首页 > 最新文献

The Korean Society of Calligraphy最新文献

英文 中文
A Study on the Calligraphy Spirit of Palha in 『Pilgam』 《朝拜》中帕哈的书法精神研究
Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.2
Jiyoung Jeong
This paper examines Pal Ha's calligraphy theory and calligraphic spirit as portrayed in his work featured in 『Pilgam』. I would like to replace the conclusion by synthesizing what was discussed in the main body. First of all, as a professional calligrapher who worked in the Daegu calligraphy circle, he learned calligraphy from Changam in his youth, and was also an early teacher of Seokjae Seo Byeong-oh who is the renovation of Daegu literary painting, and is considered the origin of Daegu calligraphy in the 20th century. Pilgam was compiled to convey to his son Gyeong-soon, and is a rare professional calligraphy theory book in the late Joseon Dynasty. It comprehensively covers Palha’s calligraphic theories from basic techniques of one-stroke technique and Eight Principles of Yong (永字八法) to writing method, brushstroke method, letter closing method, ink usage, theory on copying practice with classics, theory on calligraphic font and the like along with appendices of Seobeopwonin (書琺原因), Jegapumpyeong (諸家品評, criticism on calligraphic masters) and his copying practice of 「Jinchocheonmun (眞草千文)」. The theory on calligraphic technique on 『Pilgam』 classified and examined one-stroke technique, Eight Principles of Yong, writing method, brushstroke method and letter closing method and the gist is as follows. The one-stroke technique and Eight Principles of Yong facilitated studying calligraphy (學書) with illustrations and metaphorical explanations with natural objects. The writing method stressed control of five fingers (指實), space given to the palm (掌虛), lifting the elbow (縣腕) and standing of a brush (管直). The brushstroke method placed much value on hiding of brush tip (藏鋒) and the principles of ‘movement inevitably followed by halt (無垂不縮)’ and ‘coordination of the top and the bottom (承上接下).’ The letter closing method put emphasis on harmony of sparseness and denseness (疏密) and untrimmedness (參差). The calligraphic view on 『Pilgam』 classified and examined theory on copying practice with classics, theory on calligraphic font and theory on criticism and the gist is as follows. The copying practice with classics emphasized academic attitude of learning strong points and supplementing weak points (取長補短) along with notions that one should establish a system for Lishu by using Zhuanshu; that for Xingshu by using Kaishu and; that for Caoshu through Caoshu written by Zhangzhi. As demonstrated above, 『Pilgam』 pursued the theory on calligraphic technique based on classical theories for learning calligraphy including one-stroke technique, Eight Principles of Yong and writing method and the calligraphic view of creating new by learning from the past (法古創新) and learning strong points and supplementing weak points (取長補短). Palha’s such calligraphic theory would be a proper guideline for calligraphic researchers as the basis for calligraphic study and creation.
本文考察了帕哈在《朝拜记》中所体现的书法理论和书法精神。我想以综合正文中讨论的内容来取代结论。首先,他是在大邱书法界工作的专业书法家,年轻时师从昌岩,是大邱文画的革新者徐炳五的早期老师,被认为是20世纪大邱书法界的鼻祖。《Pilgam》是为了传达给儿子庆顺而编纂的,是朝鲜后期罕见的专业书法理论书籍。它全面覆盖Palha一蹴而就的书法理论从基本技术技巧和八个原则勇(永字八法)写作方法,一笔方法,信关闭方法,墨水使用、复制理论实践与经典,书法字体等理论以及附录Seobeopwonin(書琺原因),Jegapumpyeong(諸家品評,批评书法大师)和他的复制的做法“Jinchocheonmun(眞草千文)”。《天路记》书法技法理论对一笔法、咏八法、写法、笔法、收法进行了分类和考察,其要点如下。一笔法和《庸八理》有助于学习书法,并附有插图和自然物体的隐喻解释。这种书写方法强调控制五指,给手掌留出空间,抬起肘部,站在毛笔上。笔法非常重视笔尖的隐蔽性,以及“动而不停”和“上下协调”的原则。收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人的收信人。“朝圣”书法观对仿经实践说、字体说、批评说进行了分类和考察,其要点如下。抄经则强调取长补短的学术态度,并主张用篆书建立立书体系;行术用开枢和;通过张之所写的《草书》为草书写的书。如上所述,“朝圣”追求的是书法技术理论,其基础是学习书法的经典理论,包括一笔法、八勇法和书写方法,以及学习过去创造新的书法观点,学习优点,补充缺点。帕哈的书法理论作为书法研究和创作的基础,对书法研究者具有一定的指导意义。
{"title":"A Study on the Calligraphy Spirit of Palha in 『Pilgam』","authors":"Jiyoung Jeong","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.2","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Pal Ha's calligraphy theory and calligraphic spirit as portrayed in his work featured in 『Pilgam』. I would like to replace the conclusion by synthesizing what was discussed in the main body. \u0000First of all, as a professional calligrapher who worked in the Daegu calligraphy circle, he learned calligraphy from Changam in his youth, and was also an early teacher of Seokjae Seo Byeong-oh who is the renovation of Daegu literary painting, and is considered the origin of Daegu calligraphy in the 20th century. \u0000Pilgam was compiled to convey to his son Gyeong-soon, and is a rare professional calligraphy theory book in the late Joseon Dynasty. It comprehensively covers Palha’s calligraphic theories from basic techniques of one-stroke technique and Eight Principles of Yong (永字八法) to writing method, brushstroke method, letter closing method, ink usage, theory on copying practice with classics, theory on calligraphic font and the like along with appendices of Seobeopwonin (書琺原因), Jegapumpyeong (諸家品評, criticism on calligraphic masters) and his copying practice of 「Jinchocheonmun (眞草千文)」. \u0000The theory on calligraphic technique on 『Pilgam』 classified and examined one-stroke technique, Eight Principles of Yong, writing method, brushstroke method and letter closing method and the gist is as follows. The one-stroke technique and Eight Principles of Yong facilitated studying calligraphy (學書) with illustrations and metaphorical explanations with natural objects. The writing method stressed control of five fingers (指實), space given to the palm (掌虛), lifting the elbow (縣腕) and standing of a brush (管直). The brushstroke method placed much value on hiding of brush tip (藏鋒) and the principles of ‘movement inevitably followed by halt (無垂不縮)’ and ‘coordination of the top and the bottom (承上接下).’ The letter closing method put emphasis on harmony of sparseness and denseness (疏密) and untrimmedness (參差). \u0000The calligraphic view on 『Pilgam』 classified and examined theory on copying practice with classics, theory on calligraphic font and theory on criticism and the gist is as follows. The copying practice with classics emphasized academic attitude of learning strong points and supplementing weak points (取長補短) along with notions that one should establish a system for Lishu by using Zhuanshu; that for Xingshu by using Kaishu and; that for Caoshu through Caoshu written by Zhangzhi. \u0000As demonstrated above, 『Pilgam』 pursued the theory on calligraphic technique based on classical theories for learning calligraphy including one-stroke technique, Eight Principles of Yong and writing method and the calligraphic view of creating new by learning from the past (法古創新) and learning strong points and supplementing weak points (取長補短). Palha’s such calligraphic theory would be a proper guideline for calligraphic researchers as the basis for calligraphic study and creation.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"44 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131356706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pros and Cons and Reflections on the Construction of Contemporary Calligraphy Aesthetics from the Perspective of Ancient Scholars 古代文人视野下当代书法美学建构的利弊与思考
Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.9
Zheng Chang, H. Kou
As the main representatives of calligraphy aesthetic activities, ancient Chinese intellectuals used Chinese characters as the medium to promote the continuous development of this unique oriental aesthetic characteristic of calligraphy. Ancient intellectuals understood the dialectical thinking of philosophy in the Qin Dynasty, and the literary and artistic thoughts in many famous works and the literary theories of the past dynasties even indirectly or directly shaped their aesthetic concepts of calligraphy. The philosophical concepts and philosophical categories in ancient Chinese classics have played a leading role in the construction of contemporary Chinese calligraphy aesthetics. It can be said that the aesthetics of ancient intellectuals is the original category of all art, and current calligraphy scholars should fully absorb and learn from it. Therefore, the construction of the discipline system of Chinese calligraphy aesthetics is particularly important for learning from ancient calligraphy aesthetics. The current aesthetics of calligraphy is different from the powerful scientific cognition system in the West. There are still many problems in the construction of aesthetics of Chinese calligraphy. The accurate construction of aesthetics of calligraphy requires not only a clear understanding, but also a deep understanding of ancient Chinese knowledge systems and literati traditions. Developed under the aesthetic consideration of calligraphy, and based on the integrated humanistic knowledge system, this is the only way to truly establish the current calligraphy aesthetics construction towards discipline and theory. In recent years, Chinese calligraphy scholars tend to interpret Chinese calligraphy art within the framework of Western culture, and are relatively lacking in understanding the depth of aesthetic concepts and artistic conception of Qin Dynasty philosophy, lacking in depth and breadth. This paper focuses on the construction of the discipline of Chinese calligraphy aesthetics, and analyzes the “gain and loss” of the academic tendency of Chinese calligraphy aesthetics, which is of great significance. 中国古代士人作为书法审美活动的主体,他们以汉字为媒介,推动着这一独具东方美学特色的书法艺术不断向前发展。古代士人深谙先秦哲学的辩证思维,诸思想名著中的文艺思想和历代文论更是间接或直接的塑造了他们的书法审美观念。中国古代先秦典籍中的哲学观念和哲学范畴更是对当下中国书法美学的建构起到了高屋建瓴的思想引领,可以说先秦士人审美观是一切艺术的元范畴,当下的书法学者应当充分的吸收、借鉴。因此,中国书法美学的学科体系建构对于借鉴古代士人传统下的书法审美观尤为重要。当下书法美学不同于西方强大的科学认知体系,中国书法美学建构仍存在着诸多问题,对当下书法美学的准确建构不仅要有清醒的认知,而且必须在深入了解中国古代知识系统和士人传统的审美观照下开展,并以浑融一体的人文知识系统为主,这才是真正确立当下书法美学建构走向学理化的必经之路。近年来,中国的书法学者倾向于以西方学问的框架诠释中国书法艺术,对于领悟先秦哲学的审美观念深度和意境内涵相对匮乏,缺少深度和广度。本文围绕中国书法美学学科的建设问题,充分分析了中国书法美学学术性倾向的“得失”,具有重要意义。
中国古代知识分子作为书法审美活动的主要代表,以汉字为媒介,推动书法这一独特的东方审美特征不断发展。古代知识分子懂得秦代哲学的辩证思维,许多名著中的文艺思想和历代文论甚至间接或直接地塑造了他们的书法审美观念。中国古代经典中的哲学概念和哲学范畴对当代中国书法美学的建构起了主导作用。可以说,古代知识分子的审美是一切艺术的本源范畴,当代书法学者应充分吸收和借鉴。因此,中国书法美学学科体系的建设对于学习古代书法美学尤为重要。当前的书法美学不同于西方强大的科学认知体系。中国书法美学建设中还存在许多问题。书法美学的准确建构不仅需要清晰的认识,还需要对中国古代知识体系和文人传统有深刻的理解。这是在书法的审美考量下,以完整的人文知识体系为基础发展起来的,是当前书法美学建设真正走向学科和理论的必由之路。近年来,中国书法学者倾向于在西方文化的框架内解读中国书法艺术,对秦代哲学的审美观念和意境深度的理解相对缺乏,缺乏深度和广度。本文着眼于中国书法美学学科的建设,分析中国书法美学学术倾向的“得失”,具有重要意义。中国古代士人作为书法审美活动的主体,他们以汉字为媒介,推动着这一独具东方美学特色的书法艺术不断向前发展。古代士人深谙先秦哲学的辩证思维,诸思想名著中的文艺思想和历代文论更是间接或直接的塑造了他们的书法审美观念。中国古代先秦典籍中的哲学观念和哲学范畴更是对当下中国书法美学的建构起到了高屋建瓴的思想引领,可以说先秦士人审美观是一切艺术的元范畴,当下的书法学者应当充分的吸收、借鉴。因此,中国书法美学的学科体系建构对于借鉴古代士人传统下的书法审美观尤为重要。当下书法美学不同于西方强大的科学认知体系,中国书法美学建构仍存在着诸多问题,对当下书法美学的准确建构不仅要有清醒的认知,而且必须在深入了解中国古代知识系统和士人传统的审美观照下开展,并以浑融一体的人文知识系统为主,这才是真正确立当下书法美学建构走向学理化的必经之路。近年来,中国的书法学者倾向于以西方学问的框架诠释中国书法艺术,对于领悟先秦哲学的审美观念深度和意境内涵相对匮乏,缺少深度和广度。本文围绕中国书法美学学科的建设问题,充分分析了中国书法美学学术性倾向的“得失”,具有重要意义。
{"title":"Pros and Cons and Reflections on the Construction of Contemporary Calligraphy Aesthetics from the Perspective of Ancient Scholars","authors":"Zheng Chang, H. Kou","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.9","url":null,"abstract":"As the main representatives of calligraphy aesthetic activities, ancient Chinese intellectuals used Chinese characters as the medium to promote the continuous development of this unique oriental aesthetic characteristic of calligraphy. Ancient intellectuals understood the dialectical thinking of philosophy in the Qin Dynasty, and the literary and artistic thoughts in many famous works and the literary theories of the past dynasties even indirectly or directly shaped their aesthetic concepts of calligraphy. The philosophical concepts and philosophical categories in ancient Chinese classics have played a leading role in the construction of contemporary Chinese calligraphy aesthetics. It can be said that the aesthetics of ancient intellectuals is the original category of all art, and current calligraphy scholars should fully absorb and learn from it. Therefore, the construction of the discipline system of Chinese calligraphy aesthetics is particularly important for learning from ancient calligraphy aesthetics. The current aesthetics of calligraphy is different from the powerful scientific cognition system in the West. There are still many problems in the construction of aesthetics of Chinese calligraphy. The accurate construction of aesthetics of calligraphy requires not only a clear understanding, but also a deep understanding of ancient Chinese knowledge systems and literati traditions. Developed under the aesthetic consideration of calligraphy, and based on the integrated humanistic knowledge system, this is the only way to truly establish the current calligraphy aesthetics construction towards discipline and theory. In recent years, Chinese calligraphy scholars tend to interpret Chinese calligraphy art within the framework of Western culture, and are relatively lacking in understanding the depth of aesthetic concepts and artistic conception of Qin Dynasty philosophy, lacking in depth and breadth. This paper focuses on the construction of the discipline of Chinese calligraphy aesthetics, and analyzes the “gain and loss” of the academic tendency of Chinese calligraphy aesthetics, which is of great significance. \u0000中国古代士人作为书法审美活动的主体,他们以汉字为媒介,推动着这一独具东方美学特色的书法艺术不断向前发展。古代士人深谙先秦哲学的辩证思维,诸思想名著中的文艺思想和历代文论更是间接或直接的塑造了他们的书法审美观念。中国古代先秦典籍中的哲学观念和哲学范畴更是对当下中国书法美学的建构起到了高屋建瓴的思想引领,可以说先秦士人审美观是一切艺术的元范畴,当下的书法学者应当充分的吸收、借鉴。因此,中国书法美学的学科体系建构对于借鉴古代士人传统下的书法审美观尤为重要。当下书法美学不同于西方强大的科学认知体系,中国书法美学建构仍存在着诸多问题,对当下书法美学的准确建构不仅要有清醒的认知,而且必须在深入了解中国古代知识系统和士人传统的审美观照下开展,并以浑融一体的人文知识系统为主,这才是真正确立当下书法美学建构走向学理化的必经之路。近年来,中国的书法学者倾向于以西方学问的框架诠释中国书法艺术,对于领悟先秦哲学的审美观念深度和意境内涵相对匮乏,缺少深度和广度。本文围绕中国书法美学学科的建设问题,充分分析了中国书法美学学术性倾向的“得失”,具有重要意义。","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122272961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study on the Status of Korean Calligraphy in Toegye Yi Hwang's Calligraphy Aesthetics 韩国书法在黄退溪书法美学中的地位研究
