首页 > 最新文献

Clinical lung cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with High PD-L1 Expression using Real World Evidence 高PD-L1表达的非小细胞肺癌的治疗模式和结果
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.003
Rosalyn Marar , Claire Bai , Eric Hansen , Christina M. Zettler , Andrew J. Belli , Laura L. Fernandes , Ching-Kun Wang , Kaushal Parikh

Purpose

This study analyzed the comparative effectiveness of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy versus ICI+chemotherapy (CIT) in the first-line (1L) setting among metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) patients with ≥ 50% programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) alterations.

Methods

Patients were identified from COTA’s real-world (rw) database meeting the criteria: aged ≥ 18 years at diagnosis with mNSCLC on or after January 1, 2017, ≥ 50% PD-L1 expression, negative for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 mutations, and received 1L ICI monotherapy or CIT. Characteristics and treatment patterns were summarized overall and by treatment group. Rw time to next treatment (rwTTNT), progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (rwOS) were summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to balance baseline characteristics for adjusted analyses.

Results

Of 311 patients, 178 received ICI monotherapy and 133 received CIT. Adjusted median rwTTNT was 11.31 months for the CIT group compared to 7.63 for the ICI group (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.93). Adjusted rwPFS for the CIT group vs. ICI group was 8.78 and 5.56 months, respectively (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61, 1.11), and adjusted median rwOS for CIT and ICI was 23.08 and 20.28 months, respectively (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.59, 1.18).

Conclusions

Although adjusted rwTTNT differed by treatment group, this did not translate to a significant difference in survival. Among mNSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression, the addition of chemotherapy to ICI did not improve survival.
目的:本研究分析了免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)单药治疗与ICI+化疗(CIT)在转移性NSCLC (mNSCLC)患者的一线(1L)治疗效果的比较,这些患者的程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达≥50%,且没有表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)和c-ros癌基因1 (ROS1)改变。方法:从COTA的真实世界(rw)数据库中确定符合以下标准的患者:2017年1月1日或之后诊断为mNSCLC时年龄≥18岁,PD-L1表达≥50%,EGFR, ALK和ROS1突变阴性,接受1L ICI单药治疗或CIT,总结总体和治疗组的特征和治疗模式。采用Kaplan-Meier方法总结Rw至下一次治疗时间(rwTTNT)、无进展生存期(rwPFS)和总生存期(rwOS)。采用逆概率处理加权法平衡基线特征进行调整分析。结果:在311例患者中,178例接受ICI单药治疗,133例接受CIT治疗,CIT组的调整中位rwTTNT为11.31个月,而ICI组为7.63个月(HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.93)。CIT组与ICI组的调整后rwPFS分别为8.78和5.56个月(HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61, 1.11), CIT组和ICI组的调整中位rwOS分别为23.08和20.28个月(HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.59, 1.18)。结论:尽管不同治疗组调整后的rwTTNT存在差异,但这并没有转化为生存率的显著差异。在PD-L1高表达的小细胞肺癌患者中,在ICI的基础上增加化疗并没有提高生存率。
{"title":"Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with High PD-L1 Expression using Real World Evidence","authors":"Rosalyn Marar ,&nbsp;Claire Bai ,&nbsp;Eric Hansen ,&nbsp;Christina M. Zettler ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Belli ,&nbsp;Laura L. Fernandes ,&nbsp;Ching-Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Kaushal Parikh","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study analyzed the comparative effectiveness of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy versus ICI+chemotherapy (CIT) in the first-line (1L) setting among metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) patients with ≥ 50% programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) alterations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were identified from COTA’s real-world (rw) database meeting the criteria: aged ≥ 18 years at diagnosis with mNSCLC on or after January 1, 2017, ≥ 50% PD-L1 expression, negative for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 mutations, and received 1L ICI monotherapy or CIT. Characteristics and treatment patterns were summarized overall and by treatment group. Rw time to next treatment (rwTTNT), progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (rwOS) were summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to balance baseline characteristics for adjusted analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 311 patients, 178 received ICI monotherapy and 133 received CIT. Adjusted median rwTTNT was 11.31 months for the CIT group compared to 7.63 for the ICI group (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.93). Adjusted rwPFS for the CIT group vs. ICI group was 8.78 and 5.56 months, respectively (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61, 1.11), and adjusted median rwOS for CIT and ICI was 23.08 and 20.28 months, respectively (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.59, 1.18).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although adjusted rwTTNT differed by treatment group, this did not translate to a significant difference in survival. Among mNSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression, the addition of chemotherapy to ICI did not improve survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages 564-572.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lymphovascular Invasion is a Predictor of Postoperative Recurrence or Death in Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) 淋巴血管侵袭是I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)术后复发或死亡的预测因子。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.07.001
Margaret Locke , Wint Yan Aung , Michael Esposito , Nagashree Seetharamu

Background

Histopathological features can be valuable prognostic tools in risk stratification of early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLC). This study evaluates the correlation between lymphovascular invasion (LVI), visceral pleural invasion (VPI), micropapillary pattern, and spread through airspaces (STAS) with outcomes in stage I NSCLC.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent lung resection at a single academic center between 2015 and 2019 with pathology confirming NSCLC. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or with stage II or above cancers were excluded. Records were reviewed for demographics, histopathological features, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), TNM staging (IASLC 8th edition), recurrence, and death. Recurrence free survival (RFS) was estimated via Kaplan–Meier Method. Correlation between STAS, VPI, LVI, micropapillary pattern, and patient outcomes was examined via multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results

A total of 596 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 35.3 months. Median RFS at 3 years was 88.4%. In multivariate analysis, LVI was an independent predictor for shorter RFS (HR = 4.19; 95% CI, 1.85-9.47; P < .001). Age > 75 and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were also found to be independent poor prognosticators. STAS, VPI, and micropapillary pattern had nonsignificant associations with RFS. A significant interaction was noted between LVI and adjuvant chemotherapy suggesting lower risk of recurrence (HR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P = .022).

