Pub Date : 2020-08-24DOI: 10.1177/2515816320951820
Nina Riggins, Ricky Chae, M. Levin, Annika Ehrlich, Henna Sawhney, Colleen Polite, P. Goadsby
The objectives of the study are to investigate the incidence of new or worsening headache after cochlear implant (CI) surgery and activation and to determine whether there are predictors of associated headache. We performed a cross-sectional survey of patients who had CI surgery. The frequency and severity of headache, onset of headache relative to surgery and device activation, medication use, family history, headache triggers, and accompanying cranial autonomic symptoms were recorded and analyzed. Thirty-seven subjects were enrolled. In the time period after CI surgery but before CI activation, none reported a new headache and four (11%) reported a worsening headache. After CI activation, six (16%) developed new headache and five (14%) developed worsening headache. These 11 subjects also experienced a significantly higher mean of 6.3 headache days/month following CI activation (p < 0.009). Providers should be aware that new or worsening headache can be reported following CI activation, although not immediately following CI surgery.
{"title":"Development of new or worsening headache after cochlear implant activation: A hypothesis-generating pilot study of incidence, timing, and clinical factors","authors":"Nina Riggins, Ricky Chae, M. Levin, Annika Ehrlich, Henna Sawhney, Colleen Polite, P. Goadsby","doi":"10.1177/2515816320951820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320951820","url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of the study are to investigate the incidence of new or worsening headache after cochlear implant (CI) surgery and activation and to determine whether there are predictors of associated headache. We performed a cross-sectional survey of patients who had CI surgery. The frequency and severity of headache, onset of headache relative to surgery and device activation, medication use, family history, headache triggers, and accompanying cranial autonomic symptoms were recorded and analyzed. Thirty-seven subjects were enrolled. In the time period after CI surgery but before CI activation, none reported a new headache and four (11%) reported a worsening headache. After CI activation, six (16%) developed new headache and five (14%) developed worsening headache. These 11 subjects also experienced a significantly higher mean of 6.3 headache days/month following CI activation (p < 0.009). Providers should be aware that new or worsening headache can be reported following CI activation, although not immediately following CI surgery.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320951820","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48036214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-12DOI: 10.1177/2515816320944928
S. Termini, C. Wöber, W. Brannath
Background: Treating migraine attacks early may improve outcome. The aim of this analysis was to investigate whether certain premonitory symptoms could be indicators for taking acute medication. Methods: We analyzed 3-month diary data recorded by 271 patients with episodic migraine and looked at all migraine-free intervals. For investigating the interaction between acute medication and neck discomfort associated with sensitivity to lights, noises, or odors, we used a marginal structural model and a Cox regression analysis adjusted for moderate or severe headache. Results: The patients (mean age 43 ± 15.4 years, 88% women) recorded a total of 20,219 diary days without migraine. In the marginal structural model analysis, the risk for occurrence of a migraine attack on the subsequent day was reduced when acute medication was used in the presence of neck discomfort associated with sensitivity to lights (hazard ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval 0.2–0.7), noises (0.4; 0.3–0.7), or odors (0.2; 0.1–0.4). The marginal structural model showed lower risk of migraine attacks than the Cox regression analysis adjusted for moderate or severe headache in the majority of the cases. Conclusion: Migraine attacks may be prevented when acute medication is used in the presence of neck discomfort associated with sensitivity to lights, noises, or odors. The results of this study may stimulate further prospective trials.
