Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.2174/0115748863280407240305070905
Zahra Hussain Alshabeeb, Bashayr Alsuwayni, Omar Alshargi, Ahmed H Abdelazeem
Background: Hyperprolactinemia is a commonly underestimated adverse effect of antipsychotic medications. There are still no consensus guidelines for the optimal monitoring and treatment strategies.
Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the monitoring and treatment practices of antipsychotic- induced hyperprolactinemia, in addition to the prevalence and risk factors associated with it.
Methods: A retrospective cohort observational study was conducted among patients attending the psychiatric clinics at an academic tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from May 2020 until May 2021, by reviewing each patient's medical record for up to five years.
Results: Among the 662 patients, 35 patients (5.3%) and 242 patients (36.6%) had their serum prolactin levels monitored (at baseline and at follow-up, respectively). The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia was observed in 212 patients (32%). Only 76 patients (36%) were symptomatic. Female gender, younger age, and bipolar disorder had a significantly higher risk of developing hyperprolactinemia. 60% of the confirmed cases received treatment, of which 76 (60%) were adherent to treatment guidelines. The most common treatment strategies implemented were dose reduction (42.5%) and aripiprazole augmentation (29.1%).
Conclusion: It is imperative to conduct a baseline check of prolactin levels before commencing any antipsychotic therapy. Similarly, routine prolactin level monitoring is recommended regardless of symptoms in patients treated with antipsychotics with a possible prolactin-raising effect. Adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines can improve patient quality of life and therapeutic compliance.
{"title":"Assessment of Monitoring and Management Practices of Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinemia at a Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Zahra Hussain Alshabeeb, Bashayr Alsuwayni, Omar Alshargi, Ahmed H Abdelazeem","doi":"10.2174/0115748863280407240305070905","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863280407240305070905","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperprolactinemia is a commonly underestimated adverse effect of antipsychotic medications. There are still no consensus guidelines for the optimal monitoring and treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the monitoring and treatment practices of antipsychotic- induced hyperprolactinemia, in addition to the prevalence and risk factors associated with it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort observational study was conducted among patients attending the psychiatric clinics at an academic tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from May 2020 until May 2021, by reviewing each patient's medical record for up to five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 662 patients, 35 patients (5.3%) and 242 patients (36.6%) had their serum prolactin levels monitored (at baseline and at follow-up, respectively). The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia was observed in 212 patients (32%). Only 76 patients (36%) were symptomatic. Female gender, younger age, and bipolar disorder had a significantly higher risk of developing hyperprolactinemia. 60% of the confirmed cases received treatment, of which 76 (60%) were adherent to treatment guidelines. The most common treatment strategies implemented were dose reduction (42.5%) and aripiprazole augmentation (29.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is imperative to conduct a baseline check of prolactin levels before commencing any antipsychotic therapy. Similarly, routine prolactin level monitoring is recommended regardless of symptoms in patients treated with antipsychotics with a possible prolactin-raising effect. Adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines can improve patient quality of life and therapeutic compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140130910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.2174/0115748863295706240409053145
Suhitha Roseleena, Poonam Kholiya, N Chandan, Manish Barvaliya, Chandrashekhar Siddapur, Subarna Roy
Introduction: With the increasing use of traditional medicine, there is a need to be vigilant in identifying and reporting adverse reactions associated with them. Punarnava Mandura is a commonly used Ayurvedic medicine for the treatment of anemia. It is well tolerated by the patients. To our knowledge, allergic reactions to Punarnava Mandura have not been reported in the literature. We reported a case of adverse cutaneous reaction, which was probably associated with Purnarnava Mandura.
Case presentation: A 60-year-old female patient developed skin rashes over her neck region after taking Punarnava Mandura and other drugs for osteoarthritis. She recovered upon withdrawal of all the medicines and treatment with anti-allergic drugs. The patient re-initiated treatment for joint pain except for Punarnava Mandura and completed the course without a recurrence of the event making the Punarnava Mandura the culprit drug.
Conclusion: Punarnava Mandura may cause allergic reactions, and clinicians should keep such adverse reactions in mind when using traditional medicine and report them to increase the scientific literature in this area.
