Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into education necessitates teachers acquiring competencies aligned with technological advancements, especially within vocational contexts. This study aimed to adapt and validate a concise self-report instrument, the AI-integrated Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AI-TPACK) scale, grounded in the TPACK framework, to measure vocational teachers' competencies in integrating AI into instructional practices. A total of 460 pre-service and in-service vocational teachers from Indonesia participated. The adapted instrument encompasses seven constructs, including AI Pedagogical Knowledge, AI Content Knowledge, AI Technological Knowledge, and their intersections, culminating in a comprehensive AI-TPACK construct. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed strong model fit, and convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and composite reliability met acceptable thresholds. Structural equation modeling revealed significant predictive relationships among constructs, while measurement invariance tests supported its suitability across pre-service and in-service teachers. These findings affirm the adapted AI-TPACK scale as a reliable and valid tool for assessing AI-integrated pedagogical competencies specifically within vocational education contexts.
{"title":"Measuring Teachers' competencies for AI integration: Development and validation of the AI-TPACK in vocational education","authors":"Andri Setiyawan , Soeharto Soeharto , Tommy Tanu Wijaya , Lilla Korenova , Zsolt Lavicza","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100319","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100319","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into education necessitates teachers acquiring competencies aligned with technological advancements, especially within vocational contexts. This study aimed to adapt and validate a concise self-report instrument, the AI-integrated Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AI-TPACK) scale, grounded in the TPACK framework, to measure vocational teachers' competencies in integrating AI into instructional practices. A total of 460 pre-service and in-service vocational teachers from Indonesia participated. The adapted instrument encompasses seven constructs, including AI Pedagogical Knowledge, AI Content Knowledge, AI Technological Knowledge, and their intersections, culminating in a comprehensive AI-TPACK construct. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed strong model fit, and convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and composite reliability met acceptable thresholds. Structural equation modeling revealed significant predictive relationships among constructs, while measurement invariance tests supported its suitability across pre-service and in-service teachers. These findings affirm the adapted AI-TPACK scale as a reliable and valid tool for assessing AI-integrated pedagogical competencies specifically within vocational education contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100319"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145683704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100283
Reem Mahdi Al-Bogami , Nsreen Abdulhamid Alahmadi
Oral reading fluency (ORF) is a critical skill for young English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. Researchers have explored various traditional and digital interventions to enhance EFL learners’ ORF. However, studies integrating cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) tools, in EFL remain limited. This mixed-methods quasi-experimental study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Reading Progress, an AI-based tool on the Microsoft Teams platform (MTRP), in improving the ORF, regarding accuracy, speed, and prosody, of third-grade EFL learners in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, it investigated the perspectives of the experimental group’s parents regarding the tool’s usage. Participants included 56 third-grade EFL learners (boys and girls) from a public elementary school in Jeddah, divided into two groups. The experimental group (n = 28) utilised MTRP as an intervention, while the control group (n = 28) engaged in traditional paper-based assignments. Pre- and post-tests and semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather data. The quantitative data were analysed using SPSS, while the qualitative data were transcribed, translated, and then analysed through NVivo. The results indicated that the experimental group, achieved significantly higher scores in ORF skills after utilizing MTRP compared to the control group. The experimental group’s parents reported positive feedback, expressing satisfaction with the tool’s impact on their children’s ORF. However, the children were initially challenged due to time constraints and lengthy texts. Nevertheless, they believed that consistent practice and high goal-setting enabled them to overcome obstacles. The findings are expected to provide valuable insights for EFL educators, policymakers, and researchers.
