Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-08DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2376144
Vishal Patel, Marcus J Yarwood, Bethany Levick, Daniel C Gibbons, Myriam Drysdale, William Kerr, Jonathan D Watkins, Sophie Young, Benjamin F Pierce, Emily J Lloyd, Helen J Birch, Tahereh Kamalati, Stephen J Brett
Objective: To describe characteristics and acute clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19 treated with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or untreated patients at highest risk per National Health Service (NHS) criteria.
Methods: Retrospective study of non-hospitalized patients between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2022, using data from the Discover-NOW dataset (North-West London). Included patients were aged ≥12 years and treated with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or untreated but expected to be eligible for early treatment per NHS highest-risk criteria. COVID-19-related and all-cause hospitalizations were reported for 28 days from COVID-19 diagnosis (index). Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with advanced renal disease, those aged 18-64 and ≥65 years, and by period of Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 (post-hoc exploratory) predominance.
Results: Overall, 1503 treated and 4044 eligible high-risk untreated patients were included. A high proportion of patients on sotrovimab had advanced renal disease (29.3%), ≥3 high-risk comorbidities (47.6%) and were aged ≥65 years (36.9%). Five of 696 (0.7%) patients on sotrovimab, <5/337 (0.3-1.2%) on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 10/470 (2.1%) on molnupiravir and 114/4044 (2.8%) untreated patients were hospitalized with COVID-19. Similar results were observed across all subgroups. The proportion of patients dying within 28 days of the index period was similarly low across all cohorts (<2%).
Conclusion: Patients receiving sotrovimab appeared to show evidence of multiple high-risk comorbidities. Low hospitalization rates were observed for all treated cohorts across subgroups and periods of predominant variants of concern. These results require confirmation with comparative effectiveness analyses adjusting for differences in underlying patient characteristics.
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 at high risk of disease progression receiving sotrovimab, oral antivirals or no treatment in England: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Vishal Patel, Marcus J Yarwood, Bethany Levick, Daniel C Gibbons, Myriam Drysdale, William Kerr, Jonathan D Watkins, Sophie Young, Benjamin F Pierce, Emily J Lloyd, Helen J Birch, Tahereh Kamalati, Stephen J Brett","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2376144","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2376144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe characteristics and acute clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19 treated with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or untreated patients at highest risk per National Health Service (NHS) criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of non-hospitalized patients between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2022, using data from the Discover-NOW dataset (North-West London). Included patients were aged ≥12 years and treated with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or untreated but expected to be eligible for early treatment per NHS highest-risk criteria. COVID-19-related and all-cause hospitalizations were reported for 28 days from COVID-19 diagnosis (index). Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with advanced renal disease, those aged 18-64 and ≥65 years, and by period of Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 <i>(post-hoc</i> exploratory) predominance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1503 treated and 4044 eligible high-risk untreated patients were included. A high proportion of patients on sotrovimab had advanced renal disease (29.3%), ≥3 high-risk comorbidities (47.6%) and were aged ≥65 years (36.9%). Five of 696 (0.7%) patients on sotrovimab, <5/337 (0.3-1.2%) on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 10/470 (2.1%) on molnupiravir and 114/4044 (2.8%) untreated patients were hospitalized with COVID-19. Similar results were observed across all subgroups. The proportion of patients dying within 28 days of the index period was similarly low across all cohorts (<2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients receiving sotrovimab appeared to show evidence of multiple high-risk comorbidities. Low hospitalization rates were observed for all treated cohorts across subgroups and periods of predominant variants of concern. These results require confirmation with comparative effectiveness analyses adjusting for differences in underlying patient characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2373885
Sebastian Goss, Jan Jedlicka, Elisabeth Strinitz, Sebastian Niedermayer, Daniel Chappell, Klaus Hofmann-Kiefer, Ludwig C Hinske, Philipp Groene
Objective: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurs in up to 30% of patients and its pathophysiology and mechanisms have not been completely described. Hypotension and a decrease in cardiac output are suspected to induce nausea. The hypothesis that intraoperative hypotension might influence the incidence of PONV was investigated.
