首页 > 最新文献

Chirurgia最新文献

英文 中文
Outcomes Post Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision Plane Resections Following Setting up Complex Colorectal Cancer Service in a District General Hospital. 在一家地区综合医院建立复杂结直肠癌服务后的全直肠系膜切除平面切除术后效果。
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.272
Valentin Butnari, Ahmer Mansuri, Peter Kyle, Rajeev Prasad, Anthony Ghosh, Rekha Wuntakal, Anand Kelkar, Sandeep Gujral, Gursharan Paul Singh, Baskaran Sabapathipillai, Waseemullah Khan, Richard Boulton, Saswata Banerjee, Matthew Hanson, Joseph Huang, David Burling, Sandeep Kaul, Nirooshun Rajendran

Background: This study aims to validate the feasibility of a hub-and-spoke model for pelvic exenteration (PE) surgery while upholding favorable patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PE at our trust October 2017 and December 2023 was conducted. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were employed. Results: Sixty-seven patients underwent PE during the study period, mainly for locally advanced colorectal cancer (n=61, 91.04%). Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 16 cases (Robotic 3, 4.47% / Laparoscopic 13, 19.40) while the rest of patients 51 had open surgery (75.11%). Median hospital stay was 12 days (range:8-20). While 24 patients (35.82%) developed major complications (CD III-IV) post-surgery, there were no mortalities associated with pelvic exenteration in this study. Of the 67 patients undergoing surgery with curative intent, negative margins (R0 resection) were achieved in 57 patients (85.12%). This is comparable to outcomes reported by the PelvEx collaborative (85.07% versus 79.8%). At a median follow-up of 22 months, 15 patient (22.38%) recurred with 10.44% local recurrence rate. The 2 years overall and disease-free survival were 85.31% and 77.0.36%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that a nascent PE service, supported by specialist expertise and resources, can achieve good surgical outcomes within a district general hospital.

背景:本研究旨在验证骨盆外展手术(PE)中枢-辐条模式的可行性,同时保持良好的患者预后。方法对2017年10月至2023年12月在我院接受PE手术的患者进行回顾性分析。采用描述性统计和 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析。结果:67 名患者接受了 PE 治疗:67名患者在研究期间接受了PE手术,主要是局部晚期结直肠癌(61人,91.04%)。16例患者接受了微创手术(机器人3例,4.47%;腹腔镜13例,19.40%),其余51例患者接受了开放手术(75.11%)。住院时间中位数为 12 天(8-20 天不等)。虽然有 24 名患者(35.82%)在术后出现了主要并发症(CD III-IV),但本研究中没有出现与骨盆外露相关的死亡病例。在 67 名接受根治性手术的患者中,有 57 名患者(85.12%)达到了阴性边缘(R0 切除)。这与 PelvEx 合作组织报告的结果相当(85.07% 对 79.8%)。在 22 个月的中位随访中,15 名患者(22.38%)复发,局部复发率为 10.44%。2年总生存率和无病生存率分别为85.31%和77.0.36%。结论我们的研究表明,在专科专家和资源的支持下,初创的肺癌治疗服务可以在地区综合医院内取得良好的手术效果。
{"title":"Outcomes Post Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision Plane Resections Following Setting up Complex Colorectal Cancer Service in a District General Hospital.","authors":"Valentin Butnari, Ahmer Mansuri, Peter Kyle, Rajeev Prasad, Anthony Ghosh, Rekha Wuntakal, Anand Kelkar, Sandeep Gujral, Gursharan Paul Singh, Baskaran Sabapathipillai, Waseemullah Khan, Richard Boulton, Saswata Banerjee, Matthew Hanson, Joseph Huang, David Burling, Sandeep Kaul, Nirooshun Rajendran","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study aims to validate the feasibility of a hub-and-spoke model for pelvic exenteration (PE) surgery while upholding favorable patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PE at our trust October 2017 and December 2023 was conducted. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were employed. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-seven patients underwent PE during the study period, mainly for locally advanced colorectal cancer (n=61, 91.04%). Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 16 cases (Robotic 3, 4.47% / Laparoscopic 13, 19.40) while the rest of patients 51 had open surgery (75.11%). Median hospital stay was 12 days (range:8-20). While 24 patients (35.82%) developed major complications (CD III-IV) post-surgery, there were no mortalities associated with pelvic exenteration in this study. Of the 67 patients undergoing surgery with curative intent, negative margins (R0 resection) were achieved in 57 patients (85.12%). This is comparable to outcomes reported by the PelvEx collaborative (85.07% versus 79.8%). At a median follow-up of 22 months, 15 patient (22.38%) recurred with 10.44% local recurrence rate. The 2 years overall and disease-free survival were 85.31% and 77.0.36%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that a nascent PE service, supported by specialist expertise and resources, can achieve good surgical outcomes within a district general hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"272-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Prognostic Value of NLR, PLR, APRI, SII, and Liver Function Tests for Fistula Formation after Colorectal Cancer Surgery. 评估NLR、PLR、APRI、SII和肝功能检验对结直肠癌术后瘘管形成的预后价值
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.284
Vlad Braicu, Lazar Fulger, Pantea Stelian, Ciprian Duta, Gabriel Verdes, Dan Brebu, Ana-Olivia Toma, Roxana Manuela Fericean, Gabriel Veniamin Cozma

