首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Critical Care最新文献

英文 中文
Infection risks in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. 持续肾替代治疗和体外膜氧合治疗患者的感染风险。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001315
Antoine Gaillet, Jean-François Timsit

Purpose of review: This review addresses the growing concern over nosocomial infections in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). As the use of these modalities increases, particularly in critically ill patients, infection-related complications remain frequent, underdiagnosed, and inadequately addressed in existing guidelines. This review is timely given the urgent need to standardize diagnostic and preventive strategies in this high-risk population.

Recent findings: Recent studies highlight the multifactorial origin of infection risk in ECMO/CRRT patients, including device-related immunoparalysis. In patients on ECMO, nosocomial infections - particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), bloodstream infections (BSIs), and cannula-related infections (CRIs) - are among the most frequent complications, with incidence rates ranging from 9% to 64%. VAP and BSIs occur at rates up to 61 and 38 per 1000 ECMO-days, respectively. Predominant pathogens include Enterobacterales, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, Enterococcus spp., and fungi. Enterococcus-related BSIs are notably underrecognized and often inadequately treated. Duration of ECMO support is the most consistent infection risk factor, along with illness severity and CRRT co-initiation. Nosocomial infections are associated with a 32% relative increase in mortality.

Summary: Nosocomial infections in ECMO/CRRT patients are common, diagnostically challenging, and strongly linked to poor outcomes. Their prevention and management require an integrated, tailored strategy. Standardized definitions, improved surveillance, and targeted antimicrobial stewardship are urgently needed to mitigate risks in this vulnerable population.

综述目的:本综述探讨了接受体外膜氧合(ECMO)和/或持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)的患者对院内感染的日益关注。随着这些模式的使用增加,特别是在危重患者中,感染相关并发症仍然频繁,诊断不足,并且在现有指南中没有得到充分解决。鉴于迫切需要规范这一高危人群的诊断和预防策略,本综述是及时的。最近的发现:最近的研究强调了ECMO/CRRT患者感染风险的多因素起源,包括器械相关的免疫麻痹。在ECMO患者中,院内感染——特别是呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)、血流感染(bsi)和插管相关感染(CRIs)——是最常见的并发症,发病率从9%到64%不等。VAP和bsi的发生率分别高达61和38 / 1000 ECMO-days。主要病原体包括肠杆菌、非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌、肠球菌和真菌。与肠球菌相关的脑损伤明显未被充分认识,而且往往治疗不充分。ECMO支持的持续时间是最一致的感染风险因素,以及疾病严重程度和CRRT共同启动。医院感染与死亡率相对增加32%相关。总结:ECMO/CRRT患者的院内感染很常见,诊断上具有挑战性,并且与不良预后密切相关。它们的预防和管理需要一个综合的、有针对性的战略。迫切需要标准化的定义、改进的监测和有针对性的抗微生物药物管理,以减轻这一弱势群体的风险。
{"title":"Infection risks in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Antoine Gaillet, Jean-François Timsit","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001315","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review addresses the growing concern over nosocomial infections in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). As the use of these modalities increases, particularly in critically ill patients, infection-related complications remain frequent, underdiagnosed, and inadequately addressed in existing guidelines. This review is timely given the urgent need to standardize diagnostic and preventive strategies in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies highlight the multifactorial origin of infection risk in ECMO/CRRT patients, including device-related immunoparalysis. In patients on ECMO, nosocomial infections - particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), bloodstream infections (BSIs), and cannula-related infections (CRIs) - are among the most frequent complications, with incidence rates ranging from 9% to 64%. VAP and BSIs occur at rates up to 61 and 38 per 1000 ECMO-days, respectively. Predominant pathogens include Enterobacterales, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, Enterococcus spp., and fungi. Enterococcus-related BSIs are notably underrecognized and often inadequately treated. Duration of ECMO support is the most consistent infection risk factor, along with illness severity and CRRT co-initiation. Nosocomial infections are associated with a 32% relative increase in mortality.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Nosocomial infections in ECMO/CRRT patients are common, diagnostically challenging, and strongly linked to poor outcomes. Their prevention and management require an integrated, tailored strategy. Standardized definitions, improved surveillance, and targeted antimicrobial stewardship are urgently needed to mitigate risks in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"539-546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors affecting critical care outcomes in the emergency department. 影响急诊科重症监护结果的因素
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001300
Taylor M Fontenot, Ioana Antonescu, Heatherlee Bailey

Purpose of review: Emergency department (ED) outcomes of the critically ill and injured patient are intricately linked with timeliness of care, advances in resuscitation skills and technology, and the cohesive function of a dedicated team of multiprofessionals. This review highlights the most recent developments in ED resuscitation and their impact on outcomes for critically ill and injured patients, emphasizing the crucial interplay between technological advancements, organizational strategies, and team dynamics in optimizing emergency care.

