首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Cardiology最新文献

英文 中文
Trends in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease-Related Mortality in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation (1999–2023): A CDC WONDER Database Analysis 老年房颤患者慢性缺血性心脏病相关死亡率趋势(1999-2023):CDC WONDER数据库分析
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70267
Muhammad Shaheer Bin Faheem, Syed Tawassul Hassan, Tehreem Asghar, Nafila Zeeshan, Sumaya Samadi

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common and persistent type of arrhythmia that frequently co-exists with chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD), increasing the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. We aim to analyze chronic IHD-related mortality trends in patients with AF from 1999 to 2023 in the United States (U.S.).

Methods

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database was used to conduct a retrospective analysis of death records of adults (aged 65 ≤) with chronic IHD as the underlying cause and co-existent AF as a contributing cause of death. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100 000 population and annual percent changes (APC) in age-adjusted mortality rates were determined and measured across different demographics and geographies in the U.S.

Results

AF was recorded in almost 460,196 deaths caused by chronic IHD. The AAMR increased from 38.2 in 1999 to 52.2 in 2023, showing a prominent increase shift from 2010 to 2023 (APC: 2.72). Recorded AAMR in Males (54.8) was doubled that of females (33.2), while a top AAMR of 44.7 was seen in non-Hispanic (NH) Whites was doubled that of other racial/ethnic groups. Geographically, AAMR was higher in non-metropolitan areas (43.3) and the Northeast region (42.8).

Conclusions

Proper resource distribution and more targeted interventions are needed to address the rising trends in chronic IHD mortality among AF patients across different geographic and demographic groups.

