Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-04-17DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001527
Ha Jeong Lim, Lee Bom, Seung-Yul Lee, Jae Youn Moon, Sang-Hoon Kim, Jung-Hoon Sung, In Jai Kim, Sang-Wook Lim, Dong-Hun Cha, Se Hun Kang
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) outcomes are influenced by social determinants, including marital status. However, research on the sex-specific effects of marital status on CAD outcomes is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between marital status and clinical outcomes of patients with CAD stratified according to sex in Korea.
Methods: A total of 3476 patients with CAD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Patients were categorized into married and nonmarried groups based on demographic data at the time of admission. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
Results: Among the study population, 20.7% of women and 11.5% of men who underwent PCI for CAD were nonmarried. For 87.1% of nonmarried women, the cause of being nonmarried was the death of a spouse, whereas for 48.3% of unmarried men, the most common cause was being unmarried. During a median follow-up of 53.3 months, in analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, nonmarried status was associated with higher all-cause [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-4.09, P = 0.009] and cardiovascular (adjusted HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 19.91-5.80, P = 0.017) deaths in men but not in women.
Conclusion: Marital status independently predicted the adverse outcomes in men with CAD but not in women, highlighting the importance of sex-specific approaches to the assessment of social determinants in cardiovascular care. Future studies should explore broader social and economic factors to inform targeted interventions.
背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的预后受到包括婚姻状况在内的社会决定因素的影响。然而,关于婚姻状况对CAD结果的性别特异性影响的研究是有限的。本研究旨在评估韩国按性别分层的冠心病患者的婚姻状况与临床结果之间的关系。方法:对3476例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的冠心病患者进行回顾性观察性研究。根据入院时的人口统计数据,将患者分为已婚和未婚两组。主要终点是全因死亡率。结果:在研究人群中,20.7%的女性和11.5%的男性接受PCI治疗CAD是未婚的。对于87.1%的未婚妇女来说,不结婚的原因是配偶死亡,而对于48.3%的未婚男子来说,最常见的原因是未婚。在中位53.3个月的随访期间,在使用Cox比例风险回归模型进行分析时,未婚状态与男性较高的全因死亡(校正风险比(HR): 2.24, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.22-4.09, P = 0.009)和心血管(校正风险比:2.63,95% CI: 19.91-5.80, P = 0.017)相关,而与女性无关。结论:婚姻状况独立地预测了男性冠心病患者的不良结局,而不是女性,强调了评估心血管护理中社会决定因素的性别特异性方法的重要性。未来的研究应探索更广泛的社会和经济因素,为有针对性的干预提供信息。
{"title":"Sex differences in the impact of marital status on coronary artery disease outcomes in Korea.","authors":"Ha Jeong Lim, Lee Bom, Seung-Yul Lee, Jae Youn Moon, Sang-Hoon Kim, Jung-Hoon Sung, In Jai Kim, Sang-Wook Lim, Dong-Hun Cha, Se Hun Kang","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001527","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001527","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) outcomes are influenced by social determinants, including marital status. However, research on the sex-specific effects of marital status on CAD outcomes is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between marital status and clinical outcomes of patients with CAD stratified according to sex in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3476 patients with CAD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Patients were categorized into married and nonmarried groups based on demographic data at the time of admission. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the study population, 20.7% of women and 11.5% of men who underwent PCI for CAD were nonmarried. For 87.1% of nonmarried women, the cause of being nonmarried was the death of a spouse, whereas for 48.3% of unmarried men, the most common cause was being unmarried. During a median follow-up of 53.3 months, in analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, nonmarried status was associated with higher all-cause [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-4.09, P = 0.009] and cardiovascular (adjusted HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 19.91-5.80, P = 0.017) deaths in men but not in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Marital status independently predicted the adverse outcomes in men with CAD but not in women, highlighting the importance of sex-specific approaches to the assessment of social determinants in cardiovascular care. Future studies should explore broader social and economic factors to inform targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"554-560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462682/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143991723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-04-23DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001529
Seung Hun Lee, Yong-Kyu Lee, Joon Ho Ahn, Yongcheol Kim, Seongho Park, Donghyeon Joo, Kyung Hoo Cho, Min Chul Kim, Doo Sun Sim, Ju Han Kim, Youngkeun Ahn, Young Joon Hong
Background: Despite advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), stent-related complications continue to occur, emphasizing the necessity for stent optimization. This study employed optical coherence tomography (OCT) to investigate the safety and efficacy of overexpanding the biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (SYNERGY; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) stent in large coronary arteries.