Material and methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective large single center cohort study. The incidence of PONV was investigated until discharge from post anesthesia care unit (PACU). Surgical patients with general anesthesia during a 2-year period between 2018 and 2019 at a university hospital in Germany were included. Groups were defined based on the lowest documented mean arterial pressure (MAP) with group H50: MAP <50mmHg; group H60: MAP <60mmHg; group H70: MAP <70mmHg, and group H0: no MAP <70mmHg. Decreases of MAP in the different groups were related to PONV. Propensity-score matching was carried out to control for overlapping risk factors.
Results: In the 2-year period 18.674 patients fit the inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of PONV was 11%. Patients with hypotension had a significantly increased incidence of PONV (H0 vs. H50: 11.0% vs.17.4%, Risk Ratio (RR): 1.285 (99%CI: 1.102-1.498), p < 0.001; H0 vs. H60: 10.4% vs. 13.5%, RR: 1.1852 (99%CI: 1.0665-1.3172), p < 0.001; H0 vs. H70: 9.4% vs. 11.2%, RR: 1.1236 (99%CI: 1.013 - 1.2454); p = 0.0027).
Conclusion: The study demonstrates an association between intraoperative hypotension and early PONV. A more severe decrease of MAP had a pronounced effect.
{"title":"Association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative nausea and vomiting: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Sebastian Goss, Jan Jedlicka, Elisabeth Strinitz, Sebastian Niedermayer, Daniel Chappell, Klaus Hofmann-Kiefer, Ludwig C Hinske, Philipp Groene","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2373885","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2373885","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurs in up to 30% of patients and its pathophysiology and mechanisms have not been completely described. Hypotension and a decrease in cardiac output are suspected to induce nausea. The hypothesis that intraoperative hypotension might influence the incidence of PONV was investigated.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted as a retrospective large single center cohort study. The incidence of PONV was investigated until discharge from post anesthesia care unit (PACU). Surgical patients with general anesthesia during a 2-year period between 2018 and 2019 at a university hospital in Germany were included. Groups were defined based on the lowest documented mean arterial pressure (MAP) with group H50: MAP <50mmHg; group H60: MAP <60mmHg; group H70: MAP <70mmHg, and group H0: no MAP <70mmHg. Decreases of MAP in the different groups were related to PONV. Propensity-score matching was carried out to control for overlapping risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 2-year period 18.674 patients fit the inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of PONV was 11%. Patients with hypotension had a significantly increased incidence of PONV (H0 vs. H50: 11.0% vs.17.4%, Risk Ratio (RR): 1.285 (99%CI: 1.102-1.498), <i>p</i> < 0.001; H0 vs. H60: 10.4% vs. 13.5%, RR: 1.1852 (99%CI: 1.0665-1.3172), <i>p</i> < 0.001; H0 vs. H70: 9.4% vs. 11.2%, RR: 1.1236 (99%CI: 1.013 - 1.2454); <i>p</i> = 0.0027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrates an association between intraoperative hypotension and early PONV. A more severe decrease of MAP had a pronounced effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141466782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-19DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2378180
Merve Bilgin Koçak, Neşe Öztürk Atkaya, Muhammet Ali Oruç
Objective: Systemic inflammatory biomarkers recently studied in schizophrenia include neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). SIRI, a novel inflammatory marker, has not been studied in different stages of schizophrenia. We aimed to compare NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI values between psychotic exacerbation and remission values of the same patients with schizophrenia and a healthy control group.
Method: In this study, 86 patients with schizophrenia who were hospitalized due to psychotic relapse, the same patient group who were in remission after treatment, and 86 age-sex-matched healthy control subjects were analyzed. Inflammatory marker values of the patient group in both the psychotic exacerbation (PE) and the remission (R) period were analyzed and compared with healthy controls (HC).
Results: NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI values were significantly higher in the schizophrenia-PE group than in the HC group. NLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI values were significantly higher in the schizophrenia-PE group than in the schizophrenia-R group. MLR values were significantly higher in the schizophrenia-R group than in the HC group.
Conclusion: These findings may be interpreted as NLR, SII, and SIRI, which may be considered as state biomarkers, and MLR may be a trait marker for schizophrenia.
