William Thurston Nash, Andrew G Chapple, Jeffrey T Johnson
Purpose: To determine the effect of potassium iodide (KI) on the black/gray staining caused by silver diammine fluoride (SDF) when applied to carious lesions. Methods: Extracted caries-free molar surfaces had caries induced to examine the use of SDF and SDF followed by KI (SDF+KI) on extracted permanent molars that had caries induced on their surfaces and were monitored for a period after application. To monitor the color changes, CIELAB color space readings???a color space defined by the International Commission on Illumination???were used. The system is composed of three values, of which the L* measures black to white across a span of zero (black) to 100 (white). Measurements were taken at eight intervals between days zero to 72. Results: L* values were found to be significantly different between SDF and SDF+KI groups and from baseline. On average, the SDF+KI group versus the SDF group was 9.47 units lighter. Conclusion: The findings indicate the application of silver diammine fluoride followed by potassium iodide can reduce the black staining SDF alone causes, potentially making it a viable esthetic option for patients with anterior tooth caries.
{"title":"Potassium Iodide's Effect on Silver Diammine Fluoride Staining Properties as Measured Through Objective Color Analysis Using CIELAB.","authors":"William Thurston Nash, Andrew G Chapple, Jeffrey T Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To determine the effect of potassium iodide (KI) on the black/gray staining caused by silver diammine fluoride (SDF) when applied to carious lesions. <b>Methods:</b> Extracted caries-free molar surfaces had caries induced to examine the use of SDF and SDF followed by KI (SDF+KI) on extracted permanent molars that had caries induced on their surfaces and were monitored for a period after application. To monitor the color changes, CIELAB color space readings???a color space defined by the International Commission on Illumination???were used. The system is composed of three values, of which the L* measures black to white across a span of zero (black) to 100 (white). Measurements were taken at eight intervals between days zero to 72. <b>Results:</b> L* values were found to be significantly different between SDF and SDF+KI groups and from baseline. On average, the SDF+KI group versus the SDF group was 9.47 units lighter. <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings indicate the application of silver diammine fluoride followed by potassium iodide can reduce the black staining SDF alone causes, potentially making it a viable esthetic option for patients with anterior tooth caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"52-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To survey pediatric dentists in the United States regarding adverse events during dental care for children. Methods: A self-administered, anonymous online survey was sent to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry members (N equals 6,327) using REDCap® software (between October and December 2019). The questionnaire (all items with radio-button numerical categories) included five items surveying pediatric adverse event occurrence and seven demographic items. Annualized occurrences of adverse events in US pediatric dental practices were extrapolated from the data collected. Results: The survey response was 11 percent (n equals 704), with 91 percent of respondents reporting that at least one child experienced an adverse event during dental treatment. The two most prevalent adverse events, each reported by 82 percent of respondents, were self-inflicted trauma to soft tissues after local anesthesia and nausea and vomiting, with annualized estimates of 7,816 and 7,003, respectively. Major adverse events (respiratory depression, cardiovascular depression, neurological damage, death) during pediatric dental treatment were reported by 14 percent of respondents (annualized estimate equals 443). "Wrong" errors (wrong tooth/wrong procedure/wrong patient) were reported by 24 percent of respondents (annualized estimate equals 600). Conclusions: Adverse events during pediatric dental care are of noticeable concern with some (wrong tooth/wrong procedure/wrong patient errors) that can be procedurally mitigated.