{"title":"Suspected Cutaneous Allergic Reactions with Ayurveda Medicine Punaranava Mandura: A Case Report.","authors":"Suhitha Roseleena, Poonam Kholiya, N Chandan, Manish Barvaliya, Chandrashekhar Siddapur, Subarna Roy","doi":"10.2174/0115748863295706240409053145","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863295706240409053145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the increasing use of traditional medicine, there is a need to be vigilant in identifying and reporting adverse reactions associated with them. Punarnava Mandura is a commonly used Ayurvedic medicine for the treatment of anemia. It is well tolerated by the patients. To our knowledge, allergic reactions to Punarnava Mandura have not been reported in the literature. We reported a case of adverse cutaneous reaction, which was probably associated with Purnarnava Mandura.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 60-year-old female patient developed skin rashes over her neck region after taking Punarnava Mandura and other drugs for osteoarthritis. She recovered upon withdrawal of all the medicines and treatment with anti-allergic drugs. The patient re-initiated treatment for joint pain except for Punarnava Mandura and completed the course without a recurrence of the event making the Punarnava Mandura the culprit drug.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Punarnava Mandura may cause allergic reactions, and clinicians should keep such adverse reactions in mind when using traditional medicine and report them to increase the scientific literature in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"237-240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: For surgical procedures of the upper limbs, ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) represents a safe substitute for general anesthesia. The present study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of incorporating 1μg/kg dexmedetomidine (DEX) into 20 ml bupivacaine, as opposed to using 20 ml and 30 ml bupivacaine without additives, in SCBPB.
Methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind study included 75 patients assigned to elective upper-limb surgery under the mid-humerus level. Patients were randomized into three equal groups to receive US-guided SCBPB with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 μg/kg DEX in group BD, 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% without additives in group B20, and 30 ml bupivacaine 0.5% in group B30 (control).
Results: Compared to group B20, groups BD and B30 had significantly quicker onset times for sensory and motor blocks. Groups BD and B30 had a more significant block duration than group B20. Group BD experienced considerably lower intraoperative hemodynamics than groups B20 and B30. Groups BD and B30 had a significantly delayed time to first rescue analgesia and consumed less pethidine than group B20. Compared to group B20, the pain score was significantly reduced in groups BD and B30. Comparable levels of pain score, rescue analgesia time, total pethidine consumption, and motor and sensory block onset and duration were seen in the BD and B30 groups.
Conclusion: DEX with a lower volume (20 ml) of bupivacaine reaches the same result as a higher volume of bupivacaine (30 ml) in managing perioperative pain and hemodynamic stability without the risk of the high volume of bupivacaine. Further, adding DEX to small dose of bupivacaine (20 ml) is more effective than small dose of bupivacaine (20 ml) alone without additives in prolonging the duration of sensory and motor block, reducing pain intensity, and delaying the need for rescue analgesia.
背景:对于上肢外科手术,超声引导的锁骨上臂丛阻滞(SCBPB)是全身麻醉的安全替代品。本研究评估了在20ml布比卡因中加入1μg/kg右美托咪定(DEX)的有效性和安全性,而不是在SCBPB中使用20ml和30ml不含添加剂的布比卡因。方法:这项随机、对照、双盲研究包括75名患者,他们被分配到肱骨中段以下择期上肢手术。患者随机分为三组,分别接受美国导引下的SCBPB治疗,BD组20 ml 0.5%布比卡因+ 1 μg/kg DEX, B20组20 ml不含添加剂的0.5%布比卡因,B30组30 ml 0.5%布比卡因(对照组)。结果:与B20组相比,BD组和B30组感觉和运动阻滞的发病时间明显缩短。BD组和B30组的阻滞持续时间显著高于B20组。BD组术中血流动力学明显低于B20和B30组。与B20组相比,BD组和B30组首次抢救镇痛时间明显延迟,哌啶用量明显减少。与B20组比较,BD组和B30组疼痛评分明显降低。在BD组和B30组中,疼痛评分、抢救镇痛时间、总哌啶消耗量、运动和感觉阻滞的发生和持续时间水平相当。结论:低剂量布比卡因(20ml)与大剂量布比卡因(30ml)在控制围手术期疼痛和血流动力学稳定性方面效果相同,且无大剂量布比卡因的风险。此外,在小剂量布比卡因(20ml)的基础上加DEX比单独使用小剂量布比卡因(20ml)在延长感觉和运动阻滞持续时间、减轻疼痛强度、延迟救援镇痛的需要方面更有效。