Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001591
Ya-Wen Lu, Kang-Ling Wang, Yu-Wei Wang, Ming-Cheng Liu, Yun-Chung Cheng, Wen-Hsien Chen, David E Newby, Michelle C Williams, Wen-Lieng Lee, Jung-Hsuan Chen
Background: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is an emerging technology that improves dose efficiency, image resolution, and noise performance. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the first-generation PCD-CT with a third-generation energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) for the detection of coronary artery disease in the participants from a health check programme in Taiwan.
Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included 205 asymptomatic individuals undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography as part of their health screening: 103 with EID-CT in July 2024 and 102 with PCD-CT in January 2025. All scans were acquired using the helical mode. Radiation exposure, iodinated contrast volume, and referral outcomes were compared between those scanned with PCD-CT and with EID-CT.
Results: Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the two groups except for height, smoking habit, and plasma lipid and glucose concentrations. The PCD-CT group had a lower radiation dose indexed by dose length product (401.0 vs. 633.6 mGy·cm and 421.5 vs. 690.0 mGy·cm for the main scan and for the total procedure, respectively; both P < 0.001) but received higher contrast volume (65.0 vs. 49.0 ml; P < 0.001), as compared with the EID-CT group. All images were of good diagnostic quality, and the rates of referral to invasive coronary angiography (3.9 vs. 4.9%) were similar between the two groups (P > 0.999).
Conclusions: The first-generation PCD-CT, compared with a third-generation EID-CT, offered a substantial reduction in radiation exposure without additional needs for invasive cardiac catheterisation. Further studies using contrast-optimisation technologies and dose-optimisation strategies are warranted to assess diagnostic quality.
背景:光子计数检测器计算机断层扫描(PCD-CT)是一项新兴技术,可提高剂量效率、图像分辨率和噪声性能。我们的目的是比较第一代PCD-CT与第三代能量积分检测器计算机断层扫描(EID-CT)在台湾健康检查项目参与者中检测冠状动脉疾病的安全性和有效性。方法:在这项回顾性的单中心研究中,我们纳入了205名无症状患者,他们接受了冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影作为健康筛查的一部分:103名患者于2024年7月接受了EID-CT检查,102名患者于2025年1月接受了PCD-CT检查。所有扫描均采用螺旋模式。比较了PCD-CT和EID-CT扫描患者的辐射暴露、碘化造影剂体积和转诊结果。结果:除了身高、吸烟习惯、血脂和血糖浓度外,两组的基线特征基本平衡。以剂量长度积为指标,PCD-CT组放射剂量较低(主扫描和全扫描分别为401.0 vs. 633.6 mGy·cm和421.5 vs. 690.0 mGy·cm, P均为0.999)。结论:与第三代EID-CT相比,第一代PCD-CT在不需要额外的有创心导管治疗的情况下,大大减少了辐射暴露。进一步研究使用对比优化技术和剂量优化策略评估诊断质量是必要的。
{"title":"Initial clinical evaluation of photon-counting detector computed tomography for coronary artery disease in Taiwan.","authors":"Ya-Wen Lu, Kang-Ling Wang, Yu-Wei Wang, Ming-Cheng Liu, Yun-Chung Cheng, Wen-Hsien Chen, David E Newby, Michelle C Williams, Wen-Lieng Lee, Jung-Hsuan Chen","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001591","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is an emerging technology that improves dose efficiency, image resolution, and noise performance. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the first-generation PCD-CT with a third-generation energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) for the detection of coronary artery disease in the participants from a health check programme in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included 205 asymptomatic individuals undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography as part of their health screening: 103 with EID-CT in July 2024 and 102 with PCD-CT in January 2025. All scans were acquired using the helical mode. Radiation exposure, iodinated contrast volume, and referral outcomes were compared between those scanned with PCD-CT and with EID-CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the two groups except for height, smoking habit, and plasma lipid and glucose concentrations. The PCD-CT group had a lower radiation dose indexed by dose length product (401.0 vs. 633.6 mGy·cm and 421.5 vs. 690.0 mGy·cm for the main scan and for the total procedure, respectively; both P < 0.001) but received higher contrast volume (65.0 vs. 49.0 ml; P < 0.001), as compared with the EID-CT group. All images were of good diagnostic quality, and the rates of referral to invasive coronary angiography (3.9 vs. 4.9%) were similar between the two groups (P > 0.999).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The first-generation PCD-CT, compared with a third-generation EID-CT, offered a substantial reduction in radiation exposure without additional needs for invasive cardiac catheterisation. Further studies using contrast-optimisation technologies and dose-optimisation strategies are warranted to assess diagnostic quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145958773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To evaluate the agreement and comparative performance of non-ECG-gated computed tomography (CT) for coronary artery calcification (CAC) quantification compared with ECG-gated CT and to assess measurement variability between Agatston and volume scoring methods.