Recent findings: The literature reveals notable enhancements in resuscitation techniques and protocols, integrating technologic advances, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, which have shown promising improvement in efficiency, diagnostics, and timeliness to therapeutics. Optimization of the physical ED environment to expedite delivery of care, with an emphasis on effective communication, standardized protocols and guidelines, and teamwork are crucial elements in improving overall patient outcomes. Significant challenges persist, despite these advancements, particularly in ED overcrowding, clinician burnout, and delays in definitive treatment.

Summary: The findings highlight the importance of a collaborative multidisciplinary approach to resuscitation in the ED. Implementing a multifaceted approach involving technology, diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic interventions, and education offers an opportunity to improve outcomes in the ED. Future research should continue to focus strategies to address the systematic issues that impact overall patient care in the emergency setting.

综述目的:急诊科(ED)重症和受伤患者的预后与护理的及时性、复苏技能和技术的进步以及多专业团队的凝聚力密切相关。本文综述了急诊科复苏的最新进展及其对危重患者和受伤患者预后的影响,强调了技术进步、组织策略和团队动态在优化急诊护理中的重要相互作用。最新发现:文献揭示了复苏技术和方案的显着增强,整合了人工智能和机器学习等技术进步,这些技术进步在效率、诊断和治疗及时性方面显示出有希望的改善。优化急诊科的物理环境以加快护理的提供,强调有效的沟通、标准化的协议和指南以及团队合作是改善患者整体预后的关键因素。尽管取得了这些进步,但仍存在重大挑战,特别是在急诊科过度拥挤、临床医生倦怠和最终治疗延迟方面。总结:研究结果强调了在急诊科采用多学科合作的复苏方法的重要性。实施涉及技术、诊断准确性、治疗干预和教育的多方面方法为改善急诊科的结果提供了机会。未来的研究应继续关注解决影响急诊患者整体护理的系统性问题的策略。
{"title":"Factors affecting critical care outcomes in the emergency department.","authors":"Taylor M Fontenot, Ioana Antonescu, Heatherlee Bailey","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001300","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001300","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Emergency department (ED) outcomes of the critically ill and injured patient are intricately linked with timeliness of care, advances in resuscitation skills and technology, and the cohesive function of a dedicated team of multiprofessionals. This review highlights the most recent developments in ED resuscitation and their impact on outcomes for critically ill and injured patients, emphasizing the crucial interplay between technological advancements, organizational strategies, and team dynamics in optimizing emergency care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The literature reveals notable enhancements in resuscitation techniques and protocols, integrating technologic advances, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, which have shown promising improvement in efficiency, diagnostics, and timeliness to therapeutics. Optimization of the physical ED environment to expedite delivery of care, with an emphasis on effective communication, standardized protocols and guidelines, and teamwork are crucial elements in improving overall patient outcomes. Significant challenges persist, despite these advancements, particularly in ED overcrowding, clinician burnout, and delays in definitive treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of a collaborative multidisciplinary approach to resuscitation in the ED. Implementing a multifaceted approach involving technology, diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic interventions, and education offers an opportunity to improve outcomes in the ED. Future research should continue to focus strategies to address the systematic issues that impact overall patient care in the emergency setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"566-574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144625553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corticosteroids in septic shock: a double-edged sword. 皮质类固醇治疗感染性休克:一把双刃剑。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001297
Jane Y Wang, Marin H Kollef

Purpose of review: Corticosteroid therapy remains controversial in the management of septic shock. The putative benefits of glucocorticoids on immunomodulation and rescue of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation has made it an attractive target for clinical research. However, conflicting trial results have introduced uncertainty into clinical guidance, while risk of harm continues to be a concern. This review summarizes and interprets the current body of evidence for the role of corticosteroid therapy in septic shock and suggests future directions for continued investigation.

Recent findings: Updated guidelines continue to recommend corticosteroids in septic shock, but more robust data for corticosteroids have emerged in community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which may account for some of the benefit seen in trials on septic shock. Systematic reviews have suggested potential benefits of combination therapy with fludrocortisone, but further research is needed. Significant variation exists in corticosteroid prescribing practices across providers and ICU settings.

Summary: Many uncertainties remain regarding utility of corticosteroids in septic shock. However, they remain a tool for refractory shock in appropriate patients where benefits outweigh harm. Future research should focus on individualized approaches to corticosteroid therapy.

