首页 > 最新文献

Acute Pain最新文献

英文 中文
Management of pain in a surgical emergency unit—Underlying factors affecting its delivery 外科急诊科疼痛的处理——影响疼痛产生的潜在因素
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.013
D. Grenman, L. Niemi-Murola, E. Kalso

Background

Pain is an important symptom in emergency departments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible obstacles to pain management in a surgical emergency department.

Methods

All patients arriving in the ED (N = 100) during the time period were asked to participate in an interview. Information about medication, patient history, and documented pain intensity were extracted from patient records. In addition, a questionnaire with six demographic and 31 pain-related items was distributed to 50 physicians and 82 nurses.

Results

Pain was the most important symptom of 60.3% (N = 46) of the respondents. Severe pain was reported by 45.8% of the patients. Analgesics were administered to 46.6% of the respondents (N = 34). None of the patients received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatoric analgesics (NSAIDs). Male gender, lower educational level and high age correlated with reluctance to accept analgesics. Experience of pain and the healthcare system correlated with unwillingness to talk about pain. The nurses were more positive towards measurement of pain (p < 0.05) and encouragement (p < 0.001) than the physicians. The physicians were less concerned about problems with analgesics than the nurses (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The patients should be encouraged to talk about their pain. The emergency department personnel needs education about measurement of pain and pain medication.

背景疼痛是急诊科的一个重要症状。本研究的目的是评估外科急诊科疼痛管理可能存在的障碍。方法对100例在此时间段内就诊的急诊科患者进行访谈。从患者记录中提取有关药物、患者病史和疼痛强度的信息。此外,还向50名医生和82名护士发放了一份包含6个人口学统计和31个疼痛相关项目的问卷。结果西班牙是最重要的症状,占60.3% (N = 46)。45.8%的患者报告剧烈疼痛。46.6%的受访者(N = 34)使用了镇痛药。所有患者均未接受非甾体抗炎镇痛药(NSAIDs)治疗。男性、低文化程度和高年龄与不愿接受镇痛药相关。疼痛体验和医疗系统与不愿谈论疼痛相关。护士对疼痛测量更积极(p <p <0.001)。与护士相比,内科医生更不关心镇痛药的问题(p <0.01)。结论应鼓励患者谈论疼痛。急诊科人员需要接受关于疼痛测量和止痛药的教育。
{"title":"Management of pain in a surgical emergency unit—Underlying factors affecting its delivery","authors":"D. Grenman,&nbsp;L. Niemi-Murola,&nbsp;E. Kalso","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain is an important symptom in emergency departments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible obstacles to pain management in a surgical emergency department.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients arriving in the ED (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100) during the time period were asked to participate in an interview. Information about medication, patient history, and documented pain intensity were extracted from patient records. In addition, a questionnaire with six demographic and 31 pain-related items was distributed to 50 physicians and 82 nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pain was the most important symptom of 60.3% (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>46) of the respondents. Severe pain was reported by 45.8% of the patients. Analgesics were administered to 46.6% of the respondents (</span><em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->34). None of the patients received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatoric analgesics (NSAIDs). Male gender, lower educational level and high age correlated with reluctance to accept analgesics. Experience of pain and the healthcare system correlated with unwillingness to talk about pain. The nurses were more positive towards measurement of pain (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and encouragement (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) than the physicians. The physicians were less concerned about problems with analgesics than the nurses (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The patients should be encouraged to talk about their pain. The emergency department personnel needs education about measurement of pain and pain medication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78008550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
A comparison of the efficacy and rate of side-effects of mefenamic acid and naproxen in adult patients following elective tonsillectomy: A randomized double-blind study 甲氧胺酸和萘普生在成人选择性扁桃体切除术后的疗效和副反应率的比较:一项随机双盲研究
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.003
G. Graf , M. Jelen , D. Jamnig , H. Schabus , W. Pipam , R. Likar

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and side-effects of mefenamic acid as compared to naproxen administered postoperatively to patients following elective tonsillectomy.

Methods

Fifty patients received either naproxen or mefenamic acid given postoperatively in a randomized fashion following elective tonsillectomy. General anaesthesia for the tonsillectomies was administered in a standardized fashion. Pain intensity was assessed postoperatively at rest and on exertion using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and analgesic consumption. The side-effects were also documented.

Results

Forty-one patients were included in the assessment. There were no significant differences with respect to the demographic data. After the 48th postoperative hour the NRS score demonstrated a significant difference in pain intensity at rest and on exertion in favour of the mefenamic acid group. There was no difference in the rate of side-effects between the two groups.

Conclusion

Mefenamic acid is a more effective analgesic than naproxen given postoperatively following elective tonsillectomies.

