Clinical Drug Investigation最新文献

Background and objective: Most evidence suggests that the pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are not meaningfully altered by patient characteristics, including racial/ethnic differences. Nevertheless, the pharmacokinetic profile of eptinezumab has not been evaluated in a Chinese population. This study was designed to confirm the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetic profile of the anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide mAb, eptinezumab, is similar in healthy Chinese individuals to that of healthy non-Asian individuals and non-Asian patients with migraine.

Methods: Over a study period of 12 weeks, healthy adult Chinese participants (N = 20) were randomized (1:1) to receive a single intravenous dose of eptinezumab 100 mg (n = 10) or 300 mg (n = 10) in a prospective, single-site, open-label parallel-group trial. Blood samples for the evaluation of plasma eptinezumab concentrations were obtained over 84 days, and standard pharmacokinetic parameters were derived.

Results: Mean maximum plasma concentrations (C_max) of eptinezumab occurred 1.0-1.5 h post start of infusion, were similar between the 100 mg and 300 mg dose groups, and slowly declined in a biphasic manner. C_max and area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) increased in a dose-proportional manner. Volume of distribution and clearance were similar between the 100 mg and 300 mg dose groups, and half-life was 22.5-28.1 days. Eptinezumab was generally well tolerated with no new safety signals identified. Only one participant, randomized to the 100 mg dose group, was positive for eptinezumab anti-drug antibodies, but negative for neutralizing antibodies, with no impact on pharmacokinetics.

Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic profile of eptinezumab in healthy Chinese individuals was generally similar to that reported for non-Asian populations with migraine, and eptinezumab was generally well tolerated. Evaluation of immunogenicity showed no evidence of an impact of anti-drug antibodies or neutralizing antibodies on safety profiles. This supports the globally approved doses of 100 mg and 300 mg as being appropriate for Chinese patients with episodic migraine or chronic migraine.

Background and objective: The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant was approved in 2022 for the treatment of insomnia at doses up to 50 mg once per night. This study aimed at investigating the effect of daridorexant 50 mg at steady state on the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran, the active moiety of dabigatran etexilate, and rosuvastatin, sensitive substrates of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein, respectively.

Methods: This single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study enrolled 24 healthy male subjects who were dosed orally with dabigatran etexilate 75 mg on days 1 (Treatment A1) and 9 (Treatment C1) as well as rosuvastatin 10 mg on days 3 (Treatment A2) and 11 (Treatment C2). On days 7-14, daridorexant (50 mg once daily) was administered. Blood samples for the pharmacokinetics of both substrates and the pharmacodynamics of dabigatran, i.e., two coagulation tests, were collected and safety assessments performed. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic variables were evaluated with geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of Treatment C1/C2 versus A1/A2.

Results: Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of dabigatran maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were 1.3 (1.0-1.7) and 1.4 (1.1-1.9), respectively, whereas the time to maximum plasma concentration and terminal half-life were comparable between treatments. Pharmacodynamic variables showed a similar pattern as dabigatran pharmacokinetics in both treatments. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics were unchanged upon concomitant daridorexant administration. All treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions: A mild inhibition of P-glycoprotein was observed after administration of daridorexant (50 mg once daily) at steady state, whereas breast cancer resistance protein was not affected.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05480475; date of registration: 29 July, 2022.

Background and objective: Acitretin has long-lasting teratogenic properties. Therefore, pregnancies must be avoided during and within 3 years after acitretin treatment. We aimed to describe (i) acitretin use in women of childbearing age in Germany, (ii) the occurrence of acitretin-exposed pregnancies, and (iii) malformations among children exposed in utero.

Methods: Using 2004-2019 data from the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD-claims data from ~ 20% of the German population), we determined annual age-standardized prevalence of acitretin use among girls and women aged 13-49 years. In longitudinal analyses, we estimated the number of exposed pregnancies by assessing whether the exposure window assigned to the last dispensation before pregnancy (days covered by dispensation plus 3 years) overlapped the onset of pregnancy or whether there was a dispensation in the first eight weeks of pregnancy. Data of live-born children with in utero exposure to acitretin were reviewed to assess the presence of congenital malformations.

Results: The age-standardized prevalence of acitretin use per 1000 girls and women was 0.04 in 2019. We identified 35 acitretin-exposed pregnancies; 94.3% of these pregnancies were classified as exposed because they occurred within 3 years after stopping acitretin treatment. Among 18 live-born children linked to their mother, four children (22.2%) had congenital malformations (three children with a major malformation).

Conclusions: We observed 35 acitretin-exposed pregnancies mainly because treatment ended too late before pregnancy. Approximately one in five children born from these pregnancies had malformations, highlighting the importance of drawing more attention to the long-lasting teratogenicity of this drug.

