首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Oncology Insight最新文献

英文 中文
Characterization of ultrarare sarcomas in a high-volume referral center in Latin America 拉丁美洲一个高容量转诊中心的罕见肉瘤特征
Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100156
Dorian Yarih Garcia-Ortega , José Antonio Ortega-Jiménez , Itzel Elizabeth Vidal-Sanchez , Ana Paulina Meléndez-Fernández , Claudia Haydee Sarai Caro-Sanchez , Sylvia Veronica Villavicencio-Valencia , Gabriela Concepción Alamilla-García , Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz

Background

Ultrarare sarcomas are a diverse group of malignancies with an incidence of less than 1 % of all sarcomas. Due to their rarity, knowledge about their biology and treatment is limited. Most data come from high-income countries, with little representation from Latin America. This study characterizes ultrarare sarcomas’ clinical and pathological features in a Latin American referral center.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume sarcoma center, including patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Histopathological diagnoses were defined by expert pathologists. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results

We included 148 patients (median age: 42 years, 54.7 % female). The most common histological subtypes were epithelioid sarcoma (19.6 %), myxo-inflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (12.8 %), and alveolar soft part sarcoma (9.5 %). Most tumors (77.7 %) were high-grade, and 22.3 % had metastases at diagnosis. Surgery was performed in 77.7 % of cases, achieving R0 resection in 51.4 %. Adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 39.9 %, and chemotherapy in 26.4 %. Overall survival was 48.2 months. Metastatic disease, high-grade tumors, and positive margins were associated with worse survival (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study highlights the heterogeneity of ultrarare sarcomas and the importance of multidisciplinary management in Latin America. Further research and collaboration are needed to improve outcomes.
背景:超少见肉瘤是一种多样化的恶性肿瘤,发病率低于1% %。由于其罕见性,对其生物学和治疗的了解有限。大多数数据来自高收入国家,很少有来自拉丁美洲的代表。本研究描述了拉丁美洲转诊中心的罕见肉瘤的临床和病理特征。方法在一个大容量肉瘤中心进行回顾性队列研究,包括2000年至2020年诊断的患者。组织病理学诊断由病理学专家确定。收集了人口统计学、临床和治疗数据。统计分析包括描述性统计和Kaplan-Meier生存分析。结果纳入148例患者(中位年龄:42岁,54.7% %为女性)。最常见的组织学亚型是上皮样肉瘤(19.6% %)、黏液炎性纤维母细胞肉瘤(12.8% %)和肺泡软组织肉瘤(9.5% %)。大多数肿瘤(77.7% %)为高级别肿瘤,22.3% %在诊断时发生转移。77.7% %的病例行手术,51.4% %的病例行R0切除。辅助放疗占39.9 %,化疗占26.4 %。总生存期为48.2个月。转移性疾病、高级别肿瘤和阳性切缘与较差的生存率相关(p <; 0.001)。结论本研究强调了拉丁美洲罕见肉瘤的异质性和多学科治疗的重要性。需要进一步的研究和合作来改善结果。
{"title":"Characterization of ultrarare sarcomas in a high-volume referral center in Latin America","authors":"Dorian Yarih Garcia-Ortega ,&nbsp;José Antonio Ortega-Jiménez ,&nbsp;Itzel Elizabeth Vidal-Sanchez ,&nbsp;Ana Paulina Meléndez-Fernández ,&nbsp;Claudia Haydee Sarai Caro-Sanchez ,&nbsp;Sylvia Veronica Villavicencio-Valencia ,&nbsp;Gabriela Concepción Alamilla-García ,&nbsp;Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100156","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100156","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ultrarare sarcomas are a diverse group of malignancies with an incidence of less than 1 % of all sarcomas. Due to their rarity, knowledge about their biology and treatment is limited. Most data come from high-income countries, with little representation from Latin America. This study characterizes ultrarare sarcomas’ clinical and pathological features in a Latin American referral center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume sarcoma center, including patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Histopathological diagnoses were defined by expert pathologists. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 148 patients (median age: 42 years, 54.7 % female). The most common histological subtypes were epithelioid sarcoma (19.6 %), myxo-inflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (12.8 %), and alveolar soft part sarcoma (9.5 %). Most tumors (77.7 %) were high-grade, and 22.3 % had metastases at diagnosis. Surgery was performed in 77.7 % of cases, achieving R0 resection in 51.4 %. Adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 39.9 %, and chemotherapy in 26.4 %. Overall survival was 48.2 months. Metastatic disease, high-grade tumors, and positive margins were associated with worse survival (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the heterogeneity of ultrarare sarcomas and the importance of multidisciplinary management in Latin America. Further research and collaboration are needed to improve outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144212436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical cancer patients’ attitudes and beliefs about cannabis at a midwest comprehensive cancer center 中西部综合癌症中心外科癌症患者对大麻的态度和信念
Pub Date : 2025-05-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100154
Kenneth F. Newcomer , Erica K. Barnell , Felicia Zhang , Joel Vetter , Evan M. Bagley , Marvin Petty , Kerri A. Ohman , William G. Hawkins

Background

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and its treatments often cause physical (e.g., pain, weight loss, vomiting) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (e.g., anxiety, poor sleep, depressed mood). Despite increasing availability of cannabis, regional patterns of use among cancer patients remain unclear, and surgeons often lack insight into patient attitudes regarding cannabis for symptom management.

Methods

Patients with GI cancer were recruited from a Midwest Comprehensive Cancer Center. The cohort included patients who had undergone surgery during treatment. A confidential survey assessed symptoms, cannabis use history, and attitudes toward cannabis for palliation. Survey methods followed the Theory of Planned Behavior, with responses measured using a Likert scale.

Results

Of the 64 survey respondents, 66 % had undergone surgery. Cancer distribution included 25 colorectal cases, 20 pancreatic cases, 8 esophagogastric cases, and 11 other cancer types. Within 30 days of survey completion, severe physical and neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported by 39 % and 24 % patients, respectively. Active cannabis use was reported by 19 %, with 90 % citing symptom relief as the primary motivation. Only half of cannabis users disclosed their use to physicians. Use barriers included cost and accessibility. Among nonusers, 67 % were interested in medicinal cannabis. Favorable views of cannabis were reported by 74 %, with younger patients reporting significantly increased positive attitudes.

Conclusions

Cannabis use among cancer patients is common. Most patients believe cannabis improves cancer-related symptoms, yet many do not discuss its use with healthcare providers. Enhanced communication could improve quality of life for patients benefiting from cannabis.

