首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia最新文献

英文 中文
Maintenance Rituximab Following Rituximab Induction for Follicular Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience. 利妥昔单抗诱导后维持滤泡性淋巴瘤:单中心经验。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.011
Lukas L Lauer, Craig A Portell

Introduction: Follicular lymphoma typically affects patients in their fifth, sixth, and seventh decades of life and carries a median survival of 10 years. Rituximab induction followed by maintenance has been increasingly used in follicular lymphoma for patients with low tumor burden progression who wish to receive treatment but want to avoid the side effect profile of chemotherapy. Data on the efficacy of this course is limited for patients previously treated with rituximab as well as those with intermediate risk disease. Here we present data from a single center on the efficacy of induction and maintenance rituximab in a cohort with a mix of intermediate and low risk patients.

Patients and methods: 26 patients with FL underwent a course of induction rituximab followed by maintenance from 2007 to 2024. 15% were bulky by GELF, 27% were high risk by FLIPI, and 35% had received prior treatment with all but one of the previously treated patients having received rituximab.

Results: Estimated median 2 year PFS was 71%, TTNT was 68%, and OS was 88%. Median follow up time was 1.72 years. Eight patients deepened their response during maintenance to a CR.

Conclusion: In this study, intermediate and low risk FL patients responded well to induction rituximab followed by maintenance with survival comparable to past studies of higher risk patients. This study provides evidence that even those patients previously treated with rituximab can benefit from retreatment rituximab with maintenance.

简介:滤泡性淋巴瘤通常影响患者在其生命的第五,第六和第七十年,并携带10年的中位生存期。利妥昔单抗诱导后维持已越来越多地用于滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,这些患者希望接受治疗,但希望避免化疗的副作用。对于先前接受过利妥昔单抗治疗的患者以及患有中度风险疾病的患者,该疗程的疗效数据有限。在这里,我们提供了来自单一中心的数据,该数据是关于在中危和低危患者混合的队列中诱导和维持利妥昔单抗的疗效。患者和方法:2007年至2024年,26例FL患者接受了一个疗程的利妥昔单抗诱导和维持治疗。15%的患者在GELF中体积较大,27%的患者在FLIPI中风险较高,35%的患者之前接受过治疗,除一人外,所有先前接受过利妥昔单抗治疗。结果:估计中位2年PFS为71%,TTNT为68%,OS为88%。中位随访时间为1.72年。结论:在本研究中,中低风险FL患者对诱导利妥昔单抗的反应良好,随后维持的生存率与过去对高风险患者的研究相当。这项研究提供的证据表明,即使那些以前接受过利妥昔单抗治疗的患者也可以从再治疗利妥昔单抗并维持治疗中获益。
{"title":"Maintenance Rituximab Following Rituximab Induction for Follicular Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Lukas L Lauer, Craig A Portell","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Follicular lymphoma typically affects patients in their fifth, sixth, and seventh decades of life and carries a median survival of 10 years. Rituximab induction followed by maintenance has been increasingly used in follicular lymphoma for patients with low tumor burden progression who wish to receive treatment but want to avoid the side effect profile of chemotherapy. Data on the efficacy of this course is limited for patients previously treated with rituximab as well as those with intermediate risk disease. Here we present data from a single center on the efficacy of induction and maintenance rituximab in a cohort with a mix of intermediate and low risk patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>26 patients with FL underwent a course of induction rituximab followed by maintenance from 2007 to 2024. 15% were bulky by GELF, 27% were high risk by FLIPI, and 35% had received prior treatment with all but one of the previously treated patients having received rituximab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated median 2 year PFS was 71%, TTNT was 68%, and OS was 88%. Median follow up time was 1.72 years. Eight patients deepened their response during maintenance to a CR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, intermediate and low risk FL patients responded well to induction rituximab followed by maintenance with survival comparable to past studies of higher risk patients. This study provides evidence that even those patients previously treated with rituximab can benefit from retreatment rituximab with maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145457859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epcoritamab Plus Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus Rituximab Plus Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Transplant-Ineligible Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Match-Adjusted Comparative Analysis. 艾可利他单抗联合吉西他滨和奥沙利铂与利妥昔单抗联合吉西他滨和奥沙利铂治疗不适合移植的复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤:一项匹配校正的比较分析
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.010
Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Andrew Ip, Justin M Darrah, Tongsheng Wang, Guihua Zhang, Alex Mutebi, Tychell Branchcomb, Zhijie Ding, Anindit Chhibber, Fernando Rivas Navarro, Malene Risum, Mohammad Atiya, Samantha Brodkin, Anthony Wang, Abualbishr Alshreef, Diala Harb, Mariana Sacchi, Daniela Hoehn, Yasmin H Karimi

Background: This indirect treatment comparison evaluated epcoritamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Epcor+GemOx) versus rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods: Individual patient data (IPD) for Epcor+GemOx from EPCORE NHL-2 Arm 5 (NCT04663347) were compared with clinical practice data for patients treated with R-GemOx using 2 methodologies: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using published aggregate data from clinical sites in France (Cazelles et al. Lymphoma. 2021;62:2161) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using IPD from the US-based COTA database (COTA Healthcare). Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: In the MAIC, after adjustment, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (86.8% vs 38.3%; relative risk [RR], 2.27 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-2.93]; P < .0001) and CR rate (71.2% vs 32.7%; RR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.61-2.96]; P < .0001). Median PFS was 26.7 versus 4.8 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.67]; P < .001); median OS was not reached with Epcor+GemOx versus 10.0 months with R-GemOx (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29-1.00]; P = .05). In the IPTW, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (88.5% vs 35.6%; RR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.80-3.43]; P < .0001), CR rate (63.9% vs 10.2%; RR, 6.25 [95% CI, 3.08-12.68]; P < .0001), median PFS (11.2 vs 2.4 months; HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.15-0.36]; P < .001), and median OS (21.6 vs 8.3 months; HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30-0.74]; P = .002).