{"title":"Effects of an AI-based reading progress tool on third-grade EFL learners’ oral reading fluency","authors":"Reem Mahdi Al-Bogami , Nsreen Abdulhamid Alahmadi","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100283","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100283","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oral reading fluency (ORF) is a critical skill for young English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. Researchers have explored various traditional and digital interventions to enhance EFL learners’ ORF. However, studies integrating cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) tools, in EFL remain limited. This mixed-methods quasi-experimental study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Reading Progress, an AI-based tool on the Microsoft Teams platform (MTRP), in improving the ORF, regarding accuracy, speed, and prosody, of third-grade EFL learners in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, it investigated the perspectives of the experimental group’s parents regarding the tool’s usage. Participants included 56 third-grade EFL learners (boys and girls) from a public elementary school in Jeddah, divided into two groups. The experimental group (<em>n</em> = 28) utilised MTRP as an intervention, while the control group (<em>n</em> = 28) engaged in traditional paper-based assignments. Pre- and post-tests and semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather data. The quantitative data were analysed using SPSS, while the qualitative data were transcribed, translated, and then analysed through NVivo. The results indicated that the experimental group, achieved significantly higher scores in ORF skills after utilizing MTRP compared to the control group. The experimental group’s parents reported positive feedback, expressing satisfaction with the tool’s impact on their children’s ORF. However, the children were initially challenged due to time constraints and lengthy texts. Nevertheless, they believed that consistent practice and high goal-setting enabled them to overcome obstacles. The findings are expected to provide valuable insights for EFL educators, policymakers, and researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100283"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145094748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100312
Xing Sun , Zi-Xiang Xu , Ling-Chen Meng , Ding-Nan Shi
Traditional public speaking education often suffers from limited learner engagement, delayed formative feedback, and a lack of interactive and adaptive training environments. This study proposes an AI-driven gamified speech learning framework (AI-GSLF), which combines real-time feedback technologies with motivational game design principles to address these issues. Based on this framework, a serious game—Strongest Speech Streamer—was developed using the Godot engine. The system integrates automatic speech recognition, sentiment analysis, and a novel speech rate detection algorithm to provide immediate feedback, helping learners adjust pacing, reduce anxiety, and enhance fluency during practice. A true experimental design was employed, involving 57 primary school students randomly assigned to either the experimental group using the gamified system or a control group following traditional methods over one month. Quantitative results showed that the experimental group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in motivation, confidence, speech accuracy, and delivery fluency. To our knowledge, few prior studies have integrated real-time AI feedback with systematic gamification for primary-level formal speech training. Findings support the potential of AI-GSLF as an effective, scalable approach to enhancing student performance and engagement in public speaking education.
{"title":"AI-driven gamified speech training for primary students: framework and evaluation","authors":"Xing Sun , Zi-Xiang Xu , Ling-Chen Meng , Ding-Nan Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100312","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100312","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional public speaking education often suffers from limited learner engagement, delayed formative feedback, and a lack of interactive and adaptive training environments. This study proposes an AI-driven gamified speech learning framework (AI-GSLF), which combines real-time feedback technologies with motivational game design principles to address these issues. Based on this framework, a serious game—<em>Strongest Speech Streamer</em>—was developed using the Godot engine. The system integrates automatic speech recognition, sentiment analysis, and a novel speech rate detection algorithm to provide immediate feedback, helping learners adjust pacing, reduce anxiety, and enhance fluency during practice. A true experimental design was employed, involving 57 primary school students randomly assigned to either the experimental group using the gamified system or a control group following traditional methods over one month. Quantitative results showed that the experimental group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in motivation, confidence, speech accuracy, and delivery fluency. To our knowledge, few prior studies have integrated real-time AI feedback with systematic gamification for primary-level formal speech training. Findings support the potential of AI-GSLF as an effective, scalable approach to enhancing student performance and engagement in public speaking education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100312"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145571442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-08DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100307
Jeffrey Radloff , Ibrahim H. Yeter , Thomas K.F. Chiu
As artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly implemented in educational contexts, elementary teacher preparation programs must equip preservice teachers (PSTs) with knowledge and skills related to AI. AI presents novel challenges for teachers while holding transformative potential for teaching and learning. Grounded in IntelligentTPACK, this study examines the perceptions of elementary (i.e., PK-6) PSTs regarding AI and its perceived classroom applications. Participants include 49 PSTs at a northeastern US teaching college enrolled in science methods and critical media literacy courses that explicitly and reflectively introduce AI applications and their uses. Data were collected through researcher-developed pre- and post-surveys, as well as open-ended Intelligent-TPACK reflections. Data were analyzed using thematic coding, with Intelligent-TPACK serving as the lens. Our analyses revealed that PSTs held mixed views and varied perceptions of AI's uses, as well as some uncertainty. Yet, most recognized the potential of AI for supporting differentiated learning, brainstorming, and the generation of teaching materials (I-PK). Trained as PK-6 ‘generalists,’ few PSTs expressed specific disciplinary connections (I-CK). Only half described concerns about AI biases and overreliance (Ethics), and the majority discussed AI as a tool (ITK). As such, PSTs demonstrated emerging Intelligent-TPACK, with a need for more attention to fostering content-specific uses and AI ethics. Findings support similar literature while providing novel PST perspectives, and as such, reveal discrete entry points for further Intelligent-TPACK consideration and research. Results further inform IntelligentTPACK explorations and underscore the role of teacher education in shaping PSTs’ ethical and effective use of AI in their future classrooms.
