Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100100
Joseph A. Attard, Emily Siviter, Alice Millard, Eyad Issa, Giuseppe Garcea, Ashley Dennison, John Isherwood
Hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) cancers present a major challenge due to their late presentation, limited treatment options, and high mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool in revolutionising cancer care, offering potential advances in early detection, and treatment planning. However, real-world implementation of AI remains limited by ethical, technical, and systemic challenges. This narrative review explores the evolving landscape of AI in HPB oncology, with a focus on ethical integration, healthcare equity, and clinical applicability. Key issues discussed include algorithmic bias, informed consent, model explainability, and disparities in access to data and AI-driven tools. Promising innovations such as federated learning and large language models are explored for their potential to decentralise model training and enhance multidisciplinary workflows. The review also highlights the integration of AI into surgical navigation systems and intraoperative decision-making, as well as its application to omics data analysis for biomarker discovery. Crucially, it underscores the need for transparent and interpretable systems, the need for prospective validation in diverse populations, and the risk of clinician de-skilling. As AI technologies evolve, their safe and equitable integration into HPB oncology will require robust governance, regulatory foresight, and sustained investment in clinician education and infrastructure. This review concludes that, while AI shows potential in transforming HPB cancer care, its ethical and inclusive implementation will ultimately determine its clinical impact.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer: Ethics, equity, and real-world integration","authors":"Joseph A. Attard, Emily Siviter, Alice Millard, Eyad Issa, Giuseppe Garcea, Ashley Dennison, John Isherwood","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100100","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100100","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) cancers present a major challenge due to their late presentation, limited treatment options, and high mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool in revolutionising cancer care, offering potential advances in early detection, and treatment planning. However, real-world implementation of AI remains limited by ethical, technical, and systemic challenges. This narrative review explores the evolving landscape of AI in HPB oncology, with a focus on ethical integration, healthcare equity, and clinical applicability. Key issues discussed include algorithmic bias, informed consent, model explainability, and disparities in access to data and AI-driven tools. Promising innovations such as federated learning and large language models are explored for their potential to decentralise model training and enhance multidisciplinary workflows. The review also highlights the integration of AI into surgical navigation systems and intraoperative decision-making, as well as its application to omics data analysis for biomarker discovery. Crucially, it underscores the need for transparent and interpretable systems, the need for prospective validation in diverse populations, and the risk of clinician de-skilling. As AI technologies evolve, their safe and equitable integration into HPB oncology will require robust governance, regulatory foresight, and sustained investment in clinician education and infrastructure. This review concludes that, while AI shows potential in transforming HPB cancer care, its ethical and inclusive implementation will ultimately determine its clinical impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145435363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100099
Rebecca O'Keeffe , Sarah Massey
Aims
The aim of this study was to gain a consensus for best practice of follow up of patients following limb salvage surgery with a Juvenile tumour Systems (JTS) extendible implant to benchmark and guide consistent care.
Methods
A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted by paediatric sarcoma specialists. They identified 8 areas of follow up care that required consensus agreement. Statements were based around leg length measurement, long-leg X-Rays, joint range of movement, procedure within the lengthening appointment, physiotherapy, shoe raises, training, frequency of appointments. A pre-determined threshold of >70 % for consensus, with a threshold of >60 % being considered as ‘points to consider’.
Results
Sixteen professionals and manufacturers consented to be part of the consensus. A total of 63 statements were generated for the initial questionnaire, at the end of which 9 statements reached consensus. The remaining 54 statements were discussed and refined to 31 for the second questionnaire. Following two rounds of questionnaires and web conferences a total of 29 statements reached consensus.
Conclusion
Paediatric sarcoma specialists have reached expert consensus to provide a framework for consistent follow up management of JTS implants, many of which could be generalised to other non-invasive growing implants. We would recommend that clinicians use these statements to ensure follow-up care is consistent.
