Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107766
Jesse C. Christensen , Shuchi Anand , Glenn M. Chertow , Kate Lyden , Amara Sarwal , Terrence Bjordahl , Robert Boucher , Azeem Mohammed , Evan G. Oro , Farahnaz Akramimoghaddam , Niharika Katkam , Augustine Takyi , George Bissada , Akhil Ramanujam Chakravartula , Edison Lee , Ann Zheng , Guo Wei , Tom Greene , Srinivasan Beddhu
Background
Sedentary behavior is highly prevalent and associated with morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). A Sit Less, Interact and Move More (SLIMM) sedentary activity coaching intervention can reduce sedentary duration among persons with CKD, but preliminary data suggest that effects may not persist. Prior studies have suggested that moderate/vigorous intensity physical activities are not sustainable in persons with CKD. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether guided resistance training ± oral semaglutide co-intervention improves adherence and/or persistence of the SLIMM intervention.
Method/design
The SLIMM-2 is a two-center study designed with a 3-month sedentary activity coaching (SLIMM) followed by a 9-month randomized controlled trial with three arms: SLIMM + standard of care resistance training + oral placebo, SLIMM + guided resistance training + oral placebo, or SLIMM + guided resistance training + oral semaglutide. The study is recruiting persons with CKD (eGFR 20 to ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2). ActivPAL, a wearable tri-axial accelerometer, is used to assess outcomes including sedentary duration (primary outcome), stepping duration and the average number of steps per day. Additional outcomes include 6-min walk distance and body fat percentage. Persons randomized to standard of care resistance training will be encouraged to maintain individualized physical activity goals; those randomized to guided resistance training will attend guided sessions per month and be prescribed daily independent exercises.
Results
Enrollment, interventions, and follow-up are ongoing.
Conclusions
Results from the SLIMM-2 study are expected to inform clinical practice, with the potential to enhance physical health and functioning among persons with CKD.
{"title":"The Sit Less, Interact and Move More (SLIMM-2) Trial: Protocol for a randomized control trial of a sedentary behavior intervention, resistance training and semaglutide on sedentary behavior in persons with chronic kidney disease","authors":"Jesse C. Christensen , Shuchi Anand , Glenn M. Chertow , Kate Lyden , Amara Sarwal , Terrence Bjordahl , Robert Boucher , Azeem Mohammed , Evan G. Oro , Farahnaz Akramimoghaddam , Niharika Katkam , Augustine Takyi , George Bissada , Akhil Ramanujam Chakravartula , Edison Lee , Ann Zheng , Guo Wei , Tom Greene , Srinivasan Beddhu","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107766","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107766","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sedentary behavior is highly prevalent and associated with morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). A Sit Less, Interact and Move More (SLIMM) sedentary activity coaching intervention can reduce sedentary duration among persons with CKD, but preliminary data suggest that effects may not persist. Prior studies have suggested that moderate/vigorous intensity physical activities are not sustainable in persons with CKD. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether guided resistance training ± oral semaglutide co-intervention improves adherence and/or persistence of the SLIMM intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Method/design</h3><div>The SLIMM-2 is a two-center study designed with a 3-month sedentary activity coaching (SLIMM) followed by a 9-month randomized controlled trial with three arms: SLIMM + standard of care resistance training + oral placebo, SLIMM + guided resistance training + oral placebo, or SLIMM + guided resistance training + oral semaglutide. The study is recruiting persons with CKD (eGFR 20 to ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). ActivPAL, a wearable tri-axial accelerometer, is used to assess outcomes including sedentary duration (primary outcome), stepping duration and the average number of steps per day. Additional outcomes include 6-min walk distance and body fat percentage. Persons randomized to standard of care resistance training will be encouraged to maintain individualized physical activity goals; those randomized to guided resistance training will attend guided sessions per month and be prescribed daily independent exercises.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Enrollment, interventions, and follow-up are ongoing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results from the SLIMM-2 study are expected to inform clinical practice, with the potential to enhance physical health and functioning among persons with CKD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142750281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107784
Andrew J. Gawron , Travis Bailey , Rachel Codden , Jason Dominitz , Samir Gupta , Christian Helfrich , Charles Kahi , Lila Krop , Carmel Malvar , Grace McKee , Morgan Millar , Ashley Mog , Tiffany Nguyen-Vu , Olga Patterson , Angela P. Presson , Sameer Saini , Mary Whooley , Yiwen Yao , Susan Zickmund , Tonya Kaltenbach
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is a Veterans Affairs (VA) priority. Colonoscopy quality, especially adenoma detection rate (ADR), is critical for effective screening. Our research indicates considerable variation in ADR among VA providers. Even a slight increase in ADR can reduce fatal CRC rates, and audit and feedback strategies have improved ADR in other settings. A recent report identified deficiencies in VA colonoscopy quality, highlighting the need for standardized documentation and reporting. To address this, we developed the VA Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (VA-EQuIP), which aims to improve colonoscopy quality through benchmarking and collaborative learning, aligning with VA's modernization priorities and HSR&D and QUERI goals of accelerating evidence-based implementation.