Methods: This single-center observational study enrolled patients with ischemic heart disease requiring stent placement in large coronary arteries (≥4.5 mm). The patients underwent PCI guided by OCT using SYNERGY stents, incorporating postdilation techniques to enhance expansion. Stent parameters were evaluated through OCT imaging. The primary endpoints focused on the maximum stent diameter and the maximum percentage of overexpansion. Secondary clinical outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stent thrombosis, cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), and heart failure readmissions, were monitored with follow-ups at 1, 6, and 12 months, as well as annually thereafter.
Results: A total of 12 patients (8427 struts) were analyzed after successful PCI. OCT imaging showed adequate stent expansion, maximum stent diameter was 4.5 ± 0.2 mm, with a maximum expansion of 113.2 ± 4.1%), with no definite stent fractures or major edge dissections. During follow-up, one patient experienced an MI, but no stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, CVA, or death were reported.
Conclusion: Application of OCT-guided PCI with SYNERGY stents is safe and effective for treating large coronary arteries. It facilitates optimal stent expansion and yields favorable long-term outcomes. These results advocate for an expanded application of OCT-guided PCI in complex anatomical situations, showcasing the performance of SYNERGY stents in cases of excess expansion.
{"title":"Feasibility of biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stent overexpansion: the SYNOVER study.","authors":"Seung Hun Lee, Yong-Kyu Lee, Joon Ho Ahn, Yongcheol Kim, Seongho Park, Donghyeon Joo, Kyung Hoo Cho, Min Chul Kim, Doo Sun Sim, Ju Han Kim, Youngkeun Ahn, Young Joon Hong","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001529","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), stent-related complications continue to occur, emphasizing the necessity for stent optimization. This study employed optical coherence tomography (OCT) to investigate the safety and efficacy of overexpanding the biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (SYNERGY; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) stent in large coronary arteries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center observational study enrolled patients with ischemic heart disease requiring stent placement in large coronary arteries (≥4.5 mm). The patients underwent PCI guided by OCT using SYNERGY stents, incorporating postdilation techniques to enhance expansion. Stent parameters were evaluated through OCT imaging. The primary endpoints focused on the maximum stent diameter and the maximum percentage of overexpansion. Secondary clinical outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stent thrombosis, cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), and heart failure readmissions, were monitored with follow-ups at 1, 6, and 12 months, as well as annually thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 patients (8427 struts) were analyzed after successful PCI. OCT imaging showed adequate stent expansion, maximum stent diameter was 4.5 ± 0.2 mm, with a maximum expansion of 113.2 ± 4.1%), with no definite stent fractures or major edge dissections. During follow-up, one patient experienced an MI, but no stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, CVA, or death were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Application of OCT-guided PCI with SYNERGY stents is safe and effective for treating large coronary arteries. It facilitates optimal stent expansion and yields favorable long-term outcomes. These results advocate for an expanded application of OCT-guided PCI in complex anatomical situations, showcasing the performance of SYNERGY stents in cases of excess expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"604-609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143962689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a high thrombus burden remains an important clinical consideration. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of aspiration catheter size on thrombus removal and the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon.
Methods: This retrospective study included 208 STEMI patients presenting within 12 h of symptom onset with high thrombus burden. All underwent primary PCI with thrombus aspiration. Patients were divided based on catheter size: 7-French (n = 85) and 6-French (n = 123). Clinical characteristics, procedural outcomes, and angiographic results were compared. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of slow-flow/no-reflow.
Results: Patients treated with a 7-French catheter had a lower incidence of slow-flow/no-reflow after stent deployment (14.0 vs. 36.6%; P < 0.001) and postdilatation (25.0 vs. 55.2%; P = 0.003). Final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was more frequently achieved in the 7-French group (100 vs. 90.2%; P = 0.032). History of stroke or transient ischemic attack [odds ratio (OR): 5.16; P = 0.021] and ischemic time greater than 330 min (OR: 2.13; P = 0.032) were predictors of no-reflow, while use of a 7-French catheter was protective (OR: 0.26; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In STEMI patients with high thrombus burden, using a 7-French aspiration catheter was associated with higher procedural success and lower incidence of slow-flow/no-reflow. Larger-caliber catheters may offer a clinical advantage in selected patients undergoing primary PCI.