综述目的:在脓毒性休克的治疗中,皮质类固醇治疗仍然存在争议。糖皮质激素在免疫调节和拯救下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴失调方面的潜在益处使其成为临床研究的一个有吸引力的目标。然而,相互矛盾的试验结果给临床指导带来了不确定性,而危害风险仍然是一个问题。这篇综述总结和解释了目前关于皮质类固醇治疗在感染性休克中的作用的证据,并提出了未来继续研究的方向。最新发现:更新的指南继续推荐在感染性休克中使用皮质类固醇,但在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)中出现了更可靠的皮质类固醇数据,这可能解释了在感染性休克试验中看到的一些益处。系统评价表明与氟化可的松联合治疗的潜在益处,但需要进一步的研究。不同提供者和ICU设置的皮质类固醇处方实践存在显著差异。总结:关于皮质类固醇在感染性休克中的应用仍有许多不确定因素。然而,在利大于弊的情况下,它们仍然是治疗难治性休克的合适患者的工具。未来的研究应侧重于皮质类固醇治疗的个体化方法。
{"title":"Corticosteroids in septic shock: a double-edged sword.","authors":"Jane Y Wang, Marin H Kollef","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001297","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Corticosteroid therapy remains controversial in the management of septic shock. The putative benefits of glucocorticoids on immunomodulation and rescue of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation has made it an attractive target for clinical research. However, conflicting trial results have introduced uncertainty into clinical guidance, while risk of harm continues to be a concern. This review summarizes and interprets the current body of evidence for the role of corticosteroid therapy in septic shock and suggests future directions for continued investigation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Updated guidelines continue to recommend corticosteroids in septic shock, but more robust data for corticosteroids have emerged in community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which may account for some of the benefit seen in trials on septic shock. Systematic reviews have suggested potential benefits of combination therapy with fludrocortisone, but further research is needed. Significant variation exists in corticosteroid prescribing practices across providers and ICU settings.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Many uncertainties remain regarding utility of corticosteroids in septic shock. However, they remain a tool for refractory shock in appropriate patients where benefits outweigh harm. Future research should focus on individualized approaches to corticosteroid therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"497-504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144526764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of artificial intelligence in ICU therapeutic decision-making for severe infections. 人工智能在重症感染ICU治疗决策中的作用。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001304
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti

Purpose of review: To discuss current and future role of artificial intelligence in predicting severe infections and supporting decisions on antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU), focusing in particular on some relevant conceptual changes compared to classical clinical reasoning.

Recent findings: Several studies have evaluated the ability of machine learning techniques for severe infection prediction, while other studies have explored the potential of large language models (LLM)-based tools to assist clinicians in deciding which antimicrobial agent(s) to prescribe to patients with severe infections.

Summary: The support of artificial intelligence for infection prediction and antimicrobial prescribing has shown the potential to improve the treatment of severe infections in ICU. However, the limited number of studies focused on ICU should be highlighted, along with the need to thoroughly address the issue of patients' privacy and to improve the ethical and legal frameworks for decision accountability, as well as the transparency and quality of training data. A standardized approach to the accuracy-interpretability trade-off would also be essential to outline a correct and shared approach both for the future conduct of studies and for the interpretation of their evidence for clinical practice.

综述目的:探讨人工智能在预测重症监护病房(ICU)重症患者严重感染和支持抗生素治疗决策方面的当前和未来作用,特别关注与经典临床推理相比的一些相关概念变化。最近的发现:一些研究已经评估了机器学习技术用于严重感染预测的能力,而其他研究已经探索了基于大型语言模型(LLM)的工具的潜力,以帮助临床医生决定为严重感染患者开哪种抗菌剂。摘要:人工智能对感染预测和抗菌药物处方的支持显示出改善ICU重症感染治疗的潜力。然而,应该强调的是,关注ICU的研究数量有限,同时需要彻底解决患者隐私问题,改善决策问责的道德和法律框架,以及培训数据的透明度和质量。准确性和可解释性权衡的标准化方法对于未来的研究行为和临床实践证据的解释都是必不可少的。
{"title":"Role of artificial intelligence in ICU therapeutic decision-making for severe infections.","authors":"Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001304","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To discuss current and future role of artificial intelligence in predicting severe infections and supporting decisions on antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU), focusing in particular on some relevant conceptual changes compared to classical clinical reasoning.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several studies have evaluated the ability of machine learning techniques for severe infection prediction, while other studies have explored the potential of large language models (LLM)-based tools to assist clinicians in deciding which antimicrobial agent(s) to prescribe to patients with severe infections.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The support of artificial intelligence for infection prediction and antimicrobial prescribing has shown the potential to improve the treatment of severe infections in ICU. However, the limited number of studies focused on ICU should be highlighted, along with the need to thoroughly address the issue of patients' privacy and to improve the ethical and legal frameworks for decision accountability, as well as the transparency and quality of training data. A standardized approach to the accuracy-interpretability trade-off would also be essential to outline a correct and shared approach both for the future conduct of studies and for the interpretation of their evidence for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"547-553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12573687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute respiratory distress syndrome: new pathophysiological insights. 急性呼吸窘迫综合征:新的病理生理学见解。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001303
Asyl Harbiye, Hélène B van den Heuvel, Lieuwe D J Bos, Leonoor S Boers