Methods: In this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, 130 patients undergoing pretranscatheter aortic valve implantation received both ECG-gated cardiac CT (3-mm slice) and non-ECG-gated chest CT (5-mm slice) in the same session. Agatston and volume scores were calculated for total CAC and individual vessels. Analyses included receiver operating characteristic curves, Pearson correlation, Fisher's z-transformation, Bland-Altman plots, and Deming regression.
Results: Both methods showed excellent agreement for detecting high-risk CAC [Agatston: area under the curve (AUC), 0.994; volume: AUC, 0.996; P = 0.24]. Correlation between ECG-gated and non-ECG-gated CT was very strong (Agatston: r = 0.978; volume: r = 0.981), with volume scoring significantly outperforming Agatston in the left anterior descending artery (z = -2.02, P = 0.044). Bland-Altman analysis revealed greater bias and wider limits of agreement for Agatston scores. Deming regression showed Agatston scores were consistently underestimated (slope = 0.61), whereas volume scores had slopes closer to unity (1.07), reflecting stronger agreement.
Conclusion: Calcium quantification on non-ECG-gated CT demonstrated strong agreement with ECG-gated reference values. Volume scoring showed superior reproducibility and reduced susceptibility to variability inherent in non-ECG-gated imaging.
目的:评价非心电图门控计算机断层扫描(CT)与心电图门控CT在冠状动脉钙化(CAC)量化方面的一致性和比较性能,并评估Agatston和容积评分方法之间的测量差异。方法:在本回顾性诊断准确性研究中,130例经导管前主动脉瓣植入术患者同时接受心电图门控心脏CT(3毫米切片)和非心电图门控胸部CT(5毫米切片)检查。计算总CAC和单个血管的Agatston评分和容积评分。分析包括受试者工作特征曲线、Pearson相关、Fisher’s z变换、Bland-Altman图和Deming回归。结果:两种方法检测高危CAC的一致性较好[Agatston:曲线下面积(AUC), 0.994;体积:AUC, 0.996;p = 0.24]。心电图门控与非心电图门控CT相关性非常强(Agatston: r = 0.978;容积:r = 0.981),容积评分在左前降支上明显优于Agatston (z = -2.02, P = 0.044)。Bland-Altman分析显示Agatston分数的偏差更大,一致性范围更广。Deming回归显示Agatston分数一直被低估(斜率= 0.61),而volume分数的斜率更接近统一(1.07),反映出更强的一致性。结论:非心电图门控CT的钙定量与心电图门控参考值高度一致。体积评分显示出较好的再现性,降低了对非心电图门控成像固有变异性的敏感性。
{"title":"Diagnostic agreement of non-ECG-gated chest computed tomography for coronary artery calcium scoring: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography using Agatston and volume methods.","authors":"Kotaro Ouchi, Toru Sakuma, Shota Tachioka, Hiroya Ojiri","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the agreement and comparative performance of non-ECG-gated computed tomography (CT) for coronary artery calcification (CAC) quantification compared with ECG-gated CT and to assess measurement variability between Agatston and volume scoring methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, 130 patients undergoing pretranscatheter aortic valve implantation received both ECG-gated cardiac CT (3-mm slice) and non-ECG-gated chest CT (5-mm slice) in the same session. Agatston and volume scores were calculated for total CAC and individual vessels. Analyses included receiver operating characteristic curves, Pearson correlation, Fisher's z-transformation, Bland-Altman plots, and Deming regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods showed excellent agreement for detecting high-risk CAC [Agatston: area under the curve (AUC), 0.994; volume: AUC, 0.996; P = 0.24]. Correlation between ECG-gated and non-ECG-gated CT was very strong (Agatston: r = 0.978; volume: r = 0.981), with volume scoring significantly outperforming Agatston in the left anterior descending artery (z = -2.02, P = 0.044). Bland-Altman analysis revealed greater bias and wider limits of agreement for Agatston scores. Deming regression showed Agatston scores were consistently underestimated (slope = 0.61), whereas volume scores had slopes closer to unity (1.07), reflecting stronger agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calcium quantification on non-ECG-gated CT demonstrated strong agreement with ECG-gated reference values. Volume scoring showed superior reproducibility and reduced susceptibility to variability inherent in non-ECG-gated imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145533803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001588
Li-Nien Chien, Yan-Jun Chen, Ya-Hui Chang, Chao-Feng Lin
Objective: Features of high bleeding risk (HBR) determined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) are linked to an enhanced risk of bleeding events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This population-based study investigated whether patients with ARC-HBR are at an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation by analyzing a large-scale national healthcare database.