{"title":"The management of Juvenile Tumour Systems implants following limb salvage surgery for bone sarcoma: A British consensus informing best practice and consistent care","authors":"Rebecca O'Keeffe , Sarah Massey","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100099","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100099","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The aim of this study was to gain a consensus for best practice of follow up of patients following limb salvage surgery with a Juvenile tumour Systems (JTS) extendible implant to benchmark and guide consistent care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted by paediatric sarcoma specialists. They identified 8 areas of follow up care that required consensus agreement. Statements were based around leg length measurement, long-leg X-Rays, joint range of movement, procedure within the lengthening appointment, physiotherapy, shoe raises, training, frequency of appointments. A pre-determined threshold of >70 % for consensus, with a threshold of >60 % being considered as ‘points to consider’.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen professionals and manufacturers consented to be part of the consensus. A total of 63 statements were generated for the initial questionnaire, at the end of which 9 statements reached consensus. The remaining 54 statements were discussed and refined to 31 for the second questionnaire. Following two rounds of questionnaires and web conferences a total of 29 statements reached consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Paediatric sarcoma specialists have reached expert consensus to provide a framework for consistent follow up management of JTS implants, many of which could be generalised to other non-invasive growing implants. We would recommend that clinicians use these statements to ensure follow-up care is consistent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145435364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100101
Byung Choi, Amr Mousa, Tyler Longbone, Lavandan Jegatheeswaran, Mohammed Elsiddig, Vishal Patel, Ekambaram Babu, Arunmoy Chakravorty
Metastatic breast cancer has long considered an incurable disease, however a subset coined oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) has challenged this assumption. OMBC represents a stable entity that presents as an intermediary state between locoregional and widespread disease where metastasised cells are limited to suitable sites potentially amenable to treatment. However, the treatment for OMBC is not standardised and a major limitation is diagnostic difficulty as it relies only on imaging findings. In the United Kingdom, a case by case discussion of treatment is made due to lack of guidance or framework. The role of primary surgical excision of the breast tumour in OMBC has been scrutinised with varying outcomes to date. This review evaluates the role of primary surgical excision and future directions in the field of OMBC management. Most studies to date have been retrospective in nature, given the diagnostic challenges of OMBC and studies to date have failed to show conclusive evidence regarding surgery to the primary tumour. Some favourable factors seem to be hormone receptor positivity and bone pre-dominant metastasis, however there is a need for better understanding in the distinct biology of OMBC to characterise and determine the value of surgery to the primary tumour as well as adjuvant oncological treatments.
{"title":"Role of primary tumour surgery in the management of oligometastatic breast cancer","authors":"Byung Choi, Amr Mousa, Tyler Longbone, Lavandan Jegatheeswaran, Mohammed Elsiddig, Vishal Patel, Ekambaram Babu, Arunmoy Chakravorty","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100101","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100101","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metastatic breast cancer has long considered an incurable disease, however a subset coined oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) has challenged this assumption. OMBC represents a stable entity that presents as an intermediary state between locoregional and widespread disease where metastasised cells are limited to suitable sites potentially amenable to treatment. However, the treatment for OMBC is not standardised and a major limitation is diagnostic difficulty as it relies only on imaging findings. In the United Kingdom, a case by case discussion of treatment is made due to lack of guidance or framework. The role of primary surgical excision of the breast tumour in OMBC has been scrutinised with varying outcomes to date. This review evaluates the role of primary surgical excision and future directions in the field of OMBC management. Most studies to date have been retrospective in nature, given the diagnostic challenges of OMBC and studies to date have failed to show conclusive evidence regarding surgery to the primary tumour. Some favourable factors seem to be hormone receptor positivity and bone pre-dominant metastasis, however there is a need for better understanding in the distinct biology of OMBC to characterise and determine the value of surgery to the primary tumour as well as adjuvant oncological treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100095
Omer A. Idris , Abdulaziz Shebrain , Ali Jawad , Sabrina C. Pacione , Delour Haj , Hanin Bzizi , Yaqub O. Ahmedfiqi , Bahar Saadaie Jahromi , Nicholas Deleon , Tiantian Zhang , Amanda Hunt , Ramona Meraz Lewis , Diana Westgate
Melanoma, a malignancy of melanocytes, has increased globally, posing significant treatment challenges. BRAF mutations, particularly V600E and V600K variants, occur in approximately 40–60 % of cutaneous melanomas and activate the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Although BRAF and MEK inhibitors have improved response rates and survival, acquired resistance—due to genetic alterations, activation of alternative pathways, and phenotypic changes—remains a major hurdle.
Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has emerged as a promising option to overcome resistance to targeted therapies. This review explores the rationale for using pembrolizumab post-resistance, emphasizing its ability to enhance immune recognition through the immunogenic effects of prior targeted therapies and its synergistic potential when combined with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Clinical evidence from KEYNOTE trials and real-world studies demonstrates pembrolizumab's efficacy as monotherapy and in combination regimens, leading to improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma. Mechanistic insights from preclinical studies suggest that targeted therapies modulate the tumor microenvironment and enhance antigen presentation, augmenting the effectiveness of pembrolizumab. Novel biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are examined for their potential to predict treatment response and guide personalized therapy. Challenges related to increased toxicity in combination therapies, economic impact, and patient heterogeneity are discussed, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and management strategies. Future directions include optimizing treatment sequencing, exploring novel therapeutic combinations, and advancing personalized medicine through integrative genomic and immunologic data. This review underscores the pivotal role of pembrolizumab in managing BRAF-mutant melanoma and emphasizes the importance of integrated therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Breaking barriers: Pembrolizumab's role in overcoming targeted therapy resistance in BRAF-mutant melanoma","authors":"Omer A. Idris , Abdulaziz Shebrain , Ali Jawad , Sabrina C. Pacione , Delour Haj , Hanin Bzizi , Yaqub O. Ahmedfiqi , Bahar Saadaie Jahromi , Nicholas Deleon , Tiantian Zhang , Amanda Hunt , Ramona Meraz Lewis , Diana Westgate","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100095","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100095","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Melanoma, a malignancy of melanocytes, has increased globally, posing significant treatment challenges. BRAF mutations, particularly V600E and V600K variants, occur in approximately 40–60 % of cutaneous melanomas and activate the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Although BRAF and MEK inhibitors have improved response rates and survival, acquired resistance—due to genetic alterations, activation of alternative pathways, and phenotypic changes—remains a major hurdle.</div><div>Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has emerged as a promising option to overcome resistance to targeted therapies. This review explores the rationale for using pembrolizumab post-resistance, emphasizing its ability to enhance immune recognition through the immunogenic effects of prior targeted therapies and its synergistic potential when combined with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Clinical evidence from KEYNOTE trials and real-world studies demonstrates pembrolizumab's efficacy as monotherapy and in combination regimens, leading to improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma. Mechanistic insights from preclinical studies suggest that targeted therapies modulate the tumor microenvironment and enhance antigen presentation, augmenting the effectiveness of pembrolizumab. Novel biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are examined for their potential to predict treatment response and guide personalized therapy. Challenges related to increased toxicity in combination therapies, economic impact, and patient heterogeneity are discussed, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and management strategies. Future directions include optimizing treatment sequencing, exploring novel therapeutic combinations, and advancing personalized medicine through integrative genomic and immunologic data. This review underscores the pivotal role of pembrolizumab in managing BRAF-mutant melanoma and emphasizes the importance of integrated therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144988235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100093
Valentinus Valdimarsson, Ingvar Syk, Victor Verwaal
Background
Some patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) only undergo explorative laparotomy (open/close procedure) due to extensive tumor spread or challenges in achieving complete cytoreduction (CC0). This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes and overall survival in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) who only undergo open/closed laparotomy.
Methods
All patients scheduled for CRS and HIPEC in Malmö, Sweden, between 2015 and 2023, who only underwent open/close laparotomy were included. Patients without malignant diagnoses were excluded. Clinical, survival, and complication data were analyzed.