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.02
M. Jo
In the history of calligraphy in the Joseon Dynasty, the 16th century is meaningful in that there were various calligraphy styles besides Wang Xizhi’s calligraphy style and Zhaomengfu’s calligraphy style. Before and after Lee Hwang was alive, there were calligraphers such as Kim Gu, Seongsuchim, Hwang Gi-ro, Yang Sa-eon, and Han Ho. Each of them unfolds a variety of calligraphy styles based on their artistry, and from the perspective of calligraphy aesthetics, it is necessary to pay attention to Lee Hwang’s calligraphy aesthetics. This is because Lee Hwang understood calligraphy in the Joseon Dynasty in terms of ‘painting of the heart’ and ‘painting with calligraphy works’ based on the new Confucianism. Lee Hwang is not considered a famous calligrapher when discussing at a technical level. Lee Hwang is not considered a famous calligrapher when discussing at a technical level. The reason why Lee Hwang was established as a calligrapher is that he unfolded a world of calligraphy creation in which his knowledge and character were combined. Lee Hwang’s evaluation of calligraphy was based on ethics rather than art understood at the technical level. This tells us that Lee Hwang’s studies and art are one. The results of Lee Hwang’s calligraphy creation are evaluated as ‘stiff, robust, upright, and solemn’. Applying this to the philosophy raised by Lee Hwang, the idea that ‘when reason works, energy follows’ is a result of art. In addition, it is the result of Lee Hwang’s philosophy of ‘catch respect’. As such, Lee Hwang’s perception of art that all art should be art on which reason worked emphasizes the calligraphy trend developed by Wangxizi and others. In addition, it develops as a reason for criticizing Zhaomengfu and Zhangbi. The key to Lee Hwang’s evaluation of Zhaomengfu and Zhangbi was that they did not understand the reason properly and worked on art creation. Both Zhaomengfu and Zhangbi. belong to the failure to properly operate the calligraphic meaning of ‘the right law of the heart’ and ‘respect’ in New Confucianism. In addition, it belongs to ignoring the right law and the old law and operating it arbitrarily. If the Korean calligraphy history is identified at an aesthetic level, the calligraphy aesthetics raised at the level of ‘catch respect’ and ‘picture of the mind’ presented a typical example of calligraphy aesthetics that Confucian scholars of the Joseon Dynasty later sought. In this regard, there is a historical significance in Korean calligraphy.
历史上的书法在李氏王朝,16世纪是有意义的,有各种书法风格除了王羲之的书法风格和Zhaomengfu的书法风格。在李黄生前前后,出现了金九、成水谦、黄基鲁、梁思彦、韩浩等书法家。他们每个人都根据自己的艺术性展开了多种书法风格,从书法美学的角度来看,有必要关注李黄的书法美学。这是因为李黄对朝鲜书法的理解是以新儒学为基础的“心画”和“用书法画”。从技术层面来看,李滉并不是著名的书法家。从技术层面来看,李滉并不是著名的书法家。李黄之所以成为书法家,是因为他展现了自己的知识和性格相结合的书法创作世界。李黄对书法的评价是基于伦理,而不是技术层面的艺术。这告诉我们,李黄的学习和艺术是一体的。李黄的书法创作结果被评价为“僵硬、健壮、挺拔、庄严”。把这一点应用到李黄提出的哲学中,“当理性起作用时,能量就会随之而来”的想法是艺术的结果。此外,这也是李黄“抓住尊重”哲学的结果。因此,李黄的“一切艺术都应该是理性作用下的艺术”的艺术观,强调了王羲之等人所发展的书法思潮。此外,它还发展成为批判昭梦赋和章笔的理由。李黄对昭梦甫和张弼的评价,关键在于他们没有正确认识原因,从事艺术创作。昭蒙府和张壁都有。属于对新儒家“心法”和“敬”的书法意义操作不当。另外,它属于无视正法和旧法,任意操作。如果从美学的角度来看待韩国的书法史,那么在“抓尊”和“画心”的层面上提出的书法美学,就是后来朝鲜儒家学者所追求的书法美学的典型。在这方面,韩国书法具有历史意义。
{"title":"A Study on the Status of Korean Calligraphy in Toegye Yi Hwang's Calligraphy Aesthetics","authors":"M. Jo","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.02","url":null,"abstract":"In the history of calligraphy in the Joseon Dynasty, the 16th century is meaningful in that there were various calligraphy styles besides Wang Xizhi’s calligraphy style and Zhaomengfu’s calligraphy style. Before and after Lee Hwang was alive, there were calligraphers such as Kim Gu, Seongsuchim, Hwang Gi-ro, Yang Sa-eon, and Han Ho. Each of them unfolds a variety of calligraphy styles based on their artistry, and from the perspective of calligraphy aesthetics, it is necessary to pay attention to Lee Hwang’s calligraphy aesthetics. This is because Lee Hwang understood calligraphy in the Joseon Dynasty in terms of ‘painting of the heart’ and ‘painting with calligraphy works’ based on the new Confucianism. Lee Hwang is not considered a famous calligrapher when discussing at a technical level. Lee Hwang is not considered a famous calligrapher when discussing at a technical level. The reason why Lee Hwang was established as a calligrapher is that he unfolded a world of calligraphy creation in which his knowledge and character were combined. Lee Hwang’s evaluation of calligraphy was based on ethics rather than art understood at the technical level. This tells us that Lee Hwang’s studies and art are one. The results of Lee Hwang’s calligraphy creation are evaluated as ‘stiff, robust, upright, and solemn’. Applying this to the philosophy raised by Lee Hwang, the idea that ‘when reason works, energy follows’ is a result of art. In addition, it is the result of Lee Hwang’s philosophy of ‘catch respect’. As such, Lee Hwang’s perception of art that all art should be art on which reason worked emphasizes the calligraphy trend developed by Wangxizi and others. In addition, it develops as a reason for criticizing Zhaomengfu and Zhangbi. The key to Lee Hwang’s evaluation of Zhaomengfu and Zhangbi was that they did not understand the reason properly and worked on art creation. Both Zhaomengfu and Zhangbi. belong to the failure to properly operate the calligraphic meaning of ‘the right law of the heart’ and ‘respect’ in New Confucianism. In addition, it belongs to ignoring the right law and the old law and operating it arbitrarily. If the Korean calligraphy history is identified at an aesthetic level, the calligraphy aesthetics raised at the level of ‘catch respect’ and ‘picture of the mind’ presented a typical example of calligraphy aesthetics that Confucian scholars of the Joseon Dynasty later sought. In this regard, there is a historical significance in Korean calligraphy.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126417753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An investigation of Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought from the perspective of Confucianism 从儒家思想考察蔡祥的书法思想
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.08
Xiao-yu Wang
