Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2602004
N Zandstra, E Derksen, M F Miggiels, J J M Dekker, P Ten Klooster, A T F Beekman, M K van Dijk
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading contributor to disease burden. Although research shows that patients with MDD generally prefer psychotherapy, less than half achieve remission after psychotherapy. This highlights the need to understand which factors improve psychotherapy effectiveness for MDD. Therefore, this study explores the association between treatment integrity, defined by adherence to and competence in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and treatment outcome for MDD within a pragmatic randomized controlled (non-inferiority) trial comparing CBT and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP). Out of 77 cases (50% of the included CBT cases), two sessions per case (one from each half of treatment) were randomly selected and rated by two independent raters for adherence and competence using the Cognitive Therapy Adherence and Competence Scale (CTACS). Results showed competence, but not adherence, to be significantly associated with treatment outcome with a small effect size (ƒ2 = 0.059) similar to common factors such as goal consensus. Therapist competence in applying CBT appeared to be more important for treatment outcome than adherence to protocol. Prioritizing training therapists' skills in applying CBT-specific techniques over adherence to protocol could possibly enhance treatment outcomes in the future. Additional research to further unravel the treatment integrity-outcome relation is suggested.
{"title":"The association between treatment integrity and treatment outcome of cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder.","authors":"N Zandstra, E Derksen, M F Miggiels, J J M Dekker, P Ten Klooster, A T F Beekman, M K van Dijk","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2602004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2602004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading contributor to disease burden. Although research shows that patients with MDD generally prefer psychotherapy, less than half achieve remission after psychotherapy. This highlights the need to understand which factors improve psychotherapy effectiveness for MDD. Therefore, this study explores the association between treatment integrity, defined by adherence to and competence in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and treatment outcome for MDD within a pragmatic randomized controlled (non-inferiority) trial comparing CBT and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP). Out of 77 cases (50% of the included CBT cases), two sessions per case (one from each half of treatment) were randomly selected and rated by two independent raters for adherence and competence using the Cognitive Therapy Adherence and Competence Scale (CTACS). Results showed competence, but not adherence, to be significantly associated with treatment outcome with a small effect size (ƒ<sup>2</sup> = 0.059) similar to common factors such as goal consensus. Therapist competence in applying CBT appeared to be more important for treatment outcome than adherence to protocol. Prioritizing training therapists' skills in applying CBT-specific techniques over adherence to protocol could possibly enhance treatment outcomes in the future. Additional research to further unravel the treatment integrity-outcome relation is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2599349
Cleo Anderson, Jake Linardon
Apps can reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, yet their impact on broader functional outcomes remains less understood. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of mental health apps for depression and anxiety on quality of life, general wellbeing, and disability outcomes. Twenty-five RCTs were included. Most trials targeted depression (k = 14), while other trials targeted generalized anxiety (k = 3), mixed depression/anxiety (k = 5), social anxiety (k = 2) and panic (k = 1). Small, significant post-test pooled effect sizes were observed for quality of life (n = 17; g = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.28; I2 = 43%), general wellbeing (n = 14; g = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18, 0.50; I2 = 63%), and disability (n = 3; g = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.37; I2 = 46%) in favor of apps over controls. Effects remained significant when adjusting for various sources of biases and were primarily applicable to samples with depression. Meta-regression showed that the effect size of primary symptoms was related to the effect size for quality of life. At follow-up, the pooled effect size for wellbeing nearly doubled (n = 10; g = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39, 0.74; I2 = 56%), but became non-significant for quality of life (n = 7; g = 0.08; 95% CI = -0.08, 0.25; I2 = 65%). Apps designed for depression and anxiety may lead to acute improvements in broader functional outcomes.