Conclusions

LVI was a strong independent predictor associated with postoperative recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy, while associated with poor prognosis overall, seemed to decrease the risk of recurrence in patients whose tumors had LVI.
背景:在早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的危险分层中,组织病理学特征是有价值的预后工具。本研究评估了淋巴血管侵袭(LVI)、内脏胸膜侵袭(VPI)、微乳头状形态和通过空气扩散(STAS)与I期NSCLC预后的相关性。方法:回顾性分析2015年至2019年在单一学术中心行肺切除术且病理证实为非小细胞肺癌的患者。接受新辅助化疗或II期及以上癌症的患者被排除在外。回顾了人口统计学、组织病理学特征、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)、TNM分期(IASLC第8版)、复发和死亡的记录。通过Kaplan-Meier法估计无复发生存期(RFS)。通过多变量Cox比例风险回归模型检验STAS、VPI、LVI、微乳头形态与患者预后的相关性。结果:共纳入596例患者。中位随访时间为35.3个月。3年的中位RFS为88.4%。在多变量分析中,LVI是较短RFS的独立预测因子(HR = 4.19;95% ci, 1.85-9.47;P < 0.001)。年龄≥75岁和接受辅助化疗也被发现是独立的不良预后因素。STAS、VPI和微乳头型与RFS无显著相关性。LVI与辅助化疗之间存在显著的相互作用,提示复发风险较低(HR = 0.12;95% ci, 0.02-0.74;P = .022)。结论:LVI是与术后复发相关的一个强有力的独立预测因子。辅助化疗虽然总体上与预后不良相关,但似乎降低了LVI肿瘤患者的复发风险。
{"title":"Lymphovascular Invasion is a Predictor of Postoperative Recurrence or Death in Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)","authors":"Margaret Locke ,&nbsp;Wint Yan Aung ,&nbsp;Michael Esposito ,&nbsp;Nagashree Seetharamu","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Histopathological features can be valuable prognostic tools in risk stratification of early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLC). This study evaluates the correlation between lymphovascular invasion (LVI), visceral pleural invasion (VPI), micropapillary pattern, and spread through airspaces (STAS) with outcomes in stage I NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent lung resection at a single academic center between 2015 and 2019 with pathology confirming NSCLC. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or with stage II or above cancers were excluded. Records were reviewed for demographics, histopathological features, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), TNM staging (IASLC 8th edition), recurrence, and death. Recurrence free survival (RFS) was estimated via Kaplan–Meier Method. Correlation between STAS, VPI, LVI, micropapillary pattern, and patient outcomes was examined via multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 596 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 35.3 months. Median RFS at 3 years was 88.4%. In multivariate analysis, LVI was an independent predictor for shorter RFS (HR = 4.19; 95% CI, 1.85-9.47; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Age &gt; 75 and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were also found to be independent poor prognosticators. STAS, VPI, and micropapillary pattern had nonsignificant associations with RFS. A significant interaction was noted between LVI and adjuvant chemotherapy suggesting lower risk of recurrence (HR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; <em>P</em> = .022).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LVI was a strong independent predictor associated with postoperative recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy, while associated with poor prognosis overall, seemed to decrease the risk of recurrence in patients whose tumors had LVI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages e560-e565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144717656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Osimertinib Dose Optimization Guided by Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case series egfr突变晚期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗药物监测指导下的奥西替尼剂量优化:一个病例系列
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.012
Paul D. Kruithof , Anita J.W.M. Brouns , Juliette H.R.J. Degens , Lizza E.L. Hendriks , Dennis R. Wong , Robin M.J.M. van Geel , Sander Croes
  • High exposures of osimertinib are associated with toxicity, and evidence for efficacy at low exposures is scarce: therapeutic drug monitoring can be applied to minimize toxicity while maintaining expected effectiveness.
  • CYP3A polymorphisms may cause substantial deviations in osimertinib exposure, potentially leading to increased toxicity.
  • Comedication which induces CYP3A may substantially decrease osimertinib exposure, potentially resulting in subtherapeutic exposures.
•奥希替尼的高暴露与毒性有关,低暴露的有效性证据很少:治疗药物监测可用于在保持预期有效性的同时尽量减少毒性。CYP3A多态性可能导致奥西替尼暴露的实质性偏差,可能导致毒性增加。•诱导CYP3A的药物可能会大大减少奥西替尼的暴露,可能导致亚治疗暴露。