During the Song Dynasty in which Cai Xiang lived, Confucian ideology formed a powerful force in both public and private life. His calligraphy thought was also deeply influenced by this ancient philosophy, ethics and educational concept. Taking Confucianism as the starting point, this paper attempts to examine the influence of Confucianism on Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought and calligraphy creation. In the study of Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought, if it is only discussed from the simple aspect of calligraphy, it will inevitably be incomplete. Calligraphy is a unique art gradually conceived and developed in the soil of traditional culture. As a scholar-bureaucrat deeply influenced by Confucianism, Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought must have a profound and intricate relationship with Confucian cultural thought. From the perspective of Confucianism, to examine Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought and to seek the correlation among them can make Cai Xiang's image of a literati calligrapher more three-dimensional and comprehensive.In the thesis, relying on the evaluation of Cai Xiang's calligraphy by contemporaries and later generations, it illustrates Cai Xiang's position in the history of calligraphy and the rationality of his calligraphy thought from the side. Relying on Cai Xiang's own calligraphy theory, we then examine the meaning and value contained in his calligraphy thought. The paper mainly involves several parts: First of all, in the context of the sluggish calligraphy circle in the early Song Dynasty, Cai Xiang's advocacy of "methodology" and "ancient meaning". It makes the development of calligraphy in the early Song Dynasty to undertake the main line of Jin and Tang Dynasties again and return to Daotong. Secondly, while attaching importance to the value of "methods" in calligraphy, Cai Xiang also emphasized the pursuit of "charm" and "spirit" in calligraphy works. Personality spirit and artistic spirit are always complementary and unified in traditional aesthetics. The pursuit of "Charm" and "Spirit" is also a manifestation of the pursuit of the harmonious and unified realm of human and artistic environment. Thirdly, the inheritance and innovation of calligraphy under the thought of "Zhizhonghe". In his calligraphy theory, Cai Xiang showed his traditional Confucian mentality of "Zongyong" aesthetics, and at the same time, he highly praised the ideal realm of the beauty of neutrality in Wei and Jin calligraphy. Cai Xiang's grasp of the common laws of different calligraphic styles is also the embodiment of the Confucian "neutralization" thought in his creative practice. Cai Xiang completes his own personality cultivation in the seemingly contradictory but complete and unified calligraphy thought and creative practice. It is also the "unbiased" style of his calligraphy that established his key position in the calligraphy circle of the mid-Northern Song Dynasty. 蔡襄所生活的宋朝时期,儒家意识形态在公共和私人生活领域形成一股强大力量,其书学思想也深受这种古代哲学伦理和教化观念观的影响. 本文以儒家思想作为切入点,试图考察儒学对于蔡襄书学
在蔡祥生活的宋朝,儒家思想在公共和私人生活中都形成了一股强大的力量。他的书法思想也深受这种古老的哲学、伦理和教育观念的影响。本文试图以儒家思想为切入点,考察儒家思想对蔡湘书法思想和书法创作的影响。在对蔡湘书法思想的研究中,如果仅仅从书法的简单方面进行探讨,难免会有不完整的地方。书法是在传统文化土壤中逐渐孕育和发展起来的一门独特的艺术。作为深受儒家思想影响的士大夫,蔡祥的书法思想必然与儒家文化思想有着深刻而错综复杂的关系。从儒学的角度审视蔡祥的书法思想,寻求二者之间的联系,可以使蔡祥的文人书法家形象更加立体和全面。本文以当代及后世对蔡祥书法的评价为依托,从侧面说明蔡祥在书法史上的地位及其书法思想的合理性。然后,我们从蔡湘本人的书法理论出发,考察其书法思想所蕴含的意义和价值。本文主要涉及几个部分:首先,在宋初书法界低迷的大背景下,蔡祥所倡导的“方法论”和“古意”。它使宋初书法的发展重新走上金唐的主线,回归到道统。其次,蔡翔在重视书法“法”价值的同时,也强调书法作品对“韵”、“灵”的追求。在传统美学中,人格精神与艺术精神始终是相辅相成、统一统一的。对“神韵”和“精神”的追求,也是对人与艺术环境和谐统一境界追求的表现。三是“知中和”思想下书法的传承与创新。在其书法理论中,蔡湘既表现了传统儒家的“宗雍”美学思想,又高度推崇魏晋书法中立性美的理想境界。蔡翔对不同书法风格共性规律的把握,也是儒家“中和”思想在其创作实践中的体现。蔡翔在看似矛盾但又完整统一的书法思想和创作实践中完成了自己的人格修养。也正是这种“不偏不倚”的书法风格,奠定了他在北宋中期书法界的关键地位。蔡襄所生活的宋朝时期,儒家意识形态在公共和私人生活领域形成一股强大力量,其书学思想也深受这种古代哲学伦理和教化观念观的影响. 本文以儒家思想作为切入点,试图考察儒学对于蔡襄书学思想和书法创作的影响. 在对于蔡襄书学思想的研究中,若仅仅只是从单纯的书法方面去论述,难免会不够完善. 书法是在传统文化的土壤中逐渐孕育和发展出来的独特艺术,而蔡襄作为深受儒家思想影响的士大夫,其书学思想必然与儒家文化思想有着深刻而错综复杂的关系. 而从儒学的视角出发去考察蔡襄的书学思想,并寻求其中的相关性,则能使蔡襄的文人书家形象更加立体而全面的呈现出来. 论文中以时人和后人对蔡襄书法的品评为依托,说明了蔡襄在书法史的地位,以及从侧面佐证了其书学思想的合理性. 以蔡襄本人的书法理论为依托,进而考察其书学思想中所蕴含的意义和价值. 【中文译文
{"title":"An investigation of Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought from the perspective of Confucianism","authors":"Xiao-yu Wang","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.08","url":null,"abstract":"During the Song Dynasty in which Cai Xiang lived, Confucian ideology formed a powerful force in both public and private life. His calligraphy thought was also deeply influenced by this ancient philosophy, ethics and educational concept. Taking Confucianism as the starting point, this paper attempts to examine the influence of Confucianism on Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought and calligraphy creation. In the study of Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought, if it is only discussed from the simple aspect of calligraphy, it will inevitably be incomplete. Calligraphy is a unique art gradually conceived and developed in the soil of traditional culture. As a scholar-bureaucrat deeply influenced by Confucianism, Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought must have a profound and intricate relationship with Confucian cultural thought. From the perspective of Confucianism, to examine Cai Xiang's calligraphy thought and to seek the correlation among them can make Cai Xiang's image of a literati calligrapher more three-dimensional and comprehensive.In the thesis, relying on the evaluation of Cai Xiang's calligraphy by contemporaries and later generations, it illustrates Cai Xiang's position in the history of calligraphy and the rationality of his calligraphy thought from the side. Relying on Cai Xiang's own calligraphy theory, we then examine the meaning and value contained in his calligraphy thought. The paper mainly involves several parts: First of all, in the context of the sluggish calligraphy circle in the early Song Dynasty, Cai Xiang's advocacy of \"methodology\" and \"ancient meaning\". It makes the development of calligraphy in the early Song Dynasty to undertake the main line of Jin and Tang Dynasties again and return to Daotong. Secondly, while attaching importance to the value of \"methods\" in calligraphy, Cai Xiang also emphasized the pursuit of \"charm\" and \"spirit\" in calligraphy works. Personality spirit and artistic spirit are always complementary and unified in traditional aesthetics. The pursuit of \"Charm\" and \"Spirit\" is also a manifestation of the pursuit of the harmonious and unified realm of human and artistic environment. Thirdly, the inheritance and innovation of calligraphy under the thought of \"Zhizhonghe\". In his calligraphy theory, Cai Xiang showed his traditional Confucian mentality of \"Zongyong\" aesthetics, and at the same time, he highly praised the ideal realm of the beauty of neutrality in Wei and Jin calligraphy. Cai Xiang's grasp of the common laws of different calligraphic styles is also the embodiment of the Confucian \"neutralization\" thought in his creative practice. Cai Xiang completes his own personality cultivation in the seemingly contradictory but complete and unified calligraphy thought and creative practice. It is also the \"unbiased\" style of his calligraphy that established his key position in the calligraphy circle of the mid-Northern Song Dynasty. \u0000蔡襄所生活的宋朝时期,儒家意识形态在公共和私人生活领域形成一股强大力量,其书学思想也深受这种古代哲学伦理和教化观念观的影响. 本文以儒家思想作为切入点,试图考察儒学对于蔡襄书学","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126958508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study on the Art Strategy of Wenda Gu 顾文达的艺术策略研究