Background: This study evaluates the predictive value of preoperative inflammatory markers (NLR, PLR, APRI, SII) and liver function tests in determining the risk of fistula development postcolorectal cancer surgery. The objective was to determine the association between elevated marker levels and fistula risk and establish thresholds for preoperative risk stratification. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the "Pius Brinzeu" Clinical Emergency Hospital from 2018 to 2023, analyzing data from 219 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Results: Among the markers studied, the Systemic Inflammation Index (SII) with a cutoff 460.5 showed the highest sensitivity (75.6%) and specificity (71.3%), resulting in an AUC of 0.774 (p=0.001). Albumin levels 2.9 g/dL also significantly predicted fistula occurrence with 77.3% sensitivity and 73.8% specificity (AUC 0.788, p 0.001). Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) presented cutoffs of 3.95 and 191.6 respectively, demonstrating substantial predictive value with AUCs of 0.732 and 0.746 (p 0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Elevated levels of specific preoperative inflammatory markers and liver function tests are significantly associated with the risk of developing fistulas in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. These findings support the integration of these biomarkers into preoperative evaluations to enhance patient risk stratification and optimize surgical outcomes, providing a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in colorectal surgery settings.

背景:本研究评估了术前炎症标志物(NLR、PLR、APRI、SII)和肝功能检测在确定结直肠癌术后瘘管发生风险方面的预测价值。目的是确定标记物水平升高与瘘管风险之间的关联,并确定术前风险分层的阈值。方法:2018年至2023年,"Pius Brinzeu "临床急诊医院开展了一项回顾性队列研究,分析了219名接受结直肠癌手术的患者的数据。结果:在所研究的标记物中,以460.5为临界值的全身炎症指数(SII)显示出最高的灵敏度(75.6%)和特异性(71.3%),其AUC为0.774(p=0.001)。白蛋白水平为 2.9 g/dL 也能显著预测瘘管的发生,灵敏度为 77.3%,特异度为 73.8%(AUC 为 0.788,p 0.001)。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)的临界值分别为 3.95 和 191.6,具有很高的预测价值,AUC 分别为 0.732 和 0.746(P 0.001 和 P=0.001)。结论术前特定炎症标志物和肝功能检测水平升高与接受结直肠癌手术的患者发生瘘管的风险显著相关。这些研究结果支持将这些生物标志物纳入术前评估,以加强患者风险分层和优化手术效果,为结直肠手术的临床决策提供有价值的工具。
{"title":"Assessing the Prognostic Value of NLR, PLR, APRI, SII, and Liver Function Tests for Fistula Formation after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.","authors":"Vlad Braicu, Lazar Fulger, Pantea Stelian, Ciprian Duta, Gabriel Verdes, Dan Brebu, Ana-Olivia Toma, Roxana Manuela Fericean, Gabriel Veniamin Cozma","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study evaluates the predictive value of preoperative inflammatory markers (NLR, PLR, APRI, SII) and liver function tests in determining the risk of fistula development postcolorectal cancer surgery. The objective was to determine the association between elevated marker levels and fistula risk and establish thresholds for preoperative risk stratification. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the \"Pius Brinzeu\" Clinical Emergency Hospital from 2018 to 2023, analyzing data from 219 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. <b>Results:</b> Among the markers studied, the Systemic Inflammation Index (SII) with a cutoff 460.5 showed the highest sensitivity (75.6%) and specificity (71.3%), resulting in an AUC of 0.774 (p=0.001). Albumin levels 2.9 g/dL also significantly predicted fistula occurrence with 77.3% sensitivity and 73.8% specificity (AUC 0.788, p 0.001). Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) presented cutoffs of 3.95 and 191.6 respectively, demonstrating substantial predictive value with AUCs of 0.732 and 0.746 (p 0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> Elevated levels of specific preoperative inflammatory markers and liver function tests are significantly associated with the risk of developing fistulas in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. These findings support the integration of these biomarkers into preoperative evaluations to enhance patient risk stratification and optimize surgical outcomes, providing a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in colorectal surgery settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"284-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evolution of Surgical Management of Complicated Left Colon Cancer. 左侧结肠癌并发症手术治疗的演变。
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.294
Marius Lazăr, Marius Bică, Ștefan Pătraà Cu, Daniela Marinescu, Daniel Preda, Valeriu Șurlin

Complicated colon cancer accounts for up to 40% of colon cancer patients. While the management of complicated right colon cancer has some standard recommendations, for complicated left colon cancer single stage or two-stage procedures are subject to controversies.

Aim: To study the types of procedures and postoperative morbidity and mortality for complicated left colon cancer patients admitted to the 1st Surgical Clinic of the County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Craiova during the past 23 years. We aimed to present the evolution of the surgical management in the emergency procedures for complicated left colon.

Material and method: retrospective study of patients with complicated left colon cancer admitted to our clinic between 2001 and 2023. We analyzed the postoperative morbidity and mortality of each type of emergency procedure (single stage or two-stage) and compared them throughout three periods of time. Results: Three groups observed: G1 â?" 2001-2010, (96 patients); G2 â?" 2011-2016, (65 patients); G3 â?" 2017-2023, (77 patients). We registered significant increase in single stage procedures from G1 to G2 (11.2% vs. 33.8%). In G3, single stage procedure rate decreased significantly (20.8% vs. 33.8%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality was significantly lower in G2 compared to G1 in both single stage and two-stage procedures. G3 compared to G2 registered significant decrease for single stage procedures but similar for two-stage procedures.