{"title":"Osimertinib Dose Optimization Guided by Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case series","authors":"Paul D. Kruithof ,&nbsp;Anita J.W.M. Brouns ,&nbsp;Juliette H.R.J. Degens ,&nbsp;Lizza E.L. Hendriks ,&nbsp;Dennis R. Wong ,&nbsp;Robin M.J.M. van Geel ,&nbsp;Sander Croes","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>High exposures of osimertinib are associated with toxicity, and evidence for efficacy at low exposures is scarce: therapeutic drug monitoring can be applied to minimize toxicity while maintaining expected effectiveness.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>CYP3A polymorphisms may cause substantial deviations in osimertinib exposure, potentially leading to increased toxicity.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Comedication which induces CYP3A may substantially decrease osimertinib exposure, potentially resulting in subtherapeutic exposures.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages e496-e502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144332570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Case of Retroperitoneal Fibrosis During Antiprogrammed Cell Death 1 Antibody Treatment 抗程序性细胞死亡1抗体治疗腹膜后纤维化1例。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.008
C. Kouroussis , L. Thanos , A. Tsipoura , G. Koulaxouzidis , V. Chaniotis
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, can rarely cause fibro-inflammatory reactions beyond classical immune-related adverse events (irAEs).
  • This is one of the very few histologically confirmed cases of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) following PD-1 blockade in a lung cancer patient.
  • The diagnosis of RPF should be considered in patients on immunotherapy who develop new abdominal symptoms, even mild or nonspecific ones.
  • Immunohistochemistry can aid in distinguishing idiopathic RPF from IgG4-related disease or other immune-mediated conditions.
  • Corticosteroid treatment led to rapid resolution of symptoms and radiological findings, supporting the immune-mediated mechanism of RPF.
•免疫检查点抑制剂,如派姆单抗,除了经典的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)外,很少引起纤维炎症反应。•这是肺癌患者PD-1阻断后很少的组织学证实的腹膜后纤维化(RPF)病例之一。•在接受免疫治疗的患者出现新的腹部症状时,即使是轻微或非特异性症状,也应考虑RPF的诊断。•免疫组织化学可以帮助区分特发性RPF与igg4相关疾病或其他免疫介导的疾病。•皮质类固醇治疗导致症状和放射检查结果的快速解决,支持RPF的免疫介导机制。
{"title":"A Case of Retroperitoneal Fibrosis During Antiprogrammed Cell Death 1 Antibody Treatment","authors":"C. Kouroussis ,&nbsp;L. Thanos ,&nbsp;A. Tsipoura ,&nbsp;G. Koulaxouzidis ,&nbsp;V. Chaniotis","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, can rarely cause fibro-inflammatory reactions beyond classical immune-related adverse events (irAEs).</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>This is one of the very few histologically confirmed cases of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) following PD-1 blockade in a lung cancer patient.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The diagnosis of RPF should be considered in patients on immunotherapy who develop new abdominal symptoms, even mild or nonspecific ones.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Immunohistochemistry can aid in distinguishing idiopathic RPF from IgG4-related disease or other immune-mediated conditions.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Corticosteroid treatment led to rapid resolution of symptoms and radiological findings, supporting the immune-mediated mechanism of RPF.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages 595-602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144697814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Osimertinib as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Real-World Setting: Updated Overall Survival Data (OSI-FACT-OS) 在现实世界环境中,奥西替尼作为晚期EGFR突变阳性非小细胞肺癌患者的一线治疗:更新的总生存数据(OSI-FACT-OS)
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.015
Yoshihiko Sakata , Go Saito , Shinya Sakata , Teppei Yamaguchi , Motohiro Tamiya , Hidekazu Suzuki , Ryota Shibaki , Asuka Okada , Toshihide Yokoyama , Hirotaka Matsumoto , Taiichiro Otsuki , Yuki Sato , Junji Uchida , Yoko Tsukita , Megumi Inaba , Hideki Ikeda , Daisuke Arai , Hirotaka Maruyama , Satoshi Hara , Shinsuke Tsumura , Takuro Sakagami

