Pub Date : 2025-10-13DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.011
Lukas L Lauer, Craig A Portell
Introduction: Follicular lymphoma typically affects patients in their fifth, sixth, and seventh decades of life and carries a median survival of 10 years. Rituximab induction followed by maintenance has been increasingly used in follicular lymphoma for patients with low tumor burden progression who wish to receive treatment but want to avoid the side effect profile of chemotherapy. Data on the efficacy of this course is limited for patients previously treated with rituximab as well as those with intermediate risk disease. Here we present data from a single center on the efficacy of induction and maintenance rituximab in a cohort with a mix of intermediate and low risk patients.
Patients and methods: 26 patients with FL underwent a course of induction rituximab followed by maintenance from 2007 to 2024. 15% were bulky by GELF, 27% were high risk by FLIPI, and 35% had received prior treatment with all but one of the previously treated patients having received rituximab.
Results: Estimated median 2 year PFS was 71%, TTNT was 68%, and OS was 88%. Median follow up time was 1.72 years. Eight patients deepened their response during maintenance to a CR.
Conclusion: In this study, intermediate and low risk FL patients responded well to induction rituximab followed by maintenance with survival comparable to past studies of higher risk patients. This study provides evidence that even those patients previously treated with rituximab can benefit from retreatment rituximab with maintenance.
{"title":"Maintenance Rituximab Following Rituximab Induction for Follicular Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Lukas L Lauer, Craig A Portell","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Follicular lymphoma typically affects patients in their fifth, sixth, and seventh decades of life and carries a median survival of 10 years. Rituximab induction followed by maintenance has been increasingly used in follicular lymphoma for patients with low tumor burden progression who wish to receive treatment but want to avoid the side effect profile of chemotherapy. Data on the efficacy of this course is limited for patients previously treated with rituximab as well as those with intermediate risk disease. Here we present data from a single center on the efficacy of induction and maintenance rituximab in a cohort with a mix of intermediate and low risk patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>26 patients with FL underwent a course of induction rituximab followed by maintenance from 2007 to 2024. 15% were bulky by GELF, 27% were high risk by FLIPI, and 35% had received prior treatment with all but one of the previously treated patients having received rituximab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated median 2 year PFS was 71%, TTNT was 68%, and OS was 88%. Median follow up time was 1.72 years. Eight patients deepened their response during maintenance to a CR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, intermediate and low risk FL patients responded well to induction rituximab followed by maintenance with survival comparable to past studies of higher risk patients. This study provides evidence that even those patients previously treated with rituximab can benefit from retreatment rituximab with maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145457859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-13DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.010
Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Andrew Ip, Justin M Darrah, Tongsheng Wang, Guihua Zhang, Alex Mutebi, Tychell Branchcomb, Zhijie Ding, Anindit Chhibber, Fernando Rivas Navarro, Malene Risum, Mohammad Atiya, Samantha Brodkin, Anthony Wang, Abualbishr Alshreef, Diala Harb, Mariana Sacchi, Daniela Hoehn, Yasmin H Karimi
Background: This indirect treatment comparison evaluated epcoritamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Epcor+GemOx) versus rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Methods: Individual patient data (IPD) for Epcor+GemOx from EPCORE NHL-2 Arm 5 (NCT04663347) were compared with clinical practice data for patients treated with R-GemOx using 2 methodologies: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using published aggregate data from clinical sites in France (Cazelles et al. Lymphoma. 2021;62:2161) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using IPD from the US-based COTA database (COTA Healthcare). Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Results: In the MAIC, after adjustment, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (86.8% vs 38.3%; relative risk [RR], 2.27 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-2.93]; P < .0001) and CR rate (71.2% vs 32.7%; RR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.61-2.96]; P < .0001). Median PFS was 26.7 versus 4.8 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.67]; P < .001); median OS was not reached with Epcor+GemOx versus 10.0 months with R-GemOx (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29-1.00]; P = .05). In the IPTW, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (88.5% vs 35.6%; RR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.80-3.43]; P < .0001), CR rate (63.9% vs 10.2%; RR, 6.25 [95% CI, 3.08-12.68]; P < .0001), median PFS (11.2 vs 2.4 months; HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.15-0.36]; P < .001), and median OS (21.6 vs 8.3 months; HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30-0.74]; P = .002).