Acthar^® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides that is believed to have both steroidogenic and nonsteroidogenic immunomodulatory effects via activation of melanocortin receptors in various cells throughout the body. Since 1952, Acthar has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Since 2014, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals has conducted a large number of preclinical, clinical, and real-world-evidence studies of Acthar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, multiple sclerosis relapse, ophthalmic disorders, sarcoidosis, and nephrotic syndrome. To date, Acthar has been the subject of more than 500 publications, many of which demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Acthar in patients with inflammatory diseases for whom standard treatments were ineffective or intolerable. Here, we review the history of Acthar and the findings of studies that have investigated the mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and real-world effectiveness of Acthar for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

Background: Treatment of chronic prurigo (CPG) is challenging. As an antagonist of IL-4R, dupilumab has shown effectiveness in treating CPG in several clinical studies. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dupilumab for the treatment of prurigo nodularis (PN).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of dupilumab in Chinese patients with CPG, and to analyze the difference in response between subtypes of CPG.

Methods: This retrospective study included 18 patients with CPG who were treated with dupilumab for at least 16 weeks from March 2022 to October 2022. Disease severity and patient self-assessment questionnaires were assessed at baseline and each visit, including the peak Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (PP-VAS), Prurigo Activity and Severity Score (PAS), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Itchy-specific Quality of Life questionnaire (ItchyQoL).

Results: After 2 weeks of dupilumab treatment, pruritus scores were significantly reduced as measured by PP-VAS scores. Prurigo Activity and Severity scores decreased significantly at Week 2, whereas IGA improved significantly at Week 8. The DLQI, HADS, and ItchyQoL scores at Week 16 also showed significant improvement from baseline. Patients in all subtypes showed improvement in pruritus and lesion severity.

Conclusions: Dupilumab was effective in improving pruritus and lesions in patients with various subtypes of CPG.

Background and objectives: Remdesivir is an antiviral agent, which was shown to be safe and effective in treating early COVID-19, but its favourable impact in hospitalised patients with non-critical disease is still under investigation. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of remdesivir as a treatment for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 by a propensity score analysis of observational data.

Methods: In this monocentric retrospective cohort study, the effectiveness and safety of a 5-day course of remdesivir (200 mg intravenously at Day 1, then 100 mg from Days 2-5) in association with the standard of care were assessed in comparison with the standard of care only. The primary endpoint was the proportion of recovery on Day 14.

Results: Of 3662 eligible inpatients who tested positive for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 genome by nasopharyngeal swab at admission, 861 (24%) non-critical patients were included in a propensity score analysis and 281 (33%) were exposed to remdesivir. In total, 242/281 (86.1%) and 435/580 (75.0%) patients recovered in exposed and non-exposed, respectively, with a relative improvement of 11.1% (95% CI + 5.8 to 16.5%; unadjusted odds ratio: 2.07, 95% CI 1.40-3.05, p = 0.0001; after adjustment by propensity score weighting, odds ratio: 1.92, 95% CI 1.30-2.83, p = 0.001). In treated patients, 1 (0.03%) anaphylactic reaction and 1 (0.03%) acute reaction during drug injection were reported, and 24 (8.5%) patients stopped the treatment due to adverse reactions. No significant differences were found with respect to the secondary efficacy endpoints (in-hospital all-cause death, need for intensive care treatments, clinical improvement score at Day 28) and safety endpoints (any and serious adverse reactions).

Conclusion: A 5-day course of remdesivir in association with the standard of care effectively promoted recovery from COVID-19 among non-critical in-hospital patients and had an acceptable safety profile.

Background and objective: Although tumor lysis syndrome was reported with obinutuzumab and rituximab, the association with CD20 monoclonal antibodies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia is unclear.

Methods: A disproportionality analysis was conducted to investigate the link between CD20 monoclonal antibodies and tumor lysis syndrome by accounting for known confounders and comparing with other anticancer drugs, using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Reporting odds ratios and the information component were calculated as disproportionality measures. A stepwise sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of disproportionality signals. Bradford Hill criteria were adopted to globally assess the potential causal relationship.

Results: From 2004 to 2022, 197, 368, 41, and 14 tumor lysis syndrome reports were detected for obinutuzumab, rituximab, ofatumumab, and alemtuzumab (CD52 monoclonal antibody), respectively. Disproportionality signals were found for the above four monoclonal antibodies when compared with other anticancer drugs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robust disproportionality signals for obinutuzumab, rituximab, and ofatumumab. The median onset time was 4.5, 1.5, and 2.5 days for rituximab, obinutuzumab, and ofatumumab, respectively. A potential causal relationship was fulfilled by assessing Bradford Hill criteria.

Conclusions: This pharmacovigilance study on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System detected a plausible association between CD20 monoclonal antibodies (but not CD52) and tumor lysis syndrome by assessing the adapted Bradford Hill criteria. Urgent clarification of drug- and patient-related risk factors is needed through large comparative population-based studies.