首页 > 最新文献

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
The association between treatment integrity and treatment outcome of cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder. 重度抑郁症认知行为疗法治疗完整性与治疗结果的关系。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2602004
N Zandstra, E Derksen, M F Miggiels, J J M Dekker, P Ten Klooster, A T F Beekman, M K van Dijk

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading contributor to disease burden. Although research shows that patients with MDD generally prefer psychotherapy, less than half achieve remission after psychotherapy. This highlights the need to understand which factors improve psychotherapy effectiveness for MDD. Therefore, this study explores the association between treatment integrity, defined by adherence to and competence in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and treatment outcome for MDD within a pragmatic randomized controlled (non-inferiority) trial comparing CBT and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP). Out of 77 cases (50% of the included CBT cases), two sessions per case (one from each half of treatment) were randomly selected and rated by two independent raters for adherence and competence using the Cognitive Therapy Adherence and Competence Scale (CTACS). Results showed competence, but not adherence, to be significantly associated with treatment outcome with a small effect size (ƒ2 = 0.059) similar to common factors such as goal consensus. Therapist competence in applying CBT appeared to be more important for treatment outcome than adherence to protocol. Prioritizing training therapists' skills in applying CBT-specific techniques over adherence to protocol could possibly enhance treatment outcomes in the future. Additional research to further unravel the treatment integrity-outcome relation is suggested.

重度抑郁症(MDD)是造成疾病负担的主要因素。尽管研究表明重度抑郁症患者通常更喜欢心理治疗,但只有不到一半的人在心理治疗后病情得到缓解。这凸显了了解哪些因素能提高重度抑郁症心理治疗效果的必要性。因此,本研究在一项比较CBT和短期心理动力支持性心理治疗(SPSP)的实用随机对照(非效性)试验中,探讨了治疗完整性(由认知行为疗法(CBT)的依从性和能力定义)与重度抑郁症治疗结果之间的关系。在77个病例中(占纳入CBT病例的50%),每个病例随机选择两个疗程(每一半治疗一个疗程),并由两个独立的评分者使用认知治疗依从性和能力量表(CTACS)对依从性和能力进行评分。结果显示,能力而非依从性与治疗结果显著相关,效应值较小(ƒ2 = 0.059),类似于目标共识等常见因素。对于治疗结果而言,治疗师应用CBT的能力似乎比依从治疗方案更重要。优先培训治疗师应用cbt特定技术的技能,而不是遵守协议,可能会在未来提高治疗效果。建议进一步研究以进一步揭示治疗完整性与结果的关系。
{"title":"The association between treatment integrity and treatment outcome of cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder.","authors":"N Zandstra, E Derksen, M F Miggiels, J J M Dekker, P Ten Klooster, A T F Beekman, M K van Dijk","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2602004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2602004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading contributor to disease burden. Although research shows that patients with MDD generally prefer psychotherapy, less than half achieve remission after psychotherapy. This highlights the need to understand which factors improve psychotherapy effectiveness for MDD. Therefore, this study explores the association between treatment integrity, defined by adherence to and competence in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and treatment outcome for MDD within a pragmatic randomized controlled (non-inferiority) trial comparing CBT and short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP). Out of 77 cases (50% of the included CBT cases), two sessions per case (one from each half of treatment) were randomly selected and rated by two independent raters for adherence and competence using the Cognitive Therapy Adherence and Competence Scale (CTACS). Results showed competence, but not adherence, to be significantly associated with treatment outcome with a small effect size (ƒ<sup>2</sup> = 0.059) similar to common factors such as goal consensus. Therapist competence in applying CBT appeared to be more important for treatment outcome than adherence to protocol. Prioritizing training therapists' skills in applying CBT-specific techniques over adherence to protocol could possibly enhance treatment outcomes in the future. Additional research to further unravel the treatment integrity-outcome relation is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145762424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can depression and anxiety apps improve quality of life, wellbeing, and disability outcomes? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 抑郁和焦虑应用程序能改善生活质量、健康和残疾结局吗?随机对照试验的meta分析。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2599349
Cleo Anderson, Jake Linardon