Conclusion: Epcor+GemOx provides significantly greater response rates and survival outcomes compared with R-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL.
背景:这项间接治疗比较评估了依可利他单抗联合吉西他滨和奥沙利铂(Epcor+GemOx)与利妥昔单抗(R)-GemOx对不适合移植的复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的治疗效果。方法:EPCORE nll -2 Arm 5 (NCT04663347)的Epcor+GemOx的个体患者数据(IPD)与接受R-GemOx治疗的患者的临床实践数据使用两种方法进行比较:匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)使用来自法国临床站点的已发表的汇总数据(Cazelles等);淋巴瘤。2021;62:2161)和使用来自美国COTA数据库(COTA Healthcare)的IPD的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)。结果包括客观缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解率(CR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:在MAIC中,调整后Epcor+GemOx与R-GemOx的ORR显著高于前者(86.8% vs 38.3%),相对危险度[RR]为2.27[95%可信区间(CI), 1.76 ~ 2.93];P < 0.0001)和CR率(71.2% vs 32.7%; RR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.61 ~ 2.96]; P < 0.0001)。中位PFS为26.7 vs 4.8个月(风险比[HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.67]; P < .001);Epcor+GemOx组未达到中位总生存期,而R-GemOx组为10.0个月(HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29-1.00]; P = 0.05)。在IPTW中,Epcor+GemOx与R-GemOx的ORR (88.5% vs 35.6%; RR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.80-3.43]; P < 0.0001)、CR率(63.9% vs 10.2%; RR, 6.25 [95% CI, 3.08-12.68]; P < 0.0001)、中位PFS (11.2 vs 2.4个月;HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.15-0.36]; P < 0.001)和中位OS (21.6 vs 8.3个月;HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30-0.74]; P = 0.002)显著高于R-GemOx。结论:与R-GemOx相比,Epcor+GemOx在移植不合格的R/R DLBCL患者中提供了显着更高的缓解率和生存结果。
{"title":"Epcoritamab Plus Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus Rituximab Plus Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Transplant-Ineligible Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Match-Adjusted Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Andrew Ip, Justin M Darrah, Tongsheng Wang, Guihua Zhang, Alex Mutebi, Tychell Branchcomb, Zhijie Ding, Anindit Chhibber, Fernando Rivas Navarro, Malene Risum, Mohammad Atiya, Samantha Brodkin, Anthony Wang, Abualbishr Alshreef, Diala Harb, Mariana Sacchi, Daniela Hoehn, Yasmin H Karimi","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This indirect treatment comparison evaluated epcoritamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Epcor+GemOx) versus rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual patient data (IPD) for Epcor+GemOx from EPCORE NHL-2 Arm 5 (NCT04663347) were compared with clinical practice data for patients treated with R-GemOx using 2 methodologies: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using published aggregate data from clinical sites in France (Cazelles et al. Lymphoma. 2021;62:2161) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using IPD from the US-based COTA database (COTA Healthcare). Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the MAIC, after adjustment, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (86.8% vs 38.3%; relative risk [RR], 2.27 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-2.93]; P < .0001) and CR rate (71.2% vs 32.7%; RR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.61-2.96]; P < .0001). Median PFS was 26.7 versus 4.8 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.67]; P < .001); median OS was not reached with Epcor+GemOx versus 10.0 months with R-GemOx (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29-1.00]; P = .05). In the IPTW, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (88.5% vs 35.6%; RR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.80-3.43]; P < .0001), CR rate (63.9% vs 10.2%; RR, 6.25 [95% CI, 3.08-12.68]; P < .0001), median PFS (11.2 vs 2.4 months; HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.15-0.36]; P < .001), and median OS (21.6 vs 8.3 months; HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30-0.74]; P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epcor+GemOx provides significantly greater response rates and survival outcomes compared with R-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-13DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.009
Amanda Caruso, Filomena Emanuela Laddaga, Alba Fiorentino, Angela Maria Moramarco, Flavia Carbone, Clorinda Maria Luisa Derosa, Stefano Martinotti, Francesco Gaudio
