Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity最新文献

Purpose of review: Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) can develop after withdrawing exposure to supraphysiological levels of endogenous or exogenous glucocorticoids due to an established physical dependence. It is characterised by symptoms similar to adrenal insufficiency but needs to be regarded as a separate entity. GWS is often under-recognised in clinical practice and affected patients can experience significant impairment in their quality of life.

Recent findings: A cornerstone in GWS management is adequate patient education and reassurance that symptoms are expected and typically temporary. Patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome need to be aware that psychopathology may persist into the postoperative period. GWS is more likely to develop in severe Cushing's syndrome and in patients with very low levels of cortisol after surgery. Postoperatively, glucocorticoid replacement should be initiated and tapered in an individualised approach but there is currently no consensus on the best tapering strategy. If symptoms of GWS develop, glucocorticoid replacement ought to be temporarily increased to the previous, well tolerated dose. No randomised studies have thus far compared regimens for withdrawing glucocorticoids after treatment for anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive causes to determine the best and safest tapering strategy. One open-label, single-arm trial in patients with asthma has recently proposed a personalised glucocorticoid tapering regimen which included the systematic assessment of adrenal function.

Summary: Awareness of GWS by treating physicians and patient education are essential. Evidence on optimal GWS management after Cushing's syndrome treatment is scarce, but new data are emerging for tapering after long-term glucocorticoid treatment.

Purpose of review: Review the literature on the surgical management of adrenal diseases, highlighting the various surgical approaches and their respective pros and cons.

Recent findings: Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is commonly used for small and benign adrenal tumors, whereas open adrenalectomy is preferred for larger tumors and primary adrenal malignancy. Although minimally invasive adrenalectomy results in shorter recovery and fewer complications compared with open, the latter offers better oncologic outcomes in the setting of primary adrenal malignancy. Adrenalectomy is performed transabdominally or retroperitoneoscopically, both yielding equivalent results and recovery. Traditional laparoscopic or robotic equipment can be utilized for either minimally invasive approach. Subtotal adrenalectomy may be appropriate for patients with genetically associated pheochromocytoma to preserve cortical function and reduce the risk of adrenal insufficiency. However, the potential benefits of sparing adrenal function must be weighed against the risk of recurrence.

Summary: Adrenalectomy is becoming increasingly common worldwide. For benign and small adrenal tumors, minimally invasive adrenalectomy is generally considered the standard approach, while open adrenalectomy is preferred for primary adrenal malignancy and larger tumors. Subtotal adrenalectomy may be appropriate for patients with bilateral adrenal pheochromocytoma, as it can reduce the need for lifelong glucocorticoid dependency.

Purpose of review: To summarize recent studies analyzing reclassification of estimated risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) by inclusion of remnant cholesterol (= cholesterol content in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins) in primary and secondary prevention settings.

Recent findings: For individuals in a primary prevention setting with remnant cholesterol levels at least 95th percentile (≥1.6 mmol/l, 61 mg/dl), 23% of MI and 21% of IHD events developed later were reclassified correctly from below to above 5% for 10-year occurrence when remnant cholesterol levels were added to models based on conventional risk factors, whereas no events were reclassified incorrectly. Overall improved reclassification of MI was also observed for remnant cholesterol levels as low as at least 50th percentile (≥0.6 mmol/l, 25 mg/dl); however, the addition of remnant cholesterol over the entire concentration range yielded insignificant improvements of NRI for MI but slightly improved reclassification of NRI for IHD. In a secondary prevention setting, addition of remnant cholesterol over the entire concentration range to a conventional risk model improved reclassification.

Summary: Elevated remnant cholesterol levels considerably improves reclassification of individuals who later develop MI and IHD, in primary as well as in secondary prevention settings.

Purpose of review: Fatty liver disease is increasingly common worldwide and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Recent findings: This review describes the cardiovascular outcomes, clinical assessment and management as well as the impact of emerging drug treatment on CVD risk.

Summary: Patients with fatty liver require CVD risk assessment including consideration of statin therapy. Emerging therapeutic drugs for fatty liver may have both adverse and beneficial effects on CVD risk.

Purpose of review: Interest in the use of calorie restriction with low-carbohydrate diets for patients with type 1 diabetes appears to be increasing despite physicians' discomfort about its longer term outcomes. A divergence in opinion regarding the balance of benefits and safety may lead to patient disengagement from conventional medical supervision. This review describes the current evidence regarding the benefits and risks of these diets and suggests a way forward to addressing this potential misalignment between the aims of patients and their physicians.