Apps can reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, yet their impact on broader functional outcomes remains less understood. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of mental health apps for depression and anxiety on quality of life, general wellbeing, and disability outcomes. Twenty-five RCTs were included. Most trials targeted depression (k = 14), while other trials targeted generalized anxiety (k = 3), mixed depression/anxiety (k = 5), social anxiety (k = 2) and panic (k = 1). Small, significant post-test pooled effect sizes were observed for quality of life (n = 17; g = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.28; I2 = 43%), general wellbeing (n = 14; g = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18, 0.50; I2 = 63%), and disability (n = 3; g = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.37; I2 = 46%) in favor of apps over controls. Effects remained significant when adjusting for various sources of biases and were primarily applicable to samples with depression. Meta-regression showed that the effect size of primary symptoms was related to the effect size for quality of life. At follow-up, the pooled effect size for wellbeing nearly doubled (n = 10; g = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39, 0.74; I2 = 56%), but became non-significant for quality of life (n = 7; g = 0.08; 95% CI = -0.08, 0.25; I2 = 65%). Apps designed for depression and anxiety may lead to acute improvements in broader functional outcomes.

应用程序可以减轻抑郁和焦虑的症状,但它们对更广泛的功能结果的影响尚不清楚。这项荟萃分析研究了心理健康应用程序对抑郁和焦虑的影响,包括生活质量、总体幸福感和残疾结果。纳入25项随机对照试验。大多数试验针对抑郁症(k = 14),而其他试验针对广泛性焦虑(k = 3),混合抑郁/焦虑(k = 5),社交焦虑(k = 2)和恐慌(k = 1)。在生活质量(n = 17; g = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.28; I2 = 43%)、总体幸福感(n = 14; g = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18, 0.50; I2 = 63%)和残疾(n = 3; g = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.37; I2 = 46%)方面,应用程序比对照组更有利。当调整各种偏差来源时,效果仍然显著,主要适用于抑郁症样本。meta回归显示,原发性症状的效应量与生活质量的效应量相关。在随访中,幸福感的综合效应量几乎翻了一番(n = 10; g = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39, 0.74; I2 = 56%),但生活质量的综合效应量变得不显著(n = 7; g = 0.08; 95% CI = -0.08, 0.25; I2 = 65%)。为抑郁和焦虑设计的应用程序可能会在更广泛的功能结果上带来急性改善。
{"title":"Can depression and anxiety apps improve quality of life, wellbeing, and disability outcomes? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Cleo Anderson, Jake Linardon","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2599349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2599349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Apps can reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, yet their impact on broader functional outcomes remains less understood. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of mental health apps for depression and anxiety on quality of life, general wellbeing, and disability outcomes. Twenty-five RCTs were included. Most trials targeted depression (k = 14), while other trials targeted generalized anxiety (k = 3), mixed depression/anxiety (k = 5), social anxiety (k = 2) and panic (k = 1). Small, significant post-test pooled effect sizes were observed for quality of life (<i>n</i> = 17; g = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.28; I<sup>2</sup> = 43%), general wellbeing (<i>n</i> = 14; g = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18, 0.50; I<sup>2</sup> = 63%), and disability (<i>n</i> = 3; g = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.37; I<sup>2</sup> = 46%) in favor of apps over controls. Effects remained significant when adjusting for various sources of biases and were primarily applicable to samples with depression. Meta-regression showed that the effect size of primary symptoms was related to the effect size for quality of life. At follow-up, the pooled effect size for wellbeing nearly doubled (<i>n</i> = 10; g = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.39, 0.74; I<sup>2</sup> = 56%), but became non-significant for quality of life (<i>n</i> = 7; g = 0.08; 95% CI = -0.08, 0.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 65%). Apps designed for depression and anxiety may lead to acute improvements in broader functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145713497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is there a dissociative subtype of exposure to PMIEs among army veterans? 在退伍军人中是否存在解离性暴露亚型?
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2597844
David Potik, Yael Idisis, Tomer Einat

Previous research has demonstrated that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) frequently co-occur in military veterans and share similar adverse mental and behavioral health outcomes. While studies have established a robust association between PTSD and dissociative symptoms in veterans, evidence supporting a direct link between exposure to PMIEs and dissociative symptoms has largely been anecdotal. In this cross-sectional study, a volunteer sample of 189 Israeli male combat veterans completed validated self-report questionnaires assessing PTSD symptoms, exposure to PMIEs, and dissociative symptoms. The results show cooccurrence of PTSD symptoms and depersonalization and/or derealization symptoms, hereby suggesting the existence of a dissociative subtype of PTSD, characterized by elevated PTSD symptoms alongside persistent or recurrent symptoms of depersonalization and/or derealization. Moreover, PTSD symptoms were found to mediate the relationship between PMIE exposure and dissociative symptoms. Notably, one of the facets of exposure to PMIEs, the commission of moral transgressions, was significantly associated with depersonalization/derealization symptoms, suggesting a dissociative subtype of PMIE exposure. These findings provide empirical support for the trauma model, which conceptualizes dissociative symptoms as resulting from severe trauma, and underscore the importance of offering specialized treatments for veterans who report having committed moral transgressions.

