Pub Date : 2025-03-06DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00970-y
Aditya K Ghosh, Kyle R Stephens, Prem A Kandiah, Ryan T Hurt, Elizabeth A Gilman
Purpose of review: The current review aims to summarize the benefits and limitations of the novel multicancer detection tests (MCD) for diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.
Recent findings: Traditional cancer screening methods can reduce deaths in malignancies involving the GI tract. For GI cancers, screening options vary by type and often involve invasive techniques with limited sensitivity. MCDs offer a promising, non-invasive (simple blood draw) alternative by analyzing biomarkers such as cell-free DNA and RNA using advanced techniques and machine learning to detect cancers across multiple organ sites. Large studies like the PATHFINDER trial and THUNDER study have demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of MCD assays in identifying cancer signals, with high sensitivity and specificity in some GI organs that lack routine screening tests (e.g., liver, pancreas, and stomach). Despite these advancements, MCD testing faces challenges, including high costs, lack of FDA approval, false positives, and limited data on clinical utility in reducing cancer-specific mortality. MCD should not be a substitute for age-appropriate cancer screenings but may complement existing methods, particularly for cancers with no current screening tools, such as cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Clinicians need to discuss the limitations of MCDs, including the potential for overdiagnosis, patient anxiety, and financial burden due to insurance coverage gaps. MCD is a promising, non-invasive test that can augment traditional cancer screening. As the role of MCD in cancer detection evolves, further research is essential to establish how it will be integrated into clinical practice, ensuring informed, shared decision-making with patients.
{"title":"Multicancer Detection (MCD) Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Evolving Tool for Early Diagnosis.","authors":"Aditya K Ghosh, Kyle R Stephens, Prem A Kandiah, Ryan T Hurt, Elizabeth A Gilman","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00970-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-025-00970-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The current review aims to summarize the benefits and limitations of the novel multicancer detection tests (MCD) for diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Traditional cancer screening methods can reduce deaths in malignancies involving the GI tract. For GI cancers, screening options vary by type and often involve invasive techniques with limited sensitivity. MCDs offer a promising, non-invasive (simple blood draw) alternative by analyzing biomarkers such as cell-free DNA and RNA using advanced techniques and machine learning to detect cancers across multiple organ sites. Large studies like the PATHFINDER trial and THUNDER study have demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of MCD assays in identifying cancer signals, with high sensitivity and specificity in some GI organs that lack routine screening tests (e.g., liver, pancreas, and stomach). Despite these advancements, MCD testing faces challenges, including high costs, lack of FDA approval, false positives, and limited data on clinical utility in reducing cancer-specific mortality. MCD should not be a substitute for age-appropriate cancer screenings but may complement existing methods, particularly for cancers with no current screening tools, such as cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Clinicians need to discuss the limitations of MCDs, including the potential for overdiagnosis, patient anxiety, and financial burden due to insurance coverage gaps. MCD is a promising, non-invasive test that can augment traditional cancer screening. As the role of MCD in cancer detection evolves, further research is essential to establish how it will be integrated into clinical practice, ensuring informed, shared decision-making with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143566319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1007/s11894-024-00955-3
Johanna Ferreira, Shari Sheflin-Findling
Purposeof review: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections continue to steadily increase in the United States and remain a major public health challenge. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of HCV infection in children, focusing on recent advancements in screening, diagnosis, and treatment.
Recent findings: Effective screening strategies, including universal screening of pregnant women and nucleic acid testing for all perinatally exposed infants at 2 to 6 months of age, have been implemented to identify infected individuals early. Direct-acting antiviral agents have revolutionized treatment, offering high cure rates for children of all ages. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in achieving HCV elimination. These include the need for improved access to testing and treatment, as well as ongoing efforts to develop a preventive vaccine. Continued research and implementation of effective strategies are essential to reduce the burden of HCV infection.
