首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Cardiology最新文献

英文 中文
Prognostic Value of Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 血小板/淋巴细胞比值对心肌梗死的预后价值:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70215
Hengxu Yu, Shitao Li, Yutong Wu, Xiangpeng Ren

Background

Correlations between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are reported in more studies, though there is no evidence-based data.

Methods

Databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to April 19, 2024, to retrieve articles discussing associations between PLR and clinical outcomes in AMI patients. The primary outcomes, comprising mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), were assessed with odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were utilized to probe the results' robustness and potential heterogeneity sources. Analysis was carried out utilizing the software of Review Manager 5.4 & STATA 15.0.

Results

This article selected 18 cohort studies, covering 16,545 AMI patients. The meta-analysis found that elevated PLR was significantly linked with mortality in AMI patients (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04–1.08, p < 0.00001). Additionally, PLR was highly linked with MACE risks in AMI patients (OR = 1.495; 95% CI: 1.24–1.80, p < 0.0001). Further subgroup analyses discovered a significant correlation between PLR and mortality in prospective studies (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05–1.09), studies with a sample size ≥ 500 (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04–1.08), patients under 70 years of age (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05–1.09), studies from European regions (OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.06–1.10), patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.07–1.11), and those with a PLR cutoff value < 140 (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05–1.09) (p < 0.05). For MACE, similar subgroup analyses also proved an obvious correlation between PLR and MACE in the aforementioned subgroups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

PLR values are linked with mortality and MACE in AMI patients. PLR serves as an effective prognostic biomarker for AMI patients, providing precious opinions for sensible therapeutic decisions in AMI treatments.

背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)与预后之间的相关性被更多的研究报道,尽管没有基于证据的数据。方法:检索数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library),检索从数据库建立到2024年4月19日讨论AMI患者PLR与临床结局之间关系的文章。主要结局包括死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(MACE),采用优势比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)进行评估。采用敏感性分析和亚组分析来探讨结果的稳健性和潜在异质性来源。利用Review Manager 5.4和STATA 15.0软件进行分析。结果:本文选择了18项队列研究,涵盖了16545例AMI患者。荟萃分析发现,AMI患者PLR升高与死亡率显著相关(OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.08, p)。结论:AMI患者PLR值与死亡率和MACE相关。PLR作为AMI患者有效的预后生物标志物,为AMI治疗的合理治疗决策提供宝贵意见。
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio for Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Hengxu Yu,&nbsp;Shitao Li,&nbsp;Yutong Wu,&nbsp;Xiangpeng Ren","doi":"10.1002/clc.70215","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70215","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Correlations between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are reported in more studies, though there is no evidence-based data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to April 19, 2024, to retrieve articles discussing associations between PLR and clinical outcomes in AMI patients. The primary outcomes, comprising mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), were assessed with odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were utilized to probe the results' robustness and potential heterogeneity sources. Analysis was carried out utilizing the software of Review Manager 5.4 &amp; STATA 15.0.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article selected 18 cohort studies, covering 16,545 AMI patients. The meta-analysis found that elevated PLR was significantly linked with mortality in AMI patients (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04–1.08, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001). Additionally, PLR was highly linked with MACE risks in AMI patients (OR = 1.495; 95% CI: 1.24–1.80, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Further subgroup analyses discovered a significant correlation between PLR and mortality in prospective studies (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05–1.09), studies with a sample size ≥ 500 (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04–1.08), patients under 70 years of age (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05–1.09), studies from European regions (OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.06–1.10), patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.07–1.11), and those with a PLR cutoff value &lt; 140 (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.05–1.09) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). For MACE, similar subgroup analyses also proved an obvious correlation between PLR and MACE in the aforementioned subgroups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>PLR values are linked with mortality and MACE in AMI patients. PLR serves as an effective prognostic biomarker for AMI patients, providing precious opinions for sensible therapeutic decisions in AMI treatments.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520137/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145291384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computed Tomography-Verified Pacing Location of Micra Leadless Pacemakers and Characteristics of Paced Electrocardiograms in Bradycardia Patients 计算机断层扫描验证Micra无铅起搏器起搏位置和心动过缓患者起搏心电图特征
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70209
Jianghua Zhang, Xianhui Zhou, Yanmei Lu, Yaodong Li, Qiang Xing, Zukela Tuerhong, Xu Yang, Jiasuoer Xiaokereti, Yankai Guo, Xiaohong Zhou, Samantha Kohnle, Siyuan Zou, Baopeng Tang

Introduction

The leadless pacemakers are implanted routinely under fluoroscopic image, yet the pacing sites and corresponding paced electrocardiography (ECG) remain unclear. This study was to determine the computed tomography (CT)-verified location of the leadless Micra pacemakers (Micra) and ECG characteristics.

Methods

Twenty consecutive patients who met the pacemaker indications for bradycardia and underwent fluoroscopy assisted Micra implantation were enrolled. All subjects underwent a postoperative CT scan to determine the precise location of the Micra pacing tip. Paced 12-lead ECG characteristics were analysed and correlated with the Micra tip location.

Results

In the nine partitions of fluoroscopic RAO images, 14 (70%) of 20 patients had the Micra tip in zone 5, 5 (25%) in zone 6 and 1 in zone 2. Reconstructed CT 3-D cardiac images found Micra tips mostly clustered near the anterior insertion between the RV septum and free wall with 12 cases at the insertion-septal side and 8 at the free-wall side. ECG morphological analysis found that the peak deflection index in ECG lead V1 was 0.409 ± 0.058 for Micra tips at the insertion-septal side and 0.527 ± 0.062 in the free-wall side (p < 0.001 between two sides) and R wave amplitude in lead V6 appeared larger for Micra tips in the free-wall group compared to Micra tips in the insertion-septal group, while there was no difference in QRS duration between two sides.

Conclusion

In routine Micra implantation, the pacing sites were often located in the anterior insertion region.