Conclusion: For left colon emergencies, two-stage procedures seem safer, as resections with primary anastomosis, even with selected cases and experienced surgeons, still associate higher postoperative morbidity and mortality.

复杂性结肠癌占结肠癌患者的 40%。虽然对并发右结肠癌的处理有一些标准建议,但对并发左结肠癌的单期或两期手术却存在争议。目的:研究过去 23 年中克拉约瓦县临床急诊医院第一外科诊所收治的并发左结肠癌患者的手术类型、术后发病率和死亡率。材料和方法:对2001年至2023年期间在本诊所住院的复杂性左结肠癌患者进行回顾性研究。我们分析了每种急诊手术(单阶或双阶)的术后发病率和死亡率,并在三个时间段内进行了比较。结果如下观察到三个组别:G12001-2010年,(96名患者);G2 â?2011-2016年,(65名患者);G3 â?2017-2023年,(77名患者)。我们发现,从G1到G2,单阶段手术率明显增加(11.2% vs. 33.8%)。在G3,单阶段手术率明显下降(20.8% 对 33.8%)。无论是单阶段手术还是两阶段手术,G2 的术后发病率和死亡率都明显低于 G1。G3与G2相比,单段手术的死亡率明显降低,但两段手术的死亡率相似:结论:对于左侧结肠急症,两段式手术似乎更安全,因为即使是经过挑选的病例和经验丰富的外科医生进行的一次吻合术切除,术后发病率和死亡率仍然较高。
{"title":"Evolution of Surgical Management of Complicated Left Colon Cancer.","authors":"Marius Lazăr, Marius Bică, Ștefan Pătraà Cu, Daniela Marinescu, Daniel Preda, Valeriu Șurlin","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.294","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.294","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complicated colon cancer accounts for up to 40% of colon cancer patients. While the management of complicated right colon cancer has some standard recommendations, for complicated left colon cancer single stage or two-stage procedures are subject to controversies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the types of procedures and postoperative morbidity and mortality for complicated left colon cancer patients admitted to the 1st Surgical Clinic of the County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Craiova during the past 23 years. We aimed to present the evolution of the surgical management in the emergency procedures for complicated left colon.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>retrospective study of patients with complicated left colon cancer admitted to our clinic between 2001 and 2023. We analyzed the postoperative morbidity and mortality of each type of emergency procedure (single stage or two-stage) and compared them throughout three periods of time. <b>Results:</b> Three groups observed: G1 â?\" 2001-2010, (96 patients); G2 â?\" 2011-2016, (65 patients); G3 â?\" 2017-2023, (77 patients). We registered significant increase in single stage procedures from G1 to G2 (11.2% vs. 33.8%). In G3, single stage procedure rate decreased significantly (20.8% vs. 33.8%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality was significantly lower in G2 compared to G1 in both single stage and two-stage procedures. G3 compared to G2 registered significant decrease for single stage procedures but similar for two-stage procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For left colon emergencies, two-stage procedures seem safer, as resections with primary anastomosis, even with selected cases and experienced surgeons, still associate higher postoperative morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"294-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cholecystectomy in Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study. 轻度和中度急性胰腺炎的胆囊切除术:回顾性研究
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.304
Suzana Maces, Dragos Margaritescu, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Daniel Preda, Stefan Patrascu, Dragos Garofil, Radu Petre, Victor Dan Eugen, Daniela Dumitrescu, Valeriu Surlin

Background: Cholecystectomy has been a subject of debate regarding its timing and utility in cases of mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to critically evaluate the role of early cholecystectomy in the management of mild and moderate AP, considering patient's characteristics, associated procedures, and overall impact on patient outcomes. Methods: The study compared the outcomes between patients admitted in a tertiary care surgical center undergoing early ( 96h) versus delayed ( 96h) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for mild and moderately severe acute gallstone pancreatitis between January 2019 and December 2022. Results: The study included 54 cases [mean (standard deviation) age, 59.4 (16.5) years; 31 (57.4%) years females]. All patients underwent LC, with 29 cases undergoing a two-phase therapeutic regimen for common bile duct (CBD) lithiasis, consisting of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by sequential LC. The early cholecystectomy group (EC) comprised 17 patients (31.5%), while the delayed cholecystectomy group (DC) included 37 patients (68.5%). EC was significantly correlated with lower length of stay (p-value 0.0001) and significantly lower rate of ERCP usage during perioperative period. Conclusions: EC in the first 4 days after admission provides significant benefits such as prevention of recurrent pancreatitis, reduction in complications, and decreased length of stay for patients with mild and moderately severe AP.