本研究的目的是评估甲氧胺酸与萘普生对选择性扁桃体切除术后患者的疗效和副作用。方法50例择期扁桃体切除术后随机给予萘普生或甲氧胺酸治疗。扁桃体切除术的全身麻醉以标准化的方式进行。采用数值评定量表(NRS)和镇痛药用量评估术后休息和运动时的疼痛强度。副作用也有记录。结果41例患者纳入评估。在人口统计数据方面没有显著差异。术后48小时后,NRS评分显示休息和运动时的疼痛强度有显著差异,甲胺酸组更有利。两组之间的副作用发生率没有差异。结论甲氧胺酸是选择性扁桃体切除术后较萘普生更有效的镇痛药。
{"title":"A comparison of the efficacy and rate of side-effects of mefenamic acid and naproxen in adult patients following elective tonsillectomy: A randomized double-blind study","authors":"G. Graf ,&nbsp;M. Jelen ,&nbsp;D. Jamnig ,&nbsp;H. Schabus ,&nbsp;W. Pipam ,&nbsp;R. Likar","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and side-effects of mefenamic acid as compared to </span>naproxen<span> administered postoperatively to patients following elective tonsillectomy.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty patients received either naproxen or mefenamic acid given postoperatively in a randomized fashion following elective tonsillectomy. General anaesthesia<span><span> for the tonsillectomies was administered in a standardized fashion. Pain intensity was assessed postoperatively at rest and on exertion using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and </span>analgesic consumption. The side-effects were also documented.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-one patients were included in the assessment. There were no significant differences with respect to the demographic data. After the 48th postoperative hour the NRS score demonstrated a significant difference in pain intensity at rest and on exertion in favour of the mefenamic acid group. There was no difference in the rate of side-effects between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Mefenamic acid is a more effective analgesic than naproxen given postoperatively following elective tonsillectomies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74213194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section 硬膜外吗啡用于剖宫产术后镇痛
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.001
Shymala Kumarasamy, Y.C. Choy

Introduction

This prospective randomized double-blind study compared the effectiveness and duration of analgesia of epidural morphine 4 mg and 5 mg for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section.

Materials and methods

Sixty ASA I and II patients were randomized into 2 groups, Group A received epidural morphine 4 mg while Group B received epidural morphine 5 mg. All patients were provided with patient controlled analgesia (PCAM), for use as rescue analgesia. Pain was assessed using visual analogue score at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h. Time to first demand of patient controlled analgesia, cumulative morphine consumption and side effects were documented.

Results

The VAS for pain was significantly lower in Group B at 16, 20 and 24 h. The mean cumulative PCAM consumption was significantly lower in Group B. The incidence of nausea, vomiting (PONV) and pruritus was significantly higher in Group B, p < 0.05. There was no incidence of excessive sedation or respiratory depression.

Conclusion

Epidural morphine 5 mg provided adequate and longer duration of analgesia but resulted in higher frequency of pruritus and vomiting.

本前瞻性随机双盲研究比较了硬膜外吗啡4mg和5mg用于剖宫产术后镇痛的有效性和持续时间。材料与方法60例ASAⅰ、ⅱ型患者随机分为2组,A组给予硬膜外吗啡4 mg, B组给予硬膜外吗啡5 mg。所有患者均给予患者自控镇痛(PCAM),作为抢救镇痛。在4、8、12、16、20和24小时用视觉模拟评分评估疼痛。记录患者首次自控镇痛所需时间、吗啡累积用量和副作用。结果B组患者疼痛VAS评分在16、20、24 h均明显低于对照组,PCAM平均累计消耗明显低于对照组,恶心、呕吐(PONV)、瘙痒发生率明显高于对照组,p <0.05. 没有发生过度镇静或呼吸抑制。结论硬膜外吗啡5mg镇痛效果充分,持续时间长,但瘙痒、呕吐发生率较高。
{"title":"Epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section","authors":"Shymala Kumarasamy,&nbsp;Y.C. Choy","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This prospective randomized double-blind study compared the effectiveness and duration of analgesia of epidural morphine 4<!--> <!-->mg and 5<!--> <span>mg for postoperative analgesia<span> after Caesarean section.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>Sixty ASA I and II patients were randomized into 2 groups, Group A received epidural morphine 4</span> <!-->mg while Group B received epidural morphine 5<!--> <span>mg. All patients were provided with patient controlled analgesia (PCAM), for use as rescue analgesia. Pain was assessed using visual analogue score at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24</span> <!-->h. Time to first demand of patient controlled analgesia, cumulative morphine consumption and side effects were documented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The VAS for pain was significantly lower in Group B at 16, 20 and 24<!--> <!-->h. The mean cumulative PCAM consumption was significantly lower in Group B. The incidence of nausea, vomiting (PONV) and pruritus was significantly higher in Group B, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>0.05. There was no incidence of excessive sedation or respiratory depression.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Epidural morphine 5<!--> <!-->mg provided adequate and longer duration of analgesia but resulted in higher frequency of pruritus and vomiting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 117-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.07.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75287713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Acute neuropathic pain: Amputations 急性神经性疼痛:截肢
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.006
{"title":"Acute neuropathic pain: Amputations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 189-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92237085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intranasal ketamine for acute pain 鼻内氯胺酮治疗急性疼痛
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.013
{"title":"Intranasal ketamine for acute pain","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 193-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92248976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A novel parenteral NSAID in acute pain management 一种新型非甾体抗炎药在急性疼痛管理中的应用
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.010
{"title":"A novel parenteral NSAID in acute pain management","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 165-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137278797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A cross-sectional study of the role of Canadian nurses with a specialty practice in pain management 加拿大护士在疼痛管理专业实践中的作用横断面研究
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.09.002
Mona Sawhney , Jason Sawyer

Purpose

To explore and describe the role of nurses working in a specialty practice of pain management in Canada.

