Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences最新文献

Monitoring individuals' laboratory data is essential for assessing their health status, evaluating the effectiveness of treatments, predicting disease prognosis and detecting subclinical conditions. Currently, monitoring is performed intermittently, measuring serum, plasma, whole blood, urine and occasionally other body fluids at predefined time intervals. The ideal monitoring approach entails continuous measurement of concentration and activity of biomolecules in all body fluids, including solid tissues. This can be achieved through the use of biosensors strategically placed at various locations on the human body where measurements are required for monitoring. High-tech wearable biosensors provide an ideal, noninvasive, and esthetically pleasing solution for monitoring individuals' laboratory data. However, despite significant advances in wearable biosensor technology, the measurement capacities and the number of different analytes that are continuously monitored in patients are not yet at the desired level. In this review, we conducted a literature search and examined: (i) an overview of the background of monitoring for personalized laboratory medicine, (ii) the body fluids and analytes used for monitoring individuals, (iii) the different types of biosensors and methods used for measuring the concentration and activity of biomolecules, and (iv) the statistical algorithms used for personalized data analysis and interpretation in monitoring and evaluation.

Poor analytical quality may be the bane of medical use of laboratory tests, and the fight against excessive analytical variability presents a daily struggle. Laboratories should prioritize the perspectives and needs of their customers (the patients and healthcare personnel). Among them, comparability of results from the same patient sample when measured by different laboratories using different in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices is a logical priority to avoid result misinterpretation and potential patient harm. Harmonization (standardization) of laboratory measurements can be achieved by establishing metrological traceability of the results on clinical samples to stated higher-order references and providing an estimate of the uncertainty of measurement (MU). This estimate should be based on an MU budget including all known MU contributions generated by the employed calibration hierarchy, which in turn should be validated against fit-for-purpose maximum allowable MU derived according to internationally recommended models. In this report, we review the available strategies for establishing, evaluating, and monitoring analytical quality, drawing on three decades experience in the field. We discuss the most important aspects that may influence obtaining and maintaining analytical standardization in laboratory medicine, and offer practical solutions aimed at educating all stakeholders for the achievement of harmonized laboratory results. To fully implement the recommended approaches, all involved parties-i.e. reference providers, IVD manufacturers, medical laboratories, and External Quality Assessment organizers-must agree on their importance and enhance their specific knowledge.

The journey of translating a molecular discovery into the clinic involves multiple steps and requires planning, time, effort, and money. In this review, we provide a quick guide on the technical and clinical validation parameters that are necessary for successful commercialization of molecular and other markers. We also briefly address the different options for regulatory approvals. Successful clinical implantation depends on rigorous technical and clinical validation, and the ability to develop clear guidelines for the indications for testing (i.e. which patients are eligible to have this test), the frequency of testing, and also a clear interpretation of test results. Successful implementation requires providing evidence that the results of this test can be used to improve patient care. There are currently multiple routes for implementation of clinical molecular tests, which include regulatory agency- approved companion diagnostics, laboratory developed tests, or direct-to-consumer testing. Regulatory approval is considered the gold-standard, but it requires time and resources. There is an ongoing debate about the need for regulatory approval of laboratory developed testing. Ongoing oversight is maintained through lab accreditation and proficiency testing programs, which provide a common approach to ensuring high standards and consistent performance in clinical molecular labs. Before moving into the clinic, confirmation of both the clinical and analytic validity of a new molecular test is essential.

The study of metabolomics is revealing immense potential for diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and understanding of pathogenesis processes. Volatilomics is a subcategory of metabolomics interested in the detection of molecules that are small enough to be released in the gas phase. Volatile compounds produced by cellular processes are released into the blood and lymph, and can reach the external environment through different pathways, such as the blood-air interface in the lung that are detected in breath, or the blood-water interface in the kidney that leads to volatile compounds detected in urine. Besides breath and urine, additional sources of volatile compounds such as saliva, blood, feces, and skin are available. Volatilomics traces its roots back over fifty years to the pioneering investigations in the 1970s. Despite extensive research, the field remains in its infancy, hindered by a lack of standardization despite ample experimental evidence. The proliferation of analytical instrumentations, sample preparations and methods of volatilome sampling still make it difficult to compare results from different studies and to establish a common standard approach to volatilomics. This review aims to provide an overview of volatilomics' diagnostic potential, focusing on two key technical aspects: sampling and analysis. Sampling poses a challenge due to the susceptibility of human samples to contamination and confounding factors from various sources like the environment and lifestyle. The discussion then delves into targeted and untargeted approaches in volatilomics. Some case studies are presented to exemplify the results obtained so far. Finally, the review concludes with a discussion on the necessary steps to fully integrate volatilomics into clinical practice.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) testing are commonly used to determine infection status. Typically, the detection of IgM indicates an acute or recent infection, while the presence of IgG alone suggests a chronic or past infection. However, relying solely on IgG and IgM antibody positivity may not be sufficient to differentiate acute from chronic infections. This limitation arises from several factors. The prolonged presence of IgM can complicate diagnostic interpretations, and false positive IgM results often arise from antibody cross-reactivity with various antigens. Additionally, IgM may remain undetectable in prematurely collected samples or in individuals who are immunocompromised, further complicating accurate diagnosis. As a result, additional diagnostic tools are required to confirm infection status. Avidity is a measure of the strength of the binding between an antigen and antibody. Avidity-based assays have been developed for various infectious agents, including toxoplasma, cytomegalovirus (CMV), SARS-CoV-2, and avian influenza, and are promising tools in clinical diagnostics. By measuring the strength of antibody binding, they offer critical insights into the maturity of the immune response. These assays are instrumental in distinguishing between acute and chronic or past infections, monitoring disease progression, and guiding treatment decisions. The development of automated platforms has optimized the testing process by enhancing efficiency and minimizing the risk of manual errors. Additionally, the recent advent of real-time biosensor immunoassays, including the label-free immunoassays (LFIA), has further amplified the capabilities of these assays. These advances have expanded the clinical applications of avidity-based assays, making them useful tools for the diagnosis and management of various infectious diseases. This review is structured around several key aspects of IgG avidity in clinical diagnosis, including: (i) a detailed exposition of the IgG affinity maturation process; (ii) a thorough discussion of the IgG avidity assays, including the recently emerged biosensor-based approaches; and (iii) an examination of the applications of IgG avidity in clinical diagnosis. This review is intended to contribute toward the development of enhanced diagnostic tools through critical assessment of the present landscape of avidity-based testing, which allows us to identify the existing knowledge gaps and highlight areas for future investigation.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), one subtype of pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a life-threatening condition characterized by pulmonary arterial remodeling, elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, and blood pressure in the pulmonary arteries, leading to right heart failure and increased mortality. The disease is marked by endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, and vascular remodeling. The role of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a class of medications originally developed for diabetes management, is increasingly being explored in the context of cardiovascular diseases, including PAH, due to their potential to modulate these pathophysiological processes. In this review, we systematically examine the burgeoning evidence from both basic and clinical studies that describe the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular health, with a special emphasis on PAH. By delving into the complex interactions between these drugs and the potential pathobiology that underpins PH, this study seeks to uncover the mechanistic underpinnings that could justify the use of SGLT2 inhibitors as a novel therapeutic approach for PAH. We collate findings that illustrate how SGLT2 inhibitors may influence the normal function of pulmonary arteries, possibly alleviating the pathological hallmarks of PAH such as inflammation, oxidative stress, aberrant cellular proliferation, and so on. Our review thereby outlines a potential paradigm shift in PAH management, suggesting that these inhibitors could play a crucial role in modulating the disease's progression by targeting the potential dysfunctions that drive it. This comprehensive synthesis of existing research underscores the imperative need for further clinical trials to validate the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in PAH and to integrate them into the therapeutic agents used against this challenging disease.

