Pub Date : 2000-08-01DOI: 10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90075-6
O Fourcade , M.F Simon , F Le Balle , J Fauvel , M Génestal , B Cathala , H Chap
Phospholipase A2 are enzymes that hydrolyse the sn-2 position of glycerophospholipids, and play a pivotal role in the generation of lipid inflammatory mediators. The type IIA secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) is a distal effector of inflammation, produced by a number of cells challenged with inflammatory stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor or interleukin-1. Hydrolysis of the glycerophospholipids generates arachidonic acid, which is implicated in eicosanoid synthesis, and some important lipid mediators such as lyso-platelet activating factor, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), or lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC). High levels of sPLA2 are found in the plasma of patients suffering from sepsis, septic shock, adult respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. The levels are correlated to the intensity of the systemic inflammatory response and possibly to the outcome. This review presents important results concerning the pathophysiological implications of sPLA2 in inflammatory disorders. We also present the role of LPA and LPC. The utility of the determination of sPLA2 activity in clinical practice is discussed.
{"title":"Phospholipase A2 sécrétée de type IIA et syndrome inflammatoire","authors":"O Fourcade , M.F Simon , F Le Balle , J Fauvel , M Génestal , B Cathala , H Chap","doi":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90075-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90075-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phospholipase A<sub>2</sub> are enzymes that hydrolyse the <em>sn</em>-2 position of glycerophospholipids, and play a pivotal role in the generation of lipid inflammatory mediators. The type IIA secretory phospholipase A<sub>2</sub> (sPLA<sub>2</sub>) is a distal effector of inflammation, produced by a number of cells challenged with inflammatory stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor or interleukin-1. Hydrolysis of the glycerophospholipids generates arachidonic acid, which is implicated in eicosanoid synthesis, and some important lipid mediators such as lyso-platelet activating factor, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), or lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC). High levels of sPLA<sub>2</sub> are found in the plasma of patients suffering from sepsis, septic shock, adult respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. The levels are correlated to the intensity of the systemic inflammatory response and possibly to the outcome. This review presents important results concerning the pathophysiological implications of sPLA<sub>2</sub> in inflammatory disorders. We also present the role of LPA and LPC. The utility of the determination of sPLA<sub>2</sub> activity in clinical practice is discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101063,"journal":{"name":"Réanimation Urgences","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 355-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90075-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76886943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-08-01DOI: 10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0
J Reboul-Marty , P Thoreux , M Debien , J.L Roynard , M Durand , G Languillat
The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit.
Methods: French-speaking patients and volunteers that came to the emergency unit between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm were included in the study for a two-week period. In order to obtain reliable responses, the investigators interviewed the patients face to face with the assistance of a specific questionnaire.
Results: Fifty-two percent of the 514 interviewed patients agreed to answer the investigators' questions; the major reason for failure to reply was the lack of time. Using the Principal Components Analysis, the data were gathered into six dimensions: reception, waiting room 1, waiting room 2, staff appreciation, communication, and waiting time. Six scores of dissatisfaction were established, ranging from 0 (most satisfied) to 100 (most dissatisfied). The results showed that the most worrying point was the waiting (45 ± 22 min). The perception of the length of waiting time was statistically related (P < 0.0001) to the time spent in the emergency unit, contrary to its tolerance. The second point of dissatisfaction was the location (waiting room 1:30 ± 22; waiting room 2.31 ± 22). Finally, the most motivating point for the staff was the recognition of their work by the patients (28 ± 15).
Conclusion: This study found the reasons for the published dissatisfaction. Its intent was to quantify the degree of dissatisfaction and to treat the problems on a hierarchical basis, thus making it possible to better meet the patients' needs. The assessment of patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit is possible but implies a significant deployment of means to obtain a satisfying response rate.
{"title":"L'évaluation de la satisfaction des patients des services d'urgences est-elle possible?","authors":"J Reboul-Marty , P Thoreux , M Debien , J.L Roynard , M Durand , G Languillat","doi":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> French-speaking patients and volunteers that came to the emergency unit between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm were included in the study for a two-week period. In order to obtain reliable responses, the investigators interviewed the patients face to face with the assistance of a specific questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Fifty-two percent of the 514 interviewed patients agreed to answer the investigators' questions; the major reason for failure to reply was the lack of time. Using the Principal Components Analysis, the data were gathered into six dimensions: reception, waiting room 1, waiting room 2, staff appreciation, communication, and waiting time. Six scores of dissatisfaction were established, ranging from 0 (most satisfied) to 100 (most dissatisfied). The results showed that the most worrying point was the waiting (45 ± 22 min). The perception of the length of waiting time was statistically related (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) to the time spent in the emergency unit, contrary to its tolerance. The second point of dissatisfaction was the location (waiting room 1:30 ± 22; waiting room 2.31 ± 22). Finally, the most motivating point for the staff was the recognition of their work by the patients (28 ± 15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study found the reasons for the published dissatisfaction. Its intent was to quantify the degree of dissatisfaction and to treat the problems on a hierarchical basis, thus making it possible to better meet the patients' needs. The assessment of patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit is possible but implies a significant deployment of means to obtain a satisfying response rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101063,"journal":{"name":"Réanimation Urgences","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84607384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}