Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.002
Carrie Ho , Neena Kennedy , Mengyang Di , Ajay K. Gopal , Ryan C. Lynch , Kevin Ng , Qian V. Wu , Christina Poh , Vikram Raghunathan , Heather Rasmussen , Mazyar Shadman , Brian G. Till , Chaitra S. Ujjani , Stephen D. Smith
Background
Frontline therapy fails to cure ∼ 25% of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), underscoring the need for clinical trials to improve outcomes. However, enrollment remains limited by logistical and structural barriers. Investigator-initiated trials (IITs) at our center enroll patients 5 to 10 times faster than industry-sponsored trials, yet the influence of geography and socioeconomic status on participation remains poorly understood.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed adults with newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) referred to Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (FHCC) between October 2022 and June 2024. Patients were prescreened by a clinical research nurse and investigators for frontline IIT eligibility. Demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic data were collected, including sex, race, ethnicity, distance from FHCC, area deprivation index, insurance, and interpreter need. Logistic and elastic net regression were used to evaluate predictors of trial enrollment. Trial-ineligible patients were analyzed descriptively.
Results
Of 153 patients, 68 (44%) were trial-eligible; 24 (35%) enrolled. Enrolled patients lived closer to FHCC (median 15 vs. 50 miles; P = .00015) and had lower ADI scores (median 8 vs. 21; P = .006) than non-enrolled eligible patients. In univariate analysis, both distance and ADI were associated with enrollment; in multivariable stepwise regression, only distance remained significant. Elastic net regression identified both distance and ADI as frequently selected predictors. Among 85 trial-ineligible patients, 61% had already initiated treatment; these patients also lived farther away and in more deprived areas.
Conclusion
Geographic distance and neighborhood deprivation significantly influenced trial enrollment, even in investigator-initiated trials (IITs). Decentralized trial models, telemedicine triage, and system-level interventions are needed to reduce these inequities.
背景:一线治疗不能治愈约25%的大b细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者,这强调了临床试验改善预后的必要性。然而,入学人数仍然受到后勤和结构障碍的限制。在我们的研究中心,研究者发起的试验(iit)招募患者的速度比行业赞助的试验快5到10倍,但地理和社会经济地位对参与的影响仍然知之甚少。方法:我们回顾性分析了2022年10月至2024年6月期间Fred Hutchinson癌症中心(FHCC)新诊断的大b细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的成人患者。患者由临床研究护士和调查人员预先筛选一线IIT资格。收集了人口统计、地理和社会经济数据,包括性别、种族、民族、与FHCC的距离、地区剥夺指数、保险和翻译需求。采用Logistic和弹性网络回归评价试验入组的预测因素。对不符合试验条件的患者进行描述性分析。结果:153例患者中,68例(44%)符合试验条件;24人(35%)入学。入组患者居住距离FHCC较近(中位数15 vs 50英里,P = 0.00015), ADI评分较低(中位数8 vs 21, P = 0.006)。在单变量分析中,距离和ADI都与入组相关;在多变量逐步回归中,只有距离仍然显著。弹性网回归确定了距离和ADI作为经常选择的预测因子。在85名不符合试验条件的患者中,61%已经开始治疗;这些病人也住得更远,住在更贫困的地区。结论:地理距离和邻里剥夺显著影响试验入组,即使在研究者发起的试验(IITs)中也是如此。分散的试验模式、远程医疗分诊和系统级干预需要减少这些不公平现象。
{"title":"Barriers to Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial Enrollment in Frontline Large B-Cell Lymphoma","authors":"Carrie Ho , Neena Kennedy , Mengyang Di , Ajay K. Gopal , Ryan C. Lynch , Kevin Ng , Qian V. Wu , Christina Poh , Vikram Raghunathan , Heather Rasmussen , Mazyar Shadman , Brian G. Till , Chaitra S. Ujjani , Stephen D. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frontline therapy fails to cure ∼ 25% of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), underscoring the need for clinical trials to improve outcomes. However, enrollment remains limited by logistical and structural barriers. Investigator-initiated trials (IITs) at our center enroll patients 5 to 10 times faster than industry-sponsored trials, yet the influence of geography and socioeconomic status on participation remains poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed adults with newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) referred to Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (FHCC) between October 2022 and June 2024. Patients were prescreened by a clinical research nurse and investigators for frontline IIT eligibility. Demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic data were collected, including sex, race, ethnicity, distance from FHCC, area deprivation index, insurance, and interpreter need. Logistic and elastic net regression were used to evaluate predictors of trial