Clinical colorectal cancer最新文献

Background

Methods

KRAS mutations contribute substantially to the overall colorectal cancer burden and have long been a focus of drug development efforts. After a lengthy preclinical road, KRAS inhibition via the G12C allele has finally become a therapeutic reality. Unlike in NSCLC, early studies of KRAS inhibitors in CRC struggled to demonstrate single agent activity. Investigation into these tissue-specific treatment differences has led to a deeper understanding of the complexities of MAPK signaling and the diverse adaptive feedback responses to KRAS inhibition. EGFR reactivation has emerged as a principal resistance mechanism to KRAS inhibitor monotherapy. Thus, the field has pivoted to dual EGFR/KRAS blockade with promising efficacy. Despite significant strides in the treatment of KRAS G12C mutated CRC, new challenges are on the horizon. Alternative RTK reactivation and countless acquired molecular resistance mechanisms have shifted the treatment goalpost. This review focuses on the historical and contemporary clinical strategies of targeting KRAS G12C alterations in CRC and highlights future directions to overcome treatment challenges.

Background

About one third of patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (dMMR/MSI-H mCRC) experience primary resistance or early progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), while others benefit from exceptionally long-lasting responses. In this single-centre retrospective study, we aimed to identify variables associated with improved overall survival (OS) as well as early disease progression.

Methods

All dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICI between 2014 and 2022 were included. Baseline patient demographics, tumour characteristics as well response and outcome data were recorded. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Uni- and multivariate cox regression analysis was used to identify parameters associated with improved OS. Clinicopathological factors associated with early progression (≤ 12 months after treatment initiation) were assessed using uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

About 84 ICI-treated dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients were included. Progressive disease occurred in 37 (44%) patients, but only in 11 (19%) patients with disease control at 12 months. Median OS was 80 months and improved outcome was associated with a lower neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = .004) and the presence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (P = .015). Early progression was associated with poor performance status (P = .036), a higher blood CRP level (P = .033) and absence of irAEs (P = .002).

Conclusion

Disease progression in ICI-treated dMMR/MSI-H mCRC rarely occurs in patients experiencing disease control for at least 12 months. Performance status, presence of immune-related adverse events, CRP levels, CEA levels and NLR can be helpful to identify those patients that may benefit from ICI treatment, guiding clinicians in therapeutic decisions.

Introduction

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not show survival benefit over the standard long course chemoradiotherapy. Trials of TNT did not address the impact of each risk feature in isolation from other high-risk features.

Methodology

In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical outcomes of patients with T4 and/or N2 rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After obtaining the local regulatory approvals, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients in Manitoba between January 2007 and December 2019.

Results

The cohort included 331 patients. 61 patients had T4-only disease and 218 had N2-only disease. Mean age was 59.65 years. 74.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), but only 56.5% completed the planned course. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of patients (78.7% and 97.2% in T4 and N2, respectively). Median follow up was 4.93 years. 3-year overall recurrence rate was 29%. 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was 8% (16% and 6% in T4 and N2, respectively). 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 84% in the whole cohort (72.6% and 87.1% in T4 and N2, respectively). Incomplete surgical resection was a poor prognostic factor for both OS and LRR. ACT was associated with a survival benefit in the whole cohort (P = .001) and in the N2 sub-cohort (P = 003) but there was no survival benefit observed in T4 sub-cohort. ACT did not have an impact on LRR.

Conclusions

Achieving R0 resection in LARC with neoadjuvant therapy improves recurrence and survival rates. T4 disease carries a worse clinical outcome than N2 and consideration should be given to upstage T4 to stage III. Different high-risk features in LARC predict different clinical outcomes. In the era of TNT, personalization of treatment strategy based on these factors could potentially improve outcomes.

Background

The use of immunotherapy in mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer (pMMR-CRC) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with limited efficacy. DAPPER (NCT03851614) is a phase 2, basket study randomizing patients with pMMR CRC or PDAC to durvalumab with olaparib (durvalumab + olaparib) or durvalumab with cediranib (durvalumab + cediranib).

Methods

PDAC or pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to either durvalumab+olaparib (arm A), or durvalumab + cediranib (arm B). Co-primary endpoints included pharmacodynamic immune changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and safety. Objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined. Paired tumor samples were analyzed by multiplexed immunohistochemistry and RNA-sequencing.