{"title":"Intelligent-TPACK in teacher education: Examining preservice elementary teachers’ emerging views about AI classroom use","authors":"Jeffrey Radloff , Ibrahim H. Yeter , Thomas K.F. Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100307","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100307","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly implemented in educational contexts, elementary teacher preparation programs must equip preservice teachers (PSTs) with knowledge and skills related to AI. AI presents novel challenges for teachers while holding transformative potential for teaching and learning. Grounded in IntelligentTPACK, this study examines the perceptions of elementary (i.e., PK-6) PSTs regarding AI and its perceived classroom applications. Participants include 49 PSTs at a northeastern US teaching college enrolled in science methods and critical media literacy courses that explicitly and reflectively introduce AI applications and their uses. Data were collected through researcher-developed pre- and post-surveys, as well as open-ended Intelligent-TPACK reflections. Data were analyzed using thematic coding, with Intelligent-TPACK serving as the lens. Our analyses revealed that PSTs held mixed views and varied perceptions of AI's uses, as well as some uncertainty. Yet, most recognized the potential of AI for supporting differentiated learning, brainstorming, and the generation of teaching materials (I-PK). Trained as PK-6 ‘generalists,’ few PSTs expressed specific disciplinary connections (I-CK). Only half described concerns about AI biases and overreliance (Ethics), and the majority discussed AI as a tool (ITK). As such, PSTs demonstrated emerging Intelligent-TPACK, with a need for more attention to fostering content-specific uses and AI ethics. Findings support similar literature while providing novel PST perspectives, and as such, reveal discrete entry points for further Intelligent-TPACK consideration and research. Results further inform IntelligentTPACK explorations and underscore the role of teacher education in shaping PSTs’ ethical and effective use of AI in their future classrooms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100307"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145571441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100301
John Lorenz Dela Cruz , Paulyn Joy Dela Cruz , Joyce Antonette Guadalupe , Jiabianca Macaraeg , Piolo Jose Montesa , Mark Paul Ramos , Rex P. Bringula , Kaoru Sumi
This study explored the patterns of mathematics problem-solving and synthetic facial expressions (SFEs) exhibited by a personal instructing agent named PIA. Toward this goal, 81 Grade 8 students participated in a three-day experiment where they were randomly assigned either to the facial (FG) or non-facial (NFG) group. The students’ interactions within the PIA were collected and stored as log files. The attributes extracted from the log files included types of mathematics problems solved (i.e., schema), status of the mathematics problems solved, difficulty levels of mathematics problems solved, and SFEs exhibited by the PIA. Lag sequential analysis (LSA) disclosed that there were similarities and differences in the sequence of math problem-solving behaviors among students. The Apriori algorithm revealed that struggling students tend to solve problems successfully, irrespective of their sex; however, struggling female students tend to solve more problems successfully than their male counterparts. Nonetheless, regardless of their levels of math competency and the version of software used, all students solved problems they were comfortable with and always started with easier problems, gradually progressing. Limitations and future research were also discussed.
{"title":"Patterns of mathematics problem solving and synthetic facial expressions in a personal instructing agent","authors":"John Lorenz Dela Cruz , Paulyn Joy Dela Cruz , Joyce Antonette Guadalupe , Jiabianca Macaraeg , Piolo Jose Montesa , Mark Paul Ramos , Rex P. Bringula , Kaoru Sumi","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100301","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100301","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored the patterns of mathematics problem-solving and synthetic facial expressions (SFEs) exhibited by a personal instructing agent named PIA. Toward this goal, 81 Grade 8 students participated in a three-day experiment where they were randomly assigned either to the facial (FG) or non-facial (NFG) group. The students’ interactions within the PIA were collected and stored as log files. The attributes extracted from the log files included types of mathematics problems solved (i.e., schema), status of the mathematics problems solved, difficulty levels of mathematics problems solved, and SFEs exhibited by the PIA. Lag sequential analysis (LSA) disclosed that there were similarities and differences in the sequence of math problem-solving behaviors among students. The Apriori algorithm revealed that struggling students tend to solve problems successfully, irrespective of their sex; however, struggling female students tend to solve more problems successfully than their male counterparts. Nonetheless, regardless of their levels of math competency and the version of software used, all students solved problems they were comfortable with and always started with easier problems, gradually progressing. Limitations and future research were also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100301"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145361066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-02DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100298
Rui Manuel Silva , Paulo Martins , Tânia Rocha
Background
Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often face significant challenges in traditional educational environments, including difficulties in social interaction, engagement, and adapting to standard learning methods. These barriers can hinder their academic and personal development, highlighting the need for more inclusive and adaptive educational solutions.