心房颤动(AF)是最常见和持续的心律失常类型,经常与慢性缺血性心脏病(IHD)共存,增加了不良心血管结局和死亡率的风险。我们的目的是分析1999年至2023年美国房颤患者慢性ihd相关死亡率趋势。方法:使用美国疾病控制与预防中心广泛的流行病学研究在线数据(CDC WONDER)数据库,对慢性IHD为潜在病因、并发房颤为主要死因的成人(65岁≤)的死亡记录进行回顾性分析。测定并测量了美国不同人口统计和地区每10万人的年龄调整死亡率(AAMR)和年龄调整死亡率的年百分比变化(APC)。结果:慢性IHD导致的近460,196例死亡中记录了AF。AAMR由1999年的38.2增加到2023年的52.2,在2010 - 2023年表现出明显的上升趋势(APC: 2.72)。男性的AAMR(54.8)是女性(33.2)的两倍,而非西班牙裔(NH)白人的AAMR最高为44.7,是其他种族/族裔群体的两倍。从地理上看,非大都市地区(43.3)和东北地区(42.8)的AAMR较高。结论:需要适当的资源分配和更有针对性的干预措施来解决不同地理和人口群体AF患者慢性IHD死亡率上升的趋势。
{"title":"Trends in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease-Related Mortality in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation (1999–2023): A CDC WONDER Database Analysis","authors":"Muhammad Shaheer Bin Faheem,&nbsp;Syed Tawassul Hassan,&nbsp;Tehreem Asghar,&nbsp;Nafila Zeeshan,&nbsp;Sumaya Samadi","doi":"10.1002/clc.70267","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70267","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common and persistent type of arrhythmia that frequently co-exists with chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD), increasing the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. We aim to analyze chronic IHD-related mortality trends in patients with AF from 1999 to 2023 in the United States (U.S.).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database was used to conduct a retrospective analysis of death records of adults (aged 65 ≤) with chronic IHD as the underlying cause and co-existent AF as a contributing cause of death. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100 000 population and annual percent changes (APC) in age-adjusted mortality rates were determined and measured across different demographics and geographies in the U.S.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>AF was recorded in almost 460,196 deaths caused by chronic IHD. The AAMR increased from 38.2 in 1999 to 52.2 in 2023, showing a prominent increase shift from 2010 to 2023 (APC: 2.72). Recorded AAMR in Males (54.8) was doubled that of females (33.2), while a top AAMR of 44.7 was seen in non-Hispanic (NH) Whites was doubled that of other racial/ethnic groups. Geographically, AAMR was higher in non-metropolitan areas (43.3) and the Northeast region (42.8).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Proper resource distribution and more targeted interventions are needed to address the rising trends in chronic IHD mortality among AF patients across different geographic and demographic groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methodological Considerations in Evaluating CTRP12 as a Biomarker for In-Stent Restenosis 评价CTRP12作为支架内再狭窄生物标志物的方法学考虑。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70271
Saleha Khattak, Syed Muhammad Rayyan, Syed Huzaifa Khan
<p>We read with great interest the study by Botao Zhao and Yuchan Shen, which evaluates changes in serum CTRP12 in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after the treatment of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its relationship with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The authors have addressed an emerging area of vascular biology and present CTRP12 as a possible biomarker with significant prognostic value. Although the findings are intriguing and novel, some aspects of the study must be discussed to appropriately contextualize the conclusions [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The selection of patients for the ISR group relied on follow-up coronary angiography rather than protocol-mandated, systematic surveillance [<span>2</span>]. As patients who undergo repeat angiography are more likely to be symptomatic or high risk, this raises the possibility that the observed association between CTRP12 levels and ISR may reflect correlations with severity of the disease or symptom burden instead of true anatomical restenosis, potentially overstating the stated predictive ability of the biomarker.</p><p>Next, the study does not establish CTRP12 as an independent predictor of ISR. The lack of a multivariable model limits the interpretation of the results as validated predictors of ISR, such as angiographic disease severity (e.g., Gensini score), inflammatory markers like hs-CRP, and clinical risk factors were not adjusted for [<span>3</span>]. Without demonstrating incremental prognostic value beyond these existing variables, CTRP12 may present as a mediator of underlying inflammation or disease burden rather than an independent biomarker [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Moreover, the immediate post-PCI period is marked by acute vascular injury, endothelial disruption, and inflammatory activation related to balloon inflation and stent deployment. Hence, changes in CTRP12 levels at 24 hours post-procedure indicate acute procedural trauma rather than mechanisms directly involved in the longer-term development of ISR [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Also, procedural factors such as total stent length, number of stents implanted, lesion complexity, and duration of balloon inflation are known to influence inflammatory responses and ISR risk. Such variables were not accounted for; therefore, lower CTRP12 levels may simply reflect more complex or injurious interventions [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Lastly, the single-center design with a relatively limited sample size restricts external validity. The optimal cut-off values concluded from a single population may not be generalizable across other demographics. External validation in independent and multicenter cohorts is essential before CTRP12 can be considered for clinical practice.</p><p>In summary, while the study contributes valuable data on CTRP12 and its prognostic value, verification bias, absence of a multivariable model, ambiguity related to the timing of biomarker measurement, and possible restricted generalizability hinder the str
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了赵伯涛和沈玉婵的研究,研究了冠心病(CAD)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后血清CTRP12的变化及其与支架内再狭窄(ISR)的关系。作者已经解决了血管生物学的一个新兴领域,并提出CTRP12作为一个可能的生物标志物具有显著的预后价值。尽管这些发现是有趣和新颖的,但必须讨论研究的某些方面,以适当地将结论置于背景中。ISR组患者的选择依赖于随访冠状动脉造影,而不是协议规定的系统监测。由于接受重复血管造影的患者更有可能出现症状或高风险,这就提出了观察到的CTRP12水平和ISR之间的关联可能反映了疾病严重程度或症状负担的相关性,而不是真正的解剖性再狭窄,这可能夸大了生物标志物的预测能力。其次,该研究没有建立CTRP12作为ISR的独立预测因子。缺乏多变量模型限制了将结果解释为ISR的有效预测因子,如血管造影疾病严重程度(如Gensini评分)、炎症标志物(如hs-CRP)和临床危险因素未针对[3]进行调整。除了这些现有的变量之外,没有显示出增加的预后价值,CTRP12可能作为潜在炎症或疾病负担的中介,而不是独立的生物标志物[4]。此外,pci术后立即出现急性血管损伤、内皮破坏和与球囊膨胀和支架部署相关的炎症激活。因此,术后24小时CTRP12水平的变化表明急性程序性创伤,而不是直接参与ISR bb0长期发展的机制。此外,手术因素如支架总长度、植入支架数量、病变复杂性和球囊膨胀持续时间也会影响炎症反应和ISR风险。这些变量没有被考虑在内;因此,较低的CTRP12水平可能仅仅反映了更复杂或更有害的干预措施[10]。最后,单中心设计和相对有限的样本量限制了外部效度。从单一人群得出的最佳临界值可能无法推广到其他人口统计数据。在考虑CTRP12用于临床实践之前,独立和多中心队列的外部验证是必不可少的。综上所述,尽管该研究为CTRP12及其预后价值提供了有价值的数据,但验证偏差、缺乏多变量模型、与生物标志物测量时间相关的模糊性以及可能受限制的推广性阻碍了其结论的强度。在未来的研究中解决这些局限性对于确定CTRP12在冠状动脉介入治疗中的临床实际应用至关重要。所有作者都阅读并批准了最终稿件。作者没有得到这项工作的特别资助。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。作者没有什么可报告的。
{"title":"Methodological Considerations in Evaluating CTRP12 as a Biomarker for In-Stent Restenosis","authors":"Saleha Khattak,&nbsp;Syed Muhammad Rayyan,&nbsp;Syed Huzaifa Khan","doi":"10.1002/clc.70271","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70271","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We read with great interest the study by Botao Zhao and Yuchan Shen, which evaluates changes in serum CTRP12 in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after the treatment of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its relationship with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The authors have addressed an emerging area of vascular biology and present CTRP12 as a possible biomarker with significant prognostic value. Although the findings are intriguing and novel, some aspects of the study must be discussed to appropriately contextualize the conclusions [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The selection of patients for the ISR group relied on follow-up coronary angiography rather than protocol-mandated, systematic surveillance [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. As patients who undergo repeat angiography are more likely to be symptomatic or high risk, this raises the possibility that the observed association between CTRP12 levels and ISR may reflect correlations with severity of the disease or symptom burden instead of true anatomical restenosis, potentially overstating the stated predictive ability of the biomarker.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Next, the study does not establish CTRP12 as an independent predictor of ISR. The lack of a multivariable model limits the interpretation of the results as validated predictors of ISR, such as angiographic disease severity (e.g., Gensini score), inflammatory markers like hs-CRP, and clinical risk factors were not adjusted for [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Without demonstrating incremental prognostic value beyond these existing variables, CTRP12 may present as a mediator of underlying inflammation or disease burden rather than an independent biomarker [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, the immediate post-PCI period is marked by acute vascular injury, endothelial disruption, and inflammatory activation related to balloon inflation and stent deployment. Hence, changes in CTRP12 levels at 24 hours post-procedure indicate acute procedural trauma rather than mechanisms directly involved in the longer-term development of ISR [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, procedural factors such as total stent length, number of stents implanted, lesion complexity, and duration of balloon inflation are known to influence inflammatory responses and ISR risk. Such variables were not accounted for; therefore, lower CTRP12 levels may simply reflect more complex or injurious interventions [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lastly, the single-center design with a relatively limited sample size restricts external validity. The optimal cut-off values concluded from a single population may not be generalizable across other demographics. External validation in independent and multicenter cohorts is essential before CTRP12 can be considered for clinical practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In summary, while the study contributes valuable data on CTRP12 and its prognostic value, verification bias, absence of a multivariable model, ambiguity related to the timing of biomarker measurement, and possible restricted generalizability hinder the str","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865127/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on “Naples Prognostic Score and Clinical Outcomes After PCI for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” 对“那不勒斯预后评分和急性冠脉综合征PCI术后临床结果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析”的评论。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70270