背景:胆囊切除术在轻度和中度重症急性胰腺炎(AP)病例中的时机和作用一直是争论的焦点。考虑到患者的特征、相关手术以及对患者预后的总体影响,我们旨在批判性地评估早期胆囊切除术在轻度和中度急性胰腺炎治疗中的作用。研究方法该研究比较了 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在一家三级护理外科中心接受早期(96 小时)与延迟(96 小时)腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗轻度和中度急性胆石性胰腺炎的患者的预后。研究结果研究共纳入 54 例患者[平均(标准差)年龄 59.4(16.5)岁;女性 31(57.4%)岁]。所有患者均接受了胆囊切除术,其中 29 例患者接受了两阶段胆总管(CBD)结石治疗方案,包括内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和胆囊切除术。早期胆囊切除术组(EC)包括 17 名患者(31.5%),而延迟胆囊切除术组(DC)包括 37 名患者(68.5%)。EC与较短的住院时间(P值为0.0001)和围手术期使用ERCP的比例明显较低。结论入院后 4 天内进行 EC 可为轻度和中度 AP 患者带来显著益处,如预防复发性胰腺炎、减少并发症和缩短住院时间。
{"title":"Cholecystectomy in Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Suzana Maces, Dragos Margaritescu, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Daniel Preda, Stefan Patrascu, Dragos Garofil, Radu Petre, Victor Dan Eugen, Daniela Dumitrescu, Valeriu Surlin","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cholecystectomy has been a subject of debate regarding its timing and utility in cases of mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to critically evaluate the role of early cholecystectomy in the management of mild and moderate AP, considering patient's characteristics, associated procedures, and overall impact on patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> The study compared the outcomes between patients admitted in a tertiary care surgical center undergoing early ( 96h) versus delayed ( 96h) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for mild and moderately severe acute gallstone pancreatitis between January 2019 and December 2022. <b>Results:</b> The study included 54 cases [mean (standard deviation) age, 59.4 (16.5) years; 31 (57.4%) years females]. All patients underwent LC, with 29 cases undergoing a two-phase therapeutic regimen for common bile duct (CBD) lithiasis, consisting of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by sequential LC. The early cholecystectomy group (EC) comprised 17 patients (31.5%), while the delayed cholecystectomy group (DC) included 37 patients (68.5%). EC was significantly correlated with lower length of stay (p-value 0.0001) and significantly lower rate of ERCP usage during perioperative period. <b>Conclusions:</b> EC in the first 4 days after admission provides significant benefits such as prevention of recurrent pancreatitis, reduction in complications, and decreased length of stay for patients with mild and moderately severe AP.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"304-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ex-situ Open Approach Spleen Preserving Splenic Hilum Lymphadenectomy. 原位开放式脾保留脾门淋巴结切除术
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.330
Sever Calin Moldovan

Background: multiple studies showed important benefices arising from splenic preservation in patients with digestive cancer in general and gastric cancer in particular. The minimally invasive approach remains controversial in locally advanced gastric cancer cases whilst the open approach still has an important role. This paper's aim is to describe and present the feasibility of an open surgical technique that allows removing stations 10 together with 11p and 11d with spleen and splenic vessels preservation in pacients operated upon by open surgery. Material and Methods: We present an open "Ex-situ" spleen and pancreas preserving surgical technique that removes the anterior and posterior ganglia from the splenic hilum, the splenic vessels and the distal pancreas in locally advanced gastric cancer cases of the upper two thirds of the stomach. Forty-three consecutive patients since 2003 were operated upon by the author in multiple centers. during upper two thirds gastric cancer resections requiring no. 10 lymphadenectomy. Results: no splenectomy was needed . All the spleens were viable at postoperative Doppler echography and CT scans. No spleen migrated nor caused mechanical complications. No clinically significant pancreatic leaks were noticed. Two patients died during hospital stay, one of miocardial infarction and one of massive stroke. Pertinent follow up data and survival were not available. Conclusions: The method enables the surgeon to remove the lymph nodes no. 10 along with 11p and 11d without needing to sacrifice the spleen. All spleens were reattached sucessfully using the preserved spleno-renal ligament fold, no wandering spleen was noticed.