Objective
This study investigated whether immersive VR-based STEM learning environments can support the cognitive, social and behavioural development of pupils with ASD. We evaluated usability and accessibility needs, validated the artefact through expert consensus, and measured pre–post changes using established standardised instruments.
Methodology
The research followed the Design Science Research (DSR) approach within STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) to develop VR-based learning experiences adapted to the needs of students with ASD. The Delphi method involved experts in defining best practices and educational strategies, helping to ensure that the proposed solutions were appropriate and aligned with student characteristics. The study included a control and an experimental group, both composed of students with ASD and typically developing students, assessing the impact of VR on learning and socialisation.
Results
The findings suggest that VR-based learning environments may support improvements in cognitive, behavioural and social skills, although causal inference is limited by the small sample size and absence of randomisation.
Conclusions
This study provides preliminary evidence that VR-based learning environments may help address educational barriers for students with ASD by offering structured, engaging and adaptable environments that could support inclusion and development.
{"title":"Impact of virtual reality learning environments on skills development in students with ASD","authors":"Rui Manuel Silva , Paulo Martins , Tânia Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100298","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100298","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often face significant challenges in traditional educational environments, including difficulties in social interaction, engagement, and adapting to standard learning methods. These barriers can hinder their academic and personal development, highlighting the need for more inclusive and adaptive educational solutions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigated whether immersive VR-based STEM learning environments can support the cognitive, social and behavioural development of pupils with ASD. We evaluated usability and accessibility needs, validated the artefact through expert consensus, and measured pre–post changes using established standardised instruments.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The research followed the Design Science Research (DSR) approach within STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) to develop VR-based learning experiences adapted to the needs of students with ASD. The Delphi method involved experts in defining best practices and educational strategies, helping to ensure that the proposed solutions were appropriate and aligned with student characteristics. The study included a control and an experimental group, both composed of students with ASD and typically developing students, assessing the impact of VR on learning and socialisation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings suggest that VR-based learning environments may support improvements in cognitive, behavioural and social skills, although causal inference is limited by the small sample size and absence of randomisation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provides preliminary evidence that VR-based learning environments may help address educational barriers for students with ASD by offering structured, engaging and adaptable environments that could support inclusion and development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100298"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145264959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100314
Sabine Seufert, Philipp Hartmann, Lukas Spirgi
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) rapidly becomes a structural element of education, teacher preparation programs face urgent challenges in developing both pedagogical competence and ethical awareness among future educators. This exploratory study investigates how Swiss pre-service teachers in business education conceptualize, design, and evaluate GenAI-supported instruction through the lens of the Intelligent-TPACK framework, an expanded model integrating technological, pedagogical, content, and ethical knowledge. Twelve master-level pre-service teachers participated in a mixed-method study that combined self-report surveys, group-based instructional design artefacts, and AI-driven prompt analysis using OpenAI o3. Results show that participants reported high confidence in technological and pedagogical AI knowledge, but they exhibited weaker confidence and reliability in ethical knowledge, particularly regarding transparency and accountability. All chatbot designs address the "Active" rather than "Interactive" level of the ICAP hierarchy. The AI-based analysis further highlighted gaps in Socratic questioning and metacognitive prompting, underscoring limited opportunities for reflection and co-construction. These findings reveal a need to move beyond surface-level tool familiarity towards integrating ethical reflection and explicit design-in-action practices within teacher education. Ultimately, the study underscores the importance of cultivating pre-service teachers as co-designers of pedagogical experiences who are equipped to navigate both the technical and ethical complexities of AI-mediated classrooms.