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.09
H. Sur
The purpose of this research is to find out what strategies Chinese artist Wenda Gu (1955~) used to build awareness in the international art world and China. In the early 1980s, the trend of modern Western philosophy and modern art flowed into China following the wave of China's reform and opening up. In addition, global interest in Chinese contemporary art is increasing. Amid this trend, the 85 New Wave, which called for the modernization of Chinese art, served as a turning point in history as a major event that revealed its presence in the global art world. In this study, Wenda Gu, a leading Chinese avant-garde writer, examined the significance of the 85 New Wave through analysis of his work as a person who participated in the 85 New Wave. The 85 New Wave is a kind of cultural movement in which young artists, including Wenda Gu, try to reform Chinese society and art through art, and this completely changed the trend of modern Chinese art. In order to investigate Wenda Gu art strategy, he first visualized China's turbulent political and economic situation, and then went to the U.S. to grasp the characteristics of the expansion of the art world and internationalization factors that enabled artists to succeed. It can be seen that he incorporated elements of traditional Chinese culture into his works and actively utilized elements of literati culture in his works. This study is meaningful because it aims to present another perspective on his work based on his attitude change using traditional Chinese cultural elements depending on his position in China and international art circles.
本研究旨在探讨中国艺术家顾文达(1955~)在国际艺术界和中国艺术界建立意识的策略。20世纪80年代初,随着中国改革开放的浪潮,西方现代哲学和现代艺术思潮流入中国。此外,全球对中国当代艺术的兴趣也在增加。在这一趋势中,要求中国艺术现代化的“85新浪潮”作为显示其在全球艺术界存在的重大事件,成为历史的转折点。在本研究中,中国先锋作家顾文达作为85新浪潮的参与者,通过对其作品的分析来审视85新浪潮的意义。85新浪潮是包括顾文达在内的年轻艺术家试图通过艺术改造中国社会和艺术的一种文化运动,这彻底改变了中国现代艺术的走向。为了考察顾文达的艺术策略,他首先将中国动荡的政治和经济形势可视化,然后前往美国,把握艺术界扩张的特点和使艺术家成功的国际化因素。可以看出,他在作品中融入了中国传统文化的元素,并积极运用了文人文化的元素。这个研究是有意义的,因为它旨在根据他在中国和国际艺术界的地位,以中国传统文化元素的态度变化为基础,展示他的作品的另一个视角。
{"title":"A Study on the Art Strategy of Wenda Gu","authors":"H. Sur","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.09","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to find out what strategies Chinese artist Wenda Gu (1955~) used to build awareness in the international art world and China. In the early 1980s, the trend of modern Western philosophy and modern art flowed into China following the wave of China's reform and opening up. In addition, global interest in Chinese contemporary art is increasing. Amid this trend, the 85 New Wave, which called for the modernization of Chinese art, served as a turning point in history as a major event that revealed its presence in the global art world. \u0000In this study, Wenda Gu, a leading Chinese avant-garde writer, examined the significance of the 85 New Wave through analysis of his work as a person who participated in the 85 New Wave. The 85 New Wave is a kind of cultural movement in which young artists, including Wenda Gu, try to reform Chinese society and art through art, and this completely changed the trend of modern Chinese art. \u0000In order to investigate Wenda Gu art strategy, he first visualized China's turbulent political and economic situation, and then went to the U.S. to grasp the characteristics of the expansion of the art world and internationalization factors that enabled artists to succeed. It can be seen that he incorporated elements of traditional Chinese culture into his works and actively utilized elements of literati culture in his works. \u0000This study is meaningful because it aims to present another perspective on his work based on his attitude change using traditional Chinese cultural elements depending on his position in China and international art circles.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123486181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study of the Background in 〈Lady Seol’s Kwonsonmun(薛氏夫人勸善文)〉 A Study of the Background in 〈Lady Seol’s Kwonsonmun(薛氏夫人勸善文)〉
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.01
Dae-Won Kim
"The Precept for Human Rights of the Seol Clan" by Sun Chang-seol (1429-1508), a government official, is the oldest promotion of virtue text of Joseon left by an individual, and is very meaningful. Soon Chang-seol, a government official, was the first female writer, painter, and calligrapher in Joseon dinasity, 75 years before Sin Saimdang was born. This promotion of virtue text is a valuable artifact of Mrs. Seol's achievements in calligraphy and painting, as well as a measurement and standard of Buddhist culture at that time. Since Joseon was a country where Confucianism was established, officials in the Joseon Dynasty, which was centered on the “godfather of Shinheungsa” criticized Buddhism beyond the criticism of Buddhism by Buddhist Buddhism. However, from “King Taejo”, most of the royal family, including the king were in a position to prevent the abolition of the Buddhist community which caused social problems rather than the policy of deterrence. In particular, during the reign of King Seongjong from King Sejong, where the government, Soon Chang-seol lived, it was friendly to Buddhism, including publishing copies of Buddhist texts such as "Seokbosangjeol" and "Wolincheon Gangjigok." In particular, King Sejo claimed to be a Buddhist disciple and built the “Odaesan Sangwonsa Temple Jungchangwon Gate”, and circulated it to the central government and local officials to raise funds for the reconstruction of the “Sangwonsa Temple”. With this extensive circulation to the "Odaesan Sangwonsa Temple" became a sample of promotion of virtue text which was later produced. And 17 years after this, the "Seol Clan's Human Rights Proposition" is based on the style of “Jo Maengbu” which was popular at the time, and the style of the border line, line, and seal which according to the status of the upper and lower ranks. However, the "Seolsibu Human Rights Proposition" has its own special features, which provide a preview of the temple with its unique narrative style and incredible writing and the first “Cheongnoksan Painting” of the Joseon Dynasty.