背景:st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者血栓负担高的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间血栓吸出仍然是一个重要的临床考虑因素。本研究旨在评估抽吸导管尺寸对血栓清除和慢流/无回流现象的影响。方法:本回顾性研究纳入208例在症状出现12小时内出现高血栓负担的STEMI患者。所有患者均行首次PCI伴血栓抽吸。根据导管尺寸对患者进行分组:7 french (n = 85)和6 french (n = 123)。比较临床特征、手术结果和血管造影结果。多变量逻辑回归确定了慢流/无回流的独立预测因子。结果:使用7-French导管治疗的患者在支架置放后(14.0比36.6%,P < 0.001)和扩张后(25.0比55.2%,P = 0.003)的慢流/无回流发生率较低。7-French组在心肌梗死3血流中实现最终溶栓的频率更高(100比90.2%;P = 0.032)。卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作史[优势比(or): 5.16;P = 0.021]和缺血时间大于330 min (OR: 2.13; P = 0.032)是无血流再流的预测因素,而使用7-French导管具有保护作用(OR: 0.26; P < 0.001)。结论:在高血栓负荷的STEMI患者中,使用7-French抽吸导管可提高手术成功率,降低慢流/无回流发生率。大口径导管可能会为接受首次PCI的患者提供临床优势。
{"title":"Impact of aspiration catheter size on thrombus removal and slow-flow/no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Phutharet Chaturonrutsamee, Panuwat Lertlaksameewilai, Numchai Numkiatsakul","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001580","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a high thrombus burden remains an important clinical consideration. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of aspiration catheter size on thrombus removal and the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 208 STEMI patients presenting within 12 h of symptom onset with high thrombus burden. All underwent primary PCI with thrombus aspiration. Patients were divided based on catheter size: 7-French (n = 85) and 6-French (n = 123). Clinical characteristics, procedural outcomes, and angiographic results were compared. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of slow-flow/no-reflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with a 7-French catheter had a lower incidence of slow-flow/no-reflow after stent deployment (14.0 vs. 36.6%; P < 0.001) and postdilatation (25.0 vs. 55.2%; P = 0.003). Final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was more frequently achieved in the 7-French group (100 vs. 90.2%; P = 0.032). History of stroke or transient ischemic attack [odds ratio (OR): 5.16; P = 0.021] and ischemic time greater than 330 min (OR: 2.13; P = 0.032) were predictors of no-reflow, while use of a 7-French catheter was protective (OR: 0.26; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In STEMI patients with high thrombus burden, using a 7-French aspiration catheter was associated with higher procedural success and lower incidence of slow-flow/no-reflow. Larger-caliber catheters may offer a clinical advantage in selected patients undergoing primary PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001585
Ryosuke Amisaki, Tomomi Watanabe, Masaru Kato
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in severely calcified lesions remains challenging. While orbital atherectomy is a treatment option for calcified lesions, the specific patient and lesion characteristics that predict successful debulking with orbital atherectomy remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with a greater minimum lumen area (MLA) after orbital atherectomy.
Methods: We retrospectively identified 77 lesions in 68 patients who underwent PCI with orbital atherectomy at Tottori University Hospital from May 2020 to June 2024. Among these, 62 lesions with a measurable intraluminal area by intravascular imaging were included in the analysis. The lesions were divided into two groups on the basis of a median post-orbital atherectomy MLA of 2.5 mm2: the large group (≥2.5 mm2) and the small group (<2.5 mm2). We compared the patients' background, characteristics of the lesions, procedural details, and imaging findings between the two groups.
Results: The large group more frequently had prior rotational atherectomy use (35.5 vs. 3.2%; P = 0.004) and had a greater pre-orbital atherectomy MLA [2.36 (2.01-3.10) vs. 1.37 mm2 (0.99-1.76); P < 0.001] than the small group. No significant differences in major complications or 1-year outcomes were observed between the two groups.
Conclusion: Optimal lumen gain following orbital atherectomy was associated with a greater pre-orbital atherectomy MLA and prior rotational atherectomy. Pretreatment with rotational atherectomy may establish a sufficient lumen, subsequently enhancing the efficacy of orbital atherectomy. These results suggest the effectiveness of a strategy of using rotational atherectomy before orbital atherectomy.