Results
A total of 28 patients underwent open/closed laparotomy only. Before the laparotomy, 15 (54 %) patients had undergone diagnostic laparoscopy with a median PCI score of 13.0 (IQR 10.0–19.0). During the laparotomy, the median PCI score was found to be 29.0 (IQR 25.5–33.0). The most common reason for not proceeding with CRS and HIPEC surgery was a high PCI score (61 %). Three patients (11 %) experienced serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3b), and one patient died during the first postoperative day. After the explorative laparotomy, twenty-one (78 %) patients received palliative chemotherapy (median survival of 13.4 months), whereas six received none (median survival of 3.5 months), with missing data from one patient.
Conclusion
Patients diagnosed with PSM who undergo only exploratory laparotomy (open/close) have a very poor prognosis. Exploratory laparotomy poses a significant risk of serious postoperative complications, as well as a lengthy hospital stay. Improved diagnostic tools are urgently needed to help identify the right patients for CRS and HIPEC treatment.
{"title":"Outcome of patients scheduled for CRS and HIPEC yet only undergoing explorative laparotomy","authors":"Valentinus Valdimarsson, Ingvar Syk, Victor Verwaal","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100093","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100093","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Some patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) only undergo explorative laparotomy (open/close procedure) due to extensive tumor spread or challenges in achieving complete cytoreduction (CC0). This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes and overall survival in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) who only undergo open/closed laparotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients scheduled for CRS and HIPEC in Malmö, Sweden, between 2015 and 2023, who only underwent open/close laparotomy were included. Patients without malignant diagnoses were excluded. Clinical, survival, and complication data were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 patients underwent open/closed laparotomy only. Before the laparotomy, 15 (54 %) patients had undergone diagnostic laparoscopy with a median PCI score of 13.0 (IQR 10.0–19.0). During the laparotomy, the median PCI score was found to be 29.0 (IQR 25.5–33.0). The most common reason for not proceeding with CRS and HIPEC surgery was a high PCI score (61 %). Three patients (11 %) experienced serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3b), and one patient died during the first postoperative day. After the explorative laparotomy, twenty-one (78 %) patients received palliative chemotherapy (median survival of 13.4 months), whereas six received none (median survival of 3.5 months), with missing data from one patient.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients diagnosed with PSM who undergo only exploratory laparotomy (open/close) have a very poor prognosis. Exploratory laparotomy poses a significant risk of serious postoperative complications, as well as a lengthy hospital stay. Improved diagnostic tools are urgently needed to help identify the right patients for CRS and HIPEC treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145018766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100092
Rickvir S. Sidhu , Arrane Selvamogan
{"title":"Evaluating the quality and readability of AI-generated ophthalmic surgery education: A four model comparison","authors":"Rickvir S. Sidhu , Arrane Selvamogan","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100092","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100092","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145104480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100097
Guanming Chen , Jesus C. Fabregas , Zhigang Xie , Ilyas Sahin , Girish Mishra , Jiamin Hu , Rachel E. Liu-Galvin , Young-Rock Hong
Background
Few real-world studies have characterized the utilization pattern and overall survival (OS) benefits associated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) among patients diagnosed with colon cancer.
Patients and methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we identified adult patients diagnosed with stages II-IV colon cancer from 2015 to 2020 using the US National Cancer Database. Patients were grouped based on treatment modality and sequence: NAT and those treated by upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy (ADT). We examined utilization pattern of NAT by patients’ sociodemographic, medical, and facility characteristics. We then used Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models to compare OS across cancer stages between two groups.
Results
Of the 116,905 patients who met inclusion criteria, 8110 (6.9 %) received NAT. Overall, patients underwent NAT were generally younger (age ≤64 years), privately insured, diagnosed with stage IV colon cancer, and with liver metastasis. Receipt of NAT was associated with significantly improved OS among patients with stage IV colon cancer after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95 % CI: 0.76–0.83, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis results showed that NAT was associated with better OS compared to those received ADT regardless of age, liver metastasis status, comorbidity score, and KRAS mutation status. For patients with stages II or III colon cancer, NAT was not associated with improved OS.