应用程序可以减轻抑郁和焦虑的症状,但它们对更广泛的功能结果的影响尚不清楚。这项荟萃分析研究了心理健康应用程序对抑郁和焦虑的影响,包括生活质量、总体幸福感和残疾结果。纳入25项随机对照试验。大多数试验针对抑郁症(k = 14),而其他试验针对广泛性焦虑(k = 3),混合抑郁/焦虑(k = 5),社交焦虑(k = 2)和恐慌(k = 1)。在生活质量(n = 17; g = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.28; I2 = 43%)、总体幸福感(n = 14; g = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18, 0.50; I2 = 63%)和残疾(n = 3; g = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.37; I2 = 46%)方面,应用程序比对照组更有利。当调整各种偏差来源时,效果仍然显著,主要适用于抑郁症样本。meta回归显示,原发性症状的效应量与生活质量的效应量相关。在随访中,幸福感的综合效应量几乎翻了一番(n = 10; g = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39, 0.74; I2 = 56%),但生活质量的综合效应量变得不显著(n = 7; g = 0.08; 95% CI = -0.08, 0.25; I2 = 65%)。为抑郁和焦虑设计的应用程序可能会在更广泛的功能结果上带来急性改善。
{"title":"Can depression and anxiety apps improve quality of life, wellbeing, and disability outcomes? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Cleo Anderson, Jake Linardon","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2599349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2599349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Apps can reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, yet their impact on broader functional outcomes remains less understood. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of mental health apps for depression and anxiety on quality of life, general wellbeing, and disability outcomes. Twenty-five RCTs were included. Most trials targeted depression (k = 14), while other trials targeted generalized anxiety (k = 3), mixed depression/anxiety (k = 5), social anxiety (k = 2) and panic (k = 1). Small, significant post-test pooled effect sizes were observed for quality of life (<i>n</i> = 17; g = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.28; I<sup>2</sup> = 43%), general wellbeing (<i>n</i> = 14; g = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18, 0.50; I<sup>2</sup> = 63%), and disability (<i>n</i> = 3; g = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.37; I<sup>2</sup> = 46%) in favor of apps over controls. Effects remained significant when adjusting for various sources of biases and were primarily applicable to samples with depression. Meta-regression showed that the effect size of primary symptoms was related to the effect size for quality of life. At follow-up, the pooled effect size for wellbeing nearly doubled (<i>n</i> = 10; g = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39, 0.74; I<sup>2</sup> = 56%), but became non-significant for quality of life (<i>n</i> = 7; g = 0.08; 95% CI = -0.08, 0.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 65%). Apps designed for depression and anxiety may lead to acute improvements in broader functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145713497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2597844
David Potik, Yael Idisis, Tomer Einat
Previous research has demonstrated that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) frequently co-occur in military veterans and share similar adverse mental and behavioral health outcomes. While studies have established a robust association between PTSD and dissociative symptoms in veterans, evidence supporting a direct link between exposure to PMIEs and dissociative symptoms has largely been anecdotal. In this cross-sectional study, a volunteer sample of 189 Israeli male combat veterans completed validated self-report questionnaires assessing PTSD symptoms, exposure to PMIEs, and dissociative symptoms. The results show cooccurrence of PTSD symptoms and depersonalization and/or derealization symptoms, hereby suggesting the existence of a dissociative subtype of PTSD, characterized by elevated PTSD symptoms alongside persistent or recurrent symptoms of depersonalization and/or derealization. Moreover, PTSD symptoms were found to mediate the relationship between PMIE exposure and dissociative symptoms. Notably, one of the facets of exposure to PMIEs, the commission of moral transgressions, was significantly associated with depersonalization/derealization symptoms, suggesting a dissociative subtype of PMIE exposure. These findings provide empirical support for the trauma model, which conceptualizes dissociative symptoms as resulting from severe trauma, and underscore the importance of offering specialized treatments for veterans who report having committed moral transgressions.
{"title":"Is there a dissociative subtype of exposure to PMIEs among army veterans?","authors":"David Potik, Yael Idisis, Tomer Einat","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2597844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2597844","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) frequently co-occur in military veterans and share similar adverse mental and behavioral health outcomes. While studies have established a robust association between PTSD and dissociative symptoms in veterans, evidence supporting a direct link between exposure to PMIEs and dissociative symptoms has largely been anecdotal. In this cross-sectional study, a volunteer sample of 189 Israeli male combat veterans completed validated self-report questionnaires assessing PTSD symptoms, exposure to PMIEs, and dissociative symptoms. The results show cooccurrence of PTSD symptoms and depersonalization and/or derealization symptoms, hereby suggesting the existence of a dissociative subtype of PTSD, characterized by elevated PTSD symptoms alongside persistent or recurrent symptoms of depersonalization and/or derealization. Moreover, PTSD symptoms were found to mediate the relationship between PMIE exposure and dissociative symptoms. Notably, one of the facets of exposure to PMIEs, the commission of moral transgressions, was significantly associated with depersonalization/derealization symptoms, suggesting a dissociative subtype of PMIE exposure. These findings provide empirical support for the trauma model, which conceptualizes dissociative symptoms as resulting from severe trauma, and underscore the importance of offering specialized treatments for veterans who report having committed moral transgressions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2588173
Lars-Göran Öst, Martin Brattmyr, Pia Enebrink, Anna Finnes, Ata Ghaderi, Ingunn Hansdottir, Audun Havnen, Urdur Njardvik, Sigrid Salomonsson, Gro Janne Wergeland
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of different types of CBTs for ID in adults treated in routine clinical care. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase OVID, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for studies published until January 2025. The effectiveness of CBT, methodological quality, and moderators of treatment outcomes were examined and benchmarked by meta-analytically comparing them with efficacy studies for ID. Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 5231 participants. Very large within-group effect sizes (ES; Hedges' g) were obtained for ID-severity at post-treatment (1.87), and follow-up (1.68), on average 12 months post-treatment. Remission rates were 45% post-treatment and 51% at follow-up. Attrition rate was 13.9%. Risk of bias was considerable in the majority of studies. The benchmarking analysis showed that effectiveness studies (1.83) had almost exactly the same ES as efficacy studies (1.82) at post-treatment. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between effectiveness and efficacy studies on sleep diary measures, remission rates, and self-ratings of depression and anxiety. CBTs for ID are effective when delivered in routine clinical care, with ESs comparable to those found in efficacy studies. However, the evidence needs to be interpreted with caution because of the risk of bias in a high proportion of studies.Prospero registration id: CRD420251032141.