目的:最近研究的精神分裂症全身炎症生物标志物包括中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、单核细胞/淋巴细胞比值(MLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)和全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)。SIRI 是一种新型炎症标志物,尚未在精神分裂症的不同阶段进行过研究。我们的目的是比较同一精神分裂症患者和健康对照组的精神病加重值和缓解值之间的 NLR、MLR、PLR、SII 和 SIRI 值:本研究分析了86名因精神病复发住院的精神分裂症患者、治疗后病情缓解的同组患者以及86名年龄性别匹配的健康对照组受试者。分析了患者组在精神病加重期(PE)和缓解期(R)的炎症标志物值,并与健康对照组(HC)进行了比较:结果:精神分裂症-PE 组的 NLR、MLR、PLR、SII 和 SIRI 值明显高于 HC 组。精神分裂症-PE 组的 NLR、MLR、SII 和 SIRI 值明显高于精神分裂症-R 组。精神分裂症-R 组的 MLR 值明显高于 HC 组:这些发现可被解释为NLR、SII和SIRI,它们可被视为状态生物标志物,而MLR可能是精神分裂症的特质标志物。
{"title":"Evaluation of inflammatory markers obtained from complete blood count in different stages of schizophrenia.","authors":"Merve Bilgin Koçak, Neşe Öztürk Atkaya, Muhammet Ali Oruç","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2378180","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2378180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic inflammatory biomarkers recently studied in schizophrenia include neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). SIRI, a novel inflammatory marker, has not been studied in different stages of schizophrenia. We aimed to compare NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI values between psychotic exacerbation and remission values of the same patients with schizophrenia and a healthy control group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this study, 86 patients with schizophrenia who were hospitalized due to psychotic relapse, the same patient group who were in remission after treatment, and 86 age-sex-matched healthy control subjects were analyzed. Inflammatory marker values of the patient group in both the psychotic exacerbation (PE) and the remission (R) period were analyzed and compared with healthy controls (HC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI values were significantly higher in the schizophrenia-PE group than in the HC group. NLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI values were significantly higher in the schizophrenia-PE group than in the schizophrenia-R group. MLR values were significantly higher in the schizophrenia-R group than in the HC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings may be interpreted as NLR, SII, and SIRI, which may be considered as state biomarkers, and MLR may be a trait marker for schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141558331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-10DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2373883
Jeff Schein, Martin Cloutier, Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle, Maryaline Catillon, Chunyi Xu, Alice Qu, Ann Childress
Objective: To compare safety and efficacy of centanafadine versus methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release (ER; Concerta) in adults with ADHD.
Methods: Without head-to-head trials, anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) of adverse event rates reported across trials and mean change from baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER were conducted. Pooled patient-level data from two centanafadine trials (NCT03605680/NCT03605836) and aggregate data from one published methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial (NCT00937040) were used. Characteristics of individual patients from the centanafadine trials were matched to aggregate baseline characteristics from the methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial using propensity score weighting. A sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the results to the capping of extreme weights (i.e. >99th percentile).
Results: Compared with methylphenidate hydrochloride ER, centanafadine was associated with significantly lower risk of dry mouth (risk difference [RD] in percentage points: -11.95), initial insomnia (-11.10), decreased appetite (-8.05), anxiety (-5.39), palpitations (-5.25), and feeling jittery (-4.73) though a significantly smaller reduction in AISRS score (4.16-point). In the sensitivity analysis, the safety results were consistent with the primary analysis but there was no significant difference in efficacy between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER.
Conclusion: In this MAIC, centanafadine had better safety and possibly lower efficacy than methylphenidate hydrochloride ER. While safety results were robust across analyses, there was no efficacy difference between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER in the sensitivity analysis. Considering its favorable safety profile, centanafadine may be preferred among patients for whom treatment-related adverse events are a concern.
