首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Oncology Insight最新文献

英文 中文
Outcomes of mediastinal envelope closure during minimally invasive esophagectomy 微创食管切除术中纵隔包膜封闭的效果
Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100104
Cynthia J. Susai , Katemanee Burapachaisri , Yun-Yi Hung , Kian C. Banks , Nathan J. Alcasid , Rachel E. Wile , Katherine E. Barnes , Jeffrey B. Velotta

Background

Limited outcomes data exists regarding whether mediastinal envelope closure during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is related to outcomes including anastomotic leak and postoperative pyloric dilation. We hypothesized that mediastinal envelope closure would be associated with fewer adverse outcomes.

Methods

Patients undergoing MIE between 9/1/2017 and 11/15/2021 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups, complete envelope closure (CC) or partially closed/ not closed (NC), and baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate variables associated with a composite outcome of anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation.

Results

We identified 181 patients. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, smoking history, CCI, ECOG status, operative duration, cancer stage/histology, intraoperative fluids, EBL, and EEA size were not statistically different between the CC and NC groups, though use of indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence evaluation (ICG) was significantly different (24.5 % versus 67.6 %, p <0.001). The CC group experienced lower rates of anastomotic leak (2 % vs 14.7 %, p = 0.007), postoperative pyloric dilation (15.6 % vs 32.4 %, p = 0.025), and delayed gastric emptying (6.1 % vs 20.6 %, p = 0.015). Risk factors for a composite outcome defined as anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression, and NC was an independent predictor of this composite outcome (aOR 3.74, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Complete mediastinal envelope closure is associated with decreased rates of anastomotic leak, postoperative pyloric dilation, and delayed gastric emptying. Further prospective trials involving mediastinal envelope closure are warranted to elucidate its positive effect on postoperative outcomes.
背景关于微创食管切除术(MIE)中纵隔包膜封闭是否与吻合口漏和术后幽门扩张等结果有关的结果数据有限。我们假设纵隔包膜闭合与较少的不良后果相关。方法研究了2017年1月9日至2021年11月15日期间接受MIE手术的患者。将患者分为两组,即完全包膜闭合(CC)或部分闭合/未闭合(NC),并比较基线特征和结果。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估与吻合口漏和/或幽门扩张综合结果相关的变量。CC组和NC组的年龄、性别、种族/民族、体重指数、吸烟史、CCI、ECOG状态、手术持续时间、癌症分期/组织学、术中液体、EBL和EEA大小无统计学差异,但吲哚菁绿增强荧光评估(ICG)的使用率有显著差异(24.5%对67.6%,P<0.001)。CC组的吻合口漏(2% vs 14.7%,p = 0.007)、术后幽门扩张(15.6% vs 32.4%,p = 0.025)和胃排空延迟(6.1% vs 20.6%,p = 0.015)发生率较低。结论纵隔包膜完全闭合与吻合口漏、术后幽门扩张和胃排空延迟的发生率降低有关。有必要进一步开展纵隔包膜封闭的前瞻性试验,以阐明其对术后结果的积极影响。
{"title":"Outcomes of mediastinal envelope closure during minimally invasive esophagectomy","authors":"Cynthia J. Susai ,&nbsp;Katemanee Burapachaisri ,&nbsp;Yun-Yi Hung ,&nbsp;Kian C. Banks ,&nbsp;Nathan J. Alcasid ,&nbsp;Rachel E. Wile ,&nbsp;Katherine E. Barnes ,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Velotta","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100104","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100104","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited outcomes data exists regarding whether mediastinal envelope closure during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is related to outcomes including anastomotic leak and postoperative pyloric dilation. We hypothesized that mediastinal envelope closure would be associated with fewer adverse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing MIE between 9/1/2017 and 11/15/2021 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups, complete envelope closure (CC) or partially closed/ not closed (NC), and baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate variables associated with a composite outcome of anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 181 patients. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, smoking history, CCI, ECOG status, operative duration, cancer stage/histology, intraoperative fluids, EBL, and EEA size were not statistically different between the CC and NC groups, though use of indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence evaluation (ICG) was significantly different (24.5 % versus 67.6 %, p &lt;0.001). The CC group experienced lower rates of anastomotic leak (2 % vs 14.7 %, p = 0.007), postoperative pyloric dilation (15.6 % vs 32.4 %, p = 0.025), and delayed gastric emptying (6.1 % vs 20.6 %, p = 0.015). Risk factors for a composite outcome defined as anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression, and NC was an independent predictor of this composite outcome (aOR 3.74, p = 0.007).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Complete mediastinal envelope closure is associated with decreased rates of anastomotic leak, postoperative pyloric dilation, and delayed gastric emptying. Further prospective trials involving mediastinal envelope closure are warranted to elucidate its positive effect on postoperative outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142554646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world analysis of neuroendocrine tumor misdiagnosis and associated costs 神经内分泌肿瘤误诊及相关费用的真实世界分析
Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100105
Callisia N. Clarke , David Ray , Nicole Princic , Meghan Moynihan , Alexandria Phan

Purpose

Conditions for which neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is commonly misdiagnosed were compared among patients with and without NET, and the associated healthcare costs were described.

Methods

Adults with a NET diagnosis were selected retrospectively from the IBM MarketScan claims databases during 1/1/2015–12/31/2018 (earliest = index), comprising the NET cases. Non-NET controls included age/gender matched patients without any cancer diagnoses. Patients were followed for a five year look back period when conditions for which NET is commonly misdiagnosed (gastrointestinal, respiratory, metabolic [i.e. liver disease], dermatologic) were measured and compared between cases and matched controls using odds ratios. Misdiagnosis-related costs were reported per patient per month (PPPM) from the earliest misdiagnosis to NET diagnosis. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma misdiagnoses and related costs were reported separately.

Results

This analysis included 3460 NET cases and 10,370 non-NET controls (mean age 61 years). Compared to non-NET controls, 70 % of NET cases had a diagnosis of a gastrointestinal, respiratory, metabolic, or dermatologic condition, with 2.07 higher odds (95 % CI 1.91–2.25). Median time from earliest potential misdiagnosis to NET was 3.4 years. Overall mean (standard deviation) healthcare costs related to misdiagnoses were $2858 ($6495) PPPM. Costs were highest for gastrointestinal misdiagnoses ($3350 [$7108]). Among NET cases, 69 (2 %) patients had a pancreatic adenocarcinoma misdiagnosis; related PPPM costs were substantial ($29,321 [$62,385]) and driven by outpatient services including treatment administration.