Purpose of review: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a major cause of critical illness with high morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in supportive care, targeted therapies have failed, in part due to an incomplete understanding of alveolar immune dysregulation. This review provides a timely synthesis of emerging mechanisms in alveolar immune dysregulation that underlie the development and persistence of ARDS.

Recent findings: Recent studies highlight the role of neutrophil heterogeneity, alveolar macrophage-derived extracellular vesicle signaling, and epithelial barrier dysfunction in driving hyperinflammation and susceptibility to secondary infections. Mechanical ventilation strategies, particularly those influencing driving pressure, further shape the alveolar immune environment. Cross-talk between immune cells and mechanical forces appears central to the pathogenesis of sustained lung injury.

Summary: Understanding the dynamic interplay between alveolar immune responses and secondary insults is critical for the development of precision medicine approaches in ARDS. Future research should prioritize the identification of compartment-specific biomarkers and therapeutic targets aimed at restoring immune balance and preventing nonresolving lung injury.

回顾目的:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)仍然是重症的主要原因,具有高发病率和死亡率。尽管支持治疗取得了进展,但靶向治疗失败了,部分原因是对肺泡免疫失调的理解不完全。这篇综述及时综合了肺泡免疫失调的新机制,这些机制是ARDS发展和持续的基础。最近的发现:最近的研究强调了中性粒细胞异质性、肺泡巨噬细胞来源的细胞外囊泡信号和上皮屏障功能障碍在驱动高发炎症和继发感染易感性中的作用。机械通气策略,特别是那些影响驱动压力的策略,进一步塑造了肺泡免疫环境。免疫细胞和机械力之间的相互作用似乎是持续肺损伤发病机制的核心。摘要:了解肺泡免疫反应与继发性损伤之间的动态相互作用对ARDS精准医学方法的发展至关重要。未来的研究应优先确定室特异性生物标志物和治疗靶点,旨在恢复免疫平衡和预防非解决性肺损伤。
{"title":"Acute respiratory distress syndrome: new pathophysiological insights.","authors":"Asyl Harbiye, Hélène B van den Heuvel, Lieuwe D J Bos, Leonoor S Boers","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001303","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a major cause of critical illness with high morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in supportive care, targeted therapies have failed, in part due to an incomplete understanding of alveolar immune dysregulation. This review provides a timely synthesis of emerging mechanisms in alveolar immune dysregulation that underlie the development and persistence of ARDS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies highlight the role of neutrophil heterogeneity, alveolar macrophage-derived extracellular vesicle signaling, and epithelial barrier dysfunction in driving hyperinflammation and susceptibility to secondary infections. Mechanical ventilation strategies, particularly those influencing driving pressure, further shape the alveolar immune environment. Cross-talk between immune cells and mechanical forces appears central to the pathogenesis of sustained lung injury.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Understanding the dynamic interplay between alveolar immune responses and secondary insults is critical for the development of precision medicine approaches in ARDS. Future research should prioritize the identification of compartment-specific biomarkers and therapeutic targets aimed at restoring immune balance and preventing nonresolving lung injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"575-581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting post-traumatic stress disorder in relatives of critically ill patients. 预测危重病人亲属的创伤后应激障碍。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001309
Thibault Dupont, Edouard Duchesnay, Frédéric Pochard, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Elie Azoulay

Purpose of review: Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affect up to a third of relatives of ICU patients. This review updates the epidemiology, risk factors, and emphasizes the importance of PTSD prevention to mitigate long-term impact on family members. It also sheds light on the latest artificial intelligence-based approaches attempting to predict PTSD and the numerous challenges they face before reaching clinical application.

Recent findings: Recent literature confirms that one third of relatives of ICU patients present significant PTSD-related symptoms at least 3  months after ICU discharge. A vast majority of risk factors associated with PTSD are non modifiable demographic characteristics, but some are modifiable and accessible to targeted interventions that aim to enhance the overall quality of families' experiences in the ICU. Recent research attempts to develop models to accurately predict family PTSD based on easily accessible data at the time of ICU discharge.