Synopsis

Cannabis use among gastrointestinal cancer patients is common, with most seeking symptom relief. Despite favorable attitudes, many patients do not disclose use to physicians. Improved communication may enhance quality of life through symptom management.
胃肠道(GI)癌及其治疗通常会引起身体(如疼痛、体重减轻、呕吐)和神经精神症状(如焦虑、睡眠不良、情绪低落)。尽管大麻的可得性越来越高,但癌症患者使用大麻的区域模式仍不清楚,外科医生往往缺乏对患者对大麻用于症状管理的态度的了解。方法从中西部综合癌症中心招募胃肠道癌患者。该队列包括在治疗期间接受手术的患者。一项保密调查评估了症状、大麻使用史和对大麻缓解的态度。调查方法遵循计划行为理论,使用李克特量表测量反应。结果在64名调查对象中,66% %接受了手术。结直肠癌25例,胰腺20例,食管胃8例,其他11例。在调查完成的30天内,分别有39% %和24% %的患者报告了严重的身体和神经精神症状。19% %报告积极使用大麻,其中90% %将缓解症状作为主要动机。只有一半的大麻使用者向医生透露了他们的使用情况。使用障碍包括成本和可及性。在非使用者中,67% %对药用大麻感兴趣。74%的人报告对大麻持积极态度 %,年轻患者报告积极态度显着增加。结论肿瘤患者普遍使用扫描抗体。大多数患者认为大麻可以改善癌症相关症状,但许多人不与医疗保健提供者讨论大麻的使用。加强沟通可以改善大麻患者的生活质量。胃肠道癌症患者使用大麻是常见的,大多数寻求症状缓解。尽管有良好的态度,但许多患者不向医生透露使用情况。改善沟通可以通过症状管理来提高生活质量。
{"title":"Surgical cancer patients’ attitudes and beliefs about cannabis at a midwest comprehensive cancer center","authors":"Kenneth F. Newcomer ,&nbsp;Erica K. Barnell ,&nbsp;Felicia Zhang ,&nbsp;Joel Vetter ,&nbsp;Evan M. Bagley ,&nbsp;Marvin Petty ,&nbsp;Kerri A. Ohman ,&nbsp;William G. Hawkins","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100154","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100154","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and its treatments often cause physical (e.g., pain, weight loss, vomiting) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (e.g., anxiety, poor sleep, depressed mood). Despite increasing availability of cannabis, regional patterns of use among cancer patients remain unclear, and surgeons often lack insight into patient attitudes regarding cannabis for symptom management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with GI cancer were recruited from a Midwest Comprehensive Cancer Center. The cohort included patients who had undergone surgery during treatment. A confidential survey assessed symptoms, cannabis use history, and attitudes toward cannabis for palliation. Survey methods followed the Theory of Planned Behavior, with responses measured using a Likert scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 64 survey respondents, 66 % had undergone surgery. Cancer distribution included 25 colorectal cases, 20 pancreatic cases, 8 esophagogastric cases, and 11 other cancer types. Within 30 days of survey completion, severe physical and neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported by 39 % and 24 % patients, respectively. Active cannabis use was reported by 19 %, with 90 % citing symptom relief as the primary motivation. Only half of cannabis users disclosed their use to physicians. Use barriers included cost and accessibility. Among nonusers, 67 % were interested in medicinal cannabis. Favorable views of cannabis were reported by 74 %, with younger patients reporting significantly increased positive attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cannabis use among cancer patients is common. Most patients believe cannabis improves cancer-related symptoms, yet many do not discuss its use with healthcare providers. Enhanced communication could improve quality of life for patients benefiting from cannabis.</div></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><div>Cannabis use among gastrointestinal cancer patients is common, with most seeking symptom relief. Despite favorable attitudes, many patients do not disclose use to physicians. Improved communication may enhance quality of life through symptom management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144205786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes following diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis deemed ineligible for cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) due to disease burden 诊断性腹腔镜检查腹膜癌患者由于疾病负担不适合进行细胞减少和腹腔内高温化疗(HIPEC)的结果
Pub Date : 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100150
Paula Marincola Smith , Ashlee Seldomridge , Yi-Ju Chiang , Michael G. White , Yun Song , Christopher Scally , Paul F. Mansfield , Keith F. Fournier , Beth A. Helmink

Introduction

While cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) can improve overall survival (OS) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer, some patients are ineligible for CRS/HIPEC due to disease burden. This paper characterizes outcomes for patients who are evaluated by diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) and deemed ineligible for CRS/HIPEC.

Methods

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent DL and deemed ineligible for CRS/HIPEC (1/1/2009–1/1/2024). Date of death was confirmed using public obituaries. Treatment course/causes of death are summarized by descriptive statistics and OS by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

124 patients were included. Median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score was 25. Median follow-up was 1.14 and median OS 1.29 years. 58 (46.8 %) died of their malignancy, 42 (33.9 %) died of unknown cause, and 24 (19.4 %) were alive at last follow-up. The most common causes of death were bowel obstruction (29, 23.4 %), multifactorial/failure to thrive (21, 16.9 %), and malignant ascites (15, 12.1 %). Patients who underwent some form of additional therapy after DL (1.43 versus 0.48 years, p < 0.001) or who enrolled in a clinical trial (1.91 versus 1.21 years, p = 0.030) had prolonged OS.