Methods
We will conduct a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate whether VA-EQuIP improves provider ADR compared to usual care, the implementation of VA-EQuIP, site-level factors associated with colonoscopy quality improvement, and components of provider behavior change. Using mixed methods our study will measure outcomes like reach, implementation, adoption, maintenance of VA-EQuIP, and provider behavior change. The analysis will include primary and secondary outcomes, such as overall and screening ADR, cecal intubation rate, and bowel preparation quality, using mixed effects generalized linear models and interrupted time-series analyses. Adoption and implementation will be evaluated through usage statistics, surveys, and qualitative interviews to identify factors influencing success.
Discussion
This study will assess the impact of VA-EQuIP on colonoscopy quality metrics and factors associated with effective implementation. VA-EQuIP infrastructure allows for national-scale implementation and evaluation of quality reporting with minimal manual labor, guiding future quality improvement efforts to ensure optimal patient care.
{"title":"Improving colonoscopy quality in the national VA healthcare system","authors":"Andrew J. Gawron , Travis Bailey , Rachel Codden , Jason Dominitz , Samir Gupta , Christian Helfrich , Charles Kahi , Lila Krop , Carmel Malvar , Grace McKee , Morgan Millar , Ashley Mog , Tiffany Nguyen-Vu , Olga Patterson , Angela P. Presson , Sameer Saini , Mary Whooley , Yiwen Yao , Susan Zickmund , Tonya Kaltenbach","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107784","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107784","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is a Veterans Affairs (VA) priority. Colonoscopy quality, especially adenoma detection rate (ADR), is critical for effective screening. Our research indicates considerable variation in ADR among VA providers. Even a slight increase in ADR can reduce fatal CRC rates, and audit and feedback strategies have improved ADR in other settings. A recent report identified deficiencies in VA colonoscopy quality, highlighting the need for standardized documentation and reporting. To address this, we developed the VA Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (VA-EQuIP), which aims to improve colonoscopy quality through benchmarking and collaborative learning, aligning with VA's modernization priorities and HSR&D and QUERI goals of accelerating evidence-based implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We will conduct a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate whether VA-EQuIP improves provider ADR compared to usual care, the implementation of VA-EQuIP, site-level factors associated with colonoscopy quality improvement, and components of provider behavior change. Using mixed methods our study will measure outcomes like reach, implementation, adoption, maintenance of VA-EQuIP, and provider behavior change. The analysis will include primary and secondary outcomes, such as overall and screening ADR, cecal intubation rate, and bowel preparation quality, using mixed effects generalized linear models and interrupted time-series analyses. Adoption and implementation will be evaluated through usage statistics, surveys, and qualitative interviews to identify factors influencing success.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study will assess the impact of VA-EQuIP on colonoscopy quality metrics and factors associated with effective implementation. VA-EQuIP infrastructure allows for national-scale implementation and evaluation of quality reporting with minimal manual labor, guiding future quality improvement efforts to ensure optimal patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142892487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107782
Ahnalee M. Brincks , Kevin P. Haggerty , Alexandria Kolberg , Katie M. Albertson , Carolyn A. McCarty , Margaret R. Kuklinski , Ted Ryle , Kym R. Ahrens
Adolescents and young adults in the legal system (AYALS) are at high risk for opioid use disorder (OUD). Effective, efficient interventions to prevent OUD that support youth as they transition to the community are needed. The Positive Outcomes through Supported Transition intervention trial is designed to identify the optimal intensity and sequence of behavioral skills and case management components for OUD prevention.
This sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial addresses three research questions: 1.whether to begin with a high-intensity, broad-scope intervention (Enhanced Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach; E-ACRA) or a lower intensity intervention (Assertive Community Support; ACS), 2. whether to continue with E-ACRA or step-down to ACS after release, and 3. whether to step-up to E-ACRA or continue ACS for youth reporting problematic substance use after release.
Youth committed to state custody will be recruited prior to their release and randomized to E-ACRA or ACS. At five weeks post-release, E-ACRA participants will be re-randomized to E-ACRA or ACS. ACS participants reporting problematic substance use at five weeks will be re-randomized to E-ACRA or ACS. Primary analyses will test the effects of initial intervention (E-ACRA vs. ACS); secondary analyses will test the effects of second-stage interventions. Cost-effectiveness analysis will determine whether the additional resources deployed to E-ACRA are justified economically by the outcomes achieved.
Prevention is critical for this population. High-intensity interventions can be burdensome for participants (and agencies) and costly to deliver. This study examines how best to sequence high and low intensity interventions to maximize beneficial outcomes for the most youth.
This study's design was pre-registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04901312).