Bin Cao, Rengyun Xiang
<p>We read with interest the meta-analysis by Özen et al. on the Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) in ACS patients undergoing PCI [<span>1</span>]. The study confirms that a higher NPS is associated with increased mortality, no-reflow, and lower LVEF, contributing to the field of biomarker-based risk stratification. We wish to highlight several limitations that merit further discussion.</p><p>First, the study overlooks the methodological limitation of dichotomizing continuous biomarkers. The NPS components (e.g., albumin, NLR) are continuous and may have non-linear relationships with outcomes. Forcing them into binary categories loses gradient risk information and masks component interactions. For instance, different combinations of albumin and NLR levels may yield the same NPS but carry distinct risks. This oversimplification likely contributes to the high heterogeneity observed, particularly for LVEF. Birdal et al. showed that while the high-NPS group had lower LVEF (45.2 ± 8.7% vs. 50.1 ± 8.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), the impact of individual components varied significantly—a nuance obscured by dichotomization [<span>2</span>]. Thus, future studies should treat biomarkers as continuous variables and use advanced models (e.g., splines, machine learning) to capture non-linear relationships and enable personalized risk stratification.</p><p>Second, the study neglects that the NPS's simple summation of nutrition (albumin, cholesterol) and inflammation (NLR, LMR) markers may blur distinct pathophysiologies (“nutritional depletion” vs. “inflammatory storm”). Keskin et al. identified two high-NPS subtypes in NSTEMI patients: a “low-albumin, low-inflammation” group with higher heart failure/infection rates, and a “normal-albumin, high-inflammation” group with higher reinfarction rates [<span>3</span>]. Targeted interventions yielded subtype-specific benefits (nutrition support reduced heart failure risk by 41% in the former; anti-inflammatory therapy reduced reinfarction by 53% in the latter). These critical differences are masked by the total NPS. Future work should use methods like cluster analysis to identify such phenotypes and test targeted therapies, transforming the NPS from a “black-box” score into a actionable phenotyping tool.</p><p>Third, the study underemphasizes that current evidence is largely observational, limiting causal inference. It remains unclear whether a high NPS directly contributes to poor outcomes or merely reflects overall disease severity. Genc et al. found that after adjusting for disease severity markers, the independent association between NPS and prolonged hospitalization was attenuated (p-value increased from < 0.01 to 0.08) [<span>4</span>], suggesting NPS may be a severity marker rather than an independent driver. Therefore, the next step should be prospective validation and randomized trials testing whether NPS-guided interventions improve hard endpoints, elevating it from a predictor to an intervention target.</p><p>F
我们感兴趣地阅读了Özen等人关于接受PCI治疗的ACS患者那不勒斯预后评分(NPS)的荟萃分析。该研究证实,较高的NPS与较高的死亡率、无回流和较低的LVEF相关,有助于基于生物标志物的风险分层领域。我们希望强调值得进一步讨论的若干限制。首先,该研究忽略了连续生物标志物二分法的方法学局限性。NPS成分(如白蛋白、NLR)是连续的,可能与结果有非线性关系。强迫它们进入二元类别会丢失梯度风险信息,并掩盖组件之间的相互作用。例如,白蛋白和NLR水平的不同组合可能产生相同的NPS,但风险不同。这种过度简化可能导致观察到的高度异质性,特别是对于LVEF。Birdal等人的研究表明,虽然高nps组的LVEF较低(45.2±8.7% vs. 50.1±8.2%,p < 0.001),但个体成分的影响差异很大,这种细微差别被二分类模糊了。因此,未来的研究应该将生物标志物视为连续变量,并使用先进的模型(如样条、机器学习)来捕获非线性关系,并实现个性化的风险分层。其次,该研究忽略了NPS对营养(白蛋白、胆固醇)和炎症(NLR、LMR)标记的简单汇总可能模糊了不同的病理生理(“营养耗竭”与“炎症风暴”)。Keskin等人在NSTEMI患者中发现了两种高nps亚型:具有较高心力衰竭/感染率的“低白蛋白、低炎症”组和具有较高再梗死率的“正常白蛋白、高炎症”组。有针对性的干预产生了特定亚型的益处(前者营养支持使心力衰竭风险降低41%;后者抗炎治疗使再梗死风险降低53%)。这些关键的差异被总NPS所掩盖。未来的工作应该使用像聚类分析这样的方法来识别这些表型并测试靶向治疗,将NPS从“黑箱”评分转变为可操作的表型工具。第三,该研究强调,目前的证据主要是观察性的,限制了因果推理。目前尚不清楚高NPS是否直接导致不良结果,还是仅仅反映了整体疾病的严重程度。Genc等人发现,在调整疾病严重程度标志物后,NPS与住院时间延长之间的独立相关性减弱(p值从0.01增加到0.08)[4],这表明NPS可能是一个严重程度标志物,而不是一个独立的驱动因素。因此,下一步应该是前瞻性验证和随机试验,测试nps引导的干预是否能改善硬终点,将其从预测因子提升到干预目标。最后,该研究没有定义临床作用阈值。在确认“高NPS =高风险”的同时,它没有具体说明在什么分数上升级护理或开始哪些干预措施。这一差距限制了其融入临床途径。未来的研究应设计试验(例如,将NPS≥3的患者随机分配到强化和常规护理组),以确定NPS分层管理是否能改善预后,弥合预后关联和临床效用之间的差距。总之,虽然Özen等人系统地证实了NPS的预测价值,但更深层次的问题仍然存在。现在的重点应该从验证关联转移到阐明机制,通过前瞻性/介入性研究增强证据,并通过定义可操作的阈值来验证临床效用。这种转化对于NPS从预后标志物演变为指导ACS个体化管理的工具至关重要。所有作者都对研究的构思和设计做出了贡献。手稿的初稿由曹斌撰写,所有作者都对以前的手稿版本进行了评论。所有的作者都阅读并批准了最终的手稿。作者没有得到这项工作的特别资助。作者声明无利益冲突。本文不生成任何原始数据。支持本研究结果的所有数据都包含在文章中,并来自先前发表的文献,这些文献已被适当引用。
{"title":"Comment on “Naples Prognostic Score and Clinical Outcomes After PCI for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”","authors":"Bin Cao,&nbsp;Rengyun Xiang","doi":"10.1002/clc.70270","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70270","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We read with interest the meta-analysis by Özen et al. on the Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) in ACS patients undergoing PCI [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. The study confirms that a higher NPS is associated with increased mortality, no-reflow, and lower LVEF, contributing to the field of biomarker-based risk stratification. We wish to highlight several limitations that merit further discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, the study overlooks the methodological limitation of dichotomizing continuous biomarkers. The NPS components (e.g., albumin, NLR) are continuous and may have non-linear relationships with outcomes. Forcing them into binary categories loses gradient risk information and masks component interactions. For instance, different combinations of albumin and NLR levels may yield the same NPS but carry distinct risks. This oversimplification likely contributes to the high heterogeneity observed, particularly for LVEF. Birdal et al. showed that while the high-NPS group had lower LVEF (45.2 ± 8.7% vs. 50.1 ± 8.2%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001), the impact of individual components varied significantly—a nuance obscured by dichotomization [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Thus, future studies should treat biomarkers as continuous variables and use advanced models (e.g., splines, machine learning) to capture non-linear relationships and enable personalized risk stratification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, the study neglects that the NPS's simple summation of nutrition (albumin, cholesterol) and inflammation (NLR, LMR) markers may blur distinct pathophysiologies (“nutritional depletion” vs. “inflammatory storm”). Keskin et al. identified two high-NPS subtypes in NSTEMI patients: a “low-albumin, low-inflammation” group with higher heart failure/infection rates, and a “normal-albumin, high-inflammation” group with higher reinfarction rates [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Targeted interventions yielded subtype-specific benefits (nutrition support reduced heart failure risk by 41% in the former; anti-inflammatory therapy reduced reinfarction by 53% in the latter). These critical differences are masked by the total NPS. Future work should use methods like cluster analysis to identify such phenotypes and test targeted therapies, transforming the NPS from a “black-box” score into a actionable phenotyping tool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Third, the study underemphasizes that current evidence is largely observational, limiting causal inference. It remains unclear whether a high NPS directly contributes to poor outcomes or merely reflects overall disease severity. Genc et al. found that after adjusting for disease severity markers, the independent association between NPS and prolonged hospitalization was attenuated (p-value increased from &lt; 0.01 to 0.08) [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;], suggesting NPS may be a severity marker rather than an independent driver. Therefore, the next step should be prospective validation and randomized trials testing whether NPS-guided interventions improve hard endpoints, elevating it from a predictor to an intervention target.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;F","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862230/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CTRP12: A Novel Biomarker in Predicting In-Stent Restenosis Occurrence CTRP12:预测支架内再狭窄发生的一种新的生物标志物。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-31 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70268
Ya Nie, Wanmei Song