背景:多项研究显示,保留脾脏对消化系统癌症患者,尤其是胃癌患者有重要益处。在局部晚期胃癌病例中,微创方法仍存在争议,而开放方法仍具有重要作用。本文旨在描述和介绍一种开放式手术技术的可行性,该技术可在保留脾脏和脾血管的情况下切除 10 号站以及 11p 和 11d,适用于接受开放式手术的患者。材料和方法:我们介绍了一种开放式 "原位 "脾脏和胰腺保留手术技术,该技术可在胃上三分之二局部晚期胃癌病例中切除脾门前后神经节、脾血管和远端胰腺。自 2003 年以来,作者在多个中心连续为 43 名患者进行了手术。10 淋巴腺切除术。结果:无需切除脾脏。术后多普勒超声和 CT 扫描显示,所有脾脏均存活。没有脾脏移位或引起机械并发症。临床上未发现明显的胰漏。两名患者在住院期间死亡,一名死于心肌梗死,一名死于大面积中风。相关随访数据和存活率不详。结论:该方法使外科医生能够切除 10 号淋巴结以及 11p 和 11d 淋巴结。10 号淋巴结以及 11p 和 11d,而无需牺牲脾脏。所有脾脏都利用保留的脾肾韧带褶成功再接,没有发现脾脏游走。
{"title":"Ex-situ Open Approach Spleen Preserving Splenic Hilum Lymphadenectomy.","authors":"Sever Calin Moldovan","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.330","DOIUrl":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> multiple studies showed important benefices arising from splenic preservation in patients with digestive cancer in general and gastric cancer in particular. The minimally invasive approach remains controversial in locally advanced gastric cancer cases whilst the open approach still has an important role. This paper's aim is to describe and present the feasibility of an open surgical technique that allows removing stations 10 together with 11p and 11d with spleen and splenic vessels preservation in pacients operated upon by open surgery. Material and <b>Methods:</b> We present an open \"Ex-situ\" spleen and pancreas preserving surgical technique that removes the anterior and posterior ganglia from the splenic hilum, the splenic vessels and the distal pancreas in locally advanced gastric cancer cases of the upper two thirds of the stomach. Forty-three consecutive patients since 2003 were operated upon by the author in multiple centers. during upper two thirds gastric cancer resections requiring no. 10 lymphadenectomy. <b>Results:</b> no splenectomy was needed . All the spleens were viable at postoperative Doppler echography and CT scans. No spleen migrated nor caused mechanical complications. No clinically significant pancreatic leaks were noticed. Two patients died during hospital stay, one of miocardial infarction and one of massive stroke. Pertinent follow up data and survival were not available. <b>Conclusions:</b> The method enables the surgeon to remove the lymph nodes no. 10 along with 11p and 11d without needing to sacrifice the spleen. All spleens were reattached sucessfully using the preserved spleno-renal ligament fold, no wandering spleen was noticed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"330-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aesthetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction in Laparoscopic vs. Open Incisional Hernia Repair: Have We Asked the Patients? 腹腔镜与开腹切口疝修补术的美学效果和患者满意度:我们询问过患者吗?
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.260
Draga-Maria Mandi, Florin Andrei Grama, Andrei Popa, Dan-Eduard Giuvara, Radu Constantin Turluianu, Andreea-Corina Ilie-Petrov, Chitul Andrei, Razvan Scaunasu, Traean Burcos, Daniel Alin Cristian

Background: Incisional hernias are predominantly treated through open or laparoscopic surgery, with each method influencing recovery and patient-reported outcomes. This underscores the need for reliable assessment tools such as the EuraHS-QoL questionnaire to evaluate quality of life after surgery. Methods: This prospective single-center study was aimed at evaluating aestethic outcomes and patient satisfaction following laparoscopic versus open hernia repair. It involved 222 patients categorized by type of approach. The EuraHS-QoL questionnaire was used preoperatively and at 1- and 3-months post-surgery, with data analysis performed using Origin Pro 2018 and SPSS software version 28.0. Results: Among the participants, 152 were females and 70 males, with 78% undergoing open surgery and 22% laparoscopic. Findings revealed superior patient outcomes with laparoscopic repair in terms of pain management, daily activities, and aesthetic satisfaction. Patients reported significantly lower pain levels and fewer restrictions in daily activities post-laparoscopic surgery. While initial postoperative cosmetic results favored laparoscopic methods, the perceived differences in abdominal shape diminished over time. Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair significantly improves quality of life compared to open surgery, as shown by EuraHS-QoL scores. These results support the use of laparoscopic techniques in appropriate cases due to their benefits in pain reduction and faster functional recovery.

背景:切口疝主要通过开腹或腹腔镜手术进行治疗,每种方法都会影响术后恢复和患者报告的结果。因此,需要可靠的评估工具(如 EuraHS-QoL 问卷)来评估手术后的生活质量。研究方法这项前瞻性单中心研究旨在评估腹腔镜与开腹疝气修复术后的美学效果和患者满意度。共有 222 名患者参与了这项研究,并按手术方式进行了分类。在术前、术后 1 个月和 3 个月时使用 EuraHS-QoL 问卷,并使用 Origin Pro 2018 和 SPSS 软件 28.0 版进行数据分析。结果:参与者中,女性152人,男性70人,78%接受开腹手术,22%接受腹腔镜手术。研究结果显示,腹腔镜修复术在疼痛控制、日常活动和美学满意度方面对患者的治疗效果更佳。患者表示腹腔镜手术后疼痛程度明显降低,日常活动受到的限制也更少。虽然最初的术后美容效果更倾向于腹腔镜方法,但随着时间的推移,腹部形状的明显差异逐渐减小。结论:从 EuraHS-QoL 评分来看,腹腔镜修复术比开腹手术明显改善了生活质量。这些结果支持在适当的病例中使用腹腔镜技术,因为腹腔镜技术具有减轻疼痛和加快功能恢复的优点。
{"title":"Aesthetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction in Laparoscopic vs. Open Incisional Hernia Repair: Have We Asked the Patients?","authors":"Draga-Maria Mandi, Florin Andrei Grama, Andrei Popa, Dan-Eduard Giuvara, Radu Constantin Turluianu, Andreea-Corina Ilie-Petrov, Chitul Andrei, Razvan Scaunasu, Traean Burcos, Daniel Alin Cristian","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Incisional hernias are predominantly treated through open or laparoscopic surgery, with each method influencing recovery and patient-reported outcomes. This underscores the need for reliable assessment tools such as the EuraHS-QoL questionnaire to evaluate quality of life after surgery. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective single-center study was aimed at evaluating aestethic outcomes and patient satisfaction following laparoscopic versus open hernia repair. It involved 222 patients categorized by type of approach. The EuraHS-QoL questionnaire was used preoperatively and at 1- and 3-months post-surgery, with data analysis performed using Origin Pro 2018 and SPSS software version 28.0. <b>Results:</b> Among the participants, 152 were females and 70 males, with 78% undergoing open surgery and 22% laparoscopic. Findings revealed superior patient outcomes with laparoscopic repair in terms of pain management, daily activities, and aesthetic satisfaction. Patients reported significantly lower pain levels and fewer restrictions in daily activities post-laparoscopic surgery. While initial postoperative cosmetic results favored laparoscopic methods, the perceived differences in abdominal shape diminished over time. <b>Conclusions:</b> Laparoscopic repair significantly improves quality of life compared to open surgery, as shown by EuraHS-QoL scores. These results support the use of laparoscopic techniques in appropriate cases due to their benefits in pain reduction and faster functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"260-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Systematic Review. 增强腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术后恢复 - 系统性综述。
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.318
Antonio Mihai Istrate, Dragos Serban, Horia Doran, Corneliu Tudor, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Dan Dumitrescu, Andrei Popescu, Matei Popa Cherecheanu, Ciprian Tanasescu, Ion Motofei