Secondary breast cancer (SBC) is emerging as the most frequent solid tumour in female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with chest radiotherapy (RT). Women irradiated with ≥10 Gy before the age of 30 accumulate risks that rival those carried by BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with excess cases appearing ∼8 years after RT and persisting lifelong. This review weaves together epidemiological data, mechanistic evidence and clinical studies to elucidate how radiation dose and field, age at exposure, systemic regimens, host genomics and micro-environmental factors interact to drive SBC. Radiation-associated tumours display a distinctive profile-earlier onset, frequent bilaterality-posing unique therapeutic and prognostic challenges. We discuss current surveillance recommendations of annual mammography plus breast MRI from age 25 (or 8 years post-RT) and examine preventive strategies ranging from RT de-escalation and cardioprotective chemotherapy to lifestyle modification and selective chemoprevention. Finally, we highlight emerging imaging and molecular biomarkers-most notably MRI background parenchymal enhancement and polygenic risk scores-that may enable a shift from 1-size-fits-all follow-up to precision survivorship care.
{"title":"Breast Cancer Risk After Chest Radiotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: A Comprehensive Overview.","authors":"Amanda Caruso, Filomena Emanuela Laddaga, Alba Fiorentino, Angela Maria Moramarco, Flavia Carbone, Clorinda Maria Luisa Derosa, Stefano Martinotti, Francesco Gaudio","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Secondary breast cancer (SBC) is emerging as the most frequent solid tumour in female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with chest radiotherapy (RT). Women irradiated with ≥10 Gy before the age of 30 accumulate risks that rival those carried by BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with excess cases appearing ∼8 years after RT and persisting lifelong. This review weaves together epidemiological data, mechanistic evidence and clinical studies to elucidate how radiation dose and field, age at exposure, systemic regimens, host genomics and micro-environmental factors interact to drive SBC. Radiation-associated tumours display a distinctive profile-earlier onset, frequent bilaterality-posing unique therapeutic and prognostic challenges. We discuss current surveillance recommendations of annual mammography plus breast MRI from age 25 (or 8 years post-RT) and examine preventive strategies ranging from RT de-escalation and cardioprotective chemotherapy to lifestyle modification and selective chemoprevention. Finally, we highlight emerging imaging and molecular biomarkers-most notably MRI background parenchymal enhancement and polygenic risk scores-that may enable a shift from 1-size-fits-all follow-up to precision survivorship care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145457854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The coexistence of solid tumors and multiple myeloma (MM) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; however, data on clinical outcomes in this population remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who had synchronous or prior solid tumor malignancies.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 NDMM patients with a documented history of solid tumor, classified as either concurrent (diagnosed within 6 months) or prior. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to the timing of solid tumor diagnosis.
Results: The median age was 66 years, with a male predominance (58.5%). Breast (24.4%), lung (17.1%), colon, and prostate cancers (9.8% each) were the most common solid tumors. Extramedullary disease was observed only in the synchronous group (100% vs. 0%). Autologous transplantation was performed significantly less frequently in the synchronous group (26.3% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.041). Lenalidomide maintenance therapy was underutilized in patients with synchronous malignancies, reflecting possible clinical hesitation. Myeloma-related mortality occurred in 17.1% of patients, with a median overall survival of 48 months (range: 16-80), and no significant survival difference between synchronous and patient with prior solid tumor history group.
Conclusion: The presence of synchronous solid tumors in NDMM patients is associated with a higher rate of extramedullary disease and may influence clinical decision-making, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management and individualized treatment strategies. Furthermore, extramedullary involvement in MM should prompt evaluation for a potential coexisting solid malignancy.