Methods: A total of 124 891 patients undergoing DES implantation between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2019 were identified and divided into two groups: the ARC-HBR group and the non-ARC-HBR group. The incidence rates of HHF of patients were observed. The risk of HHF following DES implantation associated with ARC-HBR features was analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: The incidence rates (per 1000 person-year) of HHF were 86.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 84.3-89.6] for ARC-HBR patients and 28.8 (95% CI: 28.3-29.3) for non-ARC-HBR patients during a mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 2.9 years. After adjustment for clinical variables, ARC-HBR patients exhibited an increased risk of HHF [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08-1.19, P < 0.001], particularly among patients without a prior history of HHF (aHR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.24-1.39, P < 0.001). These results remained consistent for patients who adhered to greater than or equal to 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy.
Conclusion: ARC-HBR patients exhibited a higher risk of HHF following DES implantation than non-ARC-HBR patients. These results highlight that the ARC-HBR feature is of clinical importance in identifying individuals at a heightened risk of developing HHF following DES implantation.
{"title":"Deciphering the incidence of heart failure following drug-eluting stent use in patients with high bleeding risk: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Li-Nien Chien, Yan-Jun Chen, Ya-Hui Chang, Chao-Feng Lin","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001588","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001588","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Features of high bleeding risk (HBR) determined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) are linked to an enhanced risk of bleeding events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This population-based study investigated whether patients with ARC-HBR are at an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation by analyzing a large-scale national healthcare database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 124 891 patients undergoing DES implantation between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2019 were identified and divided into two groups: the ARC-HBR group and the non-ARC-HBR group. The incidence rates of HHF of patients were observed. The risk of HHF following DES implantation associated with ARC-HBR features was analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates (per 1000 person-year) of HHF were 86.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 84.3-89.6] for ARC-HBR patients and 28.8 (95% CI: 28.3-29.3) for non-ARC-HBR patients during a mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 2.9 years. After adjustment for clinical variables, ARC-HBR patients exhibited an increased risk of HHF [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08-1.19, P < 0.001], particularly among patients without a prior history of HHF (aHR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.24-1.39, P < 0.001). These results remained consistent for patients who adhered to greater than or equal to 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ARC-HBR patients exhibited a higher risk of HHF following DES implantation than non-ARC-HBR patients. These results highlight that the ARC-HBR feature is of clinical importance in identifying individuals at a heightened risk of developing HHF following DES implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145480660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001589
Hesham Sheashaa, Kamal Awad, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Juan M Farina, Milagros Pereyra Pietri, Isabel G Scalia, Nima Baba Ali, Nadera N Bismee, Sogol Attaripour Esfahani, Omar Ibrahim, Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah, Ahmed K Mahmoud, Mahmoud Abdelnabi, Ramzi Ibrahim, Steven Lester, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani
Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) are established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, but their combined impact on mortality and sex differences remains unclear.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 97 396 patients with measured Lp(a) and HDL-C. Groups were stratified by Lp(a) (≥50 vs. <50 mg/dl) and HDL-C [low (<40), optimal (40-60), high (>60 mg/dl)]. Mortality was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox models.