{"title":"Early use of acute medication for preventing migraine attacks: Results from a diary-based cohort study","authors":"S. Termini, C. Wöber, W. Brannath","doi":"10.1177/2515816320944928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320944928","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Treating migraine attacks early may improve outcome. The aim of this analysis was to investigate whether certain premonitory symptoms could be indicators for taking acute medication. Methods: We analyzed 3-month diary data recorded by 271 patients with episodic migraine and looked at all migraine-free intervals. For investigating the interaction between acute medication and neck discomfort associated with sensitivity to lights, noises, or odors, we used a marginal structural model and a Cox regression analysis adjusted for moderate or severe headache. Results: The patients (mean age 43 ± 15.4 years, 88% women) recorded a total of 20,219 diary days without migraine. In the marginal structural model analysis, the risk for occurrence of a migraine attack on the subsequent day was reduced when acute medication was used in the presence of neck discomfort associated with sensitivity to lights (hazard ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval 0.2–0.7), noises (0.4; 0.3–0.7), or odors (0.2; 0.1–0.4). The marginal structural model showed lower risk of migraine attacks than the Cox regression analysis adjusted for moderate or severe headache in the majority of the cases. Conclusion: Migraine attacks may be prevented when acute medication is used in the presence of neck discomfort associated with sensitivity to lights, noises, or odors. The results of this study may stimulate further prospective trials.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320944928","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42522393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-29DOI: 10.1177/2515816320939571
T. Rozen
Is it possible that some mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations enhance the risk of developing a headache disorder while other mutations actually confer a protective effect? Mitochondrial disorders have been linked to migraine but very rarely to cluster headache (CH). The true pathogenesis of CH is unknown but a linkage to cigarette smoking is irrefutable. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy is a syndrome of bilateral vision loss that typically manifests in a patient’s 20s and 30s, is male predominant, and its sufferers are heavy smokers and heavy drinkers. Tobacco exposure is so linked to the condition that only smokers appear to develop vision loss while nonsmokers remain unaffected carriers of their mutations. In essence, the Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy population is the CH population but at present there have been no reported cases of CH in this mitochondrial subgroup. Thus, could the effects of the mtDNA mutations found in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, which involve complex I of the electron transport chain, actually confer a protective effect against the development of CH? This article will delve into this theory.
{"title":"Can the effects of the mitochondrial DNA mutations found in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy be protective against the development of cluster headache in smokers?","authors":"T. Rozen","doi":"10.1177/2515816320939571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320939571","url":null,"abstract":"Is it possible that some mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations enhance the risk of developing a headache disorder while other mutations actually confer a protective effect? Mitochondrial disorders have been linked to migraine but very rarely to cluster headache (CH). The true pathogenesis of CH is unknown but a linkage to cigarette smoking is irrefutable. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy is a syndrome of bilateral vision loss that typically manifests in a patient’s 20s and 30s, is male predominant, and its sufferers are heavy smokers and heavy drinkers. Tobacco exposure is so linked to the condition that only smokers appear to develop vision loss while nonsmokers remain unaffected carriers of their mutations. In essence, the Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy population is the CH population but at present there have been no reported cases of CH in this mitochondrial subgroup. Thus, could the effects of the mtDNA mutations found in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, which involve complex I of the electron transport chain, actually confer a protective effect against the development of CH? This article will delve into this theory.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320939571","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44000865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-02DOI: 10.1177/2515816320932573
F. Sakai, Akichika Ozeki, V. Skljarevski
Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in comparison with placebo for the prevention of migraine in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which was conducted over 6 months, randomized adult patients received subcutaneous injections of galcanezumab (120 mg n = 115, 240 mg n = 114) or placebo (n = 230) once monthly. The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days. The key secondary outcome measures were response rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%); the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive score; monthly migraine headache days requiring acute treatment; and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Results: The mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days over months 1–6 was significantly (p < 0.001) greater for the 120-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.60 days) and the 240-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.36 days) compared with placebo (−0.59 days). Both the 120-mg and 240-mg doses of galcanezumab were superior compared with placebo for each of the key secondary endpoints except for PGI-S (only the 240-mg dose was superior). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were local injection-site reactions; erythema, swelling, pruritus, and pain were more commonly reported by patients who were treated with galcanezumab than those treated with placebo. Conclusion: The number of monthly migraine headache days was reduced with both doses of galcanezumab, and both doses were safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with episodic migraine.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: A phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"F. Sakai, Akichika Ozeki, V. Skljarevski","doi":"10.1177/2515816320932573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320932573","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in comparison with placebo for the prevention of migraine in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which was conducted over 6 months, randomized adult patients received subcutaneous injections of galcanezumab (120 mg n = 115, 240 mg n = 114) or placebo (n = 230) once monthly. The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days. The key secondary outcome measures were response rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%); the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive score; monthly migraine headache days requiring acute treatment; and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Results: The mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days over months 1–6 was significantly (p < 0.001) greater for the 120-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.60 days) and the 240-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.36 days) compared with placebo (−0.59 days). Both the 120-mg and 240-mg doses of galcanezumab were superior compared with placebo for each of the key secondary endpoints except for PGI-S (only the 240-mg dose was superior). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were local injection-site reactions; erythema, swelling, pruritus, and pain were more commonly reported by patients who were treated with galcanezumab than those treated with placebo. Conclusion: The number of monthly migraine headache days was reduced with both doses of galcanezumab, and both doses were safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with episodic migraine.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320932573","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43704470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-10DOI: 10.1177/2515816320930681
K. Luedtke, W. Starke, Karolin von Korn, T. Szikszay, A. Schwarz, A. May
Objectives: The main objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of aerobic exercise with physiotherapy. A second objective was to evaluate whether patients with pain referred to the head during manual palpation will benefit more from physiotherapy than patients with local or no pain. Methods: A total of 103 patients with migraine received physiotherapy (n = 79) or supervised aerobic exercise (n = 24) according to their preference as an add-on treatment. Both groups had the same contact time with a specialized physiotherapist. The primary outcome measure was headache frequency during the 4 weeks after the intervention. Eighty-seven patients were analyzed at the primary end point (n = 69 in the physiotherapy group; n = 18 in the aerobic exercise group). A follow-up assessment was conducted 3 months after the final intervention. Results: During the initial assessment of the upper cervical spine, 17 patients reported no pain, 45 local pain, and 25 referred pain to the head. Patients in the physiotherapy group had a mean reduction of 1.8 days (standard deviation (SD) 6.07), while patients in the aerobic exercise group had a mean reduction of 1.2 days (SD 4.27) at the primary end point. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.8). The largest improvement was noted in the group that showed referred pain to the head and received physiotherapy (2.13 days (SD 7.82)). Only patients in the physiotherapy group reported a subjectively perceived general improvement. Conclusions: Patients had a strong preference for physiotherapy. Both groups showed small reductions in headache frequency. Effects were superior after physiotherapy but not statistically significant. Patients with pain referred to the head responded best to a physiotherapy intervention.
{"title":"Neck treatment compared to aerobic exercise in migraine: A preference-based clinical trial","authors":"K. Luedtke, W. Starke, Karolin von Korn, T. Szikszay, A. Schwarz, A. May","doi":"10.1177/2515816320930681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320930681","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The main objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of aerobic exercise with physiotherapy. A second objective was to evaluate whether patients with pain referred to the head during manual palpation will benefit more from physiotherapy than patients with local or no pain. Methods: A total of 103 patients with migraine received physiotherapy (n = 79) or supervised aerobic exercise (n = 24) according to their preference as an add-on treatment. Both groups had the same contact time with a specialized physiotherapist. The primary outcome measure was headache frequency during the 4 weeks after the intervention. Eighty-seven patients were analyzed at the primary end point (n = 69 in the physiotherapy group; n = 18 in the aerobic exercise group). A follow-up assessment was conducted 3 months after the final intervention. Results: During the initial assessment of the upper cervical spine, 17 patients reported no pain, 45 local pain, and 25 referred pain to the head. Patients in the physiotherapy group had a mean reduction of 1.8 days (standard deviation (SD) 6.07), while patients in the aerobic exercise group had a mean reduction of 1.2 days (SD 4.27) at the primary end point. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.8). The largest improvement was noted in the group that showed referred pain to the head and received physiotherapy (2.13 days (SD 7.82)). Only patients in the physiotherapy group reported a subjectively perceived general improvement. Conclusions: Patients had a strong preference for physiotherapy. Both groups showed small reductions in headache frequency. Effects were superior after physiotherapy but not statistically significant. Patients with pain referred to the head responded best to a physiotherapy intervention.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320930681","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43452849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-02DOI: 10.1177/2515816320928463
V. Chia, A. Bogdanov, A. Yusuf, L. Kallenbach
Background: Better understanding of migraine treatment in US clinical practice could be facilitated by availability of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire results collected in routine care. We present results for migraine patients with MIDAS collected in routine clinical practice through an electronic medical record (EMR) system that presented the MIDAS questionnaire as an electronic form during the patient office encounter. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to gain better understanding of migraine disability and migraine treatment patterns in US real-world clinical practice. Methods: In this EMR database study, patients were required to have 12 months baseline time for review of patient and clinical characteristics. Adult patients with documentation of migraine with subsequent MIDAS questionnaire data collected between March 2017 and September 2018 were included. Based on MIDAS responses patients were categorized into grade I—little or no disability, grade II—mild disability, grade III—moderate disability, and grade IV—severe disability. Results: This study included 2731 migraine patients with MIDAS results. Overall, 2309 (84.5%) were female with an average age of 46.7 years. Distribution by disability grade was 1161 (42.5%) little or no disability, 424 (15.5%) mild disability, 477 (17.5%) moderate disability, and 669 (24.5%) severe disability. Compared to overall, a larger proportion of patients with severe disability had baseline treatment with acute (71.3% vs. 67.6%) or preventive medications (70.4% vs. 62.0%) and to be on 3+ acute (9.4% vs. 7.0%) or 3+ preventive therapies (17.0% vs. 14.5%). Conclusion: Availability of MIDAS results in usual care provides additional insight into migraine care.