Conclusion
Neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with improved OS among patients with stage IV colon cancer. Future investigations are needed to understand the role of NAT in locally advanced colon cancer.
背景:很少有现实世界的研究描述了结肠癌患者新辅助治疗(NAT)的使用模式和总生存期(OS)获益。患者和方法在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用美国国家癌症数据库,确定了2015年至2020年诊断为II-IV期结肠癌的成年患者。患者根据治疗方式和顺序进行分组:NAT和术前手术后辅助治疗(ADT)。我们根据患者的社会人口学、医学和设施特征检查了NAT的使用模式。然后,我们使用Kaplan Meier方法和Cox比例风险模型来比较两组癌症分期的OS。结果在符合纳入标准的116,905例患者中,8110例(6.9%)接受了NAT治疗。总体而言,接受NAT治疗的患者通常较年轻(年龄≤64岁),有私人保险,诊断为IV期结肠癌,并有肝转移。调整协变量后,接受NAT治疗与IV期结肠癌患者的OS显著改善相关(风险比0.79;95% CI: 0.76-0.83, p < 0.001)。亚组分析结果显示,无论年龄、肝转移情况、合并症评分和KRAS突变状态如何,与接受ADT的患者相比,NAT与更好的OS相关。对于II期或III期结肠癌患者,NAT与改善OS无关。结论新辅助治疗可显著改善IV期结肠癌患者的OS。需要进一步的研究来了解NAT在局部晚期结肠癌中的作用。
{"title":"Neoadjuvant therapy for patients with advanced colon cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB)","authors":"Guanming Chen , Jesus C. Fabregas , Zhigang Xie , Ilyas Sahin , Girish Mishra , Jiamin Hu , Rachel E. Liu-Galvin , Young-Rock Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100097","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100097","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Few real-world studies have characterized the utilization pattern and overall survival (OS) benefits associated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) among patients diagnosed with colon cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>In this retrospective cohort study, we identified adult patients diagnosed with stages II-IV colon cancer from 2015 to 2020 using the US National Cancer Database. Patients were grouped based on treatment modality and sequence: NAT and those treated by upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy (ADT). We examined utilization pattern of NAT by patients’ sociodemographic, medical, and facility characteristics. We then used Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models to compare OS across cancer stages between two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 116,905 patients who met inclusion criteria, 8110 (6.9 %) received NAT. Overall, patients underwent NAT were generally younger (age ≤64 years), privately insured, diagnosed with stage IV colon cancer, and with liver metastasis. Receipt of NAT was associated with significantly improved OS among patients with stage IV colon cancer after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95 % CI: 0.76–0.83, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Subgroup analysis results showed that NAT was associated with better OS compared to those received ADT regardless of age, liver metastasis status, comorbidity score, and KRAS mutation status. For patients with stages II or III colon cancer, NAT was not associated with improved OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with improved OS among patients with stage IV colon cancer. Future investigations are needed to understand the role of NAT in locally advanced colon cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145104478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100094
Rickvir S. Sidhu , Arrane Selvamogan
{"title":"Assessing the quality and readability of AI chatbot responses to frequently asked questions about basal cell carcinoma","authors":"Rickvir S. Sidhu , Arrane Selvamogan","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100094","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100094","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145104479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100096
Amine Majdoubi , Anass El Aachi , Mohammed El Hammouti , Haïtam Aabalou , Ayoub Kharkhach , Tariq Bouhout , Badr Serji
Introduction
Anastomotic fistulas remain one of the most feared complications following rectal surgery, particularly after Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). They compromise prognosis, prolong hospitalization, and increase costs due to the additional interventions they necessitate.
