Clinical Drug Investigation最新文献

Background

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is often a use-limiting adverse reaction to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) combination chemotherapy, reducing therapeutic intensity, and, in some cases, requiring platelet transfusion.

Objective

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with urothelial cancer at the initiation of GC combination therapy and the objective was to develop a prediction model for the incidence of severe thrombocytopenia using machine learning.

Methods

We performed receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine the cut-off values of the associated factors. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia. The prediction model was constructed from an ensemble model and gradient-boosted decision trees to estimate the risk of an outcome using the risk factors associated with the occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia.

Results

Of 186 patients included in this study, 46 (25%) experienced severe thrombocytopenia induced by GC therapy. Multivariate analyses revealed that platelet count ≤ 21.4 (×10⁴/µL) [odds ratio 7.19, p < 0.01], hemoglobin ≤ 12.1 (g/dL) [odds ratio 2.41, p = 0.03], lymphocyte count ≤ 1.458 (×10³/µL) [odds ratio 2.47, p = 0.02], and dose of gemcitabine ≥ 775.245 (mg/m²) [odds ratio 4.00, p < 0.01] were risk factors of severe thrombocytopenia. The performance of the prediction model using these associated factors was high (area under the curve 0.76, accuracy 0.82, precision 0.68, recall 0.50, and F-measure 0.58).

Conclusions

Platelet count, hemoglobin level, lymphocyte count, and gemcitabine dose contributed to the development of a novel prediction model to identify the incidence of GC-induced severe thrombocytopenia.

Background and Objectives

BI 1358894, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of transient receptor potential canonical ion channels, is under development for treatment of major depressive disorder. Phase I trials assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of BI 1358894 in Caucasian male healthy volunteers (HVs) have been performed. This Phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BI 1358894 in Japanese male HVs.

Methods

Male HVs were randomized to receive oral BI 1358894 (n = 18) or placebo (n = 6) after a high-fat, high-calorie meal within three dose groups (50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg), administered sequentially in dose-ascending order. The primary endpoint was number of HVs with drug-related adverse events (DRAEs). Secondary endpoints were the pharmacokinetic parameters of BI 1358894.

Results

Overall, 24 male HVs entered the trial [mean (standard deviation) age: 30.0 (7.6) years]. DRAEs occurred in 3/18 HVs (BI 1358894 100 mg group: one HV experienced dizziness and headache; BI 1358894 200 mg group: one HV experienced headache, another reported sleep disorder). BI 1358894 exposure increased dose dependently and proportionally, peaking 4–6 h after administration before declining in a multiphasic manner with a terminal elimination half-life of ~70 h in the 50 mg and 100 mg dose groups, and 203 h in the 200 mg dose group.

Conclusion

BI 1358894 was well tolerated with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in Japanese male HVs, similar to findings from a previous study in Caucasian male HVs.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03875001; 08-Mar-2019).

Background

Schizophrenia is one of the leading causes of disability. Paliperidone palmitate once-monthly injection (PP1M) was developed to provide consistent drug delivery and improve medication adherence for maintenance treatment. It is well known that patients with schizophrenia have higher cardiovascular risks, however little is known about the cardiovascular risks of patients with schizophrenia treated with PP1M in Asia.

Objective

This study aimed to estimate the incidence of cardiovascular events after initiating PP1M treatment and evaluate the cardiovascular risk associations compared with oral second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs).

Methods

Data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database were used to identify a cohort of adult patients with schizophrenia who received any SGAs from 1 March 2012 to 31 December 2018. Patients who initiated PP1M treatment were enrolled for descriptive analysis of incidence rates. PP1M patients were propensity matched 1:1 to patients initiating a new oral SGA, for comparative analysis based on demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment history at baseline, in three-step matching procedures, following the prevalent new-user design to enhance comparability. Follow-up ended at the end of the treatment episode of index drug, death, last record available, or end of the study (31 December 2019). Study endpoints included serious cardiovascular events (including severe ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death), expanded serious cardiovascular events (which further included acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke), and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Risks of study endpoints between matched cohorts were compared using Cox regression.

Results

Overall, 11,023 patients initiating PP1M treatment were identified (49.5% were females; mean age of 43.2 [12.2] years). Overall incidences for serious cardiovascular events, expanded serious cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular hospitalizations were 3.92, 7.88 and 51.96 per 1000 person-years, respectively. In matched cohort analysis (N = 10,115), the hazard ratios (HRs) between initiating PP1M and a new oral SGA for serious cardiovascular events, expanded serious cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular hospitalizations were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.36), 0.88 (95% CI 0.63–1.21), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.69–0.89), respectively.