{"title":"Characteristics of migraine patients with Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores in real-world clinical practice","authors":"V. Chia, A. Bogdanov, A. Yusuf, L. Kallenbach","doi":"10.1177/2515816320928463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320928463","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Better understanding of migraine treatment in US clinical practice could be facilitated by availability of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire results collected in routine care. We present results for migraine patients with MIDAS collected in routine clinical practice through an electronic medical record (EMR) system that presented the MIDAS questionnaire as an electronic form during the patient office encounter. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to gain better understanding of migraine disability and migraine treatment patterns in US real-world clinical practice. Methods: In this EMR database study, patients were required to have 12 months baseline time for review of patient and clinical characteristics. Adult patients with documentation of migraine with subsequent MIDAS questionnaire data collected between March 2017 and September 2018 were included. Based on MIDAS responses patients were categorized into grade I—little or no disability, grade II—mild disability, grade III—moderate disability, and grade IV—severe disability. Results: This study included 2731 migraine patients with MIDAS results. Overall, 2309 (84.5%) were female with an average age of 46.7 years. Distribution by disability grade was 1161 (42.5%) little or no disability, 424 (15.5%) mild disability, 477 (17.5%) moderate disability, and 669 (24.5%) severe disability. Compared to overall, a larger proportion of patients with severe disability had baseline treatment with acute (71.3% vs. 67.6%) or preventive medications (70.4% vs. 62.0%) and to be on 3+ acute (9.4% vs. 7.0%) or 3+ preventive therapies (17.0% vs. 14.5%). Conclusion: Availability of MIDAS results in usual care provides additional insight into migraine care.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320928463","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47528068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-05-07DOI: 10.1177/2515816320923592
Sara Pérez Pereda, María Toriello Suárez, Vicente González Quintanilla, A. Oterino
Background: Methylation of two CpG sites related to neuronal pentraxin II protein (NPTX2) and SH2 domain containing 5 protein (SH2D5), corresponding to two neuroplasticity genes, has been associated to headache chronification. We aimed to investigate the epigenetic modification of these two genes in chronic migraine (CM). Methods: We conducted a case–control study in which the DNA of 305 age- and sex-matched subjects classified according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders version beta (ICHD-III β) in CM (109), episodic migraine (EM; n = 98), and healthy controls (HC; 98) was analyzed. Real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR was performed using specific methylation primers for two representative CpG sites within these genes. Results: We found no significant differences in methylation level between CM, EM, and HC in the first exon of the NPTX2 gene nor in the 5′ upstream region of the SH2D5 gene. Methylation level in the first exon of the NPTX2 showed a low correlation with age (r = 0.266; p < 0.005). Conclusion: We did not find methylation level differences in analyzed regions related to NPTX2 and SH2D5 in our CM sample. Despite the potential relevance of neuroplasticity genes in headache chronification, we conclude that CM is a more heterogeneous clinical diagnosis than desired and that an epigenetic marker remains elusive.