Aims
To identify predictive factors for the occurrence of anastomotic fistulas, with the goal of personalizing and optimizing surgical management—particularly to guide decisions regarding the use of defunctioning stomas.
Materials and methods
We conducted a retrospective observational study on 78 patients who underwent TME with low rectal anastomosis for rectal adenocarcinoma at Hassan II University Hospital in Oujda, between December 2017 and May 2024.
Results
Of the 78 patients, 21 developed anastomotic fistulas, yielding an incidence rate of 26.9 %. Late-onset cases were predominant (16 cases, 76.19 %) compared to early-onset cases (five cases, 23.81 %). In univariate analysis, diabetes (p = 0.002), intraoperative incidents (p = 0.014) - particularly blood loss exceeding 150 cc (p = 0.001) - and smoking (p = 0.005) were significant risk factors for fistula development. In multivariate analysis, diabetes (OR = 10.87; p = 0.003) and intraoperative blood loss >150 ml (OR = 7.38; p = 0.030) emerged as independent predictors of fistula development. Active smoking showed a borderline association (OR = 6.46; p = 0.056), suggesting a potential but not statistically confirmed impact on anastomotic fistula. These findings are consistent with the existing literature. In contrast, other factors commonly reported in the literature, such as male sex (p = 0.530), ASA score (p = 0.612), anemia (p = 0.324), and preoperative (p = 0.781) and postoperative albumin levels (p = 0.119), did not show a significant association in our study.
Discussion and conclusion
While the identified risk factors are relevant, they alone are insufficient to warrant major modifications in our surgical strategy, particularly regarding the decision to perform a defunctioning stoma. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings.
吻合口瘘是直肠手术后最可怕的并发症之一,特别是在全肠系膜切除术(TME)后。它们损害预后,延长住院时间,并由于需要额外干预而增加费用。目的确定吻合口瘘发生的预测因素,以实现个性化和优化手术治疗的目标,特别是指导关于使用功能障碍造口的决定。材料与方法我们对2017年12月至2024年5月在Oujda Hassan II大学医院行TME低位直肠吻合治疗直肠腺癌的78例患者进行了回顾性观察研究。结果78例患者中发生吻合口瘘21例,发生率26.9%。晚发病例16例(76.19%),早发病例5例(23.81%)。在单因素分析中,糖尿病(p = 0.002)、术中事件(p = 0.014)——特别是失血量超过150cc (p = 0.001)——和吸烟(p = 0.005)是瘘管发生的重要危险因素。在多因素分析中,糖尿病(OR = 10.87; p = 0.003)和术中出血量>;150 ml (OR = 7.38; p = 0.030)成为瘘发生的独立预测因素。积极吸烟呈边缘相关性(OR = 6.46; p = 0.056),提示对吻合口瘘有潜在的影响,但未得到统计学证实。这些发现与现有文献一致。相比之下,文献中常见的其他因素,如男性(p = 0.530)、ASA评分(p = 0.612)、贫血(p = 0.324)、术前(p = 0.781)和术后白蛋白水平(p = 0.119)等,在我们的研究中并没有显示出显著的相关性。讨论和结论虽然确定的危险因素是相关的,但它们本身不足以保证我们对手术策略进行重大修改,特别是在决定进行功能缺损时。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
{"title":"Risk factors for anastomotic fistula after total mesorectal excision: A monocentric retrospective study of 78 patients","authors":"Amine Majdoubi , Anass El Aachi , Mohammed El Hammouti , Haïtam Aabalou , Ayoub Kharkhach , Tariq Bouhout , Badr Serji","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100096","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100096","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Anastomotic fistulas remain one of the most feared complications following rectal surgery, particularly after Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). They compromise prognosis, prolong hospitalization, and increase costs due to the additional interventions they necessitate.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To identify predictive factors for the occurrence of anastomotic fistulas, with the goal of personalizing and optimizing surgical management—particularly to guide decisions regarding the use of defunctioning stomas.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective observational study on 78 patients who underwent TME with low rectal anastomosis for rectal adenocarcinoma at Hassan II University Hospital in Oujda, between December 2017 and May 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 78 patients, 21 developed anastomotic fistulas, yielding an incidence rate of 26.9 %. Late-onset cases were predominant (16 cases, 76.19 %) compared to early-onset cases (five cases, 23.81 %). In univariate analysis, diabetes (p = 0.002), intraoperative incidents (p = 0.014) - particularly blood loss exceeding 150 cc (p = 0.001) - and smoking (p = 0.005) were significant risk factors for fistula development. In multivariate analysis, diabetes (OR = 10.87; p = 0.003) and intraoperative blood loss >150 ml (OR = 7.38; p = 0.030) emerged as independent predictors of fistula development. Active smoking showed a borderline association (OR = 6.46; p = 0.056), suggesting a potential but not statistically confirmed impact on anastomotic fistula. These findings are consistent with the existing literature. In contrast, other factors commonly reported in the literature, such as male sex (p = 0.530), ASA score (p = 0.612), anemia (p = 0.324), and preoperative (p = 0.781) and postoperative albumin levels (p = 0.119), did not show a significant association in our study.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>While the identified risk factors are relevant, they alone are insufficient to warrant major modifications in our surgical strategy, particularly regarding the decision to perform a defunctioning stoma. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144932187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1016/j.cson.2025.100091