{"title":"Fostering Intelligent-TPACK through AI-assistance: A multi-method study in pre-service teacher education","authors":"Sabine Seufert, Philipp Hartmann, Lukas Spirgi","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100314","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100314","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) rapidly becomes a structural element of education, teacher preparation programs face urgent challenges in developing both pedagogical competence and ethical awareness among future educators. This exploratory study investigates how Swiss pre-service teachers in business education conceptualize, design, and evaluate GenAI-supported instruction through the lens of the Intelligent-TPACK framework, an expanded model integrating technological, pedagogical, content, and ethical knowledge. Twelve master-level pre-service teachers participated in a mixed-method study that combined self-report surveys, group-based instructional design artefacts, and AI-driven prompt analysis using OpenAI o3. Results show that participants reported high confidence in technological and pedagogical AI knowledge, but they exhibited weaker confidence and reliability in ethical knowledge, particularly regarding transparency and accountability. All chatbot designs address the \"Active\" rather than \"Interactive\" level of the ICAP hierarchy. The AI-based analysis further highlighted gaps in Socratic questioning and metacognitive prompting, underscoring limited opportunities for reflection and co-construction. These findings reveal a need to move beyond surface-level tool familiarity towards integrating ethical reflection and explicit design-in-action practices within teacher education. Ultimately, the study underscores the importance of cultivating pre-service teachers as co-designers of pedagogical experiences who are equipped to navigate both the technical and ethical complexities of AI-mediated classrooms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100278
Peer-Benedikt Degen
The rise of AI in education presents both transformative opportunities and methodological challenges. This paper revisits Generalizability Theory (G-Theory) as a robust framework to assess the reliability and fairness of AI-driven tools across diverse educational contexts. It is argued that G-Theory’s variance decomposition logic is uniquely suited to disentangle the multifaceted sources of error introduced by evolving AI systems, user diversity, and complex learning environments. Through empirical use cases it is illustrated how G-Theory can support the design of equitable, scalable, and context-sensitive AI applications. We further A G-Theory Readiness Checklist to guide researchers in designing studies with AI as a methodological facet is proposed. Finally, conceptual, technical, ethical, pedagogical, and regulatory limitations and implications for study designs are highlighted. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.
{"title":"Revisiting generalizability theory in the age of artificial intelligence: Implications for empirical educational research","authors":"Peer-Benedikt Degen","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100278","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100278","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise of AI in education presents both transformative opportunities and methodological challenges. This paper revisits Generalizability Theory (G-Theory) as a robust framework to assess the reliability and fairness of AI-driven tools across diverse educational contexts. It is argued that G-Theory’s variance decomposition logic is uniquely suited to disentangle the multifaceted sources of error introduced by evolving AI systems, user diversity, and complex learning environments. Through empirical use cases it is illustrated how G-Theory can support the design of equitable, scalable, and context-sensitive AI applications. We further A G-Theory Readiness Checklist to guide researchers in designing studies with AI as a methodological facet is proposed. Finally, conceptual, technical, ethical, pedagogical, and regulatory limitations and implications for study designs are highlighted. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100278"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144763800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-29DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100317
Xiaolu Rui, Ismail Celik, Justin Edwards
As Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) transforms teaching and learning with accompanying technological, pedagogical, and ethical challenges, understanding pre-service teachers’ AI perceptions and ensuring their adequate preparation is crucial for effective AIEd implementation. While previous research has examined pre-service teachers’ AI competencies and perspectives using either quantitative or qualitative methods, a critical gap remains in understanding their specific needs for AI-based instructional tools and relevant training through an integrated theoretical lens. This mixed-methods study addresses this gap by investigating 49 pre-service teachers’ needs under the Intelligent-TPACK framework. Statistical and thematic analyses revealed pre-service teachers’ ambivalent attitudes toward AI-based tools and associated training. Participants expressed needs for technological, pedagogical, content, and ethical knowledge related to AI in education, along with concerns about AI-based tools. While individual requirements for AI-relevant knowledge varied, participants consistently demonstrated high demand for training specifically in AI ethics.
Overall, this study revealed pre-service teachers’ unpreparedness regarding AIEd, furtherly uncovering critical gaps between their knowledge demands and existing teacher training programs. The findings call for an integrated approach combining AI-technical expertise with hands-on pedagogical practices within teacher education programs. This research contributes to the field by validating the Intelligent TPACK framework and providing recommendations for educational program designers to create effective training for AI-based tools.
