Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-05-07DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000944
Trisha Thomas, Jayashree Dasgupta
Purpose of review: India is facing a significant increase in the aging population who are at risk for dementia. This review evaluates recent literature on community-based care, focusing on caregiver experiences, challenges and policy initiatives.
Recent findings: Dementia care in India is traditionally provided by family members who take on the role of caregivers. Studies on caregiver experiences have reflected high caregiving burden and related impact on their mental health. During the pandemic, caregivers experienced several unprecedented challenges in providing care, emphasizing the need for more research on community-based dementia care across the country. Telehealth and online caregiver training were identified as viable alternatives to support community dementia care. However, it may not be a feasible mode of delivery suitable across the Indian context, underscoring the need for culturally relevant and acceptable interventions. India is currently undertaking concerted policy efforts for dementia care through multiple initiatives like the National Program for Healthcare of the Elderly, the Mental Healthcare Act, and initiatives like the Atal Vayo Abhyuday Yojna. These initiatives aim to address the healthcare requirements of the elderly; nevertheless, a comprehensive evaluation of their impact is yet to be discerned.
Summary: There is a need for comprehensive research, to inform evidence-based policy and improve dementia care systems in India. Addressing gaps in existing dementia care capacities and healthcare initiatives, along with tailoring interventions to India's diverse contexts are critical for effective community care for dementia.
{"title":"A narrative review of community-based dementia care in India: experiences, challenges, and policy initiatives.","authors":"Trisha Thomas, Jayashree Dasgupta","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000944","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000944","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>India is facing a significant increase in the aging population who are at risk for dementia. This review evaluates recent literature on community-based care, focusing on caregiver experiences, challenges and policy initiatives.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Dementia care in India is traditionally provided by family members who take on the role of caregivers. Studies on caregiver experiences have reflected high caregiving burden and related impact on their mental health. During the pandemic, caregivers experienced several unprecedented challenges in providing care, emphasizing the need for more research on community-based dementia care across the country. Telehealth and online caregiver training were identified as viable alternatives to support community dementia care. However, it may not be a feasible mode of delivery suitable across the Indian context, underscoring the need for culturally relevant and acceptable interventions. India is currently undertaking concerted policy efforts for dementia care through multiple initiatives like the National Program for Healthcare of the Elderly, the Mental Healthcare Act, and initiatives like the Atal Vayo Abhyuday Yojna. These initiatives aim to address the healthcare requirements of the elderly; nevertheless, a comprehensive evaluation of their impact is yet to be discerned.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a need for comprehensive research, to inform evidence-based policy and improve dementia care systems in India. Addressing gaps in existing dementia care capacities and healthcare initiatives, along with tailoring interventions to India's diverse contexts are critical for effective community care for dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"370-375"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140897544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-24DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000957
Urska Arnautovska, Alyssa Milton, Mike Trott, Rebecca Soole, Dan Siskind
Purpose of review: Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SDD) are characterized by a complex array of psychosis symptoms, and typically require ongoing and long-term support, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological management. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have been suggested as a novel therapeutic approach to enable low-cost, scalable improvements in quality of care for adults living with SSD. However, the types and role of human involvement and support within DMHIs is currently unknown.
Recent findings: Several recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the potential efficacy of DMHIs for people with SSD, with scant yet emerging systematic evidence on the effects of human support within DMHIs on mental health outcomes. Further, several recent individual studies examined the efficacy of DMHIs with human support among people with SSD and provided valuable insights into the potential key elements of such support on outcomes relevant to this population.
Summary: The current critical review provides the first narrative synthesis of available evidence to guide clinicians and intervention develops in designing DMHIs with adequate human support that may enhance long-term outcomes of people living with SSD.
{"title":"The role of human involvement and support in digital mental health interventions for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a critical review.","authors":"Urska Arnautovska, Alyssa Milton, Mike Trott, Rebecca Soole, Dan Siskind","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000957","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SDD) are characterized by a complex array of psychosis symptoms, and typically require ongoing and long-term support, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological management. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have been suggested as a novel therapeutic approach to enable low-cost, scalable improvements in quality of care for adults living with SSD. However, the types and role of human involvement and support within DMHIs is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the potential efficacy of DMHIs for people with SSD, with scant yet emerging systematic evidence on the effects of human support within DMHIs on mental health outcomes. Further, several recent individual studies examined the efficacy of DMHIs with human support among people with SSD and provided valuable insights into the potential key elements of such support on outcomes relevant to this population.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The current critical review provides the first narrative synthesis of available evidence to guide clinicians and intervention develops in designing DMHIs with adequate human support that may enhance long-term outcomes of people living with SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"356-362"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-10DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000953
Shalika Arniotis-Streat, Anthony Fonte, Hisham Ziauddeen
Purpose of review: Psychotropic drug related weight gain is a common side-effect of significant concern to both clinicians and patients. Recent studies and treatment guidelines strongly support taking preventive and early treatment approaches to psychotropic drug-related weight gain (PDWG). Arguably the main pathway that PDWG occurs is via changes in eating behaviour leading to increased caloric intake.