We read with great interest the recent study entitled “Changes of Serum CTRP12 in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After the Treatment of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Its Relationship With In-Stent Restenosis”. The authors provide compelling evidence supporting C1q/tumor necrosis factor–related protein 12 (CTRP12) as a promising biomarker for both coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and the prediction of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after PCI [1]. We believe this work adds important translational value to the field of interventional cardiology. Several aspects underscore why CTRP12 may be regarded as a novel and clinically meaningful biomarker.

The demonstrated negative correlations between serum CTRP12 levels and the Gensini score as well as hs-CRP highlight its close association with coronary atherosclerotic severity and systemic inflammation. Unlike traditional biomarkers that primarily capture either ischemic burden or inflammation, CTRP12 appears to integrate both structural disease severity and inflammatory activity, two central drivers of ISR pathophysiology [2].

The observed acute decline in CTRP12 levels at 24 h after PCI, followed by partial recovery at 72 h, suggests that CTRP12 is sensitive to procedural vascular trauma and early inflammatory responses induced by stent implantation. This dynamic behavior distinguishes CTRP12 from static baseline biomarkers and supports its role as a real-time indicator of vascular healing or maladaptive repair processes that predispose to restenosis [3].

Notably, CTRP12 levels at 24 h post-PCI showed the highest predictive accuracy for ISR, and patients who developed ISR consistently exhibited lower CTRP12 levels at all measured time points. This temporal predictive capacity positions CTRP12 as a potentially actionable biomarker, enabling early risk stratification and closer surveillance or intensified therapy in high-risk patients.