实体瘤和多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的共存给诊断和治疗带来了挑战;然而,这一人群的临床结果数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估伴有同步或既往实体肿瘤恶性肿瘤的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的临床特征和生存结局。方法:回顾性分析41例有实体瘤病史的NDMM患者,分为并发(6个月内诊断)和既往。评估临床特征、治疗模式和结果。根据实体瘤诊断时间对患者进行分层。结果:中位年龄66岁,男性占58.5%。乳腺癌(24.4%)、肺癌(17.1%)、结肠癌和前列腺癌(各9.8%)是最常见的实体肿瘤。仅在同步组观察到髓外疾病(100% vs 0%)。同步组自体移植的发生率明显低于对照组(26.3% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.041)。来那度胺维持治疗在同步恶性肿瘤患者中的应用不足,反映了可能的临床犹豫。骨髓瘤相关死亡率为17.1%,中位总生存期为48个月(范围:16-80),同步组和既往有实体瘤病史组的生存期无显著差异。结论:NDMM患者同时存在实体瘤与较高的髓外病变发生率相关,并可能影响临床决策,强调需要多学科管理和个性化治疗策略。此外,MM的髓外受累应提示评估潜在的共存实体恶性肿瘤。
{"title":"The Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With Concurrent or Previous Solid Tumor History.","authors":"Yaşa Gül Mutlu, Şerife Emre Ünsal, Buse Güleç, İstemi Serin, Eren Arslan Davulcu, Gülçin Miyase Sönmez, Serkan Güven, Süreyya Yiğit Kaya, Senem Maral, Muzaffer Keklik, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Tugba Cetintepe, Güldane Cengiz Seval, Ömür Gökmen Sevindik","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The coexistence of solid tumors and multiple myeloma (MM) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; however, data on clinical outcomes in this population remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who had synchronous or prior solid tumor malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 NDMM patients with a documented history of solid tumor, classified as either concurrent (diagnosed within 6 months) or prior. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to the timing of solid tumor diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 66 years, with a male predominance (58.5%). Breast (24.4%), lung (17.1%), colon, and prostate cancers (9.8% each) were the most common solid tumors. Extramedullary disease was observed only in the synchronous group (100% vs. 0%). Autologous transplantation was performed significantly less frequently in the synchronous group (26.3% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.041). Lenalidomide maintenance therapy was underutilized in patients with synchronous malignancies, reflecting possible clinical hesitation. Myeloma-related mortality occurred in 17.1% of patients, with a median overall survival of 48 months (range: 16-80), and no significant survival difference between synchronous and patient with prior solid tumor history group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of synchronous solid tumors in NDMM patients is associated with a higher rate of extramedullary disease and may influence clinical decision-making, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management and individualized treatment strategies. Furthermore, extramedullary involvement in MM should prompt evaluation for a potential coexisting solid malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The management of relapsed / refractory myeloma particularly those who are heavily pretreated and penta-refractory has experienced a paradigm change with the advent of bispecific antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), offering new hope for these patients. The diverse experiences in the use of bispecific antibodies across Asian countries/regions underscore the complexities of integrating these therapies into clinical practice. With limited availability and varying access through clinical trials, compassionate access programmes and early commercial use, these agents are demonstrating impressive efficacy, yet present unique challenges in widespread adoption of these agents.
Methods: A roundtable discussion among myeloma experts from Asia has highlighted consistent efficacy but also raised concerns about the durability of response and the management of associated toxicities and infections.
Results: These discussions emphasize the need for ongoing research to better understand the nuances of treatment sequencing and patient selection.
Conclusions: The insights gained will contribute to developing strategic frameworks and consensus guidelines that can effectively guide clinicians in optimizing outcomes for myeloma patients in diverse healthcare settings.