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在严重钙化病变中仍然具有挑战性。虽然眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术是钙化病变的一种治疗选择,但预测眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术成功减厚的具体患者和病变特征仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定眶动脉粥样硬化切除术后最大最小管腔面积(MLA)的相关因素。方法:我们回顾性分析了2020年5月至2024年6月在鸟取大学医院接受PCI合并眶动脉粥样硬化切除术的68例患者的77个病变。其中,通过血管内成像可测量腔内面积的62个病变被纳入分析。根据眶内动脉粥样硬化切除术后MLA的中位数为2.5 mm2,将病变分为两组:大组(≥2.5 mm2)和小组(结果:大组先前更频繁地使用旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(35.5 vs. 3.2%; P = 0.004),并且眶内动脉粥样硬化切除术前MLA更高[2.36 (2.01-3.10)vs. 1.37 mm2 (0.99-1.76);结论:眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术后的最佳管腔增益与眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术前MLA和先前的旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术相关。旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术的预处理可以建立足够的管腔,从而提高眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术的疗效。这些结果表明在眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术前采用旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术的策略是有效的。
{"title":"The efficacy of orbital atherectomy is associated with prior rotational atherectomy and a greater preprocedural lumen area.","authors":"Ryosuke Amisaki, Tomomi Watanabe, Masaru Kato","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in severely calcified lesions remains challenging. While orbital atherectomy is a treatment option for calcified lesions, the specific patient and lesion characteristics that predict successful debulking with orbital atherectomy remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with a greater minimum lumen area (MLA) after orbital atherectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 77 lesions in 68 patients who underwent PCI with orbital atherectomy at Tottori University Hospital from May 2020 to June 2024. Among these, 62 lesions with a measurable intraluminal area by intravascular imaging were included in the analysis. The lesions were divided into two groups on the basis of a median post-orbital atherectomy MLA of 2.5 mm2: the large group (≥2.5 mm2) and the small group (<2.5 mm2). We compared the patients' background, characteristics of the lesions, procedural details, and imaging findings between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The large group more frequently had prior rotational atherectomy use (35.5 vs. 3.2%; P = 0.004) and had a greater pre-orbital atherectomy MLA [2.36 (2.01-3.10) vs. 1.37 mm2 (0.99-1.76); P < 0.001] than the small group. No significant differences in major complications or 1-year outcomes were observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimal lumen gain following orbital atherectomy was associated with a greater pre-orbital atherectomy MLA and prior rotational atherectomy. Pretreatment with rotational atherectomy may establish a sufficient lumen, subsequently enhancing the efficacy of orbital atherectomy. These results suggest the effectiveness of a strategy of using rotational atherectomy before orbital atherectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001586
Shanza Malik, Zahra Quettawala Mufaddal, Lida Koskina, Omer Mustafa Siddiqui, Mohamad Mansour, Khushboo Nusrat, Rafay Khan, Muhammad Umer Sohail, Syed Husain Farhan, Deepinder Singh, Eman Ali, Ishaque Hameed
Background: Historically, the elderly population was underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating the optimal treatment for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Therefore, we aimed to compare invasive versus noninvasive strategies for the management of NSTEMI in older adults.
Methods: PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were screened for studies evaluating medical therapy or invasive revascularization in elderly patients with NSTEMI. Following outcomes were extracted: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, fatal or nonfatal MI, repeat coronary revascularization, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bleeding, stroke, noncardiovascular death, and repeat hospitalization for heart failure. Data were pooled using random-effects model to evaluate weighted mean differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024622236.
Results: Seven studies (n = 2997 patients) were included. Patients treated with medical versus invasive therapies showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ratio: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.94-1.18, P = 0.37); however, invasive therapies significantly decreased the risk of fatal or nonfatal MI (risk ratio: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59-0.96, P = 0.02), repeat coronary revascularizations (risk ratio: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P < 0.00001), and risk of MACE (risk ratio: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.89, P = 0.002). Lastly, invasive therapies were associated with increased risk of bleeding.
Conclusion: Invasive therapy, in comparison to medical management, has reduced incidence of fatal or nonfatal MI, MACE, and the need for revascularization; however, no benefit was noted for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Age-specific guidelines must be established for the management of NSTEMI among older adults.
