Clinical colorectal cancer最新文献

Background

The use of immunotherapy in mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer (pMMR-CRC) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with limited efficacy. DAPPER (NCT03851614) is a phase 2, basket study randomizing patients with pMMR CRC or PDAC to durvalumab with olaparib (durvalumab + olaparib) or durvalumab with cediranib (durvalumab + cediranib).

Methods

PDAC or pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to either durvalumab+olaparib (arm A), or durvalumab + cediranib (arm B). Co-primary endpoints included pharmacodynamic immune changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and safety. Objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined. Paired tumor samples were analyzed by multiplexed immunohistochemistry and RNA-sequencing.

Results

A total of 31 metastatic pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to arm A (n = 16) or B (n = 15). In 28 evaluable patients, 3 patients had stable disease (SD) (2 patients treated with durvalumab + olaparib and 1 patient treated with durvalumab + cediranib) while 25 had progressive disease (PD). Among patients with PDAC (n = 19), 9 patients were randomized to arm A and 10 patients were randomized to arm B. In 18 evaluable patients, 1 patient had a partial response (unconfirmed) with durvalumab + cediranib, 1 patient had SD with durvalumab + olaparib while 16 had PD. Safety profile was manageable and no grade 4-5 treatment-related adverse events were observed in either arm A or B. No significant changes were observed for CD3+/CD8+ immune infiltration in on-treatment biopsies as compared to baseline for pMMR-CRC and PDAC independent of treatment arms. Increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at baseline, low baseline CD68+ cells and different immune gene expression signatures at baseline were associated with outcomes.

Conclusions

In patients with pMMR-CRC or PDAC, durvalumab + olaparib and durvalumab + cediranib showed limited antitumor activity. Different immune components of the TME were associated with treatment outcomes.

Background

Treatment recommendations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not differ by age group; nevertheless, aggressive multiagent chemotherapy comprising FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev) is routinely administered in younger patients. This study analyzed real-world data on index triplet+bev use and subsequent systemic therapies.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with mCRC, who were initiated on triplet+bev. Data were derived from the Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset.

Results

Of 36,056 patients, 14%, 36%, and 50% were aged 18-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. During the study period (2010-2021), triplet+bev use increased in patients aged 18-49 years (1%-4%) but remained at approximately 3% and 1% in patients aged 50-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics varied slightly; of patients receiving triplet+bev (n = 921) versus nontriplet+bev (n = 35,132) most were male (57% vs. 52%), resided in the Midwest (54% vs. 49%) and Northeast (18% vs. 14%) US regions, and had secondary malignancies (86% vs. 73%). Following triplet+bev, most patients received subsequent therapies (including continued triplet component therapies; 97%) or subsequent “new” therapies (therapies that did not include any agents comprising triplet+bev; 57%), most frequently EGFR inhibitors (28%) and regorafenib (21%), with a similar trend among all age groups.

Conclusions

Overall, this study shows that younger patients with mCRC are more likely to receive first-line triplet+bev. These results also reveal that nonchemotherapy options are often used beyond first-line triplet chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.

Background

Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against PD-1, has shown limited efficacy in patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair proficient (MSS/pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated vicriviroc (small-molecule C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 antagonist) plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC.

Patients and methods

This open-label, phase 2 trial (NCT03631407) enrolled adults with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic CRC that was MSS per local assessment. All patients had received previous treatment with standard therapies. Patients were randomized 1:1 to vicriviroc 150 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or vicriviroc 250 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (2 years). Primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events (AEs), and discontinuations due to AEs.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled and treated. ORR was 5% (95% CI, 0.1%-24.9%) in both treatment groups. There were no complete responses; 1 patient in each treatment group experienced a partial response. No patient in the vicriviroc 150 mg plus pembrolizumab group experienced a DLT. Two patients in the vicriviroc 250 mg plus pembrolizumab group experienced DLTs (1 grade 4 encephalopathy and 1 grade 4 pneumonitis).