Results: Over a median of 5.9 years, 7794 deaths occurred. Compared to optimal HDL-C/low Lp(a) (reference), high HDL-C/low Lp(a) had the lowest mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.91], while low HDL-C/high Lp(a) had the highest risk (aHR: 1.55; 1.41-1.71). High HDL-C protective effect was insignificant with elevated Lp(a) (aHR: 0.98; 0.89-1.08). Sex-stratified analyses revealed divergent effects: women with high HDL-C/high Lp(a) retained the HDL-C protective effect (aHR: 0.82; 0.72-0.93), whereas men faced increased risk (aHR: 1.22; 1.05-1.42).
Conclusion: Elevated Lp(a) enhances mortality risk despite elevated HDL-C levels, with sex-specific differences: women retain mortality benefits from high HDL-C despite elevated Lp(a), whereas men with concurrent elevations in HDL-C and Lp(a) experienced mortality risks comparable to those with low HDL-C. Findings underscore sex-specific CV risk stratification incorporating HDL-C and Lp(a), challenging the HDL-C universal protective role.
{"title":"High lipoprotein(a) attenuates the mortality benefit of elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with sex-specific variation: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hesham Sheashaa, Kamal Awad, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Juan M Farina, Milagros Pereyra Pietri, Isabel G Scalia, Nima Baba Ali, Nadera N Bismee, Sogol Attaripour Esfahani, Omar Ibrahim, Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah, Ahmed K Mahmoud, Mahmoud Abdelnabi, Ramzi Ibrahim, Steven Lester, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) are established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, but their combined impact on mortality and sex differences remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 97 396 patients with measured Lp(a) and HDL-C. Groups were stratified by Lp(a) (≥50 vs. <50 mg/dl) and HDL-C [low (<40), optimal (40-60), high (>60 mg/dl)]. Mortality was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median of 5.9 years, 7794 deaths occurred. Compared to optimal HDL-C/low Lp(a) (reference), high HDL-C/low Lp(a) had the lowest mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.91], while low HDL-C/high Lp(a) had the highest risk (aHR: 1.55; 1.41-1.71). High HDL-C protective effect was insignificant with elevated Lp(a) (aHR: 0.98; 0.89-1.08). Sex-stratified analyses revealed divergent effects: women with high HDL-C/high Lp(a) retained the HDL-C protective effect (aHR: 0.82; 0.72-0.93), whereas men faced increased risk (aHR: 1.22; 1.05-1.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated Lp(a) enhances mortality risk despite elevated HDL-C levels, with sex-specific differences: women retain mortality benefits from high HDL-C despite elevated Lp(a), whereas men with concurrent elevations in HDL-C and Lp(a) experienced mortality risks comparable to those with low HDL-C. Findings underscore sex-specific CV risk stratification incorporating HDL-C and Lp(a), challenging the HDL-C universal protective role.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145443983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001583
Nathaniel R Smilowitz, Barbara Jerome, David W Rhee, Robert Donnino, Jill E Jacobs, Anaïs Hausvater, Amanda Joa, Claudia Serrano-Gomez, Lindsay Elbaum, Ayman Farid, Judith S Hochman, Jeffrey S Berger, Harmony R Reynolds
Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is present in approximately 40% of patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and has been associated with inflammation. We investigated associations between measures of inflammation of the coronary perivascular adipose tissue assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and results of invasive coronary function testing (CFT) to diagnose CMD.