背景:历史上,老年人群在评估非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)最佳治疗方法的临床试验中代表性不足。因此,我们的目的是比较有创与无创治疗老年人非stemi的策略。方法:PubMed、SCOPUS和Cochrane中央对照试验登记系统筛选评估老年非stemi患者药物治疗或有创性血运重建术的研究。提取以下结果:全因死亡率、心血管死亡、致死性或非致死性心肌梗死、重复冠状动脉血运重建术、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、出血、卒中、非心血管死亡和因心力衰竭重复住院。采用随机效应模型合并数据,以95%置信区间(ci)评估加权平均差异和风险比。本研究已注册为PROSPERO, CRD42024622236。结果:纳入7项研究(n = 2997例患者)。内科治疗与侵入性治疗患者的全因死亡率无显著差异(风险比:1.05,95% CI: 0.94-1.18, P = 0.37);然而,有创治疗显著降低了致死性或非致死性心肌梗死的风险(风险比:0.75,95% CI: 0.59-0.96, P = 0.02)、重复冠状动脉血运重建的风险(风险比:0.29,95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P)。结论:与医学治疗相比,有创治疗降低了致死性或非致死性心肌梗死、MACE的发生率和血运重建的需要;然而,在全因死亡率和心血管死亡率方面没有发现任何益处。必须建立针对老年人NSTEMI管理的年龄特异性指南。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of invasive versus noninvasive treatments in elderly patients with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shanza Malik, Zahra Quettawala Mufaddal, Lida Koskina, Omer Mustafa Siddiqui, Mohamad Mansour, Khushboo Nusrat, Rafay Khan, Muhammad Umer Sohail, Syed Husain Farhan, Deepinder Singh, Eman Ali, Ishaque Hameed","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001586","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, the elderly population was underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating the optimal treatment for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Therefore, we aimed to compare invasive versus noninvasive strategies for the management of NSTEMI in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were screened for studies evaluating medical therapy or invasive revascularization in elderly patients with NSTEMI. Following outcomes were extracted: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, fatal or nonfatal MI, repeat coronary revascularization, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bleeding, stroke, noncardiovascular death, and repeat hospitalization for heart failure. Data were pooled using random-effects model to evaluate weighted mean differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024622236.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies (n = 2997 patients) were included. Patients treated with medical versus invasive therapies showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ratio: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.94-1.18, P = 0.37); however, invasive therapies significantly decreased the risk of fatal or nonfatal MI (risk ratio: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59-0.96, P = 0.02), repeat coronary revascularizations (risk ratio: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.21-0.40, P < 0.00001), and risk of MACE (risk ratio: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.89, P = 0.002). Lastly, invasive therapies were associated with increased risk of bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Invasive therapy, in comparison to medical management, has reduced incidence of fatal or nonfatal MI, MACE, and the need for revascularization; however, no benefit was noted for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Age-specific guidelines must be established for the management of NSTEMI among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001584
Chidubem Ezenna, Sammudeen Ibrahim, Mahmoud Ismayl, Mrinal Murali Krishna, Kuan-Yu Chi, Meghna Joseph, Zafer Akman, Raiza Rossi, Armin Nouri, Mohammad Al Mouslmani, Abdulla Damluji, Andrew M Goldsweig, Michael G Nanna
Background: Older adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) face unique challenges due to complex anatomy and comorbidities. Intravascular imaging [including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)] has been shown to improve PCI outcomes, but its benefits in older adults are less well established. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare intravascular imaging with angiography alone to guide PCI in older adults.
Methods: Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for RCTs comparing intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT) vs. angiography alone in adults aged ≥65 years. The outcome of interest was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at the longest follow-up, as defined by each trial. Subgroup analyses were performed based on intravascular imaging modality, age group, and lesion complexity. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins' I² statistic.
Results: Nine RCTs (n = 7164, intravascular imaging = 3703, angiography alone = 3461) met the inclusion criteria. Intravascular imaging significantly reduced MACE compared with angiography alone [relative risk (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.77; P < 0.001; I² = 0%]. IVUS demonstrated superiority over angiography alone (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.72; P < 0.001; I² = 0%), while OCT demonstrated only a trend toward MACE reduction (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.02). Subgroup analyses indicated consistent benefits with intravascular imaging for adults aged ≥65 and ≥70 years, respectively, and among those with complex coronary lesions (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Intravascular imaging guidance, especially IVUS, reduces MACE in older adults undergoing PCI compared with angiography alone.