Methods

A convenience sample of 60 nurses from across Canada with a specialty practice in pain management completed a self-administered questionnaire, which covered a broad range of topics including demographic data, sources of pain education, role responsibilities, positive outcomes and challenges of the role.

Results

Forty-six nurses responded with the majority of respondents from Ontario. Most of nurses worked at a University affiliated teaching hospital, and were baccalaureate or masters prepared, with 28% completing nurse practitioner preparation. The main clinical responsibility of the role involved daily patient visits, with 78% of nurses performing daily patient visits independently. Nurses were also engaged in pain management education for: health care professionals in the hospital setting, students in educational institutions and presentations at conferences. Other role components included administrative, research and leadership responsibilities. Identified benefits of the role include increased accessibility and continuity of care, the ability to act as a liaison between members of the health care team, and increased patient satisfaction. Identified challenges of the role fell into four broad categories including role implementation, clinical tools and support, health care provider education, and administrative support.

Conclusion

This study builds on previous work examining the role of nurses in pain management. Respondents to the survey reported several benefits and challenges to the role of nurses with a specialty practice in pain management.

目的探讨和描述护士在加拿大疼痛管理专业实践中的作用。方法选择加拿大60名具有疼痛管理专业实践经验的护士,填写一份自我填写的问卷,问卷内容包括人口统计数据、疼痛教育来源、角色职责、积极结果和角色挑战等。结果共有46名护士进行了问卷调查,其中大部分来自安大略省。大多数护士在大学附属教学医院工作,具有学士或硕士学位,28%的护士完成了护士执业准备。该角色的主要临床责任涉及日常患者就诊,78%的护士独立完成日常患者就诊。护士还从事疼痛管理教育,对象包括:医院的保健专业人员、教育机构的学生和会议上的演讲。其他角色组成部分包括行政、研究和领导职责。已确定的该角色的好处包括增加了护理的可及性和连续性,能够作为保健团队成员之间的联络人,并提高了患者满意度。已确定的角色挑战可分为四大类,包括角色实施、临床工具和支持、保健提供者教育和行政支持。结论:本研究建立在先前的研究护士在疼痛管理中的作用的基础上。调查的受访者报告了在疼痛管理方面具有专业实践的护士角色的几个好处和挑战。
{"title":"A cross-sectional study of the role of Canadian nurses with a specialty practice in pain management","authors":"Mona Sawhney ,&nbsp;Jason Sawyer","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore and describe the role of nurses working in a specialty practice of pain management in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A convenience sample of 60 nurses from across Canada with a specialty practice in pain management completed a self-administered questionnaire, which covered a broad range of topics including demographic data, sources of pain education, role responsibilities, positive outcomes and challenges of the role.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Forty-six nurses responded with the majority of respondents from Ontario. Most of nurses worked at a University affiliated teaching hospital, and were baccalaureate or masters prepared, with 28% completing nurse practitioner preparation. The main clinical responsibility of the role involved daily patient visits, with 78% of nurses performing daily patient visits independently. Nurses were also engaged in pain management education for: </span>health care<span> professionals in the hospital setting, students in educational institutions and presentations at conferences. Other role components included administrative, research and leadership responsibilities. Identified benefits of the role include increased accessibility and continuity of care, the ability to act as a liaison between members of the health care team, and increased patient satisfaction. Identified challenges of the role fell into four broad categories including role implementation, clinical tools and support, health care provider education, and administrative support.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study builds on previous work examining the role of nurses in pain management. Respondents to the survey reported several benefits and challenges to the role of nurses with a specialty practice in pain management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 151-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.09.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74933895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Spinal cord injury pain 脊髓损伤疼痛
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.020
{"title":"Spinal cord injury pain","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 187-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92237082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute neuropathic pain: Pain in neurological diseases 急性神经性疼痛:神经性疾病的疼痛
Pub Date : 2008-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.017
{"title":"Acute neuropathic pain: Pain in neurological diseases","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 3","pages":"Page 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.08.017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92237084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology of renal colic in a district general hospital 某地区综合医院肾绞痛流行病学分析
Pub Date : 2008-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.015
A. Trinchieri, S. Cappoli, N. Esposito, P. Acquati
{"title":"Epidemiology of renal colic in a district general hospital","authors":"A. Trinchieri,&nbsp;S. Cappoli,&nbsp;N. Esposito,&nbsp;P. Acquati","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"10 2","pages":"Page 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2008.05.015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74062346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
期刊
Acute Pain
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1