Circulation: Heart Failure最新文献

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) can stem from multiple causes and portends poor prognosis. Prior studies have focused on acute myocardial infarction-CS; however, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF)-CS accounts for most cases. We studied patients suffering ADHF-CS to identify clinical factors, early in their trajectory, associated with a higher probability of successful outcomes.

Methods: Consecutive patients with CS were evaluated (N=1162). We studied patients who developed ADHF-CS at our hospital (N=562). Primary end point was native heart survival (NHS), defined as survival to discharge without receiving advanced HF therapies. Secondary end points were adverse events, survival, major cardiac interventions, and hospital readmissions within 1 year following index hospitalization discharge. Association of clinical data with NHS was analyzed using logistic regression.

Results: Overall, 357 (63.5%) patients achieved NHS, 165 (29.2%) died, and 41 (7.3%) were discharged post advanced HF therapies. Of 398 discharged patients (70.8%), 303 (53.9%) were alive at 1 year. Patients with NHS less commonly suffered cardiac arrest, underwent intubation or pulmonary artery catheter placement, or received temporary mechanical circulatory support, had better hemodynamic and echocardiographic profiles, and had a lower vasoactive-inotropic score at shock onset. Bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, hemolysis in patients with mechanical circulatory support, and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy were less common compared with patients who died or received advanced HF therapies. After multivariable adjustments, clinical variables associated with NHS likelihood included younger age, history of systemic hypertension, absence of cardiac arrest or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy, lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and vasoactive-inotropic score, and higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion at shock onset (all P<0.05).

Conclusions: By studying contemporary patients with ADHF-CS, we identified clinical factors that can inform clinical management and provide future research targets. Right ventricular function, renal function, pulmonary artery catheter placement, and type and timing of temporary mechanical circulatory support warrant further investigation to improve outcomes of this devastating condition.

Background: Pleural effusion is present in 50% to 80% of patients with acute heart failure, depending on image modality. We aim to describe the association between the presence and size of pleural effusion and central hemodynamics, including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) in an advanced heart failure population.

Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study in a cohort of patients with advanced heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%) who underwent right heart catheterization at The Department of Cardiology at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between January 1, 2002 and October 31, 2020. The presence and size of pleural effusion were determined by a semiquantitative score of chest x-rays or computed tomography scans performed within 2 days of right heart catheterization.

Results: In 346 patients (50±13 years; 78% males) with median left ventricular ejection fraction of 20% (15-25), we identified 162 (47%) with pleural effusion. The pleural effusion size was medium in 38 (24%) and large in 30 (19%). Patients with pleural effusion had a 4.3 mm Hg (2.5-6.1) higher PCWP and 2.4 mm Hg (1.2-3.6) higher central venous pressure (P<0.001 for both). Patients with a medium/large pleural effusion had statistically significantly higher filling pressures than patients with a small effusion. Higher PCWP (odds ratio [OR], 1.06 [1.03-1.10]) and central venous pressure (OR, 1.09 [1.05-1.15]) were associated with pleural effusion in multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and heart failure medications (P<0.001 for both). In a subgroup of 204 (63%) patients with serum albumin data, PCWP (OR, 1.06 [1.01-1.11]; P=0.032), central venous pressure (OR, 1.14 [1.06-1.23]; P<0.001) and serum albumin level (OR, 0.89 [0.83-0.95]; P<0.001) were independently associated with the presence of a medium/large-sized pleural effusion.

Conclusions: In patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% undergoing right heart catheterization as part of advanced heart failure work-up, pleural effusion was associated with higher PCWP and central venous pressure and lower serum albumin.

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remains near 40%. In addition to inadequate cardiac output, patients with severe CS may exhibit vasodilation. We aimed to examine the prevalence and consequences of vasodilation in CS.

Methods: We analyzed all patients hospitalized at a CS referral center who were diagnosed with CS stages B to E and did not have concurrent sepsis or recent cardiac surgery. Vasodilation was defined by lower systemic vascular resistance (SVR), higher norepinephrine equivalent dose, or a blunted SVR response to pressors. Threshold SVR values were determined by their relation to 14-day mortality in spline models. The primary outcome was death within 14 days of CS onset in multivariable-adjusted Cox models.

Results: This study included 713 patients with a mean age of 60 years and 27% females; 14-day mortality was 28%, and 38% were vasodilated. The median SVR was 1308 dynes•s•cm^-5 (interquartile range, 870-1652), median norepinephrine equivalent was 0.11 µg/kg per minute (interquartile range, 0-0.2), and 28% had a blunted pressor response. Each 100-dynes•s•cm^-5 decrease in SVR below 800 was associated with 20% higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; P=0.004). Each 0.1-µg/kg per minute increase in norepinephrine equivalent dose was associated with 15% higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; P<0.001). A blunted pressor response was associated with a nearly 2-fold mortality increase (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.74; P=0.003).

Conclusions: Pathophysiologic vasodilation is prevalent in CS and independently associated with an increased risk of death. CS vasodilation can be identified by SVR <800 dynes•s•cm^-5, high doses of pressors, or a blunted SVR response to pressors. Additional studies exploring mechanisms and treatments for CS vasodilation are needed.

Obesity is a significant risk factor for heart failure (HF) development, particularly HF with preserved ejection fraction and as a result, many patients with HF also have obesity. There is growing clinical interest in optimizing strategies for the management of obesity in patients with HF across the spectrums of both ejection fraction and disease severity. The emergence of anti-obesity medications with cardiovascular outcomes benefits, principally glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, has made it possible to study the impact of anti-obesity medications for patients with baseline cardiovascular conditions, including HF. However, clinical trials data supporting the safety and efficacy of treating obesity in patients with HF is currently limited to patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, but do confirm safety and weight loss efficacy in this patient population as well as improvements in HF functional status, biomarkers of inflammation and HF stability. Here, we review the current data available surrounding the management of obesity for patients with HF, including the limitations of this evidence and ongoing areas for investigation, summarize the next phase of emerging anti-obesity medications and provide practical clinical advice for the multidisciplinary management of patients with both HF and obesity.

Background: The PARAGON-HF study (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) investigated the effect of sacubitril-valsartan in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. The results, which were analyzed using conventional statistical methods, did not find a significant reduction in the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death and total hospitalization for HF. Recent clinical trials used win ratio statistics that enable the incorporation of multiple outcome aspects into the primary end point and can detect positive outcomes with fewer patients. In this study, we assessed the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on outcomes using the win ratio to analyze results from patients included in the PARAGON-HF study.

Methods: In the PARAGON-HF study, 4822 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction were randomized either to sacubitril-valsartan or valsartan groups. In the present study, the primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of time to cardiovascular death, total number of hospitalization for HF, time to first hospitalization for HF, time to renal composite outcome, and change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score at 8 months analyzed using a win ratio statistical model.

Results: Using this approach, we found that a greater number of patients who received sacubitril-valsartan experienced clinical benefits compared with those who received valsartan (win ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]; P=0.005). This clinical advantage was evident in patients regardless of whether the left ventricular ejection fraction was above or below the median, that is, the left ventricular ejection fraction of 57%, and regardless of sex (P_interaction=0.76 for the left ventricular ejection fraction and 0.73 for sex).

Conclusions: Employing the innovative win ratio approach, sacubitril-valsartan demonstrated significant clinical benefits among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Notably, this benefit was observed irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction and sex.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.