The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the coping strategies – distraction and redefining – on pain experience in individuals with internal vs. external locus of control.
Method
The participants were exposed to pain induced by cold pressor procedure. Pain tolerance, pain intensity, and objective and subjective duration of pain were measured in three different situations. In the control situation, the participants did not use any cognitive pain coping strategy. In two other situations, they used distraction and redefining strategies, respectively.
Results
Internally- and externally-oriented participants did not differ in pain tolerance, pain intensity ratings, and subjective duration of painful stimulation in any of the three situations. The use of cognitive pain coping strategies increased pain tolerance in both groups in comparison with the control situation. In both situations, the participants underestimated the duration of pain tolerance. There was no difference between the effectiveness of distraction and redefining strategies on pain tolerance and pain intensity ratings.
Conclusion
Cognitive pain coping strategies increase the duration of pain tolerance irrespective of the individual's locus of control, but have no effect on pain intensity rating.
{"title":"Effects of cognitive pain coping strategies and locus of control on perception of cold pressor pain in healthy individuals: Experimental study","authors":"Natasa Jokic-Begic , Dragutin Ivanec , Dragana Markanovic","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the coping strategies – distraction and redefining – on pain experience in individuals with internal vs. external locus of control.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The participants were exposed to pain induced by cold pressor procedure. Pain tolerance, pain intensity, and objective and subjective duration of pain were measured in three different situations. In the control situation, the participants did not use any cognitive pain coping strategy. In two other situations, they used distraction and redefining strategies, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Internally- and externally-oriented participants did not differ in pain tolerance, pain intensity ratings, and subjective duration of painful stimulation in any of the three situations. The use of cognitive pain coping strategies increased pain tolerance in both groups in comparison with the control situation. In both situations, the participants underestimated the duration of pain tolerance. There was no difference between the effectiveness of distraction and redefining strategies on pain tolerance and pain intensity ratings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cognitive pain coping strategies increase the duration of pain tolerance irrespective of the individual's locus of control, but have no effect on pain intensity rating.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91680212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-12-01DOI: 10.1016/J.ACPAIN.2009.09.002
C. Ball, P. Claydon
{"title":"Continuing use of droperidol in patient-controlled analgesia with morphine","authors":"C. Ball, P. Claydon","doi":"10.1016/J.ACPAIN.2009.09.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACPAIN.2009.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"24 1","pages":"143-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73606458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.003
Nicholas D. Moore
The choice of an oral analgesic is an important determinant in achieving effective pain relief. Properties of an ‘ideal analgesic’ required for the management of acute pain are discussed and current evidence for the suitability of available analgesics – acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (such as ibuprofen), opioids and combination therapy – is reviewed. The hypothesis that an ‘ideal analgesic’ for acute pain should have a rapid onset of action, act over an extended period of time, reduce awareness of pain quickly and minimise interruption by pain, be well tolerated and produce analgesia over a wide range of pain types in different patient populations, is proposed herein. Currently available analgesics may fulfil only some of these characteristics and, because individual patient response also varies, the challenge is to define what constitutes an acceptable analgesic for a specific patient or pain type.
Various tools for measurement of each of these characteristics exist, but there is currently no single measure to determine the ‘ideal analgesic’ for a specific patient with a specific pain type that takes into account all the characteristics of an ‘ideal analgesic’ and provides an overall measure to quantify the quality of relief produced.
{"title":"In search of an ideal analgesic for common acute pain","authors":"Nicholas D. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The choice of an oral analgesic is an important determinant in achieving effective pain relief. Properties of an ‘ideal analgesic’ required for the management of acute pain are discussed and current evidence for the suitability of available analgesics – </span>acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (such as ibuprofen), opioids and combination therapy – is reviewed. The hypothesis that an ‘ideal analgesic’ for acute pain should have a rapid onset of action, act over an extended period of time, reduce awareness of pain quickly and minimise interruption by pain, be well tolerated and produce analgesia over a wide range of pain types in different patient populations, is proposed herein. Currently available analgesics may fulfil only some of these characteristics and, because individual patient response also varies, the challenge is to define what constitutes an acceptable analgesic for a specific patient or pain type.</p><p>Various tools for measurement of each of these characteristics exist, but there is currently no single measure to determine the ‘ideal analgesic’ for a specific patient with a specific pain type that takes into account all the characteristics of an ‘ideal analgesic’ and provides an overall measure to quantify the quality of relief produced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 129-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91680891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2009.07.003
YuSheng Liu , QingSong Zhao , XiRong Guo , XiaoFeng Shen , YuZhu Peng , ShiQin Xu , XiaoHong Li , ShanWu Feng , FuZhou Wang
Background
Issues associated with the analgesic failure are major contributors to diminished postoperative health quality. The aim of this survey was to investigate the risk factors associated with anaesthesiologists for inadequate postoperative pain management, i.e. ≥3 cm in a 10 cm gauge of Visual Analog Scale.