Methods: Adults referred for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography who had less than 50% stenosis in all epicardial arteries were prospectively enrolled. CMD was defined as a coronary flow reserve (CFR) less than 2.5 or index of microvascular resistance (IMR) greater than or equal to 25 using bolus thermodilution in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Coronary perivascular fat attenuation index was assessed by CCTA in the right coronary artery (RCA) and LAD. T tests were used to evaluate differences in perivascular FAI by CMD status.
Results: A total of 31 participants underwent CFT and CCTA. The mean age was 58 ± 11.7 years, 77% were female, and 61% were white. CMD was present in 15 participants (48%). No differences in perivascular FAI were observed in patients with and without CMD, either in the RCA [-74.2 ± 9.8 vs. -69.9 ± 10.3 Hounsfield units (HU), P = 0.24] or LAD (-76.4 ± 10.2 vs. -74.8 ± 12.7 HU, P = 0.69). Perivascular FAI was not correlated with CFR or IMR measurements in the RCA or LAD.
Conclusion: There were no associations between CMD diagnosed by invasive CFT and perivascular FAI by CCTA in patients with INOCA. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between vascular inflammation and CMD in INOCA.
背景:大约40%的缺血无阻塞性冠状动脉(INOCA)患者存在冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD),并与炎症有关。我们研究了冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)评估的冠状动脉血管周围脂肪组织炎症水平与诊断CMD的有创冠状动脉功能测试(CFT)结果之间的关系。方法:前瞻性纳入所有心外膜动脉狭窄小于50%的成人,接受临床指示的有创冠状动脉造影。CMD定义为冠脉血流储备(CFR)小于2.5或微血管阻力指数(IMR)大于或等于25,使用左前降支(LAD)热稀释。采用右冠状动脉(RCA)和LAD CCTA评估冠状动脉血管周围脂肪衰减指数。采用T检验评价CMD状态对血管周围FAI的影响。结果:31例患者接受了CFT和CCTA治疗。平均年龄58±11.7岁,女性占77%,白人占61%。15名参与者(48%)出现CMD。无论是RCA(-74.2±9.8比-69.9±10.3 Hounsfield单位(HU), P = 0.24)还是LAD(-76.4±10.2比-74.8±12.7 HU, P = 0.69),有CMD和无CMD患者的血管周围FAI均无差异。血管周围FAI与RCA或LAD的CFR或IMR测量无关。结论:有创CFT诊断的CMD与CCTA血管周围FAI无相关性。在INOCA中,血管炎症与CMD之间的关系有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Coronary perivascular adipose tissue fat attenuation index in patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries and coronary microvascular dysfunction.","authors":"Nathaniel R Smilowitz, Barbara Jerome, David W Rhee, Robert Donnino, Jill E Jacobs, Anaïs Hausvater, Amanda Joa, Claudia Serrano-Gomez, Lindsay Elbaum, Ayman Farid, Judith S Hochman, Jeffrey S Berger, Harmony R Reynolds","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001583","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is present in approximately 40% of patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and has been associated with inflammation. We investigated associations between measures of inflammation of the coronary perivascular adipose tissue assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and results of invasive coronary function testing (CFT) to diagnose CMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults referred for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography who had less than 50% stenosis in all epicardial arteries were prospectively enrolled. CMD was defined as a coronary flow reserve (CFR) less than 2.5 or index of microvascular resistance (IMR) greater than or equal to 25 using bolus thermodilution in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Coronary perivascular fat attenuation index was assessed by CCTA in the right coronary artery (RCA) and LAD. T tests were used to evaluate differences in perivascular FAI by CMD status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 participants underwent CFT and CCTA. The mean age was 58 ± 11.7 years, 77% were female, and 61% were white. CMD was present in 15 participants (48%). No differences in perivascular FAI were observed in patients with and without CMD, either in the RCA [-74.2 ± 9.8 vs. -69.9 ± 10.3 Hounsfield units (HU), P = 0.24] or LAD (-76.4 ± 10.2 vs. -74.8 ± 12.7 HU, P = 0.69). Perivascular FAI was not correlated with CFR or IMR measurements in the RCA or LAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no associations between CMD diagnosed by invasive CFT and perivascular FAI by CCTA in patients with INOCA. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between vascular inflammation and CMD in INOCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-24DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001528
Yanbing Jiang, Li Xie, Lorenzo Azzalinilini, Xiaohui Zhao
{"title":"Optical coherence tomography assessment of retrograde wire in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Yanbing Jiang, Li Xie, Lorenzo Azzalinilini, Xiaohui Zhao","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001528","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001528","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"622-623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143981515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) combined with drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the treatment of complex coronary artery lesions.
