package 1). Building on this, identified indicators and explanatory approaches will be collated for evaluation and selection in a structured consensus process as part of a three-stage Delphi approach consisting of a focus group discussion and an online survey (work package 2). The evaluated indicator set will then be integrated into the Robert Koch Institute's health reporting website (work package 3). The results will be disseminated via scientific publications and conference presentations. An English full-text version of this article is available at SpingerLink as Supplementary Information.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1315-1320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142362685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03952-z
Eva Milena Johanne Peters
Fatigue is a term that describes exhaustion as either physically measurable, usually muscular, or perceived. Fatigue as a condition is observed in a wide range of long-term stresses such as chronic infectious, autoimmune, or oncologic diseases as well as mental disorders. This article provides an overview of the currently known biopsychosocial interactions between fatigue, psychosocial stress, and immune response. It describes how chronic inflammatory processes and stress interact in fatigue and for which therapeutic approaches there is evidence to date.Given the current psychoneuroimmunological knowledge and the biopsychosocial model, both high physical and psychosocial stress can converge in neuroendocrine-immunological dysregulation. According to this model, symptoms of fatigue correspond to a chronically overactivated innate immune response. At the same time, chronic immune activation favors a misactivation of the learned immune response, which is dominated by (auto)antibody production and hyperactivated T lymphocytes. However, patients who report fatigue do not necessarily display immunological dysregulations. There is currently a need for research and education in order to identify patient subpopulations and specifically tailored treatment concepts to them.
疲劳是一个术语,用来描述身体上可测量到的疲惫(通常是肌肉疲劳)或感知到的疲惫。疲劳作为一种病症广泛存在于各种长期压力中,如慢性传染病、自身免疫性疾病或肿瘤疾病以及精神障碍。本文概述了目前已知的疲劳、社会心理压力和免疫反应之间的生物-心理-社会相互作用。鉴于目前的心理神经免疫学知识和生物心理社会模式,身体和心理社会的高度压力会导致神经内分泌-免疫失调。根据这一模式,疲劳症状与长期过度激活的先天免疫反应相对应。与此同时,慢性免疫激活会导致习得性免疫反应的失活,这种反应主要是(自身)抗体的产生和过度激活的 T 淋巴细胞。然而,报告疲劳的患者并不一定表现出免疫失调。目前需要开展研究和教育,以确定患者亚群,并为他们量身定制治疗方案。
{"title":"[Immunological aspects and stress regulation in fatigue].","authors":"Eva Milena Johanne Peters","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03952-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03952-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fatigue is a term that describes exhaustion as either physically measurable, usually muscular, or perceived. Fatigue as a condition is observed in a wide range of long-term stresses such as chronic infectious, autoimmune, or oncologic diseases as well as mental disorders. This article provides an overview of the currently known biopsychosocial interactions between fatigue, psychosocial stress, and immune response. It describes how chronic inflammatory processes and stress interact in fatigue and for which therapeutic approaches there is evidence to date.Given the current psychoneuroimmunological knowledge and the biopsychosocial model, both high physical and psychosocial stress can converge in neuroendocrine-immunological dysregulation. According to this model, symptoms of fatigue correspond to a chronically overactivated innate immune response. At the same time, chronic immune activation favors a misactivation of the learned immune response, which is dominated by (auto)antibody production and hyperactivated T lymphocytes. However, patients who report fatigue do not necessarily display immunological dysregulations. There is currently a need for research and education in order to identify patient subpopulations and specifically tailored treatment concepts to them.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1222-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549199/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03954-x
Yesim Erim, Franziska Geiser, Petra Beschoner, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Kerstin Weidner, Christian Albus, Andreas M Baranowski, Sabine Mogwitz, Eva Morawa
Background: Healthcare workers have an increased risk of depression and anxiety, and medical staff have faced a wide variety of challenges, especially during the COVID-19-pandemic. The aim of the VOICE study was to investigate risk and protective factors for workplace-related stress experience and mental health.