Summary: Relatives of ICU patients are at high risk of developing PTSD in the aftermath of an ICU stay. Accurate prediction of PTSD in relatives using artificial intelligence-based prediction systems could help stratify relatives at high risk, allowing timely management to mitigate its long-term impact. Beyond classification metrics benchmarks , further research is required to assess these algorithms in terms of clinical relevance, risk of bias and clinician adoption.

回顾的目的:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的症状影响多达三分之一的ICU患者的亲属。这篇综述更新了流行病学、危险因素,并强调了预防PTSD对减轻对家庭成员的长期影响的重要性。它还揭示了试图预测创伤后应激障碍的最新基于人工智能的方法,以及它们在进入临床应用之前面临的众多挑战。最近的发现:最近的文献证实,三分之一的ICU患者的亲属在ICU出院后至少3个月出现明显的ptsd相关症状。绝大多数与创伤后应激障碍相关的危险因素是无法改变的人口统计学特征,但有些是可以改变的,并且可以进行有针对性的干预,旨在提高ICU家庭体验的整体质量。最近的研究试图建立基于ICU出院时易于获取的数据的模型来准确预测家庭创伤后应激障碍。总结:ICU患者的亲属在ICU住院后发生PTSD的风险很高。使用基于人工智能的预测系统准确预测亲属的创伤后应激障碍,可以帮助对高风险亲属进行分层,从而及时管理以减轻其长期影响。除了分类指标基准之外,还需要进一步的研究来评估这些算法在临床相关性、偏倚风险和临床医生采用方面的作用。
{"title":"Predicting post-traumatic stress disorder in relatives of critically ill patients.","authors":"Thibault Dupont, Edouard Duchesnay, Frédéric Pochard, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Elie Azoulay","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001309","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affect up to a third of relatives of ICU patients. This review updates the epidemiology, risk factors, and emphasizes the importance of PTSD prevention to mitigate long-term impact on family members. It also sheds light on the latest artificial intelligence-based approaches attempting to predict PTSD and the numerous challenges they face before reaching clinical application.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature confirms that one third of relatives of ICU patients present significant PTSD-related symptoms at least 3  months after ICU discharge. A vast majority of risk factors associated with PTSD are non modifiable demographic characteristics, but some are modifiable and accessible to targeted interventions that aim to enhance the overall quality of families' experiences in the ICU. Recent research attempts to develop models to accurately predict family PTSD based on easily accessible data at the time of ICU discharge.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Relatives of ICU patients are at high risk of developing PTSD in the aftermath of an ICU stay. Accurate prediction of PTSD in relatives using artificial intelligence-based prediction systems could help stratify relatives at high risk, allowing timely management to mitigate its long-term impact. Beyond classification metrics benchmarks , further research is required to assess these algorithms in terms of clinical relevance, risk of bias and clinician adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"616-623"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ICU scoring systems: current perspectives and future directions. ICU评分系统:目前的观点和未来的方向。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001305
Jorge I F Salluh, Giulliana M Moralez, Alexander Tracy, Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato

Purpose of review: This review aims to summarize the recent publications and future perspectives on the use of ICU scoring systems mainly for the assessment of ICU performance, resource use and benchmarking. Additionally, we provide current limitations and future directions on the use of scoring systems.

Recent findings: Generalizability and precision remain major challenges to the use of ICU-score systems. Recent innovations in this field have been driven by the expansion of national and international critical care registries, alongside advancements in data science.Models developed using data from specific regions lack broader applicability. Simplified scoring systems have been proposed to address the urgent need for a global ICU predictive model. Scoring systems can facilitate research, outcome prediction, and healthcare quality comparisons across different settings. A global ICU score system would need minimal data collection requirements, but its use would be inherently limited by the trade-off between generalizability and precision. In parallel, the search for more precise models has led to recent advances. Artificial intelligence-based models have improved predictive abilities compared to traditional scores. Omics data integration and diverse variables and dimensions may interact to predict outcomes. Dynamic models can update such predictions. However, implementation challenges persist, including the need for validation across diverse settings and addressing issues such as transparency, reproducibility, and potential biases.

Summary: Traditionally, ICU scoring systems enable the assessment of patients' severity of illness and consequently the risk-adjusted evaluation of ICU performance and resource use. The expansion of national ICU registries has advanced their use internationally for quality assessment, quality improvement and benchmarking. Novel approaches and methodologies, including the use of machine learning and data science, are making progress in improving the scores performance and expanding their use beyond risk-adjusted mortality.

