首页 > 最新文献

Advances in Archaeomaterials最新文献

英文 中文
The Decoration and Firing of Ancient Greek Pottery: A Review of Recent Investigations 古希腊陶器的装饰与烧制:最新研究综述
Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.07.002
Richard Jones

The wealth and diversity of decoration on Greek pottery continues to attract science-based attention. The availability of increasingly powerful analytical techniques has allowed the nature of the decoration to be investigated in ever-finer detail, down to the nano-particle level. Such work has gone hand in hand with replication experiments ranging from sourcing raw materials to experimental firing. As a result, there is a fuller understanding of the many material and other factors controlling the quality of a range of painted or coloured decorations, most notably black gloss, seen to best effect in the Black and Red Figure–style vases of Attic potters-painters in the sixth to fourth centuries BC. Light has also been shed on the manner in which a few of these craftspeople adapted established techniques to give special effects.

Reviewing the progress made on the decoration and firing of several pottery classes as well as other ceramics, such as terracotta figurines, this paper places this information into context in two ways. On the one hand, it covers the corresponding evidence for the decoration and firing of pottery of the Greek Neolithic and Bronze Age to chart diachronically the craft's technological development. On the other hand, it considers recent archaeological evidence for ceramic production.

希腊陶器装饰的丰富性和多样性继续吸引着以科学为基础的关注。越来越强大的分析技术的可用性已经允许对装饰的性质进行更精细的细节研究,直到纳米颗粒水平。这些工作与从原料采购到实验烧制的复制实验密切相关。因此,人们对控制一系列彩绘或彩色装饰质量的许多材料和其他因素有了更全面的了解,最值得注意的是黑色光泽,在公元前6至4世纪阿提卡陶工的黑色和红色人物风格花瓶中效果最好。光也洒在方式,其中一些工匠适应既定的技术,以给予特殊效果。本文从两方面回顾了几种陶器以及陶俑等其他陶瓷的装饰和烧制的进展。一方面,它涵盖了希腊新石器时代和青铜器时代陶器的装饰和烧制的相应证据,以历时的方式描绘该工艺的技术发展。另一方面,它考虑了陶瓷生产的最新考古证据。
{"title":"The Decoration and Firing of Ancient Greek Pottery: A Review of Recent Investigations","authors":"Richard Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The wealth and diversity of decoration on Greek pottery continues to attract science-based attention. The availability of increasingly powerful analytical techniques has allowed the nature of the decoration to be investigated in ever-finer detail, down to the nano-particle level. Such work has gone hand in hand with replication experiments ranging from sourcing raw materials to experimental firing. As a result, there is a fuller understanding of the many material and other factors controlling the quality of a range of painted or coloured decorations, most notably black gloss, seen to best effect in the Black and Red Figure–style vases of Attic potters-painters in the sixth to fourth centuries BC. Light has also been shed on the manner in which a few of these craftspeople adapted established techniques to give special effects.</p><p>Reviewing the progress made on the decoration and firing of several pottery classes as well as other ceramics, such as terracotta figurines, this paper places this information into context in two ways. On the one hand, it covers the corresponding evidence for the decoration and firing of pottery of the Greek Neolithic and Bronze Age to chart diachronically the craft's technological development. On the other hand, it considers recent archaeological evidence for ceramic production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 67-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667136021000078/pdfft?md5=7d811064bb23297c76c36b3952adacab&pid=1-s2.0-S2667136021000078-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75066164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The anthropology of technology and a new paradigm for archaeometallurgical research? 技术人类学与考古学研究的新范式?
Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.08.001
Bryan Pfaffenberger
{"title":"The anthropology of technology and a new paradigm for archaeometallurgical research?","authors":"Bryan Pfaffenberger","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.08.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aia.2021.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aia.2021.08.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72293342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
An AAS study of Chinese imperial yellow porcelain bodies and their place in the history of Jingdezhen's porcelain development 中国御黄瓷胎及其在景德镇瓷器发展史上的地位
Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.09.002
Nigel Wood

The bodies of 12 examples of imperial yellow Chinese porcelain dating from the early sixteenth century to the early twentieth century have been studied by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The yellow lead glaze was reserved for imperial use, and these fine monochrome porcelains played important roles in imperial rites at the summer solstice and as court wares within Beijing's Forbidden City. The project's aim has been to understand more fully the technologies used to make imperial yellow porcelains, which were significant ceramics in the history and culture of imperial China.