法律系统中的青少年和青壮年(AYALS)是阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的高危人群。我们需要采取有效、高效的干预措施,防止青少年染上毒瘾,支持他们向社区过渡。通过支持过渡干预的积极结果试验旨在确定行为技能和病例管理组成部分预防OUD的最佳强度和顺序。这个连续的、多任务随机试验解决了三个研究问题:1。是否从高强度、大范围的干预开始(强化青少年社区强化方法;E-ACRA)或低强度干预(自信社区支持;ACS), 2。2 .放行后是否继续使用E-ACRA或降压至ACS;是升级到E-ACRA还是继续对释放后报告有问题物质使用的青少年进行ACS。被国家拘留的青少年将在释放前被招募并随机分配到E-ACRA或ACS。在释放后5周,E-ACRA参与者将被重新随机分配到E-ACRA或ACS组。在5周后报告有问题物质使用的ACS参与者将被重新随机分配到E-ACRA或ACS组。初步分析将测试初始干预的效果(E-ACRA vs. ACS);二级分析将检验第二阶段干预措施的效果。成本效益分析将决定为E-ACRA部署的额外资源是否因取得的成果而在经济上是合理的。预防对这一人群至关重要。高强度干预措施对参与者(和机构)来说可能是负担,而且实施起来成本高昂。本研究探讨了如何最好地对高强度和低强度干预进行排序,以最大限度地为大多数年轻人带来有益的结果。本研究的设计已在clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04901312)预注册。
{"title":"Development of the Positive Outcomes through Supported Transition (POST) opioid preventive intervention for youth in the legal system: Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial","authors":"Ahnalee M. Brincks , Kevin P. Haggerty , Alexandria Kolberg , Katie M. Albertson , Carolyn A. McCarty , Margaret R. Kuklinski , Ted Ryle , Kym R. Ahrens","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107782","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107782","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adolescents and young adults in the legal system (AYALS) are at high risk for opioid use disorder (OUD). Effective, efficient interventions to prevent OUD that support youth as they transition to the community are needed. The Positive Outcomes through Supported Transition intervention trial is designed to identify the optimal intensity and sequence of behavioral skills and case management components for OUD prevention.</div><div>This sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial addresses three research questions: 1.whether to begin with a high-intensity, broad-scope intervention (Enhanced Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach; <em>E</em>-ACRA) or a lower intensity intervention (Assertive Community Support; ACS), 2. whether to continue with <em>E</em>-ACRA or step-down to ACS after release, and 3. whether to step-up to E-ACRA or continue ACS for youth reporting problematic substance use after release.</div><div>Youth committed to state custody will be recruited prior to their release and randomized to <em>E</em>-ACRA or ACS. At five weeks post-release, E-ACRA participants will be re-randomized to <em>E</em>-ACRA or ACS. ACS participants reporting problematic substance use at five weeks will be re-randomized to <em>E</em>-ACRA or ACS. Primary analyses will test the effects of initial intervention (E-ACRA vs. ACS); secondary analyses will test the effects of second-stage interventions. Cost-effectiveness analysis will determine whether the additional resources deployed to <em>E</em>-ACRA are justified economically by the outcomes achieved.</div><div>Prevention is critical for this population. High-intensity interventions can be burdensome for participants (and agencies) and costly to deliver. This study examines how best to sequence high and low intensity interventions to maximize beneficial outcomes for the most youth.</div><div>This study's design was pre-registered with <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT04901312</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142871570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107781
Sneha B. Sridhar , Assiamira Ferrara , Susan D. Brown , Charles P. Quesenberry , Fei Xu , Emily Liu , Tali Sedgwick , Page Kissel , Hillary D. Serrato Bandera , Cheryl Albright , Monique M. Hedderson
Background
More than half of pregnant patients with overweight or obesity exceed national gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. There is an urgent need to develop effective and scalable interventions to improve GWG.
Objective
To describe the protocol of Lifestyle, Eating, and Activity in Pregnancy (LEAP), a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a mobile health (mHealth) intervention promoting appropriate GWG in an integrated healthcare system.
Methods
LEAP is a cluster randomized trial with randomization at the clinician level. Patient eligibility includes a pre-pregnancy BMI of 25.0–40.0 kg/m2 and singleton pregnancy. Consented patients receive standard care or standard care plus mHealth intervention per their clinician's randomization. The patient adaptive intervention provides personalized, automated feedback on GWG and physical activity using 1) a smartphone application, 2) a Wi-Fi scale and activity tracker; 3) weekly educational topics; and 4) step-wise support (added when GWG is >75th percentile of the GWG guidelines). Intervention clinicians receive newsletters with motivational interviewing tips to facilitate discussing GWG. Primary outcomes are total GWG (last measured weight – pre-pregnancy weight) and weekly rate of GWG (total GWG/gestational weeks at delivery) as continuous variables and categorized per the IOM GWG guidelines. Secondary outcomes include trimester-specific rate of GWG, GWG trajectory, diet and physical activity, postpartum weight retention, birthweight, infant size for gestational age, and infant growth to 12 months.