先前的研究表明,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状和暴露于潜在的道德伤害事件(pmii)经常同时发生在退伍军人身上,并且具有相似的不良心理和行为健康结果。虽然研究已经在退伍军人的创伤后应激障碍和解离症状之间建立了强有力的联系,但支持暴露于PMIEs和解离症状之间的直接联系的证据在很大程度上是轶事。在这项横断面研究中,189名以色列男性退伍军人志愿者完成了有效的自我报告问卷,评估创伤后应激障碍症状、暴露于PMIEs和解离症状。结果显示PTSD症状和人格解体和/或现实解体症状同时发生,因此提示存在一种分离性PTSD亚型,其特征是PTSD症状升高,同时持续或反复出现人格解体和/或现实解体症状。此外,PTSD症状被发现介导PMIE暴露与解离症状之间的关系。值得注意的是,接触PMIE的一个方面,即道德犯罪,与人格解体/现实感丧失症状显著相关,这表明PMIE暴露是一种分离亚型。这些发现为创伤模型提供了经验支持,该模型将分离症状概念化为严重创伤的结果,并强调了为报告犯下道德过失的退伍军人提供专门治疗的重要性。
{"title":"Is there a dissociative subtype of exposure to PMIEs among army veterans?","authors":"David Potik, Yael Idisis, Tomer Einat","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2597844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2597844","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) frequently co-occur in military veterans and share similar adverse mental and behavioral health outcomes. While studies have established a robust association between PTSD and dissociative symptoms in veterans, evidence supporting a direct link between exposure to PMIEs and dissociative symptoms has largely been anecdotal. In this cross-sectional study, a volunteer sample of 189 Israeli male combat veterans completed validated self-report questionnaires assessing PTSD symptoms, exposure to PMIEs, and dissociative symptoms. The results show cooccurrence of PTSD symptoms and depersonalization and/or derealization symptoms, hereby suggesting the existence of a dissociative subtype of PTSD, characterized by elevated PTSD symptoms alongside persistent or recurrent symptoms of depersonalization and/or derealization. Moreover, PTSD symptoms were found to mediate the relationship between PMIE exposure and dissociative symptoms. Notably, one of the facets of exposure to PMIEs, the commission of moral transgressions, was significantly associated with depersonalization/derealization symptoms, suggesting a dissociative subtype of PMIE exposure. These findings provide empirical support for the trauma model, which conceptualizes dissociative symptoms as resulting from severe trauma, and underscore the importance of offering specialized treatments for veterans who report having committed moral transgressions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive behavioral therapy for adult insomnia disorder in routine clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 认知行为疗法在成人失眠障碍的常规临床护理:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2588173
Lars-Göran Öst, Martin Brattmyr, Pia Enebrink, Anna Finnes, Ata Ghaderi, Ingunn Hansdottir, Audun Havnen, Urdur Njardvik, Sigrid Salomonsson, Gro Janne Wergeland

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of different types of CBTs for ID in adults treated in routine clinical care. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase OVID, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for studies published until January 2025. The effectiveness of CBT, methodological quality, and moderators of treatment outcomes were examined and benchmarked by meta-analytically comparing them with efficacy studies for ID. Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 5231 participants. Very large within-group effect sizes (ES; Hedges' g) were obtained for ID-severity at post-treatment (1.87), and follow-up (1.68), on average 12 months post-treatment. Remission rates were 45% post-treatment and 51% at follow-up. Attrition rate was 13.9%. Risk of bias was considerable in the majority of studies. The benchmarking analysis showed that effectiveness studies (1.83) had almost exactly the same ES as efficacy studies (1.82) at post-treatment. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between effectiveness and efficacy studies on sleep diary measures, remission rates, and self-ratings of depression and anxiety. CBTs for ID are effective when delivered in routine clinical care, with ESs comparable to those found in efficacy studies. However, the evidence needs to be interpreted with caution because of the risk of bias in a high proportion of studies.Prospero registration id: CRD420251032141.