enrollment. Trial-ineligible patients were analyzed descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 153 patients, 68 (44%) were trial-eligible; 24 (35%) enrolled. Enrolled patients lived closer to FHCC (median 15 vs. 50 miles; <em>P</em> = .00015) and had lower ADI scores (median 8 vs. 21; <em>P</em> = .006) than non-enrolled eligible patients. In univariate analysis, both distance and ADI were associated with enrollment; in multivariable stepwise regression, only distance remained significant. Elastic net regression identified both distance and ADI as frequently selected predictors. Among 85 trial-ineligible patients, 61% had already initiated treatment; these patients also lived farther away and in more deprived areas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Geographic distance and neighborhood deprivation significantly influenced trial enrollment, even in investigator-initiated trials (IITs). Decentralized trial models, telemedicine triage, and system-level interventions are needed to reduce these inequities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages e367-e375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145596272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive nodal T- and natural killer (NK)-cell lymphoma (EB-nTNKL) is a newly defined, rare, and aggressive EBV-driven lymphoid malignancy that typically affects older individuals, predominantly male, of East Asian descent. It is characterized by a cytotoxic T-cell phenotype, with only a limited number of cases documented to date.
Methods
We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 11 patients diagnosed with EB-nTNKL via lymph node biopsy in Japan in order to better characterize its clinicopathological features and outcomes.
Results
The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range 24-81), and most patients presented with advanced-stage (III/IV) disease, B symptoms, and high-risk International Prognostic Index scores. Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (median 614 U/L) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (median 5247 U/mL) levels were observed in all cases. All cases expressed cytotoxic molecules (granzyme B and/or TIA-1), indicating a cytotoxic T/NK-cell phenotype, and 8 cases were CD8-positive. Responses to conventional chemotherapy were poor. The median overall survival was only 2.9 months, with 6 of 11 patients dying within 3 months of diagnosis.
Conclusions
EB-nTNKL represents a distinct clinicopathological entity with a fulminant clinical course and profound chemoresistance, resulting in an extremely poor prognosis. However, differentiation from other EBV-associated T/NK-cell neoplasms, particularly those arising in younger patients, remains a diagnostic challenge and warrants further clinicopathological investigation. These dismal outcomes underscore an urgent need to develop more effective therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"Dismal Outcome of EBV-Positive Nodal T/NK-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study","authors":"Satoshi Ichikawa , Noriko Fukuhara , Yuna Katsuoka , Yuki Ishizawa , Kosuke Kamata , Masahiko Fukatsu , Takayo Nagao , Kazunori Murai , Hisayuki Yokoyama , Yoshiko Tamai , Takayuki Ikezoe , Ryo Ichinohasama , Shigeki Ito , Naoto Takahashi , Hideo Harigae","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive nodal T- and natural killer (NK)-cell lymphoma (EB-nTNKL) is a newly defined, rare, and aggressive EBV-driven lymphoid malignancy that typically affects older individuals, predominantly male, of East Asian descent. It is characterized by a cytotoxic T-cell phenotype, with only a limited number of cases documented to date.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 11 patients diagnosed with EB-nTNKL via lymph node biopsy in Japan in order to better characterize its clinicopathological features and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range 24-81), and most patients presented with advanced-stage (III/IV) disease, B symptoms, and high-risk International Prognostic Index scores. Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (median 614 U/L) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (median 5247 U/mL) levels were observed in all cases. All cases expressed cytotoxic molecules (granzyme B and/or TIA-1), indicating a cytotoxic T/NK-cell phenotype, and 8 cases were CD8-positive. Responses to conventional chemotherapy were poor. The median overall survival was only 2.9 months, with 6 of 11 patients dying within 3 months of diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>EB-nTNKL represents a distinct clinicopathological entity with a fulminant clinical course and profound chemoresistance, resulting in an extremely poor prognosis. However, differentiation from other EBV-associated T/NK-cell neoplasms, particularly those arising in younger patients, remains a diagnostic challenge and warrants further clinicopathological investigation. These dismal outcomes underscore an urgent need to develop more effective therapeutic strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages e376-e384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.006
Colin J. Thomas , Stefan K. Barta
T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are a heterogenous group of malignancies that represent a minority of all NHL cases world-wide. Outcomes with traditional chemotherapy-based regimens remain poor with notably dismal outcomes in the relapsed/refractory setting. The power of immunotherapy has revolutionized treatments and outcomes for hematologic malignancies and has already made significant strides in addressing the treatment needs in T-cell NHLs. Given the heterogeneity of T-cell lymphoma subtypes and biology, a wide variety of innovative immunotherapies have been evolving to treat these various malignancies. Here, we review the promising advancement of various immunotherapies in T-cell NHLs including antibody-based therapies targeting T-cell surface antigens and checkpoint signaling, as well as the expanding strategies for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in this difficult to treat disease space.
{"title":"SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | The Promise of Immunotherapies in T-Cell Lymphoma","authors":"Colin J. Thomas , Stefan K. Barta","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are a heterogenous group of malignancies that represent a minority of all NHL cases world-wide. Outcomes with traditional chemotherapy-based regimens remain poor with notably dismal outcomes in the relapsed/refractory setting. The power of immunotherapy has revolutionized treatments and outcomes for hematologic malignancies and has already made significant strides in addressing the treatment needs in T-cell NHLs. Given the heterogeneity of T-cell lymphoma subtypes and biology, a wide variety of innovative immunotherapies have been evolving to treat these various malignancies. Here, we review the promising advancement of various immunotherapies in T-cell NHLs including antibody-based therapies targeting T-cell surface antigens and checkpoint signaling, as well as the expanding strategies for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in this difficult to treat disease space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages e299-e314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145198617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.012
Nilanjan Ghosh , John N. Allan , Sabyasachi Ghosh , Zaina P. Qureshi , Alex Bokun , Susan O’Brien
Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a cornerstone of first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). While generally well tolerated, dose adjustments may be used in some patients to manage adverse events or tolerability issues. This review examines the real-world outcomes such as the effectiveness and duration of therapy of first-line ibrutinib treatment in patients with CLL/SLL, including those with high-risk genomic features. The role of flexible dosing strategies, including dose adjustments or interruptions, and their role in optimizing ibrutinib treatment duration and outcomes are explored. Consistent with results from clinical trials, real-world evidence supports the effectiveness of ibrutinib dosing flexibility in managing adverse events while maintaining long-term clinical benefits. Ibrutinib dose adjustments help optimize treatment persistence and reduce treatment discontinuations, thereby enabling continuous ibrutinib treatment. Furthermore, real-world evidence suggests that ibrutinib dose flexibility contributes to reduced healthcare resource utilization, including fewer hospitalizations and outpatient visits, thus lowering the economic burden of CLL/SLL treatment. Long-term effectiveness, together with lower costs and the ability to tailor ibrutinib dosing to individual patients, supports ibrutinib as a pivotal agent in the management of CLL/SLL.
