Cassandra L. Boness, Rachel Hershenberg, Joanna Kaye, Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Damion J. Grasso, Amy Noser, Susan D. Raffa
The American Psychological Association's Society of Clinical Psychology recently adopted the “Tolin Criteria” to evaluate empirically supported treatments. These criteria better account for the strength and quality ofrapidly accumulating evidence bases for various treatments. Here, we apply this framework to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). Following procedures outlined by Tolin, McKay, et al. (2015), Step 1 included an examination of quantitative systematic reviews; nine met inclusion criteria. Step 2 evaluated review quality and effect size data. We found high-quality evidence that CBT-I produces clinically and statistically significant effects on insomnia and other sleep-related outcomes. Based on the Tolin Criteria, the literature merits a “strong” recommendation for CBT-I. This report is a working model for subsequent applications of the Tolin Criteria.
{"title":"An evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A systematic review and application of Tolin’s Criteria for empirically supported treatments","authors":"Cassandra L. Boness, Rachel Hershenberg, Joanna Kaye, Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Damion J. Grasso, Amy Noser, Susan D. Raffa","doi":"10.1111/cpsp.12348","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cpsp.12348","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The American Psychological Association's Society of Clinical Psychology recently adopted the “Tolin Criteria” to evaluate empirically supported treatments. These criteria better account for the strength and quality ofrapidly accumulating evidence bases for various treatments. Here, we apply this framework to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). Following procedures outlined by Tolin, McKay, et al. (2015), Step 1 included an examination of quantitative systematic reviews; nine met inclusion criteria. Step 2 evaluated review quality and effect size data. We found high-quality evidence that CBT-I produces clinically and statistically significant effects on insomnia and other sleep-related outcomes. Based on the Tolin Criteria, the literature merits a “strong” recommendation for CBT-I. This report is a working model for subsequent applications of the Tolin Criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":10434,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/cpsp.12348","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25455100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Maya Borgueta, Clare K. Purvis, Michelle G. Newman
Internet-guided self-help (IGSH) programs have proliferated recently to treat common mental health problems such as anxiety and depression. However, technology has outpaced the development of ethical guidelines for this mode of delivery. We examine ethical challenges in this new space, including defining the role “guides” play in treatment, crisis management, and user selection and screening. IGSH programs can provide safe and ethical care when they (a) coordinate care effectively with other systems; (b) provide competent and well-defined guidance; and (c) reach users that are appropriate for and well-educated about the services they are going to receive. We argue that jurisdictional practice constraints and outdated regulatory and ethical guidelines may impede the ability of IGSH programs to maintain or even improve performance when faced with greater demand, larger populations, heterogeneous settings, and the desire for large-scale dissemination.
{"title":"Navigating the ethics of Internet-guided self-help interventions","authors":"A. Maya Borgueta, Clare K. Purvis, Michelle G. Newman","doi":"10.1111/cpsp.12235","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cpsp.12235","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Internet-guided self-help (IGSH) programs have proliferated recently to treat common mental health problems such as anxiety and depression. However, technology has outpaced the development of ethical guidelines for this mode of delivery. We examine ethical challenges in this new space, including defining the role “guides” play in treatment, crisis management, and user selection and screening. IGSH programs can provide safe and ethical care when they (a) coordinate care effectively with other systems; (b) provide competent and well-defined guidance; and (c) reach users that are appropriate for and well-educated about the services they are going to receive. We argue that jurisdictional practice constraints and outdated regulatory and ethical guidelines may impede the ability of IGSH programs to maintain or even improve performance when faced with greater demand, larger populations, heterogeneous settings, and the desire for large-scale dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":10434,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2018-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/cpsp.12235","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25439822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号