Method: A multicentre, web-based and prospective survey (VOICE study) was initiated in the spring of 2020 by a network of five psychosomatic university clinics (Erlangen, Ulm, Bonn, Cologne and Dresden). More than 25,000 respondents took part in the study at five measurement points.
Results: Of 3678 employees examined in a hospital setting during the first wave of the pandemic, 17.4% and 17.8% of physicians, 21.6% and 19.0% of nurses and 23.0% and 20.1% of medical-technical assistants (MTA) were affected by symptoms of depression and anxiety, respectively, to a clinically relevant extent. The most important risk factors for depressive and anxiety symptoms were insufficient relaxation during leisure time, increased alcohol consumption, lower trust in colleagues in difficult work situations and increased fear of becoming ill with COVID-19. Predictors for increased post-traumatic symptoms were increased generalized anxiety and depression as well as increased fear of infecting family members. Sense of coherence, social support, optimism and reward level acted as protective factors.
Discussion: The psychological effects of workplace-related stress during the pandemic were found to be significant. Therefore, regular mental health screening and prevention programmes for healthcare workers are indicated.
{"title":"[Workplace-related stress experience and mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: risk and protective factors from the VOICE study].","authors":"Yesim Erim, Franziska Geiser, Petra Beschoner, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Kerstin Weidner, Christian Albus, Andreas M Baranowski, Sabine Mogwitz, Eva Morawa","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03954-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03954-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare workers have an increased risk of depression and anxiety, and medical staff have faced a wide variety of challenges, especially during the COVID-19-pandemic. The aim of the VOICE study was to investigate risk and protective factors for workplace-related stress experience and mental health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multicentre, web-based and prospective survey (VOICE study) was initiated in the spring of 2020 by a network of five psychosomatic university clinics (Erlangen, Ulm, Bonn, Cologne and Dresden). More than 25,000 respondents took part in the study at five measurement points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3678 employees examined in a hospital setting during the first wave of the pandemic, 17.4% and 17.8% of physicians, 21.6% and 19.0% of nurses and 23.0% and 20.1% of medical-technical assistants (MTA) were affected by symptoms of depression and anxiety, respectively, to a clinically relevant extent. The most important risk factors for depressive and anxiety symptoms were insufficient relaxation during leisure time, increased alcohol consumption, lower trust in colleagues in difficult work situations and increased fear of becoming ill with COVID-19. Predictors for increased post-traumatic symptoms were increased generalized anxiety and depression as well as increased fear of infecting family members. Sense of coherence, social support, optimism and reward level acted as protective factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The psychological effects of workplace-related stress during the pandemic were found to be significant. Therefore, regular mental health screening and prevention programmes for healthcare workers are indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1248-1255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549185/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-31DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03967-6
Lars Gerland, Freerk Theeagnus Baumann
Burnout and fatigue have overlaps in their symptoms. The common denominator is exhaustion. Physical activity has been shown to be a risk-reducing factor for the development or manifestation of symptoms. There is also evidence of an effect of physical activity in the acute phase, rehabilitation, and aftercare of burnout as well as in diseases that are associated with the occurrence of fatigue and their treatments.In burnout research, physical activity is considered a risk-reducing factor and coping strategy, but there are no specific exercise recommendations with regard to symptom severity. In the area of tiredness/fatigue, the overall picture is inconsistent: there are already targeted recommendations for exercise therapy in a multimodal approach for individual clinical pictures. For example, there is high evidence for the use of appropriately dosed physical activity in cancer patients in adjuvant therapy and aftercare. Other diseases associated with the occurrence of fatigue, such as long- and post-COVID, have not yet been sufficiently researched to make clear statements about a dose-response relationship. For some diseases, there are already targeted recommendations for exercise therapy in a multimodal approach.This paper aims to provide an overview of the current state of exercise research in burnout and fatigue and thus, on the one hand, make therapy recommendations for practitioners and patients, and on the other hand, shed light on the evidence in those areas in which there are (still) no general and individualized exercise recommendations and guidelines.