This paper concerns the porcelain body material, particularly the nature and use of Jingdezhen's two prime body materials — porcelain stone (cishi) and kaolin (gaoling). The 12 samples studied span four centuries of imperial porcelain production and include a major change in kaolin usage at Jingdezhen in the early seventeenth century, when the proportions of kaolin used in fine porcelain bodies rose abruptly from some 20% to 50%. This study explores the natures of both prepared rocks and looks particularly at kaolin, about which some long-standing problems remain.

用原子吸收光谱法研究了16世纪初至20世纪初的12件中国宫廷黄瓷的坯体。黄铅釉是皇家专用的,这些精美的单色瓷器在夏至的皇家仪式和北京紫禁城的宫廷用品中发挥了重要作用。该项目的目的是更全面地了解用于制作帝王黄瓷的技术,帝王黄瓷是中国帝王历史和文化中重要的陶瓷。本文论述了瓷胎材料,特别是景德镇瓷石和高岭土两种胎体材料的性质和用途。所研究的12个样品跨越了四个世纪的皇家瓷器生产,其中包括17世纪初景德镇高岭土使用的重大变化,当时精细瓷体中高岭土的比例从大约20%突然上升到50%。这项研究探索了两种制备岩石的性质,并特别关注高岭土,这方面仍然存在一些长期存在的问题。
{"title":"An AAS study of Chinese imperial yellow porcelain bodies and their place in the history of Jingdezhen's porcelain development","authors":"Nigel Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.09.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aia.2021.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The bodies of 12 examples of imperial yellow Chinese porcelain dating from the early sixteenth century to the early twentieth century have been studied by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The yellow lead glaze was reserved for imperial use, and these fine monochrome porcelains played important roles in imperial rites at the summer solstice and as court wares within Beijing's Forbidden City. The project's aim has been to understand more fully the technologies used to make imperial yellow porcelains, which were significant ceramics in the history and culture of imperial China.</p><p>This paper concerns the porcelain body material, particularly the nature and use of Jingdezhen's two prime body materials — porcelain stone (<em>cishi</em>) and kaolin (<em>gaoling</em>). The 12 samples studied span four centuries of imperial porcelain production and include a major change in kaolin usage at Jingdezhen in the early seventeenth century, when the proportions of kaolin used in fine porcelain bodies rose abruptly from some 20% to 50%. This study explores the natures of both prepared rocks and looks particularly at kaolin, about which some long-standing problems remain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 49-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667136021000066/pdfft?md5=c4ba4992dae7de3239da6a4d2d948aae&pid=1-s2.0-S2667136021000066-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72293341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Invention of cast iron smelting in early China: Archaeological survey and numerical simulation 中国早期铸铁冶炼的发明:考古调查和数值模拟
Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.001
Wei Qian , Xing Huang

The earliest cast iron in China dates to the 8th century BC and pre-dates the earliest European evidence by about two millennia. The invention of cast iron smelting is closely related to the pre-existing and contemporary technologies of casting bronze and firing ceramics as well as the social and political context of early 1st millennium BC China. A series of early iron smelting furnaces were surveyed, excavated, and scientifically analysed. However, in order to understand how cast iron was initially produced, the evidence from one of the earliest production sites was digitally simulated. This modelling allowed different potential methods for the underlying production technology to be evaluated. The explanation for the invention of cast iron lies both in borrowing and developing of techniques found in other contemporary pyrotechnologies as well as a contemporary systemic philosophical approach.

