Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04325-y
Ludger Feyen, Marcus Katoh, Patrick Haage, Peter Schramm, Stefan Rohde, Nico Münnich, Helge C Kniep
Purpose: We investigated whether bridging therapy (BL) was more effective as compared to thrombectomy alone (DT) in the posterior circulation and M2 occlusions as compared to M1 occlusions in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Material and methods: This study is based on data from 4853 patients that were enrolled in the nationwide registry of the German Society for Neuroradiology between 2018 and 2022. Outcome measures included the relative proportion of patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-8 at discharge, successful reperfusion defined as a modified treatment in cerebral infarction score of 2b, 2c, or 3, the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage, embolism in another vascular territory and mortality.
Results: There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) between the groups with DT and BL in periprocedural complications, mortality and functional outcome for patients with occlusion of the M1 and M2 segment. Significant higher recanalization rates were found for the M1 segment (BL 89.3%, DT 84.9%, p = 0.009) in patients treated with BL; no significant differences were found between the groups for the M2 segment. In patients with basilar occlusion, we found a significantly higher embolization rate in patients with BL (BL 2.7%, DT 1%, p = 0.018) and all other outcome measures did not differ significantly.
Conclusion: Our analysis does not show significant differences in mortality, hemorrhage and functional outcome rates between BL and DT for patients with M1, M2 and basilar occlusions. BL was not associated with different recanalization rates in patients with M2 and basilar occlusions.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Bridging Lysis Compared to Direct Thrombectomy at Different Occlusion Sites in Acute Ischemic Stroke of the Anterior and Posterior Circulation.","authors":"Ludger Feyen, Marcus Katoh, Patrick Haage, Peter Schramm, Stefan Rohde, Nico Münnich, Helge C Kniep","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04325-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04325-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated whether bridging therapy (BL) was more effective as compared to thrombectomy alone (DT) in the posterior circulation and M2 occlusions as compared to M1 occlusions in patients with acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study is based on data from 4853 patients that were enrolled in the nationwide registry of the German Society for Neuroradiology between 2018 and 2022. Outcome measures included the relative proportion of patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-8 at discharge, successful reperfusion defined as a modified treatment in cerebral infarction score of 2b, 2c, or 3, the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage, embolism in another vascular territory and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) between the groups with DT and BL in periprocedural complications, mortality and functional outcome for patients with occlusion of the M1 and M2 segment. Significant higher recanalization rates were found for the M1 segment (BL 89.3%, DT 84.9%, p = 0.009) in patients treated with BL; no significant differences were found between the groups for the M2 segment. In patients with basilar occlusion, we found a significantly higher embolization rate in patients with BL (BL 2.7%, DT 1%, p = 0.018) and all other outcome measures did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis does not show significant differences in mortality, hemorrhage and functional outcome rates between BL and DT for patients with M1, M2 and basilar occlusions. BL was not associated with different recanalization rates in patients with M2 and basilar occlusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145958847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04318-x
Nishanth Konduru, Anton Hnatov, Samuel Pravin Joshua, Merna Metry, Hardayal Singh, Siddhartha Rao
Purpose: This study examines the efficacy of genicular artery embolization (GAE) as a treatment to reduce chronic knee pain in patients who have previously undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Materials and methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients (13 men and 24 women) with a history of persistent pain for at least one year after TKA underwent GAE at a single center. The mean age across all patients was 72.8 ± 9.7 years, and the mean BMI was 29.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2. Imipenem cilastatin particles and/or microspheres were delivered through a microcatheter to the targeted arteries by a board-certified interventional cardiologist. Clinical success was determined by degree of improvement in patient response to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain questionnaires at one-month and three-month intervals following successful embolization of targeted arteries.
Results: Among 37 patients, WOMAC scores at the preliminary, one-month, and three-month follow-up appointments were 64% ± 6%, 39% ± 8%, and 36% ± 8%, respectively (95% CI). VAS scores were 8.1 ± 0.6, 3.2 ± 1.1, and 3.1 ± 1.0 (95% CI). A paired t-test showed a statistically significant improvement at both one-month and three-month post-procedure evaluations. (p < 0.05). Overall, 64.9% (n = 24) of patients achieved at least a 50% improvement in pain scores by the end of the study term.