对在常规临床护理中治疗的成人中不同类型的认知行为疗法进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Ovid和PsycINFO系统地检索了截至2025年1月发表的研究。通过将CBT的有效性、方法质量和治疗结果的调节因子与ID的疗效研究进行meta分析比较,对CBT的有效性、方法质量和治疗结果的调节因子进行了检验和基准分析。纳入32项研究,包括5231名参与者。在治疗后(1.87)和随访后(1.68),平均治疗后12个月的id严重程度获得了非常大的组内效应量(ES; Hedges' g)。治疗后缓解率为45%,随访时为51%。流失率为13.9%。在大多数研究中,偏倚风险是相当大的。基准分析显示,疗效研究(1.83)与疗效研究(1.82)在治疗后的ES几乎完全相同。此外,在睡眠日记测量、缓解率以及抑郁和焦虑的自我评定方面,有效性和有效性研究之间没有显著差异。cbt治疗ID在常规临床护理中是有效的,其ESs与疗效研究中的发现相当。然而,由于在很大比例的研究中存在偏倚风险,因此需要谨慎解释证据。普洛斯彼罗注册id: CRD420251032141。
{"title":"Cognitive behavioral therapy for adult insomnia disorder in routine clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lars-Göran Öst, Martin Brattmyr, Pia Enebrink, Anna Finnes, Ata Ghaderi, Ingunn Hansdottir, Audun Havnen, Urdur Njardvik, Sigrid Salomonsson, Gro Janne Wergeland","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2588173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2588173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of different types of CBTs for ID in adults treated in routine clinical care. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase OVID, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for studies published until January 2025. The effectiveness of CBT, methodological quality, and moderators of treatment outcomes were examined and benchmarked by meta-analytically comparing them with efficacy studies for ID. Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 5231 participants. Very large within-group effect sizes (ES; Hedges' g) were obtained for ID-severity at post-treatment (1.87), and follow-up (1.68), on average 12 months post-treatment. Remission rates were 45% post-treatment and 51% at follow-up. Attrition rate was 13.9%. Risk of bias was considerable in the majority of studies. The benchmarking analysis showed that effectiveness studies (1.83) had almost exactly the same ES as efficacy studies (1.82) at post-treatment. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between effectiveness and efficacy studies on sleep diary measures, remission rates, and self-ratings of depression and anxiety. CBTs for ID are effective when delivered in routine clinical care, with ESs comparable to those found in efficacy studies. However, the evidence needs to be interpreted with caution because of the risk of bias in a high proportion of studies.<b>Prospero registration id</b>: CRD420251032141.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health anxiety as a mediator between resilience factors, and physical health and well-being over time during the COVID-19 pandemic. 在COVID-19大流行期间,健康焦虑作为复原力因素与身体健康和福祉之间的中介。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2597846
Amy R Senger, Zachary S Ayers, Michael J Zvolensky, Matthew W Gallagher

Gratitude and hope are established predictors of mental and physical health and well-being. Scarce literature investigates relevant mediators of these relationships in a single model and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study investigated the mediating role of health anxiety (measured three months after baseline) in the relationship of gratitude and hope at baseline with alcohol use, fatigue, pain, and well-being six months later. The sample was composed of 788 mostly male (58.1%), White (70.3%), middle-aged adults (Mage = 38.0, SD = 11.8). Structural equation models (SEM) were used to analyze the data. Gratitude at baseline's indirect effect of health anxiety three months later was both small and negative for alcohol use (ab = ‒.06, 95% CI [-.10, -.03]) and pain (ab = ‒3.01, 95% CI [-4.34, -1.68]). Health anxiety appears to be a robust mediator of the relationship between gratitude and mental and physical health outcomes. Hope was a stronger and more direct predictor of well-being compared to gratitude. The findings of this study may provide evidence for examining health anxiety levels as a risk factor when trying to promote resilience factors in individuals who report health issues, particularly during times of environmental contagion.

