Agricultural Administration and Extension最新文献

From colonial times to independence, Marketing Boards were established primarily for marketing exportable agricultural commodities produced in Nigeria on behalf of the producers. This role, though greatly mutilated by government in search of other interests, was expanded in the 1970s to take care of non-export agricultural commodities. In less than a decade after this expansion, the Boards are being completely scrapped to pave way for the ‘free play’ of market forces in the marketing of agricultural commodities both internally and externally.

The focus of this paper is to examine' the problems and prospects of agricultural marketing in Nigeria in the absence of the institutional arrangement provided by the Marketing Boards. A critical examination of the Export Promotion Council will be made in respect of export crops. A critical analysis of the marketing of crops for domestic use will also be undertaken. The policy implications arising from the analysis will be presented.

The purpose of a topical Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) is to answer specific questions on a subject and it does so by employing the usual RRA techniques of secondary data review, semi-structured interviewing, direct observation and workshop formation. An investigation of the prevailing low sugarcane yields in Fiji, was used to design a general structure for combining these techniques in the process of topical RRA. It also aimed to develop models (diagrammatic representations) which could be produced within this structure of techniques, in the planning and implementation of future topical RRAs. The working framework aims to provide practical guidelines for its practitioners and, by helping formalise the composition of the topical RRA, to strengthen its identity.

In Part I the conclusions were drawn that the potential of a certain area for agricultural production is, to a certain degree, the result of investments in technology development; that historic and economic factors have led to a comparative disadvantage of agricultural systems in the developing countries; and that the collective agricultural production potentials of the developing countries have not been assessed properly. As a result of differences in investments for technology development, differences in development opportunities have emerged.

This part explores some important aspects of development intervention strategies, looks at the national agricultural policies of developing countries as well as of international development agencies and presents the concept opportunity gaps as an alternative to the frequently used concept of yield gaps. Some approaches to agricultural development that may contribute to bridging the opportunity gaps are discussed: the systems approach; the use of indigenous knowledge; development of agro-ecological practices and the bottom-up approach. Included is a checklist for the analysis of opportunity gaps that could be used by planners of development interventions who want to narrow these gaps.

Since the end of the nineteenth century the funding and control of agricultural research and development (R&D) has usually been assumed to be a State responsibility. The contention is that the State's share of agriculture's R & D costs is excessive and its control of R&D management is unsatisfactory. It is suggested that producer associations should be responsible for R&D on tradable agricultural commodities which are capable of generating private profit. The State should retain responsibility for R&D on agricultural resources and for legislative purposes, both of which can only generate social benefit. The political advantages of commodity responsibility for R&D are considered to be reduced dependence on State funds which now have higher priorities, greater relevance of R&D to producers' needs and depoliticisation of an economic activity without loss of its social benefits. Structurally, the advantages of commodity controlled R&D are claimed to be a reduction in institutional size and in centralised bureaucracy. This would permit more rapid response to changes in R&D requirements and the setting of unequivocal goals, which improve motivation and productivity. The managerial advantages of commodity controlled R&D include release from the equity principle inherent in bureaucracies which inhibits paying for performance; ‘closeness to the customer’ which improves the relevance of R&D projects; and the ability to use change to maintain personal and organisational effectiveness. Perhaps most important of all managerial advantages is the opportunity to use a specialised and integrated extension service to promote the profitability of producers.

The potential level of agricultural production is generally considered to be determined by physical factors such as quality of the soil, quality and availability of water and the prevailing climate.

This paper develops the influence of the available technology as another factor explaining production levels and influencing the assessment of production potentials.

Resource allocation for agricultural development is frequently based on expected (short term) returns and therefore the assessment of agricultural production potentials for a certain region is an important issue for planners in agricultural development.

In financial terms, developing regions are far less supported by agricultural research and extension than the western countries.

As a result of various factors, agricultural technology as it has been developed over the years, turns out to be biased by its western origin. Scientists have for long perceived agriculture in tropical areas with a western and male bias. Economic and political dependency as well as comparative disadvantaged positions at the international markets have led to suboptimal agricultural development and underutilization and underdevelopment of inherent production potentials in many tropical regions.

This paper makes a plea to search for complementary technologies in order to create new development opportunities. In Part II alternative development intervention strategies will be examined which could lead to a narrowing of the opportunity gaps.

Grievances articulated by small farmers in Djibouti highlight some major problems of institutional performance of the Ministry of Agriculture. Macroeconomic policies and divisions between competing departments within the Ministry mitigate against agricultural growth. Administrative reforms are proposed intended to unify policy-making, financial, personnel and monitoring functions throughout the Ministry. A post of Secretary General is to be created, supported by two technical units, to whom all Heads of Departments will report. Improved management performance will, it is hoped, provide solutions to the bottlenecks plaguing agricultural development and encourage greater government commitment to the sector.