Conclusions

OS for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer who are deemed ineligible for CRS/HIPEC after DL is 1.29 years without significant variation by primary pathology, PCI, peritoneal cytology, or presence of hematogenous metastases. Patients who get some form of additional therapy following their DL have prolonged OS. The most common causes of death are bowel obstruction, failure to thrive, and malignant ascites.
虽然细胞减少手术和腹腔热化疗(CRS/HIPEC)可以提高阑尾癌或结直肠癌腹膜癌患者的总生存期(OS),但由于疾病负担,一些患者不适合进行CRS/HIPEC。本文描述了通过诊断性腹腔镜(DL)评估并认为不符合CRS/HIPEC的患者的结果。方法回顾性分析2009年1月1日至2024年1月1日行DL且不符合CRS/HIPEC条件的患者的病历。死亡日期是通过公开讣告确认的。描述性统计总结治疗过程/死亡原因,Kaplan-Meier分析总结OS。结果共纳入124例患者。腹膜癌指数(PCI)中位评分为25分。中位随访为1.14年,中位OS为1.29年。最后随访时,因恶性肿瘤死亡58例(46.8 %),死因不明42例(33.9 %),存活24例(19.4 %)。最常见的死亡原因是肠梗阻(29.4%,23.4% %)、多因素/发育不全(21.9%,16.9% %)和恶性腹水(15.1%,12.1 %)。DL后接受某种形式的额外治疗的患者(1.43年vs 0.48年,p <; 0.001)或参加临床试验的患者(1.91年vs 1.21年,p = 0.030)的OS延长。结论阑尾癌或结直肠癌腹膜癌患者在DL后被认为不适合CRS/HIPEC的so为1.29年,无原发病理、PCI、腹膜细胞学或存在血液转移的显著差异。在DL后接受某种形式的额外治疗的患者延长了OS。最常见的死亡原因是肠梗阻、发育不良和恶性腹水。
{"title":"Outcomes following diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis deemed ineligible for cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) due to disease burden","authors":"Paula Marincola Smith ,&nbsp;Ashlee Seldomridge ,&nbsp;Yi-Ju Chiang ,&nbsp;Michael G. White ,&nbsp;Yun Song ,&nbsp;Christopher Scally ,&nbsp;Paul F. Mansfield ,&nbsp;Keith F. Fournier ,&nbsp;Beth A. Helmink","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100150","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100150","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) can improve overall survival (OS) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer, some patients are ineligible for CRS/HIPEC due to disease burden. This paper characterizes outcomes for patients who are evaluated by diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) and deemed ineligible for CRS/HIPEC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent DL and deemed ineligible for CRS/HIPEC (1/1/2009–1/1/2024). Date of death was confirmed using public obituaries. Treatment course/causes of death are summarized by descriptive statistics and OS by Kaplan-Meier analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>124 patients were included. Median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score was 25. Median follow-up was 1.14 and median OS 1.29 years. 58 (46.8 %) died of their malignancy, 42 (33.9 %) died of unknown cause, and 24 (19.4 %) were alive at last follow-up. The most common causes of death were bowel obstruction (29, 23.4 %), multifactorial/failure to thrive (21, 16.9 %), and malignant ascites (15, 12.1 %). Patients who underwent some form of additional therapy after DL (1.43 versus 0.48 years, p &lt; 0.001) or who enrolled in a clinical trial (1.91 versus 1.21 years, p = 0.030) had prolonged OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OS for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer who are deemed ineligible for CRS/HIPEC after DL is 1.29 years without significant variation by primary pathology, PCI, peritoneal cytology, or presence of hematogenous metastases. Patients who get some form of additional therapy following their DL have prolonged OS. The most common causes of death are bowel obstruction, failure to thrive, and malignant ascites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144089494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancements in the surgical management of pancreatic masses: A comprehensive review 胰腺肿块手术治疗的进展:综述
Pub Date : 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100147
Cara Mohammed , Patricio Xavier Duran S , Hugh Kolomar , Tanmay Thirth , Simcha Bulmash , Sharvari Vikram Joshi , Tannia Payan Serrano , Greeshma Reddy , Turimula Arpan , Deepika Palegar Thuli , Areehah Zafar Masood , Manju Rai
Pancreatic masses encompass a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, ranging from benign lesions like serous cystadenomas to malignant entities such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Timely and accurate differentiation between these masses is critical for tailoring optimal therapeutic strategies. This narrative review highlights the evolving landscape of surgical management for pancreatic masses, emphasizing the advancements in diagnostic modalities, surgical techniques, and perioperative care. Imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), have enhanced the precision of diagnosis and staging. Histopathological evaluation remains indispensable for definitive diagnosis. Surgical interventions, including partial and total pancreatectomy, are explored based on tumor type and staging, with resection offering the only curative option for PDAC. Minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries, have demonstrated reduced morbidity, quicker recovery, and comparable oncological outcomes to open procedures. The role of neoadjuvant therapy is discussed for resectable and borderline resectable tumors, with evidence suggesting improved surgical outcomes and overall survival. The review also addresses postoperative challenges, including pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, and the management of endocrine and exocrine insufficiencies. Palliative strategies, such as biliary bypass and endoscopic stenting, are detailed for non-resectable tumors, prioritizing symptom relief and quality of life. Emerging technologies like intraoperative imaging, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine are reshaping the surgical approach, enabling personalized treatment plans. This comprehensive overview underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in optimizing outcomes for patients with pancreatic neoplasms.
胰腺肿块包括不同类型的肿瘤,从浆液性囊腺瘤等良性病变到胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)等恶性肿瘤。及时准确地区分这些肿块对于制定最佳治疗策略至关重要。这篇叙述性综述强调了胰腺肿块手术治疗的发展前景,强调了诊断方式、手术技术和围手术期护理的进步。成像方式,包括对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和内镜超声(EUS),提高了诊断和分期的准确性。组织病理学评估仍然是明确诊断不可或缺的。手术干预,包括部分和全胰切除术,根据肿瘤类型和分期进行探讨,切除是PDAC的唯一治疗选择。微创手术,如腹腔镜和机器人辅助手术,已经证明了与开放式手术相比,发病率更低,恢复更快,肿瘤预后也相当。讨论了新辅助治疗在可切除和边缘性可切除肿瘤中的作用,有证据表明可改善手术结果和总生存率。本综述还讨论了术后的挑战,包括胰瘘、胃排空延迟以及内分泌和外分泌不足的管理。姑息策略,如胆道绕道和内窥镜支架植入术,详细介绍了不可切除肿瘤,优先考虑症状缓解和生活质量。术中成像、人工智能和精准医学等新兴技术正在重塑手术方法,实现个性化治疗计划。这一全面的概述强调了多学科方法在优化胰腺肿瘤患者预后方面的重要性。
{"title":"Advancements in the surgical management of pancreatic masses: A comprehensive review","authors":"Cara Mohammed ,&nbsp;Patricio Xavier Duran S ,&nbsp;Hugh Kolomar ,&nbsp;Tanmay Thirth ,&nbsp;Simcha Bulmash ,&nbsp;Sharvari Vikram Joshi ,&nbsp;Tannia Payan Serrano ,&nbsp;Greeshma Reddy ,&nbsp;Turimula Arpan ,&nbsp;Deepika Palegar Thuli ,&nbsp;Areehah Zafar Masood ,&nbsp;Manju Rai","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100147","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100147","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pancreatic masses encompass a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, ranging from benign lesions like serous cystadenomas to malignant entities such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Timely and accurate differentiation between these masses is critical for tailoring optimal therapeutic strategies. This narrative review highlights the evolving landscape of surgical management for pancreatic masses, emphasizing the advancements in diagnostic modalities, surgical techniques, and perioperative care. Imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), have enhanced the precision of diagnosis and staging. Histopathological evaluation remains indispensable for definitive diagnosis. Surgical interventions, including partial and total pancreatectomy, are explored based on tumor type and staging, with resection offering the only curative option for PDAC. Minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries, have demonstrated reduced morbidity, quicker recovery, and comparable oncological outcomes to open procedures. The role of neoadjuvant therapy is discussed for resectable and borderline resectable tumors, with evidence suggesting improved surgical outcomes and overall survival. The review also addresses postoperative challenges, including pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, and the management of endocrine and exocrine insufficiencies. Palliative strategies, such as biliary bypass and endoscopic stenting, are detailed for non-resectable tumors, prioritizing symptom relief and quality of life. Emerging technologies like intraoperative imaging, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine are reshaping the surgical approach, enabling personalized treatment plans. This comprehensive overview underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in optimizing outcomes for patients with pancreatic neoplasms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144830319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of neighborhood socioeconomic status and ethnic diversity with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer: A population-based cohort study 社区社会经济地位和种族多样性与III期结肠癌接受辅助化疗的关系:一项基于人群的队列研究
Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100148
Adom Bondzi-Simpson , Ramy Behman , Tiago Ribeiro , Sheron Perera , Aisha Lofters , Rinku Sutradhar , Vivian Aghanya , Andrea Covelli , Rebecca A. Snyder , Callisia N. Clarke , Natalie G. Coburn , Julie Hallet

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces cancer recurrence and improves survival in eligible patients. Barriers to care may contribute to inequities in outcomes. We examined the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic diversity with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients.