{"title":"Real-World Evidence on Ibrutinib in First-Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/ Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Comprehensive Review","authors":"Nilanjan Ghosh , John N. Allan , Sabyasachi Ghosh , Zaina P. Qureshi , Alex Bokun , Susan O’Brien","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a cornerstone of first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). While generally well tolerated, dose adjustments may be used in some patients to manage adverse events or tolerability issues. This review examines the real-world outcomes such as the effectiveness and duration of therapy of first-line ibrutinib treatment in patients with CLL/SLL, including those with high-risk genomic features. The role of flexible dosing strategies, including dose adjustments or interruptions, and their role in optimizing ibrutinib treatment duration and outcomes are explored. Consistent with results from clinical trials, real-world evidence supports the effectiveness of ibrutinib dosing flexibility in managing adverse events while maintaining long-term clinical benefits. Ibrutinib dose adjustments help optimize treatment persistence and reduce treatment discontinuations, thereby enabling continuous ibrutinib treatment. Furthermore, real-world evidence suggests that ibrutinib dose flexibility contributes to reduced healthcare resource utilization, including fewer hospitalizations and outpatient visits, thus lowering the economic burden of CLL/SLL treatment. Long-term effectiveness, together with lower costs and the ability to tailor ibrutinib dosing to individual patients, supports ibrutinib as a pivotal agent in the management of CLL/SLL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 142-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.016
Roberto Mina , Elisabetta Antonioli , Gregorio Barilà , Niccolò Bolli , Cirino Botta , Anna Furlan , Carmine Liberatore , Marina Martello , Sonia Moré , Stefania Oliva , Bernardo Rossini , Elona Saraci , Antonio Giovanni Solimando , Paola Storti , Elena Zamagni
Much evidence supports the assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) status in the clinical management of multiple myeloma (MM). Using highly sensitive next-generation flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing tests to detect MRD enables clinicians to evaluate the depth of response and therefore the prognosis of patients with MM as achieving deep and sustained (≥ 12 months) undetectable MRD correlates with prolonged survival in patients with MM. Because of this, undetectable MRD (also referred to as MRD-negativity) has been recognized and approved by the FDA as an early endpoint in clinical trials to accelerate regulatory approval of new treatments for MM. However, many questions remain around how (methods, sensitivity levels), who (all patients vs. those achieving complete/partial response), and when to test in relation to treatment phases, defining the optimal duration for sustained undetectable MRD, and how MRD can be used to guide treatment strategies in clinical practice. This narrative review has examined data from key clinical trials in MM to analyze the implementation of MRD testing in the newly-diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM settings. We have also summarized trials that test MRD-driven approaches.
{"title":"Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Bridging the Gap Between Clinical Trials and Real-life Application","authors":"Roberto Mina , Elisabetta Antonioli , Gregorio Barilà , Niccolò Bolli , Cirino Botta , Anna Furlan , Carmine Liberatore , Marina Martello , Sonia Moré , Stefania Oliva , Bernardo Rossini , Elona Saraci , Antonio Giovanni Solimando , Paola Storti , Elena Zamagni","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Much evidence supports the assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) status in the clinical management of multiple myeloma (MM). Using highly sensitive next-generation flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing tests to detect MRD enables clinicians to evaluate the depth of response and therefore the prognosis of patients with MM as achieving deep and sustained (≥ 12 months) undetectable MRD correlates with prolonged survival in patients with MM. Because of this, undetectable MRD (also referred to as MRD-negativity) has been recognized and approved by the FDA as an early endpoint in clinical trials to accelerate regulatory approval of new treatments for MM. However, many questions remain around how (methods, sensitivity levels), who (all patients vs. those achieving complete/partial response), and when to test in relation to treatment phases, defining the optimal duration for sustained undetectable MRD, and how MRD can be used to guide treatment strategies in clinical practice. This narrative review has examined data from key clinical trials in MM to analyze the implementation of MRD testing in the newly-diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM settings. We have also summarized trials that test MRD-driven approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 154-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147354179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.002
Tuija Tapaninen , Vesa Lindström , Olivia Hölsä , Emma-Leena Alarmo , Liisa Ukkola-Vuoti , Kimmo Porkka , Oscar Brück
Background
Targeted therapies have replaced chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but high-risk CLL patients with TP53 aberrations continue to represent a significant unmet medical need. We profiled treatment patterns, outcomes, and adverse effects in a large, unselected cohort of high-risk CLL patients.
Patients and Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1,720 CLL patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2023 within the Helsinki University Hospital district in Southern Finland. We focused on 543 patients who received first-line (1 L) systemic treatment.