目的比较 centanafadine 与盐酸哌醋甲酯缓释片(ER;Concerta)对成人多动症患者的安全性和有效性:在没有正面试验的情况下,采用锚定匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)来比较各试验报告的不良事件发生率,以及 centanafadine 和盐酸哌醋甲酯缓释片的成人多动症调查者症状评定量表(AISRS)评分与基线相比的平均变化。研究采用了两项 centanafadine 试验(NCT03605680、NCT03605836)的汇总患者数据和一项已发表的盐酸哌醋甲酯 ER 试验(NCT00937040)的汇总数据。使用倾向得分加权法将 centanafadine 试验中单个患者的特征与盐酸哌醋甲酯 ER 试验中的总体基线特征进行匹配。一项敏感性分析评估了结果对极端权重(即高于第99百分位数)上限的稳健性:与盐酸哌醋甲酯ER相比,仙那法定的口干风险(风险差异[RD],以百分点计:-11.95)、初始失眠(-11.10)、食欲下降(-8.05)、焦虑(-5.39)、心悸(-5.25)和紧张不安(-4.73)显著降低,但AISRS评分的降低幅度(4.16分)明显较小。在敏感性分析中,安全性结果与主要分析结果一致,但 centanafadine 和盐酸哌醋甲酯 ER 的疗效没有显著差异:结论:在这一锚定 MAIC 中,与盐酸哌醋甲酯 ER 相比,仙那法定的安全性更好,而疗效可能较低。虽然各项分析的安全性结果都很可靠,但在敏感性分析中,仙那法定和盐酸哌醋甲酯的疗效没有差异。考虑到其良好的安全性,对于担心治疗相关不良事件的患者来说, centanafadine可能是首选药物。
{"title":"Assessment of centanafadine in adults with ADHD: a matching adjusted indirect comparison versus methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release (Concerta).","authors":"Jeff Schein, Martin Cloutier, Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle, Maryaline Catillon, Chunyi Xu, Alice Qu, Ann Childress","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2373883","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2373883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare safety and efficacy of centanafadine versus methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release (ER; Concerta) in adults with ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Without head-to-head trials, anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) of adverse event rates reported across trials and mean change from baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER were conducted. Pooled patient-level data from two centanafadine trials (NCT03605680/NCT03605836) and aggregate data from one published methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial (NCT00937040) were used. Characteristics of individual patients from the centanafadine trials were matched to aggregate baseline characteristics from the methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial using propensity score weighting. A sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the results to the capping of extreme weights (i.e. >99<sup>th</sup> percentile).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with methylphenidate hydrochloride ER, centanafadine was associated with significantly lower risk of dry mouth (risk difference [RD] in percentage points: -11.95), initial insomnia (-11.10), decreased appetite (-8.05), anxiety (-5.39), palpitations (-5.25), and feeling jittery (-4.73) though a significantly smaller reduction in AISRS score (4.16-point). In the sensitivity analysis, the safety results were consistent with the primary analysis but there was no significant difference in efficacy between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this MAIC, centanafadine had better safety and possibly lower efficacy than methylphenidate hydrochloride ER. While safety results were robust across analyses, there was no efficacy difference between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER in the sensitivity analysis. Considering its favorable safety profile, centanafadine may be preferred among patients for whom treatment-related adverse events are a concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141491230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2364815
Stuart M Sprague, Susan Edelstein, David M Spiegel, David P Rosenbaum, Cher Thomas, Daniel E Weiner
{"title":"Effectiveness of tenapanor for treating hyperphosphatemia in patients receiving dialysis: a plain language summary of the OPTIMIZE study.","authors":"Stuart M Sprague, Susan Edelstein, David M Spiegel, David P Rosenbaum, Cher Thomas, Daniel E Weiner","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2364815","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2364815","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study assessed the incremental healthcare costs and resource utilization (HRU) associated with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), as well as variability in these outcomes among patients with gMG and common comorbidities and acute MG-related events.
Methods: Adults with gMG and without MG were identified from a large US database (2017-2021). The index date was the first MG diagnosis (gMG cohort) or random date (non-MG cohort). Cohorts were propensity score matched 1:1. The gMG cohort included subgroups of patients with a 12-month pre-index (baseline) cardiometabolic or psychiatric comorbidity, or a post-index MG exacerbation/crisis. Monthly healthcare costs (2021 USD) and HRU were compared post-index between gMG and non-MG cohorts.
Results: The gMG and matched non-MG cohorts each contained 2,739 patients. Mean incremental healthcare costs associated with MG were $4,155 (gMG: $5,567; non-MG: $1,411), with differences driven by incremental inpatient costs of $2,166 (gMG: $2,617; non-MG: $452); all p < 0.001. The gMG versus non-MG cohort had 4.36 times more inpatient admissions and 2.26 times more outpatient visits; all p < 0.001. Among patients with gMG in cardiometabolic (n = 1,859), psychiatric (n = 1,308), and exacerbation/crisis (n = 419) subgroups, mean monthly healthcare costs were $6,660, $7,443, and $17,330, respectively.