Conclusion

The increased odds of common misdiagnosis conditions among NET cases compared with non-NET controls, contributing to unnecessary healthcare costs, supports the need for accurate identification of NET.

Synopsis

The majority of patients with NET (70 %) were previously misdiagnosed, occurring a median of 3.4 years before correct diagnosis. Total mean healthcare costs related to misdiagnoses were $2858 PPPM and costs related to pancreatic adenocarcinoma misdiagnoses were substantial ($29,321 PPPM).
目的比较神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者和非NET患者中常被误诊的疾病,并描述相关的医疗费用。方法从IBM MarketScan索赔数据库中回顾性选取2015年1月1日-2018年12月31日期间确诊为NET的成人(最早=索引),组成NET病例。非NET对照组包括年龄/性别匹配、未确诊任何癌症的患者。对患者进行为期五年的回访,测量NET常被误诊的病症(胃肠道、呼吸道、代谢[即肝病]、皮肤病),并使用几率比对病例和匹配对照进行比较。从最早误诊到确诊为胰腺癌,每位患者每月与误诊相关的费用(PPPM)均有报告。胰腺癌误诊患者及相关费用单独报告。结果该分析包括3460例NET病例和10370例非NET对照病例(平均年龄61岁)。与非NET对照组相比,70%的NET病例被诊断为胃肠道、呼吸道、代谢或皮肤病,几率高出2.07(95 % CI 1.91-2.25)。从最早的潜在误诊到确诊为NET的中位时间为3.4年。与误诊相关的总体平均医疗费用(标准差)为每人每年 2858 美元(6495 美元)。胃肠道误诊的费用最高(3350 [7108] 美元)。在NET病例中,有69例(2%)患者被误诊为胰腺癌;相关的PPPM费用高达29,321美元[62,385美元],主要由门诊服务(包括治疗管理)造成。与误诊相关的医疗费用总平均值为 2858 美元(PPPM),而与胰腺癌误诊相关的费用则相当可观(29,321 美元(PPPM))。
{"title":"Real-world analysis of neuroendocrine tumor misdiagnosis and associated costs","authors":"Callisia N. Clarke ,&nbsp;David Ray ,&nbsp;Nicole Princic ,&nbsp;Meghan Moynihan ,&nbsp;Alexandria Phan","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100105","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100105","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Conditions for which neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is commonly misdiagnosed were compared among patients with and without NET, and the associated healthcare costs were described.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults with a NET diagnosis were selected retrospectively from the IBM MarketScan claims databases during 1/1/2015–12/31/2018 (earliest = index), comprising the NET cases. Non-NET controls included age/gender matched patients without any cancer diagnoses. Patients were followed for a five year look back period when conditions for which NET is commonly misdiagnosed (gastrointestinal, respiratory, metabolic [i.e. liver disease], dermatologic) were measured and compared between cases and matched controls using odds ratios. Misdiagnosis-related costs were reported per patient per month (PPPM) from the earliest misdiagnosis to NET diagnosis. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma misdiagnoses and related costs were reported separately.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This analysis included 3460 NET cases and 10,370 non-NET controls (mean age 61 years). Compared to non-NET controls, 70 % of NET cases had a diagnosis of a gastrointestinal, respiratory, metabolic, or dermatologic condition, with 2.07 higher odds (95 % CI 1.91–2.25). Median time from earliest potential misdiagnosis to NET was 3.4 years. Overall mean (standard deviation) healthcare costs related to misdiagnoses were $2858 ($6495) PPPM. Costs were highest for gastrointestinal misdiagnoses ($3350 [$7108]). Among NET cases, 69 (2 %) patients had a pancreatic adenocarcinoma misdiagnosis; related PPPM costs were substantial ($29,321 [$62,385]) and driven by outpatient services including treatment administration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The increased odds of common misdiagnosis conditions among NET cases compared with non-NET controls, contributing to unnecessary healthcare costs, supports the need for accurate identification of NET.</div></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><div>The majority of patients with NET (70 %) were previously misdiagnosed, occurring a median of 3.4 years before correct diagnosis. Total mean healthcare costs related to misdiagnoses were $2858 PPPM and costs related to pancreatic adenocarcinoma misdiagnoses were substantial ($29,321 PPPM).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142531314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Definition of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma based on the concordance index and optimal treatment strategy 基于一致性指数和最佳治疗策略的肝细胞癌早期复发定义
Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100106
Kei Kitamura, Toshiro Ogura, Ibuki Fujinuma, Satoshi Nomura, Takashi Fukuda, Amane Takahashi

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high rate of recurrence and requires multiple treatment options. Early recurrence has been associated with poor prognosis; however, the timing of early recurrence varies in the literature. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the timing of early recurrence with the best prognostic value and clarify the appropriate treatment strategy.

Methods

This retrospective study conducted to determine prognosis and treatments included 274 patients with HCC who underwent liver resection at the Saitama Cancer Center. The prognostic value of early recurrence at each surveillance period was calculated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index).

Results

The C-index at 9 months postoperatively was 0.656, which was the highest cut-off value for early recurrence. Notably, 122 patients had no recurrence, 58 had early recurrence (<9 months), and 94 had late recurrence (≥9 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with early recurrence was worse (16.5 %, p<0.001), whereas that of those with late and no recurrences were similar (79.2 % vs. 70.9 %, p=0.86). The 5-year OS rate of patients with late intrahepatic recurrence in the surgery group was 100 %.

Conclusion

The optimal cutoff value for the timing of early recurrence was 9 months postoperatively. The early recurrence group had a high rate of extrahepatic recurrence and poor OS, whereas late recurrences were mostly intrahepatic, with no difference in prognosis between the late and no recurrence groups. Patients with intrahepatic recurrence after >9 months are considered for rehepatectomy because of its good outcomes.