Methods: In total, 305 patients with complex coronary artery lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were retrospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into the DES combined with the DCB treatment group (hybrid group) and the DES-only treatment group (DES group), and the target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between the two groups during 2-year follow-up.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline clinical characteristics ( P > 0.05). In the treated lesions of reference vessel diameters (RVD) ≥3 mm, there were no significant differences in coronary angiography and interventional characteristics between the two groups. In the treated lesion of RVD <3mm, the hybrid group had a higher proportion of lesion preparation ( P <0.001) and a higher rate of residual stenosis ( P <0.001) than the DES group. During the 2-year follow-up, the clinical outcomes between the two groups showed no significant differences. After propensity score matching, there were still no significant differences between the two groups in the cumulative survival rates without TLR (95.8% vs. 94.2%; log-rank P = 0.560) or MACE (89.4% vs. 87.8%; log-rank P = 0.578) at 2-year follow-up.
Conclusion: During the 2-year follow-up, DES combined with DCB treatment showed similar efficacy and safety compared with DES-only treatment in complex coronary artery lesions.
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stent combined with drug-coated balloon in the treatment of complex coronary artery lesions.","authors":"Xiaotao Li, Yuhong Yang, Ran Zhang, Dawei Yang, Xiaojie Chen, Jia Wang, Chenhao Zhang","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001543","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) combined with drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the treatment of complex coronary artery lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 305 patients with complex coronary artery lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were retrospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into the DES combined with the DCB treatment group (hybrid group) and the DES-only treatment group (DES group), and the target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between the two groups during 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline clinical characteristics ( P > 0.05). In the treated lesions of reference vessel diameters (RVD) ≥3 mm, there were no significant differences in coronary angiography and interventional characteristics between the two groups. In the treated lesion of RVD <3mm, the hybrid group had a higher proportion of lesion preparation ( P <0.001) and a higher rate of residual stenosis ( P <0.001) than the DES group. During the 2-year follow-up, the clinical outcomes between the two groups showed no significant differences. After propensity score matching, there were still no significant differences between the two groups in the cumulative survival rates without TLR (95.8% vs. 94.2%; log-rank P = 0.560) or MACE (89.4% vs. 87.8%; log-rank P = 0.578) at 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the 2-year follow-up, DES combined with DCB treatment showed similar efficacy and safety compared with DES-only treatment in complex coronary artery lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"587-594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144316058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-24DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001540
Muhammad Saad, Ifrah Ansari, Muhammad Umer Sohail, Syed Ibad Ahsan, Saad Ahmed Waqas, Muhammad Sameer Arshad
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are significant cardiovascular conditions with substantial health and economic burdens. Despite advancements in treatment, long-term mortality trends among individuals with both conditions remain underexplored. This study investigates age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) from 1999 to 2020 and examines trends to address these gaps and highlight demographic and geographic disparities.