感恩和希望是确定的心理和身体健康和幸福的预测因素。很少有文献在单一模型和COVID-19大流行期间调查这些关系的相关中介。目前的研究调查了健康焦虑(在基线后三个月测量)在基线时的感恩和希望与六个月后的酒精使用、疲劳、疼痛和幸福感之间的关系中的中介作用。样本由788人组成,主要为男性(58.1%),白人(70.3%),中年人(Mage = 38.0, SD = 11.8)。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对数据进行分析。三个月后,感恩对健康焦虑的间接影响很小,对饮酒的影响为负(ab = -)。06年,95% CI(.10 03])和疼痛(ab = -3.01, 95% CI[-4.34, -1.68])。健康焦虑似乎是感恩与心理和身体健康结果之间关系的强大中介。与感激相比,希望是幸福的更强、更直接的预测因素。这项研究的结果可能为在试图促进报告健康问题的个人的恢复力因素时,特别是在环境感染时期,将健康焦虑水平作为风险因素提供证据。
{"title":"Health anxiety as a mediator between resilience factors, and physical health and well-being over time during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Amy R Senger, Zachary S Ayers, Michael J Zvolensky, Matthew W Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2597846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2597846","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gratitude and hope are established predictors of mental and physical health and well-being. Scarce literature investigates relevant mediators of these relationships in a single model and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study investigated the mediating role of health anxiety (measured three months after baseline) in the relationship of gratitude and hope at baseline with alcohol use, fatigue, pain, and well-being six months later. The sample was composed of 788 mostly male (58.1%), White (70.3%), middle-aged adults (<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 38.0, <i>SD</i> = 11.8). Structural equation models (SEM) were used to analyze the data. Gratitude at baseline's indirect effect of health anxiety three months later was both small and negative for alcohol use (<i>ab</i> = ‒.06, 95% CI [-.10, -.03]) and pain (<i>ab</i> = ‒3.01, 95% CI [-4.34, -1.68]). Health anxiety appears to be a robust mediator of the relationship between gratitude and mental and physical health outcomes. Hope was a stronger and more direct predictor of well-being compared to gratitude. The findings of this study may provide evidence for examining health anxiety levels as a risk factor when trying to promote resilience factors in individuals who report health issues, particularly during times of environmental contagion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145653805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital tools for exposure and problem-solving in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a feasibility investigation 1型糖尿病暴露和问题解决的数字工具:可行性调查
IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2595107
Dorian Kern, Brjánn Ljótsson, Sergiu-Bogdan Catrina, Nils Lindefors, Martin Kraepelien
{"title":"Digital tools for exposure and problem-solving in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a feasibility investigation","authors":"Dorian Kern, Brjánn Ljótsson, Sergiu-Bogdan Catrina, Nils Lindefors, Martin Kraepelien","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2595107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2595107","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"172 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145611506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physical exercise augments cognitive behaviour therapy for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial 体育锻炼增强老年人广泛性焦虑症的认知行为治疗:一项随机对照试验
IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2592230
Silje Haukenes Stavestrand, Kristine Sirevåg, Inger Hilde Nordhus, Karsten Specht, Helge Molde, Hans M. Nordahl, Trygve Bruun Endal, Julian F. Thayer, Trond Sjøbø, Jan Mohlman, Eva Andersson, Åsa Hammar, Anne Halmøy, Anders Hovland
{"title":"Physical exercise augments cognitive behaviour therapy for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Silje Haukenes Stavestrand, Kristine Sirevåg, Inger Hilde Nordhus, Karsten Specht, Helge Molde, Hans M. Nordahl, Trygve Bruun Endal, Julian F. Thayer, Trond Sjøbø, Jan Mohlman, Eva Andersson, Åsa Hammar, Anne Halmøy, Anders Hovland","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2592230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2592230","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145611504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing evidence-based telemental health treatments for caregivers of children with Prader Willi and Williams syndromes: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes 比较Prader Willi和Williams综合征儿童看护者的循证远程心理健康治疗:可行性、可接受性和初步结果
IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2583119
Lyndsey N. Graham, Veronika Vozka, Dan Foti, Anne Wheeler, Kelly LeMaire, Allie Carter, Stephen Tueller, Mandy Rispoli, William Fadel, Wei Siong Neo, Kaleb Emerson, Riley Naughton, Eve Frank, Bridgette Kelleher