{"title":"Understanding pre-service teachers’ needs for integrating AI-based tools in instruction through intelligent TPACK framework","authors":"Xiaolu Rui, Ismail Celik, Justin Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100317","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100317","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) transforms teaching and learning with accompanying technological, pedagogical, and ethical challenges, understanding pre-service teachers’ AI perceptions and ensuring their adequate preparation is crucial for effective AIEd implementation. While previous research has examined pre-service teachers’ AI competencies and perspectives using either quantitative or qualitative methods, a critical gap remains in understanding their specific needs for AI-based instructional tools and relevant training through an integrated theoretical lens. This mixed-methods study addresses this gap by investigating 49 pre-service teachers’ needs under the Intelligent-TPACK framework. Statistical and thematic analyses revealed pre-service teachers’ ambivalent attitudes toward AI-based tools and associated training. Participants expressed needs for technological, pedagogical, content, and ethical knowledge related to AI in education, along with concerns about AI-based tools. While individual requirements for AI-relevant knowledge varied, participants consistently demonstrated high demand for training specifically in AI ethics.</div><div>Overall, this study revealed pre-service teachers’ unpreparedness regarding AIEd, furtherly uncovering critical gaps between their knowledge demands and existing teacher training programs. The findings call for an integrated approach combining AI-technical expertise with hands-on pedagogical practices within teacher education programs. This research contributes to the field by validating the Intelligent TPACK framework and providing recommendations for educational program designers to create effective training for AI-based tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100317"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145683699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100303
Johannes Huwer , Christoph Thyssen , Sebastian Becker-Genschow , Lena von Kotzebue , Alexander Finger , Erik Kremser , Sandra Berber , Mathea Brückner , Nikolai Maurer , Till Bruckermann , Monique Meier , Lars-Jochen Thoms
The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of digital technologies have transformed the education sector. Among these developments, the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT has had a considerable impact on teaching and learning practices. While the integration of AI into educational settings is becoming increasingly common, subject-specific analyses, especially in STEM education, are still lacking. This paper examines the specific challenges and potential of AI in the context of STEM education. It does so by exploring how AI has transformed scientific disciplines and how these changes impact teaching and learning. It highlights the necessity for educators to acquire specific competencies to effectively incorporate AI into their instructional practices. Building on existing frameworks such as DigCompEdu and the subject-specific DiKoLAN, the paper proposes an AI-focused framework: DiKoLAN AI. This framework aligns AI-related teacher competencies with instructional practice in science education. It also provides a structure for categorizing existing teacher training programs. The paper outlines the development of the DiKoLAN AI framework and its content consensus validation by a total of 64 experts through three iterative cycles. Its practical application is demonstrated through 20 case studies from different authors, which offer a practical approach for supporting teacher training and curriculum design in AI-integrated STEM education. The paper concludes with a discussion of opportunities, challenges and future research needs for teacher professionalization.
{"title":"Competencies for teaching with and about artificial intelligence in the natural sciences — DiKoLAN AI","authors":"Johannes Huwer , Christoph Thyssen , Sebastian Becker-Genschow , Lena von Kotzebue , Alexander Finger , Erik Kremser , Sandra Berber , Mathea Brückner , Nikolai Maurer , Till Bruckermann , Monique Meier , Lars-Jochen Thoms","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100303","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100303","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of digital technologies have transformed the education sector. Among these developments, the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT has had a considerable impact on teaching and learning practices. While the integration of AI into educational settings is becoming increasingly common, subject-specific analyses, especially in STEM education, are still lacking. This paper examines the specific challenges and potential of AI in the context of STEM education. It does so by exploring how AI has transformed scientific disciplines and how these changes impact teaching and learning. It highlights the necessity for educators to acquire specific competencies to effectively incorporate AI into their instructional practices. Building on existing frameworks such as DigCompEdu and the subject-specific DiKoLAN, the paper proposes an AI-focused framework: DiKoLAN AI. This framework aligns AI-related teacher competencies with instructional practice in science education. It also provides a structure for categorizing existing teacher training programs. The paper outlines the development of the DiKoLAN AI framework and its content consensus validation by a total of 64 experts through three iterative cycles. Its practical application is demonstrated through 20 case studies from different authors, which offer a practical approach for supporting teacher training and curriculum design in AI-integrated STEM education. The paper concludes with a discussion of opportunities, challenges and future research needs for teacher professionalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100303"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}