首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research最新文献

英文 中文
Cycling and cognition in middle-aged and older adults: A scoping review 中老年人骑车与认知:一项范围综述
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100092
Kathryn L. Walker , Adrienne Gaudreault , Stephanie A. Prince , Gary Goldfield , Vanessa Taler , Monica Taljaard , Meghan Winters , Elizabeth Kristjansson

Introduction

Cognitive decline with aging is a population health issue. Cycling may help maintain cognitive function and prevent cognitive decline in older adulthood. We conducted a scoping review to summarize and identify gaps in the literature examining cycling for transportation and/or recreation and their association with cognition in middle-aged and older adults.

Methods

Nine bibliographic databases were searched (inception-March 2024) to identify all articles that reported on cycling for transportation, leisure outdoors, or cycling indoors along a virtual bike path, and any cognitive outcome among adults ≥ 45 years of age. We summarized article findings and associations narratively.

Results

Searching identified 5171 citations, and 23 articles were included examining apparently healthy and clinical populations. Cycling interventions included virtual cycling indoors (randomized controlled trials=10, quasi-experimental=5), cycling outdoors for recreation (quasi-experimental=3, cross-sectional=1), any reason (cohort=1, cross-sectional=1), or transportation (simulation modelling=2). The most frequently examined cognitive outcome was executive function (n = 15), followed by memory (n = 9) and, global cognition (n = 9). Most articles (70 %) reported a statistically significant positive association between cycling and a cognitive outcome. Identified literature gaps include, a lack of sex- and gender-based analyses; robust study designs exploring cycling outdoors including for transportation; and literature examining additive cognitive benefits of cycling over other physical activity and transportation modes.

Conclusion

Cycling may help maintain or improve cognitive health during aging. Further high-quality research is needed to examine outdoor and transport cycling across all cognitive outcomes, the additional benefits of cycling over other physical activity and transportation modes, and whether gender differences exist. Cycling may help maintain or improve cognitive health during aging. Further high-quality research is needed to examine outdoor and transport cycling across all cognitive outcomes, the additional benefits of cycling over other physical activity and transportation modes, and whether gender differences exist.
老年认知能力下降是一个人口健康问题。骑自行车可能有助于维持认知功能,防止老年人的认知能力下降。我们进行了一项范围综述,以总结和确定文献中关于骑自行车作为交通和/或娱乐方式及其与中老年认知关系的空白。方法检索9个文献数据库(开始至2024年3月),以确定所有报道骑自行车作为交通工具、户外休闲或沿着虚拟自行车道在室内骑自行车的文章,以及≥ 45岁成年人的任何认知结果。我们以叙述性的方式总结了文章的发现和关联。结果检索得到5171条引用,其中23篇文章检查了明显健康的临床人群。骑行干预包括室内虚拟骑行(随机对照试验=10,准实验=5)、户外骑行娱乐(准实验=3,横断面=1)、任何原因(队列=1,横断面=1)或交通(模拟建模=2)。最常检查的认知结果是执行功能(n = 15),其次是记忆(n = 9)和整体认知(n = 9)。大多数文章(70 %)报道了骑车和认知结果之间有统计学意义的正相关。已确定的文献缺口包括:缺乏性别和基于性别的分析;稳健的研究设计探索户外骑自行车,包括交通;还有文献研究了骑自行车对认知的附加益处,而不是其他体育活动和交通方式。结论骑自行车有助于维持或改善老年人的认知健康。需要进一步的高质量研究来检查户外和交通自行车在所有认知结果中的作用,骑自行车相对于其他身体活动和交通方式的额外好处,以及性别差异是否存在。骑车可能有助于维持或改善老年人的认知健康。需要进一步的高质量研究来检查户外和交通自行车在所有认知结果中的作用,骑自行车相对于其他身体活动和交通方式的额外好处,以及性别差异是否存在。
{"title":"Cycling and cognition in middle-aged and older adults: A scoping review","authors":"Kathryn L. Walker ,&nbsp;Adrienne Gaudreault ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Prince ,&nbsp;Gary Goldfield ,&nbsp;Vanessa Taler ,&nbsp;Monica Taljaard ,&nbsp;Meghan Winters ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Kristjansson","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100092","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100092","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cognitive decline with aging is a population health issue. Cycling may help maintain cognitive function and prevent cognitive decline in older adulthood. We conducted a scoping review to summarize and identify gaps in the literature examining cycling for transportation and/or recreation and their association with cognition in middle-aged and older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine bibliographic databases were searched (inception-March 2024) to identify all articles that reported on cycling for transportation, leisure outdoors, or cycling indoors along a virtual bike path, and any cognitive outcome among adults ≥ 45 years of age. We summarized article findings and associations narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Searching identified 5171 citations, and 23 articles were included examining apparently healthy and clinical populations. Cycling interventions included virtual cycling indoors (randomized controlled trials=10, quasi-experimental=5), cycling outdoors for recreation (quasi-experimental=3, cross-sectional=1), any reason (cohort=1, cross-sectional=1), or transportation (simulation modelling=2). The most frequently examined cognitive outcome was executive function (n = 15), followed by memory (n = 9) and, global cognition (n = 9). Most articles (70 %) reported a statistically significant positive association between cycling and a cognitive outcome. Identified literature gaps include, a lack of sex- and gender-based analyses; robust study designs exploring cycling outdoors including for transportation; and literature examining additive cognitive benefits of cycling over other physical activity and transportation modes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cycling may help maintain or improve cognitive health during aging. Further high-quality research is needed to examine outdoor and transport cycling across all cognitive outcomes, the additional benefits of cycling over other physical activity and transportation modes, and whether gender differences exist. Cycling may help maintain or improve cognitive health during aging. Further high-quality research is needed to examine outdoor and transport cycling across all cognitive outcomes, the additional benefits of cycling over other physical activity and transportation modes, and whether gender differences exist.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modelling the impact of lower speed limits on residential streets for cyclist level of traffic stress and car travel time in Greater Melbourne 模拟大墨尔本居民区街道上较低的速度限制对骑自行车者交通压力水平和汽车旅行时间的影响
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100085
Afshin Jafari , Steve Pemberton , Sapan Tiwari , Tayebeh Saghapour , Nikhil Chand , Belen Zapata-Diomedi , Billie Giles-Corti
Reducing speed limits to create safer, lower-stress environments for cyclists is a widely proposed policy but often faces resistance due to concerns about increased travel times. This study evaluates these concerns by assessing Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) under existing speed limits (base scenario) and the effects of reducing residential street speed limits to 40 km/h and 30 km/h (alternative scenarios) on cycling LTS and car travel time.