{"title":"Intravascular imaging vs. angiography alone to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Chidubem Ezenna, Sammudeen Ibrahim, Mahmoud Ismayl, Mrinal Murali Krishna, Kuan-Yu Chi, Meghna Joseph, Zafer Akman, Raiza Rossi, Armin Nouri, Mohammad Al Mouslmani, Abdulla Damluji, Andrew M Goldsweig, Michael G Nanna","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001584","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) face unique challenges due to complex anatomy and comorbidities. Intravascular imaging [including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)] has been shown to improve PCI outcomes, but its benefits in older adults are less well established. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare intravascular imaging with angiography alone to guide PCI in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for RCTs comparing intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT) vs. angiography alone in adults aged ≥65 years. The outcome of interest was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at the longest follow-up, as defined by each trial. Subgroup analyses were performed based on intravascular imaging modality, age group, and lesion complexity. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins' I² statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs (n = 7164, intravascular imaging = 3703, angiography alone = 3461) met the inclusion criteria. Intravascular imaging significantly reduced MACE compared with angiography alone [relative risk (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.77; P < 0.001; I² = 0%]. IVUS demonstrated superiority over angiography alone (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.72; P < 0.001; I² = 0%), while OCT demonstrated only a trend toward MACE reduction (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.02). Subgroup analyses indicated consistent benefits with intravascular imaging for adults aged ≥65 and ≥70 years, respectively, and among those with complex coronary lesions (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravascular imaging guidance, especially IVUS, reduces MACE in older adults undergoing PCI compared with angiography alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12797300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Timely restoration of blood flow is critical for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management. We evaluate the effects of time intervals - total ischemic time, time from symptom onset to first medical contact, delay within the healthcare system, and time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation - on in-hospital mortality among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Methods: We analyzed data from 315 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a hospital between 2020 and 2021. A random forest model was used to assess the predictive importance of time delay components for in-hospital mortality.
Results: Of the total sample, 35 patients died. The median (interquartile range) for total ischemic time was 310.0 (215.0-547.5) min. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in time to first medical contact [120.0 (60.0-245.0) vs. 210.0 (120.0-272.5); P = 0.007] and total ischemic time [300.0 (210.0-531.2) vs. 370.0 (320.0-720.0); P = 0.001]; however, the multivariable model (accuracy = 0.971, sensitivity = 0.800, specificity = 0.999, and an area under the curve = 0.93) identified total ischemic time as the most important time-based predictor of mortality, followed by system delay, time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation, from symptom onset to first medical contact, and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation.
Conclusion: Each delay component in STEMI management carries distinct clinical consequences that necessitate targeted intervention.
{"title":"The effects of delays at each stage of care on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Omid Rafizadeh, Saghar Erfani, Sobhan Zarbafti, Sahel Erfani","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely restoration of blood flow is critical for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management. We evaluate the effects of time intervals - total ischemic time, time from symptom onset to first medical contact, delay within the healthcare system, and time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation - on in-hospital mortality among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 315 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a hospital between 2020 and 2021. A random forest model was used to assess the predictive importance of time delay components for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total sample, 35 patients died. The median (interquartile range) for total ischemic time was 310.0 (215.0-547.5) min. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in time to first medical contact [120.0 (60.0-245.0) vs. 210.0 (120.0-272.5); P = 0.007] and total ischemic time [300.0 (210.0-531.2) vs. 370.0 (320.0-720.0); P = 0.001]; however, the multivariable model (accuracy = 0.971, sensitivity = 0.800, specificity = 0.999, and an area under the curve = 0.93) identified total ischemic time as the most important time-based predictor of mortality, followed by system delay, time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation, from symptom onset to first medical contact, and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Each delay component in STEMI management carries distinct clinical consequences that necessitate targeted intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-30DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001491
Ertugrul Cakir, Serdar Aslan
{"title":"Congenital absence of left circumflex artery and super dominant right coronary artery.","authors":"Ertugrul Cakir, Serdar Aslan","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001491","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":"36 6","pages":"e81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144774841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-30DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001519
Leizhi Ku, Zheng Liu, Xiaojing Ma
{"title":"Anomalous left coronary artery arising from the right sinus of Valsalva with an intramural course.","authors":"Leizhi Ku, Zheng Liu, Xiaojing Ma","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001519","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001519","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"e87-e88"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143662933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}