Methods

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults undergoing surgery for stage III colon cancer (2007–2020). SES and ethnic diversity, defined by quintiles from census data, were the primary exposures. Outcomes were receipt of medical oncology consultation and adjuvant chemotherapy within 3 months post-surgery. Logistic regression measured the association between each exposure and outcome combination adjusting for confounders. A sub-group analysis was performed on patients who received a medical oncology consultation.

Results

Of 14,511 patients, 10,973 (76.5 %) received medical oncology consultation and 8814 (61.4 %) recieved adjuvant chemotherapy. SES and ethnic diversity were not associated with medical oncology consultation after adjusting for age, sex, surgical approach, and comorbidities. However, living in both the lowest SES and highest ethnically diverse neighborhoods were associated with lower odds of adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.62–0.80 and OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.64–0.82, respectively). These associations persisted at 6 months post-surgery. Among patients who had a medical oncology consultation, living in both the lowest SES and highest ethnically diverse neighborhoods were associated with lower odds of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Living in lower SES and higher ethnically diverse neighborhoods were independently associated with lower odds of adjuvant chemotherapy but not medical oncology consultation, highlighting disparities in outcomes for marginalized patients within a universal healthcare system.

Synopsis

We examined the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic diversity with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer in Ontario, Canada. Patients from the lowest SES or most diverse neighborhoods had a 30 % and 28 % lower odds of receiving chemotherapy, highlighting disparities within a universal healthcare system.
背景:在符合条件的患者中,辅助化疗可减少癌症复发并提高生存率。获得护理的障碍可能导致结果不公平。我们研究了社区社会经济地位(SES)和种族多样性与III期结肠癌患者接受辅助化疗之间的关系。方法对2007-2020年接受III期结肠癌手术的成年人进行一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。社会经济地位和种族多样性(根据人口普查数据按五分位数定义)是主要的暴露因素。结果:术后3个月内接受肿瘤内科会诊和辅助化疗。逻辑回归测量了每次暴露与结果组合之间的关联,调整了混杂因素。对接受肿瘤内科会诊的患者进行亚组分析。结果14511例患者中,10973例(76.5 %)接受肿瘤内科会诊,8814例(61.4 %)接受辅助化疗。在调整了年龄、性别、手术方式和合并症后,社会经济地位和种族多样性与肿瘤内科会诊无关。然而,生活在社会经济地位最低和种族多样性最高的社区与辅助化疗的几率较低相关(OR 0.70;95 % CI 0.62-0.80, OR 0.72;95 % CI分别为0.64-0.82)。这些关联在术后6个月仍然存在。在接受肿瘤医学咨询的患者中,生活在社会经济地位最低和种族多样性最高的社区的患者接受辅助化疗的几率较低。结论生活在社会经济地位较低和种族多样性较高的社区与辅助化疗的低几率独立相关,但与肿瘤医学咨询无关,突出了全民医疗保健系统中边缘化患者结局的差异。摘要:我们研究了加拿大安大略省III期结肠癌患者接受辅助化疗与社区社会经济地位(SES)和种族多样性之间的关系。来自社会经济地位最低或最多样化社区的患者接受化疗的几率要低30% %和28% %,突出了普遍医疗保健系统内的差异。
{"title":"Association of neighborhood socioeconomic status and ethnic diversity with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer: A population-based cohort study","authors":"Adom Bondzi-Simpson ,&nbsp;Ramy Behman ,&nbsp;Tiago Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Sheron Perera ,&nbsp;Aisha Lofters ,&nbsp;Rinku Sutradhar ,&nbsp;Vivian Aghanya ,&nbsp;Andrea Covelli ,&nbsp;Rebecca A. Snyder ,&nbsp;Callisia N. Clarke ,&nbsp;Natalie G. Coburn ,&nbsp;Julie Hallet","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100148","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100148","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces cancer recurrence and improves survival in eligible patients. Barriers to care may contribute to inequities in outcomes. We examined the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic diversity with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults undergoing surgery for stage III colon cancer (2007–2020). SES and ethnic diversity, defined by quintiles from census data, were the primary exposures. Outcomes were receipt of medical oncology consultation and adjuvant chemotherapy within 3 months post-surgery. Logistic regression measured the association between each exposure and outcome combination adjusting for confounders. A sub-group analysis was performed on patients who received a medical oncology consultation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 14,511 patients, 10,973 (76.5 %) received medical oncology consultation and 8814 (61.4 %) recieved adjuvant chemotherapy. SES and ethnic diversity were not associated with medical oncology consultation after adjusting for age, sex, surgical approach, and comorbidities. However, living in both the lowest SES and highest ethnically diverse neighborhoods were associated with lower odds of adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.62–0.80 and OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.64–0.82, respectively). These associations persisted at 6 months post-surgery. Among patients who had a medical oncology consultation, living in both the lowest SES and highest ethnically diverse neighborhoods were associated with lower odds of adjuvant chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Living in lower SES and higher ethnically diverse neighborhoods were independently associated with lower odds of adjuvant chemotherapy but not medical oncology consultation, highlighting disparities in outcomes for marginalized patients within a universal healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><div>We examined the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic diversity with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer in Ontario, Canada. Patients from the lowest SES or most diverse neighborhoods had a 30 % and 28 % lower odds of receiving chemotherapy, highlighting disparities within a universal healthcare system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144072744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collateral vessel formation affects long-term patency of artificial vessels: Insights from 60 cases of superior vena cava reconstruction combined with thymic tumor resection 侧支血管的形成影响人工血管的长期通畅:上腔静脉重建联合胸腺肿瘤切除60例分析
Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100151
Yongqiang Ao , Jiahao Jiang , Shuai Wang , Jian Gao , Yuansheng Zheng , Lijie Tan , Junzhen Liu , Jianyong Ding

Background

Superior vena cava (SVC) reconstruction combined with total thymic tumor resection is the standard treatment for thymic tumors invading the SVC. Long-term graft patency is a critical to surgical success and patient prognosis. This study evaluates the durability of artificial grafts and identifies factors affecting their long-term patency.