Conclusion: GAE shows efficacy as an adjunct treatment in patients with TKA and long-standing pain (> 1 year). Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and broader applicability.
{"title":"Genicular Artery Embolization as a Treatment Option for Refractory Knee Pain Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Series.","authors":"Nishanth Konduru, Anton Hnatov, Samuel Pravin Joshua, Merna Metry, Hardayal Singh, Siddhartha Rao","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04318-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04318-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the efficacy of genicular artery embolization (GAE) as a treatment to reduce chronic knee pain in patients who have previously undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-seven consecutive patients (13 men and 24 women) with a history of persistent pain for at least one year after TKA underwent GAE at a single center. The mean age across all patients was 72.8 ± 9.7 years, and the mean BMI was 29.3 ± 6.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Imipenem cilastatin particles and/or microspheres were delivered through a microcatheter to the targeted arteries by a board-certified interventional cardiologist. Clinical success was determined by degree of improvement in patient response to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain questionnaires at one-month and three-month intervals following successful embolization of targeted arteries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 37 patients, WOMAC scores at the preliminary, one-month, and three-month follow-up appointments were 64% ± 6%, 39% ± 8%, and 36% ± 8%, respectively (95% CI). VAS scores were 8.1 ± 0.6, 3.2 ± 1.1, and 3.1 ± 1.0 (95% CI). A paired t-test showed a statistically significant improvement at both one-month and three-month post-procedure evaluations. (p < 0.05). Overall, 64.9% (n = 24) of patients achieved at least a 50% improvement in pain scores by the end of the study term.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GAE shows efficacy as an adjunct treatment in patients with TKA and long-standing pain (> 1 year). Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and broader applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145932222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04328-9
Anthony G Ryan, Iain Irvine, Harry Bardgett, Rutger van der Meer, David Rea, Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Background: Obstructive uropathy is a very common pathology of the genitourinary system which, if untreated, leads to renal impairment, end-stage renal failure and death. Particularly in the case of acute obstructive uropathy, urgent decompression is necessary to prevent compression-mediated ischaemia of the renal parenchyma and the development of irreversible renal failure. Percutaneous nephrostomy is a well-established and relatively safe image-guided procedure used to obtain access to the renal collecting system and is the procedure of choice for the infected obstructed kidney, minimising the risk of septic shock and possible death. Subsequent internalisation via antegrade ureteric stenting is frequently employed to relieve obstruction at the level of the causative lesion.
Purpose: CIRSE Standards of Practice documents recommend a reasonable approach to, and best practices for, performing procedures, in this instance, Nephrostomy and Ureteric Stent Placement and Exchange.
Methods: The writing group, established by the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee, consisted of five clinicians with internationally recognised expertise in this topic, and one research assistant (I.I.). The writing group reviewed the existing literature, performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to search for publications in English relating to human subjects from 2001 to 2025. Relevant older primary sources were included where the data have not been updated.
Results: A document was produced, making recommendations for practice based on currently available evidence in a range of clinical scenarios.
{"title":"CIRSE Standards of Practice on Nephrostomy and Ureteric Stent Placement and Exchange.","authors":"Anthony G Ryan, Iain Irvine, Harry Bardgett, Rutger van der Meer, David Rea, Gianpaolo Carrafiello","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04328-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04328-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive uropathy is a very common pathology of the genitourinary system which, if untreated, leads to renal impairment, end-stage renal failure and death. Particularly in the case of acute obstructive uropathy, urgent decompression is necessary to prevent compression-mediated ischaemia of the renal parenchyma and the development of irreversible renal failure. Percutaneous nephrostomy is a well-established and relatively safe image-guided procedure used to obtain access to the renal collecting system and is the procedure of choice for the infected obstructed kidney, minimising the risk of septic shock and possible death. Subsequent internalisation via antegrade ureteric stenting is frequently employed to relieve obstruction at the level of the causative lesion.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>CIRSE Standards of Practice documents recommend a reasonable approach to, and best practices for, performing procedures, in this instance, Nephrostomy and Ureteric Stent Placement and Exchange.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The writing group, established by the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee, consisted of five clinicians with internationally recognised expertise in this topic, and one research assistant (I.I.). The writing group reviewed the existing literature, performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to search for publications in English relating to human subjects from 2001 to 2025. Relevant older primary sources were included where the data have not been updated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A document was produced, making recommendations for practice based on currently available evidence in a range of clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145932174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04302-5
G C M van Erp, C A M Verhagen, T J Koolstra, J J van Duijn-de Vreugd, P Hendriks, M E Tushuizen, C S P van Rijswijk, A R van Erkel, R W van der Meer, M J Coenraad, J Dijkstra, M C Burgmans
Purpose: This study aims to compare local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in patients with de novo HCC treated with thermal ablation (TA) using real-time CT/MRI-US fusion imaging (FI) or ultrasound (US) for needle placement.
Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with de novo HCC who underwent percutaneous TA between January 2013 and December 2021. US was the preferred image guidance modality for ultrasonographically conspicuous lesions; however, for inconspicuous lesions, FI (US-CT or US-MRI) was used for needle placement. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was applied to balance baseline variables between the US- and FI-guided groups. LRFS, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared before and after matching using the log-rank test. Univariate analyses using Cox regression were used to identify prognostic factors for LRFS.
Results: A total of 117 patients with 157 lesions were ablated using US and FI needle guidance in 100 and 57 tumors, respectively. PSM yielded 40 tumors in both groups. The 1-year LRFS rates were similar across the groups before and after matching (US: 0.82, FI: 0.94 (p = 0.07) and US: 0.87, FI: 0.91 (p = 0.20), respectively). Univariate analysis revealed that only tumor size was a predictive factor for LRFS. Before and after matching, the DFS and OS did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: FI-guided needle placement facilitates effective targeting of HCC lesions that are ultrasonographically inconspicuous, yielding LRFS outcomes comparable to those achieved with US guidance for ultrasonographically conspicuous lesions. Level of Evidence 3b, Retrospective Cohort Study.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Real-Time CT/MRI-US Fusion Imaging in Thermal Ablation of Ultrasonographically Inconspicuous Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"G C M van Erp, C A M Verhagen, T J Koolstra, J J van Duijn-de Vreugd, P Hendriks, M E Tushuizen, C S P van Rijswijk, A R van Erkel, R W van der Meer, M J Coenraad, J Dijkstra, M C Burgmans","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04302-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04302-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in patients with de novo HCC treated with thermal ablation (TA) using real-time CT/MRI-US fusion imaging (FI) or ultrasound (US) for needle placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with de novo HCC who underwent percutaneous TA between January 2013 and December 2021. US was the preferred image guidance modality for ultrasonographically conspicuous lesions; however, for inconspicuous lesions, FI (US-CT or US-MRI) was used for needle placement. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was applied to balance baseline variables between the US- and FI-guided groups. LRFS, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared before and after matching using the log-rank test. Univariate analyses using Cox regression were used to identify prognostic factors for LRFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients with 157 lesions were ablated using US and FI needle guidance in 100 and 57 tumors, respectively. PSM yielded 40 tumors in both groups. The 1-year LRFS rates were similar across the groups before and after matching (US: 0.82, FI: 0.94 (p = 0.07) and US: 0.87, FI: 0.91 (p = 0.20), respectively). Univariate analysis revealed that only tumor size was a predictive factor for LRFS. Before and after matching, the DFS and OS did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FI-guided needle placement facilitates effective targeting of HCC lesions that are ultrasonographically inconspicuous, yielding LRFS outcomes comparable to those achieved with US guidance for ultrasonographically conspicuous lesions. Level of Evidence 3b, Retrospective Cohort Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145932193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04293-3
Hinrich Winther, Sabine Maschke, Lena Becker, Cornelia Dewald, Marcel Eicke, Tobias Jakobs, Roman Kloeckner, Axel Schmid, Frank Wacker, Bernhard Meyer
Purpose: To evaluate a fully automated bone removal software for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, enhancing vascular visualization by eliminating bone interference and improving diagnostic quality.