{"title":"Update on Pediatric Hepatitis C Infection.","authors":"Johanna Ferreira, Shari Sheflin-Findling","doi":"10.1007/s11894-024-00955-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-024-00955-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposeof review: </strong>Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections continue to steadily increase in the United States and remain a major public health challenge. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of HCV infection in children, focusing on recent advancements in screening, diagnosis, and treatment.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Effective screening strategies, including universal screening of pregnant women and nucleic acid testing for all perinatally exposed infants at 2 to 6 months of age, have been implemented to identify infected individuals early. Direct-acting antiviral agents have revolutionized treatment, offering high cure rates for children of all ages. Despite significant progress, challenges remain in achieving HCV elimination. These include the need for improved access to testing and treatment, as well as ongoing efforts to develop a preventive vaccine. Continued research and implementation of effective strategies are essential to reduce the burden of HCV infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870864/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143522811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-27DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00963-x
Ben Storer, Monique Holden, Kelly Ann Kershaw, Taylor A Braund, Cassandra Chakouch, Matthew James Coleshill, Sam Haffar, Samuel Harvey, Gemma Sicouri, Jill Newby, Michael Murphy
Purpose of review: Many patients with chronic health conditions experience anxiety, which can have significant implications on physical health outcomes and quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the prevalence of anxiety in gastroenterology and hepatology outpatients, across factors such as physical health condition, type of anxiety, and patient demographics, with the intention to support clinicians in providing effective patient care.
Recent findings: Several recent systematic reviews have been published investigating rates of anxiety in different outpatient settings, and have found consistently high rates across the dermatology, endocrinology, cardiology and respiratory/sleep medicine fields, ranging between 25.1% and 30.3%. Whilst there are established links between gastroenterology and hepatology conditions with anxiety, there has yet to be a study estimating the overall global prevalence of anxiety in this outpatient setting. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases were searched from database inception to January 2023 for studies reporting anxiety in gastroenterology and hepatology outpatients ≥ 16 years of age. Prevalence was extracted from self-report questionnaires, diagnostic interviews, and records. The final meta-analysis included 81 studies, with 28,334 participants. Pooled prevalence of anxiety was 31.2% (95% CI 28.2%-34.4%). Subgroup analyses identified significant differences in prevalence across anxiety type, with health anxiety showing the highest prevalence at 23.7%, followed by generalised anxiety 14.5%, specific phobia 12.5%, panic disorder/agoraphobia 12.2%, social anxiety 11.3%, post-traumatic stress disorder 4.9%, and obsessive-compulsive disorder 4.2%. No other significant differences were found. Anxiety is thus common amongst gastroenterology and hepatology outpatients, and so it is important that careful consideration be given to the identification and management of anxiety in these settings.
{"title":"Global Prevalence of Anxiety in Gastroenterology and Hepatology Outpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ben Storer, Monique Holden, Kelly Ann Kershaw, Taylor A Braund, Cassandra Chakouch, Matthew James Coleshill, Sam Haffar, Samuel Harvey, Gemma Sicouri, Jill Newby, Michael Murphy","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00963-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-025-00963-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Many patients with chronic health conditions experience anxiety, which can have significant implications on physical health outcomes and quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the prevalence of anxiety in gastroenterology and hepatology outpatients, across factors such as physical health condition, type of anxiety, and patient demographics, with the intention to support clinicians in providing effective patient care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several recent systematic reviews have been published investigating rates of anxiety in different outpatient settings, and have found consistently high rates across the dermatology, endocrinology, cardiology and respiratory/sleep medicine fields, ranging between 25.1% and 30.3%. Whilst there are established links between gastroenterology and hepatology conditions with anxiety, there has yet to be a study estimating the overall global prevalence of anxiety in this outpatient setting. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases were searched from database inception to January 2023 for studies reporting anxiety in gastroenterology and hepatology outpatients ≥ 16 years of age. Prevalence was extracted from self-report questionnaires, diagnostic interviews, and records. The final meta-analysis included 81 studies, with 28,334 participants. Pooled prevalence of anxiety was 31.2% (95% CI 28.2%-34.4%). Subgroup analyses identified significant differences in prevalence across anxiety type, with health anxiety showing the highest prevalence at 23.7%, followed by generalised anxiety 14.5%, specific phobia 12.5%, panic disorder/agoraphobia 12.2%, social anxiety 11.3%, post-traumatic stress disorder 4.9%, and obsessive-compulsive disorder 4.2%. No other significant differences were found. Anxiety is thus common amongst gastroenterology and hepatology outpatients, and so it is important that careful consideration be given to the identification and management of anxiety in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868238/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143514695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-25DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00968-6
Delia O'Shea, Elle Quinn, William Middlesworth, Julie Khlevner
Purpose of review: Esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) causes gastrointestinal (GI) complications that can begin in infancy and extend into adulthood. The etiology of these is frequently multifactorial, and they can adversely affect feeding, growth, respiratory health, and overall quality of life. This review highlights the importance of early diagnosis, multidisciplinary surveillance, and individualized treatment strategies to effectively manage these complications and improve long-term outcomes for affected children.