{"title":"[Sport and exercise therapy for burnout and fatigue-a narrative review].","authors":"Lars Gerland, Freerk Theeagnus Baumann","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03967-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03967-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burnout and fatigue have overlaps in their symptoms. The common denominator is exhaustion. Physical activity has been shown to be a risk-reducing factor for the development or manifestation of symptoms. There is also evidence of an effect of physical activity in the acute phase, rehabilitation, and aftercare of burnout as well as in diseases that are associated with the occurrence of fatigue and their treatments.In burnout research, physical activity is considered a risk-reducing factor and coping strategy, but there are no specific exercise recommendations with regard to symptom severity. In the area of tiredness/fatigue, the overall picture is inconsistent: there are already targeted recommendations for exercise therapy in a multimodal approach for individual clinical pictures. For example, there is high evidence for the use of appropriately dosed physical activity in cancer patients in adjuvant therapy and aftercare. Other diseases associated with the occurrence of fatigue, such as long- and post-COVID, have not yet been sufficiently researched to make clear statements about a dose-response relationship. For some diseases, there are already targeted recommendations for exercise therapy in a multimodal approach.This paper aims to provide an overview of the current state of exercise research in burnout and fatigue and thus, on the one hand, make therapy recommendations for practitioners and patients, and on the other hand, shed light on the evidence in those areas in which there are (still) no general and individualized exercise recommendations and guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1288-1294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03961-y
Sarah Kern, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Petra Beschoner
Background: Although burnout is not an F‑Diagnosis in the ICD-11, many people are suffering from it. This has many economic and health-related consequences, because burnout is closely tied to an inability to work and significant secondary illnesses. This article provides an umbrella review of therapy approaches for burnout that have already been used and evaluated and shows in which areas there are promising, but still little researched, therapeutic support options for those affected.
Methods: A systematic literature search of studies was carried out in PubMed and Google Scholar between 2010 and 2024. The search terms were "burnout," "therapy," and "intervention" combined with "systematic review" and "meta-analysis." Overall, 10 systematic reviews or meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria.
Results: In five systematic reviews or meta-analyses, the therapy approaches focused on a specific professional group (nurses, doctors, and teachers); the others related to students or various groups of people. In seven studies, the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on burnout were shown. The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) were shown in four studies. Acceptance and commitment-therapy (ACT) as well as rational emotive therapy (RET) also proved to be effective.
Conclusion: It still needs to be researched whether established thinking and behavioral patterns can be changed through the therapies discussed. The professional context should be given more attention. Some resource-oriented approaches like optimism, a sense of control, self-efficacy, and self-acceptance seem promising in the treatment of burnout.
{"title":"[Psychotherapeutic burnout interventions-an umbrella review].","authors":"Sarah Kern, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Petra Beschoner","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03961-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03961-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although burnout is not an F‑Diagnosis in the ICD-11, many people are suffering from it. This has many economic and health-related consequences, because burnout is closely tied to an inability to work and significant secondary illnesses. This article provides an umbrella review of therapy approaches for burnout that have already been used and evaluated and shows in which areas there are promising, but still little researched, therapeutic support options for those affected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of studies was carried out in PubMed and Google Scholar between 2010 and 2024. The search terms were \"burnout,\" \"therapy,\" and \"intervention\" combined with \"systematic review\" and \"meta-analysis.\" Overall, 10 systematic reviews or meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In five systematic reviews or meta-analyses, the therapy approaches focused on a specific professional group (nurses, doctors, and teachers); the others related to students or various groups of people. In seven studies, the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on burnout were shown. The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) were shown in four studies. Acceptance and commitment-therapy (ACT) as well as rational emotive therapy (RET) also proved to be effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It still needs to be researched whether established thinking and behavioral patterns can be changed through the therapies discussed. The professional context should be given more attention. Some resource-oriented approaches like optimism, a sense of control, self-efficacy, and self-acceptance seem promising in the treatment of burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1279-1287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549179/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142458721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03931-4
Johannes Brettner, Constantin Wiegel, Veronika Reisig, Renate Übe, Wolfgang H Caselmann, Joseph Kuhn
Background: Loneliness represents a significant health risk and is associated with numerous mental and physical conditions. The aim of this paper was to describe the prevalence of loneliness in Bavaria before and during the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to socio-demographic attributes.
