Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-15DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90129-8
Erasmus D. Monu
The need to develop an effective strategy of technology transfer to peasants has been increasingly emphasized due to the fact that access to and use of appropriate technology is seen as one of the important factors in increasing food production among the peasants of the Third World. This paper describes the use of Indigenous Specialists as agents of technology transfer by the International Institute of Rural Reconstruction in the Philippines (IIRR). The lessons generated from this experience are discussed to point out the implications for technology transfer strategies.
{"title":"Indigenous specialists in agriculture: The IIRR experience","authors":"Erasmus D. Monu","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90129-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90129-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The need to develop an effective strategy of technology transfer to peasants has been increasingly emphasized due to the fact that access to and use of appropriate technology is seen as one of the important factors in increasing food production among the peasants of the Third World. This paper describes the use of Indigenous Specialists as agents of technology transfer by the International Institute of Rural Reconstruction in the Philippines (IIRR). The lessons generated from this experience are discussed to point out the implications for technology transfer strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"29 3","pages":"Pages 221-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90129-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87273992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-15DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90125-0
Jennifer A. McCracken
The purpose of a topical Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) is to answer specific questions on a subject and it does so by employing the usual RRA techniques of secondary data review, semi-structured interviewing, direct observation and workshop formation. An investigation of the prevailing low sugarcane yields in Fiji, was used to design a general structure for combining these techniques in the process of topical RRA. It also aimed to develop models (diagrammatic representations) which could be produced within this structure of techniques, in the planning and implementation of future topical RRAs. The working framework aims to provide practical guidelines for its practitioners and, by helping formalise the composition of the topical RRA, to strengthen its identity.
{"title":"A working framework for rapid rural appraisal: Lessons from a Fiji experience","authors":"Jennifer A. McCracken","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90125-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90125-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of a topical Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) is to answer specific questions on a subject and it does so by employing the usual RRA techniques of secondary data review, semi-structured interviewing, direct observation and workshop formation. An investigation of the prevailing low sugarcane yields in Fiji, was used to design a general structure for combining these techniques in the process of topical RRA. It also aimed to develop models (diagrammatic representations) which could be produced within this structure of techniques, in the planning and implementation of future topical RRAs. The working framework aims to provide practical guidelines for its practitioners and, by helping formalise the composition of the topical RRA, to strengthen its identity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"29 3","pages":"Pages 163-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90125-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91139116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-17DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2
Bertus Haverkort
In Part I the conclusions were drawn that the potential of a certain area for agricultural production is, to a certain degree, the result of investments in technology development; that historic and economic factors have led to a comparative disadvantage of agricultural systems in the developing countries; and that the collective agricultural production potentials of the developing countries have not been assessed properly. As a result of differences in investments for technology development, differences in development opportunities have emerged.
This part explores some important aspects of development intervention strategies, looks at the national agricultural policies of developing countries as well as of international development agencies and presents the concept opportunity gaps as an alternative to the frequently used concept of yield gaps. Some approaches to agricultural development that may contribute to bridging the opportunity gaps are discussed: the systems approach; the use of indigenous knowledge; development of agro-ecological practices and the bottom-up approach. Included is a checklist for the analysis of opportunity gaps that could be used by planners of development interventions who want to narrow these gaps.
{"title":"Agricultural production potentials Part II: Development support policies and strategies— from yield gaps to opportunity gaps","authors":"Bertus Haverkort","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Part I the conclusions were drawn that the potential of a certain area for agricultural production is, to a certain degree, the result of investments in technology development; that historic and economic factors have led to a comparative disadvantage of agricultural systems in the developing countries; and that the collective agricultural production potentials of the developing countries have not been assessed properly. As a result of differences in investments for technology development, differences in development opportunities have emerged.</p><p>This part explores some important aspects of development intervention strategies, looks at the national agricultural policies of developing countries as well as of international development agencies and presents the concept <em>opportunity gaps</em> as an alternative to the frequently used concept of <em>yield gaps</em>. Some approaches to agricultural development that may contribute to bridging the opportunity gaps are discussed: the systems approach; the use of indigenous knowledge; development of agro-ecological practices and the bottom-up approach. Included is a checklist for the analysis of opportunity gaps that could be used by planners of development interventions who want to narrow these gaps.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"30 3","pages":"Pages 187-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90054-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83305097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-17DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90063-3
Aja Okorie
{"title":"Rural banking in Nigeria: Lessons from other developing countries","authors":"Aja Okorie","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90063-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90063-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"28 2","pages":"147-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90063-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72283021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-16DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X
P.A. Donovan, M.G. Lynas
Since the end of the nineteenth century the funding and control of agricultural research and development (R&D) has usually been assumed to be a State responsibility. The contention is that the State's share of agriculture's R & D costs is excessive and its control of R&D management is unsatisfactory. It is suggested that producer associations should be responsible for R&D on tradable agricultural commodities which are capable of generating private profit. The State should retain responsibility for R&D on agricultural resources and for legislative purposes, both of which can only generate social benefit. The political advantages of commodity responsibility for R&D are considered to be reduced dependence on State funds which now have higher priorities, greater relevance of R&D to producers' needs and depoliticisation of an economic activity without loss of its social benefits. Structurally, the advantages of commodity controlled R&D are claimed to be a reduction in institutional size and in centralised bureaucracy. This would permit more rapid response to changes in R&D requirements and the setting of unequivocal goals, which improve motivation and productivity. The managerial advantages of commodity controlled R&D include release from the equity principle inherent in bureaucracies which inhibits paying for performance; ‘closeness to the customer’ which improves the relevance of R&D projects; and the ability to use change to maintain personal and organisational effectiveness. Perhaps most important of all managerial advantages is the opportunity to use a specialised and integrated extension service to promote the profitability of producers.