Conclusions: gMG is associated with substantial incremental costs and HRU, with inpatient costs driving the total incremental costs. Costs increased by 20% and 34% among patients with cardiometabolic and psychiatric conditions, respectively, and over three times among those with acute MG-related events. gMG is a complex disease requiring management of comorbidities and treatment options that can prevent acute symptomatic events.
{"title":"Economic burden of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) in the United States and the impact of common comorbidities and acute MG-events.","authors":"Maryia Zhdanava, Jacqueline Pesa, Porpong Boonmak, Qian Cai, Dominic Pilon, Zia Choudhry, Nizar Souayah","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2353381","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2353381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the incremental healthcare costs and resource utilization (HRU) associated with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), as well as variability in these outcomes among patients with gMG and common comorbidities and acute MG-related events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with gMG and without MG were identified from a large US database (2017-2021). The index date was the first MG diagnosis (gMG cohort) or random date (non-MG cohort). Cohorts were propensity score matched 1:1. The gMG cohort included subgroups of patients with a 12-month pre-index (baseline) cardiometabolic or psychiatric comorbidity, or a post-index MG exacerbation/crisis. Monthly healthcare costs (2021 USD) and HRU were compared post-index between gMG and non-MG cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gMG and matched non-MG cohorts each contained 2,739 patients. Mean incremental healthcare costs associated with MG were $4,155 (gMG: $5,567; non-MG: $1,411), with differences driven by incremental inpatient costs of $2,166 (gMG: $2,617; non-MG: $452); all <i>p</i> < 0.001. The gMG versus non-MG cohort had 4.36 times more inpatient admissions and 2.26 times more outpatient visits; all <i>p</i> < 0.001. Among patients with gMG in cardiometabolic (<i>n</i> = 1,859), psychiatric (<i>n</i> = 1,308), and exacerbation/crisis (<i>n</i> = 419) subgroups, mean monthly healthcare costs were $6,660, $7,443, and $17,330, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>gMG is associated with substantial incremental costs and HRU, with inpatient costs driving the total incremental costs. Costs increased by 20% and 34% among patients with cardiometabolic and psychiatric conditions, respectively, and over three times among those with acute MG-related events. gMG is a complex disease requiring management of comorbidities and treatment options that can prevent acute symptomatic events.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140921664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-03DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2359027
Giovambattista Desideri, Valeria Pegoraro, Riccardo Cipelli, Claudio Ripellino, Marco Miroddi, Suada Meto, Mario Gori, Paolo Fabrizzi
Objective: To explore real-life use of the extemporaneous combination of nebivolol and valsartan (NV-EXC) in adult hypertensive patients in Europe.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients starting NV-EXC treatment conducted using prescription databases in Italy, Germany, Hungary, and Poland. The selection period during which study patients were identified covered a time span ranging from 3 to 9 years (until 30 June 2020) according to availability of the different data sources. Patient demographics, clinical information, and treatment adherence, measured by proportion of days covered, were evaluated. Additionally, the potential eligibility of Italian patients for the single pill combination (SPC) of nebivolol and valsartan over a one-year period was estimated.
Results: The study included 170,682 patients initiating NV-EXC across the databases. Most patients were females (from 51 to 60%) and primarily aged over 60 years. Few patients received prescriptions of both available dosages of valsartan (80 and 160 mg) during follow-up (from 3.2 to 8.5%). Common comorbidities included dyslipidemia (19.2%) and diabetes (19.1%). Around 59.5% of patients did not require cardiologic visits during the study period. Adherence to NV-EXC, as indicated by the Italian database, was low in 53.3% of patients, with only 16.1% showing high adherence. The Italian database revealed 680 prevalent NV-EXC users in 2019, estimating a potential 30,222 adult patients eligible for the nebivolol/valsartan SPC.
Conclusions: The combination of nebivolol and valsartan is frequently prescribed for hypertension, but adherence remains a challenge. A potential nebivolol/valsartan SPC holds promise in enhancing adherence and optimizing therapeutic outcomes for hypertension management.