Methods
A total of 1162 confidential questionnaires were sent by mail to anaesthesiologists in clinical hospitals. Information was queried on the incidence of inadequate postoperative pain management with different length of experience in anaesthesia, reasons for such incidence and possible rescue treatments after the occurrence of the incidence, and knowledge in terms of analgesia protocols. Education background and working settings were requested as the contributing factors.
Results
In 813 returned questionnaires, 798 were completed and the data were valid for analysis (68.7% valid response rate). Approximately 43% reported encountered at least one or more incidents of inadequate postoperative analgesia. All positive answers indicated inadequate postoperative analgesia was related to types of surgery. A multiple logistic regression (r2 = 0.74, P < 0.0001) analysis revealed that age, length of anaesthesia experience, education background and work environment are four risk factors in contributing to the incidence. Patient-controlled analgesia is the first choice for postoperative pain therapy, and opioids are preferred as the rescue drugs for inadequate postoperative analgesia.
Conclusions
Inadequate postoperative analgesia occurs widely. Age, length of anaesthesia experience, education background and the working environment of anaesthesiologists are risk factors for inadequate postoperative pain control.
背景:与镇痛失效相关的问题是术后健康质量下降的主要原因。本调查的目的是调查麻醉医生术后疼痛管理不充分的危险因素,即在10cm的视觉模拟量表中≥3cm。方法邮寄保密问卷1162份给临床医院麻醉医师。询问不同麻醉经验的患者术后疼痛管理不充分的发生率、发生原因、发生后可能的抢救措施以及对镇痛方案的了解情况。教育背景和工作环境被认为是影响因素。结果共回收问卷813份,完成问卷798份,有效回复率为68.7%。大约43%的患者报告至少遇到过一次或多次术后镇痛不足的事件。所有阳性答案均表明术后镇痛不足与手术类型有关。多元logistic回归分析(r2 = 0.74, P <0.0001)分析显示,年龄、麻醉经验长度、教育背景和工作环境是导致发病率的四个危险因素。患者自控镇痛是术后疼痛治疗的首选,阿片类药物是术后镇痛不足的首选抢救药物。结论术后适当的镇痛是普遍存在的。麻醉医师的年龄、麻醉经验、教育背景和工作环境是术后疼痛控制不足的危险因素。
{"title":"Anaesthesiologist-associated risk factors for inadequate postoperative pain management","authors":"YuSheng Liu , QingSong Zhao , XiRong Guo , XiaoFeng Shen , YuZhu Peng , ShiQin Xu , XiaoHong Li , ShanWu Feng , FuZhou Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Issues associated with the analgesic failure are major contributors to diminished postoperative health quality. The aim of this survey was to investigate the risk factors associated with anaesthesiologists for inadequate postoperative pain management, i.e. ≥3<!--> <!-->cm in a 10<!--> <!-->cm gauge of Visual Analog Scale.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 1162 confidential questionnaires were sent by mail to anaesthesiologists in clinical hospitals. Information was queried on the incidence of inadequate postoperative pain management with different length of experience in anaesthesia, reasons for such incidence and possible rescue treatments after the occurrence of the incidence, and knowledge in terms of analgesia protocols. Education background and working settings were requested as the contributing factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 813 returned questionnaires, 798 were completed and the data were valid for analysis (68.7% valid response rate). Approximately 43% reported encountered at least one or more incidents of inadequate postoperative analgesia. All positive answers indicated inadequate postoperative analgesia was related to types of surgery. A multiple logistic regression (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.74, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001) analysis revealed that age, length of anaesthesia experience, education background and work environment are four risk factors in contributing to the incidence. Patient-controlled analgesia is the first choice for postoperative pain therapy, and opioids are preferred as the rescue drugs for inadequate postoperative analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Inadequate postoperative analgesia occurs widely. Age, length of anaesthesia experience, education background and the working environment of anaesthesiologists are risk factors for inadequate postoperative pain control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.07.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72552315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.021
A.K. Chang, P.E. Bijur, M. Davitt, E.J. Gallagher
{"title":"Randomized clinical trial comparing a patient-driven titration protocol of intravenous hydromorphone with traditional physician-driven management of emergency department patients with acute severe pain","authors":"A.K. Chang, P.E. Bijur, M. Davitt, E.J. Gallagher","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 152-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91593557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.012
J.R. Miner
{"title":"Randomized double-blind placebo controlled crossover study of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, acetaminophen/hydrocodone, and placebo for the relief of pain from a standard painful stimulus","authors":"J.R. Miner","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 148-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91614619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2009-12-01DOI: 10.1016/J.ACPAIN.2009.07.004
S. Saha, Eldor L. Brish, K. Boddu
{"title":"Phantom limb like pain and sensations in an intact lower extremity","authors":"S. Saha, Eldor L. Brish, K. Boddu","doi":"10.1016/J.ACPAIN.2009.07.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACPAIN.2009.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"18 1","pages":"139-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79484754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}