LTS is a widely used measure of cycling stress, categorising road segments from LTS-1 (least stressful) to LTS-4 (most stressful). We assigned LTS values to all road segments in Greater Melbourne based on cycling infrastructure, road hierarchy, traffic volume, and speed limits from OpenStreetMap. Trips from a government travel survey were then routed through the network to estimate exposure to different LTS levels under base and alternative scenarios. Additionally, a mode choice model was developed to examine the impact of LTS exposure on cycling likelihood. Finally, an agent-based transport model was used to evaluate the impact of this intervention on car travel time.
Results showed significant reductions in high-LTS exposure with lower speed limits. Under the base case, 27.9% of routes were on LTS-1 roads, and at 30 km/h this increased to 63.3%. Mode choice model results confirmed a strong negative correlation between cycling likelihood and high-LTS exposure. Car travel time impacts were minimal, even for trips largely on residential streets the average was only one minute.
降低车速限制,为骑自行车的人创造更安全、压力更小的环境,是一项被广泛提出的政策,但由于担心会增加出行时间,这一政策经常遭到抵制。本研究通过评估现有限速(基本情景)下的交通压力水平(LTS),以及将住宅街道限速降低至40公里/小时和30公里/小时(替代情景)对骑行LTS和汽车旅行时间的影响,来评估这些担忧。LTS是一种广泛使用的骑行压力测量方法,它将道路分段从LTS-1(压力最小)到LTS-4(压力最大)分类。我们根据OpenStreetMap的自行车基础设施、道路等级、交通量和速度限制,为大墨尔本的所有路段分配了LTS值。然后,从政府旅行调查中得出的行程通过网络进行路由,以估计在基本和替代方案下暴露于不同LTS水平的情况。此外,我们还建立了一种模式选择模型来检验LTS暴露对循环可能性的影响。最后,利用一个基于agent的交通模型来评估这种干预对汽车出行时间的影响。结果显示,较低的速度限制显著减少了高lts暴露。在基本情况下,27.9%的路线在LTS-1道路上,而在30公里/小时的情况下,这一比例增加到63.3%。模式选择模型结果证实了循环可能性与高lts暴露之间的强烈负相关。汽车出行时间的影响很小,即使是在居民区的街道上,平均也只有一分钟。
{"title":"Modelling the impact of lower speed limits on residential streets for cyclist level of traffic stress and car travel time in Greater Melbourne","authors":"Afshin Jafari ,&nbsp;Steve Pemberton ,&nbsp;Sapan Tiwari ,&nbsp;Tayebeh Saghapour ,&nbsp;Nikhil Chand ,&nbsp;Belen Zapata-Diomedi ,&nbsp;Billie Giles-Corti","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100085","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100085","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing speed limits to create safer, lower-stress environments for cyclists is a widely proposed policy but often faces resistance due to concerns about increased travel times. This study evaluates these concerns by assessing Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) under existing speed limits (base scenario) and the effects of reducing residential street speed limits to 40 km/h and 30 km/h (alternative scenarios) on cycling LTS and car travel time.</div><div>LTS is a widely used measure of cycling stress, categorising road segments from LTS-1 (least stressful) to LTS-4 (most stressful). We assigned LTS values to all road segments in Greater Melbourne based on cycling infrastructure, road hierarchy, traffic volume, and speed limits from OpenStreetMap. Trips from a government travel survey were then routed through the network to estimate exposure to different LTS levels under base and alternative scenarios. Additionally, a mode choice model was developed to examine the impact of LTS exposure on cycling likelihood. Finally, an agent-based transport model was used to evaluate the impact of this intervention on car travel time.</div><div>Results showed significant reductions in high-LTS exposure with lower speed limits. Under the base case, 27.9% of routes were on LTS-1 roads, and at 30 km/h this increased to 63.3%. Mode choice model results confirmed a strong negative correlation between cycling likelihood and high-LTS exposure. Car travel time impacts were minimal, even for trips largely on residential streets the average was only one minute.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145060620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to accommodate cycling at intersections. The limits of behavioural measures 如何在十字路口方便骑自行车。行为测量的局限性
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100094
Cinzia Zanetti , Dimitri Marincek , Patrick Rérat
This paper addresses the challenges faced by cycling at intersections, which were initially built to accommodate car traffic. Using the concept of obduracy, defined as the resistance of infrastructure to changes in its original function, we analysed two behavioural measures: the recommendation for cyclists to ride in the middle of the roundabout, and a sign allowing right-turn-on-red at signalised intersections. Our data came from field observations and intercept surveys conducted at 15 locations in Lausanne, Switzerland. We found that the obduracy of intersections operates on three levels: how they are designed (planning, materiality, legislation), how they are perceived (social norms, legitimacy, expertise), and how they are experienced (interactions with other road users). Our findings highlighted that although most cyclists knew the two behavioural measures, they did not always use them, due to low legitimacy, difficulty of use, insufficient safety, or a lack of usefulness. This was specifically the case of riding in the middle of roundabouts: Although Swiss road safety campaigns regularly advised cyclists to do so, the perceived dangers of sharing the road with cars deterred many from following this recommendation. Another overlooked obstacle was other road users’ lack of knowledge of the rules for cyclists, notably right-turn-on-red, which could lead to negative reactions, dangerous behaviour and stigmatisation of cyclists (e.g. wrongly thinking they were running red lights). The paper underlines the limits of behavioural measures and the need for redesigning infrastructure. It also introduces a novel theoretical framework to analyse cycling infrastructure, which could be applied in other settings.