{"title":"Cognitive behavioral therapy for adult insomnia disorder in routine clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lars-Göran Öst, Martin Brattmyr, Pia Enebrink, Anna Finnes, Ata Ghaderi, Ingunn Hansdottir, Audun Havnen, Urdur Njardvik, Sigrid Salomonsson, Gro Janne Wergeland","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2588173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2588173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of different types of CBTs for ID in adults treated in routine clinical care. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase OVID, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for studies published until January 2025. The effectiveness of CBT, methodological quality, and moderators of treatment outcomes were examined and benchmarked by meta-analytically comparing them with efficacy studies for ID. Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 5231 participants. Very large within-group effect sizes (ES; Hedges' g) were obtained for ID-severity at post-treatment (1.87), and follow-up (1.68), on average 12 months post-treatment. Remission rates were 45% post-treatment and 51% at follow-up. Attrition rate was 13.9%. Risk of bias was considerable in the majority of studies. The benchmarking analysis showed that effectiveness studies (1.83) had almost exactly the same ES as efficacy studies (1.82) at post-treatment. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between effectiveness and efficacy studies on sleep diary measures, remission rates, and self-ratings of depression and anxiety. CBTs for ID are effective when delivered in routine clinical care, with ESs comparable to those found in efficacy studies. However, the evidence needs to be interpreted with caution because of the risk of bias in a high proportion of studies.<b>Prospero registration id</b>: CRD420251032141.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2597846
Amy R Senger, Zachary S Ayers, Michael J Zvolensky, Matthew W Gallagher
Gratitude and hope are established predictors of mental and physical health and well-being. Scarce literature investigates relevant mediators of these relationships in a single model and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study investigated the mediating role of health anxiety (measured three months after baseline) in the relationship of gratitude and hope at baseline with alcohol use, fatigue, pain, and well-being six months later. The sample was composed of 788 mostly male (58.1%), White (70.3%), middle-aged adults (Mage = 38.0, SD = 11.8). Structural equation models (SEM) were used to analyze the data. Gratitude at baseline's indirect effect of health anxiety three months later was both small and negative for alcohol use (ab = ‒.06, 95% CI [-.10, -.03]) and pain (ab = ‒3.01, 95% CI [-4.34, -1.68]). Health anxiety appears to be a robust mediator of the relationship between gratitude and mental and physical health outcomes. Hope was a stronger and more direct predictor of well-being compared to gratitude. The findings of this study may provide evidence for examining health anxiety levels as a risk factor when trying to promote resilience factors in individuals who report health issues, particularly during times of environmental contagion.
{"title":"Health anxiety as a mediator between resilience factors, and physical health and well-being over time during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Amy R Senger, Zachary S Ayers, Michael J Zvolensky, Matthew W Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2597846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2597846","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gratitude and hope are established predictors of mental and physical health and well-being. Scarce literature investigates relevant mediators of these relationships in a single model and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study investigated the mediating role of health anxiety (measured three months after baseline) in the relationship of gratitude and hope at baseline with alcohol use, fatigue, pain, and well-being six months later. The sample was composed of 788 mostly male (58.1%), White (70.3%), middle-aged adults (<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 38.0, <i>SD</i> = 11.8). Structural equation models (SEM) were used to analyze the data. Gratitude at baseline's indirect effect of health anxiety three months later was both small and negative for alcohol use (<i>ab</i> = ‒.06, 95% CI [-.10, -.03]) and pain (<i>ab</i> = ‒3.01, 95% CI [-4.34, -1.68]). Health anxiety appears to be a robust mediator of the relationship between gratitude and mental and physical health outcomes. Hope was a stronger and more direct predictor of well-being compared to gratitude. The findings of this study may provide evidence for examining health anxiety levels as a risk factor when trying to promote resilience factors in individuals who report health issues, particularly during times of environmental contagion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145653805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2595107
Dorian Kern, Brjánn Ljótsson, Sergiu-Bogdan Catrina, Nils Lindefors, Martin Kraepelien
{"title":"Digital tools for exposure and problem-solving in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a feasibility investigation","authors":"Dorian Kern, Brjánn Ljótsson, Sergiu-Bogdan Catrina, Nils Lindefors, Martin Kraepelien","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2595107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2595107","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"172 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145611506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2592230