Conclusion: Epcor+GemOx provides significantly greater response rates and survival outcomes compared with R-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL.

背景:这项间接治疗比较评估了依可利他单抗联合吉西他滨和奥沙利铂(Epcor+GemOx)与利妥昔单抗(R)-GemOx对不适合移植的复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的治疗效果。方法:EPCORE nll -2 Arm 5 (NCT04663347)的Epcor+GemOx的个体患者数据(IPD)与接受R-GemOx治疗的患者的临床实践数据使用两种方法进行比较:匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)使用来自法国临床站点的已发表的汇总数据(Cazelles等);淋巴瘤。2021;62:2161)和使用来自美国COTA数据库(COTA Healthcare)的IPD的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)。结果包括客观缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解率(CR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:在MAIC中,调整后Epcor+GemOx与R-GemOx的ORR显著高于前者(86.8% vs 38.3%),相对危险度[RR]为2.27[95%可信区间(CI), 1.76 ~ 2.93];P < 0.0001)和CR率(71.2% vs 32.7%; RR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.61 ~ 2.96]; P < 0.0001)。中位PFS为26.7 vs 4.8个月(风险比[HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.67]; P < .001);Epcor+GemOx组未达到中位总生存期,而R-GemOx组为10.0个月(HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29-1.00]; P = 0.05)。在IPTW中,Epcor+GemOx与R-GemOx的ORR (88.5% vs 35.6%; RR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.80-3.43]; P < 0.0001)、CR率(63.9% vs 10.2%; RR, 6.25 [95% CI, 3.08-12.68]; P < 0.0001)、中位PFS (11.2 vs 2.4个月;HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.15-0.36]; P < 0.001)和中位OS (21.6 vs 8.3个月;HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30-0.74]; P = 0.002)显著高于R-GemOx。结论:与R-GemOx相比,Epcor+GemOx在移植不合格的R/R DLBCL患者中提供了显着更高的缓解率和生存结果。
{"title":"Epcoritamab Plus Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus Rituximab Plus Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Transplant-Ineligible Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Match-Adjusted Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Andrew Ip, Justin M Darrah, Tongsheng Wang, Guihua Zhang, Alex Mutebi, Tychell Branchcomb, Zhijie Ding, Anindit Chhibber, Fernando Rivas Navarro, Malene Risum, Mohammad Atiya, Samantha Brodkin, Anthony Wang, Abualbishr Alshreef, Diala Harb, Mariana Sacchi, Daniela Hoehn, Yasmin H Karimi","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This indirect treatment comparison evaluated epcoritamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Epcor+GemOx) versus rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual patient data (IPD) for Epcor+GemOx from EPCORE NHL-2 Arm 5 (NCT04663347) were compared with clinical practice data for patients treated with R-GemOx using 2 methodologies: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using published aggregate data from clinical sites in France (Cazelles et al. Lymphoma. 2021;62:2161) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using IPD from the US-based COTA database (COTA Healthcare). Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the MAIC, after adjustment, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (86.8% vs 38.3%; relative risk [RR], 2.27 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-2.93]; P < .0001) and CR rate (71.2% vs 32.7%; RR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.61-2.96]; P < .0001). Median PFS was 26.7 versus 4.8 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22-0.67]; P < .001); median OS was not reached with Epcor+GemOx versus 10.0 months with R-GemOx (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29-1.00]; P = .05). In the IPTW, Epcor+GemOx versus R-GemOx had significantly higher ORR (88.5% vs 35.6%; RR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.80-3.43]; P < .0001), CR rate (63.9% vs 10.2%; RR, 6.25 [95% CI, 3.08-12.68]; P < .0001), median PFS (11.2 vs 2.4 months; HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.15-0.36]; P < .001), and median OS (21.6 vs 8.3 months; HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30-0.74]; P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epcor+GemOx provides significantly greater response rates and survival outcomes compared with R-GemOx in patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breast Cancer Risk After Chest Radiotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: A Comprehensive Overview. 霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者胸部放疗后乳腺癌风险:综合综述。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.009
Amanda Caruso, Filomena Emanuela Laddaga, Alba Fiorentino, Angela Maria Moramarco, Flavia Carbone, Clorinda Maria Luisa Derosa, Stefano Martinotti, Francesco Gaudio

Secondary breast cancer (SBC) is emerging as the most frequent solid tumour in female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with chest radiotherapy (RT). Women irradiated with ≥10 Gy before the age of 30 accumulate risks that rival those carried by BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with excess cases appearing ∼8 years after RT and persisting lifelong. This review weaves together epidemiological data, mechanistic evidence and clinical studies to elucidate how radiation dose and field, age at exposure, systemic regimens, host genomics and micro-environmental factors interact to drive SBC. Radiation-associated tumours display a distinctive profile-earlier onset, frequent bilaterality-posing unique therapeutic and prognostic challenges. We discuss current surveillance recommendations of annual mammography plus breast MRI from age 25 (or 8 years post-RT) and examine preventive strategies ranging from RT de-escalation and cardioprotective chemotherapy to lifestyle modification and selective chemoprevention. Finally, we highlight emerging imaging and molecular biomarkers-most notably MRI background parenchymal enhancement and polygenic risk scores-that may enable a shift from 1-size-fits-all follow-up to precision survivorship care.