Recent findings: Recent studies have focused on the development of evidence-based surveillance protocols to optimally manage the numerous observed EA/TEF-associated digestive complications. Many of these complications stem from the combination of gastroesophageal dysmotility and mechanical obstruction inherent to EA/TEF and its surgical management, and include gastroesophageal reflux disease, feeding difficulties, dysphagia, eosinophilic esophagitis, and pulmonary consequences of aspiration. Management of GI complications in children with EA/TEF requires careful, multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment, incorporating dietary modifications, feeding therapy, pharmacotherapy, and surgical and endoscopic interventions.
{"title":"Diagnosis and Management of Long-term Gastrointestinal Complications in Pediatric Esophageal Atresia/Tracheoesophageal Fistula.","authors":"Delia O'Shea, Elle Quinn, William Middlesworth, Julie Khlevner","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00968-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-00968-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) causes gastrointestinal (GI) complications that can begin in infancy and extend into adulthood. The etiology of these is frequently multifactorial, and they can adversely affect feeding, growth, respiratory health, and overall quality of life. This review highlights the importance of early diagnosis, multidisciplinary surveillance, and individualized treatment strategies to effectively manage these complications and improve long-term outcomes for affected children.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have focused on the development of evidence-based surveillance protocols to optimally manage the numerous observed EA/TEF-associated digestive complications. Many of these complications stem from the combination of gastroesophageal dysmotility and mechanical obstruction inherent to EA/TEF and its surgical management, and include gastroesophageal reflux disease, feeding difficulties, dysphagia, eosinophilic esophagitis, and pulmonary consequences of aspiration. Management of GI complications in children with EA/TEF requires careful, multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment, incorporating dietary modifications, feeding therapy, pharmacotherapy, and surgical and endoscopic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143491159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00962-y
Yigit Yazarkan, Gamze Sonmez, Muhammet Enes Gurses, Mete Ucdal, Cem Simsek
Purpose of review: Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are emerging technologies with significant potential in medical education and therapeutic interventions, particularly within gastroenterology. This review aims to explore the current applications of VR and AR in enhancing endoscopy training, procedural skills, and patient comfort, while also identifying their role in non-pharmacological pain management and pre-procedure education.
Recent findings: Extensive research has been conducted on the use of VR and AR in surgical and neurological fields, but their application in gastroenterology is still evolving. VR simulators provide realistic training environments, contributing to improved procedural skills and patient care. Additionally, VR has been shown to reduce patient discomfort and serve as an alternative to sedation during procedures like colonoscopies. AR, specifically in colonoscopies, has demonstrated potential in enhancing polyp detection by overlaying real-time digital information, leading to better diagnostic accuracy. Studies also suggest that VR can improve patient outcomes in functional gastrointestinal disorders and enhance pre-procedure education, increasing patient satisfaction. VR and AR hold significant promise in gastroenterology by advancing both educational and procedural practices. These technologies offer cost-effective, patient-friendly solutions that improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Continued research is essential to fully realize the benefits of VR and AR in gastroenterology, as these tools become more prevalent in clinical practice.
{"title":"Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Use Cases in Gastroenterology.","authors":"Yigit Yazarkan, Gamze Sonmez, Muhammet Enes Gurses, Mete Ucdal, Cem Simsek","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00962-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-00962-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are emerging technologies with significant potential in medical education and therapeutic interventions, particularly within gastroenterology. This review aims to explore the current applications of VR and AR in enhancing endoscopy training, procedural skills, and patient comfort, while also identifying their role in non-pharmacological pain management and pre-procedure education.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Extensive research has been conducted on the use of VR and AR in surgical and neurological fields, but their application in gastroenterology is still evolving. VR simulators provide realistic training environments, contributing to improved procedural skills and patient care. Additionally, VR has been shown to reduce patient discomfort and serve as an alternative to sedation during procedures like colonoscopies. AR, specifically in colonoscopies, has demonstrated potential in enhancing polyp detection by overlaying real-time digital information, leading to better diagnostic accuracy. Studies also suggest that VR can improve patient outcomes in functional gastrointestinal disorders and enhance pre-procedure education, increasing patient satisfaction. VR and AR hold significant promise in gastroenterology by advancing both educational and procedural practices. These technologies offer cost-effective, patient-friendly solutions that improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Continued research is essential to fully realize the benefits of VR and AR in gastroenterology, as these tools become more prevalent in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00959-7
Akash Pandey, Devendra Mehta, Karoly Horvath
Purpose of review: Common indications to evaluate exocrine pancreatic function in children include chronic diarrhea, steatorrhea, failure to thrive, cystic fibrosis and those with chronic abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis where imaging studies are normal [1]. Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) has a spectrum of severity. In children often remains an underdiagnosed condition, particularly in its mild, partial, and isolated enzyme deficiency forms. The purpose of this review is to help understand the different varieties of EPI including isolated pancreatic enzyme deficiencies as possible causes of malnutrition and growth failure in pediatric patients.