Results
Of the 543 treated patients, 78 (14.4%) had a TP53 aberrations. A clear shift in treatment patterns occurred after 2018, with targeted therapies comprising over one-third of 1 L regimens. For high-risk patients, ibrutinib use at the 1 L stage rose dramatically after 2018, replacing chemoimmunotherapy as the most common treatment. This change coincided with a marked increase in the median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) for high-risk patients, from 21.2 months (2012-2017) to 26.0 months (2018-2023). Increased TP53 and IGHV mutation testing rates facilitated more personalized treatment approaches over time. Adverse events were less frequent in patients receiving targeted therapies (62.1%) compared to those on non-targeted regimens (73.5%). Despite these improvements, the median overall survival (OS) for high-risk patients remained challenging at 47.1 months after 1 L treatment.
Conclusion
The transition to targeted therapies has improved outcomes for high-risk CLL patients. Nevertheless, outcomes for high-risk CLL patients remain inferior to those reported in clinical trials, underscoring the need for real-world evidence and improved therapies.
{"title":"Improved Outcomes Following the Adoption of Targeted Therapies in High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated in Southern Finland","authors":"Tuija Tapaninen , Vesa Lindström , Olivia Hölsä , Emma-Leena Alarmo , Liisa Ukkola-Vuoti , Kimmo Porkka , Oscar Brück","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Targeted therapies have replaced chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but high-risk CLL patients with <em>TP53</em> aberrations continue to represent a significant unmet medical need. We profiled treatment patterns, outcomes, and adverse effects in a large, unselected cohort of high-risk CLL patients.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1,720 CLL patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2023 within the Helsinki University Hospital district in Southern Finland. We focused on 543 patients who received first-line (1 L) systemic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 543 treated patients, 78 (14.4%) had a <em>TP53</em> aberrations. A clear shift in treatment patterns occurred after 2018, with targeted therapies comprising over one-third of 1 L regimens. For high-risk patients, ibrutinib use at the 1 L stage rose dramatically after 2018, replacing chemoimmunotherapy as the most common treatment. This change coincided with a marked increase in the median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) for high-risk patients, from 21.2 months (2012-2017) to 26.0 months (2018-2023). Increased <em>TP53</em> and <em>IGHV</em> mutation testing rates facilitated more personalized treatment approaches over time. Adverse events were less frequent in patients receiving targeted therapies (62.1%) compared to those on non-targeted regimens (73.5%). Despite these improvements, the median overall survival (OS) for high-risk patients remained challenging at 47.1 months after 1 L treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The transition to targeted therapies has improved outcomes for high-risk CLL patients. Nevertheless, outcomes for high-risk CLL patients remain inferior to those reported in clinical trials, underscoring the need for real-world evidence and improved therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages e397-e407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.009
Hajime Yasuda , Jun Ando , Miki Ando
COVID-19 is a threat to patients with hematological malignancies (HM) even in the Omicron era, because mortality rates are still high in HM patients, and a significant number of patients develop a protracted disease course called “persistent COVID-19 (pCOVID-19)” which can continue for weeks to months. pCOVID-19 can be life-threatening by itself, but also drastically affects the disease course of the underlying HM by delaying or terminating chemotherapy. Also, patients with pCOVID-19 can be potentially contagious, and timing of ending isolation is a dilemma the hematology ward faces. Furthermore, pCOVID-19 has been reported to lead to acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 multidrug-resistant mutations, which is an alarming issue for both the patient and public health. The optimal management method of pCOVID-19 is currently unknown, and because HM patients are excluded from randomized clinical trials, evidence is limited to case reports and small case series. We carried out a comprehensive literature review of Omicron pCOVID-19 occurring in HM patients, compiled the scattered evidence, and provide practical recommendations which can be of guide to clinicians. Main topics discussed within this review include efficacy of vaccinations in HM patients, risk factors for developing pCOVID-19 (B-cell depleting agents, bendamustine + rituximab therapy, bispecific T-cell engagers, etc.), treatment of pCOVID-19 including extended/sequential/combination therapy incorporating antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, molnupiravir, and ensitrelvir) and convalescent plasma/intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, monitoring pCOVID-19 with reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and optimal target cycle threshold values as goals of therapy.
