Clinical Endoscopy最新文献

Diagnosis of biliary strictures remains challenging because of the low sensitivity of conventional transpapillary sampling using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. New devices and tips have been developed to increase the diagnostic yield of conventional transpapillary sampling. However, additional endoscopic procedures are often necessary for indeterminate biliary strictures. Two major approaches for indeterminate biliary strictures are endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling and peroral cholangioscopy (POCS)-guided biopsy. The selection of modalities should be considered based on the stricture location. Although endoscopic ultrasound is the preferred approach for distal biliary strictures, POCS is preferred for perihilar biliary strictures. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling is highly sensitive in cases with a mass, but the sensitivity of POCS-guided biopsies is unsatisfactory, and discrepancy with the visual diagnosis of POCS is common. Whether these advanced techniques should be performed as the initial procedure or as a rescue after a failed diagnosis by conventional transpapillary sampling needs to be clarified in terms of diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a minimally invasive technique that is increasingly used for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originating from the muscularis propria. Despite its advantages over conventional surgery, such as complete tumor resection and faster recovery, EFTR faces challenges related to its efficacy, safety, and feasibility, particularly in gastric GISTs. By summarizing the literature published over the past decade, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical outcomes of EFTR and the evolution of defect closure devices.

Background: In patients undergoing endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones (CBDs) and subsequent cholecystectomy, CBDs sometimes recur during the preoperative and perioperative periods. In this study, the incidence and risk factors for CBDs recurrence were investigated.

Methods: A total of 245 patients (mean age: 66 years; 138 men) who underwent cholecystectomy within 180 days of CBDs extraction between October 2017 and June 2023 were included. Recurrence was defined as the detection of the CBDs during the preoperative or perioperative period using imaging modalities such as computed tomography or re-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, regardless of the presence of cholangitis.

Results: CBDs recurrence occurred in 4.1% of the patients (10/245). The median time to recurrence was 40 days. Preoperative recurrence was observed in nine patients, and only one patient had postoperative recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified cystic duct stones as the only significant risk factor for CBDs recurrence (hazard ratio, 15.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.7-66; p<0.001).

Conclusions: The risk of CBDs recurrence after endoscopic extraction during the pre and perioperative periods is high in patients with cystic duct stones. Prophylactic biliary stenting may be considered in high-risk patients.

Background: Pancreatic stenting reduces post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) and aids in cannulation in difficult cases. However, conservative endoscopists may stop at this step, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. This study assessed the efficacy of transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) as a rescue procedure following pancreatic stenting.

Methods: Between March 2013 and November 2018, 82 patients underwent pancreatic stenting at our institution prior to successful biliary cannulation. TPS was introduced in April 2016, and patients were divided into Before TPS and After TPS groups. The outcomes included cannulation success, PEP incidence, and predictors of TPS conversion.

Results: There were 43 and 39 patients in the Before TPS and After TPS groups, respectively. Twenty-two patients (56.4%) underwent conversion to TPS in the After TPS group. The After TPS group had a higher bile duct cannulation rate (89.7% vs. 72.1%) than the Before TPS group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.054). Multivariate analysis showed that age >50 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.181; p=0.021) and being in the After TPS group (OR, 0.712; p=0.039) were independently associated with reduced PEP risk. Haraldsson Type 2 and Type 4 papillae carried a relatively high TPS conversion rate.

Conclusions: A stepwise cannulation strategy that incorporates TPS after pancreatic stenting minimizes the need for advanced techniques and improves PEP outcomes.