本文讨论了在十字路口骑车所面临的挑战,十字路口最初是为了适应汽车交通而建造的。使用顽固性的概念,定义为基础设施对其原始功能变化的抵抗,我们分析了两种行为措施:建议骑自行车的人在环形交叉路口中间骑行,以及允许在信号交叉路口右转红灯的标志。我们的数据来自于在瑞士洛桑的15个地点进行的实地观察和拦截调查。我们发现,十字路口的顽固存在于三个层面:它们是如何设计的(规划、物质性、立法),它们是如何被感知的(社会规范、合法性、专业知识),以及它们是如何被体验的(与其他道路使用者的互动)。我们的研究结果强调,尽管大多数骑自行车的人知道这两种行为措施,但由于合法性低、使用困难、安全性不足或缺乏实用性,他们并不总是使用它们。尤其是在环岛中间骑车:尽管瑞士的道路安全运动经常建议骑车者这样做,但与汽车共用一条路的危险让许多人放弃了这一建议。另一个被忽视的障碍是其他道路使用者对骑自行车者的规则缺乏了解,特别是右转红灯,这可能会导致负面反应,危险行为和对骑自行车者的污名化(例如错误地认为他们闯红灯)。这篇论文强调了行为措施的局限性以及重新设计基础设施的必要性。它还引入了一个新的理论框架来分析自行车基础设施,这可以应用于其他环境。
{"title":"How to accommodate cycling at intersections. The limits of behavioural measures","authors":"Cinzia Zanetti ,&nbsp;Dimitri Marincek ,&nbsp;Patrick Rérat","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100094","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100094","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper addresses the challenges faced by cycling at intersections, which were initially built to accommodate car traffic. Using the concept of <em>obduracy</em>, defined as the resistance of infrastructure to changes in its original function, we analysed two behavioural measures: the recommendation for cyclists to ride in the middle of the roundabout, and a sign allowing right-turn-on-red at signalised intersections. Our data came from field observations and intercept surveys conducted at 15 locations in Lausanne, Switzerland. We found that the obduracy of intersections operates on three levels: how they are designed (planning, materiality, legislation), how they are perceived (social norms, legitimacy, expertise), and how they are experienced (interactions with other road users). Our findings highlighted that although most cyclists knew the two behavioural measures, they did not always use them, due to low legitimacy, difficulty of use, insufficient safety, or a lack of usefulness. This was specifically the case of riding in the middle of roundabouts: Although Swiss road safety campaigns regularly advised cyclists to do so, the perceived dangers of sharing the road with cars deterred many from following this recommendation. Another overlooked obstacle was other road users’ lack of knowledge of the rules for cyclists, notably right-turn-on-red, which could lead to negative reactions, dangerous behaviour and stigmatisation of cyclists (e.g. wrongly thinking they were running red lights). The paper underlines the limits of behavioural measures and the need for redesigning infrastructure. It also introduces a novel theoretical framework to analyse cycling infrastructure, which could be applied in other settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying e-scooter rider profiles in the United States: A latent class cluster analysis 在美国识别电动滑板车骑手概况:一个潜在的类聚类分析
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100088
Aurojeet Jena , Basar Ozbilen , Alimurtaza Kothawala , Yongsung Lee , Kailai Wang , Charalampos Saridakis , Zia Wadud , Yuanxuan Yang , Susan Grant-Muller , Sebastian Castellanos , Giovanni Circella
The global rise of e-scooters as a novel form of micromobility has reshaped urban transportation. Positioned as a sustainable mobility solution, transportation scholars underline that e-scooters have the potential to replace short car trips, reduce traffic congestion and carbon emissions, and increase energy efficiency of transportation systems. While existing literature has explored e-scooter adoption and trip characteristics extensively, there remains a research gap regarding the classification of e-scooter users. This paper attempts to overcome this deficiency by employing a latent class cluster analysis to classify e-scooter users based on their trip frequency, motivation, and purpose. Data used for the analysis were collected from e-scooter users in Washington, DC and Portland, OR in the United States. The results reveal two distinct classes of e-scooter users: ‘Joyriders’ and ‘Busyriders’. Joyriders tend to be young, female and belong to higher-income and vehicle-affluent households. They use e-scooters for leisure or tourism purposes, valuing pleasure and time savings. Busyriders are predominantly males aged 18–54 from vehicle-deficient households spanning diverse income groups and use e-scooters weekly for commuting, errands, and shopping purposes, prioritizing utilitarian and environmental benefits. The findings of this study can inform policymakers in developing effective e-scooter promotion policies, tailored to the preferences and needs of different user groups. The policy implications from this study can contribute towards the incorporation of e-scooters as a sustainable and efficient travel alternative into urban transportation.