中国最早的铸铁可以追溯到公元前8世纪,比欧洲最早的证据早了大约两千年。铸铁冶炼的发明与铸造青铜和烧制陶瓷的现有和当代技术以及公元前一千年早期中国的社会和政治背景密切相关。对一系列早期炼铁炉进行了调查、发掘和科学分析。然而,为了了解铸铁最初是如何生产的,对来自最早生产地点之一的证据进行了数字模拟。该模型允许对基础生产技术的不同潜在方法进行评估。对铸铁发明的解释既在于借鉴和发展其他当代高温技术中的技术,也在于当代系统的哲学方法。
{"title":"Invention of cast iron smelting in early China: Archaeological survey and numerical simulation","authors":"Wei Qian ,&nbsp;Xing Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The earliest cast iron in China dates to the 8th century BC and pre-dates the earliest European evidence by about two millennia. The invention of cast iron smelting is closely related to the pre-existing and contemporary technologies of casting bronze and firing ceramics as well as the social and political context of early 1st millennium BC China. A series of early iron smelting furnaces were surveyed, excavated, and scientifically analysed. However, in order to understand how cast iron was initially produced, the evidence from one of the earliest production sites was digitally simulated. This modelling allowed different potential methods for the underlying production technology to be evaluated. The explanation for the invention of cast iron lies both in borrowing and developing of techniques found in other contemporary pyrotechnologies as well as a contemporary systemic philosophical approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 4-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72293344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Chinese mirrors from the burials of the nomads of Eastern Europe of the second half of the 1st millennium BC-first centuries AD: Typology, chronology, distribution and technology of manufacture 公元前1千年下半叶-公元1世纪东欧游牧民族墓葬中的中国镜子:类型学、年代、分布和制造技术
Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.07.001
Mikhail Treister , Irina Ravich

The article is devoted to the Chinese mirrors found in the burials of the nomads of Asian Sarmatia. The typology and chronology of mirrors is presented, the earliest of which dates back to the period of the Warring States, but most of them, dating back to the 1st century BC – 2nd century AD. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st century BC – the first half of the 1st century AD the number of Chinese items in Asiatic Sarmatia is increasing. They are represented, among others, by two mirrors of the Western Han type, which come from the Lower Volga and Don regions; they are not known in the South Urals. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st– the first half of the 2nd century AD the Chinese mirrors are much more common. As before, they are not known in the Urals, but they are also represented in the Kuban and Lower Volga, and especially in the Lower Don region. In the burials of the late Sarmatian period of the late 2nd – middle / second half of the 3rd century AD Chinese mirrors are relatively abundant in the Urals, where the mapping of finds allows us to distinguish two local groups (1 – South Urals: Lebedevka and burial grounds in the Ilek river basin; 2 - South Bashkiria, interfluve of the Sakmara and the Urals rivers, and the Trans-Urals), while further to the west – in the Lower Volga and Don regions, they generally ceased to fall, only two mirrors are known outside the South Urals – in Trans-Kuban and Central Ciscaucasia. The issue of deliberate damage to mirrors is specially considered.

Is it possible to consider the Chinese bronze mirrors as trade items? If we assume that they belonged to the items of trade along the Silk Road, then two conclusions following from the dating of the finds should be taken into consideration. Firstly, these mirrors were not distributed to the ancient centers of the North Pontic area and further to the territory of the Roman provinces. Thus, the way of the mirrors ended in the steppe. Moreover, starting from the second half of the 2nd century AD (late Sarmatian culture) Chinese mirrors cease to fall to the west of the Urals – their finds are unknown neither in the Lower Volga region, nor on the Don. This means that the connection between the distribution of the Chinese mirrors and the functioning of the northern branch of the Silk Road is unlikely.