Methods

We retrospectively included 60 patients who underwent extended resection of thymic tumors combined with SVC reconstruction between March 2017 and May 2024. Graft patency and collateral vessel formation were assessed using contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance venography every 3–6 months. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without graft occlusion.

Results

Among the 60 patients, 43 underwent left brachiocephalic vein-to-right atrial appendage reconstruction, 13 had right brachiocephalic vein-to-right atrial appendage reconstruction, and 4 had bilateral reconstruction. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 91.6 %, 87.0 %, and 79.1 %, respectively. Of 51 patients with graft assessment, the graft patency rate was 88.2 %, with occlusion in six patients occurring 8–20 months postoperatively. Preoperative SVC syndrome and elevated internal jugular venous pressure during SVC clamping were significant predictors of occlusion (p = 0.031, p = 0.0002) and remained independent risk factors (p = 0.046, p = 0.014). Postoperatively observed collateral circulation was significantly associated with graft occlusion (p = 0.0075), particularly newly formed collateral vessels (p = 0.0016). Imaging revealed extensive collateral vessel development, including azygos vein and chest wall veins.

Conclusions

Total thymic tumor resection combined with SVC reconstruction provides favorable long-term survival and graft patency. Collateral vessel formation over time may compromise graft patency and eventually lead to graft occlusion.

Synopsis

This study evaluates the long-term patency of artificial grafts in SVC reconstruction for thymic tumors, identifying preoperative SVC syndrome, elevated IJVP, and newly developed collateral circulation as key factors predicting or influencing graft occlusion.
背景:上腔静脉(SVC)重建联合胸腺肿瘤全切除术是胸腺肿瘤侵犯上腔静脉的标准治疗方法。移植物的长期通畅是手术成功和患者预后的关键。本研究评估了人工移植物的耐久性,并确定了影响其长期通畅的因素。方法回顾性分析2017年3月至2024年5月期间接受胸腺肿瘤扩大切除术联合SVC重建的60例患者。每隔3-6 个月通过增强CT或磁共振血管造影评估移植物通畅度和侧支血管形成情况。比较移植物闭塞与不闭塞患者的临床特点。结果60例患者中,43例行左头臂静脉至右心房附件重建,13例行右头臂静脉至右心房附件重建,4例行双侧重建。1年、3年和5年生存率分别为91.6 %、87.0 %和79.1% %。在51例接受移植物评估的患者中,移植物通畅率为88.2% %,6例患者术后8-20个月出现闭塞。术前SVC综合征和SVC夹持期间颈内静脉压升高是发生闭塞的重要预测因素(p = 0.031,p = 0.0002),也是独立的危险因素(p = 0.046,p = 0.014)。术后侧枝循环与移植物闭塞显著相关(p = 0.0075),尤其是新形成的侧枝血管(p = 0.0016)。影像学显示广泛的侧支血管发育,包括奇静脉和胸壁静脉。结论胸腺肿瘤全切除联合SVC重建术可获得良好的长期生存和移植物通畅。随着时间的推移,侧支血管的形成可能损害移植物的通畅,最终导致移植物闭塞。本研究评估人工移植物在胸腺肿瘤SVC重建中的长期通畅性,确定术前SVC综合征、升高的IJVP和新发展的侧支循环是预测或影响移植物闭塞的关键因素。
{"title":"Collateral vessel formation affects long-term patency of artificial vessels: Insights from 60 cases of superior vena cava reconstruction combined with thymic tumor resection","authors":"Yongqiang Ao ,&nbsp;Jiahao Jiang ,&nbsp;Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Jian Gao ,&nbsp;Yuansheng Zheng ,&nbsp;Lijie Tan ,&nbsp;Junzhen Liu ,&nbsp;Jianyong Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100151","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100151","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Superior vena cava (SVC) reconstruction combined with total thymic tumor resection is the standard treatment for thymic tumors invading the SVC. Long-term graft patency is a critical to surgical success and patient prognosis. This study evaluates the durability of artificial grafts and identifies factors affecting their long-term patency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively included 60 patients who underwent extended resection of thymic tumors combined with SVC reconstruction between March 2017 and May 2024. Graft patency and collateral vessel formation were assessed using contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance venography every 3–6 months. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without graft occlusion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 60 patients, 43 underwent left brachiocephalic vein-to-right atrial appendage reconstruction, 13 had right brachiocephalic vein-to-right atrial appendage reconstruction, and 4 had bilateral reconstruction. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 91.6 %, 87.0 %, and 79.1 %, respectively. Of 51 patients with graft assessment, the graft patency rate was 88.2 %, with occlusion in six patients occurring 8–20 months postoperatively. Preoperative SVC syndrome and elevated internal jugular venous pressure during SVC clamping were significant predictors of occlusion (p = 0.031, p = 0.0002) and remained independent risk factors (p = 0.046, p = 0.014). Postoperatively observed collateral circulation was significantly associated with graft occlusion (p = 0.0075), particularly newly formed collateral vessels (p = 0.0016). Imaging revealed extensive collateral vessel development, including azygos vein and chest wall veins.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Total thymic tumor resection combined with SVC reconstruction provides favorable long-term survival and graft patency. Collateral vessel formation over time may compromise graft patency and eventually lead to graft occlusion.</div></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><div>This study evaluates the long-term patency of artificial grafts in SVC reconstruction for thymic tumors, identifying preoperative SVC syndrome, elevated IJVP, and newly developed collateral circulation as key factors predicting or influencing graft occlusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144070613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unseen burden: Exploring caregiver experiences, barriers, and facilitators in foregut cancer care 看不见的负担:探索护理人员的经验,障碍和促进前肠癌护理
Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100153
Ioannis Liapis , Jaspinder Sanghera , Michelle Holland , Ivan Herbey , Katie West , Martin J. Heslin , Krista Mehari , Larry Hearld , Smita Bhatia , Annabelle L. Fonseca

Introduction

Caregivers play a pivotal role in supporting foregut cancer patients, yet their experiences and the challenges they face are overlooked. Understanding caregivers’ experiences and the barriers and facilitators they encounter can inform interventions to improve their well-being and, ultimately, patient outcomes. This study focuses on the lived experiences and the interpersonal factors that shape the caregivers’ journeys.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with caregivers of patients with foregut cancer receiving treatment at a safety-net hospital in the Deep South. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using NVivo 14 software. Grounded theory methodology was used to guide analysis. Three co-authors independently coded the data, with intercoder agreement of above 90 %.