继发性乳腺癌(SBC)正在成为女性霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)胸部放射治疗(RT)幸存者中最常见的实体肿瘤。30岁前接受≥10 Gy辐射的女性累积的风险与BRCA1/2突变携带者的风险相当,过量病例在放疗后8年出现,并持续终生。这篇综述将流行病学数据、机制证据和临床研究结合在一起,阐明辐射剂量和场、暴露年龄、全身方案、宿主基因组学和微环境因素如何相互作用来驱动SBC。放射相关肿瘤表现出独特的特征——发病早、双侧多发——这给治疗和预后带来了独特的挑战。我们讨论了目前从25岁(或放疗后8年)开始的年度乳房x光检查和乳房MRI的监测建议,并研究了从放疗降级和心脏保护化疗到生活方式改变和选择性化疗预防的预防策略。最后,我们强调了新兴的成像和分子生物标志物——最显著的是MRI背景脑本质增强和多基因风险评分——可能使从一刀切的随访转向精确的生存护理。
{"title":"Breast Cancer Risk After Chest Radiotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: A Comprehensive Overview.","authors":"Amanda Caruso, Filomena Emanuela Laddaga, Alba Fiorentino, Angela Maria Moramarco, Flavia Carbone, Clorinda Maria Luisa Derosa, Stefano Martinotti, Francesco Gaudio","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Secondary breast cancer (SBC) is emerging as the most frequent solid tumour in female survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with chest radiotherapy (RT). Women irradiated with ≥10 Gy before the age of 30 accumulate risks that rival those carried by BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with excess cases appearing ∼8 years after RT and persisting lifelong. This review weaves together epidemiological data, mechanistic evidence and clinical studies to elucidate how radiation dose and field, age at exposure, systemic regimens, host genomics and micro-environmental factors interact to drive SBC. Radiation-associated tumours display a distinctive profile-earlier onset, frequent bilaterality-posing unique therapeutic and prognostic challenges. We discuss current surveillance recommendations of annual mammography plus breast MRI from age 25 (or 8 years post-RT) and examine preventive strategies ranging from RT de-escalation and cardioprotective chemotherapy to lifestyle modification and selective chemoprevention. Finally, we highlight emerging imaging and molecular biomarkers-most notably MRI background parenchymal enhancement and polygenic risk scores-that may enable a shift from 1-size-fits-all follow-up to precision survivorship care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145457854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With Concurrent or Previous Solid Tumor History. 合并或既往实体瘤病史的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者的预后。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.006
Yaşa Gül Mutlu, Şerife Emre Ünsal, Buse Güleç, İstemi Serin, Eren Arslan Davulcu, Gülçin Miyase Sönmez, Serkan Güven, Süreyya Yiğit Kaya, Senem Maral, Muzaffer Keklik, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Tugba Cetintepe, Güldane Cengiz Seval, Ömür Gökmen Sevindik

Introduction: The coexistence of solid tumors and multiple myeloma (MM) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; however, data on clinical outcomes in this population remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who had synchronous or prior solid tumor malignancies.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 NDMM patients with a documented history of solid tumor, classified as either concurrent (diagnosed within 6 months) or prior. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to the timing of solid tumor diagnosis.

Results: The median age was 66 years, with a male predominance (58.5%). Breast (24.4%), lung (17.1%), colon, and prostate cancers (9.8% each) were the most common solid tumors. Extramedullary disease was observed only in the synchronous group (100% vs. 0%). Autologous transplantation was performed significantly less frequently in the synchronous group (26.3% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.041). Lenalidomide maintenance therapy was underutilized in patients with synchronous malignancies, reflecting possible clinical hesitation. Myeloma-related mortality occurred in 17.1% of patients, with a median overall survival of 48 months (range: 16-80), and no significant survival difference between synchronous and patient with prior solid tumor history group.

Conclusion: The presence of synchronous solid tumors in NDMM patients is associated with a higher rate of extramedullary disease and may influence clinical decision-making, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management and individualized treatment strategies. Furthermore, extramedullary involvement in MM should prompt evaluation for a potential coexisting solid malignancy.