Synopsis

The C-index-based optimal cutoff for the timing of early HCC recurrence was 9 months postoperatively. The early recurrence group had a high rate of extrahepatic recurrence and poor OS, whereas late recurrences were mostly intrahepatic with a good prognosis.
背景肝细胞癌(HCC)的复发率很高,需要多种治疗方案。早期复发与预后不良有关;然而,文献中关于早期复发的时机却不尽相同。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在确定具有最佳预后价值的早期复发时机,并明确适当的治疗策略。方法这项为确定预后和治疗方法而进行的回顾性研究纳入了 274 名在埼玉癌症中心接受肝切除术的 HCC 患者。结果 术后 9 个月时的 C 指数为 0.656,是早期复发的最高临界值。值得注意的是,122 例患者无复发,58 例早期复发(9 个月),94 例晚期复发(≥9 个月)。早期复发患者的 5 年总生存率(OS)较差(16.5%,p<0.001),而晚期复发和无复发患者的 5 年总生存率相似(79.2% vs. 70.9%,p=0.86)。结论 早期复发时间的最佳临界值为术后 9 个月。早期复发组的肝外复发率高,OS差,而晚期复发多为肝内复发,晚期复发组与无复发组的预后无差异。>9个月后肝内复发的患者可考虑再次肝切除术,因为其疗效较好。简要说明基于C指数的早期HCC复发时间最佳临界点为术后9个月。早期复发组肝外复发率高,OS差,而晚期复发多为肝内复发,预后良好。
{"title":"Definition of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma based on the concordance index and optimal treatment strategy","authors":"Kei Kitamura,&nbsp;Toshiro Ogura,&nbsp;Ibuki Fujinuma,&nbsp;Satoshi Nomura,&nbsp;Takashi Fukuda,&nbsp;Amane Takahashi","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100106","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100106","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high rate of recurrence and requires multiple treatment options. Early recurrence has been associated with poor prognosis; however, the timing of early recurrence varies in the literature. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the timing of early recurrence with the best prognostic value and clarify the appropriate treatment strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study conducted to determine prognosis and treatments included 274 patients with HCC who underwent liver resection at the Saitama Cancer Center. The prognostic value of early recurrence at each surveillance period was calculated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The C-index at 9 months postoperatively was 0.656, which was the highest cut-off value for early recurrence. Notably, 122 patients had no recurrence, 58 had early recurrence (&lt;9 months), and 94 had late recurrence (≥9 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with early recurrence was worse (16.5 %, p&lt;0.001), whereas that of those with late and no recurrences were similar (79.2 % vs. 70.9 %, p=0.86). The 5-year OS rate of patients with late intrahepatic recurrence in the surgery group was 100 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The optimal cutoff value for the timing of early recurrence was 9 months postoperatively. The early recurrence group had a high rate of extrahepatic recurrence and poor OS, whereas late recurrences were mostly intrahepatic, with no difference in prognosis between the late and no recurrence groups. Patients with intrahepatic recurrence after &gt;9 months are considered for rehepatectomy because of its good outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><div>The C-index-based optimal cutoff for the timing of early HCC recurrence was 9 months postoperatively. The early recurrence group had a high rate of extrahepatic recurrence and poor OS, whereas late recurrences were mostly intrahepatic with a good prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142531313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variability in treatment approaches, outcomes, and recurrence patterns after curative intent treatment for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas in Latin America: A report on 333 patients from LATAMSARC collaborative working group 拉丁美洲原发性腹膜后肉瘤治愈性治疗后的治疗方法、结果和复发模式的差异:拉丁美洲腹膜后肉瘤协作工作组关于 333 名患者的报告
Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100103
Dorian Yarih García-Ortega , Sergio Damian Quildrian , Nicolas A. Devaud , Catherine Sarre-Lazcano , Diana Otero Norza , Paul Adriazola Vicente

Background and objective

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors with several well-defined histologic subtypes. This study aimed to assess the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma in Latin America and analyze patterns of recurrence and treatment variations in a large population of patients treated at reference centers.

Methods

This retrospective descriptive study utilized an electronic database of medical records from LATAMSARC (a group studying sarcomas consisting of different centers in various countries in Latin America, including Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru). Adult patients (≥18 years) with retroperitoneal sarcoma who underwent surgery at six cancer centers in Latin America were included. Key outcomes were practice patterns, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

In this retrospective study, 333 patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcomas met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The cohort consisted of 157 females (42.3 %) and 176 males (57.7 %), with an average age of 53.9 years (SD 13.37). Histology most commonly included Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma (31.5 %), Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma (29.7 %), and Leiomyosarcoma (9.9 %). The tumors predominantly resided in the retroperitoneum (81.7 %) and showed a mean diameter of 23.53 cm (SD 13.8 cm). Surgical interventions varied, with Complete Compartmental Resection performed in 31.2 % of cases and Simple Complete Resection in 29.4 %. Postoperative complications were documented, with Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3 complications occurring in 16.8 % of patients. An R0/1 resection was obtained in 91.6 % of cases. The ICU admission rate post-surgery was 18.6 %. Adjuvant treatments included radiotherapy in 8.1 %. Local recurrence occurred in 20.7 % of cases, with the majority being ipsilateral. Distal recurrence was observed in 15 patients, predominantly affecting the liver. The mean overall survival was 65.5 months, and disease-free survival was 47.0 months.