无导线起搏器在透视下常规植入,但起搏部位和相应的起搏心电图(ECG)仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定计算机断层扫描(CT)验证的无导线Micra起搏器(Micra)的位置和心电图特征。方法连续20例符合起搏器适应症的心动过缓患者行透视辅助Micra植入。所有受试者术后都进行了CT扫描,以确定Micra起搏尖端的精确位置。分析有节奏的12导联心电图特征,并将其与Micra尖端位置相关联。结果20例患者中有14例(70%)Micra尖端位于5区,5例(25%)位于6区,1例位于2区。重建CT三维心脏图像发现,Micra尖端多聚集在右心室间隔与游离壁之间的前止点附近,其中12例位于插入-间隔侧,8例位于游离壁侧。心电形态学分析发现,插入-间隔侧Micra尖端V1导联的峰值偏转指数为0.409±0.058,自由壁侧为0.527±0.062(两边p <; 0.001),自由壁组Micra尖端V6导联的R波幅度大于插入-间隔组Micra尖端,而两侧QRS持续时间无差异。结论在常规Micra植入中,起搏部位多位于前植入区。
{"title":"Computed Tomography-Verified Pacing Location of Micra Leadless Pacemakers and Characteristics of Paced Electrocardiograms in Bradycardia Patients","authors":"Jianghua Zhang,&nbsp;Xianhui Zhou,&nbsp;Yanmei Lu,&nbsp;Yaodong Li,&nbsp;Qiang Xing,&nbsp;Zukela Tuerhong,&nbsp;Xu Yang,&nbsp;Jiasuoer Xiaokereti,&nbsp;Yankai Guo,&nbsp;Xiaohong Zhou,&nbsp;Samantha Kohnle,&nbsp;Siyuan Zou,&nbsp;Baopeng Tang","doi":"10.1002/clc.70209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70209","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The leadless pacemakers are implanted routinely under fluoroscopic image, yet the pacing sites and corresponding paced electrocardiography (ECG) remain unclear. This study was to determine the computed tomography (CT)-verified location of the leadless Micra pacemakers (Micra) and ECG characteristics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty consecutive patients who met the pacemaker indications for bradycardia and underwent fluoroscopy assisted Micra implantation were enrolled. All subjects underwent a postoperative CT scan to determine the precise location of the Micra pacing tip. Paced 12-lead ECG characteristics were analysed and correlated with the Micra tip location.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the nine partitions of fluoroscopic RAO images, 14 (70%) of 20 patients had the Micra tip in zone 5, 5 (25%) in zone 6 and 1 in zone 2. Reconstructed CT 3-D cardiac images found Micra tips mostly clustered near the anterior insertion between the RV septum and free wall with 12 cases at the insertion-septal side and 8 at the free-wall side. ECG morphological analysis found that the peak deflection index in ECG lead V1 was 0.409 ± 0.058 for Micra tips at the insertion-septal side and 0.527 ± 0.062 in the free-wall side (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 between two sides) and <i>R</i> wave amplitude in lead V6 appeared larger for Micra tips in the free-wall group compared to Micra tips in the insertion-septal group, while there was no difference in QRS duration between two sides.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In routine Micra implantation, the pacing sites were often located in the anterior insertion region.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70209","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145230521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Empagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Heart Failure Patients: A 1-Year Comparative Study 恩格列净与达格列净对心力衰竭患者左心室重构的影响:一项为期1年的比较研究
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70192
Mahmoud Balata, Marc Ulrich Becher, Marwa Hassan, Mohamed Rady, Shady Rashed, Usama Alkomi, Marian Christoph, Karim Ibrahim, Akram Youssef

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations in HF patients. However, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unclear, and it is uncertain whether empagliflozin and dapagliflozin have differential effects on cardiac structure and function.

Aim

This study aims to compare the effects of these two SGLT2is on left ventricular echocardiographic parameters in HF patients over 1 year.

Methods

This retrospective study included 558 consecutive HF patients newly prescribed either dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Key echocardiographic parameters, such as peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, left atrial volume index (LAVI), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI), LV mass index (LV-MI), relative wall thickness (RWT), LV sphericity index (LV-SI), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were measured at baseline and after 1 year.

Results

At 1-year, significant reductions were observed only in the empagliflozin group for peak E-wave velocity (mean difference = −12.76 cm/s, 95% CI: −16.26 to −9.27, p < 0.001), E/e' ratio (mean difference = −3.04, 95% CI: −4.17 to −1.91, p < 0.001), and LV sphericity index (LV-SI; mean difference = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.02 to −0.0005, p = 0.040). Both SGLT2is significantly improved E-wave deceleration time, LAVI, LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI, LV-MI, and LVEF. Neither medication produced significant changes in RWT, and no significant differences were noted between groups regarding HF hospitalizations or all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

Empagliflozin demonstrated more pronounced effects on LV remodeling markers, including peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, and LV-SI, compared to dapagliflozin. These findings suggest potential efficacy differences between SGLT2is, highlighting the need for future randomized comparative studies.

背景:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)可降低心衰患者心血管死亡率和心衰相关住院率。然而,这些益处的机制尚不清楚,也不确定恩格列净和达格列净是否对心脏结构和功能有不同的影响。目的:本研究旨在比较这两种SGLT2is对1年以上HF患者左室超声心动图参数的影响。方法:回顾性研究纳入558例连续新开达格列净或恩格列净的HF患者。在基线和1年后分别测量超声心动图关键参数,如峰值E波速度、E/ E比值、左房容积指数(LAVI)、左室舒张末期和收缩末期容积(LV- edvi、LV- esvi)、左室质量指数(LV- mi)、相对壁厚(RWT)、左室球形指数(LV- si)和射血分数(LVEF)。结果:1年后,只有恩帕格列净组的E波峰速度显著降低(平均差值= -12.76 cm/s, 95% CI: -16.26至-9.27,p)。结论:与达格列净相比,恩帕格列净对左室重构标志物的影响更明显,包括E波峰速度、E/ E’比和LV- si。这些发现提示了SGLT2is之间潜在的疗效差异,强调了未来随机比较研究的必要性。
{"title":"Impact of Empagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Heart Failure Patients: A 1-Year Comparative Study","authors":"Mahmoud Balata,&nbsp;Marc Ulrich Becher,&nbsp;Marwa Hassan,&nbsp;Mohamed Rady,&nbsp;Shady Rashed,&nbsp;Usama Alkomi,&nbsp;Marian Christoph,&nbsp;Karim Ibrahim,&nbsp;Akram Youssef","doi":"10.1002/clc.70192","DOIUrl":"10.1002/clc.70192","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations in HF patients. However, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unclear, and it is uncertain whether empagliflozin and dapagliflozin have differential effects on cardiac structure and function.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aims to compare the effects of these two SGLT2is on left ventricular echocardiographic parameters in HF patients over 1 year.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective study included 558 consecutive HF patients newly prescribed either dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Key echocardiographic parameters, such as peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, left atrial volume index (LAVI), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI), LV mass index (LV-MI), relative wall thickness (RWT), LV sphericity index (LV-SI), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were measured at baseline and after 1 year.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>At 1-year, significant reductions were observed only in the empagliflozin group for peak E-wave velocity (mean difference = −12.76 cm/s, 95% CI: −16.26 to −9.27, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), E/e' ratio (mean difference = −3.04, 95% CI: −4.17 to −1.91, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and LV sphericity index (LV-SI; mean difference = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.02 to −0.0005, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Both SGLT2is significantly improved E-wave deceleration time, LAVI, LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI, LV-MI, and LVEF. Neither medication produced significant changes in RWT, and no significant differences were noted between groups regarding HF hospitalizations or all-cause mortality.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Empagliflozin demonstrated more pronounced effects on LV remodeling markers, including peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, and LV-SI, compared to dapagliflozin. These findings suggest potential efficacy differences between SGLT2is, highlighting the need for future randomized comparative studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445616/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145085349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction 急性st段抬高型心肌梗死发生后循证医学联合处方的性别差异评价
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70195
A. Evelo, E. Leegwater, W. J. R. Rietdijk, T. D. Warning, C. E. Schotborgh, L. E. Visser

Aim

To evaluate sex-based differences in the prescription of the combination of evidence-based medicine (cEBM) at discharge after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Secondly, we analysed risk factors for the absence of cEBM after discharge, and examined sex differences in adverse events.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared women to men who were admitted with an acute STEMI at Haga Teaching Hospital between January 2017 and June 2023. The primary outcome was cEBM, defined as an active prescription of the combination of acetylsalicylic acid, P2Y12-inhibitor, ACEi/ARB, beta-blocker, and statin/ezetimibe on the day after discharge.

Results

Among 1467 patients (27% women), women were older than men (74 years vs. 65 years, p < 0.001). cEBM was less often prescribed to women than men (66.0% vs. 72.8%, p = 0.013), primarily due to ACEi/ARB (82.1% vs. 87.7%, p = 0.007) and statins (90.2% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex was not associated with the absence of cEBM (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.73–1.39). Other confounders such as increasing age, decreasing haemoglobin, and oral anticoagulants were correlated with the absence of cEBM.