Material and methods: 1035 CBCT scans from adults age 66.5 ± 11.9 18-87 years (mean ± std min-max) across nine centers were retrospectively analyzed, divided into training (n = 855, 515 abdomen, 229 pelvis, 111 thorax) and testing (n = 180, 60 for each region, 114 male, 53 female, 13 unknown). Manual bone segmentation was performed using ITK-SNAP. A modified 3D U-Net was trained and clinically evaluated through multireader analysis using ordinal scales from 1 (perfect) to 4 (not usable) bone subtraction (B-rating) and erosion of non-target structures (V-rating) in addition to a vessel assessment (VA-rating), categorizing the subtracted image as "better" (1), "same" (2), or "worse" (3). Quantitative metrics include Sørensen-Dice coefficient and intersection over union (IoU).
Results: The software demonstrated high accuracy with a B-rating of 1.01 ± 0.07 and a V-rating of 1.02 ± 0.13, indicating minimal erosion of non-target structures. A VA-rating of 1.0 ± 0 suggests an improved vessel assessment and the depiction of contrast material deposition, enhancing the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. Quantitative analysis closely matched the manual expert delineation (Sørensen-Dice coefficient 0.95 ± 0.02, IoU of 0.9 ± 0.03).
Conclusion: The software provides robust, fully automated bone removal in CBCT scans. This technology may enhance vascular system visualization without compromising non-target structures, potentially improving the accuracy and efficiency of interventional and diagnostic radiology procedures.
目的:评价一种用于胸部、腹部和骨盆锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的全自动去骨软件,通过消除骨干扰和提高诊断质量来增强血管的可视化。材料和方法:回顾性分析来自9个中心的1035位年龄在66.5±11.9岁(平均±std最小-最大)18-87岁的成年人的CBCT扫描,分为训练组(n = 855,腹部515,骨盆229,胸部111)和测试组(n = 180,60,每个区域,114名男性,53名女性,13名未知)。使用ITK-SNAP进行人工骨分割。改进的3D U-Net进行训练,并通过多读器分析进行临床评估,使用从1(完美)到4(不可用)的顺序量表(b级)和非目标结构侵蚀(v级)以及血管评估(va级),将减去的图像分类为“更好”(1),“相同”(2)或“更差”(3)。定量指标包括Sørensen-Dice系数和intersection over union (IoU)。结果:该软件具有较高的准确度,b级为1.01±0.07,v级为1.02±0.13,表明非目标结构的侵蚀最小。va评分为1.0±0,表明血管评估和造影剂沉积的描述得到改善,提高了CBCT图像的诊断质量。定量分析结果与人工专家的描述非常吻合(Sørensen-Dice系数0.95±0.02,IoU为0.9±0.03)。结论:该软件在CBCT扫描中提供了强大的、全自动的骨去除。这项技术可以在不影响非目标结构的情况下增强血管系统的可视化,潜在地提高介入和诊断放射学程序的准确性和效率。
{"title":"Automatic Bone Removal in CBCT Scans of the Body Trunk: Thorax, Abdomen, and Pelvis.","authors":"Hinrich Winther, Sabine Maschke, Lena Becker, Cornelia Dewald, Marcel Eicke, Tobias Jakobs, Roman Kloeckner, Axel Schmid, Frank Wacker, Bernhard Meyer","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04293-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04293-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate a fully automated bone removal software for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, enhancing vascular visualization by eliminating bone interference and improving diagnostic quality.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>1035 CBCT scans from adults age 66.5 ± 11.9 18-87 years (mean ± std min-max) across nine centers were retrospectively analyzed, divided into training (n = 855, 515 abdomen, 229 pelvis, 111 thorax) and testing (n = 180, 60 for each region, 114 male, 53 female, 13 unknown). Manual bone segmentation was performed using ITK-SNAP. A modified 3D U-Net was trained and clinically evaluated through multireader analysis using ordinal scales from 1 (perfect) to 4 (not usable) bone subtraction (B-rating) and erosion of non-target structures (V-rating) in addition to a vessel assessment (VA-rating), categorizing the subtracted image as \"better\" (1), \"same\" (2), or \"worse\" (3). Quantitative metrics include Sørensen-Dice coefficient and intersection over union (IoU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The software demonstrated high accuracy with a B-rating of 1.01 ± 0.07 and a V-rating of 1.02 ± 0.13, indicating minimal erosion of non-target structures. A VA-rating of 1.0 ± 0 suggests an improved vessel assessment and the depiction of contrast material deposition, enhancing the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. Quantitative analysis closely matched the manual expert delineation (Sørensen-Dice coefficient 0.95 ± 0.02, IoU of 0.9 ± 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The software provides robust, fully automated bone removal in CBCT scans. This technology may enhance vascular system visualization without compromising non-target structures, potentially improving the accuracy and efficiency of interventional and diagnostic radiology procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04312-3
Juan J Ciampi-Dopazo, José A Guirola, John Moriarty, Raman Uberoi, Dimitrios Tsetis, Corrado Ini', Antonio Basile
Purpose: This CIRSE Standards of Practice document aims to provide comprehensive standards for the endovascular treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and includes recommendations for the imaging diagnosis, surveillance, intervention indications and endovascular treatments.