{"title":"Persistent COVID-19 in Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A Focused Review in the Omicron Era","authors":"Hajime Yasuda , Jun Ando , Miki Ando","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.11.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>COVID-19 is a threat to patients with hematological malignancies (HM) even in the Omicron era, because mortality rates are still high in HM patients, and a significant number of patients develop a protracted disease course called “persistent COVID-19 (pCOVID-19)” which can continue for weeks to months. pCOVID-19 can be life-threatening by itself, but also drastically affects the disease course of the underlying HM by delaying or terminating chemotherapy. Also, patients with pCOVID-19 can be potentially contagious, and timing of ending isolation is a dilemma the hematology ward faces. Furthermore, pCOVID-19 has been reported to lead to acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 multidrug-resistant mutations, which is an alarming issue for both the patient and public health. The optimal management method of pCOVID-19 is currently unknown, and because HM patients are excluded from randomized clinical trials, evidence is limited to case reports and small case series. We carried out a comprehensive literature review of Omicron pCOVID-19 occurring in HM patients, compiled the scattered evidence, and provide practical recommendations which can be of guide to clinicians. Main topics discussed within this review include efficacy of vaccinations in HM patients, risk factors for developing pCOVID-19 (B-cell depleting agents, bendamustine + rituximab therapy, bispecific T-cell engagers, etc.), treatment of pCOVID-19 including extended/sequential/combination therapy incorporating antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, molnupiravir, and ensitrelvir) and convalescent plasma/intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, monitoring pCOVID-19 with reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and optimal target cycle threshold values as goals of therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages e385-e396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-03DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.018
Hannah Goulart , Elias Jabbour
The treatment landscape of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has been transformed by the incorporation of immunotherapy and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into frontline regimens, resulting in meaningful improvements in long-term survival. Such advances have allowed for a reduction in both the intensity and duration of chemotherapy without compromising outcomes, a particularly important goal for older adults, who are less tolerant to intensive chemotherapy and often harbor higher-risk disease features, including TP53 mutations that confer resistance to traditional chemotherapy. Largely chemotherapy-free regimens may alleviate some of the poor outcomes that older patients experience; such regimens are under investigation. While the risk factors that portend inferior outcomes for patients with Philadelphia (Ph)-positive B-ALL are still being defined in the setting of immunotherapy-based regimens and more potent TKIs, it is evident that an elevated baseline white blood cell count is a strong predictor of relapse. The role of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy as consolidation for patients with high-risk Ph-positive B-ALL is actively being explored, alongside efforts to identify factors that influence CAR T-cell expansion and persistence as determinants of response durability. Advances in more sensitive assessments of measurable residual disease (MRD) using next generation sequencing (NGS) will help inform which patients may benefit from additional consolidative strategies. Novel agents under development include the subcutaneous (SC) form of blinatumomab, which has demonstrated efficacy even in patients with prior blinatumomab exposure. Altogether, these developments frame the next set of questions in ALL, which will be addressed in this review.