Methods: Data sources were the German Ageing Survey (DEAS) and the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Univariate statistical analyses were carried out for different socio-demographic attributes, such as age, gender, type of household, education, and financial resources.
Results: According to the SOEP, the proportion of adults who are often or very often lonely increased from 2.3% in 2017 to 16.2% in 2021. In 2021, women had a higher prevalence of loneliness than men (21.0% vs. 11.3%), and younger adults had the highest prevalence of loneliness (18 to 25 years: 31.7%) compared to the other age groups.
Discussion and conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, loneliness increased in almost every population subgroup in Bavaria. Further studies are needed to examine whether this development is temporary or represents a long-term effect even after the measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have been lifted.
{"title":"[Loneliness in Bavaria before and during the COVID-19 pandemic].","authors":"Johannes Brettner, Constantin Wiegel, Veronika Reisig, Renate Übe, Wolfgang H Caselmann, Joseph Kuhn","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03931-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03931-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness represents a significant health risk and is associated with numerous mental and physical conditions. The aim of this paper was to describe the prevalence of loneliness in Bavaria before and during the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to socio-demographic attributes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data sources were the German Ageing Survey (DEAS) and the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Univariate statistical analyses were carried out for different socio-demographic attributes, such as age, gender, type of household, education, and financial resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the SOEP, the proportion of adults who are often or very often lonely increased from 2.3% in 2017 to 16.2% in 2021. In 2021, women had a higher prevalence of loneliness than men (21.0% vs. 11.3%), and younger adults had the highest prevalence of loneliness (18 to 25 years: 31.7%) compared to the other age groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, loneliness increased in almost every population subgroup in Bavaria. Further studies are needed to examine whether this development is temporary or represents a long-term effect even after the measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have been lifted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1113-1120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141896858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-08DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03939-w
Susanne Buecker, Anne Neuber
Loneliness is increasingly recognized as a significant health risk. This review provides an overview of current research on the impact of loneliness on mental and physical health. The findings indicate that loneliness is a significant risk factor of both mental and physical health. Previous reviews focusing on mental health effects reveal that loneliness is associated with the onset of depression, social anxiety, and cognitive decline. Furthermore, loneliness can impede recovery from mental disorders in general, which can be partly attributed to the bidirectional interplay between loneliness and mental health. Regarding physical health, consequences of loneliness have been mostly studied in relation to cardiovascular diseases. Loneliness predicts the onset of cardiovascular diseases and impedes recovery from them. Reviews also highlight that loneliness enhances the likelihood of suicidality and mortality. However, this article also points out the shortage of longitudinal studies, complicating the investigation into how loneliness causally affects future health problems. The health implications of loneliness outlined in this review, some of which are irreversible and can induce suffering and impairment, underscore the importance of interventions aimed at alleviating loneliness as a preventive strategy against both mental and physical illnesses.