Background

Previously, we reported on osimertinib (OSI) as a first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm+ NSCLC) in a real-world setting. However, owing to the limited observation period, data on overall survival (OS) and long-term safety were not reported. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of OSI in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Patients and methods

We extended the observation period until July 2023 for 538 patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC who received OSI between August 2018 and December 2019.

Results

The median observation period was 37 months. The number of events was 392 (72.9%) for progression-free survival (PFS) and 285 (53%) for OS. The median PFS was 20.1 months (95% CI: 17.1-22.1) and median OS was 42.0 months (95% CI: 37.7-48.4). Safety data showed incidences of the following adverse events: pneumonitis (all grades/grade ≥ 3/grade 5), 90 (16.7%)/28 (5.2%)/5 (0.9%); grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity, 69 (12.8%); grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity, 34 (6.3%); QT prolongation (all grades/grade ≥ 3), 25 (4.6%)/8 (1.3%); and ejection fraction decrease and heart failure (all grades/grade ≥ 3), 14 (2.6%)/10 (1.9%). Regarding late adverse events manifesting after 1 year of treatment, 17 cases of pneumonitis and 7 cases of cardiotoxicity were recorded.

Conclusion

This study supports the long-term efficacy of OSI, with PFS and OS comparable to those in the FLAURA trial in a Japanese real-world setting. However, it highlights the need for careful and long-term safety monitoring throughout the treatment period.
背景:之前,我们报道了奥西替尼(OSI)作为EGFR突变阳性非小细胞肺癌(EGFRm+ NSCLC)的一线治疗方法。然而,由于观察期有限,没有报道总生存期(OS)和长期安全性的数据。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在评估OSI在EGFRm+ NSCLC患者中的长期疗效和安全性。患者和方法:我们将538例EGFRm+ NSCLC患者的观察期延长至2023年7月,这些患者在2018年8月至2019年12月期间接受了OSI治疗。结果:中位观察期37个月。无进展生存期(PFS)的事件数为392 (72.9%),OS的事件数为285(53%)。中位PFS为20.1个月(95% CI: 17.1-22.1),中位OS为42.0个月(95% CI: 37.7-48.4)。安全性数据显示以下不良事件的发生率:肺炎(所有等级/等级≥3/ 5级),90 (16.7%)/28 (5.2%)/5 (0.9%);非血液学毒性≥3级,69例(12.8%);血液学毒性≥3级,34例(6.3%);QT延长(所有分级/分级≥3),25 (4.6%)/8 (1.3%);射血分数下降和心力衰竭(所有等级/等级≥3),14(2.6%)/10(1.9%)。治疗1年后出现的晚期不良事件中,肺炎17例,心脏毒性7例。结论:本研究支持OSI的长期疗效,PFS和OS与日本FLAURA试验中的PFS和OS相当。然而,它强调需要在整个治疗期间进行仔细和长期的安全监测。
{"title":"Osimertinib as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Real-World Setting: Updated Overall Survival Data (OSI-FACT-OS)","authors":"Yoshihiko Sakata ,&nbsp;Go Saito ,&nbsp;Shinya Sakata ,&nbsp;Teppei Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Motohiro Tamiya ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Suzuki ,&nbsp;Ryota Shibaki ,&nbsp;Asuka Okada ,&nbsp;Toshihide Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Taiichiro Otsuki ,&nbsp;Yuki Sato ,&nbsp;Junji Uchida ,&nbsp;Yoko Tsukita ,&nbsp;Megumi Inaba ,&nbsp;Hideki Ikeda ,&nbsp;Daisuke Arai ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Maruyama ,&nbsp;Satoshi Hara ,&nbsp;Shinsuke Tsumura ,&nbsp;Takuro Sakagami","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previously, we reported on osimertinib (OSI) as a first-line treatment for <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (<em>EGFR</em>m+ NSCLC) in a real-world setting. However, owing to the limited observation period, data on overall survival (OS) and long-term safety were not reported. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of OSI in patients with <em>EGFR</em>m+ NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We extended the observation period until July 2023 for 538 patients with <em>EGFR</em>m+ NSCLC who received OSI between August 2018 and December 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median observation period was 37 months. The number of events was 392 (72.9%) for progression-free survival (PFS) and 285 (53%) for OS. The median PFS was 20.1 months (95% CI: 17.1-22.1) and median OS was 42.0 months (95% CI: 37.7-48.4). Safety data showed incidences of the following adverse events: pneumonitis (all grades/grade ≥ 3/grade 5), 90 (16.7%)/28 (5.2%)/5 (0.9%); grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity, 69 (12.8%); grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity, 34 (6.3%); QT prolongation (all grades/grade ≥ 3), 25 (4.6%)/8 (1.3%); and ejection fraction decrease and heart failure (all grades/grade ≥ 3), 14 (2.6%)/10 (1.9%). Regarding late adverse events manifesting after 1 year of treatment, 17 cases of pneumonitis and 7 cases of cardiotoxicity were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study supports the long-term efficacy of OSI, with PFS and OS comparable to those in the FLAURA trial in a Japanese real-world setting. However, it highlights the need for careful and long-term safety monitoring throughout the treatment period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages e623-e631.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144526724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Adherence in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients From a Large Multicenter Study 来自一项大型多中心研究的III期非小细胞肺癌患者多学科肿瘤治疗依从性的预测因素
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.010
Kira-Lee Koster , Sarvaganthasenay Yohasenan , Ahmet Samil Pakmak , Michael Mark , Yannis Metaxas , Carolin Lips , Felicitas Hitz , Pawel Leskow , Corinna Ludwig , Paul Martin Putora , Markus Glatzer , Tino Schneider , Claudio Caviezel , Thomas Mader , Mohsen Mousavi , Marcel Blum , Martin Früh , Markus Joerger

Background

While formalized treatment recommendations for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) have been associated with improved patient care and potentially improved survival, there is no data on the prognostic impact of individual adherence to initial MDT treatment recommendations in patients (pts) with stage III NSCLC.

Patients and methods

Multimodal treatment data for stage III NSCLC pts between 2014 and 2020 were collected from 3 Swiss referral centers. All pts underwent MDT before treatment. MDT-adherence was defined as implementation of the initially recommended treatment modalities and their sequence. Event-free survival (EFS) (primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) were subjected to Kaplan-Meier analysis, MDT adherence to multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results

Adherence to initial MDT recommendations was found in 385/547 (70.4%) eligible pts. Treatment de-escalation was the prominent feature in 109/162 (67.3%) non MDT-adherent pts, resulting in 89/547 (16.3%) pts receiving non-curative treatment. Pts ≥ 65 years of age had an increased risk for MDT nonadherence (32.8% vs. 23.0%, P = .02), as had pts with a higher tumor stage (19.8% for IIIA, 38.5% for IIIB, 43.3% for IIIC, P < .001) and frail (ECOG ≥ 2) pts (53.7% vs. 22.8%, P < .001). Median EFS was higher in MDT-adherent pts (11.9 months vs. 8.6 months (mo), P = 0.003), as was OS (20.3 mo vs. 9.4 mo, P < .001).