Methods: The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group of six internationally recognised interventional radiologists with expertise in pulmonary embolism interventions and one research assistant (C.I). The group conducted a pragmatic evidence-based PubMed search for relevant English-language reports on human subjects up to early 2025. The final recommendations are consensus-based.
Results: Endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism is highly successful with low complication rates. For acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease, catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are options for patients with intermediate-high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism, especially when systemic fibrinolysis fails or is contraindicated.
Conclusions: Endovascular therapy for acute pulmonary embolism is both safe and effective. This best practice document emphasises early diagnosis, appropriate patient selection and timely intervention.
{"title":"CIRSE Standards of Practice on Endovascular Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.","authors":"Juan J Ciampi-Dopazo, José A Guirola, John Moriarty, Raman Uberoi, Dimitrios Tsetis, Corrado Ini', Antonio Basile","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04312-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04312-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This CIRSE Standards of Practice document aims to provide comprehensive standards for the endovascular treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and includes recommendations for the imaging diagnosis, surveillance, intervention indications and endovascular treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group of six internationally recognised interventional radiologists with expertise in pulmonary embolism interventions and one research assistant (C.I). The group conducted a pragmatic evidence-based PubMed search for relevant English-language reports on human subjects up to early 2025. The final recommendations are consensus-based.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism is highly successful with low complication rates. For acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease, catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are options for patients with intermediate-high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism, especially when systemic fibrinolysis fails or is contraindicated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endovascular therapy for acute pulmonary embolism is both safe and effective. This best practice document emphasises early diagnosis, appropriate patient selection and timely intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145905761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04193-6
Manuel Gargiulo, Cécile Di-Rocco, Julien Panneau, Johanna Nguyen, Thierry Marx, Raphaël Haumont, Pauline Brige, Benjamin Guillet, Farouk Tradi, Vincent Vidal
{"title":"Additional In Vivo Study of Arterial Embolization with a Novel Agar-Based Embolic Agent: Feasibility and Efficacy of New-Size Implants for Improved Microcatheter Injectability.","authors":"Manuel Gargiulo, Cécile Di-Rocco, Julien Panneau, Johanna Nguyen, Thierry Marx, Raphaël Haumont, Pauline Brige, Benjamin Guillet, Farouk Tradi, Vincent Vidal","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04193-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00270-025-04193-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"147-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145028911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04167-8
Niek Wijnen, Emma Ruijs, Rutger C G Bruijnen, Joep de Bruijne, Jeroen Hagendoorn, Guus M Bol, Martijn P W Intven, Maarten L J Smits
Purpose: A tumor diameter > 3 cm is considered a relative contraindication for thermal ablation due to a significant risk of post-ablation recurrence. However, current advanced ablation techniques might allow for successful ablation of larger tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of tumor size on outcomes of Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation (HepACAGA).
Methods: Patients treated with HepACAGA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between January 2021 and June 2025 were analyzed. All ablations were performed with microwave ablation. Patients were stratified by tumor size: ≤ 2 cm, 2-3 cm, and 3-5 cm. Outcomes assessed included local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), local tumor progression (LTP) rate, and complications.