实体瘤和多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的共存给诊断和治疗带来了挑战;然而,这一人群的临床结果数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估伴有同步或既往实体肿瘤恶性肿瘤的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的临床特征和生存结局。方法:回顾性分析41例有实体瘤病史的NDMM患者,分为并发(6个月内诊断)和既往。评估临床特征、治疗模式和结果。根据实体瘤诊断时间对患者进行分层。结果:中位年龄66岁,男性占58.5%。乳腺癌(24.4%)、肺癌(17.1%)、结肠癌和前列腺癌(各9.8%)是最常见的实体肿瘤。仅在同步组观察到髓外疾病(100% vs 0%)。同步组自体移植的发生率明显低于对照组(26.3% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.041)。来那度胺维持治疗在同步恶性肿瘤患者中的应用不足,反映了可能的临床犹豫。骨髓瘤相关死亡率为17.1%,中位总生存期为48个月(范围:16-80),同步组和既往有实体瘤病史组的生存期无显著差异。结论:NDMM患者同时存在实体瘤与较高的髓外病变发生率相关,并可能影响临床决策,强调需要多学科管理和个性化治疗策略。此外,MM的髓外受累应提示评估潜在的共存实体恶性肿瘤。
{"title":"The Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With Concurrent or Previous Solid Tumor History.","authors":"Yaşa Gül Mutlu, Şerife Emre Ünsal, Buse Güleç, İstemi Serin, Eren Arslan Davulcu, Gülçin Miyase Sönmez, Serkan Güven, Süreyya Yiğit Kaya, Senem Maral, Muzaffer Keklik, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Tugba Cetintepe, Güldane Cengiz Seval, Ömür Gökmen Sevindik","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The coexistence of solid tumors and multiple myeloma (MM) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; however, data on clinical outcomes in this population remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who had synchronous or prior solid tumor malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 NDMM patients with a documented history of solid tumor, classified as either concurrent (diagnosed within 6 months) or prior. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to the timing of solid tumor diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 66 years, with a male predominance (58.5%). Breast (24.4%), lung (17.1%), colon, and prostate cancers (9.8% each) were the most common solid tumors. Extramedullary disease was observed only in the synchronous group (100% vs. 0%). Autologous transplantation was performed significantly less frequently in the synchronous group (26.3% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.041). Lenalidomide maintenance therapy was underutilized in patients with synchronous malignancies, reflecting possible clinical hesitation. Myeloma-related mortality occurred in 17.1% of patients, with a median overall survival of 48 months (range: 16-80), and no significant survival difference between synchronous and patient with prior solid tumor history group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of synchronous solid tumors in NDMM patients is associated with a higher rate of extramedullary disease and may influence clinical decision-making, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management and individualized treatment strategies. Furthermore, extramedullary involvement in MM should prompt evaluation for a potential coexisting solid malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspectives on Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies use in Multiple Myeloma-Experience from Asian Countries. 抗bcma双特异性抗体在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用——来自亚洲国家的经验。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.005
Cinnie Soekojo, Shimin Jasmine Chung, Ming-Tao Tsai, Wenming Chen, Jeffrey Huang, Jin Seok Kim, Dong-Gun Lee, Chang Ki Min, Kazuhito Suzuki, Subramanian Swaminathan, Hiroyuki Takamatsu, Daryl Tan, Uday Yanamandra, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Wee Joo Chng

Background: The management of relapsed / refractory myeloma particularly those who are heavily pretreated and penta-refractory has experienced a paradigm change with the advent of bispecific antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), offering new hope for these patients. The diverse experiences in the use of bispecific antibodies across Asian countries/regions underscore the complexities of integrating these therapies into clinical practice. With limited availability and varying access through clinical trials, compassionate access programmes and early commercial use, these agents are demonstrating impressive efficacy, yet present unique challenges in widespread adoption of these agents.

Methods: A roundtable discussion among myeloma experts from Asia has highlighted consistent efficacy but also raised concerns about the durability of response and the management of associated toxicities and infections.

Results: These discussions emphasize the need for ongoing research to better understand the nuances of treatment sequencing and patient selection.

Conclusions: The insights gained will contribute to developing strategic frameworks and consensus guidelines that can effectively guide clinicians in optimizing outcomes for myeloma patients in diverse healthcare settings.

背景:随着针对b细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)的双特异性抗体的出现,复发/难治性骨髓瘤的治疗,特别是那些经过大量预处理和五期难治性骨髓瘤的治疗经历了范式变化,为这些患者带来了新的希望。亚洲国家/地区在使用双特异性抗体方面的不同经验强调了将这些疗法纳入临床实践的复杂性。由于这些药物的可用性有限,并且通过临床试验、慈悲获取规划和早期商业使用可获得性不同,这些药物显示出令人印象深刻的疗效,但在广泛采用这些药物方面存在独特的挑战。方法:来自亚洲的骨髓瘤专家的圆桌讨论强调了一致的疗效,但也提出了对反应持久性和相关毒性和感染管理的担忧。结果:这些讨论强调需要进行持续的研究,以更好地了解治疗顺序和患者选择的细微差别。结论:所获得的见解将有助于制定战略框架和共识指南,可以有效地指导临床医生在不同的医疗保健环境中优化骨髓瘤患者的结果。
{"title":"Perspectives on Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies use in Multiple Myeloma-Experience from Asian Countries.","authors":"Cinnie Soekojo, Shimin Jasmine Chung, Ming-Tao Tsai, Wenming Chen, Jeffrey Huang, Jin Seok Kim, Dong-Gun Lee, Chang Ki Min, Kazuhito Suzuki, Subramanian Swaminathan, Hiroyuki Takamatsu, Daryl Tan, Uday Yanamandra, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Wee Joo Chng","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of relapsed / refractory myeloma particularly those who are heavily pretreated and penta-refractory has experienced a paradigm change with the advent of bispecific antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), offering new hope for these patients. The diverse experiences in the use of bispecific antibodies across Asian countries/regions underscore the complexities of integrating these therapies into clinical practice. With limited availability and varying access through clinical trials, compassionate access programmes and early commercial use, these agents are demonstrating impressive efficacy, yet present unique challenges in widespread adoption of these agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A roundtable discussion among myeloma experts from Asia has highlighted consistent efficacy but also raised concerns about the durability of response and the management of associated toxicities and infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These discussions emphasize the need for ongoing research to better understand the nuances of treatment sequencing and patient selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The insights gained will contribute to developing strategic frameworks and consensus guidelines that can effectively guide clinicians in optimizing outcomes for myeloma patients in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145476676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pregnancy-Related Adverse Events with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Use in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A FAERS Pharmacovigilance Analysis (2001-2024). 使用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗慢性髓性白血病的妊娠相关不良事件:FAERS药物警戒分析(2001-2024)。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.002
Muhammad Salman Faisal, Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Aleenah Mohsin, Husnain Mushtaq, Wania Ur Rehman, Mashhood Ur Rehman, Haseeba Javed, Fizza Mohsin, Muhammad Talha Shaukat, Bibi Maryam, Mohammad Ammar Al Osama, Salman Fazal