Results

Of the 15 caregivers interviewed, the majority were female, spouses of the patients, and resided in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. Three theme categories emerged: caregiver experiences, individual/interpersonal level barriers, and individual/interpersonal level facilitators. Caregivers expressed self-sacrifice and a strong sense of duty, describing caregiving as a priority despite personal hardships. Barriers included psychological distress, financial strain, competing responsibilities, transportation challenges, social isolation, and patient denial. Conversely, facilitators included support from family and friends, religious and spiritual practices, and engagement in support groups.

Conclusion

Caregivers of patients with foregut cancer face significant psychological and financial burden, compounded by competing responsibilities and limited social support. Interventions aimed at reducing caregiver burden and enhancing support mechanisms will improve both caregiver well-being and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on strategies that promote these facilitators and address barriers to caregiving.
护理人员在支持前肠癌患者方面发挥着关键作用,但他们的经历和面临的挑战却被忽视了。了解护理人员的经历以及他们遇到的障碍和促进因素,可以为干预措施提供信息,以改善他们的福祉,并最终改善患者的治疗结果。本研究的重点是生活经验和人际因素,塑造照顾者的旅程。方法采用半结构化访谈法,对在美国南部某安全网医院接受治疗的前肠癌患者的护理人员进行访谈。使用NVivo 14软件对访谈进行记录、转录和定性分析。采用扎根理论方法指导分析。三位共同作者独立编码数据,编码间一致性在90% %以上。结果受访的15名护理人员中,大多数是女性,患者的配偶,居住在高社会经济剥夺地区。出现了三个主题类别:照顾者体验、个人/人际层面障碍和个人/人际层面促进因素。照顾者表达了自我牺牲和强烈的责任感,尽管个人生活困难,但他们将照顾他人描述为首要任务。障碍包括心理困扰、经济压力、相互竞争的责任、交通挑战、社会孤立和患者拒绝。相反,促进者包括来自家人和朋友的支持,宗教和精神实践,以及参与支持团体。结论前肠癌患者的照护者面临着巨大的心理和经济负担,同时还面临着责任的竞争和有限的社会支持。旨在减轻护理人员负担和加强支持机制的干预措施将改善护理人员的福祉和患者的预后。未来的研究应侧重于促进这些促进因素和解决护理障碍的策略。
{"title":"Unseen burden: Exploring caregiver experiences, barriers, and facilitators in foregut cancer care","authors":"Ioannis Liapis ,&nbsp;Jaspinder Sanghera ,&nbsp;Michelle Holland ,&nbsp;Ivan Herbey ,&nbsp;Katie West ,&nbsp;Martin J. Heslin ,&nbsp;Krista Mehari ,&nbsp;Larry Hearld ,&nbsp;Smita Bhatia ,&nbsp;Annabelle L. Fonseca","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100153","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100153","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Caregivers play a pivotal role in supporting foregut cancer patients, yet their experiences and the challenges they face are overlooked. Understanding caregivers’ experiences and the barriers and facilitators they encounter can inform interventions to improve their well-being and, ultimately, patient outcomes. This study focuses on the lived experiences and the interpersonal factors that shape the caregivers’ journeys.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with caregivers of patients with foregut cancer receiving treatment at a safety-net hospital in the Deep South. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using NVivo 14 software. Grounded theory methodology was used to guide analysis. Three co-authors independently coded the data, with intercoder agreement of above 90 %.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 15 caregivers interviewed, the majority were female, spouses of the patients, and resided in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. Three theme categories emerged: caregiver experiences, individual/interpersonal level barriers, and individual/interpersonal level facilitators. Caregivers expressed self-sacrifice and a strong sense of duty, describing caregiving as a priority despite personal hardships. Barriers included psychological distress, financial strain, competing responsibilities, transportation challenges, social isolation, and patient denial. Conversely, facilitators included support from family and friends, religious and spiritual practices, and engagement in support groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Caregivers of patients with foregut cancer face significant psychological and financial burden, compounded by competing responsibilities and limited social support. Interventions aimed at reducing caregiver burden and enhancing support mechanisms will improve both caregiver well-being and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on strategies that promote these facilitators and address barriers to caregiving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144098388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single versus multiagent chemotherapy for ampullary carcinoma: A propensity matched multivariate analysis of the NCDB 壶腹癌的单药与多药化疗:NCDB的倾向匹配多变量分析
Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100149
Ethan A. Warshowsky , Dorothy Wakefield , Ryan Z. Swan , Michael Minarich

Introduction

Pancreatoduodenectomy remains the standard of care for ampullary carcinoma, however the role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. We investigated the survival benefits of single vs. multi-agent chemotherapy regimens.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with stage II or III carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater between years 2013–2020. Multi-agent usage increased dramatically in 2017, so we categorized by years 2013–2016 vs. 2017–2020. Propensity score matching was performed separately for stage II and III disease using age, race, number of comorbidities and year. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis compared overall survival by single vs. multi-agent chemotherapy for 2013–2016 and 2017–2020. Cox regression analysis examined differences by number of agents while controlling for age, race, number of comorbidities, and year.

Results

1207 patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort: 477 who received single vs. 730 who received multi-agent chemotherapy. K-M analyses demonstrated that for 2013–2016, multi-agent therapy showed a significantly longer average survival for both stage II (55.99 vs. 51.43 months) and III (55.90 vs. 50.78 months) disease (p < 0.01). Follow up for the 2017 – 2020 cohort was inadequate for accurate survival reporting. Upon multivariate analysis, a significant advantage in survival with multi-agent chemotherapy was maintained for stage II (HR: 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.14–1.82, p < 0.01) and stage III (HR: 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.09–1.83, p = 0.01) disease.