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Adding 1 μg/Kg Dexmedetomidine to 20 ml Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Basma M Ghoniem, Gamal Hendawy Shams, Wafaa Abdelsalam, Mahmoud Fawzy Elsharkawy","doi":"10.2174/0115748863332349241108094956","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863332349241108094956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For surgical procedures of the upper limbs, ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) represents a safe substitute for general anesthesia. The present study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of incorporating 1μg/kg dexmedetomidine (DEX) into 20 ml bupivacaine, as opposed to using 20 ml and 30 ml bupivacaine without additives, in SCBPB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, double-blind study included 75 patients assigned to elective upper-limb surgery under the mid-humerus level. Patients were randomized into three equal groups to receive US-guided SCBPB with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 μg/kg DEX in group BD, 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% without additives in group B20, and 30 ml bupivacaine 0.5% in group B30 (control).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to group B20, groups BD and B30 had significantly quicker onset times for sensory and motor blocks. Groups BD and B30 had a more significant block duration than group B20. Group BD experienced considerably lower intraoperative hemodynamics than groups B20 and B30. Groups BD and B30 had a significantly delayed time to first rescue analgesia and consumed less pethidine than group B20. Compared to group B20, the pain score was significantly reduced in groups BD and B30. Comparable levels of pain score, rescue analgesia time, total pethidine consumption, and motor and sensory block onset and duration were seen in the BD and B30 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEX with a lower volume (20 ml) of bupivacaine reaches the same result as a higher volume of bupivacaine (30 ml) in managing perioperative pain and hemodynamic stability without the risk of the high volume of bupivacaine. Further, adding DEX to small dose of bupivacaine (20 ml) is more effective than small dose of bupivacaine (20 ml) alone without additives in prolonging the duration of sensory and motor block, reducing pain intensity, and delaying the need for rescue analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"490-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.2174/0115748863344964241106051256
Sulthan Al Rashid, Rajkapoor Balasubramanian, Naina Mohamed Pakkir Maideen
{"title":"SGLT-2 Inhibitors as an Effective Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Hyperuricemia - A Mechanistic Perspective.","authors":"Sulthan Al Rashid, Rajkapoor Balasubramanian, Naina Mohamed Pakkir Maideen","doi":"10.2174/0115748863344964241106051256","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863344964241106051256","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"399-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142709369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.2174/0115748863356840250112181406
Virendra S Gomase
Pharmacovigilance is an important subject in medicine and healthcare, which aims to prevent side effects and other drug-related problems by identifying, evaluating, understanding, and avoiding them. Its main objectives are ensuring that a drug's benefits balance its hazards and improving patient safety. Within medicine and healthcare, pharmacovigilance is an essential subject that focuses on identifying, evaluating, comprehending, and preventing side effects or any other issues associated with drugs. Its main objective is to improve patient safety and ensure a drug's advantages exceed its drawbacks. Pharmacovigilance has evolved significantly as a result of technological advancements, enabling more efficient medication, safety monitoring, and management. The combination of machine learning (ML) with artificial intelligence (AI) for data analysis, adverse reaction prediction, and signal detection, electronic health records (EHRs), and mobile health (mHealth) applications have enhanced real-time data collecting and expedited the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Pharmacovigilance plays an important role which focuses on detecting, assessing, comprehending, and averting adverse medication reactions. Making sure a drug's advantages outweigh its disadvantages is its main objective to improve patient safety. Pharmacovigilance, which balances patient safety, efficacy, and regulatory compliance in clinical trials, is necessary to promote the safe and effective use of drugs.