{"title":"Methylation analysis of NPTX2 and SH2D5 genes in chronic migraine: A case–control study","authors":"Sara Pérez Pereda, María Toriello Suárez, Vicente González Quintanilla, A. Oterino","doi":"10.1177/2515816320923592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320923592","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Methylation of two CpG sites related to neuronal pentraxin II protein (NPTX2) and SH2 domain containing 5 protein (SH2D5), corresponding to two neuroplasticity genes, has been associated to headache chronification. We aimed to investigate the epigenetic modification of these two genes in chronic migraine (CM). Methods: We conducted a case–control study in which the DNA of 305 age- and sex-matched subjects classified according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders version beta (ICHD-III β) in CM (109), episodic migraine (EM; n = 98), and healthy controls (HC; 98) was analyzed. Real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR was performed using specific methylation primers for two representative CpG sites within these genes. Results: We found no significant differences in methylation level between CM, EM, and HC in the first exon of the NPTX2 gene nor in the 5′ upstream region of the SH2D5 gene. Methylation level in the first exon of the NPTX2 showed a low correlation with age (r = 0.266; p < 0.005). Conclusion: We did not find methylation level differences in analyzed regions related to NPTX2 and SH2D5 in our CM sample. Despite the potential relevance of neuroplasticity genes in headache chronification, we conclude that CM is a more heterogeneous clinical diagnosis than desired and that an epigenetic marker remains elusive.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320923592","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42567900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-18DOI: 10.1177/2515816320919961
Banafsheh Shakibajahromi, A. Borhani-Haghighi, H. Vardanjani, Mehrnaz Ghaedian, F. Feiz, A. Safari, Etrat Hooshmandi, A. Mowla
We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome, hospital stay, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) development of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) who presented with isolated headache. In a retrospective study, consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of CVST referred to Namazi hospital (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) from 2012 to 2016 were included. Clinical, radiological, and prognostic characteristics and outcome on discharge (using modified Rankin Scale (mRS)) were compared between the CVST patients who presented with isolated headache and other CVST patients through univariate analyses. The associations of isolated headache with poor outcome (mRS > 2), presence or development of ICH, and duration of hospital stay were assessed through multivariable analyses. Of the 174 patients, 45 (26.0%) presented with isolated headache. Presence of isolated headache was more frequent in men (p value = 0.048) and patients with thrombophilia (p value = 0.040). Lateral sinus involvement was more common in patients with isolated headache (p value = 0.005). After adjustment for other variables, the isolated headache was significantly associated with shorter hospital stay (odds ratio (OR): 0.85, confidence interval (CI): 0.73–0.99) and lower risk of early ICH (OR: 0.314, CI: 0.132–0.749). Although poor outcome was significantly less frequent in patients with isolated headache on univariate analysis (p value < 0.001), this association was not significant in multivariable analysis (OR: 0.324, CI: 0.035–2.985). CVST patients with isolated headache had lower ICH events and shorter hospital stay. CVST should be considered as a possible differential diagnosis in certain patients who present only with headache, particularly those with diffuse progressive headache, or underlying provocative conditions.
{"title":"Isolated headache and its association with characteristics and outcome of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis","authors":"Banafsheh Shakibajahromi, A. Borhani-Haghighi, H. Vardanjani, Mehrnaz Ghaedian, F. Feiz, A. Safari, Etrat Hooshmandi, A. Mowla","doi":"10.1177/2515816320919961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320919961","url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome, hospital stay, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) development of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) who presented with isolated headache. In a retrospective study, consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of CVST referred to Namazi hospital (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) from 2012 to 2016 were included. Clinical, radiological, and prognostic characteristics and outcome on discharge (using modified Rankin Scale (mRS)) were compared between the CVST patients who presented with isolated headache and other CVST patients through univariate analyses. The associations of isolated headache with poor outcome (mRS > 2), presence or development of ICH, and duration of hospital stay were assessed through multivariable analyses. Of the 174 patients, 45 (26.0%) presented with isolated headache. Presence of isolated headache was more frequent in men (p value = 0.048) and patients with thrombophilia (p value = 0.040). Lateral sinus involvement was more common in patients with isolated headache (p value = 0.005). After adjustment for other variables, the isolated headache was significantly associated with shorter hospital stay (odds ratio (OR): 0.85, confidence interval (CI): 0.73–0.99) and lower risk of early ICH (OR: 0.314, CI: 0.132–0.749). Although poor outcome was significantly less frequent in patients with isolated headache on univariate analysis (p value < 0.001), this association was not significant in multivariable analysis (OR: 0.324, CI: 0.035–2.985). CVST patients with isolated headache had lower ICH events and shorter hospital stay. CVST should be considered as a possible differential diagnosis in certain patients who present only with headache, particularly those with diffuse progressive headache, or underlying provocative conditions.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320919961","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43701681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-03DOI: 10.1177/2515816320908262