综述目的:本综述旨在总结ICU评分系统主要用于评估ICU绩效、资源利用和基准的最新出版物和未来展望。此外,我们提供当前的限制和未来的方向上使用评分系统。最近的发现:普遍性和准确性仍然是使用icu评分系统的主要挑战。最近这一领域的创新是由国家和国际重症监护登记处的扩大以及数据科学的进步推动的。利用特定地区的数据开发的模型缺乏更广泛的适用性。简化的评分系统已经提出,以解决迫切需要一个全球性的ICU预测模型。评分系统可以促进不同环境下的研究、结果预测和医疗质量比较。全球ICU评分系统需要的数据收集需求最小,但其使用本身就受到概括性和准确性之间权衡的限制。与此同时,寻找更精确的模型也带来了最近的进展。与传统分数相比,基于人工智能的模型提高了预测能力。组学数据整合和不同的变量和维度可能相互作用来预测结果。动态模型可以更新这样的预测。然而,实现方面的挑战仍然存在,包括需要在不同的设置中进行验证,并解决诸如透明度、可重复性和潜在偏差等问题。摘要:传统上,ICU评分系统能够评估患者的疾病严重程度,从而对ICU的表现和资源使用进行风险调整评估。国家重症监护病房登记处的扩大促进了其在国际上用于质量评估、质量改进和基准制定。新的方法和方法,包括机器学习和数据科学的使用,在提高评分性能和将其应用范围扩大到风险调整死亡率之外方面正在取得进展。
{"title":"ICU scoring systems: current perspectives and future directions.","authors":"Jorge I F Salluh, Giulliana M Moralez, Alexander Tracy, Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001305","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to summarize the recent publications and future perspectives on the use of ICU scoring systems mainly for the assessment of ICU performance, resource use and benchmarking. Additionally, we provide current limitations and future directions on the use of scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Generalizability and precision remain major challenges to the use of ICU-score systems. Recent innovations in this field have been driven by the expansion of national and international critical care registries, alongside advancements in data science.Models developed using data from specific regions lack broader applicability. Simplified scoring systems have been proposed to address the urgent need for a global ICU predictive model. Scoring systems can facilitate research, outcome prediction, and healthcare quality comparisons across different settings. A global ICU score system would need minimal data collection requirements, but its use would be inherently limited by the trade-off between generalizability and precision. In parallel, the search for more precise models has led to recent advances. Artificial intelligence-based models have improved predictive abilities compared to traditional scores. Omics data integration and diverse variables and dimensions may interact to predict outcomes. Dynamic models can update such predictions. However, implementation challenges persist, including the need for validation across diverse settings and addressing issues such as transparency, reproducibility, and potential biases.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Traditionally, ICU scoring systems enable the assessment of patients' severity of illness and consequently the risk-adjusted evaluation of ICU performance and resource use. The expansion of national ICU registries has advanced their use internationally for quality assessment, quality improvement and benchmarking. Novel approaches and methodologies, including the use of machine learning and data science, are making progress in improving the scores performance and expanding their use beyond risk-adjusted mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"608-615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ventilator-associated pneumonia: how long is long enough? 呼吸机相关性肺炎:多长时间够长?
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001298
Despoina Koulenti, Maria-Panagiota Almyroudi, Antonios Katsounas

Purpose of review: To provide an updated overview of optimal antibiotic duration in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), integrating guideline recommendations, clinical evidence, and expert opinion.

Recent findings: A randomized controlled trial, retrospective studies and meta-analyses support shorter (≤7-8-day) regimens for immunocompetent patients with VAP, reducing toxicity and, potentially, resistance development without compromising outcomes. However, while short-course regimens are increasingly supported, recent trials of newer agents often report durations >7 days, reflecting real-world challenges in resistant pathogens and trial design.

Summary: VAP remains the leading healthcare-associated infection in intensive care units (ICUs), related to worse outcomes and contributing substantially to antimicrobial use. Historically, prolonged antibiotic courses (≥10-14) were standard, particularly for cases involving multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) organisms. This review synthesizes current evidence supporting shorter course therapy for VAP (≤7-8 days), emphasizing the importance of clinical response and individualization. While guideline convergence on 7-8 days has grown, exceptions apply for specific pathogens (e.g., nonfermenters, MDR or XDR organisms), bacteremia, slow response, or structural lung disease. Biomarkers like procalcitonin may assist in select cases but lack VAP-specific validation. Regular reassessment is essential to balance efficacy with stewardship. Evidence gaps remain for immunocompromised patients and ultra-short regimens.