宣昌雪(1429 ~ 1508年)的《薛氏人权训诫》是朝鲜最早的由个人留下的德性训诫书,非常有意义。在申世任堂诞生75年前,政府官员淳昌雪是朝鲜王朝第一位女性作家、画家、书法家。此次德文的推广,是雪夫人书画成就的珍贵神器,也是衡量当时佛教文化的尺度和标准。因为朝鲜是儒教的发源地,所以以“新兴寺教父”为中心的朝鲜王朝的官员们对佛教的批判超越了佛教对佛教的批判。然而,从《太祖王》开始,包括国王在内的大多数皇室成员都处于防止废除佛教社团造成社会问题的立场上,而不是采取威慑政策。特别是在顺昌雪政府所在的世宗大王成宗时期,对佛教非常友好,出版了《石宝相律》、《月仁江志》等佛教典籍。特别是,世祖王自称为佛教弟子,建造了“五大山尚院寺正昌院门”,并向中央政府和地方官员散发,为重建“尚院寺”筹集资金。随着这种广泛的流传,《五大山尚原寺》成为后来产生的一种宣扬美德的典籍。17年后的《薛氏人权主张》以当时流行的《赵孟部》和根据上下阶层的地位划分的边界线、线条、印章等为基础。但是,《雪府人权主张》有其独特的叙述风格和令人难以置信的文字,以及朝鲜时代的第一幅“清绿山画”,这是对清绿寺的预览。
{"title":"A Study of the Background in 〈Lady Seol’s Kwonsonmun(薛氏夫人勸善文)〉","authors":"Dae-Won Kim","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.01","url":null,"abstract":"\"The Precept for Human Rights of the Seol Clan\" by Sun Chang-seol (1429-1508), a government official, is the oldest promotion of virtue text of Joseon left by an individual, and is very meaningful. Soon Chang-seol, a government official, was the first female writer, painter, and calligrapher in Joseon dinasity, 75 years before Sin Saimdang was born. This promotion of virtue text is a valuable artifact of Mrs. Seol's achievements in calligraphy and painting, as well as a measurement and standard of Buddhist culture at that time. \u0000Since Joseon was a country where Confucianism was established, officials in the Joseon Dynasty, which was centered on the “godfather of Shinheungsa” criticized Buddhism beyond the criticism of Buddhism by Buddhist Buddhism. However, from “King Taejo”, most of the royal family, including the king were in a position to prevent the abolition of the Buddhist community which caused social problems rather than the policy of deterrence. \u0000In particular, during the reign of King Seongjong from King Sejong, where the government, Soon Chang-seol lived, it was friendly to Buddhism, including publishing copies of Buddhist texts such as \"Seokbosangjeol\" and \"Wolincheon Gangjigok.\" In particular, King Sejo claimed to be a Buddhist disciple and built the “Odaesan Sangwonsa Temple Jungchangwon Gate”, and circulated it to the central government and local officials to raise funds for the reconstruction of the “Sangwonsa Temple”. \u0000With this extensive circulation to the \"Odaesan Sangwonsa Temple\" became a sample of promotion of virtue text which was later produced. And 17 years after this, the \"Seol Clan's Human Rights Proposition\" is based on the style of “Jo Maengbu” which was popular at the time, and the style of the border line, line, and seal which according to the status of the upper and lower ranks. However, the \"Seolsibu Human Rights Proposition\" has its own special features, which provide a preview of the temple with its unique narrative style and incredible writing and the first “Cheongnoksan Painting” of the Joseon Dynasty.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121243046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study on the Written Writers of Independent Literature 独立文学写作者研究
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.06
S. Yoo, In-geun Sung
There are two theories about the lyricist of A framed picture written on the south and north sides of Independence Gate. It was written by Lee Wan-yong(1858-1926), who was patriotic but degenerated into a traitor, and by Dongnong Kim Ga-jin(1846-1922), who devoted himself to modernization of Joseon and campaigned for independence until he turned his back on the world. Independence Gate is a national monument modeled after the Arc de Triomphe in Paris in the form of a 14.2m high and 11.48m wide stone gate that greeted the envoys of Cheong since the Independence Association advocated the construction of Independence Gate in 1896. The south side of Independence Gate is engraved in Korean, and The north side is engraved with three letters of Independence Gate in Chinese characters. As both Lee Wan-yong and Kim Ga-jin were known as the best handwritings of the time, it is highly likely that they wrote the compilation of the Independence Gate. In addition, Lee Wan-yong was the chairman of the Independent Association and the foreign minister of the Joseon government at the time of the establishment of the Independent Gate, and Kim Ga-jin was also a member of the Independent Association and a high-ranking official of Joseon. Therefore, it is considered reasonable to interpret the answer to who wrote the compilation of the independent text in a calligraphy manner through the genuine enemies left by Lee Wan-yong and Kim Ga-jin. Therefore, this paper analyzes the calligraphy context of Lee Wan-yong and Kim Ga-jin and the font characteristics of similar handwriting left by them based on two different theories about independent writers.