Conclusions
LEAP addresses gaps in the implementation of GWG interventions in healthcare settings. The adaptive and mHealth nature of the intervention may enhance scalability.
{"title":"Protocol of an adaptive mobile health intervention for the management of gestational weight gain: The LEAP cluster randomized controlled trial","authors":"Sneha B. Sridhar , Assiamira Ferrara , Susan D. Brown , Charles P. Quesenberry , Fei Xu , Emily Liu , Tali Sedgwick , Page Kissel , Hillary D. Serrato Bandera , Cheryl Albright , Monique M. Hedderson","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107781","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107781","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>More than half of pregnant patients with overweight or obesity exceed national gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. There is an urgent need to develop effective and scalable interventions to improve GWG.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the protocol of <u><strong>L</strong></u>ifestyle, <u><strong>E</strong></u>ating, and <u><strong>A</strong></u>ctivity in <u><strong>P</strong></u>regnancy (LEAP), a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a mobile health (mHealth) intervention promoting appropriate GWG in an integrated healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>LEAP is a cluster randomized trial with randomization at the clinician level. Patient eligibility includes a pre-pregnancy BMI of 25.0–40.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and singleton pregnancy. Consented patients receive standard care or standard care plus mHealth intervention per their clinician's randomization. The patient adaptive intervention provides personalized, automated feedback on GWG and physical activity using 1) a smartphone application, 2) a Wi-Fi scale and activity tracker; 3) weekly educational topics; and 4) step-wise support (added when GWG is >75th percentile of the GWG guidelines). Intervention clinicians receive newsletters with motivational interviewing tips to facilitate discussing GWG. Primary outcomes are total GWG (last measured weight – pre-pregnancy weight) and weekly rate of GWG (total GWG/gestational weeks at delivery) as continuous variables and categorized per the IOM GWG guidelines. Secondary outcomes include trimester-specific rate of GWG, GWG trajectory, diet and physical activity, postpartum weight retention, birthweight, infant size for gestational age, and infant growth to 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LEAP addresses gaps in the implementation of GWG interventions in healthcare settings. The adaptive and mHealth nature of the intervention may enhance scalability.</div><div>Trial Registration: <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT03880461</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142876438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107804
Olayinka O. Shiyanbola , Martha A. Maurer , Megan E. Piper , Daniel Bolt , Lisa K. Sharp , Mariétou H. Ouayogodé , Edwin Fisher
Background
Black and Hispanic adults with diabetes are more likely to experience diabetes complications and die from diabetes compared to non-Hispanic whites. This disparity may be due to medication adherence being negatively affected by social determinants of health (SDOH) and negative beliefs about diabetes and diabetes medicines. Pharmacist delivered medication therapy management (MTM) improves clinical outcomes. However, pharmacists have limited capacity and expertise to address SDOH barriers and health misperceptions. Supplementing MTM with Community Health Workers (CHWs) to address these factors may be more effective with potential for implementation.
Aim
To investigate what combination of two possible components, pharmacist delivered MTM and CHWs addressing SDOH barriers and health misperceptions, represents the optimized intervention for Black and Hispanic adults with uncontrolled diabetes.
Methods/design
We will use a 2 × 2 factorial design (MTM, CHW: ON vs. OFF) where participants will be randomized to one of four treatment conditions in a 6-month intervention delivered mostly by phone. We will recruit 376 Black or Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1C of ≥8 %, a clinical indicator of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. The primary outcome is A1C measured at 6 months, and at 12 months for sustained change. The secondary outcome is medication adherence. Several psychosocial factors will be examined as potential mediators. An embedded experimental mixed methods approach will be used to obtain participant perspectives through qualitative interviews and integrated to assess intervention acceptability.
Discussion
Our findings will identify the optimized intervention, e.g., comprising MTM or CHW or both intervention components, that effectively and efficiently improves diabetes outcomes among Black and Hispanic adults with uncontrolled diabetes, informing dissemination.