In summary, CTRP12 emerges as a novel biomarker that links inflammation, coronary disease severity, and post-PCI vascular response. Future prospective studies and mechanistic investigations are warranted to validate its clinical utility and to explore whether modulation of CTRP12-related pathways could represent a therapeutic target for preventing ISR.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The data supporting this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了最近一篇题为“冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血清CTRP12的变化及其与支架内再狭窄的关系”的研究。作者提供了令人信服的证据,支持C1q/肿瘤坏死因子相关蛋白12 (CTRP12)作为冠状动脉疾病(CAD)严重程度和预测PCI[1]后支架内再狭窄(ISR)的有希望的生物标志物。我们相信这项工作为介入心脏病学领域增加了重要的转化价值。几个方面强调了为什么CTRP12可能被视为一种新的和有临床意义的生物标志物。血清CTRP12水平与Gensini评分和hs-CRP呈负相关,表明其与冠状动脉粥样硬化严重程度和全身炎症密切相关。与主要捕获缺血性负担或炎症的传统生物标志物不同,CTRP12似乎整合了结构性疾病严重程度和炎症活动,这是ISR病理生理bbb的两个主要驱动因素。在PCI术后24 h观察到CTRP12水平的急性下降,随后在72 h部分恢复,表明CTRP12对支架植入引起的程序性血管损伤和早期炎症反应敏感。这种动态行为将CTRP12与静态基线生物标志物区分开来,并支持其作为血管愈合或易发生再狭窄的不适应修复过程的实时指标的作用。值得注意的是,pci后24小时的CTRP12水平对ISR的预测准确性最高,发生ISR的患者在所有测量时间点的CTRP12水平均较低。这种时间预测能力使CTRP12成为一种潜在的可操作的生物标志物,可以对高危患者进行早期风险分层和更密切的监测或强化治疗。综上所述,CTRP12是一种新的生物标志物,可将炎症、冠状动脉疾病严重程度和pci后血管反应联系起来。未来的前瞻性研究和机制研究需要验证其临床应用,并探索ctrp12相关通路的调节是否可以作为预防ISR的治疗靶点。作者声明无利益冲突。在通讯作者提出合理要求后,可以获得支持本研究的数据。
{"title":"CTRP12: A Novel Biomarker in Predicting In-Stent Restenosis Occurrence","authors":"Ya Nie,&nbsp;Wanmei Song","doi":"10.1002/clc.70268","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70268","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest the recent study entitled <i>“Changes of Serum CTRP12 in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After the Treatment of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Its Relationship With In-Stent Restenosis”</i>. The authors provide compelling evidence supporting C1q/tumor necrosis factor–related protein 12 (CTRP12) as a promising biomarker for both coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and the prediction of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after PCI [<span>1</span>]. We believe this work adds important translational value to the field of interventional cardiology. Several aspects underscore why CTRP12 may be regarded as a novel and clinically meaningful biomarker.</p><p>The demonstrated negative correlations between serum CTRP12 levels and the Gensini score as well as hs-CRP highlight its close association with coronary atherosclerotic severity and systemic inflammation. Unlike traditional biomarkers that primarily capture either ischemic burden or inflammation, CTRP12 appears to integrate both structural disease severity and inflammatory activity, two central drivers of ISR pathophysiology [<span>2</span>].</p><p>The observed acute decline in CTRP12 levels at 24 h after PCI, followed by partial recovery at 72 h, suggests that CTRP12 is sensitive to procedural vascular trauma and early inflammatory responses induced by stent implantation. This dynamic behavior distinguishes CTRP12 from static baseline biomarkers and supports its role as a real-time indicator of vascular healing or maladaptive repair processes that predispose to restenosis [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Notably, CTRP12 levels at 24 h post-PCI showed the highest predictive accuracy for ISR, and patients who developed ISR consistently exhibited lower CTRP12 levels at all measured time points. This temporal predictive capacity positions CTRP12 as a potentially actionable biomarker, enabling early risk stratification and closer surveillance or intensified therapy in high-risk patients.</p><p>In summary, CTRP12 emerges as a novel biomarker that links inflammation, coronary disease severity, and post-PCI vascular response. Future prospective studies and mechanistic investigations are warranted to validate its clinical utility and to explore whether modulation of CTRP12-related pathways could represent a therapeutic target for preventing ISR.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>The data supporting this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.</p>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12859750/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critique on “Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction” 评《急性st段抬高型心肌梗死发生后循证医学结合处方的性别差异评价》
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70239
Maiza Naseer, Sameer Haider, Touqeer Rehman
<p>Evelo et al. published an article entitled “Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction” which we read with interest [<span>1</span>]. The authors examined an important clinical question: Are women less likely than men to be discharged with the full combination of evidence-based medicine (cEBM) after STEMI? In a retrospective cohort of 1467 patients in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands, they demonstrated that women were significantly less likely to be prescribed cEBM, particularly ACEi/ARB and statins. However, sex was not an independent predictor following multivariable adjustment [<span>1</span>]. This work is particularly important, especially in the context of studying a sizable real-world cohort and establishing prescribing patterns in contemporary STEMI care. Sensitivity analyses for left ventricular ejection fraction and subgroup comparisons add further robustness to the work. More importantly, their study illustrates that even with guideline-directed therapy, women continue to experience elevated rates of stroke and mortality when compared to men, reinforcing existing sex differences in cardiovascular care. There are some other limitations, not explicitly recognized by the authors, that should be considered when applying their findings in practice.</p><p>First, the single-center design limits the generalizability of the findings. All patients were treated at a Dutch Teaching Hospital that offers a range of cardiology services, where the guideline treatment is often well followed. Prescribing patterns and patient characteristics will likely vary considerably in a community or rural hospital setting. As a result, the findings may not be generalizable to larger or more diverse populations [<span>2</span>]. Multicenter registries could help clarify if the finding that sex was not an independent predictor holds true across health care systems.</p><p>Second, medication prescriptions were measured only at the time of discharge, and there was no record of dose, intensity, or longitudinal adjustments. In the study, cEBM was defined operationally as a “recommendation” for prescription of all five drug classes on the day after the index discharge [<span>1</span>]. This binary definition totally ignores underdosing (e.g., low-intensity statins, subtarget ACEi/ARB), titration, or discontinuation at a later date. Previous studies have demonstrated that underdosing and discontinuation, which are more frequently observed among women, are related to worse outcomes [<span>3, 4</span>]. By ignoring these variables, there is a risk that sex differences in secondary prevention will be underestimated.</p><p>Third, this study did not assess physician and system factors. The analysis was limited to patient-level factors. However, cardiovascular care disparities are often a reflection of provider practice patterns, implicit bias, a
Evelo等人发表了一篇文章《急性st段抬高型心肌梗死发生后循证医学结合处方的性别差异评价》,我们饶有兴趣地阅读了[1]。作者研究了一个重要的临床问题:在STEMI后,女性是否比男性更不可能完全结合循证医学(cEBM)出院?在荷兰一家教学医院的1467名患者的回顾性队列研究中,他们证明了女性服用cEBM的可能性明显较低,尤其是ACEi/ARB和他汀类药物。然而,在多变量调整后,性别并不是一个独立的预测因子。这项工作尤其重要,特别是在研究一个相当大的现实世界队列和建立当代STEMI护理的处方模式的背景下。左心室射血分数的敏感性分析和亚组比较进一步增加了工作的稳健性。更重要的是,他们的研究表明,即使采用指导指导的治疗方法,与男性相比,女性的中风率和死亡率仍然较高,这加强了心血管护理中存在的性别差异。还有一些作者没有明确认识到的其他限制,在将他们的发现应用于实践时应该加以考虑。首先,单中心设计限制了研究结果的普遍性。所有患者都在荷兰教学医院接受治疗,该医院提供一系列心脏病学服务,指导治疗通常得到很好的遵循。在社区或农村医院设置中,处方模式和患者特征可能会有很大差异。因此,这些发现可能无法推广到更大或更多样化的人群中。多中心登记可以帮助澄清性别不是独立预测因素的发现是否适用于整个医疗保健系统。其次,仅在出院时测量药物处方,并且没有剂量,强度或纵向调整的记录。在本研究中,cEBM被操作性地定义为在指标出院[1]后的第二天对所有五类药物的处方进行“推荐”。这种二元定义完全忽略了剂量不足(例如,低强度他汀类药物、亚靶ACEi/ARB)、滴定或以后停药。先前的研究表明,在女性中更常见的剂量不足和停药与较差的预后有关[3,4]。如果忽视这些变量,二级预防中的性别差异就有被低估的风险。第三,本研究没有评估医生和系统因素。分析仅限于患者层面的因素。然而,心血管护理差异往往反映了提供者的实践模式、隐性偏见和制度因素,如出院计划和门诊随访[5,6]。如果不考虑这些因素,我们很难知道我们所看到的治疗差距是由于患者之间的合并症率还是由于医疗服务的结构性不平等。最后,不良结果的描述未考虑混杂因素。在这项观察性研究中,女性的6个月死亡率和中风率增加,但这些比较没有根据年龄、基线合并症或治疗强度进行调整。正如先前的分析所证明的那样,在对各种因素进行全面调整后,与性别有关的死亡率差距趋于缩小。因此,报告未经调整的不良结果可能夸大了性别本身的影响,而对护理过程的风险因素和变量可能更有影响。为了推进这一重要的研究议程,有必要提出以下建议:(a)扩展到多中心队列以促进推广,(b)考虑剂量和纵向依从性,(c)探索处方提供者和系统的特征,以及(d)承认不良后果的混杂因素。这些设计将更好地解决观察到的差异是生物学驱动的、患者相关的还是结构介质。综上所述,Evelo等人提供的证据表明,女性在STEMI后较少使用cEBM,而年龄、合并症和抗凝血剂的使用是最大的差异。鉴于与不良事件相关的风险增加,在多中心环境中,随着系统意识的提高,有必要开始确定系统,以解决stemi后二级预防中的不公平现象。作者没有得到这项工作的特别资助。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。作者没有什么可报告的。
{"title":"Critique on “Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction”","authors":"Maiza Naseer,&nbsp;Sameer Haider,&nbsp;Touqeer Rehman","doi":"10.1002/clc.70239","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70239","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Evelo et al. published an article entitled “Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction” which we read with interest [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. The authors examined an important clinical question: Are women less likely than men to be discharged with the full combination of evidence-based medicine (cEBM) after STEMI? In a retrospective cohort of 1467 patients in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands, they demonstrated that women were significantly less likely to be prescribed cEBM, particularly ACEi/ARB and statins. However, sex was not an independent predictor following multivariable adjustment [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. This work is particularly important, especially in the context of studying a sizable real-world cohort and establishing prescribing patterns in contemporary STEMI care. Sensitivity analyses for left ventricular ejection fraction and subgroup comparisons add further robustness to the work. More importantly, their study illustrates that even with guideline-directed therapy, women continue to experience elevated rates of stroke and mortality when compared to men, reinforcing existing sex differences in cardiovascular care. There are some other limitations, not explicitly recognized by the authors, that should be considered when applying their findings in practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, the single-center design limits the generalizability of the findings. All patients were treated at a Dutch Teaching Hospital that offers a range of cardiology services, where the guideline treatment is often well followed. Prescribing patterns and patient characteristics will likely vary considerably in a community or rural hospital setting. As a result, the findings may not be generalizable to larger or more diverse populations [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Multicenter registries could help clarify if the finding that sex was not an independent predictor holds true across health care systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, medication prescriptions were measured only at the time of discharge, and there was no record of dose, intensity, or longitudinal adjustments. In the study, cEBM was defined operationally as a “recommendation” for prescription of all five drug classes on the day after the index discharge [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. This binary definition totally ignores underdosing (e.g., low-intensity statins, subtarget ACEi/ARB), titration, or discontinuation at a later date. Previous studies have demonstrated that underdosing and discontinuation, which are more frequently observed among women, are related to worse outcomes [&lt;span&gt;3, 4&lt;/span&gt;]. By ignoring these variables, there is a risk that sex differences in secondary prevention will be underestimated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Third, this study did not assess physician and system factors. The analysis was limited to patient-level factors. However, cardiovascular care disparities are often a reflection of provider practice patterns, implicit bias, a","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12834462/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Ventricular Tachycardia Electrical Storm 导管消融治疗室性心动过速电风暴的远期疗效评价。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70265
Sohana Memon, Gaaitri Lohano
<p>The research by Çöteli et al. [<span>1</span>], titled <i>“Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Ventricular Tachycardia Electrical Storm: A Retrospective Cohort Study,”</i> caught our interest. The authors deserve praise for their methodical evaluation of a high-risk patient population presenting with electrical storm and for providing a comprehensive description of their retrospective cohort study design, patient selection criteria, and procedural methods. Their detailed documentation of VT induction strategies, ICD therapy monitoring, catheter ablation techniques, and follow-up procedures offers valuable insight into real-world management. These methodological strengths reinforce the reliability of the reported findings regarding procedural success, VT recurrence, ICD interventions, and survival outcomes. Nevertheless, certain limitations related to risk stratification and outcome assessment may influence the interpretation and generalizability of the results.</p><p>First, in high-risk cardiac populations, procedural tolerance, mortality, and post-ablation outcomes are influenced not only by left ventricular ejection fraction and comorbidities but also by overall physiological reserve. Patients with similar LVEF profiles may differ substantially in frailty status, which has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The absence of frailty assessment in the current study limits granular risk stratification and may complicate interpretation of long-term mortality and morbidity outcomes. Although frailty evaluation can be challenging in retrospective cohorts, incorporating validated frailty measures in future studies could enhance prognostic accuracy and clinical applicability [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Second, an important methodological consideration is the lack of a standardized ventricular tachycardia induction protocol during catheter ablation. While programmed ventricular stimulation and burst pacing were employed, details regarding pacing sites, number of extrastimuli, and stimulation parameters were not uniformly defined. Such variability may influence VT detection and the prognostic interpretation of post-ablation non-inducibility, even if it does not undermine procedural efficacy itself. Prior high-risk VT ablation studies have demonstrated that variability in stimulation methodology can affect the predictive value of inducibility for long-term clinical outcomes [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Finally, the influence of operator experience on procedural outcomes was not addressed. Given the prolonged study period and the complexity of VT ablation procedures, including combined endocardial and epicardial approaches, operator-related variability may have affected outcomes. Recent evidence demonstrates that higher procedural volume is associated with improved safety and efficacy in VT ablation: Bansal et al. (2025) showed that high-volume centers had significantly lower in-hospital mortality and major complications