{"title":"Perspectives on Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies use in Multiple Myeloma-Experience from Asian Countries.","authors":"Cinnie Soekojo, Shimin Jasmine Chung, Ming-Tao Tsai, Wenming Chen, Jeffrey Huang, Jin Seok Kim, Dong-Gun Lee, Chang Ki Min, Kazuhito Suzuki, Subramanian Swaminathan, Hiroyuki Takamatsu, Daryl Tan, Uday Yanamandra, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Wee Joo Chng","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of relapsed / refractory myeloma particularly those who are heavily pretreated and penta-refractory has experienced a paradigm change with the advent of bispecific antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), offering new hope for these patients. The diverse experiences in the use of bispecific antibodies across Asian countries/regions underscore the complexities of integrating these therapies into clinical practice. With limited availability and varying access through clinical trials, compassionate access programmes and early commercial use, these agents are demonstrating impressive efficacy, yet present unique challenges in widespread adoption of these agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A roundtable discussion among myeloma experts from Asia has highlighted consistent efficacy but also raised concerns about the durability of response and the management of associated toxicities and infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These discussions emphasize the need for ongoing research to better understand the nuances of treatment sequencing and patient selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The insights gained will contribute to developing strategic frameworks and consensus guidelines that can effectively guide clinicians in optimizing outcomes for myeloma patients in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-10DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.002
Muhammad Salman Faisal, Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Aleenah Mohsin, Husnain Mushtaq, Wania Ur Rehman, Mashhood Ur Rehman, Haseeba Javed, Fizza Mohsin, Muhammad Talha Shaukat, Bibi Maryam, Mohammad Ammar Al Osama, Salman Fazal
Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are essential therapies for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), yet their safety during pregnancy remains poorly characterized. We aimed to address this gap by providing pharmacovigilance data using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of pregnancy-related adverse events (AEs) reported to FAERS between January 2001 and December 2024. Reports involving female patients exposed to imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, bosutinib, or asciminib were extracted. Pregnancy-related AEs were categorized into maternal and fetal outcomes and presented descriptively. Disproportionality analyses were also performed for 2022-2024 to determine only the more relevant AEs in contemporary clinical practice. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to quantify associations.
Results: A total of 651 relevant pregnancy-related AEs were identified between 2001 and 2024, with imatinib accounting for the majority (n = 450), followed by nilotinib (n = 118), dasatinib (n = 64), ponatinib (n = 13), bosutinib (n = 4), and asciminib (n = 2). The most frequently reported maternal AEs were abortion (40.6%) and polyhydramnios (4.3%), while the most frequent perinatal complications included premature delivery (33.6%) and low birth weight (4.4%). In the disproportionality analysis (2022-2024), imatinib was significantly associated with pregnancy-related AEs (ROR 3.47; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05).
Conclusion: This pharmacovigilance analysis suggests a signal of pregnancy-related adverse events with imatinib, while evidence for other TKIs remains limited. Given the paucity of data, results should be interpreted with caution. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Pregnancy-Related Adverse Events with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Use in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A FAERS Pharmacovigilance Analysis (2001-2024).","authors":"Muhammad Salman Faisal, Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Aleenah Mohsin, Husnain Mushtaq, Wania Ur Rehman, Mashhood Ur Rehman, Haseeba Javed, Fizza Mohsin, Muhammad Talha Shaukat, Bibi Maryam, Mohammad Ammar Al Osama, Salman Fazal","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are essential therapies for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), yet their safety during pregnancy remains poorly characterized. We aimed to address this gap by providing pharmacovigilance data using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of pregnancy-related adverse events (AEs) reported to FAERS between January 2001 and December 2024. Reports involving female patients exposed to imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, bosutinib, or asciminib were extracted. Pregnancy-related AEs were categorized into maternal and fetal outcomes and presented descriptively. Disproportionality analyses were also performed for 2022-2024 to determine only the more relevant AEs in contemporary clinical practice. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to quantify associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 651 relevant pregnancy-related AEs were identified between 2001 and 2024, with imatinib accounting for the majority (n = 450), followed by nilotinib (n = 118), dasatinib (n = 64), ponatinib (n = 13), bosutinib (n = 4), and asciminib (n = 2). The most frequently reported maternal AEs were abortion (40.6%) and polyhydramnios (4.3%), while the most frequent perinatal complications included premature delivery (33.6%) and low birth weight (4.4%). In the disproportionality analysis (2022-2024), imatinib was significantly associated with pregnancy-related AEs (ROR 3.47; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pharmacovigilance analysis suggests a signal of pregnancy-related adverse events with imatinib, while evidence for other TKIs remains limited. Given the paucity of data, results should be interpreted with caution. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-10DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.008