Conclusions

One third of stage III NSCLC pts is unable to adhere to initial MDT recommendations even in tertiary referral centers. Nonadherence was associated with worse outcome. Treatment strategies for vulnerable pts should critically be reviewed.
背景:虽然多学科肿瘤委员会(MDT)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的正式治疗建议与改善患者护理和潜在的生存率提高有关,但没有数据表明个体坚持初始MDT治疗建议对III期NSCLC患者的预后影响。患者和方法:从3个瑞士转诊中心收集了2014年至2020年期间III期NSCLC患者的多模式治疗数据。所有患者在治疗前均接受MDT。mdt依从性被定义为最初推荐的治疗方式及其顺序的实施。无事件生存期(EFS)(主要终点)和总生存期(OS)采用Kaplan-Meier分析,MDT依从性采用多变量Cox回归分析。结果:385/547(70.4%)符合条件的患者坚持最初的MDT建议。治疗降级是109/162(67.3%)非mdt依从患者的突出特征,导致89/547(16.3%)患者接受非治愈治疗。年龄≥65岁的患者MDT不依从风险增加(32.8%比23.0%,P = 0.02),肿瘤分期较高的患者(IIIA为19.8%,IIIB为38.5%,IIIC为43.3%,P < 0.001)和虚弱(ECOG≥2)的患者(53.7%比22.8%,P < 0.001)。mdt患者的中位EFS更高(11.9个月vs 8.6个月,P = 0.003), OS也更高(20.3个月vs 9.4个月,P < 0.001)。结论:三分之一的III期NSCLC患者即使在三级转诊中心也无法坚持最初的MDT建议。不依从与较差的结果相关。易感患者的治疗策略应严格审查。
{"title":"Predictors of Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Adherence in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients From a Large Multicenter Study","authors":"Kira-Lee Koster ,&nbsp;Sarvaganthasenay Yohasenan ,&nbsp;Ahmet Samil Pakmak ,&nbsp;Michael Mark ,&nbsp;Yannis Metaxas ,&nbsp;Carolin Lips ,&nbsp;Felicitas Hitz ,&nbsp;Pawel Leskow ,&nbsp;Corinna Ludwig ,&nbsp;Paul Martin Putora ,&nbsp;Markus Glatzer ,&nbsp;Tino Schneider ,&nbsp;Claudio Caviezel ,&nbsp;Thomas Mader ,&nbsp;Mohsen Mousavi ,&nbsp;Marcel Blum ,&nbsp;Martin Früh ,&nbsp;Markus Joerger","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While formalized treatment recommendations for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) have been associated with improved patient care and potentially improved survival, there is no data on the prognostic impact of individual adherence to initial MDT treatment recommendations in patients (pts) with stage III NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Multimodal treatment data for stage III NSCLC pts between 2014 and 2020 were collected from 3 Swiss referral centers. All pts underwent MDT before treatment. MDT-adherence was defined as implementation of the initially recommended treatment modalities and their sequence. Event-free survival (EFS) (primary endpoint) and overall survival<span> (OS) were subjected to Kaplan-Meier analysis, MDT adherence to multivariable Cox regression analysis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adherence to initial MDT recommendations was found in 385/547 (70.4%) eligible pts. Treatment de-escalation was the prominent feature in 109/162 (67.3%) non MDT-adherent pts, resulting in 89/547 (16.3%) pts receiving non-curative treatment. Pts ≥ 65 years of age had an increased risk for MDT nonadherence (32.8% vs. 23.0%, <em>P</em> = .02), as had pts with a higher tumor stage (19.8% for IIIA, 38.5% for IIIB, 43.3% for IIIC, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and frail (ECOG ≥ 2) pts (53.7% vs. 22.8%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Median EFS was higher in MDT-adherent pts (11.9 months vs. 8.6 months (mo), <em>P</em> = 0.003), as was OS (20.3 mo vs. 9.4 mo, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>One third of stage III NSCLC pts is unable to adhere to initial MDT recommendations even in tertiary referral centers. Nonadherence was associated with worse outcome. Treatment strategies for vulnerable pts should critically be reviewed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages e487-e495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144495030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Factors Associated With Patient-Provider Discussions About Lung Cancer Screening Using Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization 使用Andersen的健康服务利用行为模型评估肺癌筛查患者与提供者讨论相关因素。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.006
Owen Y. Cai , Jessica R. Fernandez , Melinda C. Aldrich , Jennifer Richmond

Background

Patient-provider shared decision-making discussions are an important component of lung cancer screening guidelines, but little is known about factors associated with these discussions among screening-eligible patients. We used Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization to examine factors associated with discussing LCS with a provider.

Patients

Data came from an online survey of N = 516 U.S. adults meeting United States Preventive Services Task Force LCS eligibility criteria (ie, were 50-80 years of age and had at least a 20-pack year history of tobacco use).

Methods

We used logistic regression to investigate whether having a LCS discussion was associated with predisposing factors (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] diagnosis), enabling factors (eg, having a primary care provider [PCP]), and need factors (eg, smoking history).