电动滑板车作为一种新型微型交通工具在全球兴起,重塑了城市交通。交通学者强调,作为一种可持续的交通解决方案,电动滑板车有可能取代短途汽车出行,减少交通拥堵和碳排放,并提高交通系统的能源效率。虽然现有文献对电动滑板车的使用和出行特征进行了广泛的探讨,但对电动滑板车用户的分类研究仍然存在空白。本文试图通过使用潜在类聚类分析来根据他们的出行频率,动机和目的对电动滑板车用户进行分类,从而克服这一缺陷。用于分析的数据是从美国华盛顿特区和波特兰的电动滑板车用户中收集的。研究结果显示,电动滑板车用户分为两类:“兜风者”和“忙碌者”。开车兜风的人往往是年轻的女性,属于收入较高、拥有大量车辆的家庭。他们将电动滑板车用于休闲或旅游目的,重视乐趣和节省时间。乘坐电动滑板车的人主要是年龄在18-54岁之间的男性,他们来自不同收入群体的无车家庭,每周使用电动滑板车上下班、办事和购物,优先考虑实用性和环境效益。本研究的结果可以为政策制定者制定有效的电动滑板车推广政策提供参考,以适应不同用户群体的偏好和需求。这项研究的政策意义可以有助于将电动滑板车作为一种可持续和高效的出行选择纳入城市交通。
{"title":"Identifying e-scooter rider profiles in the United States: A latent class cluster analysis","authors":"Aurojeet Jena ,&nbsp;Basar Ozbilen ,&nbsp;Alimurtaza Kothawala ,&nbsp;Yongsung Lee ,&nbsp;Kailai Wang ,&nbsp;Charalampos Saridakis ,&nbsp;Zia Wadud ,&nbsp;Yuanxuan Yang ,&nbsp;Susan Grant-Muller ,&nbsp;Sebastian Castellanos ,&nbsp;Giovanni Circella","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100088","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100088","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global rise of e-scooters as a novel form of micromobility has reshaped urban transportation. Positioned as a sustainable mobility solution, transportation scholars underline that e-scooters have the potential to replace short car trips, reduce traffic congestion and carbon emissions, and increase energy efficiency of transportation systems. While existing literature has explored e-scooter adoption and trip characteristics extensively, there remains a research gap regarding the classification of e-scooter users. This paper attempts to overcome this deficiency by employing a latent class cluster analysis to classify e-scooter users based on their trip frequency, motivation, and purpose. Data used for the analysis were collected from e-scooter users in Washington, DC and Portland, OR in the United States. The results reveal two distinct classes of e-scooter users: ‘Joyriders’ and ‘Busyriders’. Joyriders tend to be young, female and belong to higher-income and vehicle-affluent households. They use e-scooters for leisure or tourism purposes, valuing pleasure and time savings. Busyriders are predominantly males aged 18–54 from vehicle-deficient households spanning diverse income groups and use e-scooters weekly for commuting, errands, and shopping purposes, prioritizing utilitarian and environmental benefits. The findings of this study can inform policymakers in developing effective e-scooter promotion policies, tailored to the preferences and needs of different user groups. The policy implications from this study can contribute towards the incorporation of e-scooters as a sustainable and efficient travel alternative into urban transportation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145320668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are we measuring what matters? A multilayered framework evaluating active mobility infrastructure through PLOS, BLOS and 15 minute city principles 我们衡量的是什么重要吗?通过PLOS、BLOS和15分钟城市原则评估主动移动基础设施的多层框架
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100089
Richa Maheshwari , Martin Loidl , Rupali Khare , Mario Cools
Active mobility is increasingly recognised as the cornerstone of sustainable urban development. Providing suitable infrastructure for walking and cycling is essential for promoting active transport and achieving its associated environmental and health benefits. However, systematically evaluating the suitability of active mobility infrastructure remains a methodological challenge. This paper presents a multilayered conceptual framework designed to assist policymakers, practitioners, and researchers in assessing active mobility infrastructure by integrating Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service models with the principles of the 15 min city. The hierarchical framework organises six broad constructs, such as Facilities, Geometric Design, Built and Natural Environment, Amenities, Proximity and Accessibility, and Flow and Traffic Characteristics, under which 138 unique indicators are classified. A systematic review of 78 studies using the PRISMA protocol guided the development of this structure, revealing both commonly cited and underutilised indicators critical for infrastructure evaluation. The three-layered framework illustrates how pedestrian and cyclist experiences are shaped by the interplay between physical infrastructure, its surrounding environment, and functional performance. It enhances conceptual clarity, reduces redundancy and ambiguities caused by overlapping terminologies, and supports evaluation at both micro and macro scales. It introduces the "Golden Nuggets", i.e., the essential indicators for evaluating non-motorised infrastructure and highlights underused but important metrics. The framework also recommends scaling segment-based assessments to route- and network-based levels, advancing current PLOS and BLOS models. Future research should focus on empirical validation across spatial scales and the development of indicator weighting schemes to enhance the framework’s application as a practical, scalable, and transferable evaluation tool.