{"title":"Extemporaneous combination therapy with nebivolol/valsartan for the treatment of hypertension: a study of real-world evidence in Europe.","authors":"Giovambattista Desideri, Valeria Pegoraro, Riccardo Cipelli, Claudio Ripellino, Marco Miroddi, Suada Meto, Mario Gori, Paolo Fabrizzi","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2359027","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2359027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore real-life use of the extemporaneous combination of nebivolol and valsartan (NV-EXC) in adult hypertensive patients in Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients starting NV-EXC treatment conducted using prescription databases in Italy, Germany, Hungary, and Poland. The selection period during which study patients were identified covered a time span ranging from 3 to 9 years (until 30 June 2020) according to availability of the different data sources. Patient demographics, clinical information, and treatment adherence, measured by proportion of days covered, were evaluated. Additionally, the potential eligibility of Italian patients for the single pill combination (SPC) of nebivolol and valsartan over a one-year period was estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 170,682 patients initiating NV-EXC across the databases. Most patients were females (from 51 to 60%) and primarily aged over 60 years. Few patients received prescriptions of both available dosages of valsartan (80 and 160 mg) during follow-up (from 3.2 to 8.5%). Common comorbidities included dyslipidemia (19.2%) and diabetes (19.1%). Around 59.5% of patients did not require cardiologic visits during the study period. Adherence to NV-EXC, as indicated by the Italian database, was low in 53.3% of patients, with only 16.1% showing high adherence. The Italian database revealed 680 prevalent NV-EXC users in 2019, estimating a potential 30,222 adult patients eligible for the nebivolol/valsartan SPC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of nebivolol and valsartan is frequently prescribed for hypertension, but adherence remains a challenge. A potential nebivolol/valsartan SPC holds promise in enhancing adherence and optimizing therapeutic outcomes for hypertension management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-12DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2362278
Sobha Sivaprasad, Clare Bailey, Louise Downey, Rose Gilbert, Richard Gale, Ajay Kotagiri, Sajjad Mahmood, Peter Morgan-Warren, Jackie Napier, Nirodhini Narendran, Ian Pearce, Christina Rennie, James Talks, Radek Wojcik, Ravi Jandhyala
Objective: Current cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) emphasize drug costs as the differentiator between NICE recommended anti-VEGF treatments but may neglect real-world non-drug costs of running nAMD services in the UK. To address this, this study identified real-world non-drug service cost items relevant to UK NHS nAMD clinics, including costs arising from operational strain (demand exceeding capacity).
Methods: Cost items were identified by a structured literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, and an expert panel of 10 UK-based ophthalmologists with relevance to real-world practice. These items underwent meta-synthesis and were then determined in a consensus exercise.
Results: Of 237 cost items identified, 217 (91.6%) met the consensus threshold of >0.51 and were included in the nAMD Service Non-Drug Cost Instrument (nAS). Sensitivity of cost items taken from UK Health Technology Assessment (HTA) using the nAS as the reference standard was low (HTAmin: 1.84%, 95% CI 0.50-4.65%; HTAmax: 70.51%, 95% CI 63.96-76.49%). False negative rates showed variable likelihood of misclassifying a service by cost burden depending on prevalence. Scenario analysis using cost magnitudes estimated annual per-patient clinic cost at £845 (within capacity) to £13,960 (under strain) compared to an HTAmin estimate of £210. Accounting for cost of strain under an assumed 50% increase in health resource utilization influenced cost-effectiveness in a hypothetical genericisation scenario.
Conclusion: Findings suggested that HTA underestimates UK NHS nAMD clinic cost burden with cost of strain contributing substantial additional unmeasured expense with impact on CEA. Given potential undertreatment due to strain, durability is suggested as one of the relevant factors in CEA of nAMD anti-VEGF treatments due to robustness under limited capacity conditions affecting UK ophthalmology services.