这篇文章专门介绍在亚洲萨尔马提亚游牧民族的墓葬中发现的中国镜子。介绍了镜子的类型和年代,其中最早的可以追溯到战国时期,但大多数可以追溯到公元前1世纪至公元2世纪。在公元前1世纪下半叶至公元1世纪上半叶的建筑群中,亚洲萨尔马提亚的中国物品数量不断增加。其中,有两个来自伏尔加河下游和顿河地区的西汉式镜子;它们在南乌拉尔地区并不为人所知。在公元1世纪下半叶至2世纪上半叶的建筑群中,中国镜子更为常见。和以前一样,他们在乌拉尔不为人所知,但在库班和下伏尔加河地区,特别是在下顿河地区,他们也有代表。在公元2世纪晚期至3世纪中下半叶萨尔马时期的墓葬中,乌拉尔地区的中国镜子相对丰富,通过对这些发现的映射,我们可以区分出两个地方群体(1 -南乌拉尔:列别德夫卡和伊力克河流域的墓葬地;2 -南巴什基里亚,萨克马拉河和乌拉尔河的交汇处,以及外乌拉尔河),而在更远的西部-在伏尔加河下游和顿河地区,它们基本上停止了下降,只有两个镜子在南乌拉尔以外-在库班河和中高加索。特别考虑了故意损坏镜子的问题。中国的铜镜可以考虑作为贸易项目吗?如果我们假设它们属于丝绸之路沿线的贸易物品,那么从这些发现的年代得出的两个结论应该考虑进去。首先,这些镜子并没有分布到北本蒂克地区的古代中心,也没有分布到罗马行省的领土上。因此,镜子的道路在草原上结束了。此外,从公元2世纪下半叶(萨尔马西亚文化晚期)开始,中国的镜子就不再落在乌拉尔山脉以西了——它们的发现既不在伏尔加河下游地区,也不在顿河地区。这意味着中国镜子的分布与丝绸之路北部分支的运作之间的联系是不太可能的。
{"title":"Chinese mirrors from the burials of the nomads of Eastern Europe of the second half of the 1st millennium BC-first centuries AD: Typology, chronology, distribution and technology of manufacture","authors":"Mikhail Treister ,&nbsp;Irina Ravich","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article is devoted to the Chinese mirrors found in the burials of the nomads of Asian Sarmatia. The typology and chronology of mirrors is presented, the earliest of which dates back to the period of the Warring States, but most of them, dating back to the 1st century BC – 2nd century AD. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st century BC – the first half of the 1st century AD the number of Chinese items in Asiatic Sarmatia is increasing. They are represented, among others, by two mirrors of the Western Han type, which come from the Lower Volga and Don regions; they are not known in the South Urals. In the complexes of the second half of the 1st– the first half of the 2nd century AD the Chinese mirrors are much more common. As before, they are not known in the Urals, but they are also represented in the Kuban and Lower Volga, and especially in the Lower Don region. In the burials of the late Sarmatian period of the late 2nd – middle / second half of the 3rd century AD Chinese mirrors are relatively abundant in the Urals, where the mapping of finds allows us to distinguish two local groups (1 – South Urals: Lebedevka and burial grounds in the Ilek river basin; 2 - South Bashkiria, interfluve of the Sakmara and the Urals rivers, and the Trans-Urals), while further to the west – in the Lower Volga and Don regions, they generally ceased to fall, only two mirrors are known outside the South Urals – in Trans-Kuban and Central Ciscaucasia. The issue of deliberate damage to mirrors is specially considered.</p><p>Is it possible to consider the Chinese bronze mirrors as trade items? If we assume that they belonged to the items of trade along the Silk Road, then two conclusions following from the dating of the finds should be taken into consideration. Firstly, these mirrors were not distributed to the ancient centers of the North Pontic area and further to the territory of the Roman provinces. Thus, the way of the mirrors ended in the steppe. Moreover, starting from the second half of the 2<sup>nd</sup> century AD (late Sarmatian culture) Chinese mirrors cease to fall to the west of the Urals – their finds are unknown neither in the Lower Volga region, nor on the Don. This means that the connection between the distribution of the Chinese mirrors and the functioning of the northern branch of the Silk Road is unlikely.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 24-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667136021000054/pdfft?md5=dffc38c82c8692dc89e64abf42a88fc1&pid=1-s2.0-S2667136021000054-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75967025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The anthropology of technology and a new paradigm for archaeometallurgical research? 技术人类学和考古冶金研究的新范式?
Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.08.001
B. Pfaffenberger
{"title":"The anthropology of technology and a new paradigm for archaeometallurgical research?","authors":"B. Pfaffenberger","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.08.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aia.2021.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83496280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
An AAS study of Chinese imperial yellow porcelain bodies and their place in the history of Jingdezhen's porcelain development 中国帝王黄瓷体及其在景德镇瓷器发展史上地位的原子吸收光谱研究
Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.09.002
N. Wood
{"title":"An AAS study of Chinese imperial yellow porcelain bodies and their place in the history of Jingdezhen's porcelain development","authors":"N. Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.09.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aia.2021.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78465676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
A journey of over 200 years: early studies on wootz ingots and new evidence from Konasamudram, India 200多年的旅程:印度Konasamudram对wootz锭的早期研究和新证据
Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.002
S. Jaikishan , Meghna Desai , Th. Rehren