Results

A total of 31 metastatic pMMR-CRC patients were randomized to arm A (n = 16) or B (n = 15). In 28 evaluable patients, 3 patients had stable disease (SD) (2 patients treated with durvalumab + olaparib and 1 patient treated with durvalumab + cediranib) while 25 had progressive disease (PD). Among patients with PDAC (n = 19), 9 patients were randomized to arm A and 10 patients were randomized to arm B. In 18 evaluable patients, 1 patient had a partial response (unconfirmed) with durvalumab + cediranib, 1 patient had SD with durvalumab + olaparib while 16 had PD. Safety profile was manageable and no grade 4-5 treatment-related adverse events were observed in either arm A or B. No significant changes were observed for CD3+/CD8+ immune infiltration in on-treatment biopsies as compared to baseline for pMMR-CRC and PDAC independent of treatment arms. Increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at baseline, low baseline CD68+ cells and different immune gene expression signatures at baseline were associated with outcomes.

Conclusions

In patients with pMMR-CRC or PDAC, durvalumab + olaparib and durvalumab + cediranib showed limited antitumor activity. Different immune components of the TME were associated with treatment outcomes.

BRAF^V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer represents a distinct molecular phenotype known for its aggressive biological behavior, resistance to standard therapies, and poor survival rates. Improved understanding of the biology of the BRAF oncogene has led to the development of targeted therapies that have paved the way for a paradigm shift in managing this disease. However, despite significant recent advancements, responses to targeted therapies are short-lived, and several challenges remain. In this review, we discuss how progress in treating BRAF^V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer has been made through a better understanding of its unique biological and clinical features. We provide an overview of the evidence to support current treatment approaches and discuss critical areas of need and future research strategies that hold the potential to refine clinical practice further. We also discuss some challenging aspects of managing this disease, particularly the complexity of acquired resistance mechanisms that develop under the selective pressure of targeted therapies and rational strategies being investigated to overcome them.

Background

Treatment recommendations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not differ by age group; nevertheless, aggressive multiagent chemotherapy comprising FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev) is routinely administered in younger patients. This study analyzed real-world data on index triplet+bev use and subsequent systemic therapies.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with mCRC, who were initiated on triplet+bev. Data were derived from the Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset.

Results

Of 36,056 patients, 14%, 36%, and 50% were aged 18-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. During the study period (2010-2021), triplet+bev use increased in patients aged 18-49 years (1%-4%) but remained at approximately 3% and 1% in patients aged 50-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics varied slightly; of patients receiving triplet+bev (n = 921) versus nontriplet+bev (n = 35,132) most were male (57% vs. 52%), resided in the Midwest (54% vs. 49%) and Northeast (18% vs. 14%) US regions, and had secondary malignancies (86% vs. 73%). Following triplet+bev, most patients received subsequent therapies (including continued triplet component therapies; 97%) or subsequent “new” therapies (therapies that did not include any agents comprising triplet+bev; 57%), most frequently EGFR inhibitors (28%) and regorafenib (21%), with a similar trend among all age groups.

Conclusions

Overall, this study shows that younger patients with mCRC are more likely to receive first-line triplet+bev. These results also reveal that nonchemotherapy options are often used beyond first-line triplet chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.

Background

Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against PD-1, has shown limited efficacy in patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair proficient (MSS/pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated vicriviroc (small-molecule C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 antagonist) plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC.

Patients and methods

This open-label, phase 2 trial (NCT03631407) enrolled adults with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic CRC that was MSS per local assessment. All patients had received previous treatment with standard therapies. Patients were randomized 1:1 to vicriviroc 150 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or vicriviroc 250 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (2 years). Primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events (AEs), and discontinuations due to AEs.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled and treated. ORR was 5% (95% CI, 0.1%-24.9%) in both treatment groups. There were no complete responses; 1 patient in each treatment group experienced a partial response. No patient in the vicriviroc 150 mg plus pembrolizumab group experienced a DLT. Two patients in the vicriviroc 250 mg plus pembrolizumab group experienced DLTs (1 grade 4 encephalopathy and 1 grade 4 pneumonitis).

Conclusion

The combination of vicriviroc at doses of 150 or 250 mg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg showed limited antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. Toxicity with the combination was manageable.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex and genetically heterogeneous disease presenting a specific metastatic pattern, with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Around 20%-25% of patients with CRC will develop exclusively hepatic metastatic disease throughout their disease history. With its specific characteristics and therapeutic options, liver-limited disease (LLD) should be considered as a specific entity. The identification of these patients is particularly relevant in view of the growing interest in liver transplantation in selected patients with advanced CRC. Identifying why some patients will develop only LLD remains a challenge, mainly because of a lack of a systemic understanding of this complex and interlinked phenomenon given that cancer has traditionally been investigated according to distinct physiological compartments. Recently, multidisciplinary efforts and new diagnostic tools have made it possible to study some of these complex issues in greater depth and may help identify targets and specific treatment strategies to benefit these patients. In this review we analyze the underlying biology and available tools to help clinicians better understand this increasingly common and specific disease.