{"title":"The political, structural and managerial advantages of commodity-controlled agricultural research and development in South Africa","authors":"P.A. Donovan, M.G. Lynas","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the end of the nineteenth century the funding and control of agricultural research and development (R&D) has usually been assumed to be a State responsibility. The contention is that the State's share of agriculture's R & D costs is excessive and its control of R&D management is unsatisfactory. It is suggested that producer associations should be responsible for R&D on tradable agricultural commodities which are capable of generating private profit. The State should retain responsibility for R&D on agricultural resources and for legislative purposes, both of which can only generate social benefit. The political advantages of commodity responsibility for R&D are considered to be reduced dependence on State funds which now have higher priorities, greater relevance of R&D to producers' needs and depoliticisation of an economic activity without loss of its social benefits. Structurally, the advantages of commodity controlled R&D are claimed to be a reduction in institutional size and in centralised bureaucracy. This would permit more rapid response to changes in R&D requirements and the setting of unequivocal goals, which improve motivation and productivity. The managerial advantages of commodity controlled R&D include release from the equity principle inherent in bureaucracies which inhibits paying for performance; ‘closeness to the customer’ which improves the relevance of R&D projects; and the ability to use change to maintain personal and organisational effectiveness. Perhaps most important of all managerial advantages is the opportunity to use a specialised and integrated extension service to promote the profitability of producers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 19-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90027-X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81377194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-15DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90121-3
Bertus Haverkort
The potential level of agricultural production is generally considered to be determined by physical factors such as quality of the soil, quality and availability of water and the prevailing climate.
This paper develops the influence of the available technology as another factor explaining production levels and influencing the assessment of production potentials.
Resource allocation for agricultural development is frequently based on expected (short term) returns and therefore the assessment of agricultural production potentials for a certain region is an important issue for planners in agricultural development.
In financial terms, developing regions are far less supported by agricultural research and extension than the western countries.
As a result of various factors, agricultural technology as it has been developed over the years, turns out to be biased by its western origin. Scientists have for long perceived agriculture in tropical areas with a western and male bias. Economic and political dependency as well as comparative disadvantaged positions at the international markets have led to suboptimal agricultural development and underutilization and underdevelopment of inherent production potentials in many tropical regions.
This paper makes a plea to search for complementary technologies in order to create new development opportunities. In Part II alternative development intervention strategies will be examined which could lead to a narrowing of the opportunity gaps.
{"title":"Agricultural production potentials part I: Inherent, or the result of investments in technology development? The influence of technology gaps on the assessment of production potentials in developing countries","authors":"Bertus Haverkort","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90121-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90121-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The potential level of agricultural production is generally considered to be determined by physical factors such as quality of the soil, quality and availability of water and the prevailing climate.</p><p>This paper develops the influence of the <em>available technology</em> as another factor explaining production levels and influencing the assessment of production potentials.</p><p>Resource allocation for agricultural development is frequently based on expected (short term) returns and therefore the assessment of agricultural production potentials for a certain region is an important issue for planners in agricultural development.</p><p>In financial terms, developing regions are far less supported by agricultural research and extension than the western countries.</p><p>As a result of various factors, agricultural technology as it has been developed over the years, turns out to be biased by its western origin. Scientists have for long perceived agriculture in tropical areas with a western and male bias. Economic and political dependency as well as comparative disadvantaged positions at the international markets have led to suboptimal agricultural development and underutilization and underdevelopment of inherent production potentials in many tropical regions.</p><p>This paper makes a plea to search for complementary technologies in order to create new development opportunities. In Part II alternative development intervention strategies will be examined which could lead to a narrowing of the opportunity gaps.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"30 2","pages":"Pages 127-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90121-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84131775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90038-4
K. Nwanze
{"title":"National agricultural research programmes in Sahelian countries of West Africa: Problems and recommendations☆","authors":"K. Nwanze","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90038-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90038-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"292 1-2 1","pages":"227-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78490479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-15DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90034-7
J. Mullen
Grievances articulated by small farmers in Djibouti highlight some major problems of institutional performance of the Ministry of Agriculture. Macroeconomic policies and divisions between competing departments within the Ministry mitigate against agricultural growth. Administrative reforms are proposed intended to unify policy-making, financial, personnel and monitoring functions throughout the Ministry. A post of Secretary General is to be created, supported by two technical units, to whom all Heads of Departments will report. Improved management performance will, it is hoped, provide solutions to the bottlenecks plaguing agricultural development and encourage greater government commitment to the sector.
{"title":"Institution strengthening in rural development: The case of Djibouti","authors":"J. Mullen","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90034-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90034-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Grievances articulated by small farmers in Djibouti highlight some major problems of institutional performance of the Ministry of Agriculture. Macroeconomic policies and divisions between competing departments within the Ministry mitigate against agricultural growth. Administrative reforms are proposed intended to unify policy-making, financial, personnel and monitoring functions throughout the Ministry. A post of Secretary General is to be created, supported by two technical units, to whom all Heads of Departments will report. Improved management performance will, it is hoped, provide solutions to the bottlenecks plaguing agricultural development and encourage greater government commitment to the sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"28 3","pages":"Pages 181-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90034-7","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87458764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1988-01-01Epub Date: 2004-12-15DOI: 10.1016/0269-7475(88)90005-0
S.R. Wragg
{"title":"Year Book of Agricultural Co-operation 1986","authors":"S.R. Wragg","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90005-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90005-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":"28 4","pages":"Pages 315-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90005-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90613068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}