Methods: Mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database were analyzed for cases where CAD (ICD-10 codes I20-I25) and AF (ICD-10 code I48) were either contributing or underlying causes of death. Individuals aged 25 years and older were included in the analysis. AAMRs were calculated using direct standardization to the 2000 USA population, and trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression analysis. Mortality trends were stratified by sex, race, geography, and urbanization to identify disparities.
Results: Between 1999 and 2020, AAMRs for CAD- and AF-related mortality increased from 14.4 to 23.4 per 100 000, with an average annual percent change of +2.2% (95% confidence interval: 2.0-2.4). Men consistently exhibited higher overall AAMRs than women (22.9 vs. 13.1 ). Non-Hispanic (NH) White individuals had the highest AAMR (18.6), followed by NH American Indians (12.3), NH Blacks (10.0), Hispanics (9.4), and NH Asians (8.0). Rural areas experienced significantly higher AAMRs than urban areas (19.2 vs. 16.6). AAMRs were disproportionately higher in Western (17.7) and Midwestern USA regions (17.7). States in the top 90 th percentile reported nearly double the AAMRs compared to those in the bottom 10 th percentile.
Conclusion: Mortality rates associated with coexisting CAD and AF have significantly increased, with the most pronounced rise occurring after 2018. The findings reveal substantial disparities across sex, race, and geography. Targeted interventions are essential to address these inequalities, improve health outcomes, and reduce the growing burden of CAD and AF-related mortality.
{"title":"Rising burden of coronary artery disease-related mortality among USA adults with atrial fibrillation from 1999 to 2020.","authors":"Muhammad Saad, Ifrah Ansari, Muhammad Umer Sohail, Syed Ibad Ahsan, Saad Ahmed Waqas, Muhammad Sameer Arshad","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001540","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are significant cardiovascular conditions with substantial health and economic burdens. Despite advancements in treatment, long-term mortality trends among individuals with both conditions remain underexplored. This study investigates age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) from 1999 to 2020 and examines trends to address these gaps and highlight demographic and geographic disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database were analyzed for cases where CAD (ICD-10 codes I20-I25) and AF (ICD-10 code I48) were either contributing or underlying causes of death. Individuals aged 25 years and older were included in the analysis. AAMRs were calculated using direct standardization to the 2000 USA population, and trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression analysis. Mortality trends were stratified by sex, race, geography, and urbanization to identify disparities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1999 and 2020, AAMRs for CAD- and AF-related mortality increased from 14.4 to 23.4 per 100 000, with an average annual percent change of +2.2% (95% confidence interval: 2.0-2.4). Men consistently exhibited higher overall AAMRs than women (22.9 vs. 13.1 ). Non-Hispanic (NH) White individuals had the highest AAMR (18.6), followed by NH American Indians (12.3), NH Blacks (10.0), Hispanics (9.4), and NH Asians (8.0). Rural areas experienced significantly higher AAMRs than urban areas (19.2 vs. 16.6). AAMRs were disproportionately higher in Western (17.7) and Midwestern USA regions (17.7). States in the top 90 th percentile reported nearly double the AAMRs compared to those in the bottom 10 th percentile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality rates associated with coexisting CAD and AF have significantly increased, with the most pronounced rise occurring after 2018. The findings reveal substantial disparities across sex, race, and geography. Targeted interventions are essential to address these inequalities, improve health outcomes, and reduce the growing burden of CAD and AF-related mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"595-603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144246862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-24DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001533
Aiza Ahsan, Hafsah Mehmood, Zainab Ali Siddiqui, Raveen Mujeeb
{"title":"The dual burden of iron and vitamin D deficiencies in the growing epidemic of coronary heart disease across Asia: a call to action.","authors":"Aiza Ahsan, Hafsah Mehmood, Zainab Ali Siddiqui, Raveen Mujeeb","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001533","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":"36 7","pages":"633-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}