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are essential therapies for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), yet their safety during pregnancy remains poorly characterized. We aimed to address this gap by providing pharmacovigilance data using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of pregnancy-related adverse events (AEs) reported to FAERS between January 2001 and December 2024. Reports involving female patients exposed to imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, bosutinib, or asciminib were extracted. Pregnancy-related AEs were categorized into maternal and fetal outcomes and presented descriptively. Disproportionality analyses were also performed for 2022-2024 to determine only the more relevant AEs in contemporary clinical practice. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to quantify associations.

Results: A total of 651 relevant pregnancy-related AEs were identified between 2001 and 2024, with imatinib accounting for the majority (n = 450), followed by nilotinib (n = 118), dasatinib (n = 64), ponatinib (n = 13), bosutinib (n = 4), and asciminib (n = 2). The most frequently reported maternal AEs were abortion (40.6%) and polyhydramnios (4.3%), while the most frequent perinatal complications included premature delivery (33.6%) and low birth weight (4.4%). In the disproportionality analysis (2022-2024), imatinib was significantly associated with pregnancy-related AEs (ROR 3.47; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05).

Conclusion: This pharmacovigilance analysis suggests a signal of pregnancy-related adverse events with imatinib, while evidence for other TKIs remains limited. Given the paucity of data, results should be interpreted with caution. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

背景:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)是慢性髓性白血病(CML)的重要治疗药物,但其在妊娠期间的安全性仍不清楚。我们的目标是通过使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)提供药物警戒数据来解决这一差距。方法:我们对2001年1月至2024年12月FAERS报告的妊娠相关不良事件(ae)进行了全面的药物警戒分析。提取了暴露于伊马替尼、达沙替尼、尼洛替尼、波纳替尼、博舒替尼或阿西米尼的女性患者的报告。与妊娠相关的ae分为母体和胎儿结局,并进行描述性描述。还对2022-2024年进行了歧化分析,以确定当代临床实践中更相关的ae。报告优势比(RORs)和95%可信区间(CI)用于量化相关性。结果:2001 - 2024年共发现651例与妊娠相关的ae,其中伊马替尼占多数(n = 450),其次是尼洛替尼(n = 118)、达沙替尼(n = 64)、波纳替尼(n = 13)、博舒替尼(n = 4)和阿西米尼(n = 2)。最常见的母体ae是流产(40.6%)和羊水过多(4.3%),而最常见的围产期并发症包括早产(33.6%)和低出生体重(4.4%)。在歧化分析(2022-2024)中,伊马替尼与妊娠相关ae显著相关(ROR 3.47; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05)。结论:该药物警戒分析提示伊马替尼有妊娠相关不良事件的信号,而其他TKIs的证据仍然有限。由于缺乏数据,对结果的解释应谨慎。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。
{"title":"Pregnancy-Related Adverse Events with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Use in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A FAERS Pharmacovigilance Analysis (2001-2024).","authors":"Muhammad Salman Faisal, Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Aleenah Mohsin, Husnain Mushtaq, Wania Ur Rehman, Mashhood Ur Rehman, Haseeba Javed, Fizza Mohsin, Muhammad Talha Shaukat, Bibi Maryam, Mohammad Ammar Al Osama, Salman Fazal","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are essential therapies for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), yet their safety during pregnancy remains poorly characterized. We aimed to address this gap by providing pharmacovigilance data using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of pregnancy-related adverse events (AEs) reported to FAERS between January 2001 and December 2024. Reports involving female patients exposed to imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, bosutinib, or asciminib were extracted. Pregnancy-related AEs were categorized into maternal and fetal outcomes and presented descriptively. Disproportionality analyses were also performed for 2022-2024 to determine only the more relevant AEs in contemporary clinical practice. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to quantify associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 651 relevant pregnancy-related AEs were identified between 2001 and 2024, with imatinib accounting for the majority (n = 450), followed by nilotinib (n = 118), dasatinib (n = 64), ponatinib (n = 13), bosutinib (n = 4), and asciminib (n = 2). The most frequently reported maternal AEs were abortion (40.6%) and polyhydramnios (4.3%), while the most frequent perinatal complications included premature delivery (33.6%) and low birth weight (4.4%). In the disproportionality analysis (2022-2024), imatinib was significantly associated with pregnancy-related AEs (ROR 3.47; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pharmacovigilance analysis suggests a signal of pregnancy-related adverse events with imatinib, while evidence for other TKIs remains limited. Given the paucity of data, results should be interpreted with caution. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of PREVEMM: A Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients. preemm的发展:新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评分。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.008
Inés Martínez-Alfonzo, Diego Velasco-Rodríguez, Pablo Mínguez-Paniagua, Ignacio Mahillo-Fernández, Laura Fernández-Cuezva, Alberto Velasco-Valdazo, Rosa Vidal-Laso, Cristina Fernández Maqueda, Sara Martín-Herrero, Nuria Revilla, Ana Camila González-Teomiro, María Civeira-Marín, Elena Prieto, Amalia Domingo-González, Carlos Soto, Jose M Calvo-Villas, Elham Askari, Pilar Llamas-Sillero, Juana Serrano-López

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important complication in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), particularly during the first year after diagnosis. Existing risk assessment models show limited predictive accuracy. This study developed a novel risk scoring system using complementary approaches to improve VTE risk prediction in NDMM.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 225 NDMM patients from 4 hospitals (2014-2019) to develop a prediction score for first-year VTE. The model was built using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization with variables showing P < .25 in univariate analysis. Performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED scores were calculated for comparison.