Conclusion

The combination of vicriviroc at doses of 150 or 250 mg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg showed limited antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. Toxicity with the combination was manageable.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex and genetically heterogeneous disease presenting a specific metastatic pattern, with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Around 20%-25% of patients with CRC will develop exclusively hepatic metastatic disease throughout their disease history. With its specific characteristics and therapeutic options, liver-limited disease (LLD) should be considered as a specific entity. The identification of these patients is particularly relevant in view of the growing interest in liver transplantation in selected patients with advanced CRC. Identifying why some patients will develop only LLD remains a challenge, mainly because of a lack of a systemic understanding of this complex and interlinked phenomenon given that cancer has traditionally been investigated according to distinct physiological compartments. Recently, multidisciplinary efforts and new diagnostic tools have made it possible to study some of these complex issues in greater depth and may help identify targets and specific treatment strategies to benefit these patients. In this review we analyze the underlying biology and available tools to help clinicians better understand this increasingly common and specific disease.

Background

Colorectal carcinoma in situ, characterized by cancer limited to the intramucosal layer or known as intraepithelial carcinoma, has conventionally considered to be without any risk of regional lymph node metastasis. However, isolated cases of regional lymph node metastasis, local recurrence, and distant metastasis challenge this assumption. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of regional lymph node metastasis and recurrence of colorectal carcinoma in situ.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted in 1069 patients who underwent full-thickness local excision or radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma in situ between January 1994 and December 2020. Histopathological features were assessed by 2 experienced pathologists. In cases of suspected recurrence, evaluation involved abdomen-pelvis and chest computed tomography, or PET-CT.

Results

The recurrence rate of colorectal carcinoma in situ patients was 0.46%. Among the patients, 9 were diagnosed with regional lymph node metastasis or cancer recurrence. Of these, 4 patients were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis during primary surgery; 2 exhibited regional lymph node metastasis, and 2 presented with both regional and distant lymph node metastases. Regional lymph node metastasis occurred in additional 2 patients after radical surgery for the primary tumor. Distant metastasis was observed in 3 patients: hepatic metastasis in 1, hepatic and pulmonary metastases in another, and small bowel metastasis in the third patient. Among the 5 patients experiencing cancer recurrence, 1 expired due to cancer progression.

Conclusion

Contrary to previous assumptions, colorectal carcinoma in situ can potentially metastasize to lymph nodes and recur. Therefore, careful assessment at the time of diagnosis is crucial, recognizing the possibility of lymph node metastasis or recurrence. This approach is essential for accurately identifying instances of cancer recurrence and ensuring optimal oncological outcomes.

Background

Neoadjuvant radiation and oxaliplatin-based systemic therapy (total neoadjuvant therapy—TNT) have been shown to increase response and organ-preservation rates in localized rectal cancer. However, trials have been heterogeneous regarding treatment protocols and few have used a watch-and-wait (WW) approach for complete responders. This trial evaluates if conventional long-term chemoradiation followed by consolidation of FOLFIRINOX increases complete response rates and the number of patients managed by WW.

Methods

This was a pragmatic randomized phase II trial conducted in 2 Cancer Centers in Brazil that included patients with T3+ or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma. After completing a long-course 54 Gy chemoradiation with capecitabine patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin 85, irinotecan 150, 5-FU 2400)—TNT-arm—or to the control arm, that did not include further neoadjuvant treatment. All patients were re-staged with dedicated pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and sigmoidoscopy 12 weeks after the end of radiation. Patients with a clinical complete response were followed using a WW protocol. The primary endpoint was complete response: clinical complete response (cCR) or pathological response (pCR).

Results

Between April 2021 and June 2023, 55 patients were randomized to TNT and 53 to the control arm. Tumors were 74% stage 3, median distance from the anal verge was 6 cm, 63% had an at-risk circumferential margin, and 33% an involved sphincter. The rates of cCR + pCR were (31%) for TNT versus (17%) for controls (odds ratio 2.19, CI 95% 0.8-6.22 P = .091) and rates of WW were 16% and 9% (P = ns). Median follow-up was 8.1 months and recurrence rates were 16% versus 21% for TNT and controls (P = ns).

Conclusions

TNT with consolidation FOLFIRINOX is feasible and has high response rates, consistent with the current literature for TNT. This trial was supported by a grant from the Brazilian Government (PROADI-SUS - NUP 25000.164382/2020-81).

Background

The phase 1b KEYNOTE-651 study evaluated pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (previously untreated; cohort B) or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (previously treated with fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin; cohort D) every 2 weeks. Primary end point was safety; investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 was secondary and biomarker analysis was exploratory.