Conclusion

This study provides information on the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and outcomes of retroperitoneal sarcomas in a group of reference centers in Latin America. These results represent Latin America's largest body of evidence on retroperitoneal sarcomas.
背景和目的腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)是一种罕见肿瘤,有几种明确的组织学亚型。这项研究旨在评估拉丁美洲腹膜后肉瘤患者的流行病学、治疗模式和预后,并分析在参考中心接受治疗的大量患者的复发模式和治疗差异。方法这项回顾性描述性研究利用了 LATAMSARC(一个研究肉瘤的团体,由拉丁美洲多个国家的不同中心组成,包括阿根廷、智利、哥斯达黎加、墨西哥和秘鲁)的电子病历数据库。研究对象包括在拉丁美洲六个癌症中心接受手术的腹膜后肉瘤成年患者(≥18 岁)。结果在这项回顾性研究中,333 名确诊为腹膜后肉瘤的患者符合纳入/排除标准。其中女性157人(42.3%),男性176人(57.7%),平均年龄53.9岁(标清13.37岁)。组织学上最常见的肿瘤包括低分化脂肪肉瘤(31.5%)、高分化脂肪肉瘤(29.7%)和雷米肉瘤(9.9%)。肿瘤主要位于腹膜后(81.7%),平均直径为 23.53 厘米(标清 13.8 厘米)。手术干预方式各不相同,31.2%的病例进行了完全腔室切除术,29.4%的病例进行了简单完全切除术。术后并发症记录在案,16.8%的患者出现了克拉维恩-丁度(Clavien-Dindo)≥3级并发症。91.6%的病例获得了R0/1切除。术后入住重症监护室的比例为18.6%。8.1%的患者接受了放疗等辅助治疗。20.7%的病例出现局部复发,其中大多数为同侧复发。15例患者出现远端复发,主要累及肝脏。平均总生存期为 65.5 个月,无病生存期为 47.0 个月。 结论:这项研究提供了拉丁美洲一组参考中心腹膜后肉瘤的流行病学、治疗模式和结果。这些结果是拉丁美洲关于腹膜后肉瘤的最大证据库。
{"title":"Variability in treatment approaches, outcomes, and recurrence patterns after curative intent treatment for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas in Latin America: A report on 333 patients from LATAMSARC collaborative working group","authors":"Dorian Yarih García-Ortega ,&nbsp;Sergio Damian Quildrian ,&nbsp;Nicolas A. Devaud ,&nbsp;Catherine Sarre-Lazcano ,&nbsp;Diana Otero Norza ,&nbsp;Paul Adriazola Vicente","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100103","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100103","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors with several well-defined histologic subtypes. This study aimed to assess the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma in Latin America and analyze patterns of recurrence and treatment variations in a large population of patients treated at reference centers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective descriptive study utilized an electronic database of medical records from LATAMSARC (a group studying sarcomas consisting of different centers in various countries in Latin America, including Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru). Adult patients (≥18 years) with retroperitoneal sarcoma who underwent surgery at six cancer centers in Latin America were included. Key outcomes were practice patterns, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In this retrospective study, 333 patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcomas met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The cohort consisted of 157 females (42.3 %) and 176 males (57.7 %), with an average age of 53.9 years (SD 13.37). Histology most commonly included Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma (31.5 %), Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma (29.7 %), and Leiomyosarcoma (9.9 %). The tumors predominantly resided in the retroperitoneum (81.7 %) and showed a mean diameter of 23.53 cm (SD 13.8 cm). Surgical interventions varied, with Complete Compartmental Resection performed in 31.2 % of cases and Simple Complete Resection in 29.4 %. Postoperative complications were documented, with Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3 complications occurring in 16.8 % of patients. An R0/1 resection was obtained in 91.6 % of cases. The ICU admission rate post-surgery was 18.6 %. Adjuvant treatments included radiotherapy in 8.1 %. Local recurrence occurred in 20.7 % of cases, with the majority being ipsilateral. Distal recurrence was observed in 15 patients, predominantly affecting the liver. The mean overall survival was 65.5 months, and disease-free survival was 47.0 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides information on the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and outcomes of retroperitoneal sarcomas in a group of reference centers in Latin America. These results represent Latin America's largest body of evidence on retroperitoneal sarcomas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142417400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) a surgical disease? A large healthcare system review 胰腺腺鳞癌 (PASC) 是一种外科疾病吗?大型医疗保健系统回顾
Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100102
Kyuseok Im, Niharika Kareddy, Vikas Satyananda, Victoria V. O’Connor
<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pancreatic cancer represents an increasing cause of cancer-related deaths. Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare subtype of pancreas cancer. Optimal treatment is not well-defined. This review aims to provide a detailed analysis of the natural history, management, and outcomes of the patients with PASC within a single large healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A large healthcare database was used to retrospectively identify all patients with histological diagnosis of PASC from 2010 to 2020. The cohort was evaluated as a whole and according to the following management modalities: operative, non-metastatic non-operative, and patients with metastatic disease. Abstracted data included patient characteristics, oncologic characteristics at presentation, and details of surgical and non-surgical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 60 patients with PASC were identified. All patients had confirmed histopathological diagnosis of PASC. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 70.9 years, and 28 patients were male (46.7 %). Most patients presented with pancreas head tumors (60 %). Thirty-four patients presented with non-metastatic disease (56.6 %). The operative group consisted of 17 patients (28.3 %). Most patients received adjuvant systemic therapy (70.6 %). Majority of patients experienced recurrence (76.5 %), with median time to recurrence at 6.5 months. Median overall survival in the operative group was 19.1 months. Seventeen patients with non-metastatic disease (28.3 %) did not undergo resection. Median overall survival of this cohort was 3.3 months. Systemic chemotherapy was used in 8 patients. Approximately half of patients with non-metastatic disease (9/17) did not receive any treatment due to rapid physical deterioration or poor functional status at baseline. Median survival for the non-treatment group was 1.7 months. At presentation, 26 patients (43.3 %) had metastatic disease. Most common site of metastasis was the liver. Median survival for patients with metastatic disease was 3.1 months.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>PASC is a distinct entity from glandular PDAC, and it appears to be a more aggressive disease process. Complete resection confers survival benefit but is not curative. Furthermore, few patients undergo surgery, even with seemingly resectable disease. Systemic therapy administration is limited in many patients due to physiologic decline. Dismal clinical course and poor survival is universal among all patients who do not undergo any treatment modality, regardless of metastatic status. Globally grim prognosis appears to be due early systemic effects, disease progression and lack of effective systemic therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PASC remains a poorly understood cancer and portends particularly poor prognosis. It is associated with a rapid clinical decline, poor response to systemic therapy, early recurrence, an
导言胰腺癌在癌症相关死亡病例中的比例不断上升。胰腺腺鳞癌(PASC)是一种罕见的胰腺癌亚型。最佳治疗方法尚未明确。本综述旨在详细分析一个大型医疗保健系统中胰腺腺鳞癌患者的自然病史、管理和预后。根据以下管理模式对队列进行整体评估:手术、非转移性非手术和转移性疾病患者。摘录的数据包括患者特征、发病时的肿瘤学特征以及手术和非手术治疗的详情。所有患者均经组织病理学确诊为 PASC。确诊时的平均年龄为 70.9 岁,28 名患者为男性(占 46.7%)。大多数患者为胰腺头部肿瘤(60%)。34名患者为非转移性疾病(56.6%)。手术组有 17 名患者(28.3%)。大多数患者接受了辅助系统治疗(70.6%)。大多数患者复发(76.5%),中位复发时间为6.5个月。手术组的中位总生存期为 19.1 个月。17名非转移性疾病患者(28.3%)没有接受切除手术。该组患者的中位总生存期为 3.3 个月。8名患者接受了全身化疗。约有一半的非转移性疾病患者(9/17)因身体状况迅速恶化或基线功能状态不佳而未接受任何治疗。未接受治疗组的中位生存期为 1.7 个月。有 26 名患者(43.3%)在发病时患有转移性疾病。最常见的转移部位是肝脏。转移性疾病患者的中位生存期为 3.1 个月。讨论PASC 是一种不同于腺性 PDAC 的疾病,它似乎是一种更具侵袭性的疾病过程。完全切除可提高生存率,但并不能根治。此外,即使是看似可切除的疾病,也很少有患者接受手术治疗。由于生理机能下降,许多患者的全身治疗受到限制。所有未接受任何治疗方式的患者,无论是否处于转移状态,其临床病程和生存率都很低。在全球范围内,预后不良似乎是由于早期全身效应、疾病进展和缺乏有效的全身治疗所致。它与临床病情迅速恶化、对全身治疗反应差、早期复发和总生存率低有关。然而,通过手术和化疗进行治疗可最好地延长患者的生存期。在这项研究中,我们对 60 名 PASC 患者进行了评估。胰腺腺鳞癌是一种全身性疾病,其特点是临床衰退快、对全身治疗反应差、复发早、生存率低。尽管进行了切除或全身治疗,但患者很快就会死亡。
{"title":"Is pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) a surgical disease? A large healthcare system review","authors":"Kyuseok Im,&nbsp;Niharika Kareddy,&nbsp;Vikas Satyananda,&nbsp;Victoria V. O’Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100102","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100102","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Pancreatic cancer represents an increasing cause of cancer-related deaths. Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare subtype of pancreas cancer. Optimal treatment is not well-defined. This review aims to provide a detailed analysis of the natural history, management, and outcomes of the patients with PASC within a single large healthcare system.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Materials and methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A large healthcare database was used to retrospectively identify all patients with histological diagnosis of PASC from 2010 to 2020. The cohort was evaluated as a whole and according to the following management modalities: operative, non-metastatic non-operative, and patients with metastatic disease. Abstracted data included patient characteristics, oncologic characteristics at presentation, and details of surgical and non-surgical treatment.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In total, 60 patients with PASC were identified. All patients had confirmed histopathological diagnosis of PASC. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 70.9 years, and 28 patients were male (46.7 %). Most patients presented with pancreas head tumors (60 %). Thirty-four patients presented with non-metastatic disease (56.6 %). The operative group consisted of 17 patients (28.3 %). Most patients received adjuvant systemic therapy (70.6 %). Majority of patients experienced recurrence (76.5 %), with median time to recurrence at 6.5 months. Median overall survival in the operative group was 19.1 months. Seventeen patients with non-metastatic disease (28.3 %) did not undergo resection. Median overall survival of this cohort was 3.3 months. Systemic chemotherapy was used in 8 patients. Approximately half of patients with non-metastatic disease (9/17) did not receive any treatment due to rapid physical deterioration or poor functional status at baseline. Median survival for the non-treatment group was 1.7 months. At presentation, 26 patients (43.3 %) had metastatic disease. Most common site of metastasis was the liver. Median survival for patients with metastatic disease was 3.1 months.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Discussion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;PASC is a distinct entity from glandular PDAC, and it appears to be a more aggressive disease process. Complete resection confers survival benefit but is not curative. Furthermore, few patients undergo surgery, even with seemingly resectable disease. Systemic therapy administration is limited in many patients due to physiologic decline. Dismal clinical course and poor survival is universal among all patients who do not undergo any treatment modality, regardless of metastatic status. Globally grim prognosis appears to be due early systemic effects, disease progression and lack of effective systemic therapy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;PASC remains a poorly understood cancer and portends particularly poor prognosis. It is associated with a rapid clinical decline, poor response to systemic therapy, early recurrence, an","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142417399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic inflammatory markers: Predictors of survival in mucinous appendix cancer patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy 全身炎症标志物:接受细胞切除手术和腹腔热化疗的粘液性阑尾癌患者的生存预测指标
Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100101
Sergei Iugai, Vadim Gushchin, Mary Caitlin King, Vladislav Kovalik, Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga, Carol Nieroda, Armando Sardi