背景:与非西班牙裔白人相比,黑人和西班牙裔成人糖尿病患者更容易出现糖尿病并发症并死于糖尿病。这种差异可能是由于药物依从性受到健康社会决定因素(SDOH)和对糖尿病和糖尿病药物的负面信念的负面影响。药师提供的药物治疗管理(MTM)改善了临床结果。然而,药剂师在解决SDOH障碍和健康误解方面的能力和专业知识有限。以社区卫生工作者(chw)补充MTM来解决这些因素可能更有效,具有实施潜力。目的:探讨药师提供MTM和CHWs解决SDOH障碍和健康误解的两种可能成分的组合,代表了黑人和西班牙裔成人未控制糖尿病的最佳干预措施。方法/设计:我们将采用2 × 2因子设计(MTM, CHW: ON vs. OFF),在为期6个月的主要通过电话提供的干预中,参与者将被随机分为四种治疗条件之一。我们将招募376名患有2型糖尿病且糖化血红蛋白≥8%(2型糖尿病未控制的临床指标)的黑人或西班牙裔成年人。主要结果是6个月时测量A1C, 12个月时测量持续变化。第二个结果是药物依从性。几个社会心理因素将作为潜在的中介进行检查。将采用嵌入式实验混合方法,通过定性访谈获得参与者的观点,并综合评估干预的可接受性。讨论:我们的研究结果将确定优化的干预措施,例如,包括MTM或CHW或两种干预成分,有效地改善黑人和西班牙裔成人未控制糖尿病的糖尿病结局,并为推广提供信息。
{"title":"Optimizing diabetes management interventions for Black and Hispanic adults using the multiphase optimization strategy: Protocol for a randomized mixed methods factorial trial","authors":"Olayinka O. Shiyanbola , Martha A. Maurer , Megan E. Piper , Daniel Bolt , Lisa K. Sharp , Mariétou H. Ouayogodé , Edwin Fisher","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107804","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107804","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Black and Hispanic adults with diabetes are more likely to experience diabetes complications and die from diabetes compared to non-Hispanic whites. This disparity may be due to medication adherence being negatively affected by social determinants of health (SDOH) and negative beliefs about diabetes and diabetes medicines. Pharmacist delivered medication therapy management (MTM) improves clinical outcomes. However, pharmacists have limited capacity and expertise to address SDOH barriers and health misperceptions. Supplementing MTM with Community Health Workers (CHWs) to address these factors may be more effective with potential for implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate what combination of two possible components, pharmacist delivered MTM and CHWs addressing SDOH barriers and health misperceptions, represents the optimized intervention for Black and Hispanic adults with uncontrolled diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods/design</h3><div>We will use a 2 × 2 factorial design (MTM, CHW: ON vs. OFF) where participants will be randomized to one of four treatment conditions in a 6-month intervention delivered mostly by phone. We will recruit 376 Black or Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1C of ≥8 %, a clinical indicator of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. The primary outcome is A1C measured at 6 months, and at 12 months for sustained change. The secondary outcome is medication adherence. Several psychosocial factors will be examined as potential mediators. An embedded experimental mixed methods approach will be used to obtain participant perspectives through qualitative interviews and integrated to assess intervention acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our findings will identify the optimized intervention, e.g., comprising MTM or CHW or both intervention components, that effectively and efficiently improves diabetes outcomes among Black and Hispanic adults with uncontrolled diabetes, informing dissemination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107804"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107833
Oscar Castro , Jacqueline Louise Mair , Shenglin Zheng , Sarah Yi Xuan Tan , Ahmad Ishqi Jabir , Xiaoxi Yan , Bibhas Chakraborty , E Shyong Tai , Rob M. van Dam , Florian von Wangenheim , Elgar Fleisch , Konstadina Griva , Tobias Kowatsch , Falk Müller-Riemenschneider
Background
Blended mobile health (mHealth) interventions – combining self-guided and human support components – could play a major role in preventing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs). This protocol describes a sequential, multiple assignment, randomised trial aimed at (i) evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LvL UP, an mHealth lifestyle intervention for the prevention of NCDs and CMDs, and (ii) establishing the optimal blended approach in LvL UP that balances effective personalised lifestyle support with scalability.
Methods
LvL UP is a 6-month mHealth holistic intervention targeting physical activity, diet, and emotional regulation. In this trial, young and middle-aged Singaporean adults at risk of developing NCDs or CMDs will be randomly allocated to one of two initial conditions (‘LvL UP’ or ‘comparison’). After 4 weeks, participants categorised as non-responders from the LvL UP group will be re-randomised into second-stage conditions: (i) continuing with the initial intervention (LvL UP) or (ii) additional motivational interviewing (MI) support sessions by trained health coaches (LvL UP + adaptive MI). The primary outcome is mental well-being. Secondary outcomes include anthropometric measurements, resting blood pressure, blood metabolic profile, health status, and health behaviours (physical activity, diet). Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 6 months (post-intervention), and 12 months (follow-up).
Discussion
In addition to evaluating the effectiveness of LvL UP, the proposed study design will contribute to increasing evidence on how to introduce human support in mHealth interventions to maximise their effectiveness while remaining scalable.
Trial registration
The LvL UP Pilot trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06360029).