Çöteli等人的研究,题为“室性心动过速电风暴中导管消融的长期结果:一项回顾性队列研究”引起了我们的兴趣。作者对出现电风暴的高危患者群体进行了系统的评估,并对他们的回顾性队列研究设计、患者选择标准和程序方法进行了全面的描述,值得称赞。他们详细记录了VT诱导策略、ICD治疗监测、导管消融技术和随访程序,为现实世界的管理提供了宝贵的见解。这些方法学上的优势加强了关于手术成功、室速复发、ICD干预和生存结果的报告结果的可靠性。然而,与风险分层和结果评估相关的某些局限性可能会影响结果的解释和推广。首先,在高危心脏人群中,手术耐受性、死亡率和消融后结果不仅受左室射血分数和合并症的影响,还受总体生理储备的影响。具有相似LVEF特征的患者在虚弱状态上可能存在很大差异,这已被证明是心血管死亡率的独立预测因子。目前研究中缺乏脆弱性评估,限制了细粒度的风险分层,并可能使长期死亡率和发病率结果的解释复杂化。尽管衰弱评估在回顾性队列中可能具有挑战性,但在未来的研究中纳入经过验证的衰弱测量可以提高预后准确性和临床适用性[10]。其次,一个重要的方法学考虑是在导管消融过程中缺乏标准化的室性心动过速诱导方案。虽然采用了程序性心室刺激和猝发起搏,但起搏部位、外刺激次数和刺激参数的细节并没有统一定义。这种变异性可能影响VT检测和消融后不可诱发性的预后解释,即使它本身不影响手术疗效。先前的高风险房室消融研究表明,刺激方法的可变性会影响诱导性对长期临床结果的预测价值。最后,操作人员经验对程序结果的影响没有得到解决。考虑到研究时间的延长和室速消融手术的复杂性,包括心内膜和心外膜联合入路,操作者相关的变异性可能会影响结果。最近的证据表明,更大的手术容量与更高的室速消融安全性和有效性相关:Bansal等人(2025)表明,与小容量中心相比,大容量中心的住院死亡率和主要并发症显著降低,这突出了操作人员和机构经验对手术结果的重要性[10]。再次,我们真诚地感谢作者对文献的宝贵贡献,以及他们在解决重要和具有挑战性的临床状况方面的努力。然而,作为研究人员,我们认为总是有改进的空间,任何必要的调整都应该做出,因为这将提高我们对整个研究的理解。作者没有得到这项工作的特别资助。伦理审批不适用于此类文章。作者声明无利益冲突。作者没有什么可报告的。
{"title":"Comment on Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Ventricular Tachycardia Electrical Storm","authors":"Sohana Memon,&nbsp;Gaaitri Lohano","doi":"10.1002/clc.70265","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70265","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The research by Çöteli et al. [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;], titled &lt;i&gt;“Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Ventricular Tachycardia Electrical Storm: A Retrospective Cohort Study,”&lt;/i&gt; caught our interest. The authors deserve praise for their methodical evaluation of a high-risk patient population presenting with electrical storm and for providing a comprehensive description of their retrospective cohort study design, patient selection criteria, and procedural methods. Their detailed documentation of VT induction strategies, ICD therapy monitoring, catheter ablation techniques, and follow-up procedures offers valuable insight into real-world management. These methodological strengths reinforce the reliability of the reported findings regarding procedural success, VT recurrence, ICD interventions, and survival outcomes. Nevertheless, certain limitations related to risk stratification and outcome assessment may influence the interpretation and generalizability of the results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, in high-risk cardiac populations, procedural tolerance, mortality, and post-ablation outcomes are influenced not only by left ventricular ejection fraction and comorbidities but also by overall physiological reserve. Patients with similar LVEF profiles may differ substantially in frailty status, which has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The absence of frailty assessment in the current study limits granular risk stratification and may complicate interpretation of long-term mortality and morbidity outcomes. Although frailty evaluation can be challenging in retrospective cohorts, incorporating validated frailty measures in future studies could enhance prognostic accuracy and clinical applicability [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, an important methodological consideration is the lack of a standardized ventricular tachycardia induction protocol during catheter ablation. While programmed ventricular stimulation and burst pacing were employed, details regarding pacing sites, number of extrastimuli, and stimulation parameters were not uniformly defined. Such variability may influence VT detection and the prognostic interpretation of post-ablation non-inducibility, even if it does not undermine procedural efficacy itself. Prior high-risk VT ablation studies have demonstrated that variability in stimulation methodology can affect the predictive value of inducibility for long-term clinical outcomes [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, the influence of operator experience on procedural outcomes was not addressed. Given the prolonged study period and the complexity of VT ablation procedures, including combined endocardial and epicardial approaches, operator-related variability may have affected outcomes. Recent evidence demonstrates that higher procedural volume is associated with improved safety and efficacy in VT ablation: Bansal et al. (2025) showed that high-volume centers had significantly lower in-hospital mortality and major complications ","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12831169/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Loop Diuretic Therapy in Severe Aortic Stenosis: Marker or Mediator of Adverse Outcomes? 重度主动脉瓣狭窄的循环利尿剂治疗:不良结局的标志还是中介?
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70264
Masaki Miyazawa, Teruhiko Imamura
<p>The association between loop diuretic therapy (LDT), congestion, heart failure severity, and post-procedural outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains incompletely understood. In this well-conducted observational study, the authors demonstrated that pre-procedural LDT was associated with more advanced cardiac remodeling, greater systemic and pulmonary congestion, unfavorable invasive hemodynamics, and increased long-term mortality after AVR [<span>1</span>]. Several points merit further discussion.</p><p>Although the authors clearly demonstrated robust associations between LDT, congestion markers, and adverse outcomes [<span>1</span>], the causal relationship remains uncertain. It is unclear whether LDT merely reflects advanced disease severity or actively contributes to worse clinical outcomes. In other words, LDT may function as a marker rather than a mediator of poor prognosis. To better disentangle this relationship, it would be informative to compare outcomes among patients with comparable doses of loop diuretics but different congestion severity. For example, matching patients with similar doses of loop diuretics but differing pulmonary artery wedge pressure or radiographic congestion scores might help clarify whether congestion itself, rather than LDT, primarily drives prognosis.</p><p>A substantial proportion of patients receiving LDT still exhibited elevated filling pressures [<span>1</span>], suggesting suboptimal congestion control. If congestion is the principal determinant of poor outcomes [<span>2</span>], more aggressive or optimized decongestive strategies—rather than avoidance of LDT—might theoretically improve hemodynamics and prognosis. This perspective is particularly relevant given the paradoxical positive association between loop diuretic dose and filling pressures observed in the study [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Another hypothesis is that LDT is a major driver of worse clinical outcomes. Background-matched comparisons between patients receiving LDT and those not receiving LDT would further strengthen causal inference. Because LDT prescription was left entirely to the discretion of treating clinicians [<span>1</span>], confounding by indication is unavoidable (i.e., patients with more severe congestion tend to receive LDT). Although the authors appropriately acknowledge this limitation, advanced statistical approaches such as propensity score matching or inverse probability weighting could provide additional insights into whether LDT independently contributes to mortality risk beyond reflecting advanced cardiac damage.</p><p>If LDT is rather the major driver of worse clinical outcomes, the potential role of alternative or adjunctive therapies deserves consideration. If LDT is associated with renal dysfunction or neuro-hormonal activation, partial substitution with other agents—such as vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists or sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors
对于重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的患者,循环利尿剂治疗(LDT)、充血、心力衰竭严重程度和术后预后之间的关系尚不完全清楚。在这项进行良好的观察性研究中,作者证明手术前LDT与更晚期的心脏重构、更严重的全身和肺部充血、不利的侵入性血流动力学以及AVR[1]后长期死亡率增加有关。有几点值得进一步讨论。尽管作者清楚地证明了LDT、充血标记物和不良后果之间的密切联系,但因果关系仍不确定。目前尚不清楚LDT是否仅仅反映了疾病的严重程度,还是直接导致了更差的临床结果。换句话说,LDT可能作为不良预后的标志而不是中介。为了更好地理清这种关系,比较使用相同剂量利尿剂但不同充血严重程度的患者的结果将是有益的。例如,匹配使用相似剂量利尿剂但肺动脉楔压或x线片充血评分不同的患者,可能有助于澄清是充血本身,而不是LDT,主要驱动预后。相当一部分接受LDT治疗的患者仍然表现出较高的充血压力[1],这表明充血控制不理想。如果充血是不良预后的主要决定因素,更积极或优化的去充血策略-而不是避免ldt -理论上可能改善血流动力学和预后。考虑到研究中观察到的利尿剂剂量和填充压力之间矛盾的正相关关系,这一观点尤其相关。另一种假设是,LDT是导致临床结果恶化的主要原因。在接受LDT和未接受LDT的患者之间进行背景匹配比较将进一步加强因果推理。由于LDT处方完全由治疗临床医生自行决定,因此不可避免地会出现适应症混淆(即充血更严重的患者倾向于接受LDT)。尽管作者适当地承认了这一局限性,但倾向评分匹配或逆概率加权等先进的统计方法可以提供额外的见解,以了解LDT是否独立地导致死亡风险,而不是反映晚期心脏损伤。如果LDT是不良临床结果的主要驱动因素,那么替代或辅助治疗的潜在作用值得考虑。如果LDT与肾功能障碍或神经激素激活有关,部分替代其他药物,如抗利尿激素V2受体拮抗剂或钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂,可能在保持肾功能和潜在改善预后的同时有效地减少充血。有必要进行前瞻性研究,以探讨这些策略是否可以改变在AVR之前需要利尿剂治疗的严重AS患者的风险概况。作者没有得到这项工作的特别资助。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。该手稿不包括任何原始数据。
{"title":"Loop Diuretic Therapy in Severe Aortic Stenosis: Marker or Mediator of Adverse Outcomes?","authors":"Masaki Miyazawa,&nbsp;Teruhiko Imamura","doi":"10.1002/clc.70264","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70264","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The association between loop diuretic therapy (LDT), congestion, heart failure severity, and post-procedural outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains incompletely understood. In this well-conducted observational study, the authors demonstrated that pre-procedural LDT was associated with more advanced cardiac remodeling, greater systemic and pulmonary congestion, unfavorable invasive hemodynamics, and increased long-term mortality after AVR [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Several points merit further discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although the authors clearly demonstrated robust associations between LDT, congestion markers, and adverse outcomes [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;], the causal relationship remains uncertain. It is unclear whether LDT merely reflects advanced disease severity or actively contributes to worse clinical outcomes. In other words, LDT may function as a marker rather than a mediator of poor prognosis. To better disentangle this relationship, it would be informative to compare outcomes among patients with comparable doses of loop diuretics but different congestion severity. For example, matching patients with similar doses of loop diuretics but differing pulmonary artery wedge pressure or radiographic congestion scores might help clarify whether congestion itself, rather than LDT, primarily drives prognosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A substantial proportion of patients receiving LDT still exhibited elevated filling pressures [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;], suggesting suboptimal congestion control. If congestion is the principal determinant of poor outcomes [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;], more aggressive or optimized decongestive strategies—rather than avoidance of LDT—might theoretically improve hemodynamics and prognosis. This perspective is particularly relevant given the paradoxical positive association between loop diuretic dose and filling pressures observed in the study [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another hypothesis is that LDT is a major driver of worse clinical outcomes. Background-matched comparisons between patients receiving LDT and those not receiving LDT would further strengthen causal inference. Because LDT prescription was left entirely to the discretion of treating clinicians [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;], confounding by indication is unavoidable (i.e., patients with more severe congestion tend to receive LDT). Although the authors appropriately acknowledge this limitation, advanced statistical approaches such as propensity score matching or inverse probability weighting could provide additional insights into whether LDT independently contributes to mortality risk beyond reflecting advanced cardiac damage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If LDT is rather the major driver of worse clinical outcomes, the potential role of alternative or adjunctive therapies deserves consideration. If LDT is associated with renal dysfunction or neuro-hormonal activation, partial substitution with other agents—such as vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists or sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828346/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146028525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of Age on Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 年龄对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后健康相关生活质量改善的影响
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70260
Laura Lappalainen, Piia Lavikainen, Risto P. Roine, Harri Sintonen, Janne Martikainen, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Juha Hartikainen