Introduction

Inflammatory markers have been investigated as predictors of prognosis in various malignancies, but their role in mucinous appendix cancer (MAC) remains controversial. We evaluated the association between complete blood count-derived markers and survival in MAC patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a single-center database (1998–2023) including newly diagnosed MAC patients who underwent complete (CC-0/1) CRS/HIPEC. Preoperative values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR, platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated. For markers strongly associated with survival, we used time-dependent ROC analysis to define cutoffs to predict 5-year overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method with and Cox regression were employed for survival analysis.

Results

Of 626 CRS/HIPEC cases, 211 were eligible. NLR (p=0.049), dNLR (p=0.049), and MLR (p<0.001) were significantly associated with OS, while PLR was not. MLR demonstrated the strongest prognostic power (AUC=0.682) with the optimal cut-off 0.29. There were no significant differences in age, grade, or peritoneal cancer index (PCI) between patients with MLR<0.29 and MLR≥0.29. Five-year progression-free (PFS) and OS were 72.2 % and 83.2 % for MLR<0.29 and 54.2 % and 66.6 % for MLR≥0.29, respectively. After adjusting for age, PCI, and grade, MLR≥0.29 was associated with worse 3-year PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74, 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1.02–2.97, p=0.044) and 3-year and 5-year OS (HR 1.87, 95 %CI: 1.00–3.47, p=0.049).