{"title":"The LvL UP trial: Protocol for a sequential, multiple assignment, randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a blended mobile lifestyle intervention","authors":"Oscar Castro , Jacqueline Louise Mair , Shenglin Zheng , Sarah Yi Xuan Tan , Ahmad Ishqi Jabir , Xiaoxi Yan , Bibhas Chakraborty , E Shyong Tai , Rob M. van Dam , Florian von Wangenheim , Elgar Fleisch , Konstadina Griva , Tobias Kowatsch , Falk Müller-Riemenschneider","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107833","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107833","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Blended mobile health (mHealth) interventions – combining self-guided and human support components – could play a major role in preventing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs). This protocol describes a sequential, multiple assignment, randomised trial aimed at (i) evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LvL UP, an mHealth lifestyle intervention for the prevention of NCDs and CMDs, and (ii) establishing the optimal blended approach in LvL UP that balances effective personalised lifestyle support with scalability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>LvL UP is a 6-month mHealth holistic intervention targeting physical activity, diet, and emotional regulation. In this trial, young and middle-aged Singaporean adults at risk of developing NCDs or CMDs will be randomly allocated to one of two initial conditions (‘LvL UP’ or ‘comparison’). After 4 weeks, participants categorised as non-responders from the LvL UP group will be re-randomised into second-stage conditions: (i) continuing with the initial intervention (LvL UP) or (ii) additional motivational interviewing (MI) support sessions by trained health coaches (LvL UP + adaptive MI). The primary outcome is mental well-being. Secondary outcomes include anthropometric measurements, resting blood pressure, blood metabolic profile, health status, and health behaviours (physical activity, diet). Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 6 months (post-intervention), and 12 months (follow-up).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In addition to evaluating the effectiveness of LvL UP, the proposed study design will contribute to increasing evidence on how to introduce human support in mHealth interventions to maximise their effectiveness while remaining scalable.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>The LvL UP Pilot trial was prospectively registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT06360029</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 107833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143122269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107780
Zahra Hosseinian , Ashley Lehan , Jessica M. Powers , Adrian Melendez , Hannah M. Fisher , Rebecca Shelby , Tamara Somers , Francis Keefe , Judith Paice , Gretchen Kimmick , James Burns , Ann Marie Flores , Rina S. Fox , Karen Kaiser , David Farrell , Kelly Westbrook , Christine Rini
Background
Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a cornerstone of adjuvant systemic therapy for postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. Although AIs decrease cancer recurrence rates and improve survival rates, approximately 50 % of patients experience arthralgia—persistent pain related to worse patient outcomes and poor AI adherence. Current medical interventions for AI-associated arthralgia have limited efficacy and side effects that restrict their use among older patients.
Objective
The SKIP-Arthralgia trial will test the efficacy of Pain Coping Skills Training (PCST), a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-informed intervention, delivered via a web-based program called painTRAINER®. PCST and similar CBT-informed pain interventions are efficacious in non-cancer pain and commonly delivered via the Internet, although they have not been tested as a treatment for AI-associated arthralgia.
Methods
452 breast cancer survivors with AI-associated arthralgia will complete a baseline assessment before being randomized to either painTRAINER plus enhanced usual care (EUC; educational materials about AI therapy, arthralgia, and pain), or to EUC alone. Follow-up assessments will occur approximately 2 weeks after the 8- to 10-week intervention period (post-intervention) and at 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Primary outcomes are pain severity and interference at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include emotional distress, AI adherence, and health-related quality of life.
Discussion
This trial aims to fill a gap in evidence-based behavioral pain interventions for breast cancer survivors with AI-associated arthralgia by providing an effective, accessible intervention that could be implemented quickly, including in areas with limited PCST access. If successful, this study could enhance health outcomes for breast cancer survivors on AI therapy and improve adherence to this life-saving medication.
{"title":"Web-Based Pain Coping Skills Training (PCST) for Managing Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia in Breast Cancer Survivors: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol","authors":"Zahra Hosseinian , Ashley Lehan , Jessica M. Powers , Adrian Melendez , Hannah M. Fisher , Rebecca Shelby , Tamara Somers , Francis Keefe , Judith Paice , Gretchen Kimmick , James Burns , Ann Marie Flores , Rina S. Fox , Karen Kaiser , David Farrell , Kelly Westbrook , Christine Rini","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107780","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107780","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a cornerstone of adjuvant systemic therapy for postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. Although AIs decrease cancer recurrence rates and improve survival rates, approximately 50 % of patients experience arthralgia—persistent pain related to worse patient outcomes and poor AI adherence. Current medical interventions for AI-associated arthralgia have limited efficacy and side effects that restrict their use among older patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The SKIP-Arthralgia trial will test the efficacy of Pain Coping Skills Training (PCST), a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-informed intervention, delivered via a web-based program called painTRAINER®. PCST and similar CBT-informed pain interventions are efficacious in non-cancer pain and commonly delivered via the Internet, although they have not been tested as a treatment for AI-associated arthralgia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>452 breast cancer survivors with AI-associated arthralgia will complete a baseline assessment before being randomized to either painTRAINER plus enhanced usual care (EUC; educational materials about AI therapy, arthralgia, and pain), or to EUC alone. Follow-up assessments will occur approximately 2 weeks after the 8- to 10-week intervention period (post-intervention) and at 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Primary outcomes are pain severity and interference at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include emotional distress, AI adherence, and health-related quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This trial aims to fill a gap in evidence-based behavioral pain interventions for breast cancer survivors with AI-associated arthralgia by providing an effective, accessible intervention that could be implemented quickly, including in areas with limited PCST access. If successful, this study could enhance health outcomes for breast cancer survivors on AI therapy and improve adherence to this life-saving medication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142871571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107797