人们日益认识到,主动出行是城市可持续发展的基石。为步行和骑自行车提供适当的基础设施对于促进主动交通和实现相关的环境和健康效益至关重要。然而,系统地评估主动移动基础设施的适用性仍然是一个方法上的挑战。本文提出了一个多层概念框架,旨在通过将步行和自行车服务水平模型与15分钟城市原则相结合,帮助政策制定者、从业者和研究人员评估主动移动基础设施。该分级框架组织了六个广泛的结构,如设施,几何设计,建筑和自然环境,便利设施,邻近和可达性,以及流量和交通特征,在138个独特的指标下分类。对使用PRISMA协议的78项研究的系统回顾指导了该结构的发展,揭示了对基础设施评估至关重要的常被引用和未充分利用的指标。这个三层框架说明了行人和骑自行车的人的体验是如何通过物理基础设施、周围环境和功能性能之间的相互作用而形成的。它增强了概念的清晰度,减少了由重叠术语引起的冗余和歧义,并支持微观和宏观尺度的评估。它介绍了“金块”,即评估非机动基础设施的基本指标,并强调了未充分利用但重要的指标。该框架还建议将基于路段的评估扩展到基于路由和网络的水平,推进当前的PLOS和BLOS模型。未来的研究应侧重于跨空间尺度的实证验证和指标加权方案的开发,以增强该框架作为实用、可扩展和可转移的评估工具的应用。
{"title":"Are we measuring what matters? A multilayered framework evaluating active mobility infrastructure through PLOS, BLOS and 15 minute city principles","authors":"Richa Maheshwari ,&nbsp;Martin Loidl ,&nbsp;Rupali Khare ,&nbsp;Mario Cools","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100089","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100089","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Active mobility is increasingly recognised as the cornerstone of sustainable urban development. Providing suitable infrastructure for walking and cycling is essential for promoting active transport and achieving its associated environmental and health benefits. However, systematically evaluating the suitability of active mobility infrastructure remains a methodological challenge. This paper presents a multilayered conceptual framework designed to assist policymakers, practitioners, and researchers in assessing active mobility infrastructure by integrating Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service models with the principles of the 15 min city. The hierarchical framework organises six broad constructs, such as Facilities, Geometric Design, Built and Natural Environment, Amenities, Proximity and Accessibility, and Flow and Traffic Characteristics, under which 138 unique indicators are classified. A systematic review of 78 studies using the PRISMA protocol guided the development of this structure, revealing both commonly cited and underutilised indicators critical for infrastructure evaluation. The three-layered framework illustrates how pedestrian and cyclist experiences are shaped by the interplay between physical infrastructure, its surrounding environment, and functional performance. It enhances conceptual clarity, reduces redundancy and ambiguities caused by overlapping terminologies, and supports evaluation at both micro and macro scales. It introduces the \"Golden Nuggets\", i.e., the essential indicators for evaluating non-motorised infrastructure and highlights underused but important metrics. The framework also recommends scaling segment-based assessments to route- and network-based levels, advancing current PLOS and BLOS models. Future research should focus on empirical validation across spatial scales and the development of indicator weighting schemes to enhance the framework’s application as a practical, scalable, and transferable evaluation tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145158409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identification of plausible low traffic neighbourhoods using open data 利用开放数据确定可行的低交通流量街区
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100097
Chris Larkin , Craig Robson , Alistair Ford
Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) form an important component of urban active travel infrastructure and policy in the United Kingdom. These zones aim to prioritise street space for cycling and walking by reducing motorised traffic within the neighbourhood. While the impacts of these zones have been studied at a local scale, research often relies on bespoke datasets provided by local councils, which are frequently unavailable or do not exist for many urban areas. To examine LTNs at a larger scale, there is a need for tools and methods to identify their locations. This study develops an open, data-driven approach to identify and evaluate plausible LTNs for any Local Authority District in the UK, creating the foundations for a national LTN dataset. The methods are applied to Newcastle Upon Tyne to demonstrate the tool. First, we separate the city into neighbourhoods based on areas where people can cycle or walk comfortably before encountering a severance, such as major roads. For each neighbourhood, three metrics are produced using OpenStreetMap data to measure the transport characteristics of the zone: the density of modal filtering, the presence of traffic through-routes, and permeability difference between active modes and vehicle modes passing through a neighbourhood. Across Newcastle, we identify 215 unique neighbourhoods with 339 modal filters. Notably, 55% of neighbourhoods contain no modal filtering, while 66% have traffic through-routes. Permeability differences with neighbourhoods range from 0 m to 4046 m. Metrics are combined to provide an overall LTN plausibility score, which is visualised through automatically generated web map outputs.