Recent findings: Benefits on glycaemia are observed in many studies, with improved HbA1c, time within target range and reduced glycaemic variability. A characteristic lipid profile with high LDL cholesterol is observed in many patients, but association with future cardiovascular events is undefined. A negative impact on growth has been identified in the paediatric population, and impact on mental health and disordered eating is of theoretical concern, without measurement in clinical studies.

Summary: Patients will continue to trial and, with immediate glycaemic benefits, potentially remain on lower carbohydrate diets irrespective of concern by treating physicians about potential longer term risks. A supportive multidisciplinary approach with greater nutritional supervision and more research is required, to allow these patients to achieve their desired glycaemic outcomes without compromising longer term safety.

Purpose of review: Populations with greater fatty fish intake have lower risk of coronary heart disease. However, trials testing omega-3 fatty acids (FA) on cardiovascular outcomes have yielded inconsistent results. In this review, we summarize the major cardiovascular trials examining omega-3 FA supplementation, and compare differences with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) alone vs. docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) combined with EPA.

Recent findings: The JELIS and REDUCE-IT trials both demonstrated significant reduction in cardiovascular events with high dose EPA in the form of icosapent ethyl (IPE), with a similar trend seen in the RESPECT-EPA trial. In contrast, the ASCEND, VITAL, STRENGTH, and OMEMI trials examining EPA+DPA combinations failed to demonstrate benefit. Beyond the difference in omega-3 FA formulations (IPE vs. omega-3 carboxylic acid), other differences between REDUCE-IT and STRENGTH include the achieved EPA levels, differing properties that EPA and DHA have on membrane stabilization, and the comparator oils tested in the trials.

Summary: The totality of evidence suggests EPA alone, administered in a highly-purified, high-dose form, improves cardiovascular outcomes among patients with elevated triglycerides at high cardiovascular risk, but EPA and DHA together does not. Current guidelines endorse the use of IPE in statin-treated patients at high cardiovascular risk who have triglycerides >135 mg/dl.

Purpose of review: Examine Setmelanotide use in patients with rare genetic variants that disrupt the melanocortin pathway.

Recent findings: Between February 2017 and September 2018, 10 participants with pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC)/ proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 (PCSK1) deficiency and 11 participants with leptin receptor (LEPR) deficiency were enrolled in open-label, phase 3 trials at 10 centers in the United States and internationally to assess the efficacy and safety of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) agonist Setmelanotide. 80% of POMC participants and 45% of LEPR participants achieved at least 10% weight loss at 1 year. Significant changes in hunger scores were seen for both cohorts as well. Setmelanotide was well tolerated with injection site reactions and hyperpigmentation being the most common adverse events reported. As a result, Setmelanotide was approved by the U.S. FDA in 2020 for chronic weight management in adult and pediatric patients ≥6 years of age with POMC, LEPR, or PCSK1 deficiency. In 2022, its approval was extended to include patients with Bardet-Biedel syndrome (BBS) after phase 3 trial data showed that, on average, Setmelanotide treatment resulted in a BMI loss of 7.9% for the 44 BBS participants.

Summary: Rare genetic variants such as POMC, LEPR, and PCSK1 deficiency disrupt MC4R pathway signaling, resulting in severe early-onset obesity, hyperphagia, and increased risk for metabolic co-morbidities. Patients with BBS also demonstrate severe early-onset obesity and hyperphagia, due in part to defective MC4R signaling. Setmelanotide has shown promising benefits in improving satiety scores and weight-related outcomes in patients with these early-life genetic obesity conditions, although longer-term studies are needed.

Purpose of review: Elevated Lp(a) level is an important causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), principally coronary artery disease. Selective testing for Lp(a) is highly recommended in patients at intermediate and high risk for ASCVD. Lp(a) levels are predominantly genetically determined, and this has implications for cascade testing.

Recent findings: Recent studies show that cascade testing is effective in identifying elevated Lp(a) in close relatives of probands with high Lp(a). Apart from selective testing and cascade testing as detection strategies, some recent guidelines recommend testing of Lp(a) in all adults at least once in their lifetime and various implementation strategies have been suggested.

Summary: Hyper-Lp(a) is an important global health problem that can be easily detected. Hyper-Lp(a) meets all the criteria for universal screening except that there is not yet supportive evidence from clinical interventional trials showing a reduction of ASCVD events. The cost-effectiveness of the various detection and implementation strategies need to be further evaluated.