Inés Martínez-Alfonzo, Diego Velasco-Rodríguez, Pablo Mínguez-Paniagua, Ignacio Mahillo-Fernández, Laura Fernández-Cuezva, Alberto Velasco-Valdazo, Rosa Vidal-Laso, Cristina Fernández Maqueda, Sara Martín-Herrero, Nuria Revilla, Ana Camila González-Teomiro, María Civeira-Marín, Elena Prieto, Amalia Domingo-González, Carlos Soto, Jose M Calvo-Villas, Elham Askari, Pilar Llamas-Sillero, Juana Serrano-López
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important complication in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), particularly during the first year after diagnosis. Existing risk assessment models show limited predictive accuracy. This study developed a novel risk scoring system using complementary approaches to improve VTE risk prediction in NDMM.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 225 NDMM patients from 4 hospitals (2014-2019) to develop a prediction score for first-year VTE. The model was built using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization with variables showing P < .25 in univariate analysis. Performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED scores were calculated for comparison.
Results: Among 225 patients (median age 68 years), 32 (14%) developed VTE, predominantly pulmonary embolism (71%) within the first year after diagnosis. The LASSO model had a c-statistic of 0.86 and identified ECOG ≥ 1, high R-ISS stage, high-dose dexamethasone (> 160 mg per cycle), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 370 IU/L, immunoparesis, spinal cord compression, and paralysis as independent predictors (AUC: 0.86). LASSO-derived PREVEMM score significantly outperformed existing tools (AUC: 0.88 vs 0.61 for both IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED).
Conclusion: PREVEMM score demonstrates superior VTE risk stratification capabilities, supporting its potential clinical utility for individualized thromboprophylaxis in NDMM.
{"title":"Development of PREVEMM: A Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients.","authors":"Inés Martínez-Alfonzo, Diego Velasco-Rodríguez, Pablo Mínguez-Paniagua, Ignacio Mahillo-Fernández, Laura Fernández-Cuezva, Alberto Velasco-Valdazo, Rosa Vidal-Laso, Cristina Fernández Maqueda, Sara Martín-Herrero, Nuria Revilla, Ana Camila González-Teomiro, María Civeira-Marín, Elena Prieto, Amalia Domingo-González, Carlos Soto, Jose M Calvo-Villas, Elham Askari, Pilar Llamas-Sillero, Juana Serrano-López","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important complication in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), particularly during the first year after diagnosis. Existing risk assessment models show limited predictive accuracy. This study developed a novel risk scoring system using complementary approaches to improve VTE risk prediction in NDMM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 225 NDMM patients from 4 hospitals (2014-2019) to develop a prediction score for first-year VTE. The model was built using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization with variables showing P < .25 in univariate analysis. Performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED scores were calculated for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 225 patients (median age 68 years), 32 (14%) developed VTE, predominantly pulmonary embolism (71%) within the first year after diagnosis. The LASSO model had a c-statistic of 0.86 and identified ECOG ≥ 1, high R-ISS stage, high-dose dexamethasone (> 160 mg per cycle), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 370 IU/L, immunoparesis, spinal cord compression, and paralysis as independent predictors (AUC: 0.86). LASSO-derived PREVEMM score significantly outperformed existing tools (AUC: 0.88 vs 0.61 for both IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PREVEMM score demonstrates superior VTE risk stratification capabilities, supporting its potential clinical utility for individualized thromboprophylaxis in NDMM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.013
Diana Cirstea, Kathleen Gallagher, Maxx King, Paola Dal Cin, Mark J Sloan, Marcela V Maus, Noopur Raje, Matthew Frigault, Valentina Nardi
{"title":"Transdifferentiation From Multiple Myeloma to Myeloid Sarcoma in the Setting of CAR T-Cell Therapy.","authors":"Diana Cirstea, Kathleen Gallagher, Maxx King, Paola Dal Cin, Mark J Sloan, Marcela V Maus, Noopur Raje, Matthew Frigault, Valentina Nardi","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-08DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.007
Mark A Fiala, Eva Lepisto, Chioma Amadi-Mgbenka, Jessica Schulman, George Mulligan, Hearn Jay Cho
Background: This study explored financial toxicity and its association with treatment satisfaction among a longitudinal cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
Patients and methods: The multiple myeloma research foundation (MMRF) CureCloud initiative (NCT03657251) is an observational study which collects biospecimens, clinical data, and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Participants completed the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) and the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ).