Results

About 36% participants had ever discussed LCS with a provider. Participants diagnosed with COPD (OR = 3.56, 95% CI, 1.90-6.67) and who had a first-degree relative with lung cancer (OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.02-3.09) had higher odds of LCS discussion than those without COPD and with no family history, respectively. Women had lower odds of LCS discussion than men (OR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.24-0.58). Participants with an income of $30,000 to $59,999 had higher odds of LCS discussion compared to those earning < $30,000 (OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.06-2.98). Not having a PCP (OR = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.21-0.72) and currently smoking (OR = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.18-0.79) were associated with lower odds of LCS discussion.

Conclusions

Future interventions are needed to ensure all LCS-eligible individuals have access to provider discussions about LCS.
背景:患者与提供者共同决策讨论是肺癌筛查指南的重要组成部分,但对符合筛查条件的患者中与这些讨论相关的因素知之甚少。我们使用Andersen的卫生服务利用行为模型来检查与提供者讨论LCS相关的因素。患者:数据来自一项在线调查,N = 516名符合美国预防服务工作组LCS资格标准的美国成年人(即50-80岁,至少有20包烟草使用史)。方法:我们使用逻辑回归来调查LCS讨论是否与诱发因素(如慢性阻塞性肺疾病[COPD]诊断)、使能因素(如有初级保健提供者[PCP])和需求因素(如吸烟史)相关。结果:约36%的参与者曾与医疗服务提供者讨论过LCS。诊断为COPD (OR = 3.56, 95% CI, 1.90-6.67)和有一级亲属患有肺癌(OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.02-3.09)的参与者分别比没有COPD和没有家族史的参与者有更高的LCS讨论几率。女性讨论LCS的几率低于男性(OR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.24-0.58)。与收入< 30,000美元的参与者相比,收入30,000美元至59,999美元的参与者有更高的LCS讨论几率(OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.06-2.98)。没有PCP (OR = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.21-0.72)和目前吸烟(OR = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.18-0.79)与LCS讨论的几率较低相关。结论:未来需要采取干预措施,以确保所有符合LCS条件的个体都能获得提供者关于LCS的讨论。
{"title":"Assessing Factors Associated With Patient-Provider Discussions About Lung Cancer Screening Using Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization","authors":"Owen Y. Cai ,&nbsp;Jessica R. Fernandez ,&nbsp;Melinda C. Aldrich ,&nbsp;Jennifer Richmond","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patient-provider shared decision-making discussions are an important component of lung cancer screening guidelines, but little is known about factors associated with these discussions among screening-eligible patients. We used Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization to examine factors associated with discussing LCS with a provider.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>Data came from an online survey of <em>N</em> = 516 U.S. adults meeting United States Preventive Services Task Force LCS eligibility criteria (ie, were 50-80 years of age and had at least a 20-pack year history of tobacco use).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used logistic regression to investigate whether having a LCS discussion was associated with predisposing factors (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] diagnosis), enabling factors (eg, having a primary care provider [PCP]), and need factors (eg, smoking history).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>About 36% participants had ever discussed LCS with a provider. Participants diagnosed with COPD (OR = 3.56, 95% CI, 1.90-6.67) and who had a first-degree relative with lung cancer (OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.02-3.09) had higher odds of LCS discussion than those without COPD and with no family history, respectively. Women had lower odds of LCS discussion than men (OR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.24-0.58). Participants with an income of $30,000 to $59,999 had higher odds of LCS discussion compared to those earning &lt; $30,000 (OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.06-2.98). Not having a PCP (OR = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.21-0.72) and currently smoking (OR = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.18-0.79) were associated with lower odds of LCS discussion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Future interventions are needed to ensure all LCS-eligible individuals have access to provider discussions about LCS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages e534-e542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Unsuccessful Steroid Tapering on Survival in Patients Treated for Radiation Pneumonitis Following Definitive Radiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 不成功的类固醇减量对非小细胞肺癌放射治疗后放射性肺炎患者生存的影响。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.002
Aya Ghaleb Hashim , Rasmus Froberg Brøndum , Martin Skovmos Nielsen , Kasper Lind Laursen , Sille Vestergaard , Wenja Heijkoop , Weronika Maria Szejniuk

Objectives

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) presents a significant concern in the management of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing definitive radiation therapy (RT). This study aims to investigate the clinical implication of unsuccessful steroid tapering due to rebound of respiratory symptoms in patients diagnosed with RP.

Materials and methods

This retrospective analysis included NSCLC patients treated with definitive RT between 2010 and 2020. Clinical data, steroid treatment outcome for RP, progression and survival data were collected. Patients were stratified based on RP diagnosis and successful or unsuccessful tapering of steroids due to rebound of respiratory symptoms. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed, P-values < .05 were considered significant.

Results

The cohort consisted of 273 patients. About 30.4% of patients (n = 83) developed RP. In the RP-group, 22.9% (n = 19) experienced unsuccessful tapering of steroid due to rebound of respiratory symptoms. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in those patients were 9.0 months (95% CI 6.4-13.8) and 22.2 months (95% CI 17.0-34.9) respectively, significantly shorter than median PFS of 14.8 months (95% CI 5.9-36.3) and OS of 43.4 months (95% CI 27.9-71.2) in patients with successful tapering. A multivariate Cox regression with time-varying covariates confirmed the significantly higher risk of progression and death in those patients.