Conclusions

A smaller proportion of women were prescribed cEBM post-STEMI compared to men. However, this difference disappeared when controlled for other confounders. Also, women remained to have a higher chance for a stroke or death at 6 months post-discharge. These findings highlight the need for further research into sex disparities and their underlying confounders in the field of evidence-based medicine after an acute STEMI.

目的评价急性st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)出院时循证医学联合用药(cEBM)处方的性别差异。其次,我们分析了出院后缺乏cEBM的危险因素,并检查了不良事件的性别差异。方法:本回顾性队列研究比较了2017年1月至2023年6月期间在Haga教学医院因急性STEMI入院的女性和男性。主要终点是cEBM,定义为出院后第一天乙酰水杨酸、p2y12抑制剂、ACEi/ARB、受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物/依折替米贝联合使用的有效处方。结果1467例患者(27%为女性)中,女性年龄大于男性(74岁比65岁,p < 0.001)。女性使用cEBM的频率低于男性(66.0% vs. 72.8%, p = 0.013),主要是由于ACEi/ARB (82.1% vs. 87.7%, p = 0.007)和他汀类药物(90.2% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.001)。在多变量logistic回归分析中,女性与缺乏cEBM无关(优势比(OR) = 1.01, 95%可信区间[95% CI]: 0.73-1.39)。其他混杂因素如年龄增长、血红蛋白下降和口服抗凝剂与cEBM的缺失相关。结论:与男性相比,女性在stemi后服用cEBM的比例较小。然而,当控制其他混杂因素时,这种差异就消失了。此外,女性在出院后6个月中风或死亡的几率仍然较高。这些发现强调了在急性STEMI后的循证医学领域对性别差异及其潜在混杂因素进行进一步研究的必要性。
{"title":"Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"A. Evelo,&nbsp;E. Leegwater,&nbsp;W. J. R. Rietdijk,&nbsp;T. D. Warning,&nbsp;C. E. Schotborgh,&nbsp;L. E. Visser","doi":"10.1002/clc.70195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70195","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate sex-based differences in the prescription of the combination of evidence-based medicine (cEBM) at discharge after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Secondly, we analysed risk factors for the absence of cEBM after discharge, and examined sex differences in adverse events.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective cohort study compared women to men who were admitted with an acute STEMI at Haga Teaching Hospital between January 2017 and June 2023. The primary outcome was cEBM, defined as an active prescription of the combination of acetylsalicylic acid, P2Y<sub>12</sub>-inhibitor, ACEi/ARB, beta-blocker, and statin/ezetimibe on the day after discharge.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 1467 patients (27% women), women were older than men (74 years vs. 65 years, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). cEBM was less often prescribed to women than men (66.0% vs. 72.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.013), primarily due to ACEi/ARB (82.1% vs. 87.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and statins (90.2% vs. 95.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex was not associated with the absence of cEBM (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.73–1.39). Other confounders such as increasing age, decreasing haemoglobin, and oral anticoagulants were correlated with the absence of cEBM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A smaller proportion of women were prescribed cEBM post-STEMI compared to men. However, this difference disappeared when controlled for other confounders. Also, women remained to have a higher chance for a stroke or death at 6 months post-discharge. These findings highlight the need for further research into sex disparities and their underlying confounders in the field of evidence-based medicine after an acute STEMI.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70195","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145062555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acoustic Cardiography (ACG) for Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET) Monitoring in Preeclampsia Risk Prediction 超声心动图(ACG)监测左室射血时间(LVET)在子痫前期风险预测中的应用
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70210
Chunping Tang, Xinxin Zhang, Miao Wang, Yiyuan Xiong, Yingxia Zhu, Qiong Huang, Ningtian Zhou

Background

Preeclampsia (PE), a leading cause of maternal morbidity, lacks reliable early biomarkers. This study evaluates acoustic cardiography (ACG) for noninvasive left ventricular ejection time (LVET) monitoring and its predictive value in PE.

Methods

In an observational case-control study, 59 pregnant women (28 controls, 31 PE cases) underwent synchronized ECG-phonocardiogram (PCG) monitoring using AI-driven devices. LVET, Q2S2Max, and hemodynamic parameters were analyzed.

Hypothesis

ACG predict PE risk via LVET monitoring.

Results

Significantly prolonged LVET in the PE group (320.28 ± 26.79 ms vs. 301.32 ± 35.42 ms, p = 0.026), correlating with increased cardiac afterload. ROC analysis revealed moderate diagnostic efficacy for LVET alone (AUC = 0.658, sensitivity 72.4%, specificity 57.1%). Combining LVET with hypertension history enhanced performance (AUC = 0.776, specificity 77.8%), reducing false positives. Elevated Q2S2Max in PE (426.10 ± 29.46 vs. 403.96 ± 33.28, p = 0.010) indicated vascular stiffness, suggesting early vascular-cardiac coupling dysfunction.

Conclusions

ACG-derived parameters, integrated with clinical risk factors, demonstrated cost-effective, dynamic monitoring potential for early PE detection, particularly in resource-limited settings. While limited by sample size and single-center design, this study highlights ACG as a promising tool for cardiovascular risk stratification in pregnancy, warranting further validation in larger cohorts.

背景子痫前期(PE)是孕产妇发病的主要原因,缺乏可靠的早期生物标志物。本研究评估声学心动图(ACG)在无创左心室射血时间(LVET)监测中的应用及其对PE的预测价值。方法在一项观察性病例-对照研究中,59例孕妇(对照组28例,PE例31例)采用人工智能驱动设备进行同步心电图-心音图(PCG)监测。分析LVET、Q2S2Max及血流动力学参数。假设ACG通过LVET监测预测PE风险。结果PE组LVET明显延长(320.28±26.79 ms vs 301.32±35.42 ms, p = 0.026),与心脏后负荷增加相关。ROC分析显示,单独使用LVET诊断效果中等(AUC = 0.658,敏感性72.4%,特异性57.1%)。LVET与高血压病史结合可提高诊断效率(AUC = 0.776,特异性77.8%),减少假阳性。PE Q2S2Max升高(426.10±29.46 vs 403.96±33.28,p = 0.010)提示血管僵硬,提示早期血管-心脏偶联功能障碍。结论acg衍生参数与临床风险因素相结合,具有成本效益,具有动态监测早期肺泡检测的潜力,特别是在资源有限的情况下。虽然受样本量和单中心设计的限制,本研究强调ACG作为妊娠期心血管风险分层的有前景的工具,需要在更大的队列中进一步验证。
{"title":"Acoustic Cardiography (ACG) for Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET) Monitoring in Preeclampsia Risk Prediction","authors":"Chunping Tang,&nbsp;Xinxin Zhang,&nbsp;Miao Wang,&nbsp;Yiyuan Xiong,&nbsp;Yingxia Zhu,&nbsp;Qiong Huang,&nbsp;Ningtian Zhou","doi":"10.1002/clc.70210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70210","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Preeclampsia (PE), a leading cause of maternal morbidity, lacks reliable early biomarkers. This study evaluates acoustic cardiography (ACG) for noninvasive left ventricular ejection time (LVET) monitoring and its predictive value in PE.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In an observational case-control study, 59 pregnant women (28 controls, 31 PE cases) underwent synchronized ECG-phonocardiogram (PCG) monitoring using AI-driven devices. LVET, Q2S2Max, and hemodynamic parameters were analyzed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>ACG predict PE risk via LVET monitoring.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Significantly prolonged LVET in the PE group (320.28 ± 26.79 ms vs. 301.32 ± 35.42 ms, <i>p</i> = 0.026), correlating with increased cardiac afterload. ROC analysis revealed moderate diagnostic efficacy for LVET alone (AUC = 0.658, sensitivity 72.4%, specificity 57.1%). Combining LVET with hypertension history enhanced performance (AUC = 0.776, specificity 77.8%), reducing false positives. Elevated Q2S2Max in PE (426.10 ± 29.46 vs. 403.96 ± 33.28, <i>p</i> = 0.010) indicated vascular stiffness, suggesting early vascular-cardiac coupling dysfunction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>ACG-derived parameters, integrated with clinical risk factors, demonstrated cost-effective, dynamic monitoring potential for early PE detection, particularly in resource-limited settings. While limited by sample size and single-center design, this study highlights ACG as a promising tool for cardiovascular risk stratification in pregnancy, warranting further validation in larger cohorts.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70210","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145062606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Effectiveness of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Inhibitors on Lipid Profiles in Adults With Hyperlipidemia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 胆固醇酯转移蛋白(CETP)抑制剂对成人高脂血症患者脂质谱的比较效果:随机对照试验的综合系统评价和频率网络荟萃分析
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70204
Ibrahim Khalil, M. Rafiqul Islam, Sunjida Amin Promi, Arindam Das Joy, Md Abu Sayed, Durjoy Acharjee, Ali Saad Al-shammari, Sakib Abrar, Ta-Seen Bin Jamil, Malaika Taseen, Suborna Biswas, Sumaya Khan Mifty, Sajjad Ghanim Al-Badri, Avijit Debnath, Md. Imran Hossain, Mahmuda Akter