{"title":"Pharmacovigilance - Technological Advancements, Recent Developments and Innovations.","authors":"Virendra S Gomase","doi":"10.2174/0115748863356840250112181406","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863356840250112181406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacovigilance is an important subject in medicine and healthcare, which aims to prevent side effects and other drug-related problems by identifying, evaluating, understanding, and avoiding them. Its main objectives are ensuring that a drug's benefits balance its hazards and improving patient safety. Within medicine and healthcare, pharmacovigilance is an essential subject that focuses on identifying, evaluating, comprehending, and preventing side effects or any other issues associated with drugs. Its main objective is to improve patient safety and ensure a drug's advantages exceed its drawbacks. Pharmacovigilance has evolved significantly as a result of technological advancements, enabling more efficient medication, safety monitoring, and management. The combination of machine learning (ML) with artificial intelligence (AI) for data analysis, adverse reaction prediction, and signal detection, electronic health records (EHRs), and mobile health (mHealth) applications have enhanced real-time data collecting and expedited the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Pharmacovigilance plays an important role which focuses on detecting, assessing, comprehending, and averting adverse medication reactions. Making sure a drug's advantages outweigh its disadvantages is its main objective to improve patient safety. Pharmacovigilance, which balances patient safety, efficacy, and regulatory compliance in clinical trials, is necessary to promote the safe and effective use of drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"423-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143390314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.2174/0115748863357891250213094516
Uma Agarwal, Khushboo Singhal, Rajiv Kumar Tonk
Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is defined by the persistent use of opioids despite adverse consequences. It is associated with increased mortality and a variety of mental and general medical comorbidities. Risk factors include younger age, male sex, lower educational attainment, lower income, and psychiatric disorders, such as other substance use disorders and mood disorders. Genetics also play a role in susceptibility to opioid use disorders. Long-term selfefficacy in opioid use for non-medical purposes suggests irreversible opioid use disorders. To evaluate the current understanding of opioid use disorders, the limitations in existing treatment approaches were examined, and strategies to improve outcomes through expanded treatment access and personalized care interventions were identified. An analysis was carried out regarding the role of existing pharmacological treatments, barriers within the care cascade, and potential advancements in healthcare delivery and innovation was carried out to address opioid use disorders. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted by searching electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) for articles published over the past 20-25 years. Relevant studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on OUD risk factors, pharmacological treatments, barriers in the care cascade, and strategies for improving care. The selection process prioritized systematic reviews, clinical trials, and key guidelines. Although medications for opioid use disorders are effective, their impact is hindered by systemic issues at multiple levels of care. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive efforts, including professional training, innovative treatments, and healthcare reforms to expand access and personalize care.
{"title":"Opioid Use Disorders: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Strategies to Mitigate Addiction Risks.","authors":"Uma Agarwal, Khushboo Singhal, Rajiv Kumar Tonk","doi":"10.2174/0115748863357891250213094516","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863357891250213094516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is defined by the persistent use of opioids despite adverse consequences. It is associated with increased mortality and a variety of mental and general medical comorbidities. Risk factors include younger age, male sex, lower educational attainment, lower income, and psychiatric disorders, such as other substance use disorders and mood disorders. Genetics also play a role in susceptibility to opioid use disorders. Long-term selfefficacy in opioid use for non-medical purposes suggests irreversible opioid use disorders. To evaluate the current understanding of opioid use disorders, the limitations in existing treatment approaches were examined, and strategies to improve outcomes through expanded treatment access and personalized care interventions were identified. An analysis was carried out regarding the role of existing pharmacological treatments, barriers within the care cascade, and potential advancements in healthcare delivery and innovation was carried out to address opioid use disorders. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted by searching electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) for articles published over the past 20-25 years. Relevant studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on OUD risk factors, pharmacological treatments, barriers in the care cascade, and strategies for improving care. The selection process prioritized systematic reviews, clinical trials, and key guidelines. Although medications for opioid use disorders are effective, their impact is hindered by systemic issues at multiple levels of care. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive efforts, including professional training, innovative treatments, and healthcare reforms to expand access and personalize care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"450-462"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143466914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This extensive review delves into the complex relationship between prolonged use of metformin and the possible emergence of vitamin B12 deficiency (VB12D) in diabetic patients. Metformin, a pivotal element in diabetes management, is constantly linked with decreased absorption of vitamin B12, prompting concerns about the enduring consequences of this interaction. The review systematically amalgamates current evidence, elucidating the prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical ramifications of VB12D induced by consistent consumption of metformin. Exploring the different pathways through which metformin might disrupt the absorption of Vitamin B12, the review encompasses interference with the calcium-dependent membrane activity and alterations of the microbiota present in the gut. A meticulous analysis of experimental studies and human trials is undertaken, accentuating the prevalence of variable VB12D among individuals on long-duration treatment of metformin across diverse populations and age groups. Clinical indications of cobalamin deficiency, spanning haematological abnormalities to neurological complications, are systematically examined. Furthermore, the review delves into the potential implications of cobalamin deficiency associated with metformin on diabetes-related complications and overall patient health. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the intricate interplay between the use of metformin and deficiency of vitamin B12 in diabetic patients, emphasizing the importance that lies in routine monitoring, early detection, and personalized interventions to optimize the long-period safety and efficiency of metformin in the treatment of diabetes. It also proposes future research directions to refine clinical guidelines and enhance the understanding regarding the correlation between diabetes, metformin, and vitamin B12.