Conclusion

Patients with RP who experienced unsuccessful tapering of steroids due to rebound of respiratory symptoms had a significantly higher risk of progression and death compared to RP patients with successful tapering of steroids. More frequent surveillance may be considered in those patients.
目的:放射性肺炎(RP)在局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受最终放射治疗(RT)时的管理中具有重要意义。本研究旨在探讨诊断为RP的患者因呼吸道症状反弹而导致类固醇减量不成功的临床意义。材料和方法:本回顾性分析包括2010年至2020年间接受明确RT治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者。收集临床数据、类固醇治疗RP的结果、进展和生存数据。根据RP诊断和因呼吸道症状反弹导致的类固醇减量成功或不成功对患者进行分层。使用Kaplan-Meier和log-rank分析估计生存率。进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:该队列包括273例患者。约30.4%的患者(n = 83)发生RP。在rp组中,22.9% (n = 19)的患者由于呼吸道症状的反弹而逐渐减少类固醇治疗失败。这些患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为9.0个月(95% CI 6.4-13.8)和22.2个月(95% CI 17.0-34.9),显著短于成功减量患者的中位PFS 14.8个月(95% CI 5.9-36.3)和OS 43.4个月(95% CI 27.9-71.2)。具有时变协变量的多变量Cox回归证实,这些患者的进展和死亡风险明显更高。结论:由于呼吸道症状反弹导致类固醇减量治疗失败的RP患者与类固醇减量治疗成功的RP患者相比,其进展和死亡的风险明显更高。这些患者可以考虑进行更频繁的监测。
{"title":"Impact of Unsuccessful Steroid Tapering on Survival in Patients Treated for Radiation Pneumonitis Following Definitive Radiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer","authors":"Aya Ghaleb Hashim ,&nbsp;Rasmus Froberg Brøndum ,&nbsp;Martin Skovmos Nielsen ,&nbsp;Kasper Lind Laursen ,&nbsp;Sille Vestergaard ,&nbsp;Wenja Heijkoop ,&nbsp;Weronika Maria Szejniuk","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Radiation pneumonitis (RP) presents a significant concern in the management of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing definitive radiation therapy (RT). This study aims to investigate the clinical implication of unsuccessful steroid tapering due to rebound of respiratory symptoms in patients diagnosed with RP.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis included NSCLC patients treated with definitive RT between 2010 and 2020. Clinical data, steroid treatment outcome for RP, progression and survival data were collected. Patients were stratified based on RP diagnosis and successful or unsuccessful tapering of steroids due to rebound of respiratory symptoms. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed, <em>P</em>-values &lt; .05 were considered significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort consisted of 273 patients. About 30.4% of patients (<em>n</em> = 83) developed RP. In the RP-group, 22.9% (<em>n</em> = 19) experienced unsuccessful tapering of steroid due to rebound of respiratory symptoms. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in those patients were 9.0 months (95% CI 6.4-13.8) and 22.2 months (95% CI 17.0-34.9) respectively, significantly shorter than median PFS of 14.8 months (95% CI 5.9-36.3) and OS of 43.4 months (95% CI 27.9-71.2) in patients with successful tapering. A multivariate Cox regression with time-varying covariates confirmed the significantly higher risk of progression and death in those patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with RP who experienced unsuccessful tapering of steroids due to rebound of respiratory symptoms had a significantly higher risk of progression and death compared to RP patients with successful tapering of steroids. More frequent surveillance may be considered in those patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages e517-e526.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144616627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy, is There a Role for Radiation Intensification Therapy in Patients With Stage III (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Undergo Surgery? Results of LUN17-321 in the Context of Current Clinical Treatment Options 在新辅助化学免疫治疗时代,放射强化治疗在III期(N2)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)手术患者中是否有作用?LUN17-321在当前临床治疗方案背景下的结果。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.001
Meagan Miller , Tim Lautenschlaeger , Thomas Birdas , Nasser Hanna , Greg Durm
Treatment options for resectable stage III (N2) NSCLC have evolved rapidly over the last few years. However, an optimal treatment strategy has yet to be determined. In the below article, we present the results of LUN17-321 in the context of current treatment options available.
可切除的III期(N2) NSCLC的治疗方案在过去几年中发展迅速。然而,一个最佳的治疗策略尚未确定。在下面的文章中,我们将在当前可用的治疗方案的背景下介绍LUN17-321的结果。
{"title":"In the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy, is There a Role for Radiation Intensification Therapy in Patients With Stage III (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Undergo Surgery? Results of LUN17-321 in the Context of Current Clinical Treatment Options","authors":"Meagan Miller ,&nbsp;Tim Lautenschlaeger ,&nbsp;Thomas Birdas ,&nbsp;Nasser Hanna ,&nbsp;Greg Durm","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Treatment options for resectable stage III (N2) NSCLC have evolved rapidly over the last few years. However, an optimal treatment strategy has yet to be determined. In the below article, we present the results of LUN17-321 in the context of current treatment options available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages e514-e516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144616628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Italian Mauris Phase IIIb Trial of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: 3-Year End-of-Study Results 意大利Mauris iii期ib试验Atezolizumab联合卡铂和依托泊苷治疗新诊断的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者:3年研究结束结果
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.07.003
Floriana Morgillo , Ester Del Signore , Emilio Bria , Filippo de Marinis , Fortunato Ciardiello , Marina Chiara Garassino , Alessio Stefani , Francesco Verderame , Alessandro Morabito , Andrea Sbrana , Giuseppe Tonini , Marina Gilli , Rossana Berardi , Paola Adriana Taveggia , Alessandra Bearz , Angelo Delmonte , Maria Rita Migliorino , Cesare Gridelli , Giovanni Maria Fadda , Manuela Iero , Andrea Ardizzoni

Background

Atezolizumab combined to carboplatin and etoposide prolonged survival in the IMpower133 trial of untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Aim of this analysis is to provide end-of-study results from the phase IIIb MAURIS study on the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in the same disease setting, in a patient population with broader inclusion criteria.