Background and aim: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a modern concept that aims to improve the perioperative patient care by implementing an evidence-based, patient-centered team approach. This paper aims to analyze the outcome, variations and limits of the ERAS-protocols used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic review on PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science to document the outcomes of applying various ERAS protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers, totaling 1453 patients that underwent LC, were included in the qualitative analysis. ERAS-protocols applied in those studies include various pre-, intra- and postoperative measures intended to boost the surgical recovery of the patients and shorten their hospital stay, without exposing them to hazardous encounters. Results: Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within an ERAS-specific protocol are proven to have lower levels of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, with no statistically significant risk of postoperative complications. The postoperative results show that ERAS-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, that may shorten the postoperative recovery after LC. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to establish a consensus regarding the perioperative protocol, before implementing ERAS for LC in clinical routine.

背景和目的:术后加强恢复(ERAS)是一个现代概念,旨在通过实施以证据为基础、以患者为中心的团队方法来改善围手术期患者护理。本文旨在分析用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 ERAS 方案的结果、变化和局限性。方法:我们在 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Web of Science 上进行了系统性综述,记录了在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中应用各种 ERAS 方案的结果。采用纳入和排除标准后,共有 8 篇论文被纳入定性分析,共涉及 1453 名接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。这些研究中采用的 ERAS 方案包括各种术前、术中和术后措施,旨在促进患者的手术恢复并缩短住院时间,同时避免患者遭遇危险。研究结果在 ERAS 特定方案下接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者术后疼痛、恶心和呕吐的程度较低,术后并发症的风险也没有统计学意义。术后结果表明,ERAS-腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种可行且安全的手术,可缩短胆囊切除术后的恢复期。结论:在临床常规实施ERAS胆囊切除术之前,还需要进一步研究,就围术期方案达成共识。
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Antonio Mihai Istrate, Dragos Serban, Horia Doran, Corneliu Tudor, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Dan Dumitrescu, Andrei Popescu, Matei Popa Cherecheanu, Ciprian Tanasescu, Ion Motofei","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.318","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a modern concept that aims to improve the perioperative patient care by implementing an evidence-based, patient-centered team approach. This paper aims to analyze the outcome, variations and limits of the ERAS-protocols used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a systematic review on PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science to document the outcomes of applying various ERAS protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers, totaling 1453 patients that underwent LC, were included in the qualitative analysis. ERAS-protocols applied in those studies include various pre-, intra- and postoperative measures intended to boost the surgical recovery of the patients and shorten their hospital stay, without exposing them to hazardous encounters. <b>Results:</b> Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within an ERAS-specific protocol are proven to have lower levels of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, with no statistically significant risk of postoperative complications. The postoperative results show that ERAS-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, that may shorten the postoperative recovery after LC. <b>Conclusions:</b> Further studies are needed to establish a consensus regarding the perioperative protocol, before implementing ERAS for LC in clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"318-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of Two Treatment Modalities for Post-surgical Pain after Hemorrhoidectomy. 分析两种治疗痔疮切除术后疼痛的方法
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247
Sergio Susmallian, Iris Aviv, Irena Babis, Eran Segal

Background: This non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of two pharmacological treatments, "around-the-clock" analgesic treatment (ACAT) and "on-demand" analgesic treatment (ODAT), for managing postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy. Material and Methods: The study, conducted from July 2016 to December 2020, included 5335 hemorrhoidectomy patients. Participants were divided into ACAT (3767) and ODAT (1568) groups. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182). Results: Patients had a mean age of 47.47 years, with 59.98% males. Postoperatively, 14.13% reported severe pain, 36.49% moderate, 34.28% mild, and 15.09% no pain. ACAT group's maximum pain was 3.04 (VAS), ODAT 4.95 (p; average pain was 0.79 (ACAT) and 1.45 (ODAT). Discharge pain was 0.42 (ACAT) and 0.63 (ODAT) VAS. The ACAT group consistently reported lower levels of pain across all measured instances. Higher BMI and younger age were pain risk factors (p=.049, p .001 respectively). ACAT administration resulted in reduced opioid usage, with meperidine showing a 68.38% decrease, morphine 43.57% less, tramadol 46.82% less, oxycodone reduced by 38.74%, and codeine by 53.40%. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics was notably lower in the ACAT group, ranging from 16% to 59% less compared to the ODAT group. Conclusion: Hemorrhoidectomy induces moderate postoperative pain, with only 14% experiencing severe pain. A fixed schedule multimodal pain regimen, regardless of procedure and anesthesia type, reduces pain from moderate to mild post-hemorrhoidectomy. This approach also decreases opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements. Higher BMI and younger age are identified as risk factors for elevated postoperative pain.