Beatrice Fadrigon , Ariel Tseng , Rachel L. Weisenburger , Andrew Levihn-Coon , Mary E. McNamara , Jason Shumake , Jasper A.J. Smits , Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary , Christopher G. Beevers
Cognitive models posit that negatively biased attention toward dysphoric information has a causal role in the maintenance of depression-related psychopathology. Attention bias modification (ABM) tests this idea by altering an attentional bias and examining subsequent effects on depression. Prior work finds that ABM alters negatively biased attention for dysphoric information and reduces depression; however, a number of studies have failed to show these effects. Other research suggests that adding game-like elements (i.e.game play, achievements, levels, challenges, and points) to cognitive training can enhance participant engagement. No prior work has examined the efficacy of gamified ABM for depression. The goal of this study is to conduct a large (N = 600) efficacy trial comparing gamified, mobile ABM and traditional, web-based ABM to traditional, web-based sham ABM among adults with elevated symptoms of depression. Participants in all conditions are asked to complete 16 ABM sessions across a four week period (i.e., 4 training sessions per week). We hypothesize that gamified and traditional ABM will lead to significantly greater reductions in self-reported and interviewer-rated depression symptoms than traditional sham ABM. We further hypothesize that gamified ABM will be non-inferior to traditional ABM. Our third hypothesis is that people with a strong attentional bias will experience greater reductions in depression in response to either gamified or traditional ABM compared to sham ABM. Secondary analyses will examine putative mediators of ABM. Finally, we will estimate the durability of ABM by collecting post-treatment symptom data 2-, 3-, and 6-months after the acute ABM period.
{"title":"Efficacy of traditional and gamified attention bias modification for depression: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Beatrice Fadrigon , Ariel Tseng , Rachel L. Weisenburger , Andrew Levihn-Coon , Mary E. McNamara , Jason Shumake , Jasper A.J. Smits , Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary , Christopher G. Beevers","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107797","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107797","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive models posit that negatively biased attention toward dysphoric information has a causal role in the maintenance of depression-related psychopathology. Attention bias modification (ABM) tests this idea by altering an attentional bias and examining subsequent effects on depression. Prior work finds that ABM alters negatively biased attention for dysphoric information and reduces depression; however, a number of studies have failed to show these effects. Other research suggests that adding game-like elements (i.e.game play, achievements, levels, challenges, and points) to cognitive training can enhance participant engagement. No prior work has examined the efficacy of gamified ABM for depression. The goal of this study is to conduct a large (<em>N</em> = 600) efficacy trial comparing gamified, mobile ABM and traditional, web-based ABM to traditional, web-based sham ABM among adults with elevated symptoms of depression. Participants in all conditions are asked to complete 16 ABM sessions across a four week period (i.e., 4 training sessions per week). We hypothesize that gamified and traditional ABM will lead to significantly greater reductions in self-reported and interviewer-rated depression symptoms than traditional sham ABM. We further hypothesize that gamified ABM will be non-inferior to traditional ABM. Our third hypothesis is that people with a strong attentional bias will experience greater reductions in depression in response to either gamified or traditional ABM compared to sham ABM. Secondary analyses will examine putative mediators of ABM. Finally, we will estimate the durability of ABM by collecting post-treatment symptom data 2-, 3-, and 6-months after the acute ABM period.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> ID: <span><span>NCT06361095</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107797"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142892469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The social information processing (SIP) model of trauma and intimate partner violence (IPV), which emphasizes the impact of trauma on one's ability to accurately process social information and subsequent failure to generate and enact nonaggressive responses, has gained attention in the United States. Recent clinical trial evidence suggests that the Strength at Home (SAH) intervention, a 12-session program that is based on this model, is efficacious in reducing and ending abusive behavior among U.S. veterans. However, such a clinical trial has yet to be conducted among a civilian population nor in a different cultural context (e.g., Israel). This paper describes the methods of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of SAH compared to a treatment as usual comparison condition in Israel.
Methods
300 men referred (court-, clinically-, and self-referred) to IPV intervention from adult outpatient clinics at Social Affairs and Social Services offices in Israel will be randomly assigned to the SAH intervention or a treatment-as-usual comparison group. Outcomes are measured at six timepoints (baseline, post-treatment, and four 3-month follow-ups). The primary outcome is use of IPV; however, we will also examine reductions in SIP deficits. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety, and changes in emotion regulation strategies.
Conclusion
Study findings will determine the efficacy of SAH in a civilian population and in a different cultural context. Additionally, findings will determine whether SIP is a mechanism of change for such intervention.