{"title":"Adverse Events in Pediatric Dental Practice: Survey of Pediatric Dentists in the United States.","authors":"William Nicola, Aviv Ouanounou, S M Hashim Nainar","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To survey pediatric dentists in the United States regarding adverse events during dental care for children. <b>Methods:</b> A self-administered, anonymous online survey was sent to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry members (N equals 6,327) using REDCap<sup>®</sup> software (between October and December 2019). The questionnaire (all items with radio-button numerical categories) included five items surveying pediatric adverse event occurrence and seven demographic items. Annualized occurrences of adverse events in US pediatric dental practices were extrapolated from the data collected. <b>Results:</b> The survey response was 11 percent (n equals 704), with 91 percent of respondents reporting that at least one child experienced an adverse event during dental treatment. The two most prevalent adverse events, each reported by 82 percent of respondents, were self-inflicted trauma to soft tissues after local anesthesia and nausea and vomiting, with annualized estimates of 7,816 and 7,003, respectively. Major adverse events (respiratory depression, cardiovascular depression, neurological damage, death) during pediatric dental treatment were reported by 14 percent of respondents (annualized estimate equals 443). \"Wrong\" errors (wrong tooth/wrong procedure/wrong patient) were reported by 24 percent of respondents (annualized estimate equals 600). <b>Conclusions:</b> Adverse events during pediatric dental care are of noticeable concern with some (wrong tooth/wrong procedure/wrong patient errors) that can be procedurally mitigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sheaffer Yinger, Daniel Claman, Jennifer Luca, Kim Hammersmith, Erin Gross, Beau Meyer
Purpose: To describe triazolam in pediatric dental mild to moderate sedation and report changes to overall visit behavior for permanent first molar extraction. Methods: This retrospective chart review from 2018 to 2022 analyzed demographic, procedural, and behavioral data for children eight years and older receiving triazolam for a permanent first molar extraction. The outcomes included adverse events measured by deviations in heart rate and oxygen saturation and changes to overall visit-level Frankl scores from the referral to sedation visit. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted. Results: The study population (n equals 82) was predominantly female (61 percent), English-speaking (85 percent), and White (41 percent) or Black (39 percent). The most common indication for mild to moderate sedation was dental anxiety (28 percent). There were zero instances of adverse events requiring emergency intervention or the use of reversal medication. The change in visit-level Frankl scores was significantly positive (P<0.001). Conclusion: Triazolam is likely a safe choice for mild to moderate sedation, leading to improved overall visit behavior in children undergoing a permanent first molar extraction.
{"title":"Triazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Retrospective Evaluation of Safety and Changes in Visit Behavior.","authors":"Sheaffer Yinger, Daniel Claman, Jennifer Luca, Kim Hammersmith, Erin Gross, Beau Meyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To describe triazolam in pediatric dental mild to moderate sedation and report changes to overall visit behavior for permanent first molar extraction. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective chart review from 2018 to 2022 analyzed demographic, procedural, and behavioral data for children eight years and older receiving triazolam for a permanent first molar extraction. The outcomes included adverse events measured by deviations in heart rate and oxygen saturation and changes to overall visit-level Frankl scores from the referral to sedation visit. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted. <b>Results:</b> The study population (n equals 82) was predominantly female (61 percent), English-speaking (85 percent), and White (41 percent) or Black (39 percent). The most common indication for mild to moderate sedation was dental anxiety (28 percent). There were zero instances of adverse events requiring emergency intervention or the use of reversal medication. The change in visit-level Frankl scores was significantly positive (P<0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Triazolam is likely a safe choice for mild to moderate sedation, leading to improved overall visit behavior in children undergoing a permanent first molar extraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"63-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rata Rokhshad, Ping Zhang, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi, Parnian Shobeiri, Falk Schwendicke
Purpose: To systematically evaluate artificial intelligence applications for diagnostic and treatment planning possibilities in pediatric dentistry. Methods: PubMed®, EMBASE®, Scopus, Web of Science™, IEEE, medRxiv, arXiv, and Google Scholar were searched using specific search queries. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias assessment of the included studies. Results: Based on the initial screening, 33 eligible studies were included (among 3,542). Eleven studies appeared to have low bias risk across all QUADAS-2 domains. Most applications focused on early childhood caries diagnosis and prediction, tooth identification, oral health evaluation, and supernumerary tooth identification. Six studies evaluated AI tools for mesiodens or supernumerary tooth identification on radigraphs, four for primary tooth identification and/or numbering, seven studies to detect caries on radiographs, and 12 to predict early childhood caries. For these four tasks, the reported accuracy of AI varied from 60 percent to 99 percent, sensitivity was from 20 percent to 100 percent, specificity was from 49 percent to 100 percent, F1-score was from 60 percent to 97 percent, and the area-under-the-curve varied from 87 percent to 100 percent. Conclusions: The overall body of evidence regarding artificial intelligence applications in pediatric dentistry does not allow for firm conclusions. For a wide range of applications, AI shows promising accuracy. Future studies should focus on a comparison of AI against the standard of care and employ a set of standardized outcomes and metrics to allow comparison across studies.