Conclusion

MLR has emerged as an independent predictor of survival in MAC patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Along with other prognostic factors, MLR≥0.29 may be potentially used for preoperative risk stratification.
导言炎症标志物已被研究用于预测各种恶性肿瘤的预后,但它们在粘液性阑尾癌(MAC)中的作用仍存在争议。我们评估了接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗(CRS/HIPEC)的粘液性阑尾癌患者全血细胞计数衍生标志物与生存率之间的关系。方法我们对单中心数据库(1998-2023 年)进行了回顾性分析,其中包括接受完全(CC-0/1)CRS/HIPEC 的新诊断粘液性阑尾癌患者。我们计算了术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、衍生 NLR、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)。对于与存活率密切相关的标志物,我们使用时间依赖性 ROC 分析来定义预测 5 年总存活率(OS)的临界值。结果 在 626 例 CRS/HIPEC 病例中,有 211 例符合条件。NLR(p=0.049)、dNLR(p=0.049)和MLR(p<0.001)与OS显著相关,而PLR与OS无关。MLR 的预后能力最强(AUC=0.682),最佳临界值为 0.29。MLR<0.29和MLR≥0.29的患者在年龄、等级或腹膜癌指数(PCI)方面没有明显差异。MLR<0.29患者的五年无进展(PFS)和OS分别为72.2%和83.2%,MLR≥0.29患者的五年无进展(PFS)和OS分别为54.2%和66.6%。在调整年龄、PCI和分级后,MLR≥0.29与较差的3年PFS(危险比[HR]1.74,95%置信区间[CI]:1.02-2.97,P=0.044)和3年及5年OS(HR 1.87,95%CI:1.00-3.47,P=0.049)相关。与其他预后因素一起,MLR≥0.29可用于术前风险分层。
{"title":"Systemic inflammatory markers: Predictors of survival in mucinous appendix cancer patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy","authors":"Sergei Iugai,&nbsp;Vadim Gushchin,&nbsp;Mary Caitlin King,&nbsp;Vladislav Kovalik,&nbsp;Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga,&nbsp;Carol Nieroda,&nbsp;Armando Sardi","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100101","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100101","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Inflammatory markers have been investigated as predictors of prognosis in various malignancies, but their role in mucinous appendix cancer (MAC) remains controversial. We evaluated the association between complete blood count-derived markers and survival in MAC patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of a single-center database (1998–2023) including newly diagnosed MAC patients who underwent complete (CC-0/1) CRS/HIPEC. Preoperative values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR, platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated. For markers strongly associated with survival, we used time-dependent ROC analysis to define cutoffs to predict 5-year overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method with and Cox regression were employed for survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 626 CRS/HIPEC cases, 211 were eligible. NLR (p=0.049), dNLR (p=0.049), and MLR (p&lt;0.001) were significantly associated with OS, while PLR was not. MLR demonstrated the strongest prognostic power (AUC=0.682) with the optimal cut-off 0.29. There were no significant differences in age, grade, or peritoneal cancer index (PCI) between patients with MLR&lt;0.29 and MLR≥0.29. Five-year progression-free (PFS) and OS were 72.2 % and 83.2 % for MLR&lt;0.29 and 54.2 % and 66.6 % for MLR≥0.29, respectively. After adjusting for age, PCI, and grade, MLR≥0.29 was associated with worse 3-year PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74, 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1.02–2.97, p=0.044) and 3-year and 5-year OS (HR 1.87, 95 %CI: 1.00–3.47, p=0.049).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MLR has emerged as an independent predictor of survival in MAC patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Along with other prognostic factors, MLR≥0.29 may be potentially used for preoperative risk stratification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142432011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions 晚期肝细胞癌中肝脏导向疗法和免疫疗法的结合:综述与未来方向
Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100100
Pranav Kumar , Chase J. Wehrle , Keyue Sun , Chunbao Jiao , Rebecca Panconesi , Mingyi Zhang , Noah X. Tocci , Hanna Hong , Abby Gross , Erlind Allkushi , Maureen Whitsett Linganna , Andrea Schlegel , Toms Augustin , Charles Miller , David CH Kwon , Kazunari Sasaki , Federico Aucejo
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly morbid tumor with diverse genomic heterogeneity that poses a major therapeutic barrier. Systemic immunotherapy is often considered in the treatment of advanced HCC, but immunotherapy has been limited by high rates of resistance and immune evasion. Newer studies have explored the combination of locoregional treatments (LRTs), a common approach to intermediate-stage HCC or as a bridge to transplant, with immunotherapy. This review explores the current evidence regarding combination systemic immunotherapy with locoregional transarterial, ablation, and histotripsy modalities, as well as leading theories on the mechanism of their synergistic effects. Combinations of transarterial or ablative therapy with multikinase (MKIs) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been linked to prolonged survival and delayed tumor progression/recurrence, though treatment-induced adverse effects remain an important consideration. Ablation and histotripsy may augment the efficacy of immunotherapy through the abscopal effect, in which subsequent immune response to local tumor destruction may enhance immunogenic cell death, even in satellite, untreated lesions. Newer management strategies may utilize circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for improved surveillance and early detection of recurrence.
肝细胞癌(HCC)是一种发病率很高的肿瘤,具有多种基因组异质性,是治疗的一大障碍。在治疗晚期 HCC 时,通常会考虑全身免疫疗法,但免疫疗法一直受到高耐药性和免疫逃避率的限制。较新的研究探讨了局部区域治疗(LRTs)与免疫疗法的结合,局部区域治疗是治疗中晚期HCC或作为移植桥梁的一种常用方法。本综述探讨了系统性免疫疗法与局部经动脉治疗、消融治疗和组织切碎术等方法联合应用的现有证据,以及有关其协同作用机制的主要理论。经动脉或消融疗法与多激酶(MKIs)或免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的联合治疗与延长生存期和延缓肿瘤进展/复发有关,但治疗引起的不良反应仍是一个重要的考虑因素。消融和组织切碎术可能会通过缺席效应增强免疫疗法的疗效,在缺席效应中,对局部肿瘤破坏的后续免疫反应可能会增强免疫原性细胞死亡,甚至在未治疗的卫星病灶中也是如此。新的治疗策略可能会利用循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)来改善监测和早期发现复发。
{"title":"Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions","authors":"Pranav Kumar ,&nbsp;Chase J. Wehrle ,&nbsp;Keyue Sun ,&nbsp;Chunbao Jiao ,&nbsp;Rebecca Panconesi ,&nbsp;Mingyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Noah X. Tocci ,&nbsp;Hanna Hong ,&nbsp;Abby Gross ,&nbsp;Erlind Allkushi ,&nbsp;Maureen Whitsett Linganna ,&nbsp;Andrea Schlegel ,&nbsp;Toms Augustin ,&nbsp;Charles Miller ,&nbsp;David CH Kwon ,&nbsp;Kazunari Sasaki ,&nbsp;Federico Aucejo","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100100","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100100","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly morbid tumor with diverse genomic heterogeneity that poses a major therapeutic barrier. Systemic immunotherapy is often considered in the treatment of advanced HCC, but immunotherapy has been limited by high rates of resistance and immune evasion. Newer studies have explored the combination of locoregional treatments (LRTs), a common approach to intermediate-stage HCC or as a bridge to transplant, with immunotherapy. This review explores the current evidence regarding combination systemic immunotherapy with locoregional transarterial, ablation, and histotripsy modalities, as well as leading theories on the mechanism of their synergistic effects. Combinations of transarterial or ablative therapy with multikinase (MKIs) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been linked to prolonged survival and delayed tumor progression/recurrence, though treatment-induced adverse effects remain an important consideration. Ablation and histotripsy may augment the efficacy of immunotherapy through the abscopal effect, in which subsequent immune response to local tumor destruction may enhance immunogenic cell death, even in satellite, untreated lesions. Newer management strategies may utilize circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for improved surveillance and early detection of recurrence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142357650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immunotherapy in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: What is the state of management? 胃食管腺癌的免疫疗法:管理现状如何?
Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100099
Katherine M. Bever