Results: Among 225 patients (median age 68 years), 32 (14%) developed VTE, predominantly pulmonary embolism (71%) within the first year after diagnosis. The LASSO model had a c-statistic of 0.86 and identified ECOG ≥ 1, high R-ISS stage, high-dose dexamethasone (> 160 mg per cycle), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 370 IU/L, immunoparesis, spinal cord compression, and paralysis as independent predictors (AUC: 0.86). LASSO-derived PREVEMM score significantly outperformed existing tools (AUC: 0.88 vs 0.61 for both IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED).

Conclusion: PREVEMM score demonstrates superior VTE risk stratification capabilities, supporting its potential clinical utility for individualized thromboprophylaxis in NDMM.

背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)的一个重要并发症,特别是在诊断后的第一年。现有的风险评估模型显示出有限的预测准确性。本研究开发了一种新的风险评分系统,使用互补方法来改善NDMM的静脉血栓栓塞风险预测。方法:我们回顾性分析了来自4家医院(2014-2019)的225例NDMM患者,以建立第一年静脉血栓栓塞的预测评分。模型使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)正则化建立,单变量分析中变量P < .25。使用曲线下面积(AUC)和Hosmer-Lemeshow测验评估性能。计算IMPEDE-VTE和SAVED评分进行比较。结果:225例患者(中位年龄68岁)中,32例(14%)在诊断后一年内发生静脉血栓栓塞,主要是肺栓塞(71%)。LASSO模型的c统计量为0.86,ECOG≥1,高R-ISS分期,高剂量地塞米松(> 160 mg /周期),乳酸脱氢酶(LDH) > 370 IU/L,免疫麻痹,脊髓压迫和瘫痪作为独立预测因子(AUC: 0.86)。lasso衍生的PREVEMM评分明显优于现有工具(AUC: 0.88 vs 0.61)。结论:PREVEMM评分显示了优越的静脉血栓栓塞风险分层能力,支持其在NDMM个体化血栓预防的潜在临床应用。
{"title":"Development of PREVEMM: A Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients.","authors":"Inés Martínez-Alfonzo, Diego Velasco-Rodríguez, Pablo Mínguez-Paniagua, Ignacio Mahillo-Fernández, Laura Fernández-Cuezva, Alberto Velasco-Valdazo, Rosa Vidal-Laso, Cristina Fernández Maqueda, Sara Martín-Herrero, Nuria Revilla, Ana Camila González-Teomiro, María Civeira-Marín, Elena Prieto, Amalia Domingo-González, Carlos Soto, Jose M Calvo-Villas, Elham Askari, Pilar Llamas-Sillero, Juana Serrano-López","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important complication in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), particularly during the first year after diagnosis. Existing risk assessment models show limited predictive accuracy. This study developed a novel risk scoring system using complementary approaches to improve VTE risk prediction in NDMM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 225 NDMM patients from 4 hospitals (2014-2019) to develop a prediction score for first-year VTE. The model was built using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization with variables showing P < .25 in univariate analysis. Performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED scores were calculated for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 225 patients (median age 68 years), 32 (14%) developed VTE, predominantly pulmonary embolism (71%) within the first year after diagnosis. The LASSO model had a c-statistic of 0.86 and identified ECOG ≥ 1, high R-ISS stage, high-dose dexamethasone (> 160 mg per cycle), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 370 IU/L, immunoparesis, spinal cord compression, and paralysis as independent predictors (AUC: 0.86). LASSO-derived PREVEMM score significantly outperformed existing tools (AUC: 0.88 vs 0.61 for both IMPEDE-VTE and SAVED).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PREVEMM score demonstrates superior VTE risk stratification capabilities, supporting its potential clinical utility for individualized thromboprophylaxis in NDMM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transdifferentiation From Multiple Myeloma to Myeloid Sarcoma in the Setting of CAR T-Cell Therapy. CAR - t细胞治疗下多发性骨髓瘤向髓系肉瘤的转分化。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.013
Diana Cirstea, Kathleen Gallagher, Maxx King, Paola Dal Cin, Mark J Sloan, Marcela V Maus, Noopur Raje, Matthew Frigault, Valentina Nardi
{"title":"Transdifferentiation From Multiple Myeloma to Myeloid Sarcoma in the Setting of CAR T-Cell Therapy.","authors":"Diana Cirstea, Kathleen Gallagher, Maxx King, Paola Dal Cin, Mark J Sloan, Marcela V Maus, Noopur Raje, Matthew Frigault, Valentina Nardi","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.09.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Financial Toxicity and Satisfaction With Cancer Treatment Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of the MMRF's CureCloud Initiative. 多发性骨髓瘤患者的财务毒性和癌症治疗满意度:MMRF的CureCloud计划的分析。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.007
Mark A Fiala, Eva Lepisto, Chioma Amadi-Mgbenka, Jessica Schulman, George Mulligan, Hearn Jay Cho

Background: This study explored financial toxicity and its association with treatment satisfaction among a longitudinal cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Patients and methods: The multiple myeloma research foundation (MMRF) CureCloud initiative (NCT03657251) is an observational study which collects biospecimens, clinical data, and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Participants completed the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) and the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ).