Results: At the initial time point, 214 participants completed the PROs. The mean age was 68, 60% were male, and 94% were white. The median time from MM diagnosis to the baseline survey completion was 6 years. The mean COST score was 29 (SD=10) and 37% of the patients were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity. Younger patients (P < .01) and those residing in areas with lower median household incomes (P = .01) were more likely to be experiencing financial toxicity. Participants experiencing financial toxicity reported lower satisfaction with their therapy, with a mean CTSQ score 6.7 points lower than those without (P < .01). A subset of patients (n = 75) completed a second COST survey approximately 1 year later. Financial toxicity status was relatively stable; 67% (18/27) of patients experiencing it at baseline were still at the later time point and only 10% (5/48) of patients previously not experiencing financial toxicity were at the later time point.
Conclusion: Over one-third of patients with MM were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity and financial toxicity was associated with reduced satisfaction with MM treatment.
{"title":"Financial Toxicity and Satisfaction With Cancer Treatment Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of the MMRF's CureCloud Initiative.","authors":"Mark A Fiala, Eva Lepisto, Chioma Amadi-Mgbenka, Jessica Schulman, George Mulligan, Hearn Jay Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored financial toxicity and its association with treatment satisfaction among a longitudinal cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The multiple myeloma research foundation (MMRF) CureCloud initiative (NCT03657251) is an observational study which collects biospecimens, clinical data, and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Participants completed the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) and the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the initial time point, 214 participants completed the PROs. The mean age was 68, 60% were male, and 94% were white. The median time from MM diagnosis to the baseline survey completion was 6 years. The mean COST score was 29 (SD=10) and 37% of the patients were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity. Younger patients (P < .01) and those residing in areas with lower median household incomes (P = .01) were more likely to be experiencing financial toxicity. Participants experiencing financial toxicity reported lower satisfaction with their therapy, with a mean CTSQ score 6.7 points lower than those without (P < .01). A subset of patients (n = 75) completed a second COST survey approximately 1 year later. Financial toxicity status was relatively stable; 67% (18/27) of patients experiencing it at baseline were still at the later time point and only 10% (5/48) of patients previously not experiencing financial toxicity were at the later time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over one-third of patients with MM were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity and financial toxicity was associated with reduced satisfaction with MM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145437702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-05DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.003
Matthew J Rees, Timothy T Xu, Suheil Albert Atallah-Yunes, Kenneth J C Lim, Sikander Ailawadhi, Ricardo Parrondo, Rafael Fonseca, Peter Leif Bergsagel, Suzanne Hayman, Angela Dispenzieri, Francis Buadi, David Dingli, Rahma Warsame, Prashant Kapoor, Jithma P Abeykoon, Morie A Gertz, Eli Muchtar, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Wilson Gonsalves, S Vincent Rajkumar, Sanjay V Patel, Shaji Kumar
Introduction: Uptake of BCMA-directed antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in multiple myeloma has been hindered by ocular side-effects. Belantamab mafodotin (BelMaf) and MEDI2228 are BCMA-directed monoclonal-antibodies conjugated to the microtubule inhibitor, monomethyl auristatin F and the alkylator, pyrrolobenzodiazepine, respectively. Differences in ADC payload, antibody specificity and linker stability influence ocular toxicity.