关于写在独立门南北两侧的装裱画的作词人,有两种说法。它是由爱国但堕落为卖国贼的李完庸(1858 ~ 1926年)和东农金家镇(1846 ~ 1922年)撰写的,他致力于朝鲜的近代化和独立运动,直到离开世界。独立门是自1896年独立会主张建造独立门以来,以法国巴黎凯旋门为蓝本,建造高14.2米、宽11.48米的石门迎接郑国清特使的国家纪念物。南侧刻有韩文,北侧刻有“独立门”三个汉字。李完庸和金家镇都被认为是当时笔迹最好的人,所以很有可能是他们写的《独立门汇编》。此外,独立门成立时,李完镕是独立会会长兼朝鲜政府外相,金家镇也是独立会会员兼朝鲜高层官员。因此,可以通过李完庸和金家镇留下的真正的敌人,以书法的方式解释谁编写了独立文本的答案。因此,本文从两种不同的独立写作者理论出发,分析李完庸和金家镇的书法语境以及他们留下的相似笔迹的字体特征。
{"title":"A Study on the Written Writers of Independent Literature","authors":"S. Yoo, In-geun Sung","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.06","url":null,"abstract":"There are two theories about the lyricist of A framed picture written on the south and north sides of Independence Gate. It was written by Lee Wan-yong(1858-1926), who was patriotic but degenerated into a traitor, and by Dongnong Kim Ga-jin(1846-1922), who devoted himself to modernization of Joseon and campaigned for independence until he turned his back on the world. Independence Gate is a national monument modeled after the Arc de Triomphe in Paris in the form of a 14.2m high and 11.48m wide stone gate that greeted the envoys of Cheong since the Independence Association advocated the construction of Independence Gate in 1896. The south side of Independence Gate is engraved in Korean, and The north side is engraved with three letters of Independence Gate in Chinese characters. \u0000As both Lee Wan-yong and Kim Ga-jin were known as the best handwritings of the time, it is highly likely that they wrote the compilation of the Independence Gate. In addition, Lee Wan-yong was the chairman of the Independent Association and the foreign minister of the Joseon government at the time of the establishment of the Independent Gate, and Kim Ga-jin was also a member of the Independent Association and a high-ranking official of Joseon. Therefore, it is considered reasonable to interpret the answer to who wrote the compilation of the independent text in a calligraphy manner through the genuine enemies left by Lee Wan-yong and Kim Ga-jin. Therefore, this paper analyzes the calligraphy context of Lee Wan-yong and Kim Ga-jin and the font characteristics of similar handwriting left by them based on two different theories about independent writers.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114601578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study on the Hangeul Geumseokmun in the Joseon Dynasty 朝鲜时代的韩文金石门研究
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.05
Song Han
Among the golden stone gates of the Joseon Dynasty made in Korea, Lee Yun-tak Hangeul Monument in Seoul was produced in 1536, the Hangeul Tombstone in Inheung-gun Cemetery in Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do was produced in 1686, and Joryung 'Wildfire Dawn Sim in Mungyeong, Gyeongsangbuk-do, which is presumed to have been made during the reign of King Jeongjo'. There is a stone monument, the Hangeul Monument of Uigoksa Temple in Jinju, Gyeongnam, which has two theories of production date in 1796 and 1916, and the Geochang Hangeul Iron Monument, which was produced in 1879 and is the backside of the Bulmangbi by Kim Gye-jin of Geochang, Gyeongsangnam-do. These five inscriptions are from the 16th to 19th centuries, and are important cultural heritages that allow you to examine the history, society, culture, and art of the Joseon Dynasty in a situation where historical documents in Hangeul are rare. In the Joseon Dynasty, the font style of Hangeul Geumseokmun is similar to the popular font used in the 16th, 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, respectively, when Hangeul inscriptions appeared. In other words, various fonts of Haerye, Eonhae, and Minche can be found in the Hangeul Geumseokmun. Through this, the golden stone inscriptions of Hangeul in the Joseon Dynasty become an important historical material that cannot be missed in the history of Hangeul calligraphy, and at the same time have an important calligraphic value. In the Joseon Dynasty, Hangeul gold stone inscriptions have sufficient cultural value as historical materials with rarity and specificity only in their material and quantity. Through the contents of Geumseokmun, it was possible to know the language life of the Joseon Dynasty well, and in particular, it has an important historical value in terms of the Korean language through the vocabulary shown in the Hangeul sentences. Also, through the background and purpose of their construction, it can be seen that these inscriptions become an important medium to connect with the social image of the Joseon Dynasty.
在国内制作的朝鲜金石门中,1536年制作的首尔李允德韩文碑、1686年制作的京畿浦川市仁兴郡墓地韩文墓碑、推测是正祖时期制作的庆尚北道闻庆市的慈陵山火黎明碑等。其中,制作时间有1796年和1916年两种说法的庆南晋州市义高寺韩文碑和制作于1879年的庆南居昌市金桂珍的《不满碑》背面的“居昌韩文铁碑”是石碑。这5件碑文是16 ~ 19世纪的作品,是在韩文史料稀少的情况下,可以研究朝鲜时代的历史、社会、文化、艺术的重要文化遗产。在朝鲜时代,韩文金石文的字体与出现韩文的16世纪、17世纪、18世纪、19世纪使用的字体相似。也就是说,在韩文金石文中可以看到海礼、银海、民语等多种字体。由此,朝鲜时代的韩文金石碑文成为韩文书法史上不可错过的重要史料,同时也具有重要的书法价值。在朝鲜时代,韩文金石碑刻仅在材料和数量上具有稀缺性和特殊性,作为史料具有充分的文化价值。通过《金石文》的内容,可以很好地了解朝鲜时代的语言生活,特别是通过韩文句子中的词汇,具有重要的韩国语历史价值。此外,通过其建造的背景和目的,可以看出这些碑文成为连接朝鲜社会形象的重要媒介。
{"title":"A Study on the Hangeul Geumseokmun in the Joseon Dynasty","authors":"Song Han","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.05","url":null,"abstract":"Among the golden stone gates of the Joseon Dynasty made in Korea, Lee Yun-tak Hangeul Monument in Seoul was produced in 1536, the Hangeul Tombstone in Inheung-gun Cemetery in Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do was produced in 1686, and Joryung 'Wildfire Dawn Sim in Mungyeong, Gyeongsangbuk-do, which is presumed to have been made during the reign of King Jeongjo'. There is a stone monument, the Hangeul Monument of Uigoksa Temple in Jinju, Gyeongnam, which has two theories of production date in 1796 and 1916, and the Geochang Hangeul Iron Monument, which was produced in 1879 and is the backside of the Bulmangbi by Kim Gye-jin of Geochang, Gyeongsangnam-do. These five inscriptions are from the 16th to 19th centuries, and are important cultural heritages that allow you to examine the history, society, culture, and art of the Joseon Dynasty in a situation where historical documents in Hangeul are rare. \u0000In the Joseon Dynasty, the font style of Hangeul Geumseokmun is similar to the popular font used in the 16th, 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, respectively, when Hangeul inscriptions appeared. In other words, various fonts of Haerye, Eonhae, and Minche can be found in the Hangeul Geumseokmun. Through this, the golden stone inscriptions of Hangeul in the Joseon Dynasty become an important historical material that cannot be missed in the history of Hangeul calligraphy, and at the same time have an important calligraphic value. \u0000In the Joseon Dynasty, Hangeul gold stone inscriptions have sufficient cultural value as historical materials with rarity and specificity only in their material and quantity. Through the contents of Geumseokmun, it was possible to know the language life of the Joseon Dynasty well, and in particular, it has an important historical value in terms of the Korean language through the vocabulary shown in the Hangeul sentences. Also, through the background and purpose of their construction, it can be seen that these inscriptions become an important medium to connect with the social image of the Joseon Dynasty.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124678872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Study on Chojeong Park Jega’s View of Painting to Empty Mind and Cultivate Nature 朴济甲朝正的空心养性画观研究
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.04
Myungho Lim
Park Jega was a scholar and thinker active in the late 18th century of the Joseon Dynasty. Although he never presented a precise painting theory, he said that he has been a painting enthusiast since childhood and continued to enjoy painting even after he grew up. Thus, in this paper, I analyzed his view of the painting by investigating his preface, postscript, and inscribed poem of painting. I briefly summarized Park Jega's view of painting to empty the mind and cultivate nature as follows. First, I analyzed the aspect that he emphasized the form of spirit as an image beyond the image from the stance of focusing on the rhythm of spirit. As a result, Park Jega actively affirmed the value of calligraphy and painting by applying the theory that the boundary of poetry is mutually compatible with that of painting to the creation of calligraphy and painting. He embodied the natural painting will that exudes the spiritual taste of literati painting. Also, he realized the world of describing the thinking while faithfully possessing the formative beauty of resembling the form. Thus, he was faithful to the rhythm of spirit that expresses the image beyond the image. Second, I examined the fact that he created the vitality of the natural taste of nature in terms of the natural spirit. As a result, the emptiness to empty the mind is a premise that can achieve aesthetic communion with external objects and was also related to Park Jega’s open thinking. Since people already have preconceived notions, they should empty their minds before painting. Park Jega called that prejudice Gakmak(角膜). He said people must first remove the Gakmak that blocks them from recognizing beauty as beauty. In short, Park Jega insisted on discarding stereotypes and closely observing objects because people can create a good painting only in an unintentional state to obtain the form of the spirit. We cannot fully comprehend Park Jega's view of painting through the above discussion. It is necessary to have a broad understanding of his worldview and an integrated discussion of his poetry, calligraphy, and painting to understand his view of painting more in-depth.