{"title":"[Loneliness as health risk: a narrative review].","authors":"Susanne Buecker, Anne Neuber","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03939-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03939-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness is increasingly recognized as a significant health risk. This review provides an overview of current research on the impact of loneliness on mental and physical health. The findings indicate that loneliness is a significant risk factor of both mental and physical health. Previous reviews focusing on mental health effects reveal that loneliness is associated with the onset of depression, social anxiety, and cognitive decline. Furthermore, loneliness can impede recovery from mental disorders in general, which can be partly attributed to the bidirectional interplay between loneliness and mental health. Regarding physical health, consequences of loneliness have been mostly studied in relation to cardiovascular diseases. Loneliness predicts the onset of cardiovascular diseases and impedes recovery from them. Reviews also highlight that loneliness enhances the likelihood of suicidality and mortality. However, this article also points out the shortage of longitudinal studies, complicating the investigation into how loneliness causally affects future health problems. The health implications of loneliness outlined in this review, some of which are irreversible and can induce suffering and impairment, underscore the importance of interventions aimed at alleviating loneliness as a preventive strategy against both mental and physical illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141901079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03933-2
Felix S Hussenoeder, Maria Koschig, Ines Conrad, Alexander Pabst, Katharina Gatzsche, Luise Bieler, Mathias Alberti, Katarina Stengler, Steffi G Riedel-Heller
Background: Loneliness is a widespread phenomenon, and it is associated with a variety of health problems and diseases. Unemployed individuals diagnosed with a mental illness (UMIs) are at a high risk of experiencing loneliness, with serious repercussions for their health and vocational rehabilitation. With this study we wanted to better understand the associations between sociodemographic variables, mental health, and loneliness in UMIs.
Methods: We analyzed the data of 526 unemployed individuals that received means-tested benefits as well as at least one psychiatric diagnosis. Data were collected between September 2020 and September 2023. We conducted two robust regressions with loneliness (University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale, UCLA) as an outcome (N = 526). In the first regression, we used social network as a predictor (Lubben Social Network Scale, LSNS-6); in the second regression we included the additional predictors personal debt (yes/no), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9), anxiety (Mini-Symptom-Checklist,MSCL), and somatization (MSCL) as well as age, gender, education, and living with a partner as control variables.
Results: We found a significant negative association between social network and loneliness, and a significant positive association between a high level of education, depression, anxiety, and loneliness.
Conclusions: Unemployed individuals diagnosed with a mental illness in our sample exhibited high levels of depression, anxiety, somatization, and loneliness. The associations between social network, mental health, and loneliness that we found emphasize the importance of psychological screening and/or diagnostics, and they highlight areas for prevention.
{"title":"[Loneliness in unemployed individuals diagnosed with mental illness].","authors":"Felix S Hussenoeder, Maria Koschig, Ines Conrad, Alexander Pabst, Katharina Gatzsche, Luise Bieler, Mathias Alberti, Katarina Stengler, Steffi G Riedel-Heller","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03933-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03933-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is a widespread phenomenon, and it is associated with a variety of health problems and diseases. Unemployed individuals diagnosed with a mental illness (UMIs) are at a high risk of experiencing loneliness, with serious repercussions for their health and vocational rehabilitation. With this study we wanted to better understand the associations between sociodemographic variables, mental health, and loneliness in UMIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the data of 526 unemployed individuals that received means-tested benefits as well as at least one psychiatric diagnosis. Data were collected between September 2020 and September 2023. We conducted two robust regressions with loneliness (University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale, UCLA) as an outcome (N = 526). In the first regression, we used social network as a predictor (Lubben Social Network Scale, LSNS-6); in the second regression we included the additional predictors personal debt (yes/no), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9), anxiety (Mini-Symptom-Checklist,MSCL), and somatization (MSCL) as well as age, gender, education, and living with a partner as control variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant negative association between social network and loneliness, and a significant positive association between a high level of education, depression, anxiety, and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unemployed individuals diagnosed with a mental illness in our sample exhibited high levels of depression, anxiety, somatization, and loneliness. The associations between social network, mental health, and loneliness that we found emphasize the importance of psychological screening and/or diagnostics, and they highlight areas for prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"1131-1136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141901080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03944-z
{"title":"Empfehlung zum Schutz von Badenden vor Cyanobakterien und Cyanobakterientoxinen.","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03944-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03944-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":"67 10","pages":"1192-1204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03947-w
Joseph Kuhn, Martin Härter, Peter Brieger, Steffi G Riedel-Heller
{"title":"[Loneliness: a term for many realities].","authors":"Joseph Kuhn, Martin Härter, Peter Brieger, Steffi G Riedel-Heller","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03947-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00103-024-03947-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":"67 10","pages":"1093-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424724/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}