Conclusion

This study reported the population-based incidence of cardiovascular events in schizophrenic patients initiating PP1M treatment. PP1M was not associated with increased risks of serious cardiovascular events but was potentially associated with lower risks of cardiovascular hospitalizations compared with oral SGAs.

Background

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid and which may be used for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This study focuses on the pharmacokinetic interaction and safety between tegoprazan and the combination of clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth in healthy Chinese subjects.

Methods

An open-label, three-period, single-center, multiple-dosage, single-sequence, phase I trial was conducted in 22 healthy subjects. In period 1, the subjects took tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily for 7 days, and in period 2 they were administered clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg twice daily for 7 days (days 14–20). Tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth potassium citrate were then administered in combination for 7 days (days 21–27) in period 3. Blood samples were collected up to 12 h after the last dose of each period. Safety assessments were performed in each period.

Results

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) [90% confidence interval (CI)] of maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C_max,ss) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve over the dosing interval (AUC_τ) at steady state were 195.93% (175.52–218.71%) and 287.54% (263.28–314.04%) for tegoprazan and 423.23% (382.57–468.22%) and 385.61% (354.62–419.30%) for tegoprazan metabolite M1, respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) of C_max,ss and AUC_τ were 83.69% (77.44–90.45%) and 110.30% (102.74–118.41%) for clarithromycin, 126.25% (114.73–138.93%) and 146.94% (135.33–159.55%) for 14-hydroxyclarithromycin, 75.89% (69.73–82.60%) and 94.34% (87.94–101.20%) for amoxicillin, and 158.43% (125.43–200.11%) and 183.63% (156.42–215.58%) for bismuth, respectively. All reported adverse events were mild. The frequency of adverse events during the coadministration stage was not higher than that during the single- or triple-drug administration stages.

Conclusion

The plasma exposure of tegoprazan, M1, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin and bismuth was increased after the coadministration of tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth. The coadministration exhibited favorable safety and tolerability.

Clinical Trials Registration

CTR20230643.

Background and Objective

Viloxazine extended-release (ER) [Qelbree^®] is a nonstimulant attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment. In vitro studies suggested potential for viloxazine to inhibit cytochrome 450 (CYP) enzymes 1A2, 2B6, 2D6 and 3A4. This clinical study therefore evaluated viloxazine ER effects on index substrates for CYP1A2, 2D6, and 3A4, and secondarily evaluated the impact of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on viloxazine pharmacokinetics.

Methods

Thirty-seven healthy subjects received a modified Cooperstown cocktail (MCC; caffeine 200 mg, dextromethorphan 30 mg, midazolam 0.025 mg/kg) on Day 1, viloxazine ER 900 mg/day on Days 3–5, and a combination of viloxazine ER 900 mg and MCC on Day 6. Viloxazine ER effects on MCC substrates were evaluated using analysis of variance. The impact of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms on steady-state viloxazine plasma concentrations was evaluated using Student’s t test assessing pharmacokinetic parameter differences between poor versus extensive metabolizers.

Results

The least squares geometric mean ratio [GMR%] (90% CI) of MCC substrate + viloxazine ER/MCC substrate alone for caffeine maximum concentration (C_max), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_t), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC_∞) was 99.11 (95.84–102.49), 436.15 (398.87–476.92), and 583.35 (262.41–1296.80), respectively; 150.76 (126.03–180.35), 185.76 (155.01–222.61), and 189.71 (160.37–224.42) for dextromethorphan C_max, AUC_t, and AUC_∞, respectively; and 112.81 (104.71–121.54), 167.56 (153.05–183.45), and 168.91 (154.38–184.80) for midazolam C_max, AUC_t, and AUC_∞, respectively. At steady state, viloxazine least squares GMR (90% CI) for poor/extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers were C_max 120.70 (102.33–142.37) and area under the plasme concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC_0–24 125.66 (105.36–149.87)).

Conclusion

Viloxazine ER is a strong CYP1A2 inhibitor and a weak CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitor. CYP2D6 polymorphisms did not meaningfully alter the viloxazine ER pharmacokinetic profile.

Background and objective: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics have shown benefits over oral medications with reduced hospitalization rates and improved health-related quality of life. RBP-7000 (PERSERIS^®) is a monthly risperidone formulation (90 or 120 mg) for the treatment of schizophrenia administered by subcutaneous abdominal injection. The objective of this study was to assess a higher dose of 180 mg RBP-7000 and an alternate injection site.