{"title":"Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rata Rokhshad, Ping Zhang, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi, Parnian Shobeiri, Falk Schwendicke","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To systematically evaluate artificial intelligence applications for diagnostic and treatment planning possibilities in pediatric dentistry. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed<sup>®</sup>, EMBASE<sup>®</sup>, Scopus, Web of Science<sup>™</sup>, IEEE, medRxiv, arXiv, and Google Scholar were searched using specific search queries. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias assessment of the included studies. <b>Results:</b> Based on the initial screening, 33 eligible studies were included (among 3,542). Eleven studies appeared to have low bias risk across all QUADAS-2 domains. Most applications focused on early childhood caries diagnosis and prediction, tooth identification, oral health evaluation, and supernumerary tooth identification. Six studies evaluated AI tools for mesiodens or supernumerary tooth identification on radigraphs, four for primary tooth identification and/or numbering, seven studies to detect caries on radiographs, and 12 to predict early childhood caries. For these four tasks, the reported accuracy of AI varied from 60 percent to 99 percent, sensitivity was from 20 percent to 100 percent, specificity was from 49 percent to 100 percent, F1-score was from 60 percent to 97 percent, and the area-under-the-curve varied from 87 percent to 100 percent. <b>Conclusions:</b> The overall body of evidence regarding artificial intelligence applications in pediatric dentistry does not allow for firm conclusions. For a wide range of applications, AI shows promising accuracy. Future studies should focus on a comparison of AI against the standard of care and employ a set of standardized outcomes and metrics to allow comparison across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James A Coll, Vineet Dhar, Chia-Yu Chen, Yasmi O Crystal, Marcio Guelmann, Abdullah A Marghalani, Shahad AlShamali, Zheng Xu, Gerald N Glickman, Rachel Wedeward
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to present an evidence-based guideline for primary teeth with deep caries or trauma requiring vital pulp therapies (VPT). Methods: A systematic review/meta-analysis on vital primary teeth resulting from trauma or caries was conducted using GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for clinical recommendations. A decision tree was provided for choosing VPTs. Results: No articles on trauma VPT were found. For VPT in primary teeth with deep caries, indirect pulp treatment (IPT) or pulpotomy using the calcium silicate cement (mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA] or Biodentine®) show increased success over using direct pulp capping (DPC) and other pulpotomies. Different liners do not affect IPT success (high certainty) or DPC capping agents' success (very low certainty) after 24 months. It is strongly recommended, with high certainty from 24-month data, that calcium silicate cement pulpotomy is preferred over formocresol, ferric sulfate, zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy, and other pulpotomies. Using selective caries removal and IPT for deep caries is strongly recommended with moderate certainty over complete and stepwise removal. Statistically, this results in significantly fewer pulp exposures. No caries removal and Hall technique crown may be used when indicated (moderate certainty at 24 months). For vital primary incisors with deep caries, pulpotomy was significantly better statistically than pulpectomy. Teeth diagnosed with/without reversible pulpitis pain showed comparable success after 12 months of treatment by IPT or calcium silicate cement pulpotomy. The following had little or no significant effect on MTA pulpotomy success: coronal pulp removal methods; irrigation solution; method to control hemorrhage; base over MTA; treatment in one or two visits; anterior or posterior teeth. Conclusions: Indirect pulp treatment or calcium silicate cement pulpotomy is likely to increase vital pulp therapy success over other VPTs such as direct pulp capping and other pulpotomies after 24 months (moderate certainty).
{"title":"Use of Vital Pulp Therapies in Primary Teeth 2024.","authors":"James A Coll, Vineet Dhar, Chia-Yu Chen, Yasmi O Crystal, Marcio Guelmann, Abdullah A Marghalani, Shahad AlShamali, Zheng Xu, Gerald N Glickman, Rachel Wedeward","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to present an evidence-based guideline for primary teeth with deep caries or trauma requiring vital pulp therapies (VPT). <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review/meta-analysis on vital primary teeth resulting from trauma or caries was conducted using GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for clinical recommendations. A decision tree was provided for choosing VPTs. <b>Results:</b> No articles on trauma VPT were found. For VPT in primary teeth with deep caries, indirect pulp treatment (IPT) or pulpotomy using the calcium silicate cement (mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA] or Biodentine<sup>®</sup>) show increased success over using direct pulp capping (DPC) and other pulpotomies. Different liners do not affect IPT success (high certainty) or DPC capping agents' success (very low certainty) after 24 months. It is strongly recommended, with high certainty from 24-month data, that calcium silicate cement pulpotomy is preferred over formocresol, ferric sulfate, zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy, and other pulpotomies. Using selective caries removal and IPT for deep caries is strongly recommended