{"title":"SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | SOHO 2025 Next Questions: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia","authors":"Hannah Goulart , Elias Jabbour","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The treatment landscape of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has been transformed by the incorporation of immunotherapy and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into frontline regimens, resulting in meaningful improvements in long-term survival. Such advances have allowed for a reduction in both the intensity and duration of chemotherapy without compromising outcomes, a particularly important goal for older adults, who are less tolerant to intensive chemotherapy and often harbor higher-risk disease features, including <em>TP53</em> mutations that confer resistance to traditional chemotherapy. Largely chemotherapy-free regimens may alleviate some of the poor outcomes that older patients experience; such regimens are under investigation. While the risk factors that portend inferior outcomes for patients with Philadelphia (Ph)-positive B-ALL are still being defined in the setting of immunotherapy-based regimens and more potent TKIs, it is evident that an elevated baseline white blood cell count is a strong predictor of relapse. The role of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy as consolidation for patients with high-risk Ph-positive B-ALL is actively being explored, alongside efforts to identify factors that influence CAR T-cell expansion and persistence as determinants of response durability. Advances in more sensitive assessments of measurable residual disease (MRD) using next generation sequencing (NGS) will help inform which patients may benefit from additional consolidative strategies. Novel agents under development include the subcutaneous (SC) form of blinatumomab, which has demonstrated efficacy even in patients with prior blinatumomab exposure. Altogether, these developments frame the next set of questions in ALL, which will be addressed in this review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 128-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.015
Cesar Rodriguez , Cyrille Touzeau , Edvan de Queiroz Crusoe , Fernando Vieira Pericole , Vania Hungria
Purpose
Bispecific antibodies emerged as a new class of treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Education on the practicalities of delivery and patient management is vital to optimize outcomes with these novel agents.
Methods
A group of 5 experienced hematologists from centers in the United States, Europe and Latin America met to discuss key considerations for bispecific antibody therapy and agree on best practice advice.
Results and Discussion
This paper presents advice for best practice at each stage of the bispecific antibody therapy patient journey: patient eligibility, pretreatment medication, step-up dosing, treatment, management of adverse events and long-term care.
Conclusion
We believe that the expert insights presented here will help to educate healthcare professionals and optimize patient outcomes by guiding the implementation of bispecific antibody therapy into real-world practice.
{"title":"Bispecific Antibody Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: A Practical Toolkit","authors":"Cesar Rodriguez , Cyrille Touzeau , Edvan de Queiroz Crusoe , Fernando Vieira Pericole , Vania Hungria","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Bispecific antibodies emerged as a new class of treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Education on the practicalities of delivery and patient management is vital to optimize outcomes with these novel agents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A group of 5 experienced hematologists from centers in the United States, Europe and Latin America met to discuss key considerations for bispecific antibody therapy and agree on best practice advice.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>This paper presents advice for best practice at each stage of the bispecific antibody therapy patient journey: patient eligibility, pretreatment medication, step-up dosing, treatment, management of adverse events and long-term care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We believe that the expert insights presented here will help to educate healthcare professionals and optimize patient outcomes by guiding the implementation of bispecific antibody therapy into real-world practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 169-177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2026.01.011
Gonca Ozcan, Mark Roschewski
Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is a heterogeneous disease for which anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy cures most patients. However, a substantial minority of patients experience refractory disease or relapse, and outcomes remain poor. Improving frontline cure rates therefore remains a fundamental objective in the lymphoma field and has led to the development of multiple therapeutic strategies. Herein, we discuss approaches aimed at improving outcomes beyond standard chemotherapy and address 4 transformative questions in LBCL: (1) can immunotherapy improve frontline cure rates; (2) is precision medicine a sound approach to overcome genetic heterogeneity; (3) can LBCL be cured without chemotherapy; (4) can circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) aid clinical decision-making in response-adapted strategies. Together, these approaches reflect evolving strategies that may improve frontline outcomes and inform future treatment paradigms for patients with LBCL.
{"title":"SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Addressing the Transformative Questions in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas.","authors":"Gonca Ozcan, Mark Roschewski","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2026.01.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2026.01.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is a heterogeneous disease for which anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy cures most patients. However, a substantial minority of patients experience refractory disease or relapse, and outcomes remain poor. Improving frontline cure rates therefore remains a fundamental objective in the lymphoma field and has led to the development of multiple therapeutic strategies. Herein, we discuss approaches aimed at improving outcomes beyond standard chemotherapy and address 4 transformative questions in LBCL: (1) can immunotherapy improve frontline cure rates; (2) is precision medicine a sound approach to overcome genetic heterogeneity; (3) can LBCL be cured without chemotherapy; (4) can circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) aid clinical decision-making in response-adapted strategies. Together, these approaches reflect evolving strategies that may improve frontline outcomes and inform future treatment paradigms for patients with LBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147321233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}