Fátima López González, I. B. Blasco, C. Ferrí
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache (Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform headache attacks with Conjunctival injection and Tearing (SUNCT)/Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform headache attacks with Autonomic Symptoms) is a trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia with difficult treatment and its management is based on neuromodulator drugs and sometimes ablative procedures on the trigeminal nerve. A positive response to occipital anesthetic blocks and peripheral and deep neurostimulation has also been described. We present the case of a patient with criteria of left SUNCT and transient response to occipital anesthetic blocks, satisfactorily controlled with pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the occipital nerve. Upon examination, the patient had tenderness in the left greater occipital nerve (GON). Blockade was performed with anesthetic and corticosteroid, obtaining a highly positive but transient response. After several nerve blocks, the patient was referred to the Pain Unit where pulsed radiofrequency on the left GON was performed. After two sessions, more than 90% of reduction of pain was achieved, maintained for 12 months. There haven’t been found data in the literature on the use of GON PRF for the treatment of SUNCT, while there are descriptions for other types of cranial pain. The intention of our case is to make this procedure to be considered as an alternative for the treatment of this entity in patients who respond to anesthetic blocks.
{"title":"Pulsed radiofrequency on the occipital nerve for treatment of short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache: A case report","authors":"Fátima López González, I. B. Blasco, C. Ferrí","doi":"10.1177/2515816320908262","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320908262","url":null,"abstract":"Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache (Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform headache attacks with Conjunctival injection and Tearing (SUNCT)/Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform headache attacks with Autonomic Symptoms) is a trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia with difficult treatment and its management is based on neuromodulator drugs and sometimes ablative procedures on the trigeminal nerve. A positive response to occipital anesthetic blocks and peripheral and deep neurostimulation has also been described. We present the case of a patient with criteria of left SUNCT and transient response to occipital anesthetic blocks, satisfactorily controlled with pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the occipital nerve. Upon examination, the patient had tenderness in the left greater occipital nerve (GON). Blockade was performed with anesthetic and corticosteroid, obtaining a highly positive but transient response. After several nerve blocks, the patient was referred to the Pain Unit where pulsed radiofrequency on the left GON was performed. After two sessions, more than 90% of reduction of pain was achieved, maintained for 12 months. There haven’t been found data in the literature on the use of GON PRF for the treatment of SUNCT, while there are descriptions for other types of cranial pain. The intention of our case is to make this procedure to be considered as an alternative for the treatment of this entity in patients who respond to anesthetic blocks.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320908262","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43715968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-02DOI: 10.1177/2515816320915696
Anthony Khoo, M. Kiley, P. Goadsby
The management of external cold-stimulus headache has previously focused on trigger avoidance, which can be an impractical and sometimes impossible solution. We describe the case of a 20-year-old woman who presented with a typical example of external cold-stimulus headache, and in whom a preventive regime of naproxen taken 30 min prior to cold exposure was associated with reliable prevention of cold-induced headache symptoms. This could be an effective strategy for managing patients with cold-stimulus headache for whom cold triggers cannot be avoided.
{"title":"Managing external cold-stimulus headache with preventive naproxen","authors":"Anthony Khoo, M. Kiley, P. Goadsby","doi":"10.1177/2515816320915696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515816320915696","url":null,"abstract":"The management of external cold-stimulus headache has previously focused on trigger avoidance, which can be an impractical and sometimes impossible solution. We describe the case of a 20-year-old woman who presented with a typical example of external cold-stimulus headache, and in whom a preventive regime of naproxen taken 30 min prior to cold exposure was associated with reliable prevention of cold-induced headache symptoms. This could be an effective strategy for managing patients with cold-stimulus headache for whom cold triggers cannot be avoided.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2515816320915696","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46096031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：