Introduction

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the first-line therapy in patients scheduled for coronary revascularization, aiming to relieve symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD) and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and prognosis. Particularly, in older adults, symptom alleviation and HRQoL are emphasized. However, it is not known whether older patients benefit from PCI equally to their younger peers. We used disease-specific and generic instruments to evaluate the improvement in HRQoL after PCI, comparing changes in three age groups.

Methods

Altogether 300 patients undergoing PCI were divided into three age groups: ≥ 75 years (n = 89), 66–74 years (n = 117), and ≤ 65 years (n = 94). HRQoL was measured using the disease-specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) and the generic 15D instrument at baseline, one, and 12 months.

Results

Statistically and clinically significant improvements in the SAQ-7 and 15D scores were observed after one- and 12-month follow-up in all age groups. There were no differences in the 12-month improvements in the SAQ-7 and 15D scores between the groups. The 15D score started to decline after 1 month, particularly in the oldest group. The decline was associated with age-related rather than CAD-related 15D dimensions.

Conclusions

Our findings on comparable improvement in disease-specific and generic HRQoL after PCI in older and younger patients are encouraging, particularly considering that the aims of PCI in older adults are predominantly symptom alleviation and improvement of daily activities. In addition, to overcome age-related changes in HRQoL, a disease-specific instrument should be incorporated in the evaluation of PCI on HRQoL.

Clinical trial registration

5101114.

简介:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是冠脉重建术患者的一线治疗,旨在缓解冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的症状,改善健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和预后。特别是在老年人中,强调症状缓解和HRQoL。然而,尚不清楚老年患者是否与年轻患者同样受益于PCI。我们使用疾病特异性和通用仪器来评估PCI术后HRQoL的改善,比较三个年龄组的变化。方法:300例行PCI的患者分为≥75岁(n = 89)、66 ~ 74岁(n = 117)和≤65岁(n = 94) 3组。HRQoL分别在基线、1个月和12个月采用疾病特异性西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ-7)和通用15D仪进行测量。结果:各年龄组在随访1个月和12个月后SAQ-7和15D评分均有统计学和临床意义的改善。在SAQ-7和15D评分的12个月改善方面,两组之间没有差异。1个月后,15D分数开始下降,尤其是在年龄最大的一组中。这种下降与年龄有关,而与cad相关的15D尺寸无关。结论:我们的研究结果显示,老年和年轻患者PCI后疾病特异性和一般HRQoL的可比改善是令人鼓舞的,特别是考虑到老年人PCI的目的主要是缓解症状和改善日常活动。此外,为了克服HRQoL与年龄相关的变化,应将疾病特异性仪器纳入PCI对HRQoL的评估。临床试验注册:5101114。
{"title":"The Effect of Age on Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"Laura Lappalainen,&nbsp;Piia Lavikainen,&nbsp;Risto P. Roine,&nbsp;Harri Sintonen,&nbsp;Janne Martikainen,&nbsp;Anna-Maija Tolppanen,&nbsp;Juha Hartikainen","doi":"10.1002/clc.70260","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70260","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the first-line therapy in patients scheduled for coronary revascularization, aiming to relieve symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD) and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and prognosis. Particularly, in older adults, symptom alleviation and HRQoL are emphasized. However, it is not known whether older patients benefit from PCI equally to their younger peers. We used disease-specific and generic instruments to evaluate the improvement in HRQoL after PCI, comparing changes in three age groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Altogether 300 patients undergoing PCI were divided into three age groups: ≥ 75 years (<i>n</i> = 89), 66–74 years (<i>n</i> = 117), and ≤ 65 years (<i>n</i> = 94). HRQoL was measured using the disease-specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) and the generic 15D instrument at baseline, one, and 12 months.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Statistically and clinically significant improvements in the SAQ-7 and 15D scores were observed after one- and 12-month follow-up in all age groups. There were no differences in the 12-month improvements in the SAQ-7 and 15D scores between the groups. The 15D score started to decline after 1 month, particularly in the oldest group. The decline was associated with age-related rather than CAD-related 15D dimensions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our findings on comparable improvement in disease-specific and generic HRQoL after PCI in older and younger patients are encouraging, particularly considering that the aims of PCI in older adults are predominantly symptom alleviation and improvement of daily activities. In addition, to overcome age-related changes in HRQoL, a disease-specific instrument should be incorporated in the evaluation of PCI on HRQoL.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Clinical trial registration</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>5101114.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12817284/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
States With Highest and Lowest Cardiovascular Disease-Related Mortality in the United States (1999−2019): Top and Bottom 3 美国心血管疾病相关死亡率最高和最低的州(1999-2019年):前3和后3。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70256
Muhammad Umer Sohail, Ruqiat Masooma Batool, Muhammad Saad, Saad Ahmed Waqas, Asad Ali Ahmed Cheema, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas

Background

Despite declines since the 1960s, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality in the United States. However, recent data indicate stabilization or increases in certain regions, highlighting persistent disparities. This study analyzes trends in states with the highest and lowest CVD-related age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) from 1999 to 2019.

Methods

Using CDC WONDER, we conducted a retrospective analysis of CVD-related mortality in adults aged ≥ 25 years. AAMRs were calculated using ICD-10 codes I00-I99, and trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression for annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC).

Results

Between 1999 and 2019, national AAMR declined from 798.47 to 595.56 per 100 000 (AAPC: −1.5%, 95% CI: −1.8% to −1.2%). Mississippi had the highest AAMR (902.23) with the slowest decline, whereas Arizona had the lowest (530.40) with a steeper reduction. Males (702.15), non-Hispanic Black individuals (850.32), and nonmetropolitan populations (645.21) had persistently higher mortality. Urban-rural disparities widened over time.

Conclusion

State-level variations in CVD mortality reflect persistent socioeconomic, behavioral, and healthcare disparities. These findings highlight widening regional gaps and emphasize the need for stronger, state-specific public health strategies, improved access to preventive care, and targeted interventions for disproportionately affected groups. Strengthening surveillance systems, expanding evidence-based cardiovascular prevention programs, and addressing structural determinants of health will be essential to reduce the observed disparities and sustain long-term progress in CVD mortality reduction across the United States.