Recent new evidence emerged from the crucible steel production site of Konasamudram, Telangana, India. A hoard of 60 crucible steel ingots from this site offers a unique opportunity to study details of the early large-scale production of this fabled material, beginning with a detailed documentation of the weights and sizes of 45 of them. Historically, Konasamudram has been an important pre-modern crucible steel manufacturing and trading centre in India, as reported by Persian and European travelogues, and may have been the source of many of the early ingots studied during the past 200 years. The aim of this work is to present a dimensional analysis of these ingots and interpret the data in the context of earlier studies, to address questions of consistency in manufacturing, standardization of weights and other physical attributes. The newly-discovered ingots show considerable uniformity in shape, size and weights, indicative of a single production event during the heydays of crucible steel making, while the ingots previously reported in the literature vary much more widely.

最近的新证据出现在印度特伦甘纳Konasamudram的坩埚钢生产现场。该遗址的60块坩埚钢锭为研究这种传说中材料的早期大规模生产细节提供了一个独特的机会,首先要详细记录其中45块的重量和尺寸。历史上,正如波斯和欧洲游记所报道的那样,Konasamudram一直是印度重要的前现代坩埚钢制造和贸易中心,并且可能是过去200年中研究的许多早期钢锭的来源。这项工作的目的是对这些铸锭进行尺寸分析,并在早期研究的背景下解释数据,以解决制造的一致性、重量标准化和其他物理属性的问题。新发现的钢锭在形状、尺寸和重量上表现出相当大的均匀性,这表明在坩埚炼钢的鼎盛时期发生了一次单一的生产事件,而文献中先前报道的钢锭变化要大得多。
{"title":"A journey of over 200 years: early studies on wootz ingots and new evidence from Konasamudram, India","authors":"S. Jaikishan ,&nbsp;Meghna Desai ,&nbsp;Th. Rehren","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent new evidence emerged from the crucible steel production site of Konasamudram, Telangana, India. A hoard of 60 crucible steel ingots from this site offers a unique opportunity to study details of the early large-scale production of this fabled material, beginning with a detailed documentation of the weights and sizes of 45 of them. Historically, Konasamudram has been an important pre-modern crucible steel manufacturing and trading centre in India, as reported by Persian and European travelogues, and may have been the source of many of the early ingots studied during the past 200 years. The aim of this work is to present a dimensional analysis of these ingots and interpret the data in the context of earlier studies, to address questions of consistency in manufacturing, standardization of weights and other physical attributes. The newly-discovered ingots show considerable uniformity in shape, size and weights, indicative of a single production event during the heydays of crucible steel making, while the ingots previously reported in the literature vary much more widely.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aia.2021.04.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72293343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Soil, Hands, and Heads: An Ethnoarchaeological Study on Local Preconditions of Pottery Production in the Wei River Valley (Northern China) 土、手、头:渭河流域陶器生产地方前提的民族考古研究
Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.aia.2020.10.002
Anke Hein , Wa Ye , Liping Yang