Background

Hyperlipidemia, a key risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, such as anacetrapib, obicetrapib, evacetrapib, dalcetrapib, and torcetrapib, aim to improve lipid profiles by increasing HDL-C and reducing LDL-C, but their comparative efficacy remains unclear.

Methods

This systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis, conducted per PRISMA-NMA guidelines, included 33 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 120,292 adults with hyperlipidemia. We compared CETP inhibitors, alone or with statins, against placebo or other lipid-lowering therapies. Primary outcome was LDL-C reduction; secondary outcomes included HDL-C, triglycerides, and total cholesterol changes. Random-effects models calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P-scores ranked interventions.

Results

Atorvastatin + obicetrapib showed the largest reduction in LDL-C levels (MD: −69.00, 95% CI: −95.96 to −42.04, p < 0.0001), followed by rosuvastatin + obicetrapib (MD: −60.70, 95% CI: −99.28 to −22.12, p = 0.0020). Atorvastatin + obicetrapib yielded highly significant increase in HDL-C levels (MD: 149.90, 95% CI: 121.70 to 178.10, p < 0.0001), but rosuvastatin + obicetrapib showed the greatest increase (MD: 158.90, 95% CI: 118.59 to 199.21, p < 0.0001) and obicetrapib monotherapy (MD: 139.00, 95% CI: 129.05 to 148.96, p < 0.0001), while rosuvastatin + evacetrapib led triglyceride reductions (MD: −31.70 mg/dL). Rosuvastatin was most effective for total cholesterol (MD: −31.60 mg/dL).

Conclusion

CETP inhibitors, particularly anacetrapib and obicetrapib combined with statins, significantly improve lipid profiles, offering potential therapeutic benefits for hyperlipidemia management and cardiovascular risk reduction.

Trial Registration: The study was registered with PROSPERO to ensure transparency and adherence to methodological rigor (Registration ID: CRD420250652666).