Materials and Methods

MAURIS is a multicentric, open-label, single-arm study conducted between 2019 and 2023 in 25 Italian study centres. A total of 155 patients with untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled. Treatment was based on atezolizumab 1200 mg + carboplatin + etoposide every 21 days, for 4 to 6 cycles, during the induction phase, and atezolizumab every 3 weeks during the maintenance phase. Safety, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were among study endpoints.

Results

The median OS at end of study was 10.6 months, with OS rates of 45.5% at 1 year, 31.0% at 1.5 years, 17.1% at 2 years and 14.5% at 3 years. The median PFS was 5.5 months. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38.3% of patients, treatment-related serious AEs in 21.4%, and immuno-mediated treatment-emergent AEs in 26.6% of patients. Immune-mediated grade 3 to 4 AEs were inversely related with mortality (hazard ratio, HR = 0.36; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.13-0.97) in a multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

This study showed consistent findings with the IMpower133 trial on the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Long-term survival of a subgroup of patients was also confirmed.
背景:在IMpower133试验中,Atezolizumab联合卡铂和依托泊苷延长了未经治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的生存期。本分析的目的是提供IIIb期MAURIS研究的研究结束结果,该研究在具有更广泛纳入标准的患者群体中,对atezolizumab加化疗在相同疾病环境下的疗效和安全性进行了研究。材料和方法:MAURIS是一项多中心、开放标签、单臂研究,于2019年至2023年在25个意大利研究中心进行。共有155名未经治疗的ES-SCLC患者入组。在诱导期,每21天使用atezolizumab 1200mg +卡铂+依托泊苷治疗4 - 6个周期,在维持期每3周使用atezolizumab治疗。研究终点包括安全性、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:研究结束时中位OS为10.6个月,1年OS率为45.5%,1.5年OS率为31.0%,2年OS率为17.1%,3年OS率为14.5%。中位PFS为5.5个月。38.3%的患者发生严重不良事件(ae), 21.4%的患者发生与治疗相关的严重ae, 26.6%的患者发生免疫介导的治疗突发ae。免疫介导的3 ~ 4级ae与死亡率呈负相关(风险比,HR = 0.36;95%可信区间(CI: 0.13-0.97)。结论:本研究与IMpower133试验在atezolizumab联合化疗一线治疗ES-SCLC的安全性和有效性方面的结果一致。一个亚组患者的长期生存也得到了证实。
{"title":"The Italian Mauris Phase IIIb Trial of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: 3-Year End-of-Study Results","authors":"Floriana Morgillo ,&nbsp;Ester Del Signore ,&nbsp;Emilio Bria ,&nbsp;Filippo de Marinis ,&nbsp;Fortunato Ciardiello ,&nbsp;Marina Chiara Garassino ,&nbsp;Alessio Stefani ,&nbsp;Francesco Verderame ,&nbsp;Alessandro Morabito ,&nbsp;Andrea Sbrana ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Tonini ,&nbsp;Marina Gilli ,&nbsp;Rossana Berardi ,&nbsp;Paola Adriana Taveggia ,&nbsp;Alessandra Bearz ,&nbsp;Angelo Delmonte ,&nbsp;Maria Rita Migliorino ,&nbsp;Cesare Gridelli ,&nbsp;Giovanni Maria Fadda ,&nbsp;Manuela Iero ,&nbsp;Andrea Ardizzoni","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Atezolizumab combined to carboplatin and etoposide prolonged survival in the IMpower133 trial of untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Aim of this analysis is to provide end-of-study results from the phase IIIb MAURIS study on the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in the same disease setting, in a patient population with broader inclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>MAURIS is a multicentric, open-label, single-arm study conducted between 2019 and 2023 in 25 Italian study centres. A total of 155 patients with untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled. Treatment was based on atezolizumab 1200 mg + carboplatin + etoposide every 21 days, for 4 to 6 cycles, during the induction phase, and atezolizumab every 3 weeks during the maintenance phase. Safety, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were among study endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median OS at end of study was 10.6 months, with OS rates of 45.5% at 1 year, 31.0% at 1.5 years, 17.1% at 2 years and 14.5% at 3 years. The median PFS was 5.5 months. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38.3% of patients, treatment-related serious AEs in 21.4%, and immuno-mediated treatment-emergent AEs in 26.6% of patients. Immune-mediated grade 3 to 4 AEs were inversely related with mortality (hazard ratio, HR = 0.36; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.13-0.97) in a multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study showed consistent findings with the IMpower133 trial on the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Long-term survival of a subgroup of patients was also confirmed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages 541-551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144752620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical lung cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1