The field of pharmacogenetics, the investigation of the influence of one or more sequence variants on drug response phenotypes, is a special case of pharmacogenomics, a discipline that takes a genome-wide approach. Massively parallel, next generation sequencing (NGS), has allowed pharmacogenetics to be subsumed by pharmacogenomics with respect to the identification of variants associated with responders and non-responders, optimal drug response, and adverse drug reactions. A plethora of rare and common naturally-occurring GPCR variants must be considered in the context of signals from across the genome. Many fundamentals of pharmacogenetics were established for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) genes because they are primary targets for a large number of therapeutic drugs. Functional studies, demonstrating likely-pathogenic and pathogenic GPCR variants, have been integral to establishing models used for in silico analysis. Variants in GPCR genes include both coding and non-coding single nucleotide variants and insertion or deletions (indels) that affect cell surface expression (trafficking, dimerization, and desensitization/downregulation), ligand binding and G protein coupling, and variants that result in alternate splicing encoding isoforms/variable expression. As the breadth of data on the GPCR genome increases, we may expect an increase in the use of drug labels that note variants that significantly impact the clinical use of GPCR-targeting agents. We discuss the implications of GPCR pharmacogenomic data derived from the genomes available from individuals who have been well-phenotyped for receptor structure and function and receptor-ligand interactions, and the potential benefits to patients of optimized drug selection. Examples discussed include the renin-angiotensin system in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection, the probable role of chemokine receptors in the cytokine storm, and potential protease activating receptor (PAR) interventions. Resources dedicated to GPCRs, including publicly available computational tools, are also discussed.

RNA methylation is a widespread regulatory mechanism that controls gene expression in physiological processes. In recent years, the mechanisms and functions of RNA methylation under diseased conditions have been increasingly unveiled by RNA sequencing technologies with large scale and high resolution. In this review, the fundamental concept of RNA methylation is introduced, and the common types of transcript methylation and their machineries are described. Then, the regulatory roles of RNA methylation, particularly N6-methyladenosine and 5-methylcytosine, in the vascular lesions of ocular and cardiopulmonary diseases are discussed and compared. The ocular diseases include corneal neovascularization, retinopathy of prematurity, diabetic retinopathy, and pathologic myopia; whereas the cardiopulmonary ailments involve atherosclerosis and pulmonary hypertension. This review hopes to shed light on the common regulatory mechanisms underlying the vascular lesions in these ocular and cardiopulmonary diseases, which may be conducive to developing therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

This scoping review aimed to synthesize the analytical techniques used and methodological limitations encountered when undertaking secondary research using residual neonatal dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Studies that used residual neonatal DBS samples for secondary research (i.e. research not related to newborn screening for inherited genetic and metabolic disorders) were identified from six electronic databases: Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Medline, PubMed and Scopus. Inclusion was restricted to studies published from 1973 and written in or translated into English that reported the storage, extraction and testing of neonatal DBS samples. Sixty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were predominantly methodological in nature and measured various analytes, including nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, environmental pollutants, markers of prenatal substance use and medications. Neonatal DBS samples were stored over a range of temperatures (ambient temperature, cold storage or frozen) and durations (two weeks to 40.5 years), both of which impacted the recovery of some analytes, particularly amino acids, antibodies and environmental pollutants. The size of DBS sample used and potential contamination were also cited as methodological limitations. Residual neonatal DBS samples retained by newborn screening programs are a promising resource for secondary research purposes, with many studies reporting the successful measurement of analytes even from neonatal DBS samples stored for long periods of time in suboptimal temperatures and conditions.