目的:目前的成本效益分析(CEA)强调药物成本是区分 NICE 推荐的抗血管内皮生长因子治疗方法的标准,但可能忽略了英国 nAMD 服务运行过程中的实际非药物成本。为解决这一问题,本研究确定了与英国国家医疗服务体系 nAMD 诊所相关的现实世界非药物服务成本项目,包括运营压力(需求超过能力)导致的成本:方法:通过对同行评议文献和灰色文献进行结构化文献综述,以及由 10 位英国眼科专家组成的专家小组,确定了与现实世界实践相关的成本项目。这些项目经过元综合,然后在协商一致的基础上确定:结果:在确定的 237 个成本项目中,217 个(91.6%)符合大于 0.51 的共识阈值,并被纳入 nAMD 服务非药物成本工具 (nAS)。以 nAS 为参考标准,从英国卫生技术评估 (HTA) 中提取的成本项目灵敏度较低(HTAmin:1.84%,95% CI 0.50-4.65%;HTAmax:70.51%,95% CI 63.96-76.49%)。假阴性率显示,根据成本负担对服务进行错误分类的可能性因流行程度而异。使用成本幅度进行的情景分析估计,每位患者每年的门诊成本为 845 英镑(能力范围内)至 13960 英镑(紧张状态下),而 HTA 最小估计值为 210 英镑。在假设通用化的情况下,在医疗资源利用率增加 50%的假设条件下,对紧张成本进行核算会影响成本效益:研究结果表明,HTA 低估了英国国家医疗服务体系 nAMD 诊所的成本负担,应变成本造成了大量未计量的额外支出,对 CEA 产生了影响。鉴于应变可能导致治疗不足,因此建议将耐久性作为 nAMD 抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的 CEA 的相关因素之一,因为在英国眼科服务能力有限的条件下,耐久性非常重要。
{"title":"Real-world service costs for neovascular-AMD clinics in the United Kingdom: structured literature review and scenario analysis.","authors":"Sobha Sivaprasad, Clare Bailey, Louise Downey, Rose Gilbert, Richard Gale, Ajay Kotagiri, Sajjad Mahmood, Peter Morgan-Warren, Jackie Napier, Nirodhini Narendran, Ian Pearce, Christina Rennie, James Talks, Radek Wojcik, Ravi Jandhyala","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2362278","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2362278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) emphasize drug costs as the differentiator between NICE recommended anti-VEGF treatments but may neglect real-world non-drug costs of running nAMD services in the UK. To address this, this study identified real-world non-drug service cost items relevant to UK NHS nAMD clinics, including costs arising from operational strain (demand exceeding capacity).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cost items were identified by a structured literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, and an expert panel of 10 UK-based ophthalmologists with relevance to real-world practice. These items underwent meta-synthesis and were then determined in a consensus exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 237 cost items identified, 217 (91.6%) met the consensus threshold of >0.51 and were included in the nAMD Service Non-Drug Cost Instrument (nAS). Sensitivity of cost items taken from UK Health Technology Assessment (HTA) using the nAS as the reference standard was low (HTAmin: 1.84%, 95% CI 0.50-4.65%; HTAmax: 70.51%, 95% CI 63.96-76.49%). False negative rates showed variable likelihood of misclassifying a service by cost burden depending on prevalence. Scenario analysis using cost magnitudes estimated annual per-patient clinic cost at £845 (within capacity) to £13,960 (under strain) compared to an HTAmin estimate of £210. Accounting for cost of strain under an assumed 50% increase in health resource utilization influenced cost-effectiveness in a hypothetical genericisation scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggested that HTA underestimates UK NHS nAMD clinic cost burden with cost of strain contributing substantial additional unmeasured expense with impact on CEA. Given potential undertreatment due to strain, durability is suggested as one of the relevant factors in CEA of nAMD anti-VEGF treatments due to robustness under limited capacity conditions affecting UK ophthalmology services.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141179071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-10DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945
Cerina Dubois, Elizabeth C Danielson, Molly Beestrum, Dean T Eurich
Objective: Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.
Methods: The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.
Results: Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.
Conclusions: There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.