This study combines an analysis of archaeological remains, geographic background, and ethnoarchaeological research to gain insights into preconditions and processes of pottery making in northern China during the Yangshao period (5000–3000 BCE). Previous research on Neolithic ceramics from this region focused on typochronology while ethnoarchaeological research has largely been limited to southern China, where geology, geomorphology, and thus resource availability are entirely different. In this study, for the first time we connect ethnographic research in northern China with an analysis of local archaeological ceramics and raw material sources to gain insight into patterns of raw material choice, ceramic production and distribution, and their connection with geographic preconditions. In this fashion, we are able to show that potters, both past and present, systematically sought out suitable raw material and worked close to abundant water and clay resources and major routes of distribution. Standardization is shown to be a problematic concept as ceramic measurements may vary even in large-scale specialized production, but clay recipes and procedures may be standardized. It also becomes clear that in recent times, migrating or travelling potters are responsible for the spread of ceramic production techniques and types. Similar processes may have taken place in the past as well.

本研究结合了考古遗迹分析、地理背景和民族考古研究,以深入了解仰韶时期(公元前5000-3000年)中国北方陶器制作的前提条件和过程。先前对该地区新石器时代陶瓷的研究主要集中在年代学上,而民族考古研究在很大程度上仅限于中国南方,那里的地质、地貌和资源的可用性完全不同。在这项研究中,我们首次将中国北方的民族志研究与当地考古陶瓷和原材料来源的分析联系起来,以深入了解原材料选择、陶瓷生产和分布的模式,以及它们与地理前提条件的联系。通过这种方式,我们能够展示过去和现在的陶工系统地寻找合适的原料,并在丰富的水和粘土资源以及主要分销路线附近工作。标准化被证明是一个有问题的概念,因为即使在大规模的专业化生产中,陶瓷的测量也可能有所不同,但粘土的配方和程序可以标准化。同样清楚的是,在近代,迁徙或旅行的陶工对陶瓷生产技术和类型的传播负有责任。类似的过程在过去也可能发生过。
{"title":"Soil, Hands, and Heads: An Ethnoarchaeological Study on Local Preconditions of Pottery Production in the Wei River Valley (Northern China)","authors":"Anke Hein ,&nbsp;Wa Ye ,&nbsp;Liping Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.aia.2020.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.aia.2020.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study combines an analysis of archaeological remains, geographic background, and ethnoarchaeological research to gain insights into preconditions and processes of pottery making in northern China during the Yangshao period (5000–3000 BCE). Previous research on Neolithic ceramics from this region focused on typochronology while ethnoarchaeological research has largely been limited to southern China, where geology, geomorphology, and thus resource availability are entirely different. In this study, for the first time we connect ethnographic research in northern China with an analysis of local archaeological ceramics and raw material sources to gain insight into patterns of raw material choice, ceramic production and distribution, and their connection with geographic preconditions. In this fashion, we are able to show that potters, both past and present, systematically sought out suitable raw material and worked close to abundant water and clay resources and major routes of distribution. Standardization is shown to be a problematic concept as ceramic measurements may vary even in large-scale specialized production, but clay recipes and procedures may be standardized. It also becomes clear that in recent times, migrating or travelling potters are responsible for the spread of ceramic production techniques and types. Similar processes may have taken place in the past as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 51-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aia.2020.10.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76604946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
A Welcome Message from the Managing Editor 总编辑的欢迎辞
Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2667-1360(20)30012-1
{"title":"A Welcome Message from the Managing Editor","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2667-1360(20)30012-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2667-1360(20)30012-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100038,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeomaterials","volume":"1 1","pages":"Page iv"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2667-1360(20)30012-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77000427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Advances in Archaeomaterials
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1