研究背景这项非随机研究旨在比较 "全天候 "镇痛治疗(ACAT)和 "按需 "镇痛治疗(ODAT)这两种药物治疗在控制痔切除术后疼痛方面的疗效。材料与方法:研究于 2016 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月进行,共纳入 5335 名痔切除术患者。参与者被分为 ACAT 组(3767 人)和 ODAT 组(1568 人)。该研究已在 clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182)上注册。研究结果患者平均年龄 47.47 岁,男性占 59.98%。术后,14.13%的患者报告有剧烈疼痛,36.49%为中度疼痛,34.28%为轻度疼痛,15.09%为无痛。ACAT 组的最大疼痛为 3.04(VAS),ODAT 组为 4.95(p;平均疼痛为 0.79(ACAT)和 1.45(ODAT)。出院时的 VAS 疼痛分别为 0.42(ACAT)和 0.63(ODAT)。在所有测量实例中,ACAT 组报告的疼痛程度始终较低。较高的体重指数和较年轻的年龄是疼痛的危险因素(分别为 p=.049 和 p .001)。使用 ACAT 可减少阿片类药物的使用,其中甲哌丁减少了 68.38%,吗啡减少了 43.57%,曲马多减少了 46.82%,羟考酮减少了 38.74%,可待因减少了 53.40%。此外,与 ODAT 组相比,ACAT 组非阿片类镇痛药的使用明显减少,减少幅度从 16% 到 59% 不等。结论痔疮切除术会引起中度术后疼痛,只有 14% 的患者会感到剧烈疼痛。无论手术过程和麻醉类型如何,固定时间表的多模式止痛方案都能将痔疮切除术后的疼痛从中度减轻到轻度。这种方法还能减少对阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药的需求。较高的体重指数和较年轻的年龄被认为是术后疼痛加剧的风险因素。
{"title":"Analysis of Two Treatment Modalities for Post-surgical Pain after Hemorrhoidectomy.","authors":"Sergio Susmallian, Iris Aviv, Irena Babis, Eran Segal","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247","DOIUrl":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of two pharmacological treatments, \"around-the-clock\" analgesic treatment (ACAT) and \"on-demand\" analgesic treatment (ODAT), for managing postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy. Material and <b>Methods:</b> The study, conducted from July 2016 to December 2020, included 5335 hemorrhoidectomy patients. Participants were divided into ACAT (3767) and ODAT (1568) groups. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182). <b>Results:</b> Patients had a mean age of 47.47 years, with 59.98% males. Postoperatively, 14.13% reported severe pain, 36.49% moderate, 34.28% mild, and 15.09% no pain. ACAT group's maximum pain was 3.04 (VAS), ODAT 4.95 (p; average pain was 0.79 (ACAT) and 1.45 (ODAT). Discharge pain was 0.42 (ACAT) and 0.63 (ODAT) VAS. The ACAT group consistently reported lower levels of pain across all measured instances. Higher BMI and younger age were pain risk factors (p=.049, p .001 respectively). ACAT administration resulted in reduced opioid usage, with meperidine showing a 68.38% decrease, morphine 43.57% less, tramadol 46.82% less, oxycodone reduced by 38.74%, and codeine by 53.40%. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics was notably lower in the ACAT group, ranging from 16% to 59% less compared to the ODAT group. Conclusion: Hemorrhoidectomy induces moderate postoperative pain, with only 14% experiencing severe pain. A fixed schedule multimodal pain regimen, regardless of procedure and anesthesia type, reduces pain from moderate to mild post-hemorrhoidectomy. This approach also decreases opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements. Higher BMI and younger age are identified as risk factors for elevated postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"247-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic Factors in Liver Transplant with Marginal Grafts - Review of the Literature. 边缘移植物肝移植的预后因素 - 文献综述。
IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.119.eC.2987
Maria Serban, Irina Balescu, Sorin Petrea, Bogdan Gaspar, Lucian Pop, Valentin Varlas, Adrian Hasegan, Gabriel Petre Gorecki, Cristina Martac, Marilena Stoian, Nicolae Bacalbasa

Liver transplantation is the last life-saving solution for patients with end stage liver disease. The low number of available liver grafts and the increasing waiting time on transplant lists have led to the appearance of extended donation criteria and the marginal grafs, initially considered suboptimal. Allocation of grafts and identification of the most suitable "donor-recipient" pair is still under development. The fact is that the appearance of marginal grafts has expanded the donation lists and seems to have a prognosis at least comparable to the use of ideal grafts.