Zhekun Huang , Songbin Lin , Peiwen Zhou , Yang Lv , Guodong He , Ye Wei , Jianmin Xu , Wentao Tang
Background
Anastomotic leakage are common and serious complications after surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers; a prophylactic stoma is thought to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and alleviate its serious complications. However, it also comes with numerous risks. This study will investigate the value of prophylactic stomas in robot-assisted radical surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers.
Methods
We included 670 patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical resection at two hospitals within Fudan University from June 2016 to October 2022 (77 underwent prophylactic stoma and 593 did not have prophylactic stoma). The clinical data of the patients were collected and analyzed using a propensity score matching method that matched the groups at a 1:1 ratio based on sex, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, distance of the lower edge of the tumor from the anal verge, maximum diameter of the tumor, and preoperative incomplete obstruction.
Results
Patients in the prophylactic stoma group had a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage than the non-stoma group. There were no significant differences in the overall postoperative complication, unplanned readmission, or 30-day postoperative reoperation rates between the groups; however, the prophylactic stoma group had a lower number of postoperative hospital days and lower average hospital costs. Preoperative bowel obstruction was an independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leakage in the prophylactic stoma group.
Conclusions
Prophylactic stomas based on a robotic platform are beneficial for some high-risk patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer.
{"title":"Prophylactic stoma in robotic radical surgery for low-to-intermediate rectal cancer","authors":"Zhekun Huang , Songbin Lin , Peiwen Zhou , Yang Lv , Guodong He , Ye Wei , Jianmin Xu , Wentao Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100091","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100091","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anastomotic leakage are common and serious complications after surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers; a prophylactic stoma is thought to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and alleviate its serious complications. However, it also comes with numerous risks. This study will investigate the value of prophylactic stomas in robot-assisted radical surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 670 patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical resection at two hospitals within Fudan University from June 2016 to October 2022 (77 underwent prophylactic stoma and 593 did not have prophylactic stoma). The clinical data of the patients were collected and analyzed using a propensity score matching method that matched the groups at a 1:1 ratio based on sex, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, distance of the lower edge of the tumor from the anal verge, maximum diameter of the tumor, and preoperative incomplete obstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the prophylactic stoma group had a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage than the non-stoma group. There were no significant differences in the overall postoperative complication, unplanned readmission, or 30-day postoperative reoperation rates between the groups; however, the prophylactic stoma group had a lower number of postoperative hospital days and lower average hospital costs. Preoperative bowel obstruction was an independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leakage in the prophylactic stoma group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Prophylactic stomas based on a robotic platform are beneficial for some high-risk patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144913137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}