低交通街区(ltn)是英国城市主动出行基础设施和政策的重要组成部分。这些区域旨在通过减少社区内的机动交通,优先考虑自行车和步行的街道空间。虽然这些区域的影响已经在地方范围内进行了研究,但研究往往依赖于地方议会提供的定制数据集,而这些数据集往往无法获得,或者在许多城市地区不存在。为了更大规模地检查ltn,需要工具和方法来确定它们的位置。本研究开发了一种开放的、数据驱动的方法来识别和评估英国任何地方政府区的合理LTN,为国家LTN数据集奠定了基础。将这些方法应用于泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔来演示该工具。首先,我们将城市划分为不同的社区,在这些社区中,人们可以舒适地骑自行车或步行,而不会遇到分隔物,比如主要道路。对于每个社区,使用OpenStreetMap数据生成三个指标来衡量该区域的交通特征:模态过滤的密度,通过路线的交通存在,以及通过社区的主动模式和车辆模式之间的渗透率差异。在整个纽卡斯尔,我们用339个模态过滤器确定了215个独特的社区。值得注意的是,55%的社区没有模态过滤,而66%的社区有通道交通。与邻域的渗透率差异在0 ~ 4046 m之间。这些指标结合起来,提供了一个整体的LTN可信度评分,该评分通过自动生成的网络地图输出可视化。
{"title":"Identification of plausible low traffic neighbourhoods using open data","authors":"Chris Larkin ,&nbsp;Craig Robson ,&nbsp;Alistair Ford","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100097","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100097","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) form an important component of urban active travel infrastructure and policy in the United Kingdom. These zones aim to prioritise street space for cycling and walking by reducing motorised traffic within the neighbourhood. While the impacts of these zones have been studied at a local scale, research often relies on bespoke datasets provided by local councils, which are frequently unavailable or do not exist for many urban areas. To examine LTNs at a larger scale, there is a need for tools and methods to identify their locations. This study develops an open, data-driven approach to identify and evaluate plausible LTNs for any Local Authority District in the UK, creating the foundations for a national LTN dataset. The methods are applied to Newcastle Upon Tyne to demonstrate the tool. First, we separate the city into neighbourhoods based on areas where people can cycle or walk comfortably before encountering a severance, such as major roads. For each neighbourhood, three metrics are produced using OpenStreetMap data to measure the transport characteristics of the zone: the density of modal filtering, the presence of traffic through-routes, and permeability difference between active modes and vehicle modes passing through a neighbourhood. Across Newcastle, we identify 215 unique neighbourhoods with 339 modal filters. Notably, 55% of neighbourhoods contain no modal filtering, while 66% have traffic through-routes. Permeability differences with neighbourhoods range from 0 m to 4046 m. Metrics are combined to provide an overall LTN plausibility score, which is visualised through automatically generated web map outputs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145416397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clutter from parked e-scooters: Effects of dedicated spaces 停放的电动滑板车造成的混乱:专用空间的影响
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100091
Katrine Karlsen, Petr Pokorny, Espen Johnsson, Aslak Fyhri
Shared e-scooters are popular, but improperly parked e-scooters impede access for pedestrians. Policymakers need knowledge about the impact and limitations of parking measures to reduce clutter. This paper evaluates pilots that introduced dedicated e-scooter parking places in areas with free-floating parking. Parking racks were implemented in a borough in Oslo, while painted spaces were introduced in the city centres of Oslo and Trondheim. The parking measures were evaluated using video recordings, GPS-data and surveys. Results show that about two thirds of riders ending their trip in the vicinity of a parking measure park in or near the measure. The parking becomes more concentrated around the measures and there is a clear reduction in the share of e-scooters in the area that impede access for pedestrians. The large variations from site to site indicate that the exact placement of the parking measure is important. The effect of voluntary parking measures is greatest in the immediate vicinity and appears to fade away about 70 m from the measures. Non-riders experience parked e-scooter as an obstacle to a significantly greater extent than riders do, and there was no significant decrease in perceptions of e-scooters as an obstacle after a parking rack was placed. Overall, voluntary parking measures appear to improve parking behaviour in the immediate vicinity, but do not eliminate problematic parking.
共享电动滑板车很受欢迎,但停放不当的电动滑板车阻碍了行人的通行。政策制定者需要了解停车措施的影响和局限性,以减少混乱。本文对在自由浮动停车场引入电动滑板车专用停车位的试点进行了评价。在奥斯陆的一个自治市镇安装了停车架,而在奥斯陆和特隆赫姆的市中心引入了彩色空间。通过录像、gps数据和调查对停车措施进行了评估。结果显示,大约三分之二的乘客在停车措施附近停车或在该措施附近停车。停车场变得更加集中在这些措施周围,阻碍行人通行的电动滑板车的比例明显减少。不同地点之间的巨大差异表明停车措施的确切位置很重要。自愿停车措施的效果在邻近地区最大,并在措施实施70 m后逐渐消失。与骑车者相比,不骑车者将停放的电动滑板车视为障碍的程度要大得多,而且在放置停放架后,将电动滑板车视为障碍的感觉并没有显著下降。总的来说,自愿停车措施似乎改善了附近地区的停车行为,但并没有消除停车问题。
{"title":"Clutter from parked e-scooters: Effects of dedicated spaces","authors":"Katrine Karlsen,&nbsp;Petr Pokorny,&nbsp;Espen Johnsson,&nbsp;Aslak Fyhri","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100091","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100091","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared e-scooters are popular, but improperly parked e-scooters impede access for pedestrians. Policymakers need knowledge about the impact and limitations of parking measures to reduce clutter. This paper evaluates pilots that introduced dedicated e-scooter parking places in areas with free-floating parking. Parking racks were implemented in a borough in Oslo, while painted spaces were introduced in the city centres of Oslo and Trondheim. The parking measures were evaluated using video recordings, GPS-data and surveys. Results show that about two thirds of riders ending their trip in the vicinity of a parking measure park in or near the measure. The parking becomes more concentrated around the measures and there is a clear reduction in the share of e-scooters in the area that impede access for pedestrians. The large variations from site to site indicate that the exact placement of the parking measure is important. The effect of voluntary parking measures is greatest in the immediate vicinity and appears to fade away about 70 m from the measures. Non-riders experience parked e-scooter as an obstacle to a significantly greater extent than riders do, and there was no significant decrease in perceptions of e-scooters as an obstacle after a parking rack was placed. Overall, voluntary parking measures appear to improve parking behaviour in the immediate vicinity, but do not eliminate problematic parking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145220952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
School bikeability index: A case study of primary schools in Stockholm 学校骑自行车指数:斯德哥尔摩小学的案例研究
Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100074
Ivana Paulusová, Fariya Sharmeen
In most developed countries, active travel to and from school has declined over the past few decades. In Sweden, active travel among children and young adults declined by 40 % between 1995 and 2014. To remedy and reverse this trend, it is crucial to understand and establish the necessary preconditions for promoting active school travel, i.e. built environment and infrastructural provisions. Within that context, this paper presents a school bikeability index for Stockholm, focusing primarily on built environment indicators. These indicators were weighted according to their importance as perceived by children’s guardians in Stockholm. The study provides insights into possible correlates of importance of bikeability indicators, suggesting different valuations by guardians depending on their gender and children’s age. The spatial analysis shows a variability of school bikeability across the city. Findings suggest that overall many of the primary schools could significantly enhance their bikeability by implementing measures such as, bicycle parking, traffic calming signage and connecting school entrances directly to cycle paths. Closer investigations of some of the highest- and lowest-scoring schools and selected school pairs inform that even the high-scoring schools are often lacking in implementation of some children-friendly cycling infrastructure, and that low-scoring schools could benefit from implementing some, relatively low-cost improvements. An equity analysis shows no significant differences between school bikeability scores and average income. Open access data were utilised, allowing the methodology to be replicable in other cities. For future iterations of the index, it would be beneficial to refine and validate the index weights while incorporating additional indicators. This process should account for their complexity and the varying valuations assigned by different groups, including children themselves.