Results: At the initial time point, 214 participants completed the PROs. The mean age was 68, 60% were male, and 94% were white. The median time from MM diagnosis to the baseline survey completion was 6 years. The mean COST score was 29 (SD=10) and 37% of the patients were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity. Younger patients (P < .01) and those residing in areas with lower median household incomes (P = .01) were more likely to be experiencing financial toxicity. Participants experiencing financial toxicity reported lower satisfaction with their therapy, with a mean CTSQ score 6.7 points lower than those without (P < .01). A subset of patients (n = 75) completed a second COST survey approximately 1 year later. Financial toxicity status was relatively stable; 67% (18/27) of patients experiencing it at baseline were still at the later time point and only 10% (5/48) of patients previously not experiencing financial toxicity were at the later time point.

Conclusion: Over one-third of patients with MM were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity and financial toxicity was associated with reduced satisfaction with MM treatment.

背景:本研究探讨了多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者纵向队列的财务毒性及其与治疗满意度的关系。患者和方法:多发性骨髓瘤研究基金会(MMRF) CureCloud计划(NCT03657251)是一项收集生物标本、临床数据和患者报告结果(PROs)的观察性研究。参与者完成了财务毒性综合评分(COST)和癌症治疗满意度问卷(CTSQ)。结果:在初始时间点,214名参与者完成了pro。平均年龄为68岁,60%为男性,94%为白人。从MM诊断到基线调查完成的中位时间为6年。平均成本评分为29 (SD=10), 37%的患者被认为经历了财务毒性。年轻患者(P < 0.01)和居住在家庭收入中位数较低地区的患者(P = 0.01)更有可能经历财务毒性。经历财务毒性的参与者报告对治疗的满意度较低,平均CTSQ评分比没有经历财务毒性的参与者低6.7分(P < 0.01)。一组患者(n = 75)在大约一年后完成了第二次成本调查。金融毒性状况相对稳定;67%(18/27)基线时出现财务毒性的患者仍处于较晚时间点,只有10%(5/48)之前未出现财务毒性的患者处于较晚时间点。结论:超过三分之一的MM患者被认为经历了经济毒性,经济毒性与MM治疗满意度降低有关。
{"title":"Financial Toxicity and Satisfaction With Cancer Treatment Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of the MMRF's CureCloud Initiative.","authors":"Mark A Fiala, Eva Lepisto, Chioma Amadi-Mgbenka, Jessica Schulman, George Mulligan, Hearn Jay Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored financial toxicity and its association with treatment satisfaction among a longitudinal cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The multiple myeloma research foundation (MMRF) CureCloud initiative (NCT03657251) is an observational study which collects biospecimens, clinical data, and patient reported outcomes (PROs). Participants completed the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) and the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the initial time point, 214 participants completed the PROs. The mean age was 68, 60% were male, and 94% were white. The median time from MM diagnosis to the baseline survey completion was 6 years. The mean COST score was 29 (SD=10) and 37% of the patients were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity. Younger patients (P < .01) and those residing in areas with lower median household incomes (P = .01) were more likely to be experiencing financial toxicity. Participants experiencing financial toxicity reported lower satisfaction with their therapy, with a mean CTSQ score 6.7 points lower than those without (P < .01). A subset of patients (n = 75) completed a second COST survey approximately 1 year later. Financial toxicity status was relatively stable; 67% (18/27) of patients experiencing it at baseline were still at the later time point and only 10% (5/48) of patients previously not experiencing financial toxicity were at the later time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over one-third of patients with MM were considered to be experiencing financial toxicity and financial toxicity was associated with reduced satisfaction with MM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145437702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dose Delays and Treatment Interruptions Secondary to Ocular Toxicity From BCMA-Directed Antibody Drug Conjugate Therapy in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. bcma定向抗体药物偶联治疗复发性多发性骨髓瘤的剂量延迟和治疗中断继发于眼部毒性。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.003
Matthew J Rees, Timothy T Xu, Suheil Albert Atallah-Yunes, Kenneth J C Lim, Sikander Ailawadhi, Ricardo Parrondo, Rafael Fonseca, Peter Leif Bergsagel, Suzanne Hayman, Angela Dispenzieri, Francis Buadi, David Dingli, Rahma Warsame, Prashant Kapoor, Jithma P Abeykoon, Morie A Gertz, Eli Muchtar, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Wilson Gonsalves, S Vincent Rajkumar, Sanjay V Patel, Shaji Kumar

Introduction: Uptake of BCMA-directed antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in multiple myeloma has been hindered by ocular side-effects. Belantamab mafodotin (BelMaf) and MEDI2228 are BCMA-directed monoclonal-antibodies conjugated to the microtubule inhibitor, monomethyl auristatin F and the alkylator, pyrrolobenzodiazepine, respectively. Differences in ADC payload, antibody specificity and linker stability influence ocular toxicity.

Aim/methods: We investigated the tolerability and ocular toxicity profiles of BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Retrospective study of 111 patients treated with BCMA-directed ADCs between 2019 and 2022.