肝移植是终末期肝病患者最后的救命手段。可用肝脏移植物的数量很少,移植名单上的等待时间越来越长,因此出现了扩展捐赠标准和边缘移植物(最初被认为是次优的)。移植物的分配和确定最合适的 "捐赠者-受者 "配对仍在发展之中。事实上,边缘移植物的出现扩大了捐献名单,其预后似乎至少可与理想移植物相媲美。
{"title":"Prognostic Factors in Liver Transplant with Marginal Grafts - Review of the Literature.","authors":"Maria Serban, Irina Balescu, Sorin Petrea, Bogdan Gaspar, Lucian Pop, Valentin Varlas, Adrian Hasegan, Gabriel Petre Gorecki, Cristina Martac, Marilena Stoian, Nicolae Bacalbasa","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.119.eC.2987","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.119.eC.2987","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver transplantation is the last life-saving solution for patients with end stage liver disease. The low number of available liver grafts and the increasing waiting time on transplant lists have led to the appearance of extended donation criteria and the marginal grafs, initially considered suboptimal. Allocation of grafts and identification of the most suitable \"donor-recipient\" pair is still under development. The fact is that the appearance of marginal grafts has expanded the donation lists and seems to have a prognosis at least comparable to the use of ideal grafts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 eCollection","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141619465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advantages of Laparoscopic Treatment in Pelvic Static Disorders by Lateral Hystero/Colpopexy - A Single Center Experience. 盆腔静力障碍的腹腔镜治疗优势--单中心经验。
IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.2.p.211
Irina Niţu, Vasile Sârbu, Silvia Savin, Silvia Șerban, Stelu Popescu, Teodor Ștefan Niţu, Maria-Sabina Neacşu

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse is the most frequent and common health problem faced by most patients, representing the descent into the vagina or beyond the introitus of one or more pelvic organs, involving three compartments: anterior-bladder, apical-uterus and posterior-rectus. Lateral hystero/colpopexy is an alternative approach in the repair of symptomatic anterior and apical pelvic prolapse. The main objective is to correct pelvic floor defects, restore anatomy, relieve pressure and maintain normal sexual function. Material and Methods: Surgical intervention was applied to patients with prolapse greater than grade II according to the international prolapse quantification system (POP-Q). For apical, anterior prolapse, the bladder peritoneum is dissected and a polypropylene mesh is fitted to the round ligaments with suspension of the isthmus and cervix and fixation of the mesh with CapSure tacks followed by closure of the vaginal peritoneum. Results: During the performance of the technique I had no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conservation of the uterus proved to be effective for prolapse correction, significant improvements in patient quality of life, frequency of nocturia, degree of dyspareunia and urgency symptoms were observed. Conclusion: Uterine preservation by lateral hystero/colpopexy is a new, feasible and successful method for treating prolapse.

简介盆腔器官脱垂是大多数患者面临的最常见的健康问题,是指一个或多个盆腔器官脱入阴道或脱出内口,涉及三个部位:前方-膀胱、顶端-子宫和后方-直肠。侧子宫/卵巢切除术是修复有症状的前部和顶部盆腔脱垂的另一种方法。其主要目的是矫正盆底缺陷、恢复解剖结构、减轻压力并维持正常的性功能。材料和方法:根据国际脱垂量化系统(POP-Q),手术干预适用于脱垂程度大于 II 级的患者。对于顶端、前方脱垂的患者,先剥离膀胱腹膜,将聚丙烯网片安装到圆韧带上,悬吊峡部和宫颈,用 CapSure 钉固定网片,然后缝合阴道腹膜。结果:在实施该技术的过程中,我没有出现术中或术后并发症。事实证明,保留子宫能有效矫正子宫脱垂,患者的生活质量、夜尿次数、排尿困难程度和尿急症状都有明显改善。结论通过侧切子宫/卵巢切除术保留子宫是治疗脱垂的一种新的、可行且成功的方法。
{"title":"Advantages of Laparoscopic Treatment in Pelvic Static Disorders by Lateral Hystero/Colpopexy - A Single Center Experience.","authors":"Irina Niţu, Vasile Sârbu, Silvia Savin, Silvia Șerban, Stelu Popescu, Teodor Ștefan Niţu, Maria-Sabina Neacşu","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.2.p.211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.2.p.211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Pelvic organ prolapse is the most frequent and common health problem faced by most patients, representing the descent into the vagina or beyond the introitus of one or more pelvic organs, involving three compartments: anterior-bladder, apical-uterus and posterior-rectus. Lateral hystero/colpopexy is an alternative approach in the repair of symptomatic anterior and apical pelvic prolapse. The main objective is to correct pelvic floor defects, restore anatomy, relieve pressure and maintain normal sexual function. Material and <b>Methods:</b> Surgical intervention was applied to patients with prolapse greater than grade II according to the international prolapse quantification system (POP-Q). For apical, anterior prolapse, the bladder peritoneum is dissected and a polypropylene mesh is fitted to the round ligaments with suspension of the isthmus and cervix and fixation of the mesh with CapSure tacks followed by closure of the vaginal peritoneum. <b>Results:</b> During the performance of the technique I had no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conservation of the uterus proved to be effective for prolapse correction, significant improvements in patient quality of life, frequency of nocturia, degree of dyspareunia and urgency symptoms were observed. Conclusion: Uterine preservation by lateral hystero/colpopexy is a new, feasible and successful method for treating prolapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 2","pages":"211-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140920798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Chirurgia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1