背景:高脂血症是心血管疾病的关键危险因素,其特征是低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、甘油三酯升高和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)降低。胆固醇酯转移蛋白(CETP)抑制剂,如anacetrapib、obicetrapib、evacetrapib、dalcetrapib和torcetrapib,旨在通过增加HDL-C和降低LDL-C来改善脂质谱,但其相对疗效尚不清楚。方法根据PRISMA-NMA指南进行系统评价和频率网络荟萃分析,纳入33项随机对照试验(rct),涉及120,292名高脂血症成人。我们比较了CETP抑制剂单独使用或与他汀类药物联合使用与安慰剂或其他降脂疗法的效果。主要终点为LDL-C降低;次要结局包括HDL-C、甘油三酯和总胆固醇的变化。随机效应模型以95%置信区间(CI)计算平均差异(MD),并对干预措施进行p评分排序。结果阿托伐他汀+ obicetrapib组LDL-C水平降低幅度最大(MD: - 69.00, 95% CI: - 95.96 ~ - 42.04, p < 0.0001),其次是瑞舒伐他汀+ obicetrapib组(MD: - 60.70, 95% CI: - 99.28 ~ - 22.12, p = 0.0020)。阿托伐他汀+奥比西拉布使HDL-C水平显著升高(MD: 149.90, 95% CI: 121.70 ~ 178.10, p < 0.0001),但瑞舒伐他汀+奥比西拉布单用治疗的升高幅度最大(MD: 158.90, 95% CI: 118.59 ~ 199.21, p < 0.0001),而瑞舒伐他汀+奥比西拉布导致甘油三酯降低(MD: - 31.70 mg/dL)。瑞舒伐他汀对总胆固醇最有效(MD:−31.60 mg/dL)。结论CETP抑制剂,特别是anacetrapib和obicetrapib联合他汀类药物可显著改善血脂谱,为高脂血症治疗和心血管风险降低提供潜在的治疗益处。试验注册:该研究已在PROSPERO注册,以确保透明度和方法严密性(注册ID: CRD420250652666)。
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Inhibitors on Lipid Profiles in Adults With Hyperlipidemia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Ibrahim Khalil,&nbsp;M. Rafiqul Islam,&nbsp;Sunjida Amin Promi,&nbsp;Arindam Das Joy,&nbsp;Md Abu Sayed,&nbsp;Durjoy Acharjee,&nbsp;Ali Saad Al-shammari,&nbsp;Sakib Abrar,&nbsp;Ta-Seen Bin Jamil,&nbsp;Malaika Taseen,&nbsp;Suborna Biswas,&nbsp;Sumaya Khan Mifty,&nbsp;Sajjad Ghanim Al-Badri,&nbsp;Avijit Debnath,&nbsp;Md. Imran Hossain,&nbsp;Mahmuda Akter","doi":"10.1002/clc.70204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70204","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Hyperlipidemia, a key risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, such as anacetrapib, obicetrapib, evacetrapib, dalcetrapib, and torcetrapib, aim to improve lipid profiles by increasing HDL-C and reducing LDL-C, but their comparative efficacy remains unclear.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis, conducted per PRISMA-NMA guidelines, included 33 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 120,292 adults with hyperlipidemia. We compared CETP inhibitors, alone or with statins, against placebo or other lipid-lowering therapies. Primary outcome was LDL-C reduction; secondary outcomes included HDL-C, triglycerides, and total cholesterol changes. Random-effects models calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P-scores ranked interventions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Atorvastatin + obicetrapib showed the largest reduction in LDL-C levels (MD: −69.00, 95% CI: −95.96 to −42.04, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), followed by rosuvastatin + obicetrapib (MD: −60.70, 95% CI: −99.28 to −22.12, <i>p</i> = 0.0020). Atorvastatin + obicetrapib yielded highly significant increase in HDL-C levels (MD: 149.90, 95% CI: 121.70 to 178.10, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), but rosuvastatin + obicetrapib showed the greatest increase (MD: 158.90, 95% CI: 118.59 to 199.21, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and obicetrapib monotherapy (MD: 139.00, 95% CI: 129.05 to 148.96, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), while rosuvastatin + evacetrapib led triglyceride reductions (MD: −31.70 mg/dL). Rosuvastatin was most effective for total cholesterol (MD: −31.60 mg/dL).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CETP inhibitors, particularly anacetrapib and obicetrapib combined with statins, significantly improve lipid profiles, offering potential therapeutic benefits for hyperlipidemia management and cardiovascular risk reduction.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> The study was registered with <b>PROSPERO</b> to ensure transparency and adherence to methodological rigor (Registration ID: CRD420250652666).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70204","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145062607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Bridging Guidelines and Real World Barriers: Reflections on GDMT Optimization in Heart Failure” 弥合指南和现实世界的障碍:对心力衰竭GDMT优化的思考
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70206
Ibadullah Tahir, Hunain Shahbaz, Aimal Khattak
<p>Velasco et al. address a critical issue in contemporary HF care by examining titration limiting adverse effects (AEs) in a specialized guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization program [<span>1</span>]. In their single center cohort (<i>n</i> = 254 completers), 59% of patients encountered ≥ 1 AE (hypotension, bradycardia, hyperkalemia, renal dysfunction) hindering GDMT titration [<span>1</span>]. Notably, younger, nonischemic patients more often reached target doses. These observations underscore the reality that, despite guidelines advocating quadruple therapy (ARNi/ACEi/ARB, beta-blockers, MRA, SGLT2i) for HFrEF [<span>2</span>] real world implementation lags: fewer than one in five eligible patients currently receive all four classes [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Velasco et al. are to be commended for quantifying AE rates within an intensive titration program and for analyzing predictors of submaximal dosing (e.g., older age and atrial fibrillation predicted lower beta blocker titration) [<span>1</span>]. This granular approach highlights important heterogeneity: for example, patients without hypertension or with atrial fibrillation had more difficulty up titrating renin angiotensin blockers [<span>1</span>]. Such findings point to the need for personalized strategies. However, the study's retrospective, single center design and focus on program completers may limit generalizability. Patients who discontinued the program (perhaps due to severe intolerance) were excluded; thus the true burden of AEs may be underestimated. Only four AE domains were assessed, omitting others (e.g., volume depletion, gastrointestinal symptoms, or device-related issues) that can also limit GDMT. Finally, standardized definitions of “titration limiting” AEs were not detailed. As the authors note, establishing uniform AE criteria is essential for comparing programs and guiding practice [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Importantly, Velasco's results should be interpreted alongside broader barriers to GDMT uptake. Systematic reviews and registry data have documented multifactorial obstacles including clinician inertia, patient comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and health system challenges that suppress GDMT use [<span>2, 5</span>]. The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline reiterates that quadruple GDMT markedly improves survival and symptoms, yet emphasizes tailoring therapy to individual patient risk/benefit profiles [<span>3</span>]. Similarly, recent ACC consensus guidance highlights “special cohorts” (older adults, frailty, coexisting organ dysfunction, and socioeconomic barriers) that necessitate flexible GDMT strategies [<span>6</span>]. In this light, Velasco's finding that obesity was associated with higher titration success may reflect survivor bias or phenotype differences, and warrants further study.</p><p>Where Velasco et al. add value is by quantifying how often AEs intrude on a dedicated titration effort. Their high AE rate parallels other quality improvement
Velasco等人通过在专门指导药物治疗(GDMT)优化程序[1]中检查滴定限制不良反应(ae),解决了当代心衰护理中的一个关键问题。在他们的单中心队列中(n = 254名完成者),59%的患者出现≥1次AE(低血压、心动过缓、高钾血症、肾功能不全),阻碍GDMT滴定[1]。值得注意的是,年轻的非缺血性患者更容易达到目标剂量。这些观察结果强调了这样一个现实:尽管指南提倡对HFrEF[5]进行四联治疗(ARNi/ACEi/ARB、β受体阻滞剂、MRA、SGLT2i),但现实世界的实施滞后:目前只有不到五分之一的符合条件的患者接受了所有四类[5]。Velasco等人量化了强化滴定方案中的AE率,并分析了亚最大剂量的预测因子(例如,老年人和房颤预测较低的阻滞剂滴定)[1]。这种颗粒状方法突出了重要的异质性:例如,没有高血压或房颤的患者在滴定肾素血管紧张素阻滞剂[1]时更困难。这些发现表明了个性化策略的必要性。然而,该研究的回顾性、单中心设计和对项目完成者的关注可能限制了通用性。停止治疗的患者(可能是由于严重的不耐受)被排除在外;因此,ae的真正负担可能被低估了。仅评估了四个AE域,忽略了其他可能限制GDMT的域(例如,体积损耗、胃肠道症状或设备相关问题)。最后,“滴定极限”ae的标准化定义没有详细说明。正如作者所指出的那样,建立统一的AE标准对于比较方案和指导实践是至关重要的。重要的是,Velasco的结果应该与GDMT吸收的更广泛障碍一起解释。系统回顾和登记数据记录了多因素障碍,包括临床医生惰性、患者合并症、社会经济因素和卫生系统挑战,这些因素抑制了GDMT的使用[2,5]。2022年AHA/ACC/HFSA指南重申,四倍GDMT可显著改善生存和症状,但强调根据患者个体风险/获益情况量身定制治疗方案[10]。同样,最近的ACC共识指南强调了“特殊人群”(老年人、体弱者、共存的器官功能障碍和社会经济障碍)需要灵活的GDMT策略[10]。鉴于此,Velasco的发现肥胖与较高的滴定成功率相关,可能反映了幸存者偏见或表型差异,值得进一步研究。Velasco等人增加价值的地方是通过量化AEs侵入专用滴定工作的频率。他们的高不良反应发生率与其他质量改进经验相似:例如,护士/药剂师领导的滴定计划在6个月前达到了80%的患者GDMT目标,但这是在强化随访和患者教育之后。同样,最近在远程监测滴定诊所进行的一项试点试验显示,与常规护理相比,GDMT“评分”有了显著改善,这表明创新的护理模式可以部分克服障碍。综合这种多学科或远程保健方法可以通过更频繁地监测和调整剂量来减轻一些不良反应。应该包括前瞻性研究:(1)纳入患者报告的结果和生活质量指标,(2)评估安全加速GDMT的策略(如STRONG HF试验的结果),以及(3)开发决策支持工具来标记高危患者。Velasco等人正确地呼吁就GDMT相关ae的定义达成共识[10];同时,我们需要预测模型来确定谁将从较慢的滴定和较快的滴定中受益。重要的是,解决非AE障碍(药物获取、依从性支持、护理协调)也同样至关重要。总之,Velasco等人提供了关于GDMT优化复杂性的有价值的真实世界数据[1]。他们的发现提醒我们,从生理到行为的人为因素塑造了GDMT的实施。通过认识到这些细微差别,同时继续追求强化滴定,心衰社区可以向真正以患者为中心的护理迈进。所有作者都已阅读并批准了稿件的最终版本。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"“Bridging Guidelines and Real World Barriers: Reflections on GDMT Optimization in Heart Failure”","authors":"Ibadullah Tahir,&nbsp;Hunain Shahbaz,&nbsp;Aimal Khattak","doi":"10.1002/clc.70206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70206","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Velasco et al. address a critical issue in contemporary HF care by examining titration limiting adverse effects (AEs) in a specialized guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization program [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. In their single center cohort (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 254 completers), 59% of patients encountered ≥ 1 AE (hypotension, bradycardia, hyperkalemia, renal dysfunction) hindering GDMT titration [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Notably, younger, nonischemic patients more often reached target doses. These observations underscore the reality that, despite guidelines advocating quadruple therapy (ARNi/ACEi/ARB, beta-blockers, MRA, SGLT2i) for HFrEF [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;] real world implementation lags: fewer than one in five eligible patients currently receive all four classes [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Velasco et al. are to be commended for quantifying AE rates within an intensive titration program and for analyzing predictors of submaximal dosing (e.g., older age and atrial fibrillation predicted lower beta blocker titration) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. This granular approach highlights important heterogeneity: for example, patients without hypertension or with atrial fibrillation had more difficulty up titrating renin angiotensin blockers [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Such findings point to the need for personalized strategies. However, the study's retrospective, single center design and focus on program completers may limit generalizability. Patients who discontinued the program (perhaps due to severe intolerance) were excluded; thus the true burden of AEs may be underestimated. Only four AE domains were assessed, omitting others (e.g., volume depletion, gastrointestinal symptoms, or device-related issues) that can also limit GDMT. Finally, standardized definitions of “titration limiting” AEs were not detailed. As the authors note, establishing uniform AE criteria is essential for comparing programs and guiding practice [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Importantly, Velasco's results should be interpreted alongside broader barriers to GDMT uptake. Systematic reviews and registry data have documented multifactorial obstacles including clinician inertia, patient comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and health system challenges that suppress GDMT use [&lt;span&gt;2, 5&lt;/span&gt;]. The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline reiterates that quadruple GDMT markedly improves survival and symptoms, yet emphasizes tailoring therapy to individual patient risk/benefit profiles [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Similarly, recent ACC consensus guidance highlights “special cohorts” (older adults, frailty, coexisting organ dysfunction, and socioeconomic barriers) that necessitate flexible GDMT strategies [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. In this light, Velasco's finding that obesity was associated with higher titration success may reflect survivor bias or phenotype differences, and warrants further study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Where Velasco et al. add value is by quantifying how often AEs intrude on a dedicated titration effort. Their high AE rate parallels other quality improvement","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70206","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145021937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critique on “Evaluation of the Presence of Native Valvular Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the EHRA (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic, or Artificial) Classification” 对“用EHRA(评估心瓣膜、风湿性或人工)分类评估心房颤动患者是否存在先天性瓣膜疾病”的评论
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70207
Arooha Javed, Syed Muhammad Savez, Syed Muhammad Rayyan
<p>We read with great interest the article “Evaluation of the Presence of Native Valvular Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the EHRA (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic, or Artificial) Classification” by Escolar Conesa et al [<span>1</span>]. A critical clinical question is examined by Escolar Conesa et al that: Does a patient with native valvular disease (EHRA-2) have a different prognosis than a patient without valve involvement (EHRA-3) in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)? The authors report significantly higher rates of major bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and MACE in EHRA-2 patients in a large multicenter cohort (<i>n</i> = 1399) with a median follow-up of approximately 910 days. They also demonstrate that EHRA-2 status remained an independent predictor following multivariable adjustment [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The authors' use of a large, real-world data set and their publication of incident rates per 100 patient-years, a clinically valuable statistic, are commendable. Their straightforward explanation of baseline differences and Cox models makes the main point very evident: native valve involvement in AF is not harmless and should be taken into consideration when determining risk and selecting anticoagulation.</p><p>The immediate application of these discoveries to routine practice is limited by several challenges. Mild degenerative regurgitation, aortic stenosis, previous biological prosthesis, and other lesions are all grouped under the EHRA-2 category. These entities are pathophysiologically distinct and probably pose different risks; the observer cannot determine which valve lesions are the main drivers of the signal without lesion-specific subgroup studies [<span>2</span>]. The study acknowledges the lack of standardized echocardiographic grading. Prognosis and treatment depend on severity (e.g., mild vs. moderate aortic stenosis or regurgitation); combining all native lesions into one category runs the danger of misclassifying clinical risk [<span>1</span>]. EHRA-2 patients had higher HAS-BLED and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores and were older. The connection may be partially explained by unmeasured confounders (frailty, frail-functional status, and hemodynamics related to the valves), even if adjusted models partially address this. After substantial correction, previous research indicated that the EHRA-2 signal attenuated [<span>3</span>]. Sicker patients or those with less access to monitoring may prefer to stay on VKA, which could explain the apparent protective correlation of DOACs vs VKAs. Causal inference would be strengthened by using instrumental variable techniques, inverse probability weighting, or propensity matching [<span>4</span>]. Only baseline measurements of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED were made; events and comorbidity accrual over ~2.5 years may change treatment and risk choices. Updated analysis would more accurately represent clinical practice [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Futur
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Escolar Conesa等人的文章《用EHRA(评估心瓣膜、风湿或人工)分类评估心房颤动患者存在原生瓣膜疾病》[10]。Escolar Conesa等人研究了一个关键的临床问题:在抗凝房颤(AF)患者中,患有先天性瓣膜疾病(EHRA-2)的患者与没有瓣膜受累(EHRA-3)的患者预后是否不同?作者报告了一个大型多中心队列(n = 1399)中位随访约910天的EHRA-2患者的大出血、心血管死亡率、心力衰竭和MACE发生率显著升高。他们还证明,EHRA-2状态在多变量调整后仍然是一个独立的预测因子。作者使用了大量真实世界的数据,并公布了每100例患者年的发病率,这是一个有临床价值的统计数据,值得称赞。他们对基线差异和Cox模型的直截了当的解释使得主要观点非常明显:房颤的原生瓣膜受累不是无害的,在确定风险和选择抗凝治疗时应考虑到这一点。这些发现在日常实践中的直接应用受到一些挑战的限制。轻度退行性反流、主动脉狭窄、既往生物假体等病变均归为EHRA-2类。这些实体在病理生理上是不同的,可能构成不同的风险;如果没有病变特异性亚组研究[2],观察者无法确定哪个瓣膜病变是信号的主要驱动因素。该研究承认缺乏标准化的超声心动图分级。预后和治疗取决于严重程度(例如,轻度vs中度主动脉狭窄或反流);将所有原发病变归为一类有误诊临床风险b[1]的危险。EHRA-2患者的ha - bled和CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分较高,且年龄较大。即使调整后的模型部分地解决了这一问题,这种联系也可能部分地被未测量的混杂因素(虚弱、功能不全状态和与瓣膜相关的血流动力学)所解释。经过大量修正后,以往的研究表明EHRA-2信号衰减[3]。病情较重的患者或较少获得监测的患者可能更愿意继续使用VKA,这可以解释DOACs与VKA之间明显的保护性相关性。通过使用工具变量技术、逆概率加权或倾向匹配[4],可以加强因果推理。仅基线测量CHA₂、DS₂、vasc和ha - bled;超过2.5年的事件和合并症可能改变治疗和风险选择。更新的分析将更准确地代表临床实践[1]。未来的研究应该(a)记录超声心动图病变的种类和严重程度,(b)进行病变特异性结果分析,(c)使用倾向/因果方法比较抗凝剂,(d)考虑时间更新的风险评级。这些措施如果得到验证,将有助于提高目前接近推荐临界值的患者的抗凝阈值,正如2020年ESC房颤管理指南所强调的那样。总之,Escolar Conesa等人提供了一个关键的指标,即“非瓣膜性”房颤是多种多样的:天然瓣膜受累可以识别出少数血栓和出血风险增加的患者,需要更仔细的检查和专门的治疗。房颤与瓣膜性心脏病之间的相互作用及其对抗凝治疗的影响在最近的综述中得到了强调[6,7]。为了指导临床治疗,这项工作应该刺激前瞻性的、病变分层的研究。作者没有什么可报告的。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Critique on “Evaluation of the Presence of Native Valvular Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the EHRA (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic, or Artificial) Classification”","authors":"Arooha Javed,&nbsp;Syed Muhammad Savez,&nbsp;Syed Muhammad Rayyan","doi":"10.1002/clc.70207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70207","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We read with great interest the article “Evaluation of the Presence of Native Valvular Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the EHRA (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic, or Artificial) Classification” by Escolar Conesa et al [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. A critical clinical question is examined by Escolar Conesa et al that: Does a patient with native valvular disease (EHRA-2) have a different prognosis than a patient without valve involvement (EHRA-3) in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)? The authors report significantly higher rates of major bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and MACE in EHRA-2 patients in a large multicenter cohort (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 1399) with a median follow-up of approximately 910 days. They also demonstrate that EHRA-2 status remained an independent predictor following multivariable adjustment [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors' use of a large, real-world data set and their publication of incident rates per 100 patient-years, a clinically valuable statistic, are commendable. Their straightforward explanation of baseline differences and Cox models makes the main point very evident: native valve involvement in AF is not harmless and should be taken into consideration when determining risk and selecting anticoagulation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The immediate application of these discoveries to routine practice is limited by several challenges. Mild degenerative regurgitation, aortic stenosis, previous biological prosthesis, and other lesions are all grouped under the EHRA-2 category. These entities are pathophysiologically distinct and probably pose different risks; the observer cannot determine which valve lesions are the main drivers of the signal without lesion-specific subgroup studies [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. The study acknowledges the lack of standardized echocardiographic grading. Prognosis and treatment depend on severity (e.g., mild vs. moderate aortic stenosis or regurgitation); combining all native lesions into one category runs the danger of misclassifying clinical risk [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. EHRA-2 patients had higher HAS-BLED and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores and were older. The connection may be partially explained by unmeasured confounders (frailty, frail-functional status, and hemodynamics related to the valves), even if adjusted models partially address this. After substantial correction, previous research indicated that the EHRA-2 signal attenuated [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. Sicker patients or those with less access to monitoring may prefer to stay on VKA, which could explain the apparent protective correlation of DOACs vs VKAs. Causal inference would be strengthened by using instrumental variable techniques, inverse probability weighting, or propensity matching [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. Only baseline measurements of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED were made; events and comorbidity accrual over ~2.5 years may change treatment and risk choices. Updated analysis would more accurately represent clinical practice [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Futur","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70207","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145012642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SGLT2 Inhibitors and Sleep Quality in Heart Failure: Implications for Patient-Centered Outcomes 心衰患者的SGLT2抑制剂和睡眠质量:以患者为中心的结局
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70208
Surender Himral, Jaibharat Sharma, Shivali Sandal, Kunal Mahajan