Recent findings: Among the indirect diagnostic methods, the fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) testing is the most widely used one. While it has good sensitivity and specificity in severe pancreatic damage, like cystic fibrosis in children, its performance in the diagnosis of mild, partial, and isolated enzyme deficiencies is poor. Direct pancreatic function testing performed during endoscopy (ePFT), has emerged as a more sensitive and specific method for assessing all forms of exocrine pancreatic function. Notably, recent guidelines from the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) emphasize the importance of ePFT in pediatric patients. Most of the pediatric practitioners taught that the pancreas has only two diseases, cystic fibrosis and pancreatitis. They are missing the fact that pancreas, like other digestive organs, can have different, many times secondary, dysfunctions that influence the growth of children. Most pediatric gastroenterologists still use the fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) test, however, this lacks sufficient specificity and sensitivity [2-5] especially in patients with mild or early pancreatic disease or those with isolated enzyme deficiencies [5]. The most accurate diagnostic modality to explore these conditions is ePFT. In this review we highlighted the critical importance of direct pancreatic function testing. Enhancing clinical awareness and incorporating direct testing methods can ultimately improve outcomes for affected children.
{"title":"A Review of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency in Children beyond Cystic Fibrosis and the Role of Endoscopic Direct Pancreatic Function Testing.","authors":"Akash Pandey, Devendra Mehta, Karoly Horvath","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00959-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-00959-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Common indications to evaluate exocrine pancreatic function in children include chronic diarrhea, steatorrhea, failure to thrive, cystic fibrosis and those with chronic abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis where imaging studies are normal [1]. Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) has a spectrum of severity. In children often remains an underdiagnosed condition, particularly in its mild, partial, and isolated enzyme deficiency forms. The purpose of this review is to help understand the different varieties of EPI including isolated pancreatic enzyme deficiencies as possible causes of malnutrition and growth failure in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Among the indirect diagnostic methods, the fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) testing is the most widely used one. While it has good sensitivity and specificity in severe pancreatic damage, like cystic fibrosis in children, its performance in the diagnosis of mild, partial, and isolated enzyme deficiencies is poor. Direct pancreatic function testing performed during endoscopy (ePFT), has emerged as a more sensitive and specific method for assessing all forms of exocrine pancreatic function. Notably, recent guidelines from the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) emphasize the importance of ePFT in pediatric patients. Most of the pediatric practitioners taught that the pancreas has only two diseases, cystic fibrosis and pancreatitis. They are missing the fact that pancreas, like other digestive organs, can have different, many times secondary, dysfunctions that influence the growth of children. Most pediatric gastroenterologists still use the fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) test, however, this lacks sufficient specificity and sensitivity [2-5] especially in patients with mild or early pancreatic disease or those with isolated enzyme deficiencies [5]. The most accurate diagnostic modality to explore these conditions is ePFT. In this review we highlighted the critical importance of direct pancreatic function testing. Enhancing clinical awareness and incorporating direct testing methods can ultimately improve outcomes for affected children.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-16DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00961-z
Zubair Khan, Kambiz Kadkhodayan
Purpose of review: Since the introduction of ERCP and EUS in the 1980s, the field of advanced endoscopy has witnessed significant growth, necessitating formalized fellowship training to ensure competency and patient safety. This article reviews the history and development of Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship (AEF) training in North America, outlining current challenges such as variability in training standards, case volume, and faculty expertise.