在大多数发达国家,在过去的几十年里,频繁往返学校的人数已经减少了。在瑞典,儿童和年轻人的积极旅行在1995年至2014年间下降了40% %。为了纠正和扭转这一趋势,至关重要的是要了解和建立促进积极的学校旅行的必要先决条件,即建筑环境和基础设施的规定。在此背景下,本文提出了斯德哥尔摩的学校自行车指数,主要关注建筑环境指标。这些指标是根据斯德哥尔摩儿童监护人所认为的重要性进行加权的。该研究提供了对可骑自行车指标重要性的可能相关性的见解,表明监护人根据其性别和儿童年龄的不同估值。空间分析显示了整个城市的学校骑自行车的可变性。研究结果表明,总体而言,许多小学可以通过实施措施,如自行车停放、交通平静标志和将学校入口直接连接到自行车道等,显著提高骑自行车的适宜性。对一些得分最高和最低的学校以及选定的学校对进行的更深入的调查表明,即使是得分高的学校也往往缺乏一些儿童友好型自行车基础设施的实施,而得分低的学校可以从实施一些相对低成本的改进中受益。一项公平分析显示,学校骑自行车得分和平均收入之间没有显著差异。使用了开放获取数据,使该方法可以在其他城市复制。对于索引的未来迭代,在合并其他指标的同时改进和验证索引权重将是有益的。这一过程应考虑到它们的复杂性和不同群体,包括儿童本身所赋予的不同价值。
{"title":"School bikeability index: A case study of primary schools in Stockholm","authors":"Ivana Paulusová,&nbsp;Fariya Sharmeen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100074","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100074","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In most developed countries, active travel to and from school has declined over the past few decades. In Sweden, active travel among children and young adults declined by 40 % between 1995 and 2014. To remedy and reverse this trend, it is crucial to understand and establish the necessary preconditions for promoting active school travel, i.e. built environment and infrastructural provisions. Within that context, this paper presents a school bikeability index for Stockholm, focusing primarily on built environment indicators. These indicators were weighted according to their importance as perceived by children’s guardians in Stockholm. The study provides insights into possible correlates of importance of bikeability indicators, suggesting different valuations by guardians depending on their gender and children’s age. The spatial analysis shows a variability of school bikeability across the city. Findings suggest that overall many of the primary schools could significantly enhance their bikeability by implementing measures such as, bicycle parking, traffic calming signage and connecting school entrances directly to cycle paths. Closer investigations of some of the highest- and lowest-scoring schools and selected school pairs inform that even the high-scoring schools are often lacking in implementation of some children-friendly cycling infrastructure, and that low-scoring schools could benefit from implementing some, relatively low-cost improvements. An equity analysis shows no significant differences between school bikeability scores and average income. Open access data were utilised, allowing the methodology to be replicable in other cities. For future iterations of the index, it would be beneficial to refine and validate the index weights while incorporating additional indicators. This process should account for their complexity and the varying valuations assigned by different groups, including children themselves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144263467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to create a sustainable growth in bicycle traffic? The case of Paris 如何实现自行车交通的可持续增长?巴黎的案例
Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100081
Alexandre Lanvin , Jean Charléty , Guillaume Ferreol , Anatole Homann , Elliot Massey , Alix Vermeulen , Alexandre Chasse
In recent years, cycling has received notable investments in response to the urge to decarbonize the transportation sector, leading to an increase in its modal share in many territories. The present article presents a longitudinal study that evaluates the impact of various public policies on bicycle growth in Paris over the period 2018–2023. Variables of interest can be classified according to five themes: targeted cycling policies, restrictions imposed on motorized vehicles, disruptions on other modes of transport, livability policies, and economic conditions. The methodology is based on dependence-aware sensitivity analysis techniques to assess the separate contributions of each of these variables on bicycle traffic, aggregated at the city scale, and extracted from ground counter data. In order to be exhaustive, variations due to weather and calendar dynamics are also controlled for. Results indicate that local authorities should primarily focus on the development of bicycle infrastructure, including bicycle lanes, parking slots, and effective bicycle-sharing systems. While these measures are instrumental, sustainable growth relies on the implementation of a diverse range of policies. Bicycle usage can be further expanded by making it more attractive, specifically through the creation of pedestrian zones and green spaces, or the promotion of e-bikes. Additionally, cycling tends to increase as car usage becomes more difficult, although this finding calls for equity considerations.