Results: Eighty-seven percent of patients were triple-class refractory, 50% penta-class refractory, 14% had prior BCMA-directed therapy and 24% extraosseous disease. Treatments included BelMaf monotherapy (n = 56), BelMaf combination therapy (n = 12) and MEDI2228 monotherapy (n = 43). The overall response rate was 30% for BelMaf and 44% for MEDI2228. Photophobia was more common with MEDI2228 (any-grade: 12% vs. 49%, P < .001), whereas keratopathy was more common with BelMaf (any-grade: 59% vs. 9%, P = .002). Four MEDI2228 recipients developed keratopathy, all grade 1 and associated with dry eyes and/or photophobia. Dose delay for ocular toxicity was comparable for BelMaf and MEDI2228 (28% vs. 19%, P = 0.2), as was the rate of dose reduction (18% vs. 12%, P = .4). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progression/death (BelMaf = 71%, MEDI2228 = 44%) and ocular toxicity (BelMaf = 18%, MEDI2228 = 30%).

Conclusions: Treatment interruptions, dose reductions and drug discontinuation are common with BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Research to optimize the administration schedule of these agents is warranted. BelMaf and MEDI2228 produce distinct patterns of ocular side-effects, namely keratopathy and reduced visual-acuity with the former, and photophobia and dry eyes with the latter.

导读:bcma导向的抗体药物偶联物(adc)在多发性骨髓瘤中的吸收一直受到眼部副作用的阻碍。Belantamab mafodotin (BelMaf)和MEDI2228是bcma定向的单克隆抗体,分别与微管抑制剂monomethyl auristatin F和烷基化物pyrolobenzodiazepine偶联。ADC载荷、抗体特异性和连接体稳定性的差异影响眼毒性。目的/方法:我们研究了bcma导向ADC治疗的耐受性和眼毒性。2019年至2022年间111例接受bcma定向adc治疗的患者的回顾性研究结果:87%的患者为三级难治性,50%为五级难治性,14%的患者先前接受过bcma定向治疗,24%的患者患有骨外疾病。治疗包括BelMaf单药治疗(n = 56)、BelMaf联合治疗(n = 12)和MEDI2228单药治疗(n = 43)。总有效率BelMaf为30%,MEDI2228为44%。畏光在MEDI2228患者中更为常见(任何级别:12%对49%,P < 0.001),而角膜病变在BelMaf患者中更为常见(任何级别:59%对9%,P = 0.002)。4名MEDI2228受助人出现角膜病变,均为1级,伴有眼睛干涩和/或畏光。BelMaf和MEDI2228的眼毒性剂量延迟相当(28%对19%,P = 0.2),剂量减少率也相当(18%对12%,P = 0.4)。最常见的停药原因是进展/死亡(BelMaf = 71%, MEDI2228 = 44%)和眼毒性(BelMaf = 18%, MEDI2228 = 30%)。结论:在bcma导向的ADC治疗中,治疗中断、剂量减少和停药是常见的。优化这些药物的给药计划的研究是必要的。BelMaf和MEDI2228会产生不同类型的眼部副作用,即前者会导致角膜病变和视力下降,后者会导致畏光和眼睛干枯。
{"title":"Dose Delays and Treatment Interruptions Secondary to Ocular Toxicity From BCMA-Directed Antibody Drug Conjugate Therapy in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Matthew J Rees, Timothy T Xu, Suheil Albert Atallah-Yunes, Kenneth J C Lim, Sikander Ailawadhi, Ricardo Parrondo, Rafael Fonseca, Peter Leif Bergsagel, Suzanne Hayman, Angela Dispenzieri, Francis Buadi, David Dingli, Rahma Warsame, Prashant Kapoor, Jithma P Abeykoon, Morie A Gertz, Eli Muchtar, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Wilson Gonsalves, S Vincent Rajkumar, Sanjay V Patel, Shaji Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Uptake of BCMA-directed antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in multiple myeloma has been hindered by ocular side-effects. Belantamab mafodotin (BelMaf) and MEDI2228 are BCMA-directed monoclonal-antibodies conjugated to the microtubule inhibitor, monomethyl auristatin F and the alkylator, pyrrolobenzodiazepine, respectively. Differences in ADC payload, antibody specificity and linker stability influence ocular toxicity.</p><p><strong>Aim/methods: </strong>We investigated the tolerability and ocular toxicity profiles of BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Retrospective study of 111 patients treated with BCMA-directed ADCs between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven percent of patients were triple-class refractory, 50% penta-class refractory, 14% had prior BCMA-directed therapy and 24% extraosseous disease. Treatments included BelMaf monotherapy (n = 56), BelMaf combination therapy (n = 12) and MEDI2228 monotherapy (n = 43). The overall response rate was 30% for BelMaf and 44% for MEDI2228. Photophobia was more common with MEDI2228 (any-grade: 12% vs. 49%, P < .001), whereas keratopathy was more common with BelMaf (any-grade: 59% vs. 9%, P = .002). Four MEDI2228 recipients developed keratopathy, all grade 1 and associated with dry eyes and/or photophobia. Dose delay for ocular toxicity was comparable for BelMaf and MEDI2228 (28% vs. 19%, P = 0.2), as was the rate of dose reduction (18% vs. 12%, P = .4). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progression/death (BelMaf = 71%, MEDI2228 = 44%) and ocular toxicity (BelMaf = 18%, MEDI2228 = 30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment interruptions, dose reductions and drug discontinuation are common with BCMA-directed ADC therapy. Research to optimize the administration schedule of these agents is warranted. BelMaf and MEDI2228 produce distinct patterns of ocular side-effects, namely keratopathy and reduced visual-acuity with the former, and photophobia and dry eyes with the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145399548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1