Aim/methods: We investigated the tolerability and ocular toxicity profiles of BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Retrospective study of 111 patients treated with BCMA-directed ADCs between 2019 and 2022.
Results: Eighty-seven percent of patients were triple-class refractory, 50% penta-class refractory, 14% had prior BCMA-directed therapy and 24% extraosseous disease. Treatments included BelMaf monotherapy (n = 56), BelMaf combination therapy (n = 12) and MEDI2228 monotherapy (n = 43). The overall response rate was 30% for BelMaf and 44% for MEDI2228. Photophobia was more common with MEDI2228 (any-grade: 12% vs. 49%, P < .001), whereas keratopathy was more common with BelMaf (any-grade: 59% vs. 9%, P = .002). Four MEDI2228 recipients developed keratopathy, all grade 1 and associated with dry eyes and/or photophobia. Dose delay for ocular toxicity was comparable for BelMaf and MEDI2228 (28% vs. 19%, P = 0.2), as was the rate of dose reduction (18% vs. 12%, P = .4). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progression/death (BelMaf = 71%, MEDI2228 = 44%) and ocular toxicity (BelMaf = 18%, MEDI2228 = 30%).
Conclusions: Treatment interruptions, dose reductions and drug discontinuation are common with BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Research to optimize the administration schedule of these agents is warranted. BelMaf and MEDI2228 produce distinct patterns of ocular side-effects, namely keratopathy and reduced visual-acuity with the former, and photophobia and dry eyes with the latter.
{"title":"Dose Delays and Treatment Interruptions Secondary to Ocular Toxicity From BCMA-Directed Antibody Drug Conjugate Therapy in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Matthew J Rees, Timothy T Xu, Suheil Albert Atallah-Yunes, Kenneth J C Lim, Sikander Ailawadhi, Ricardo Parrondo, Rafael Fonseca, Peter Leif Bergsagel, Suzanne Hayman, Angela Dispenzieri, Francis Buadi, David Dingli, Rahma Warsame, Prashant Kapoor, Jithma P Abeykoon, Morie A Gertz, Eli Muchtar, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Wilson Gonsalves, S Vincent Rajkumar, Sanjay V Patel, Shaji Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Uptake of BCMA-directed antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in multiple myeloma has been hindered by ocular side-effects. Belantamab mafodotin (BelMaf) and MEDI2228 are BCMA-directed monoclonal-antibodies conjugated to the microtubule inhibitor, monomethyl auristatin F and the alkylator, pyrrolobenzodiazepine, respectively. Differences in ADC payload, antibody specificity and linker stability influence ocular toxicity.</p><p><strong>Aim/methods: </strong>We investigated the tolerability and ocular toxicity profiles of BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Retrospective study of 111 patients treated with BCMA-directed ADCs between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven percent of patients were triple-class refractory, 50% penta-class refractory, 14% had prior BCMA-directed therapy and 24% extraosseous disease. Treatments included BelMaf monotherapy (n = 56), BelMaf combination therapy (n = 12) and MEDI2228 monotherapy (n = 43). The overall response rate was 30% for BelMaf and 44% for MEDI2228. Photophobia was more common with MEDI2228 (any-grade: 12% vs. 49%, P < .001), whereas keratopathy was more common with BelMaf (any-grade: 59% vs. 9%, P = .002). Four MEDI2228 recipients developed keratopathy, all grade 1 and associated with dry eyes and/or photophobia. Dose delay for ocular toxicity was comparable for BelMaf and MEDI2228 (28% vs. 19%, P = 0.2), as was the rate of dose reduction (18% vs. 12%, P = .4). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progression/death (BelMaf = 71%, MEDI2228 = 44%) and ocular toxicity (BelMaf = 18%, MEDI2228 = 30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment interruptions, dose reductions and drug discontinuation are common with BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Research to optimize the administration schedule of these agents is warranted. BelMaf and MEDI2228 produce distinct patterns of ocular side-effects, namely keratopathy and reduced visual-acuity with the former, and photophobia and dry eyes with the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145399548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}