{"title":"Long-Term Use of Metformin and Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Diabetes.","authors":"Md Sadique Hussain, Nitya Srivastava, Gurvinder Singh, Rajesh Kumar","doi":"10.2174/0115748863308106240816044733","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863308106240816044733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This extensive review delves into the complex relationship between prolonged use of metformin and the possible emergence of vitamin B12 deficiency (VB12D) in diabetic patients. Metformin, a pivotal element in diabetes management, is constantly linked with decreased absorption of vitamin B12, prompting concerns about the enduring consequences of this interaction. The review systematically amalgamates current evidence, elucidating the prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical ramifications of VB12D induced by consistent consumption of metformin. Exploring the different pathways through which metformin might disrupt the absorption of Vitamin B12, the review encompasses interference with the calcium-dependent membrane activity and alterations of the microbiota present in the gut. A meticulous analysis of experimental studies and human trials is undertaken, accentuating the prevalence of variable VB12D among individuals on long-duration treatment of metformin across diverse populations and age groups. Clinical indications of cobalamin deficiency, spanning haematological abnormalities to neurological complications, are systematically examined. Furthermore, the review delves into the potential implications of cobalamin deficiency associated with metformin on diabetes-related complications and overall patient health. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the intricate interplay between the use of metformin and deficiency of vitamin B12 in diabetic patients, emphasizing the importance that lies in routine monitoring, early detection, and personalized interventions to optimize the long-period safety and efficiency of metformin in the treatment of diabetes. It also proposes future research directions to refine clinical guidelines and enhance the understanding regarding the correlation between diabetes, metformin, and vitamin B12.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"258-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142105169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) makes up about 85% of lung cancer cases, mainly adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Recently, PD-1 inhibitors have become crucial in NSCLC treatment, significantly enhancing survival for some. However, side effects, like skin reactions and hematotoxicity, limit their use, with drug-induced TEN and immunotherapy-induced agranulocytosis as severe adverse effects.
Case presentation: Herein, we have reported the case of a 75-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic Lung Squamous cell Carcinoma (LUSC) in the left lung. He received first-line treatment with one cycle of tislelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, after which he developed Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) and granulocytopenia. To address these two serious immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs), the patient was administered methylprednisolone in combination with gamma globulin for TEN and dexamethasone in combination with G-CSF for agranulocytosis. Antibiotics were also administered according to the patient's medication regimen. After treatment, the patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital. It was also noted that the lung tumor condition improved.
Conclusion: Effective management of severe immune-related side effects from tislelizumab, including TEN and agranulocytosis, can be partly achieved through steroids, gamma globulin, GCSF, and antibiotics. This strategy not only alleviates these adverse effects, but also potentially improves tumor conditions, highlighting the crucial role of vigilant monitoring and management in immunotherapy.