Methods: Following stabilization on 6 mg/day (3 mg twice daily) oral risperidone, clinically stable schizophrenic participants received 3 monthly doses of 180 mg RBP-7000 in the abdomen followed by a fourth monthly dose of 180 mg RBP-7000 in the upper arm (each dose administered as two 90-mg injections). The primary endpoint was the steady-state average plasma concentration (C_avg(ss)) of risperidone and total active moiety after oral and RBP-7000 administration. Secondary endpoints included measures of clinical efficacy (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity of Illness), safety, and local injection-site tolerability to assess the switch from oral risperidone and compare injection sites.

Results: In all, 23 participants received at least one dose of RBP-7000, 16 received all four doses, and 15 completed the study. Monthly doses of 180 mg RBP-7000 provided similar C_avg(ss) of total active moiety compared with 6 mg/day oral risperidone. The pharmacokinetics of RBP-7000 were similar after injection in the abdomen versus upper arm. Clinical efficacy measures remained stable throughout the study. All RBP-7000 injections were well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings.

Conclusions: The results support the use of 180 mg RBP-7000 in schizophrenic patients stable on 6 mg/day oral risperidone and a second injection site in the upper arm.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03978832.

Background: Atopic dermatitis is characterized by persistent eczema and pruritus. Janus kinase inhibitors, including upadacitinib, are effective treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. If patients do not respond well to a certain dose of a Janus kinase inhibitor, increasing the dose may improve their treatment responsiveness.

Objectives: We assessed the outcomes of a dose increase in upadacitinib from 15 mg to 30 mg for Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Methods: In 23 patients who showed insufficient responses to upadacitinib 15-mg treatment, the dose of upadacitinib was increased to 30 mg. We evaluated total Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), EASI on the head and neck, trunk, upper, or lower limbs, EASI of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification, and Peak Pruritus Numerical-Rating Scale at baseline (onset of upadactinib 15 mg), week 0 (time of increase), and weeks 4 and 12 after the increase.

Results: Total EASI, EASI on each anatomical site, EASI of each clinical sign, and Peak Pruritus Numerical-Rating Scale were markedly reduced at weeks 4 or 12 compared with week 0. After the dose increase, the achievement rates of EASI 75 and EASI 90 significantly improved; EASI 75 4.3%, 68.2%, and 66.7%; EASI 90 0%, 18.2%, and 38.1% at weeks 0, 4, and 12, respectively.

Conclusions: These results suggest that upadacitinib 30 mg can ameliorate rash and pruritus insufficiently improved by upadacitinib 15 mg, and that the dose increase to 30 mg may be considered as a treatment option for patients with atopic dermatitis with a limited response to upadacitinib 15 mg.

Background: The efficacy of once-weekly (OW) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has been established in several trials in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, real-world evidence on their effectiveness is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of OW GLP-1RA regarding glycemic and weight outcomes, and relative to DPP-4i in a comparator analysis.

Methods: This observational cohort study evaluated glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) and weight outcomes in people with T2DM with two or more prescription claims for the same OW GLP-1RA using a pre-post study design (including for a semaglutide OW T2DM subgroup, hereafter referred to as semaglutide). Comparator analysis for the same outcome was performed for OW GLP-1RAs versus DPP-4i and semaglutide subgroup versus DPP-4i. A linked patient population from the IQVIA PharMetrics^® Plus database and the Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records (AEMR) database was analyzed using data from January 2017 to April 2022. HbA_1c and weight were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 12-month post-index period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics in the comparator analysis.

Results: In the pre-post analysis, a greater numerical reduction in HbA_1c and weight was observed for the semaglutide subgroup (N = 354) relative to the OW GLP-1RA cohort (N = 921). In the semaglutide subgroup, 52.5% and 34.2% of patients achieved HbA_1c of < 7.0% and ≥ 5% weight loss, respectively. For the comparator analysis, the OW GLP-1RAs (N = 651) were significantly more effective (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA_1c (- 1.5% vs. -  1.0%) and weight (- 3.2 kg vs. -  1.0 kg) than the DPP-4is (N = 431). Similarly, the semaglutide cohort (N = 251) also displayed more effectiveness (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA_1c (- 1.7% vs. -  0.9%) and weight (- 4.1 kg vs. -  1.3 kg) than the respective DPP-4i cohort (N = 417). Patients initiating OW GLP-1RAs, including the semaglutide cohort, were at least twice as likely to achieve HbA_1c and weight outcomes as well as composite outcomes compared with those initiating DPP-4is.

Conclusion: The study reinforces that OW GLP-1RAs are more effective in glycemic control and weight reduction compared with DPP-4is in people with T2DM in the real-world setting. These findings align with the recommendation in the current guidelines for utilizing glucose-lowering treatment regimens that support weight-management goals in people with T2DM.