Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee537
Stanley L. Paulson
{"title":"Kelsen, Hans","authors":"Stanley L. Paulson","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee537","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee537","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":107237,"journal":{"name":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122930071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee888
Hans-Jöerg Ehni, S. Venkatapuram
{"title":"Geroethics","authors":"Hans-Jöerg Ehni, S. Venkatapuram","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee888","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":107237,"journal":{"name":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129352246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1002/9781444367072.WBIEE526
S. Hansson
Morality is concerned with evaluating and recommending. Therefore, among the key terms of moral discourse we find evaluating words like “good,” “bad, ” and “better, ” and we also find words expressing norms or recommendations, such as “ought, ” “forbidden, ” and “permitted. ” This essay is concerned with the evaluative terms. (On the normative terms, see Deontic Logic.) Keywords: logic and language; metaethics; rationality; value
{"title":"Good and Better","authors":"S. Hansson","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.WBIEE526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.WBIEE526","url":null,"abstract":"Morality is concerned with evaluating and recommending. Therefore, among the key terms of moral discourse we find evaluating words like “good,” “bad, ” and “better, ” and we also find words expressing norms or recommendations, such as “ought, ” “forbidden, ” and “permitted. ” This essay is concerned with the evaluative terms. (On the normative terms, see Deontic Logic.) \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Keywords: \u0000 \u0000logic and language; \u0000metaethics; \u0000rationality; \u0000value","PeriodicalId":107237,"journal":{"name":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","volume":"67 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120917039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee926
L. Blum
{"title":"Stereotyping and Stereotypes","authors":"L. Blum","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee926","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":107237,"journal":{"name":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124181603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-29DOI: 10.1093/0195155262.003.0004
G. Yaffe, J. Ral, G. Yaffe
A B ST R ACT. The intuitive idea that failed attempts to complete crimes are often themselves crimes belies the complexity and confusion surrounding the adjudication of criminal attempts. This Article offers an account of the grounds for the criminalization of attempt that provides the courts with sorely needed substantive guidance about precisely which kinds of behavior constitute a criminal attempt. The Article focuses on three well-known problems in the adjudication of attempt that have been particularly baffling both to courts and to commentators: specifying the line between solicitation and attempt; determining the conditions under which an "impossible" attempt is still criminal; and identifying the relevance of abandonment to responsibility for and sentencing of attempts. The Article proposes specific doctrinal recommendations for adjudicating all three kinds of attempts; these recommendations are implied by the conceptual framework developed here for thinking about attempt.
{"title":"Criminal Attempts","authors":"G. Yaffe, J. Ral, G. Yaffe","doi":"10.1093/0195155262.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/0195155262.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"A B ST R ACT. The intuitive idea that failed attempts to complete crimes are often themselves crimes belies the complexity and confusion surrounding the adjudication of criminal attempts. This Article offers an account of the grounds for the criminalization of attempt that provides the courts with sorely needed substantive guidance about precisely which kinds of behavior constitute a criminal attempt. The Article focuses on three well-known problems in the adjudication of attempt that have been particularly baffling both to courts and to commentators: specifying the line between solicitation and attempt; determining the conditions under which an \"impossible\" attempt is still criminal; and identifying the relevance of abandonment to responsibility for and sentencing of attempts. The Article proposes specific doctrinal recommendations for adjudicating all three kinds of attempts; these recommendations are implied by the conceptual framework developed here for thinking about attempt.","PeriodicalId":107237,"journal":{"name":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125524480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-29DOI: 10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee221.pub2
R. Dillon
{"title":"Self-Respect and Self-Esteem","authors":"R. Dillon","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee221.pub2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee221.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":107237,"journal":{"name":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125570140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：