背景:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)约占肺癌病例的85%,主要是腺癌和鳞癌。最近,PD-1抑制剂已成为治疗NSCLC的关键药物,大大提高了部分患者的生存率。然而,皮肤反应和血液毒性等副作用限制了它们的使用,其中药物诱导的TEN和免疫治疗诱导的粒细胞减少症是严重的不良反应:在此,我们报告了一例 75 岁男性患者的病例,他被诊断为左肺转移性肺鳞状细胞癌(LUSC)。他接受了一个周期的替斯利珠单抗联合纳布紫杉醇和卡铂的一线治疗,之后出现了中毒性表皮坏死(TEN)和粒细胞减少症。针对这两种严重的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),患者接受了甲泼尼龙联合丙种球蛋白治疗 TEN,以及地塞米松联合 G-CSF 治疗粒细胞减少症。此外,还根据患者的用药方案使用了抗生素。治疗后,患者康复出院。同时,肺部肿瘤情况也得到了改善:结论:通过使用类固醇、丙种球蛋白、GCSF 和抗生素,可以有效控制替斯利珠单抗引起的严重免疫相关副作用,包括 TEN 和粒细胞减少。这种策略不仅能减轻这些不良反应,还有可能改善肿瘤状况,突出了免疫疗法中警惕性监测和管理的关键作用。
{"title":"Treatment of Tislelizumab-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Agranulocytosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Yanshi Zhou, Honghao Xue, Chenghua Lu, Yemin Zhang, Qingyuan Wu, Jun Zhang, Shiyun Xie, Xiangqian Xu, Xiaoyan Guo","doi":"10.2174/0115748863297885240604111018","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863297885240604111018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) makes up about 85% of lung cancer cases, mainly adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Recently, PD-1 inhibitors have become crucial in NSCLC treatment, significantly enhancing survival for some. However, side effects, like skin reactions and hematotoxicity, limit their use, with drug-induced TEN and immunotherapy-induced agranulocytosis as severe adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Herein, we have reported the case of a 75-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic Lung Squamous cell Carcinoma (LUSC) in the left lung. He received first-line treatment with one cycle of tislelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, after which he developed Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) and granulocytopenia. To address these two serious immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs), the patient was administered methylprednisolone in combination with gamma globulin for TEN and dexamethasone in combination with G-CSF for agranulocytosis. Antibiotics were also administered according to the patient's medication regimen. After treatment, the patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital. It was also noted that the lung tumor condition improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective management of severe immune-related side effects from tislelizumab, including TEN and agranulocytosis, can be partly achieved through steroids, gamma globulin, GCSF, and antibiotics. This strategy not only alleviates these adverse effects, but also potentially improves tumor conditions, highlighting the crucial role of vigilant monitoring and management in immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"361-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307955/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.2174/0115748863277574240125045459
Pinki Phougat, Meenu Beniwal, Garima Kapoor, Navidha Aggarwal, Aanchal Kumari, Rashmi Sharma, Hitesh Chopra, Rohit Sharma, Mohammad Amjad Kamal
In this review paper, we have analyzed the potential and issues associated with Pharmacovigilance (PV). The analysis is divided into four sections: background, stakeholders, data sources, and medicinal chemistry. Each section discusses the current state, the future trends, and the best practices of PV. The main purpose, methods, results, and implications of our analysis are summarized.
Background: PV is the science and practice of monitoring, evaluating, understanding, and preventing adverse drug reactions. PV was established by the World Health Organization in response to the thalidomide tragedy of 1961. The main purpose of PV is to ensure the safety and efficacy of drugs in clinical practice. Stakeholders: PV involves various stakeholders, such as patients, pharmacists, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare professionals, and regulatory authorities. Each stakeholder has a different role and responsibility in reporting, processing, analyzing, and communicating information about adverse drug reactions. Patient engagement is a key factor for enhancing PV practices.
Data sources: PV relies on data from various sources, such as clinical trials, spontaneous reports, electronic medical records, biomedical literature, and patient-reported data in online health forums. These data sources can provide valuable insights into the real-world use and safety of drugs, as well as the preferences and needs of patients. However, these data sources also pose challenges in terms of quality, validity, reliability, and accessibility. Medicinal Chemistry: Medicinal chemistry is the branch of chemistry that deals with the design, synthesis, and evaluation of new drugs and their biological effects. Medicinal chemistry can enhance PV practices by finding new therapeutic indications for existing drugs or compounds that have already been tested for safety and efficacy. Medicinal chemistry also requires careful design and evaluation of covalent inhibitors, bi-substrate inhibitors, stabilizers of protein non-effective conformations, and hydrophobic pocket modifiers to ensure their safety and efficacy.
Implications: PV is a dynamic and evolving discipline that requires collaboration, regulation, education, and innovation to improve patient safety and care. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential and issues associated with PV practices.