Introduction and design

This review summarizes clinical data available that supports the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). and current approvals as well as current and emerging biomarkers to guide patient selection for this approach. Included in this review is an assessment of clinical data in advanced/metastatic GEA and resectable GEA as well as biomarkers of response to ICIs in GEA, including mismatch repair deficiency, PDL1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and Epstein-Barr virus.

Results and conclusion

ICIs are active in GEA and both nivolumab and pembrolizumab are approved in in the front-line metastatic setting in combination with chemotherapy. Other ICIs are in development. Incorporation of ICI with chemotherapy appears to improve pathologic response rates in the resectable setting; however, longer term follow up is needed to confirm a survival benefit from this approach.
简介和设计本综述总结了支持使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗胃食管腺癌(GEA)的现有临床数据、目前的批准情况以及指导患者选择这种方法的现有和新兴生物标志物。本综述评估了晚期/转移性胃食管腺癌和可切除胃食管腺癌的临床数据,以及胃食管腺癌患者对 ICIs 反应的生物标志物,包括错配修复缺陷、PDL1 表达、肿瘤突变负荷和 Epstein-Barr 病毒。其他 ICIs 正在开发中。在可切除病例中,将 ICI 与化疗结合使用似乎可以提高病理反应率;但是,需要进行长期随访,以确认这种方法是否能提高生存率。
{"title":"Immunotherapy in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: What is the state of management?","authors":"Katherine M. Bever","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100099","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100099","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and design</h3><div>This review summarizes clinical data available that supports the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). and current approvals as well as current and emerging biomarkers to guide patient selection for this approach. Included in this review is an assessment of clinical data in advanced/metastatic GEA and resectable GEA as well as biomarkers of response to ICIs in GEA, including mismatch repair deficiency, PDL1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and Epstein-Barr virus.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><div>ICIs are active in GEA and both nivolumab and pembrolizumab are approved in in the front-line metastatic setting in combination with chemotherapy. Other ICIs are in development. Incorporation of ICI with chemotherapy appears to improve pathologic response rates in the resectable setting; however, longer term follow up is needed to confirm a survival benefit from this approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142417401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound 乳腺活组织检查和腋窝超声检查的时间不会影响腋窝超声检查的假阳性率
Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100098
Gregory Stimac , Aryana Jones , Faryal Afridi , Georgia Vasilakis , Madison Miranda , Rebecca Norcini , Kristin Lupinacci , Michael S. Cowher

Background

The determination of axillary lymph node metastases is an important component of breast cancer treatment planning. Lymph node biopsies can be performed simultaneously with breast biopsy or at a later time. However, a post-breast biopsy ultrasound of the axilla may appear abnormal due to reactivity in the axillary lymph nodes. This study examined the timing of the axillary ultrasound (AUS) in relation to a breast biopsy to determine if it would affect patient management.

Methods

All newly diagnosed breast cancers from 2016 to 2017 were analyzed. We analyzed the timing of breast abnormality diagnosis, breast ultrasound, breast biopsy, AUS, and the AUS biopsy (AUSBx). An interval AUS was considered one that was not performed on the same day as a breast biopsy. True positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false negative (FN) values were calculated. Chi-square analysis and Fisher exact test were performed on categorical data, and a student’s t-test was performed for continuous variables. Significance was determined to be p < 0.05.

Results

Same-day TP and FP AUS rates were 66.5 % and 33.5 %, respectively, and interval TP and FP AUS rates were 60.1 % and 39.9 %, respectively (p = 0.4708). The same-day TN and FN AUS rates were 90.6 % and 9.4 %, respectively, and interval TN and FN rates were 82.4 % and 17.6 %, respectively (p = 0.3917).

Conclusion

Overall TP, FP, TN, and FN rates did not differ between patients who received same-day or interval AUS studies.
背景确定腋窝淋巴结转移是乳腺癌治疗计划的重要组成部分。淋巴结活检可与乳腺活检同时进行,也可稍后进行。然而,乳腺活检后的腋窝超声检查可能会因腋窝淋巴结的反应性而出现异常。本研究研究了腋窝超声(AUS)与乳腺活检的时间关系,以确定其是否会影响患者的管理。方法分析了2016年至2017年所有新诊断的乳腺癌患者。我们分析了乳腺异常诊断、乳腺超声、乳腺活检、AUS和AUS活检(AUSBx)的时间。间隔 AUS 被视为未与乳腺活检在同一天进行。计算真阳性(TP)、假阳性(FP)、真阴性(TN)和假阴性(FN)值。对分类数据进行卡方分析和费雪精确检验,对连续变量进行学生 t 检验。结果当天的 TP 和 FP AUS 率分别为 66.5 % 和 33.5 %,间隔期的 TP 和 FP AUS 率分别为 60.1 % 和 39.9 %(p = 0.4708)。结论接受当天或间隔 AUS 研究的患者的总体 TP、FP、TN 和 FN 率没有差异。
{"title":"Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound","authors":"Gregory Stimac ,&nbsp;Aryana Jones ,&nbsp;Faryal Afridi ,&nbsp;Georgia Vasilakis ,&nbsp;Madison Miranda ,&nbsp;Rebecca Norcini ,&nbsp;Kristin Lupinacci ,&nbsp;Michael S. Cowher","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100098","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100098","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The determination of axillary lymph node metastases is an important component of breast cancer treatment planning. Lymph node biopsies can be performed simultaneously with breast biopsy or at a later time. However, a post-breast biopsy ultrasound of the axilla may appear abnormal due to reactivity in the axillary lymph nodes. This study examined the timing of the axillary ultrasound (AUS) in relation to a breast biopsy to determine if it would affect patient management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All newly diagnosed breast cancers from 2016 to 2017 were analyzed. We analyzed the timing of breast abnormality diagnosis, breast ultrasound, breast biopsy, AUS, and the AUS biopsy (AUSBx). An interval AUS was considered one that was not performed on the same day as a breast biopsy. True positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false negative (FN) values were calculated. Chi-square analysis and Fisher exact test were performed on categorical data, and a student’s t-test was performed for continuous variables. Significance was determined to be p &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Same-day TP and FP AUS rates were 66.5 % and 33.5 %, respectively, and interval TP and FP AUS rates were 60.1 % and 39.9 %, respectively (p = 0.4708). The same-day TN and FN AUS rates were 90.6 % and 9.4 %, respectively, and interval TN and FN rates were 82.4 % and 17.6 %, respectively (p = 0.3917).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall TP, FP, TN, and FN rates did not differ between patients who received same-day or interval AUS studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142357558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 小肠癌:2005-2020 年加拿大安大略省基于人口的流行病学、治疗和结果分析
Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100096
Sean Bennett , Brooke E. Wilson , Nan Chen , Weidong Kong , Sunil V. Patel , Christopher M. Booth , Shaila J. Merchant