We read with great interest the article by Erbay et al. [1] evaluating the impact of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on sleep quality, anxiety, and quality of life in patients with heart failure (HF). The study contributes meaningfully to the dialog surrounding patient-centered outcomes in HF management. However, several important methodological limitations essential for interpretation were not sufficiently discussed in the manuscript. First, the nonrandomized, physician-directed allocation of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in this study introduces a substantial potential for selection bias and confounding by indication. Physicians may preferentially prescribe SGLT2 inhibitors to patients who are perceived to be more likely to benefit, be clinically stable, or demonstrate better adherence [2]. Such confounding can extend beyond the measured baseline parameters and affect both clinical and subjective outcomes, including sleep and anxiety. Second, the study groups were imbalanced with respect to key baseline characteristics: the SGLT2 cohort was notably younger and had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM). Both age and DM status independently alter sleep architecture, anxiety, and overall quality of life, increasing the risk that these factors, rather than the intervention itself, underpin the observed improvements [3]. In small sample sizes, the capacity to statistically adjust for these complex interrelations is inherently limited. Third, sleep quality assessment in the study relied solely on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a validated but subjective questionnaire, without incorporating objective sleep measures such as actigraphy or polysomnography. Given the high prevalence of undiagnosed sleep-disordered breathing in HF and the recognized limitations of self-reported measures in this population, the absence of objective evaluation may introduce measurement bias and limit causal inference [4]. Fourth, the study is limited by its short follow-up duration (6 months) and the absence of granular data on changes in concurrent HF and psychotropic medications during follow-up. Short-term improvements may not be sustained over time, and undocumented modifications in concomitant therapy can confound the attribution of the observed benefits exclusively to SGLT2 inhibitors. Furthermore, differential attrition, particularly resulting from hospitalization or mortality, exacerbates the potential for survivor bias [5], a critical consideration in the HF population. Taken together, these limitations underscore the need for cautious interpretation of the reported benefits and reinforce the imperative for future randomized, controlled, and objectively assessed studies with longer follow-ups to establish the patient-centered efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in HF.