综述的目的:综合指南建议、临床证据和专家意见,提供呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)最佳抗生素持续时间的最新概述。最近的发现:一项随机对照试验、回顾性研究和荟萃分析支持对免疫功能正常的VAP患者采用更短(≤7-8天)的治疗方案,减少毒性和潜在的耐药性发展,而不影响结果。然而,尽管越来越多的人支持短期治疗方案,但最近对新药物的试验通常报告持续时间为70 - 70天,这反映了耐药病原体和试验设计的现实挑战。总结:VAP仍然是重症监护病房(icu)中主要的卫生保健相关感染,与较差的结果相关,并在很大程度上促进了抗菌药物的使用。从历史上看,延长抗生素疗程(≥10-14)是标准的,特别是涉及多药耐药(MDR)或广泛耐药(XDR)微生物的病例。本综述综合了目前支持VAP短期治疗(≤7-8天)的证据,强调了临床反应和个体化的重要性。虽然7-8天的指南趋同程度有所提高,但特殊病原体(如非发酵菌、耐多药或广泛耐药微生物)、菌血症、反应缓慢或结构性肺病除外。生物标志物如降钙素原可能有助于某些病例,但缺乏vap特异性验证。定期重新评估是平衡效能与管理的必要条件。免疫功能低下患者和超短疗程的证据差距仍然存在。
{"title":"Ventilator-associated pneumonia: how long is long enough?","authors":"Despoina Koulenti, Maria-Panagiota Almyroudi, Antonios Katsounas","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001298","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001298","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an updated overview of optimal antibiotic duration in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), integrating guideline recommendations, clinical evidence, and expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A randomized controlled trial, retrospective studies and meta-analyses support shorter (≤7-8-day) regimens for immunocompetent patients with VAP, reducing toxicity and, potentially, resistance development without compromising outcomes. However, while short-course regimens are increasingly supported, recent trials of newer agents often report durations >7 days, reflecting real-world challenges in resistant pathogens and trial design.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>VAP remains the leading healthcare-associated infection in intensive care units (ICUs), related to worse outcomes and contributing substantially to antimicrobial use. Historically, prolonged antibiotic courses (≥10-14) were standard, particularly for cases involving multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) organisms. This review synthesizes current evidence supporting shorter course therapy for VAP (≤7-8 days), emphasizing the importance of clinical response and individualization. While guideline convergence on 7-8 days has grown, exceptions apply for specific pathogens (e.g., nonfermenters, MDR or XDR organisms), bacteremia, slow response, or structural lung disease. Biomarkers like procalcitonin may assist in select cases but lack VAP-specific validation. Regular reassessment is essential to balance efficacy with stewardship. Evidence gaps remain for immunocompromised patients and ultra-short regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"520-528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimal duration of antifungal therapy in candidemia. 念珠菌病抗真菌治疗的最佳持续时间。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001308
Claudia Bartalucci, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti

Purpose of review: In candidemia, the standard 14-day antifungal treatment after blood culture clearance has been long accepted, despite being based on limited and outdated evidence. This review discusses the rationale for re-evaluating treatment duration, in the context of growing interest in optimizing antifungal use.

Recent findings: A small number of retrospective studies have explored shorter treatment courses in uncomplicated candidemia, suggesting similar outcomes in terms of mortality and recurrence compared to the traditional 14-day regimen. However, these data are limited and potentially biased, with no randomized controlled trials available to provide definitive guidance. Moreover, no validated clinical, microbiological, or biomarker-based algorithms currently exist to inform individualized treatment duration in daily practice.

Summary: The historical 14-day rule for candidemia treatment is increasingly challenged by recent literature, yet the available evidence remains scarce and methodologically limited. A well designed randomized controlled trial is urgently needed to establish the efficacy and safety of shorter antifungal courses. These data would be essential to inform clinical decisions and support antifungal stewardship by minimizing unnecessary treatments, lowering costs, limiting resistance, and improving patient outcomes.

综述目的:在念珠菌中,尽管基于有限和过时的证据,但血液培养清除后标准的14天抗真菌治疗已被长期接受。这篇综述讨论了重新评估治疗时间的基本原理,在优化抗真菌药物使用的背景下。近期发现:少数回顾性研究探索了简单念珠菌的较短治疗疗程,与传统的14天治疗方案相比,在死亡率和复发率方面的结果相似。然而,这些数据是有限的,并且可能存在偏差,没有随机对照试验可以提供明确的指导。此外,目前还没有经过验证的临床、微生物学或基于生物标志物的算法来告知日常实践中个性化治疗的持续时间。摘要:念珠菌治疗的历史14天规则越来越受到近期文献的挑战,但现有证据仍然很少,方法上也有限。迫切需要一项设计良好的随机对照试验来确定短期抗真菌疗程的有效性和安全性。这些数据对于通过减少不必要的治疗、降低成本、限制耐药性和改善患者预后来告知临床决策和支持抗真菌管理至关重要。
{"title":"Optimal duration of antifungal therapy in candidemia.","authors":"Claudia Bartalucci, Antonio Vena, Matteo Bassetti","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001308","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In candidemia, the standard 14-day antifungal treatment after blood culture clearance has been long accepted, despite being based on limited and outdated evidence. This review discusses the rationale for re-evaluating treatment duration, in the context of growing interest in optimizing antifungal use.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A small number of retrospective studies have explored shorter treatment courses in uncomplicated candidemia, suggesting similar outcomes in terms of mortality and recurrence compared to the traditional 14-day regimen. However, these data are limited and potentially biased, with no randomized controlled trials available to provide definitive guidance. Moreover, no validated clinical, microbiological, or biomarker-based algorithms currently exist to inform individualized treatment duration in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The historical 14-day rule for candidemia treatment is increasingly challenged by recent literature, yet the available evidence remains scarce and methodologically limited. A well designed randomized controlled trial is urgently needed to establish the efficacy and safety of shorter antifungal courses. These data would be essential to inform clinical decisions and support antifungal stewardship by minimizing unnecessary treatments, lowering costs, limiting resistance, and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":"31 5","pages":"481-487"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144999796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of MDR/XDR severe infections in the critically ill. 对危重病人中耐多药/广泛耐药严重感染的管理。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001307
Luca Mezzadri, Ya-Ting Chang, David L Paterson