目的:尽管对骨关节炎(OA)有药物治疗,但越来越多的人选择医用大麻来控制 OA 症状和减少 OA 的阿片类药物处方。本系统综述研究了使用医用大麻治疗 OA 疼痛和功能的全球证据:在 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase 和 CINAHL 中完成了过去 10 年(2012-2022 年)的检索。我们仅限于搜索英文文章。我们不包括灰色文献或病例研究。参与者的人口统计学特征包括所有使用医用大麻治疗 OA 的成年 OA 患者。我们使用 "建议、评估、开发和评价分级 "框架和 "干预措施非随机研究中的偏倚风险 "工具对研究质量和偏倚风险进行了评估。我们采用了叙事综合法:结果:共纳入 7 项研究:结果:共纳入了 7 项研究:2 项随机对照试验 (RCT) 和 5 项观察性研究。2 项随机对照试验中只有 1 项报告了大麻使用者的疼痛有所改善。所有 5 项观察性研究都报告了疼痛程度的改善、阿片类药物使用的减少和/或 OA 整体功能的改善。尽管存在较高的偏倚风险和较低的研究质量,但各项研究一致认为,使用医用大麻对患有 OA 疼痛的亚群体有效:支持使用医用大麻替代 OA 初级药物治疗的证据质量不高。然而,这并不能否定医用大麻可为部分患者提供治疗缓解的观察结果:CRD42022354026。
{"title":"Medical cannabis and its efficacy/effectiveness on the management of osteoarthritis pain and function.","authors":"Cerina Dubois, Elizabeth C Danielson, Molly Beestrum, Dean T Eurich","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review propsero registration: </strong>CRD42022354026.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141237424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a perplexed condition addressing endocrinal, cardiometabolic and gynaecological issues. It affects women of adolescent age and is drastically increasing in the Indo-Asian ethnicity over the recent years. According to Rotterdam criteria, PCOS is characterized by clinical or biochemical excess androgen and polycystic ovarian morphology; however, it has been established in the recent years that PCOS exacerbates to further serious metabolic conditions on the long term. This is a narrative literature review and not systematic review and is based on PubMed searches with relevant keywords "Polycystic ovarian syndrome AND acarbose OR metformin OR myoinositol; PCOS AND metabolic syndrome OR cardiovascular disease OR menstrual irregularity OR infertility OR chronic anovulation OR clinical hyperandrogenism" used in the title and are limited to articles published in English language with no time limits. A prominent aspect of PCOS is hyperandrogenaemia and hyperinsulinemia. About 50-70% of afflicted women have compensatory hyperinsulinemia and close to one tierce suffer from anovulation and infertility. Insulin resistance leads to metabolic complications and works with luteinizing hormone in increasing the ovarian androgen production. This excess androgen leads to clinical manifestations, irregular menstrual cycles and infertility. There isn't an entire cure, only the symptomatic clinical factors are considered rather than focusing on the underlying long-term complications. Therefore, the article focuses on a potent alpha glucosidase inhibitor, acarbose which suppresses the post meal glucose and insulin by delaying the absorption of complex carbs. It exhibits cardio-metabolic and hormonal benefits and is well tolerable in the south asian population. This review highlights the safety, effectiveness of acarbose in ameliorating the long-term complications of PCOS.
{"title":"Therapeutic potential of acarbose in ameliorating the metabolic and endocrinological complications of polycystic ovarian syndrome: a review.","authors":"Marina Andavar, Raju Kamaraj, Thangavel Mahalingam Vijayakumar, Anuradha Murugesan","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2358237","DOIUrl":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2358237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a perplexed condition addressing endocrinal, cardiometabolic and gynaecological issues. It affects women of adolescent age and is drastically increasing in the Indo-Asian ethnicity over the recent years. According to Rotterdam criteria, PCOS is characterized by clinical or biochemical excess androgen and polycystic ovarian morphology; however, it has been established in the recent years that PCOS exacerbates to further serious metabolic conditions on the long term. This is a narrative literature review and not systematic review and is based on PubMed searches with relevant keywords \"Polycystic ovarian syndrome AND acarbose OR metformin OR myoinositol; PCOS AND metabolic syndrome OR cardiovascular disease OR menstrual irregularity OR infertility OR chronic anovulation OR clinical hyperandrogenism\" used in the title and are limited to articles published in English language with no time limits. A prominent aspect of PCOS is hyperandrogenaemia and hyperinsulinemia. About 50-70% of afflicted women have compensatory hyperinsulinemia and close to one tierce suffer from anovulation and infertility. Insulin resistance leads to metabolic complications and works with luteinizing hormone in increasing the ovarian androgen production. This excess androgen leads to clinical manifestations, irregular menstrual cycles and infertility. There isn't an entire cure, only the symptomatic clinical factors are considered rather than focusing on the underlying long-term complications. Therefore, the article focuses on a potent alpha glucosidase inhibitor, acarbose which suppresses the post meal glucose and insulin by delaying the absorption of complex carbs. It exhibits cardio-metabolic and hormonal benefits and is well tolerable in the south asian population. This review highlights the safety, effectiveness of acarbose in ameliorating the long-term complications of PCOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141075399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}