All authors contributed to the writing of the correspondence and have approved the fina

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Erbay等人的文章,评估了钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 (SGLT2)抑制剂对心力衰竭(HF)患者睡眠质量、焦虑和生活质量的影响。该研究为围绕心衰管理中以患者为中心的结果的对话做出了有意义的贡献。然而,几个重要的方法上的限制必不可少的解释没有充分讨论在手稿。首先,在本研究中,SGLT2抑制剂治疗的非随机、医生指导的分配引入了大量潜在的选择偏倚和适应症混淆。医生可能会优先给那些被认为更有可能受益、临床稳定或表现出更好依从性的患者开SGLT2抑制剂。这种混淆可能超出测量的基线参数,并影响临床和主观结果,包括睡眠和焦虑。其次,研究组在关键基线特征方面不平衡:SGLT2队列明显更年轻,糖尿病(DM)患病率明显更高。年龄和糖尿病状态独立地改变睡眠结构、焦虑和整体生活质量,增加了这些因素(而不是干预本身)支撑观察到的改善的风险。在小样本量中,对这些复杂的相互关系进行统计调整的能力是有限的。第三,研究中的睡眠质量评估仅依赖于匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI),这是一份经过验证但主观的问卷,没有纳入客观的睡眠测量,如活动记录仪或多导睡眠仪。鉴于心衰患者中未确诊的睡眠呼吸障碍的高发率,以及在这一人群中自我报告测量的公认局限性,缺乏客观评估可能会引入测量偏差,并限制因果推断bbb。第四,该研究的局限性在于其随访时间较短(6个月),并且缺乏随访期间并发心衰和精神药物变化的详细数据。短期的改善可能不会持续一段时间,并且合并治疗中未记录的改变可能会混淆SGLT2抑制剂所观察到的益处的归因。此外,不同的减员,特别是住院或死亡导致的减员,加剧了幸存者偏倚[5]的可能性,这是心衰人群的一个关键考虑因素。综上所述,这些局限性强调了谨慎解释所报道的益处的必要性,并强调了未来随机、对照和客观评估研究的必要性,这些研究需要更长时间的随访,以确定SGLT2抑制剂在心衰中的以患者为中心的疗效。所有作者都对信件的写作做出了贡献,并批准了最终版本。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"SGLT2 Inhibitors and Sleep Quality in Heart Failure: Implications for Patient-Centered Outcomes","authors":"Surender Himral,&nbsp;Jaibharat Sharma,&nbsp;Shivali Sandal,&nbsp;Kunal Mahajan","doi":"10.1002/clc.70208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70208","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest the article by Erbay et al. [<span>1</span>] evaluating the impact of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on sleep quality, anxiety, and quality of life in patients with heart failure (HF). The study contributes meaningfully to the dialog surrounding patient-centered outcomes in HF management. However, several important methodological limitations essential for interpretation were not sufficiently discussed in the manuscript. First, the nonrandomized, physician-directed allocation of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in this study introduces a substantial potential for selection bias and confounding by indication. Physicians may preferentially prescribe SGLT2 inhibitors to patients who are perceived to be more likely to benefit, be clinically stable, or demonstrate better adherence [<span>2</span>]. Such confounding can extend beyond the measured baseline parameters and affect both clinical and subjective outcomes, including sleep and anxiety. Second, the study groups were imbalanced with respect to key baseline characteristics: the SGLT2 cohort was notably younger and had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM). Both age and DM status independently alter sleep architecture, anxiety, and overall quality of life, increasing the risk that these factors, rather than the intervention itself, underpin the observed improvements [<span>3</span>]. In small sample sizes, the capacity to statistically adjust for these complex interrelations is inherently limited. Third, sleep quality assessment in the study relied solely on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a validated but subjective questionnaire, without incorporating objective sleep measures such as actigraphy or polysomnography. Given the high prevalence of undiagnosed sleep-disordered breathing in HF and the recognized limitations of self-reported measures in this population, the absence of objective evaluation may introduce measurement bias and limit causal inference [<span>4</span>]. Fourth, the study is limited by its short follow-up duration (6 months) and the absence of granular data on changes in concurrent HF and psychotropic medications during follow-up. Short-term improvements may not be sustained over time, and undocumented modifications in concomitant therapy can confound the attribution of the observed benefits exclusively to SGLT2 inhibitors. Furthermore, differential attrition, particularly resulting from hospitalization or mortality, exacerbates the potential for survivor bias [<span>5</span>], a critical consideration in the HF population. Taken together, these limitations underscore the need for cautious interpretation of the reported benefits and reinforce the imperative for future randomized, controlled, and objectively assessed studies with longer follow-ups to establish the patient-centered efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in HF.</p><p>All authors contributed to the writing of the correspondence and have approved the fina","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70208","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145012645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methodological and Statistical Concerns Regarding “Can Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors Improve Sleep Quality, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure?” 关于“钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂能否改善心力衰竭患者的睡眠质量、焦虑和生活质量?”的方法学和统计学关注?
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1002/clc.70203
Rajeev Gupta, Shekhar Vohra, Anshul Yadav, Neelesh Gupta, Rohit Mody