朴济甲是活跃在朝鲜18世纪后期的学者和思想家。虽然他从来没有提出过精确的绘画理论,但他说自己从小就是一个绘画爱好者,长大后也一直喜欢画画。因此,本文通过考察他的序、跋、题诗来分析他的画观。我将朴济甲的“清空心灵、培养自然”的绘画观简单概括如下。首先,我从注重精神节奏的立场出发,分析了他强调精神的形式作为一种超越形象的形象的方面。因此,朴济加将“诗与画的边界相融”的理论运用到书画创作中,积极肯定了书画的价值。他体现了自然的绘画意志,散发着文人绘画的精神情趣。他在忠实地拥有形似形式的形式美的同时,也实现了描写思维的世界。因此,他忠实于表现超越形象的形象的精神节奏。其次,我考察了他从自然精神的角度创造了自然情趣的生命力。因此,将心灵空化是实现与外界事物审美共融的前提,也与朴济加的开放思维有关。既然人们已经有了先入为主的观念,那么在绘画之前就应该清空头脑。朴济加称这种偏见为“Gakmak”。他说,人们必须首先消除阻碍他们认识美就是美的Gakmak。简而言之,朴济加坚持摒弃刻板印象,密切观察对象,因为人们只有在无意识的状态下才能创造出一幅好画,以获得精神的形式。通过以上讨论,我们无法完全理解朴济甲的绘画观。要更深入地了解他的画观,有必要对他的世界观有一个广泛的认识,对他的诗、书、画有一个综合的论述。
{"title":"Study on Chojeong Park Jega’s View of Painting to Empty Mind and Cultivate Nature","authors":"Myungho Lim","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.04","url":null,"abstract":"Park Jega was a scholar and thinker active in the late 18th century of the Joseon Dynasty. Although he never presented a precise painting theory, he said that he has been a painting enthusiast since childhood and continued to enjoy painting even after he grew up. Thus, in this paper, I analyzed his view of the painting by investigating his preface, postscript, and inscribed poem of painting. \u0000I briefly summarized Park Jega's view of painting to empty the mind and cultivate nature as follows. First, I analyzed the aspect that he emphasized the form of spirit as an image beyond the image from the stance of focusing on the rhythm of spirit. As a result, Park Jega actively affirmed the value of calligraphy and painting by applying the theory that the boundary of poetry is mutually compatible with that of painting to the creation of calligraphy and painting. He embodied the natural painting will that exudes the spiritual taste of literati painting. Also, he realized the world of describing the thinking while faithfully possessing the formative beauty of resembling the form. Thus, he was faithful to the rhythm of spirit that expresses the image beyond the image. Second, I examined the fact that he created the vitality of the natural taste of nature in terms of the natural spirit. As a result, the emptiness to empty the mind is a premise that can achieve aesthetic communion with external objects and was also related to Park Jega’s open thinking. Since people already have preconceived notions, they should empty their minds before painting. Park Jega called that prejudice Gakmak(角膜). He said people must first remove the Gakmak that blocks them from recognizing beauty as beauty. In short, Park Jega insisted on discarding stereotypes and closely observing objects because people can create a good painting only in an unintentional state to obtain the form of the spirit. \u0000We cannot fully comprehend Park Jega's view of painting through the above discussion. It is necessary to have a broad understanding of his worldview and an integrated discussion of his poetry, calligraphy, and painting to understand his view of painting more in-depth.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132731197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study on Calligraphy of Haseo(河西) Kim-In-hoo(金麟厚) A Study on Calligraphy of Haseo(河西) Kim-In-hoo(金麟厚)
Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.03
Ji-bok Yoo
Kim-In-hoo wrote the introduction to the Collected Poetry by the Sages of the 1519 Purge. He showed that calligraphy could be a medium for realizing the "Tao" just as the "Writing" was a means of expressing the "Tao". He wrote a "Boating Song of the Nine Bends at Wuyi" by Zhu Xi and wrote an explanation of the poem to his sons-in-law Cho Hee-moon and Yang Ja-jing. The shape of this character is based on the Regular Script of Wang Xizhi, but it is unique that Ahn Jinkyung's style of writing is added. Kim's cursive script is typical of his calligraphy. His cursive script strongly reflects the influence of Zhang Bi, which is close to the wild cursive script. Kim placed importance on the spirit that appears in the handwriting. His vigorous appearance in cursive script express his deviant spirit through cursive script. Jo Hui invited Kim In-hoo, Jeong Sa-ryong, and Shin-jam to his pavilion. At that time, one or two people wrote seven poems for them, which is very sensuous. It has not been revealed so far who wrote it, but it was confirmed that it was a cursive script by Kim. This work remains the only cursive script handwritten by him. Therefore, along with "Thousand-Character Classic in Cursive Style" it is valuable as a representative handwriting of Kim's cursive script.
金仁厚写了《1519年肃清圣贤诗集》的引言。他表明,书法可以是实现“道”的媒介,正如“文字”是表达“道”的手段一样。他写了朱熹的《武夷九曲舟歌》,并给他的女婿赵熙文和杨家静写了解释。这个字的形状是以王羲之的楷书为基础,但加入了安敬敬的笔迹,这是独一无二的。金氏的草书是典型的书法。他的草书强烈地反映了张弼的影响,接近于野草书。金委员长非常重视书写的精神。他草书中粗犷的外表,通过草书表达了他的离经叛道精神。赵辉邀请金仁厚、郑思龙、辛贾姆到他的亭子里。当时,有一两个人为他们写了七首诗,这是非常感性的。虽然还不知道是谁写的,但可以确定是金氏的草书。这是他唯一的草书。因此,它与《草书千字经》一起,作为金氏草书的代表笔迹,具有很高的价值。
{"title":"A Study on Calligraphy of Haseo(河西) Kim-In-hoo(金麟厚)","authors":"Ji-bok Yoo","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2022.41.03","url":null,"abstract":"Kim-In-hoo wrote the introduction to the Collected Poetry by the Sages of the 1519 Purge. He showed that calligraphy could be a medium for realizing the \"Tao\" just as the \"Writing\" was a means of expressing the \"Tao\". He wrote a \"Boating Song of the Nine Bends at Wuyi\" by Zhu Xi and wrote an explanation of the poem to his sons-in-law Cho Hee-moon and Yang Ja-jing. The shape of this character is based on the Regular Script of Wang Xizhi, but it is unique that Ahn Jinkyung's style of writing is added. \u0000Kim's cursive script is typical of his calligraphy. His cursive script strongly reflects the influence of Zhang Bi, which is close to the wild cursive script. Kim placed importance on the spirit that appears in the handwriting. His vigorous appearance in cursive script express his deviant spirit through cursive script. \u0000Jo Hui invited Kim In-hoo, Jeong Sa-ryong, and Shin-jam to his pavilion. At that time, one or two people wrote seven poems for them, which is very sensuous. It has not been revealed so far who wrote it, but it was confirmed that it was a cursive script by Kim. This work remains the only cursive script handwritten by him. Therefore, along with \"Thousand-Character Classic in Cursive Style\" it is valuable as a representative handwriting of Kim's cursive script.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131513603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Korean Society of Calligraphy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1