近年来,为了应对交通部门脱碳的迫切需求,自行车得到了显著的投资,导致其在许多地区的模式份额增加。本文提出了一项纵向研究,评估了2018-2023年期间各种公共政策对巴黎自行车增长的影响。感兴趣的变量可以根据五个主题进行分类:有针对性的自行车政策、对机动车辆的限制、对其他交通方式的干扰、宜居政策和经济状况。该方法基于依赖感知敏感性分析技术,评估每个变量对自行车交通的单独贡献,以城市规模汇总,并从地面计数器数据中提取。为了更加详尽,由于天气和日历动态的变化也被控制。结果表明,地方当局应主要关注自行车基础设施的发展,包括自行车道、停车位和有效的自行车共享系统。虽然这些措施是有用的,但可持续增长依赖于实施各种各样的政策。自行车的使用可以通过使其更具吸引力来进一步扩大,特别是通过创建步行区和绿地,或推广电动自行车。此外,随着汽车的使用变得更加困难,骑自行车的人往往会增加,尽管这一发现需要公平的考虑。
{"title":"How to create a sustainable growth in bicycle traffic? The case of Paris","authors":"Alexandre Lanvin ,&nbsp;Jean Charléty ,&nbsp;Guillaume Ferreol ,&nbsp;Anatole Homann ,&nbsp;Elliot Massey ,&nbsp;Alix Vermeulen ,&nbsp;Alexandre Chasse","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100081","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100081","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, cycling has received notable investments in response to the urge to decarbonize the transportation sector, leading to an increase in its modal share in many territories. The present article presents a longitudinal study that evaluates the impact of various public policies on bicycle growth in Paris over the period 2018–2023. Variables of interest can be classified according to five themes: targeted cycling policies, restrictions imposed on motorized vehicles, disruptions on other modes of transport, livability policies, and economic conditions. The methodology is based on dependence-aware sensitivity analysis techniques to assess the separate contributions of each of these variables on bicycle traffic, aggregated at the city scale, and extracted from ground counter data. In order to be exhaustive, variations due to weather and calendar dynamics are also controlled for. Results indicate that local authorities should primarily focus on the development of bicycle infrastructure, including bicycle lanes, parking slots, and effective bicycle-sharing systems. While these measures are instrumental, sustainable growth relies on the implementation of a diverse range of policies. Bicycle usage can be further expanded by making it more attractive, specifically through the creation of pedestrian zones and green spaces, or the promotion of e-bikes. Additionally, cycling tends to increase as car usage becomes more difficult, although this finding calls for equity considerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144889373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cycling speed profiles from GPS data: Insights for conventional and electrified bicycles in Switzerland 来自GPS数据的骑行速度概况:对瑞士传统自行车和电动自行车的见解
Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100077
Laurin F. Maurer, Adrian Meister, Kay W. Axhausen
Understanding cycling speed dynamics is crucial for effective transportation planning and infrastructure development. This study analyzes GPS-based cycling speed profiles in Zurich, Switzerland, focusing on conventional bicycles, e-bikes (25 km/h), and speed pedelecs (45 km/h). Using GPS data from 351 cyclists, we examine the influence of socio-demographic factors (age, gender, BMI), road infrastructure, gradients, and weather conditions on cycling speeds. Our findings reveal that speed pedelecs achieve the highest speeds, frequently exceeding residential speed limits, raising questions about their classification and integration into urban mobility networks. Machine learning models identify road gradients, BMI, and age as key determinants of cycling speed. Additionally, results show that e-bikes and speed pedelecs experience longer intersection delays. These insights offer valuable contributions to urban transport policies, cycling infrastructure planning, and traffic modeling, ensuring safer and more efficient mobility solutions.
了解骑行速度动态对于有效的交通规划和基础设施建设至关重要。本研究分析了瑞士苏黎世基于gps的自行车速度分布,重点是传统自行车、电动自行车(25公里/小时)和速度自行车(45公里/小时)。利用351名骑行者的GPS数据,研究了社会人口因素(年龄、性别、BMI)、道路基础设施、坡度和天气条件对骑行速度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,速度自行车达到了最高的速度,经常超过住宅的速度限制,这就提出了关于它们的分类和融入城市交通网络的问题。机器学习模型将道路坡度、BMI和年龄识别为自行车速度的关键决定因素。此外,研究结果还表明,电动自行车和超速自行车在十字路口的延误时间更长。这些见解为城市交通政策、自行车基础设施规划和交通建模提供了宝贵的贡献,确保了更安全、更高效的出行解决方案。
{"title":"Cycling speed profiles from GPS data: Insights for conventional and electrified bicycles in Switzerland","authors":"Laurin F. Maurer,&nbsp;Adrian Meister,&nbsp;Kay W. Axhausen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100077","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100077","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding cycling speed dynamics is crucial for effective transportation planning and infrastructure development. This study analyzes GPS-based cycling speed profiles in Zurich, Switzerland, focusing on conventional bicycles, e-bikes (25 km/h), and speed pedelecs (45 km/h). Using GPS data from 351 cyclists, we examine the influence of socio-demographic factors (age, gender, BMI), road infrastructure, gradients, and weather conditions on cycling speeds. Our findings reveal that speed pedelecs achieve the highest speeds, frequently exceeding residential speed limits, raising questions about their classification and integration into urban mobility networks. Machine learning models identify road gradients, BMI, and age as key determinants of cycling speed. Additionally, results show that e-bikes and speed pedelecs experience longer intersection delays. These insights offer valuable contributions to urban transport policies, cycling infrastructure planning, and traffic modeling, ensuring safer and more efficient mobility solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144714590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1