Recent findings: General gastroenterology fellowships with apprenticeship model training in advanced endoscopic procedures have been insufficient, prompting the establishment of Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship (AEF) programs across North America. There are emerging trends in interventional endoscopy training, such as competency-based education (CBE), simulation-based training (SBT), and video-based training (VBT). There are new pathways for specialized modular and robotic training and non-traditional routes for EUS and ERCP skill acquisition. Variability across AEF programs remains concerning. This highlights the need for expanded regulatory efforts by organizations like ASGE. Advanced endoscopy training continues to evolve with innovative educational models. However, addressing variability, resource constraints, and employment challenges will be essential to meet the expanding procedural demands of this field and improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Advanced Endoscopy: Future Training Perspectives and Tracks.","authors":"Zubair Khan, Kambiz Kadkhodayan","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00961-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-00961-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Since the introduction of ERCP and EUS in the 1980s, the field of advanced endoscopy has witnessed significant growth, necessitating formalized fellowship training to ensure competency and patient safety. This article reviews the history and development of Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship (AEF) training in North America, outlining current challenges such as variability in training standards, case volume, and faculty expertise.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>General gastroenterology fellowships with apprenticeship model training in advanced endoscopic procedures have been insufficient, prompting the establishment of Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship (AEF) programs across North America. There are emerging trends in interventional endoscopy training, such as competency-based education (CBE), simulation-based training (SBT), and video-based training (VBT). There are new pathways for specialized modular and robotic training and non-traditional routes for EUS and ERCP skill acquisition. Variability across AEF programs remains concerning. This highlights the need for expanded regulatory efforts by organizations like ASGE. Advanced endoscopy training continues to evolve with innovative educational models. However, addressing variability, resource constraints, and employment challenges will be essential to meet the expanding procedural demands of this field and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143432509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-08DOI: 10.1007/s11894-025-00966-8
Ahmad Abulawi, Stephen Hasak, Ricardo Marrero Torres, Harishankar Gopakumar, Seth Richter, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Raya Alashram, Talia F Malik, Aqsa Khan, Neil R Sharma
Purpose of review: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are tumors originating from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract wall (muscularis mucosa, submucosa, or muscularis propria) and are covered by overlying mucosa. They are typically incidental findings during routine endoscopy. This article reviews the latest advancements in endoscopic techniques and devices used to resect subepithelial lesions.
Recent findings: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) should be employed to characterize SELs, with fine needle core biopsy (FNB) utilized with EUS for histopathologic tissue acquisition. EUS can be used as "endoscopic mapping" to mitigate serious complications prior to endoscopic resection. Techniques such as Submucosal Tunnelling Endoscopic Resection (STER), Device-Assisted Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection, and Freehand Full Thickness Resection are available for the complete resection of SELs. The choice of technique depends on the characteristics of the lesion and the level of expertise of the endoscopist. Multiple endoscopic resection techniques for SELs have been developed, each utilizing different tools and devices. A significant shift has occurred from traditional laparoscopic surgical resection to minimally invasive, organ-sparing endoscopic resection. Advancements in "third space" endoscopy and the innovation of novel devices continue to offer less invasive resection techniques for lesions arising from the GI tract wall.
{"title":"Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: Evolution in Management and Endoscopic Resection Techniques.","authors":"Ahmad Abulawi, Stephen Hasak, Ricardo Marrero Torres, Harishankar Gopakumar, Seth Richter, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Raya Alashram, Talia F Malik, Aqsa Khan, Neil R Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00966-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-00966-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are tumors originating from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract wall (muscularis mucosa, submucosa, or muscularis propria) and are covered by overlying mucosa. They are typically incidental findings during routine endoscopy. This article reviews the latest advancements in endoscopic techniques and devices used to resect subepithelial lesions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) should be employed to characterize SELs, with fine needle core biopsy (FNB) utilized with EUS for histopathologic tissue acquisition. EUS can be used as \"endoscopic mapping\" to mitigate serious complications prior to endoscopic resection. Techniques such as Submucosal Tunnelling Endoscopic Resection (STER), Device-Assisted Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection, and Freehand Full Thickness Resection are available for the complete resection of SELs. The choice of technique depends on the characteristics of the lesion and the level of expertise of the endoscopist. Multiple endoscopic resection techniques for SELs have been developed, each utilizing different tools and devices. A significant shift has occurred from traditional laparoscopic surgical resection to minimally invasive, organ-sparing endoscopic resection. Advancements in \"third space\" endoscopy and the innovation of novel devices continue to offer less invasive resection techniques for lesions arising from the GI tract wall.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143373731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can cause significant psychological, physical, and economic burdens on patients and healthcare systems. Studies show over one-fifth of patients will seek nontraditional methods of treatment for managing their symptoms. Understanding the benefits - and potential harms - of these therapies is important to provide holistic and evidence-based care to our IBD patients.