{"title":"Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of strength at home in Israel: A trauma informed intervention for intimate partner violence based on a social-information processing model","authors":"Ohad Gilbar , Liron Cohen , Madeline Smethurst , Suzannah Creech , Ziv Azaria-Mizrachi , Naomi Ben-Gal , Casey Taft","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107775","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107775","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The social information processing (SIP) model of trauma and intimate partner violence (IPV), which emphasizes the impact of trauma on one's ability to accurately process social information and subsequent failure to generate and enact nonaggressive responses, has gained attention in the United States. Recent clinical trial evidence suggests that the Strength at Home (SAH) intervention, a 12-session program that is based on this model, is efficacious in reducing and ending abusive behavior among U.S. veterans. However, such a clinical trial has yet to be conducted among a civilian population nor in a different cultural context (e.g., Israel). This paper describes the methods of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of SAH compared to a treatment as usual comparison condition in Israel.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>300 men referred (court-, clinically-, and self-referred) to IPV intervention from adult outpatient clinics at Social Affairs and Social Services offices in Israel will be randomly assigned to the SAH intervention or a treatment-as-usual comparison group. Outcomes are measured at six timepoints (baseline, post-treatment, and four 3-month follow-ups). The primary outcome is use of IPV; however, we will also examine reductions in SIP deficits. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety, and changes in emotion regulation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Study findings will determine the efficacy of SAH in a civilian population and in a different cultural context. Additionally, findings will determine whether SIP is a mechanism of change for such intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142821899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107785
Jolin B. Yamin , Bethany D. Pester , Ramya Kommu , Caroline Allen , Diya Dharmendran , Kylie Steinhilber , Madelyn Crago , Savannah Kazemipour , Angelina Franqueiro , Delia Fentazi , Kristin L. Schreiber , Robert R. Edwards , Robert N. Jamison , Samantha M. Meints
Background
Back pain is increasingly common, leading to more spine surgeries. While most people experience pain relief and improved function after surgery, many continue to suffer from chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) with limited functional improvement. CPSP is often treated with opioids, raising concerns about misuse, poor functional outcomes, and broader public health impacts. Therefore, perioperative interventions are needed to enhance outcomes and reduce the risk of opioid misuse after surgery.
Objective
This article outlines a study protocol evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a brief, perioperative Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention aimed at improving pain and reducing opioid use after spine surgery.
Design
In this pilot randomized controlled trial, participants scheduled for spine surgery (anticipated N = 100) are assigned to the ACT intervention or a treatment-as-usual group.
Intervention
The ACT intervention is a 5-h, single-session, virtual workshop with a booster call two weeks post-workshop or post-surgery, whichever is later.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome is patient-reported treatment helpfulness immediately after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported treatment credibility and expectancy post-intervention, treatment helpfulness at 1 month post-surgery, and pain interference, pain intensity and opioid use at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery.
Conclusion
This pilot trial examines a novel, brief ACT intervention aimed at preventing CPSP and reducing opioid dependence. If successful, feasibility and preliminary efficacy results will be utilized to inform a future, full-scale randomized trial of this intervention.
{"title":"A one-day acceptance and commitment therapy workshop for the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain and long-term opioid use following spine surgery: Protocol for a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial","authors":"Jolin B. Yamin , Bethany D. Pester , Ramya Kommu , Caroline Allen , Diya Dharmendran , Kylie Steinhilber , Madelyn Crago , Savannah Kazemipour , Angelina Franqueiro , Delia Fentazi , Kristin L. Schreiber , Robert R. Edwards , Robert N. Jamison , Samantha M. Meints","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107785","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107785","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Back pain is increasingly common, leading to more spine surgeries. While most people experience pain relief and improved function after surgery, many continue to suffer from chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) with limited functional improvement. CPSP is often treated with opioids, raising concerns about misuse, poor functional outcomes, and broader public health impacts. Therefore, perioperative interventions are needed to enhance outcomes and reduce the risk of opioid misuse after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This article outlines a study protocol evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a brief, perioperative Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention aimed at improving pain and reducing opioid use after spine surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In this pilot randomized controlled trial, participants scheduled for spine surgery (<em>anticipated N</em> = 100) are assigned to the ACT intervention or a treatment-as-usual group.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>The ACT intervention is a 5-h, single-session, virtual workshop with a booster call two weeks post-workshop or post-surgery, whichever is later.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome is patient-reported treatment helpfulness immediately after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported treatment credibility and expectancy post-intervention, treatment helpfulness at 1 month post-surgery, and pain interference, pain intensity and opioid use at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This pilot trial examines a novel, brief ACT intervention aimed at preventing CPSP and reducing opioid dependence. If successful, feasibility and preliminary efficacy results will be utilized to inform a future, full-scale randomized trial of this intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142885259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}