Results: A total of 137 consecutive patients with 265 tumors (152 HCC and 113 CRLM) were included: 187 tumors ≤ 2 cm, 52 tumors 2-3 cm, and 26 tumors 3-5 cm. The 1-year LTPFS was most favorable for tumors ≤ 2 cm (96%; 95% CI: 93-99), followed by 2-3 cm (93%; 95% CI: 85-100), and 3-5 cm (90%; 95% CI: 78-100). No significant differences in LTPFS were found (p = 0.580). Overall, LTP occurred in 5% of tumors. Secondary LTP rates were 3% for tumors ≤ 2 cm and 4% for both tumors 2-3 cm and 3-5 cm (p = 0.966). Complication rates were 4% for tumors ≤ 2 cm, 6% for tumors 2-3 cm, and 13% for tumors 3-5 cm (p = 0.236).
Conclusion: HepACAGA proved to be effective and safe for treating patients with HCC and CRLM across a broad range of tumor sizes. These findings suggest that intermediate-sized tumors (3-5 cm) could be eligible for thermal ablation without compromising post-ablation recurrence.
{"title":"Impact of Tumor Size on Outcomes of Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation (HepACAGA): > 3 cm Is No Absolute Contraindication.","authors":"Niek Wijnen, Emma Ruijs, Rutger C G Bruijnen, Joep de Bruijne, Jeroen Hagendoorn, Guus M Bol, Martijn P W Intven, Maarten L J Smits","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04167-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00270-025-04167-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A tumor diameter > 3 cm is considered a relative contraindication for thermal ablation due to a significant risk of post-ablation recurrence. However, current advanced ablation techniques might allow for successful ablation of larger tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of tumor size on outcomes of Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation (HepACAGA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated with HepACAGA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between January 2021 and June 2025 were analyzed. All ablations were performed with microwave ablation. Patients were stratified by tumor size: ≤ 2 cm, 2-3 cm, and 3-5 cm. Outcomes assessed included local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), local tumor progression (LTP) rate, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 137 consecutive patients with 265 tumors (152 HCC and 113 CRLM) were included: 187 tumors ≤ 2 cm, 52 tumors 2-3 cm, and 26 tumors 3-5 cm. The 1-year LTPFS was most favorable for tumors ≤ 2 cm (96%; 95% CI: 93-99), followed by 2-3 cm (93%; 95% CI: 85-100), and 3-5 cm (90%; 95% CI: 78-100). No significant differences in LTPFS were found (p = 0.580). Overall, LTP occurred in 5% of tumors. Secondary LTP rates were 3% for tumors ≤ 2 cm and 4% for both tumors 2-3 cm and 3-5 cm (p = 0.966). Complication rates were 4% for tumors ≤ 2 cm, 6% for tumors 2-3 cm, and 13% for tumors 3-5 cm (p = 0.236).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HepACAGA proved to be effective and safe for treating patients with HCC and CRLM across a broad range of tumor sizes. These findings suggest that intermediate-sized tumors (3-5 cm) could be eligible for thermal ablation without compromising post-ablation recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"59-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748118/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144943824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04289-z
Dong Jae Shim, Eung Tae Kim, Jae Hwan Lee, Yohan Kwon, Soo Buem Cho, Chang Jin Yoon, Seungjae Lee, John Fritz Angle, Hyungoo Shin
Purpose: We aimed to determine whether central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates differ between tunneled and conventionally inserted PICCs (tPICCs and cPICCs).
Materials and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024616470) and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched from inception to November 27, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CLABSI rates between tPICCs and cPICCs. Risk ratios along with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcomes using a random-effects meta-analysis model following the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Results: A meta-analysis of four relevant studies, comprising 2,659 participants (pooled mean age ± standard deviation, 59.3 ± 15.5 years; 1,481 women) and 177,879 catheter days, revealed overall CLABSI rates of 0.31 per 1,000 catheter-days in the tPICC group and 0.68 per 1,000 catheter-days in the cPICC group. The risk ratio (0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.81; p = 0.02) indicated a 52% reduction in the tPICC group compared with the cPICC group, with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).