Recent findings: In this review, we present several studied herbal therapies for the management of both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These include cannabinoids, Tripterygium wilfordii, Chios mastic gum, Boswellia serrata, Indigo Naturalis, curcumin, resveratrol, and Zingiber officinale. While these herbal remedies have been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects and positive outcomes in IBD patients, larger scale studies are lacking and the use may be limited by bioavailability, lack of standardization of formulations, and adverse reactions. In reviewing the literature, we discuss the current data available including benefits, adverse reactions, and considerations for use surrounding several of the more common herbal remedies used for IBD.
{"title":"Selected Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Agents in IBD.","authors":"Monica Dzwonkowski, Janak Bahirwani, Samantha Rollins, Alicia Muratore, Vikram Christian, Yecheskel Schneider","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-00960-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11894-025-00960-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can cause significant psychological, physical, and economic burdens on patients and healthcare systems. Studies show over one-fifth of patients will seek nontraditional methods of treatment for managing their symptoms. Understanding the benefits - and potential harms - of these therapies is important to provide holistic and evidence-based care to our IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In this review, we present several studied herbal therapies for the management of both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These include cannabinoids, Tripterygium wilfordii, Chios mastic gum, Boswellia serrata, Indigo Naturalis, curcumin, resveratrol, and Zingiber officinale. While these herbal remedies have been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects and positive outcomes in IBD patients, larger scale studies are lacking and the use may be limited by bioavailability, lack of standardization of formulations, and adverse reactions. In reviewing the literature, we discuss the current data available including benefits, adverse reactions, and considerations for use surrounding several of the more common herbal remedies used for IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1007/s11894-024-00957-1
Anamika Saha, Elizabeth A Berg, Diana Lerner, Robert Kramer, Christopher Nemeh, Jennifer DeFazio, Ali A Mencin
Purpose: To propose a gastrointestinal bleeding management algorithm that incorporates an endoscopic and imaging scoring system and specifies management of vascular complication from button battery ingestion.
Recent findings: Button batteries (BB) are found in many electronic devices and ingestions are associated with serious complications especially in cases of unwitnessed ingestions, prolonged impaction, and in children less than 5 years of age. Gastrointestinal bleeding from BB related vascular injury is rare but often rapidly fatal, with a mortality rate as high as 81%. There are no evidence-based guidelines for managing vascular complications from button battery ingestions. This paper proposes a management algorithm that 1) incorporates both an endoscopic and imaging scoring system to guide initial, post procedure, and discharge care and 2) specifies management of button battery related vascular bleeding. The endoscopic score is a modified Zargar classification with added categories for suspected aneurysm and tracheoesophageal fistula. Surgical and endovascular interventions for vascular injury are also reviewed. Until evidence-based guidelines can be developed, hospitals should have a multidisciplinary protocol based on institutional expertise to rapidly manage BB related vascular injury. Prevention of BB related injury offers the best hope of preventing serious complications and should include increasing public awareness and improving safety standards by working with industry and government.
{"title":"Management of Vascular Complications from Button Battery Ingestions.","authors":"Anamika Saha, Elizabeth A Berg, Diana Lerner, Robert Kramer, Christopher Nemeh, Jennifer DeFazio, Ali A Mencin","doi":"10.1007/s11894-024-00957-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-024-00957-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a gastrointestinal bleeding management algorithm that incorporates an endoscopic and imaging scoring system and specifies management of vascular complication from button battery ingestion.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Button batteries (BB) are found in many electronic devices and ingestions are associated with serious complications especially in cases of unwitnessed ingestions, prolonged impaction, and in children less than 5 years of age. Gastrointestinal bleeding from BB related vascular injury is rare but often rapidly fatal, with a mortality rate as high as 81%. There are no evidence-based guidelines for managing vascular complications from button battery ingestions. This paper proposes a management algorithm that 1) incorporates both an endoscopic and imaging scoring system to guide initial, post procedure, and discharge care and 2) specifies management of button battery related vascular bleeding. The endoscopic score is a modified Zargar classification with added categories for suspected aneurysm and tracheoesophageal fistula. Surgical and endovascular interventions for vascular injury are also reviewed. Until evidence-based guidelines can be developed, hospitals should have a multidisciplinary protocol based on institutional expertise to rapidly manage BB related vascular injury. Prevention of BB related injury offers the best hope of preventing serious complications and should include increasing public awareness and improving safety standards by working with industry and government.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}