with moderate certainty over complete and stepwise removal. Statistically, this results in significantly fewer pulp exposures. No caries removal and Hall technique crown may be used when indicated (moderate certainty at 24 months). For vital primary incisors with deep caries, pulpotomy was significantly better statistically than pulpectomy. Teeth diagnosed with/without reversible pulpitis pain showed comparable success after 12 months of treatment by IPT or calcium silicate cement pulpotomy. The following had little or no significant effect on MTA pulpotomy success: coronal pulp removal methods; irrigation solution; method to control hemorrhage; base over MTA; treatment in one or two visits; anterior or posterior teeth. <b>Conclusions:</b> Indirect pulp treatment or calcium silicate cement pulpotomy is likely to increase vital pulp therapy success over other VPTs such as direct pulp capping and other pulpotomies after 24 months (moderate certainty).</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra R Kolar, Mark A Saxen, James E Jones, Juan F Yepes, George Eckert
Purpose: Intraoral oxygen pooling during dental sedation, especially using supplemental oxygen, is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous perioperative fire. The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the effectiveness of intraoral suctioning for reducing oxygen pooling to safe levels during a simulated dental procedure. Methods: Phase one: Twenty trials were completed for each of the three suctioning devices: high-volume evacuation (HVE), fixed tip saliva ejector (SE), and Yankauer suction (YS). Phase two: Twenty trials were completed for each of three suctioning scenarios: no suctioning and continuous suctioning for the HVE and SE. Results: In phase one, the slope for change (decrease) in oxygen during suction was significantly larger for SE than HVE (P<0.001) and YS (P<0.001), but for HVE and YS were not significantly different. Mean oxygen levels during suction were significantly higher for SE than HVE (P<0.001) and YS (P<0.001). In phase two, oxygen increased faster for no suction than for SE and HVE (P<0.001) and increased faster for SE than HVE (P<0.001). Mean oxygen levels were significantly lower for HVE than for SE (P<0.001) and no suction (P<0.001), and significantly lower for SE than no suction (P<0.001). Conclusion: All three devices were effective for reducing intraoral oxygen concentration to acceptable levels during the procedure. The HVE was the most effective suction device for rapidly evacuating pooled intraoral oxygen.
{"title":"Supplemental Oxygen Concentrations and the Use of Suction to Mitigate Risk of Oral Surgical Fires Using a Laboratory Model.","authors":"Alexandra R Kolar, Mark A Saxen, James E Jones, Juan F Yepes, George Eckert","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Intraoral oxygen pooling during dental sedation, especially using supplemental oxygen, is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous perioperative fire. The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the effectiveness of intraoral suctioning for reducing oxygen pooling to safe levels during a simulated dental procedure. <b>Methods:</b> Phase one: Twenty trials were completed for each of the three suctioning devices: high-volume evacuation (HVE), fixed tip saliva ejector (SE), and Yankauer suction (YS). Phase two: Twenty trials were completed for each of three suctioning scenarios: no suctioning and continuous suctioning for the HVE and SE. <b>Results:</b> In phase one, the slope for change (decrease) in oxygen during suction was significantly larger for SE than HVE (P<0.001) and YS (P<0.001), but for HVE and YS were not significantly different. Mean oxygen levels during suction were significantly higher for SE than HVE (P<0.001) and YS (P<0.001). In phase two, oxygen increased faster for no suction than for SE and HVE (P<0.001) and increased faster for SE than HVE (P<0.001). Mean oxygen levels were significantly lower for HVE than for SE (P<0.001) and no suction (P<0.001), and significantly lower for SE than no suction (P<0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> All three devices were effective for reducing intraoral oxygen concentration to acceptable levels during the procedure. The HVE was the most effective suction device for rapidly evacuating pooled intraoral oxygen.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"58-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Margherita Fontana, Divya Khera, Steven Levy, George Eckert, Barry Katz, Emily Yanca, Carlos González-Cabezas, Amr Moursi
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of 38 percent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in arresting cavitated caries lesions in young U.S. children. Methods: Children 12 to 71 months of age with severe early childhood caries participated in this phase three, multicenter, randomized, placebocontrolled trial. SDF was applied twice (at baseline and six months), and children were followed for eight months. A planned interim analysis of only the six-month primary outcome caries arrest data, for approximately half of the cohort (680 of 1,144 children), was conducted using a generalized estimating equation model, accounting for non-independence among carious lesions within a patient. Results: Five hundred ninety-nine of the 680 participants, with 1,413 lesions, completed the six-month exam. Lesions in the SDF group demonstrated 54 percent arrest versus 21 percent in the placebo (P<0.001). Conclusions: Silver diamine fluoride was effective at arresting active cavitated lesions in this population, leading to the early stop of the trial. Final analyses of all data and other outcomes are currently underway.