Results

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in cohort B and 32 in cohort D; median follow-up was 30.2 and 33.5 months, respectively. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 small intestine obstruction) occurred in cohort D. In cohort B, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 18 patients (58%), most commonly neutropenia and decreased neutrophil count (n = 5 each). In cohort D, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 17 patients (53%), most commonly neutropenia (n = 7). No grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred. Objective response rate was 61% in cohort B (KRAS wildtype: 71%; KRAS mutant: 53%) and 25% in cohort D (KRAS wildtype: 47%; KRAS mutant: 6%). In both cohorts, PD-L1 combined positive score and T-cell-inflamed gene expression profiles were higher and HER2 expression was lower in responders than nonresponders. No association between tumor mutational burden and response was observed.

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan demonstrated an acceptable AE profile. Efficacy data appeared comparable with current standard of care (including by KRAS mutation status). Biomarker analyses were hypothesis-generating, warranting further exploration.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03374254

Background

A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).

Materials and Methods

An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions.

Results

Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT.

Conclusions

Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.

Background

Cohorts A, C, and E of the phase Ib KEYNOTE-651 study evaluated pembrolizumab + binimetinib ± chemotherapy in microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus binimetinib 30 mg twice daily alone (cohort A; previously treated with any chemotherapy) or with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (cohort C; previously untreated) or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (cohort E; previously treated with 1 line of therapy including fluoropyrimidine + oxaliplatin-based regimen) every 2 weeks. Binimetinib dose-escalation to 45 mg twice daily was planned in all cohorts using a modified toxicity probability interval design (target dose-limiting toxicity [DLT], 30%). The primary endpoint was safety; investigator-assessed objective response rate was secondary.

Results

In cohort A, 1/6 patients (17%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg; none occurred in 14 patients with 45 mg. In cohort C, 3/9 patients (33%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg; dose was not escalated to 45 mg. In cohort E, 1/5 patients (20%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg; 5/10 patients (50%) had DLTs with 45 mg. Enrollment was stopped in cohort E binimetinib 45 mg and deescalated to 30 mg; 2/4 additional patients (50%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg (total 3/9 [33%] had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg). Objective response rate was 0% in cohort A, 9% in cohort C, and 15% in cohort E.

Conclusion

Per DLT criteria, binimetinib + pembrolizumab (cohort A) was tolerable, binimetinib + pembrolizumab + 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (cohort C) did not qualify for binimetinib dose escalation to 45 mg, and binimetinib + pembrolizumab + 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (cohort E) required binimetinib dose reduction from 45 to 30 mg. No new safety findings were observed across cohorts. There was no apparent additive efficacy when binimetinib + pembrolizumab was added to chemotherapy. Data did not support continued enrollment in cohorts C and E.

Microabstract

This study evaluates the prognostic significance of obstructions in stage IIA colon cancer, distinguishing between partial and complete obstructions. It employs a retrospective review of 1914 patients with propensity score matching to analyze oncologic outcomes. Findings reveal complete obstruction as a significant risk factor for poorer outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for further research to refine treatment strategies, particularly regarding the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy across obstruction types.

Background

This study examined the prognostic impact of obstructions in stage IIA colon cancer. The analysis specifically differentiated partial and complete obstructions, analyzing their distinct influences of both on oncologic outcomes.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of stage IIA colon cancer cases with the presence of an obstruction. Patients were stratified by whether it was partial or complete based on the severity of obstruction. Propensity score matching was employed to control for confounders.

Results

Among 1914 consecutive patients diagnosed with stage IIA colon cancer, 758 patients (597 patients with partial obstruction, 161 patients with complete obstruction) exhibited obstruction, while 1156 patients had no obstruction. The median follow-up period was 126 months. Complete obstruction was associated with poorer disease-free survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.785, P < .001) and overall survival (HR = 1.853, P = .001). This trend persisted after propensity score matching, patients with complete obstruction showing a worsened disease-free survival (HR = 1.666, P = .028) and overall survival (HR = 1.732, P = .041). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed improved outcomes overall, but its efficacy varied across obstruction types.

Conclusion

Differentiating between complete and partial obstructions in stage IIA colon cancer is an important clinical distinction, as our findings suggest that complete obstruction is a significant risk factor for poorer oncologic outcomes. While adjuvant chemotherapy generally improves prognosis in stage IIA colon cancer, the correlation of obstruction type with its efficacy remains uncertain, necessitating further research to refine treatment strategies.