{"title":"Comparing evidence-based telemental health treatments for caregivers of children with Prader Willi and Williams syndromes: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes","authors":"Lyndsey N. Graham, Veronika Vozka, Dan Foti, Anne Wheeler, Kelly LeMaire, Allie Carter, Stephen Tueller, Mandy Rispoli, William Fadel, Wei Siong Neo, Kaleb Emerson, Riley Naughton, Eve Frank, Bridgette Kelleher","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2583119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2583119","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does structured, psychometrically based feedback discussion cause improvements of the therapeutic alliance? A single-case experimental study 结构化的、基于心理测量学的反馈讨论是否会导致治疗联盟的改善?单例实验研究
IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2589387
S. Demir, E.-L. Brakemeier, T. Kaiser
{"title":"Does structured, psychometrically based feedback discussion cause improvements of the therapeutic alliance? A single-case experimental study","authors":"S. Demir, E.-L. Brakemeier, T. Kaiser","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2589387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2589387","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety: psychometric evaluation of the MCQ-HA and a test of the metacognitive model applied to health anxiety in a Norwegian sample 健康焦虑的元认知信念:MCQ-HA的心理测量评估和挪威样本中健康焦虑的元认知模型测试
IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2025.2590537
Henrik Nordahl, Frederick Anyan, Eivind R. Strand, Peter Sævik, Henrik Jacobsson, Adrian Wells
The metacognitive model of psychological disorders emphasises common causal factors across psychopathologies and assigns a central role to maladaptation in metacognition. Metacognitions concerning the uncontrollability of thoughts are considered central, occurring in most disorders, whilst other more specific metacognitions, make additional contributions to particular disorders. The Meta-cognitions about Health Anxiety questionnaire (MCQ-HA) was developed to assess metacognitive beliefs relevant to health anxiety and includes three subdomains: beliefs that thoughts cause illness; beliefs about biased thinking; and beliefs that thoughts are uncontrollable. As these metacognitive domains may improve our understanding of health anxiety, the aim of the current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the MCQ-HA in a Norwegian sample and test the fit of the metacognitive model applied to health anxiety symptoms. Eight-hundred and thirty-nine participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a-priori three-factor solution of the MCQ-HA, with acceptable internal consistency and demonstrable convergent- and incremental validity. A test of the goodness of fit of a pre-specified metacognitive model of health anxiety based on associations indicated a good model fit. Our findings support the use of the MCQ-HA and support the metacognitive conceptualisation of health anxiety symptoms.
心理障碍的元认知模型强调跨精神病理学的共同因果因素,并在元认知中赋予适应不良的核心作用。关于思想的不可控性的元认知被认为是中心的,发生在大多数疾病中,而其他更具体的元认知,对特定的疾病有额外的贡献。健康焦虑元认知问卷(MCQ-HA)旨在评估与健康焦虑相关的元认知信念,包括三个子领域:思想导致疾病的信念;对偏见思维的信念;相信思想是无法控制的。由于这些元认知域可以提高我们对健康焦虑的理解,本研究的目的是评估挪威样本中MCQ-HA的心理测量特性,并测试应用于健康焦虑症状的元认知模型的拟合性。839名参与者完成了一系列自我报告问卷。验证性因子分析支持MCQ-HA的先验三因子解,具有可接受的内部一致性和可论证的收敛效度和增量效度。对预先设定的健康焦虑元认知模型进行了基于关联的拟合优度检验,模型拟合良好。我们的研究结果支持MCQ-HA的使用,并支持健康焦虑症状的元认知概念化。
{"title":"Metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety: psychometric evaluation of the MCQ-HA and a test of the metacognitive model applied to health anxiety in a Norwegian sample","authors":"Henrik Nordahl, Frederick Anyan, Eivind R. Strand, Peter Sævik, Henrik Jacobsson, Adrian Wells","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2590537","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2590537","url":null,"abstract":"The metacognitive model of psychological disorders emphasises common causal factors across psychopathologies and assigns a central role to maladaptation in metacognition. Metacognitions concerning the uncontrollability of thoughts are considered central, occurring in most disorders, whilst other more specific metacognitions, make additional contributions to particular disorders. The Meta-cognitions about Health Anxiety questionnaire (MCQ-HA) was developed to assess metacognitive beliefs relevant to health anxiety and includes three subdomains: beliefs that thoughts cause illness; beliefs about biased thinking; and beliefs that thoughts are uncontrollable. As these metacognitive domains may improve our understanding of health anxiety, the aim of the current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the MCQ-HA in a Norwegian sample and test the fit of the metacognitive model applied to health anxiety symptoms. Eight-hundred and thirty-nine participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a-priori three-factor solution of the MCQ-HA, with acceptable internal consistency and demonstrable convergent- and incremental validity. A test of the goodness of fit of a pre-specified metacognitive model of health anxiety based on associations indicated a good model fit. Our findings support the use of the MCQ-HA and support the metacognitive conceptualisation of health anxiety symptoms.","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145545934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1