Conclusion

For resected, locally advanced ampullary cancer, multi-agent chemotherapy was found to have a significant improvement in overall survival compared to single agent chemotherapy for stage II and III disease.
胰十二指肠切除术仍然是壶腹癌的标准治疗方案,然而辅助化疗的作用尚不清楚。我们调查了单药与多药化疗方案的生存获益。方法查询国家癌症数据库(NCDB),确定2013-2020年间诊断为II期或III期壶腹癌的≥ 18岁患者。2017年,多智能体使用量急剧增加,因此我们按2013-2016年与2017 - 2020年进行分类。根据年龄、种族、合并症数量和年份分别对II期和III期疾病进行倾向评分匹配。Kaplan-Meier (K-M)分析比较了2013-2016年和2017-2020年单药和多药化疗的总生存率。Cox回归分析在控制年龄、种族、合并症数量和年份的情况下,检查了药物数量的差异。结果1207例患者纳入倾向匹配队列:477例接受单药化疗,730例接受多药化疗。K-M分析显示,2013-2016年,多药治疗显示II期(55.99个月vs 51.43个月)和III期(55.90个月vs 50.78个月)疾病的平均生存期明显延长(p <; 0.01)。2017 - 2020年队列的随访不足以获得准确的生存报告。通过多因素分析,多药化疗在II期(HR: 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.14-1.82, p <; 0.01)和III期(HR: 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.09-1.83, p = 0.01)疾病的生存中保持了显著优势。结论对于切除的局部晚期壶腹癌,与单药化疗相比,多药化疗可显著提高II期和III期疾病的总生存率。
{"title":"Single versus multiagent chemotherapy for ampullary carcinoma: A propensity matched multivariate analysis of the NCDB","authors":"Ethan A. Warshowsky ,&nbsp;Dorothy Wakefield ,&nbsp;Ryan Z. Swan ,&nbsp;Michael Minarich","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100149","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100149","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pancreatoduodenectomy remains the standard of care for ampullary carcinoma, however the role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. We investigated the survival benefits of single vs. multi-agent chemotherapy regimens.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with stage II or III carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater between years 2013–2020. Multi-agent usage increased dramatically in 2017, so we categorized by years 2013–2016 vs. 2017–2020. Propensity score matching was performed separately for stage II and III disease using age, race, number of comorbidities and year. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis compared overall survival by single vs. multi-agent chemotherapy for 2013–2016 and 2017–2020. Cox regression analysis examined differences by number of agents while controlling for age, race, number of comorbidities, and year.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1207 patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort: 477 who received single vs. 730 who received multi-agent chemotherapy. K-M analyses demonstrated that for 2013–2016, multi-agent therapy showed a significantly longer average survival for both stage II (55.99 vs. 51.43 months) and III (55.90 vs. 50.78 months) disease (p &lt; 0.01). Follow up for the 2017 – 2020 cohort was inadequate for accurate survival reporting. Upon multivariate analysis, a significant advantage in survival with multi-agent chemotherapy was maintained for stage II (HR: 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.14–1.82, p &lt; 0.01) and stage III (HR: 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.09–1.83<strong>,</strong> p = 0.01) disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For resected, locally advanced ampullary cancer, multi-agent chemotherapy was found to have a significant improvement in overall survival compared to single agent chemotherapy for stage II and III disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144070614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic impact of positive peritoneal cytology (POPEC) in gastric cancer: Multi-centre European retrospective cohort study 胃癌腹膜细胞学阳性(POPEC)对预后的影响:多中心欧洲回顾性队列研究
Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100145
Richard Owen , Swathikan Chidambaram , Khalid Shamiyah , Jessie A Elliott , Jakob Hedberg , Sivesh Kamarajah , Frederik Klevebro , Marcel Andre Schneider , Lana Fourie , Christian Gutschow , Magnus Nilsson , Ewen Griffiths , Ricardo Rosati , Javed Sultan , Manuel Pera , Peter Grimminger , Guillaume Piessen , Clarisse Eveno , Jelle Ruurda , Richard van Hillegersberg , John Saunders

Objective

Positive peritoneal cytology is traditionally viewed as representative of metastatic disease and a poor prognostic factor. The objective of this multi-center study was to define the prognostic role of peritoneal cytology in curative gastrectomy, evaluate international variation in cytology sampling, and assess the impact on positive peritoneal cytology yields.

Methods

This was a multi-center international retrospective cohort study of 16 tertiary gastric cancer centers. Adult patients who underwent peritoneal lavage cytology at staging laparoscopy and subsequent gastrectomy between 2009 and 2023 were included. The primary outcome measure was overall survival at five years. Multivariable Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % CIs, adjusted for relevant confounding factors.

Results

837 patients with no radiological or macroscopic M1 disease were included, with a mean age of 66 (IQR 58–73) and 71 % were male. Non-distal gastric cancer was most common (47 %), with 59 % and 43 % of tumors staged pT3/4 and pN2/3, respectively. 66 patients (7.9 %) had positive cytology. Positive cytology was not associated with overall survival in multivariable analysis, controlled for stage and neoadjuvant treatment (HR=1.0; 95 %CI 0.51–2.0). Higher T and N stages were associated with positive cytology (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with positive cytology was variable, depending on how many quadrants were sampled.

Conclusion

Positive peritoneal cytology with otherwise M0 disease was not associated with decreased survival after curative intent gastrectomy in this study, meaning prospective study is needed. The technique of performing peritoneal washings influenced cytology yield and thus must be standardized in a much-needed prospective evaluation of peritoneal cytology.