{"title":"A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess Caries Arrest by Using Silver Diamine Fluoride in U.S. Children: Interim Findings.","authors":"Margherita Fontana, Divya Khera, Steven Levy, George Eckert, Barry Katz, Emily Yanca, Carlos González-Cabezas, Amr Moursi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess the effectiveness of 38 percent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in arresting cavitated caries lesions in young U.S. children. <b>Methods:</b> Children 12 to 71 months of age with severe early childhood caries participated in this phase three, multicenter, randomized, placebocontrolled trial. SDF was applied twice (at baseline and six months), and children were followed for eight months. A planned interim analysis of only the six-month primary outcome caries arrest data, for approximately half of the cohort (680 of 1,144 children), was conducted using a generalized estimating equation model, accounting for non-independence among carious lesions within a patient. Results: Five hundred ninety-nine of the 680 participants, with 1,413 lesions, completed the six-month exam. Lesions in the SDF group demonstrated 54 percent arrest versus 21 percent in the placebo (P<0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Silver diamine fluoride was effective at arresting active cavitated lesions in this population, leading to the early stop of the trial. Final analyses of all data and other outcomes are currently underway.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"8-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921985/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of a dental desensitization clinical program on the ability of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to complete a routine preventive dental visit. Methods: English-speaking children with a diagnosis of ASD were enrolled in a prospective cohort study as part of a dental desensitization program. A task analysis (TA) and desensitization plan breaking down a routine dental visit into seven steps was designed and implemented. At each dental visit over a two-year period, the child's comfort level with each step of the TA was collected. Results: Fifty-two patients participated in this program (average age equals 7.9±3.6 years, 80 percent male). Each participant completed, on average, 6.7 desensitization visits. Approximately half of the study participants were able to complete all steps of the TA during the study period. There was a statistically significant positive relationship between the number of desensitization visits and the number of steps of the dental visit the child could complete comfortably. Children with expressive and receptive language skills were more likely to complete all steps of the TA. Conclusion: Dental desensitization is a behavior guidance intervention that can support children with autism spectrum disorder to complete routine preventive dental visits.
目的:评估牙科脱敏临床项目对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童完成常规预防性牙科就诊能力的影响。方法:将被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的英语儿童纳入一项前瞻性队列研究,作为牙科脱敏项目的一部分。研究人员设计并实施了一项任务分析(TA)和脱敏计划,将常规牙科就诊分为七个步骤。在为期两年的每次牙科就诊中,收集儿童对任务分析和脱敏计划每个步骤的舒适度。结果:52名患者参与了该计划(平均年龄为7.9±3.6岁,80%为男性)。每位参与者平均完成了 6.7 次脱敏治疗。在研究期间,约有一半的参与者能够完成 TA 的所有步骤。在统计学上,脱敏治疗的次数与儿童能够舒适地完成牙科就诊步骤的次数之间存在明显的正相关关系。具有语言表达和接受能力的儿童更有可能完成TA的所有步骤。结论牙科脱敏是一种行为指导干预措施,可以帮助患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童完成常规预防性牙科就诊。
{"title":"Dental Desensitization to Increase Comfort with Preventive Dental Visits for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Jean Star, Helen Mo, Tara Glavin, Whitney Ence","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the impact of a dental desensitization clinical program on the ability of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to complete a routine preventive dental visit. <b>Methods:</b> English-speaking children with a diagnosis of ASD were enrolled in a prospective cohort study as part of a dental desensitization program. A task analysis (TA) and desensitization plan breaking down a routine dental visit into seven steps was designed and implemented. At each dental visit over a two-year period, the child's comfort level with each step of the TA was collected. <b>Results:</b> Fifty-two patients participated in this program (average age equals 7.9±3.6 years, 80 percent male). Each participant completed, on average, 6.7 desensitization visits. Approximately half of the study participants were able to complete all steps of the TA during the study period. There was a statistically significant positive relationship between the number of desensitization visits and the number of steps of the dental visit the child could complete comfortably. Children with expressive and receptive language skills were more likely to complete all steps of the TA. <b>Conclusion:</b> Dental desensitization is a behavior guidance intervention that can support children with autism spectrum disorder to complete routine preventive dental visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"45 6","pages":"518-523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138833915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}