Introduction

Small bowel cancers are uncommon malignancies comprised of several histologies with variable treatments and prognoses. The current study describes the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of a large, population-based cohort of patients with small bowel cancers.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative healthcare data from Ontario, Canada. Patients diagnosed with a small bowel cancer between 2005–2020 were included. Trends in incidence, treatments, and survival were explored by histology (adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and lymphoma).

Results

A total of 5306 patients with small bowel cancers were identified. The most common histologies were NET (40.5 %) and adenocarcinoma (31.6 %). Over the study period the annual incidence of small bowel cancers increased from 1.54 to 2.78 per 100 000 and the likelihoods of receiving surgery and systemic therapy within one year of diagnosis both increased for all histologic subtypes except lymphoma. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 1.0 year for adenocarcinoma, 13.2 years for NET, 14.2 years for GIST, and 10.1 years for lymphoma. There was no trend towards improved median survival for adenocarcinoma by year of diagnosis; 0.94 years (2005–2010), 1.07 years (2011–2015), and 0.98 years (2016–2020).

Discussion

Small bowel cancers are increasing in incidence, with increasing use of surgery and systemic therapies. While survival is favourable for many small bowel cancers, it remains poor for adenocarcinoma. Better availability of cancer stage data and detailed histopathology within the database would facilitate future research.

Synopsis

This study of small bowel cancer in Ontario from 2005 to 2020 demonstrated increasing incidence, use of surgery, and systemic treatments. The most common histologies are neuroendocrine tumors and adenocarcinoma, with median survivals of 13.2 and 1.0 years respectively.

导言小肠癌是一种不常见的恶性肿瘤,由多种组织结构组成,治疗方法和预后各不相同。本研究描述了一个基于人群的大型小肠癌患者队列的流行病学、治疗和预后情况。方法我们利用加拿大安大略省的相关行政医疗数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究纳入了 2005-2020 年间确诊的小肠癌患者。按组织学(腺癌、神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)、胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)和淋巴瘤)探讨了发病率、治疗和生存趋势。最常见的组织类型是NET(40.5%)和腺癌(31.6%)。在研究期间,小肠癌的年发病率从每十万人中 1.54 例增加到 2.78 例,除淋巴瘤外,所有组织学亚型的患者在确诊后一年内接受手术和系统治疗的几率都有所增加。腺癌确诊后的中位总生存期为 1.0 年,NET 为 13.2 年,GIST 为 14.2 年,淋巴瘤为 10.1 年。腺癌的中位生存期没有按诊断年份提高的趋势:0.94 年(2005-2010 年)、1.07 年(2011-2015 年)和 0.98 年(2016-2020 年)。虽然许多小肠癌的生存率较高,但腺癌的生存率仍然较低。这项关于 2005 年至 2020 年安大略省小肠癌的研究表明,小肠癌的发病率、手术和系统治疗的使用率都在上升。最常见的组织类型是神经内分泌肿瘤和腺癌,中位生存期分别为 13.2 年和 1.0 年。
{"title":"Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020","authors":"Sean Bennett ,&nbsp;Brooke E. Wilson ,&nbsp;Nan Chen ,&nbsp;Weidong Kong ,&nbsp;Sunil V. Patel ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Booth ,&nbsp;Shaila J. Merchant","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100096","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100096","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Small bowel cancers are uncommon malignancies comprised of several histologies with variable treatments and prognoses. The current study describes the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of a large, population-based cohort of patients with small bowel cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative healthcare data from Ontario, Canada. Patients diagnosed with a small bowel cancer between 2005–2020 were included. Trends in incidence, treatments, and survival were explored by histology (adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and lymphoma).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 5306 patients with small bowel cancers were identified. The most common histologies were NET (40.5 %) and adenocarcinoma (31.6 %). Over the study period the annual incidence of small bowel cancers increased from 1.54 to 2.78 per 100 000 and the likelihoods of receiving surgery and systemic therapy within one year of diagnosis both increased for all histologic subtypes except lymphoma. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 1.0 year for adenocarcinoma, 13.2 years for NET, 14.2 years for GIST, and 10.1 years for lymphoma. There was no trend towards improved median survival for adenocarcinoma by year of diagnosis; 0.94 years (2005–2010), 1.07 years (2011–2015), and 0.98 years (2016–2020).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Small bowel cancers are increasing in incidence, with increasing use of surgery and systemic therapies. While survival is favourable for many small bowel cancers, it remains poor for adenocarcinoma. Better availability of cancer stage data and detailed histopathology within the database would facilitate future research.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>This study of small bowel cancer in Ontario from 2005 to 2020 demonstrated increasing incidence, use of surgery, and systemic treatments. The most common histologies are neuroendocrine tumors and adenocarcinoma, with median survivals of 13.2 and 1.0 years respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024001051/pdfft?md5=73dcc6435f9f6c6d20ccd8bb1195a6b6&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024001051-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Oncology Insight
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1