{"title":"Role and Responsibilities of Various Stakeholders in Pharmacovigilance.","authors":"Pinki Phougat, Meenu Beniwal, Garima Kapoor, Navidha Aggarwal, Aanchal Kumari, Rashmi Sharma, Hitesh Chopra, Rohit Sharma, Mohammad Amjad Kamal","doi":"10.2174/0115748863277574240125045459","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863277574240125045459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review paper, we have analyzed the potential and issues associated with Pharmacovigilance (PV). The analysis is divided into four sections: background, stakeholders, data sources, and medicinal chemistry. Each section discusses the current state, the future trends, and the best practices of PV. The main purpose, methods, results, and implications of our analysis are summarized.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>PV is the science and practice of monitoring, evaluating, understanding, and preventing adverse drug reactions. PV was established by the World Health Organization in response to the thalidomide tragedy of 1961. The main purpose of PV is to ensure the safety and efficacy of drugs in clinical practice. Stakeholders: PV involves various stakeholders, such as patients, pharmacists, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare professionals, and regulatory authorities. Each stakeholder has a different role and responsibility in reporting, processing, analyzing, and communicating information about adverse drug reactions. Patient engagement is a key factor for enhancing PV practices.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PV relies on data from various sources, such as clinical trials, spontaneous reports, electronic medical records, biomedical literature, and patient-reported data in online health forums. These data sources can provide valuable insights into the real-world use and safety of drugs, as well as the preferences and needs of patients. However, these data sources also pose challenges in terms of quality, validity, reliability, and accessibility. Medicinal Chemistry: Medicinal chemistry is the branch of chemistry that deals with the design, synthesis, and evaluation of new drugs and their biological effects. Medicinal chemistry can enhance PV practices by finding new therapeutic indications for existing drugs or compounds that have already been tested for safety and efficacy. Medicinal chemistry also requires careful design and evaluation of covalent inhibitors, bi-substrate inhibitors, stabilizers of protein non-effective conformations, and hydrophobic pocket modifiers to ensure their safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>PV is a dynamic and evolving discipline that requires collaboration, regulation, education, and innovation to improve patient safety and care. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential and issues associated with PV practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"19-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139691438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.2174/0115748863272041231116104839
Nikhil Dongre, Jayantee Kalita, Usha K Misra
Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder of post-synaptic neuromuscular junction characterised by fatigable muscle weakness and is treated with prednisolone with or without other immunosuppressants, including azathioprine (AZA). Veno-occlusive hepatotoxicity of AZA is a rare complication in MG.
Case report: We report a 35-year-old man with MG, was treated with pyridostigmine, prednisolone, and AZA for 5 years. He presented with abdominal pain and increased fatiguability for 7 days. His serum bilirubin and liver enzymes were elevated, and ultrasound revealed a dilated hepatic vein and portal vein suggestive of veno-occlusive liver disease. The clinical symptoms, liver functions, and ultrasound of the hepatobiliary system normalized after withdrawal of AZA.
Conclusion: A possibility of AZA veno-occlusive hepatoxicity should be considered in a MG patient if presented with abdominal pain, elevated bilirubin and transaminases, and ultrasound showing dilatation of hepatic veins. Physicians should be aware of this complication because this toxicity is reversible following dose reduction or withdrawal of AZA.
{"title":"Azathioprine-induced Veno-occlusive Hepatotoxicity in a Patient with Myasthenia Gravis.","authors":"Nikhil Dongre, Jayantee Kalita, Usha K Misra","doi":"10.2174/0115748863272041231116104839","DOIUrl":"10.2174/0115748863272041231116104839","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder of post-synaptic neuromuscular junction characterised by fatigable muscle weakness and is treated with prednisolone with or without other immunosuppressants, including azathioprine (AZA). Veno-occlusive hepatotoxicity of AZA is a rare complication in MG.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>We report a 35-year-old man with MG, was treated with pyridostigmine, prednisolone, and AZA for 5 years. He presented with abdominal pain and increased fatiguability for 7 days. His serum bilirubin and liver enzymes were elevated, and ultrasound revealed a dilated hepatic vein and portal vein suggestive of veno-occlusive liver disease. The clinical symptoms, liver functions, and ultrasound of the hepatobiliary system normalized after withdrawal of AZA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A possibility of AZA veno-occlusive hepatoxicity should be considered in a MG patient if presented with abdominal pain, elevated bilirubin and transaminases, and ultrasound showing dilatation of hepatic veins. Physicians should be aware of this complication because this toxicity is reversible following dose reduction or withdrawal of AZA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139541969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}