Silje Haukenes Stavestrand, Kristine Sirevåg, Inger Hilde Nordhus, Karsten Specht, Helge Molde, Hans M. Nordahl, Trygve Bruun Endal, Julian F. Thayer, Trond Sjøbø, Jan Mohlman, Eva Andersson, Åsa Hammar, Anne Halmøy, Anders Hovland
{"title":"Physical exercise augments cognitive behaviour therapy for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Silje Haukenes Stavestrand, Kristine Sirevåg, Inger Hilde Nordhus, Karsten Specht, Helge Molde, Hans M. Nordahl, Trygve Bruun Endal, Julian F. Thayer, Trond Sjøbø, Jan Mohlman, Eva Andersson, Åsa Hammar, Anne Halmøy, Anders Hovland","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2592230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2592230","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145611504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2583119
Lyndsey N. Graham, Veronika Vozka, Dan Foti, Anne Wheeler, Kelly LeMaire, Allie Carter, Stephen Tueller, Mandy Rispoli, William Fadel, Wei Siong Neo, Kaleb Emerson, Riley Naughton, Eve Frank, Bridgette Kelleher
{"title":"Comparing evidence-based telemental health treatments for caregivers of children with Prader Willi and Williams syndromes: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes","authors":"Lyndsey N. Graham, Veronika Vozka, Dan Foti, Anne Wheeler, Kelly LeMaire, Allie Carter, Stephen Tueller, Mandy Rispoli, William Fadel, Wei Siong Neo, Kaleb Emerson, Riley Naughton, Eve Frank, Bridgette Kelleher","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2583119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2583119","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2589387
S. Demir, E.-L. Brakemeier, T. Kaiser
{"title":"Does structured, psychometrically based feedback discussion cause improvements of the therapeutic alliance? A single-case experimental study","authors":"S. Demir, E.-L. Brakemeier, T. Kaiser","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2589387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2589387","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2590537
Henrik Nordahl, Frederick Anyan, Eivind R. Strand, Peter Sævik, Henrik Jacobsson, Adrian Wells
The metacognitive model of psychological disorders emphasises common causal factors across psychopathologies and assigns a central role to maladaptation in metacognition. Metacognitions concerning the uncontrollability of thoughts are considered central, occurring in most disorders, whilst other more specific metacognitions, make additional contributions to particular disorders. The Meta-cognitions about Health Anxiety questionnaire (MCQ-HA) was developed to assess metacognitive beliefs relevant to health anxiety and includes three subdomains: beliefs that thoughts cause illness; beliefs about biased thinking; and beliefs that thoughts are uncontrollable. As these metacognitive domains may improve our understanding of health anxiety, the aim of the current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the MCQ-HA in a Norwegian sample and test the fit of the metacognitive model applied to health anxiety symptoms. Eight-hundred and thirty-nine participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a-priori three-factor solution of the MCQ-HA, with acceptable internal consistency and demonstrable convergent- and incremental validity. A test of the goodness of fit of a pre-specified metacognitive model of health anxiety based on associations indicated a good model fit. Our findings support the use of the MCQ-HA and support the metacognitive conceptualisation of health anxiety symptoms.
{"title":"Metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety: psychometric evaluation of the MCQ-HA and a test of the metacognitive model applied to health anxiety in a Norwegian sample","authors":"Henrik Nordahl, Frederick Anyan, Eivind R. Strand, Peter Sævik, Henrik Jacobsson, Adrian Wells","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2590537","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2590537","url":null,"abstract":"The metacognitive model of psychological disorders emphasises common causal factors across psychopathologies and assigns a central role to maladaptation in metacognition. Metacognitions concerning the uncontrollability of thoughts are considered central, occurring in most disorders, whilst other more specific metacognitions, make additional contributions to particular disorders. The Meta-cognitions about Health Anxiety questionnaire (MCQ-HA) was developed to assess metacognitive beliefs relevant to health anxiety and includes three subdomains: beliefs that thoughts cause illness; beliefs about biased thinking; and beliefs that thoughts are uncontrollable. As these metacognitive domains may improve our understanding of health anxiety, the aim of the current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the MCQ-HA in a Norwegian sample and test the fit of the metacognitive model applied to health anxiety symptoms. Eight-hundred and thirty-nine participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a-priori three-factor solution of the MCQ-HA, with acceptable internal consistency and demonstrable convergent- and incremental validity. A test of the goodness of fit of a pre-specified metacognitive model of health anxiety based on associations indicated a good model fit. Our findings support the use of the MCQ-HA and support the metacognitive conceptualisation of health anxiety symptoms.","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145545934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}