背景:尽管自20世纪60年代以来有所下降,但心血管疾病(cvd)仍然是美国死亡的主要原因。然而,最近的数据表明,某些区域的情况趋于稳定或有所增加,突出了持续存在的差距。本研究分析了1999年至2019年心血管疾病相关年龄调整死亡率(AAMRs)最高和最低州的趋势。方法:使用CDC WONDER对年龄≥25岁的成人心血管疾病相关死亡率进行回顾性分析。采用ICD-10代码I00-I99计算aamr,采用年变化百分比(APC)和平均年变化百分比(AAPC)的Joinpoint回归评估趋势。结果:1999年至2019年,全国AAMR从每10万人798.47下降到595.56 (AAPC: -1.5%, 95% CI: -1.8%至-1.2%)。密西西比州的AAMR最高(902.23),下降最慢,而亚利桑那州最低(530.40),下降幅度更大。男性(702.15)、非西班牙裔黑人(850.32)和非大都市人群(645.21)的死亡率持续较高。城乡差距随着时间的推移而扩大。结论:各州心血管疾病死亡率的差异反映了持续存在的社会经济、行为和医疗保健差异。这些调查结果突出了区域差距的扩大,并强调需要制定更强有力的、针对具体国家的公共卫生战略,改善获得预防保健的机会,并针对受严重影响的群体采取有针对性的干预措施。加强监测系统,扩大以证据为基础的心血管预防项目,解决健康的结构性决定因素,对于减少观察到的差距和维持美国心血管疾病死亡率降低的长期进展至关重要。
{"title":"States With Highest and Lowest Cardiovascular Disease-Related Mortality in the United States (1999−2019): Top and Bottom 3","authors":"Muhammad Umer Sohail,&nbsp;Ruqiat Masooma Batool,&nbsp;Muhammad Saad,&nbsp;Saad Ahmed Waqas,&nbsp;Asad Ali Ahmed Cheema,&nbsp;Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas","doi":"10.1002/clc.70256","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70256","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite declines since the 1960s, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality in the United States. However, recent data indicate stabilization or increases in certain regions, highlighting persistent disparities. This study analyzes trends in states with the highest and lowest CVD-related age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) from 1999 to 2019.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using CDC WONDER, we conducted a retrospective analysis of CVD-related mortality in adults aged ≥ 25 years. AAMRs were calculated using ICD-10 codes I00-I99, and trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression for annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Between 1999 and 2019, national AAMR declined from 798.47 to 595.56 per 100 000 (AAPC: −1.5%, 95% CI: −1.8% to −1.2%). Mississippi had the highest AAMR (902.23) with the slowest decline, whereas Arizona had the lowest (530.40) with a steeper reduction. Males (702.15), non-Hispanic Black individuals (850.32), and nonmetropolitan populations (645.21) had persistently higher mortality. Urban-rural disparities widened over time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>State-level variations in CVD mortality reflect persistent socioeconomic, behavioral, and healthcare disparities. These findings highlight widening regional gaps and emphasize the need for stronger, state-specific public health strategies, improved access to preventive care, and targeted interventions for disproportionately affected groups. Strengthening surveillance systems, expanding evidence-based cardiovascular prevention programs, and addressing structural determinants of health will be essential to reduce the observed disparities and sustain long-term progress in CVD mortality reduction across the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809465/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Apical Sparing of Longitudinal Strain and Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertensive Patients and Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats: Based on Speckle Tracking and Histological Analysis 高血压患者和自发性高血压大鼠纵向应变和心肌纤维化的根尖保留:基于斑点追踪和组织学分析。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70255
Chunyan Huang, Yongxin Wu, Meiyan Lin, Yupeng Chen, Shengnan Lin, Liyun Fu, Huimei Huang

Background

This study aimed to investigate regional myocardial strain and fibrosis distribution to analyze the apical sparing pattern and the relation with hypertrophy in hypertension.

Methods

This study included clinical and experimental animal investigations. Seventy-three hypertensive patients were divided into two groups: hypertension without left ventricular hypertrophy (HT-NLVH) and hypertension with LVH (HT-LVH). Six 16-week-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and six age-matched male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were included in this experiment. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained. Myocardial strain indexes, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), the basal, middle, and apical segmental LS (LS-bas, LS-mid, LS-ap), and the proportion of LS-ap/(LS-bas + LS-mid + LS-ap) (P-ap) were measured. The histological collagen volume fraction (CVF) and perivascular collagen area (PVCA) of basal and apical segments (CVF-bas, CVF-ap, PVCA-bas, PVCA-ap) were observed in all rats.

Results

Despite preserved systolic function (FS, LVEF), the HT-NLVH and HT-LVH groups exhibited diastolic impairment (elevated LAVI, E/e’) (all p < 0.05). LS-ap declined only in HT-LVH, while LS-mid and LS-bas worsened from HT-NLVH to HT-LVH, and the HT-LVH group exhibited a significantly elevated P-ap (all p < 0.05). P-ap was associated with LV remodeling indexes and E/e’ (all p < 0.05). Compared with WKY, LS-bas decreased in SHR (p < 0.05). The SHR group demonstrated significantly elevated PVCA-bas, PVCA-ap, and CVF-bas (p < 0.05), while the CVF-ap had no significant difference.

Conclusion

Myocardial dysfunction and fibrosis exhibited regional heterogeneity with predominant basal damage and apical sparing in hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy. This apical-sparing pattern correlated significantly with both diastolic dysfunction and hypertrophic progression, suggesting its potential as a clinically observable hallmark.

背景:本研究旨在通过研究高血压患者心肌局部应变和纤维化分布,分析心肌根尖保留模式及其与肥厚的关系。方法:采用临床和实验动物研究相结合的方法。73例高血压患者分为非左室肥厚型高血压(ht - nvh)和合并左室肥厚型高血压(HT-LVH)两组。实验选用16周龄雄性自发性高血压大鼠(SHR) 6只和同龄雄性Wistar-Kyoto大鼠(WKY) 6只。超声心动图测量。测量心肌应变指标,包括总纵应变(GLS),基底、中、尖段LS (LS-bas、LS-mid、LS-ap),以及LS-ap/(LS-bas + LS-mid + LS-ap) (P-ap)的比例。观察各组大鼠基底节和根尖节(CVF-bas、CVF-ap、PVCA-bas、PVCA-ap)的组织学胶原体积分数(CVF)和血管周围胶原面积(PVCA)。结果:尽管收缩期功能(FS、LVEF)得以保留,但ht - nvlvh组和HT-LVH组均表现出舒张功能损害(LAVI、E/ E′升高)(均p)。结论:高血压性心脏肥厚患者心肌功能障碍和纤维化表现出区域异质性,以基底损害和根尖保留为主。这种根尖保留模式与舒张功能障碍和肥厚进展显著相关,表明其可能是临床可观察到的标志。
{"title":"Apical Sparing of Longitudinal Strain and Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertensive Patients and Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats: Based on Speckle Tracking and Histological Analysis","authors":"Chunyan Huang,&nbsp;Yongxin Wu,&nbsp;Meiyan Lin,&nbsp;Yupeng Chen,&nbsp;Shengnan Lin,&nbsp;Liyun Fu,&nbsp;Huimei Huang","doi":"10.1002/clc.70255","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70255","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to investigate regional myocardial strain and fibrosis distribution to analyze the apical sparing pattern and the relation with hypertrophy in hypertension.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study included clinical and experimental animal investigations. Seventy-three hypertensive patients were divided into two groups: hypertension without left ventricular hypertrophy (HT-NLVH) and hypertension with LVH (HT-LVH). Six 16-week-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and six age-matched male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were included in this experiment. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained. Myocardial strain indexes, including global longitudinal strain (GLS), the basal, middle, and apical segmental LS (LS-bas, LS-mid, LS-ap), and the proportion of LS-ap/(LS-bas + LS-mid + LS-ap) (P-ap) were measured. The histological collagen volume fraction (CVF) and perivascular collagen area (PVCA) of basal and apical segments (CVF-bas, CVF-ap, PVCA-bas, PVCA-ap) were observed in all rats.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite preserved systolic function (FS, LVEF), the HT-NLVH and HT-LVH groups exhibited diastolic impairment (elevated LAVI, E/e’) (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). LS-ap declined only in HT-LVH, while LS-mid and LS-bas worsened from HT-NLVH to HT-LVH, and the HT-LVH group exhibited a significantly elevated P-ap (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). P-ap was associated with LV remodeling indexes and E/e’ (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Compared with WKY, LS-bas decreased in SHR (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The SHR group demonstrated significantly elevated PVCA-bas, PVCA-ap, and CVF-bas (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), while the CVF-ap had no significant difference.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Myocardial dysfunction and fibrosis exhibited regional heterogeneity with predominant basal damage and apical sparing in hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy. This apical-sparing pattern correlated significantly with both diastolic dysfunction and hypertrophic progression, suggesting its potential as a clinically observable hallmark.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805527/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Cardiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1