The recent article by Erbay et al. reporting improved sleep quality, anxiety, and quality of life in heart failure patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors [1] addresses a clinically important but underexplored area. However, several methodological limitations merit attention before these findings are generalized.

First, there was a significant baseline imbalance in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores between groups (5.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.036). This difference, favoring the SGLT2 inhibitor group at baseline, may partially explain the magnitude of improvement observed. While within-group analyses were performed, regression models should have included baseline PSQI as a covariate to mitigate this confounding [2].

Second, the multivariate logistic regression did not adjust for several potential confounders that could influence patient-reported outcomes, including changes in diuretic dosing, concurrent initiation of other guideline-directed medical therapies, and intercurrent hospitalizations. These variables are known to impact congestion, sleep, and mood in heart failure [3, 4].

Third, the subgroup analyses by ejection fraction status are based on small sample sizes, limiting statistical power and precision. Without reporting interaction p-values, the assertion of consistent benefit across EF strata is premature [5].

Fourth, multiple SF-36 domains and other secondary outcomes were tested without correction for multiplicity. In this setting, the risk of false-positive findings is high, particularly in small observational cohorts [6].

Lastly, the study's observational, single-center design precludes definitive causal inference, yet several statements in the discussion imply a treatment effect. This language should be tempered to reflect association rather than causation [7].

Given the increasing integration of SGLT2 inhibitors into heart failure care, it is critical that conclusions about novel patient-reported benefits be supported by rigorous methodology. Randomized controlled trials incorporating objective sleep measures (e.g., polysomnography) and adequate adjustment for confounding are needed to validate these intriguing findings.

Use of AI for paraphrasing and in analyzing the statistical model used in the study.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Erbay等人最近发表的一篇文章报道,接受SGLT2抑制剂[1]治疗的心力衰竭患者的睡眠质量、焦虑和生活质量得到改善,这是一个临床重要但尚未得到充分探索的领域。然而,在推广这些发现之前,有几个方法上的局限性值得注意。首先,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分在两组之间存在显著的基线不平衡(5.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.036)。这种差异,在基线时有利于SGLT2抑制剂组,可能部分解释了观察到的改善幅度。在进行组内分析时,回归模型应包括基线PSQI作为协变量,以减轻这种混淆。其次,多变量logistic回归没有调整可能影响患者报告结果的几个潜在混杂因素,包括利尿剂剂量的变化,同时开始其他指南指导的药物治疗,以及同时住院治疗。已知这些变量会影响心力衰竭患者的充血、睡眠和情绪[3,4]。第三,通过射血分数状态进行的亚组分析基于小样本量,限制了统计能力和精度。如果不报告相互作用的p值,断言EF地层的一致效益是不成熟的。第四,对多个SF-36结构域和其他次要结果进行检验,但未对多重性进行校正。在这种情况下,假阳性结果的风险很高,特别是在小型观察队列中。最后,该研究的观察性、单中心设计排除了明确的因果推理,但讨论中的几个陈述暗示了治疗效果。这种措辞应该有所缓和,以反映关联,而不是因果关系。鉴于SGLT2抑制剂越来越多地整合到心力衰竭治疗中,关于新的患者报告益处的结论得到严格方法的支持是至关重要的。为了验证这些有趣的发现,需要随机对照试验,包括客观睡眠测量(例如,多导睡眠图)和对混杂因素的适当调整。使用人工智能来解释和分析研究中使用的统计模型。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Methodological and Statistical Concerns Regarding “Can Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors Improve Sleep Quality, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure?”","authors":"Rajeev Gupta,&nbsp;Shekhar Vohra,&nbsp;Anshul Yadav,&nbsp;Neelesh Gupta,&nbsp;Rohit Mody","doi":"10.1002/clc.70203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70203","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recent article by Erbay et al. reporting improved sleep quality, anxiety, and quality of life in heart failure patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors [<span>1</span>] addresses a clinically important but underexplored area. However, several methodological limitations merit attention before these findings are generalized.</p><p>First, there was a significant baseline imbalance in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores between groups (5.0 vs. 6.0, <i>p</i> = 0.036). This difference, favoring the SGLT2 inhibitor group at baseline, may partially explain the magnitude of improvement observed. While within-group analyses were performed, regression models should have included baseline PSQI as a covariate to mitigate this confounding [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Second, the multivariate logistic regression did not adjust for several potential confounders that could influence patient-reported outcomes, including changes in diuretic dosing, concurrent initiation of other guideline-directed medical therapies, and intercurrent hospitalizations. These variables are known to impact congestion, sleep, and mood in heart failure [<span>3, 4</span>].</p><p>Third, the subgroup analyses by ejection fraction status are based on small sample sizes, limiting statistical power and precision. Without reporting interaction <i>p</i>-values, the assertion of consistent benefit across EF strata is premature [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Fourth, multiple SF-36 domains and other secondary outcomes were tested without correction for multiplicity. In this setting, the risk of false-positive findings is high, particularly in small observational cohorts [<span>6</span>].</p><p>Lastly, the study's observational, single-center design precludes definitive causal inference, yet several statements in the discussion imply a treatment effect. This language should be tempered to reflect association rather than causation [<span>7</span>].</p><p>Given the increasing integration of SGLT2 inhibitors into heart failure care, it is critical that conclusions about novel patient-reported benefits be supported by rigorous methodology. Randomized controlled trials incorporating objective sleep measures (e.g., polysomnography) and adequate adjustment for confounding are needed to validate these intriguing findings.</p><p>Use of AI for paraphrasing and in analyzing the statistical model used in the study.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70203","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Cardiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1