Conclusion: Subcutaneous tunneling for PICC placement is associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI rate among hospitalized adult patients.
{"title":"Tunneled Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dong Jae Shim, Eung Tae Kim, Jae Hwan Lee, Yohan Kwon, Soo Buem Cho, Chang Jin Yoon, Seungjae Lee, John Fritz Angle, Hyungoo Shin","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04289-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00270-025-04289-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to determine whether central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates differ between tunneled and conventionally inserted PICCs (tPICCs and cPICCs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024616470) and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched from inception to November 27, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CLABSI rates between tPICCs and cPICCs. Risk ratios along with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcomes using a random-effects meta-analysis model following the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A meta-analysis of four relevant studies, comprising 2,659 participants (pooled mean age ± standard deviation, 59.3 ± 15.5 years; 1,481 women) and 177,879 catheter days, revealed overall CLABSI rates of 0.31 per 1,000 catheter-days in the tPICC group and 0.68 per 1,000 catheter-days in the cPICC group. The risk ratio (0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.81; p = 0.02) indicated a 52% reduction in the tPICC group compared with the cPICC group, with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subcutaneous tunneling for PICC placement is associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI rate among hospitalized adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To evaluate the association between hemodynamic depression (HD) during CAS and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Methods: We systematically searched four major databases for studies reporting the HD and MACE during CAS. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using a modified version of Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The heterogeneity between the studies was evaluated based on the I2 statistic and Dixon's Q-test. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. A fixed-effect model was used if I2 < 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was applied. Results were reported as ORs with 95% CIs. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to evaluate the publication bias.
Results: Fourteen studies comprising 4418 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Evidence of low certainty indicated that the occurrence of HD was significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.4-3.22, I2 = 0), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.51-4.88, I2 = 41.2), and all-cause mortality (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.22-6.44, I2 = 0). However, very low-certainty evidence suggested no significant association between HD and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.61-3.61, I2 = 0).
Conclusions: HD during CAS is significantly associated with a risk of TIA, stroke, and all-cause mortality, but not with the risk of MI.
目的:评价CAS患者血流动力学抑制(HD)与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的关系。方法:我们系统地检索了4个主要数据库中报道CAS期间HD和MACE的研究。纳入研究的偏倚风险采用改良版的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。根据I2统计量和Dixon’s q检验评估研究间的异质性。我们使用I2统计量评估异质性。结果:荟萃分析纳入了14项研究,共4418例患者。低确定性证据表明,HD的发生与卒中(OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.4-3.22, I2 = 0)、短暂性脑缺血发作(OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.51-4.88, I2 = 41.2)和全因死亡率(OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.22-6.44, I2 = 0)的风险增加显著相关。然而,极低确定性的证据表明HD和心肌梗死(MI)之间没有显著关联(OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.61-3.61, I2 = 0)。结论:CAS期间的HD与TIA、卒中和全因死亡率的风险显著相关,但与心肌梗死的风险无关。
{"title":"Impact of Periprocedural Hemodynamic Depression on Outcomes After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xin Liu, Xiaowei Liu, Yunsen Zhang, Yi Zheng, Keyu Chen, Zhao Zhang, Yubin Tang, Xuejun Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04291-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00270-025-04291-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the association between hemodynamic depression (HD) during CAS and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched four major databases for studies reporting the HD and MACE during CAS. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using a modified version of Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The heterogeneity between the studies was evaluated based on the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and Dixon's Q-test. We assessed heterogeneity using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. A fixed-effect model was used if I<sup>2</sup> < 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was applied. Results were reported as ORs with 95% CIs. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to evaluate the publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies comprising 4418 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Evidence of low certainty indicated that the occurrence of HD was significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.4-3.22, I<sup>2</sup> = 0), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.51-4.88, I<sup>2</sup> = 41.2), and all-cause mortality (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.22-6.44, I<sup>2</sup> = 0). However, very low-certainty evidence suggested no significant association between HD and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.61-3.61, I<sup>2</sup> = 0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HD during CAS is significantly associated with a risk of TIA, stroke, and all-cause mortality, but not with the risk of MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145741260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}