Purpose of review: This review aims to summarize current recommendations for the management of serious infections, such as bloodstream infections (BSIs) and ventilator-associated pneumonia, caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens, focusing on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and emerging treatment options.

Recent findings: Vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin represent the main therapeutic options for the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections; among newer agents, ceftobiprole has recently gained approval for BSI treatment. For vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium BSIs, linezolid and daptomycin remain commonly employed despite the lack of comparative RCTs guiding treatment decisions. The management of MDR/XDR Gram-negative infections is challenging, owing to sparse clinical trials for robust guidance and rapid emergence of diverse resistance mechanisms. New beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations remain the cornerstone of treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol and the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam represent the current last-resort options for metallo-β-lactamase producers. For carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, sulbactam-durlobactam has demonstrated at least comparable activity compared to colistin but is unavailable in most countries.

Summary: Optimal management of serious infections by MDR/XDR pathogens requires up-to-date knowledge of evolving treatment options and resistance mechanisms. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to guide evidence-based therapy.

综述目的:本综述旨在总结目前关于由多药耐药(MDR)和广泛耐药(XDR)病原体引起的严重感染(如血流感染(bsi)和呼吸机相关肺炎)管理的建议,重点关注随机对照试验(rct)的证据和新兴的治疗方案。最新发现:万古霉素、利奈唑胺和达托霉素是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的主要治疗选择;在较新的药物中,ceftobiprole最近被批准用于BSI治疗。对于耐万古霉素的屎肠球菌bsi,尽管缺乏指导治疗决策的比较随机对照试验,但利奈唑胺和达托霉素仍然被普遍使用。耐多药/广泛耐药革兰氏阴性感染的管理是具有挑战性的,因为缺乏强有力指导的临床试验,而且多种耐药机制迅速出现。新的β -内酰胺/ β -内酰胺酶抑制剂组合仍然是耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌和耐碳青霉烯铜绿假单胞菌治疗的基石。头孢地罗和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦加阿曲南的组合是目前金属β-内酰胺酶生产商的最后选择。对于耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌,舒巴坦-杜罗巴坦已证明至少与粘菌素具有相当的活性,但在大多数国家无法获得。摘要:对耐多药/广泛耐药病原体严重感染的最佳管理需要对不断发展的治疗方案和耐药机制有最新的了解。需要进一步的高质量临床试验来指导循证治疗。
{"title":"Management of MDR/XDR severe infections in the critically ill.","authors":"Luca Mezzadri, Ya-Ting Chang, David L Paterson","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001307","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to summarize current recommendations for the management of serious infections, such as bloodstream infections (BSIs) and ventilator-associated pneumonia, caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens, focusing on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and emerging treatment options.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin represent the main therapeutic options for the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections; among newer agents, ceftobiprole has recently gained approval for BSI treatment. For vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium BSIs, linezolid and daptomycin remain commonly employed despite the lack of comparative RCTs guiding treatment decisions. The management of MDR/XDR Gram-negative infections is challenging, owing to sparse clinical trials for robust guidance and rapid emergence of diverse resistance mechanisms. New beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations remain the cornerstone of treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol and the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam represent the current last-resort options for metallo-β-lactamase producers. For carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, sulbactam-durlobactam has demonstrated at least comparable activity compared to colistin but is unavailable in most countries.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Optimal management of serious infections by MDR/XDR pathogens requires up-to-date knowledge of evolving treatment options and resistance mechanisms. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to guide evidence-based therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":"31 5","pages":"488-496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144999825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1