Synopsis

The POPEC multicenter international retrospective cohort study included 837 patients receiving curative gastrectomy. This study showed the technique of performing peritoneal washings influenced cytology yield, however positive peritoneal cytology was not associated with decreased survival. Therefore, positive peritoneal cytology should not be considered an absolute contradiction to curatively intended gastrectomy.
目的腹膜细胞学阳性传统上被认为是转移性疾病的代表和预后不良的因素。这项多中心研究的目的是确定腹膜细胞学在治疗性胃切除术中的预后作用,评估细胞学采样的国际差异,并评估对腹膜细胞学阳性率的影响。方法对16个三级胃癌中心进行多中心国际回顾性队列研究。纳入了2009年至2023年间在腹腔镜分期和随后的胃切除术中接受腹膜灌洗细胞学检查的成年患者。主要结局指标是5年总生存率。多变量Cox回归提供了95 % ci的风险比(hr),校正了相关混杂因素。结果837例患者无影像学或宏观M1病变,平均年龄66岁(IQR 58-73),男性71% %。非远端胃癌最常见(47 %),分别有59 %和43 %的肿瘤分期为pT3/4和pN2/3。66例(7.9 %)细胞学阳性。在多变量分析中,细胞学阳性与分期和新辅助治疗的总生存率无关(HR=1.0;95 %可信区间0.51 - -2.0)。较高的T和N分期与细胞学阳性相关(p <; 0.001)。细胞学阳性患者的比例是可变的,这取决于采样多少象限。结论本研究中,腹膜细胞学阳性伴M0疾病与治疗性胃切除术后生存率降低无关,需要前瞻性研究。进行腹膜冲洗的技术影响细胞学的产量,因此必须在腹膜细胞学的一个急需的前瞻性评估标准化。POPEC多中心国际回顾性队列研究包括837例接受治愈性胃切除术的患者。本研究显示,腹膜冲洗技术会影响细胞学检查结果,但腹膜细胞学检查结果阳性与生存率降低无关。因此,腹膜细胞学阳性不应被认为是与治疗性胃切除术的绝对矛盾。
{"title":"Prognostic impact of positive peritoneal cytology (POPEC) in gastric cancer: Multi-centre European retrospective cohort study","authors":"Richard Owen ,&nbsp;Swathikan Chidambaram ,&nbsp;Khalid Shamiyah ,&nbsp;Jessie A Elliott ,&nbsp;Jakob Hedberg ,&nbsp;Sivesh Kamarajah ,&nbsp;Frederik Klevebro ,&nbsp;Marcel Andre Schneider ,&nbsp;Lana Fourie ,&nbsp;Christian Gutschow ,&nbsp;Magnus Nilsson ,&nbsp;Ewen Griffiths ,&nbsp;Ricardo Rosati ,&nbsp;Javed Sultan ,&nbsp;Manuel Pera ,&nbsp;Peter Grimminger ,&nbsp;Guillaume Piessen ,&nbsp;Clarisse Eveno ,&nbsp;Jelle Ruurda ,&nbsp;Richard van Hillegersberg ,&nbsp;John Saunders","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100145","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100145","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Positive peritoneal cytology is traditionally viewed as representative of metastatic disease and a poor prognostic factor. The objective of this multi-center study was to define the prognostic role of peritoneal cytology in curative gastrectomy, evaluate international variation in cytology sampling, and assess the impact on positive peritoneal cytology yields.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a multi-center international retrospective cohort study of 16 tertiary gastric cancer centers. Adult patients who underwent peritoneal lavage cytology at staging laparoscopy and subsequent gastrectomy between 2009 and 2023 were included. The primary outcome measure was overall survival at five years. Multivariable Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % CIs, adjusted for relevant confounding factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>837 patients with no radiological or macroscopic M1 disease were included, with a mean age of 66 (IQR 58–73) and 71 % were male. Non-distal gastric cancer was most common (47 %), with 59 % and 43 % of tumors staged pT3/4 and pN2/3, respectively. 66 patients (7.9 %) had positive cytology. Positive cytology was not associated with overall survival in multivariable analysis, controlled for stage and neoadjuvant treatment (HR=1.0; 95 %CI 0.51–2.0). Higher T and N stages were associated with positive cytology (p &lt; 0.001). The proportion of patients with positive cytology was variable, depending on how many quadrants were sampled.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Positive peritoneal cytology with otherwise M0 disease was not associated with decreased survival after curative intent gastrectomy in this study, meaning prospective study is needed. The technique of performing peritoneal washings influenced cytology yield and thus must be standardized in a much-needed prospective evaluation of peritoneal cytology.</div></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><div>The POPEC multicenter international retrospective cohort study included 837 patients receiving curative gastrectomy. This study showed the technique of performing peritoneal washings influenced cytology yield, however positive peritoneal cytology was not associated with decreased survival. Therefore, positive peritoneal cytology should not be considered an absolute contradiction to curatively intended gastrectomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144307707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival in stage IV colorectal cancer at diagnosis 诊断时IV期结直肠癌的生存率
Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.soi.2025.100144
Jeremy Chang , Carine Dornbush , Sarah L. Mott , Bradley Loeffler , Kristina Guyton , Jennifer Hrabe , Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp

Background

It is well established that the primary tumor anatomic location of colorectal cancer (CRC) affects tumor biology and disease course, however, there exist few large-scale studies investigating oncologic outcomes of metastatic CRC at diagnosis based on anatomic location of primary tumor and metastasis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2016 to 2019 was performed identifying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at diagnosis based on ICD-10 codes divided into left colon, right colon, and rectal primary. Patient demographic, tumor characteristic, treatment and outcomes data were obtained. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Multivariable Cox regression was performed.

Results

Intra-abdominal metastases are the most common metastases for all primary tumor locations, however, rectal cancer more frequently metastasizes to extra-abdominal organs. Regardless of primary tumor location, lung metastasis has improved overall survival compared with liver or M1b/1c disease. Compared with left colon and rectal primary, metastatic right sided colon cancer had the worst median overall survival. Receipt of any surgical management, radiation, or oncologic treatment to primary site or metastasis was associated with improved overall survival.

Conclusions

These findings underpin the heterogeneity of colorectal cancer tumor biology and highlight the importance of understanding primary tumor location and metastasis location for appropriate patient education and prognostication. Appropriate patients had improved survival and low mortality with surgery.
背景结直肠癌(CRC)的原发肿瘤解剖位置影响肿瘤生物学和病程,然而,基于原发肿瘤和转移的解剖位置诊断转移性结直肠癌的肿瘤预后的大规模研究很少。方法对2016 - 2019年美国国家癌症数据库(NCDB)进行回顾性分析,根据ICD-10编码分为左结肠、右结肠和直肠原发,对诊断时的转移性结直肠癌患者进行识别。获得患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、治疗和结局数据。主要结局指标是总生存期。采用多变量Cox回归分析。结果在所有原发肿瘤中,腹外转移是最常见的转移部位,而直肠癌更常转移到腹外器官。无论原发肿瘤的位置如何,与肝脏或M1b/1c疾病相比,肺转移可提高总生存率。与左结肠和直肠原发癌相比,转移性右侧结肠癌的中位总生存期最差。接受任何原发部位或转移部位的手术、放疗或肿瘤治疗与总生存率的提高相关。结论这些发现支持了结直肠癌肿瘤生物学的异质性,并强调了了解原发肿瘤和转移部位对于适当的患者教育和预后的重要性。适当的患者手术后生存率提高,死亡率低。
{"title":"Survival in stage IV colorectal cancer at diagnosis","authors":"Jeremy Chang ,&nbsp;Carine Dornbush ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Mott ,&nbsp;Bradley Loeffler ,&nbsp;Kristina Guyton ,&nbsp;Jennifer Hrabe ,&nbsp;Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100144","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100144","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is well established that the primary tumor anatomic location of colorectal cancer (CRC) affects tumor biology and disease course, however, there exist few large-scale studies investigating oncologic outcomes of metastatic CRC at diagnosis based on anatomic location of primary tumor and metastasis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2016 to 2019 was performed identifying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at diagnosis based on ICD-10 codes divided into left colon, right colon, and rectal primary. Patient demographic, tumor characteristic, treatment and outcomes data were obtained. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Multivariable Cox regression was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Intra-abdominal metastases are the most common metastases for all primary tumor locations, however, rectal cancer more frequently metastasizes to extra-abdominal organs. Regardless of primary tumor location, lung metastasis has improved overall survival compared with liver or M1b/1c disease. Compared with left colon and rectal primary, metastatic right sided colon cancer had the worst median overall survival. Receipt of any surgical management, radiation, or oncologic treatment to primary site or metastasis was associated with improved overall survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings underpin the heterogeneity of colorectal cancer tumor biology and highlight the importance of understanding primary tumor location and metastasis location for appropriate patient education and prognostication. Appropriate patients had improved survival and low mortality with surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144580683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Oncology Insight
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1