Recent findings: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have provided good data on the nature and prevalence of alterations in eating behaviour with psychotropic treatment including increased hunger, night eating and binge eating. These changes are unsurprisingly more prominent with agents like olanzapine and clozapine that have high propensity to cause weight gain.
Summary: Altered eating behaviour can serve as an earlier measure of the risk of weight gain and can be examined easily in clinical practice. Detecting these changes can enable earlier action in terms of switching treatments and starting pharmacological and nonpharmacological preventive strategies.
{"title":"Psychotropic drugs, eating behaviour and weight gain.","authors":"Shalika Arniotis-Streat, Anthony Fonte, Hisham Ziauddeen","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000953","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000953","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Psychotropic drug related weight gain is a common side-effect of significant concern to both clinicians and patients. Recent studies and treatment guidelines strongly support taking preventive and early treatment approaches to psychotropic drug-related weight gain (PDWG). Arguably the main pathway that PDWG occurs is via changes in eating behaviour leading to increased caloric intake.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have provided good data on the nature and prevalence of alterations in eating behaviour with psychotropic treatment including increased hunger, night eating and binge eating. These changes are unsurprisingly more prominent with agents like olanzapine and clozapine that have high propensity to cause weight gain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Altered eating behaviour can serve as an earlier measure of the risk of weight gain and can be examined easily in clinical practice. Detecting these changes can enable earlier action in terms of switching treatments and starting pharmacological and nonpharmacological preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"331-336"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-13DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000954
Ana Ganho-Ávila, Mónica Sobral, Mijke Lambregtse-van den Berg
Purpose of review: To present the latest data on the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in peripartum depression (PPD), complemented by notes emerging from our clinical and research experience.
Recent findings: TMS and tDCS show promising results to manage mild to moderate depressive symptoms in the peripartum period. Evidence of TMS efficacy during pregnancy and the postpartum comes from two small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with encouraging but still inconsistent results. Evidence of tDCS efficacy during pregnancy comes from one small RCT and in the postpartum the first RCT is just now being conducted and results are highly expected. The safety profile (with transient mild adverse effect to women and no known risk to the foetus/newborn) and acceptability by women seems overall good. However, the perspectives from health professionals and managers are unclear.
Summary: Whereas TMS accelerated protocols (e.g., more than one session/day) and shorter sessions (e.g., theta burst stimulation) could address the need for fast results in PPD, home-based tDCS systems could address accessibility issues. Currently, the evidence on the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in PPD is limited warranting further research to support stronger evidence-based clinical guidelines.
{"title":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in reducing depressive symptoms during the peripartum period.","authors":"Ana Ganho-Ávila, Mónica Sobral, Mijke Lambregtse-van den Berg","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000954","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To present the latest data on the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in peripartum depression (PPD), complemented by notes emerging from our clinical and research experience.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>TMS and tDCS show promising results to manage mild to moderate depressive symptoms in the peripartum period. Evidence of TMS efficacy during pregnancy and the postpartum comes from two small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with encouraging but still inconsistent results. Evidence of tDCS efficacy during pregnancy comes from one small RCT and in the postpartum the first RCT is just now being conducted and results are highly expected. The safety profile (with transient mild adverse effect to women and no known risk to the foetus/newborn) and acceptability by women seems overall good. However, the perspectives from health professionals and managers are unclear.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Whereas TMS accelerated protocols (e.g., more than one session/day) and shorter sessions (e.g., theta burst stimulation) could address the need for fast results in PPD, home-based tDCS systems could address accessibility issues. Currently, the evidence on the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in PPD is limited warranting further research to support stronger evidence-based clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"337-349"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-15DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000958
Žarko Bajić, Sandra Vuk-Pisk, Igor Filipčić, Ivona Šimunović Filipčić
Purpose of review: Although cancer incidence is similar between individuals with severe mental disorders (SMD) and the general population (GP), survival rates are lower, particularly in those with schizophrenia. While the scientific and medical communities acknowledge sex differences in cancer mechanisms, including risk factors and cancer types, less is known about sex and gender disparities in incidence, mortality, and care pathways among those with SMD. This review aims to explore these differences in cancer among individuals with SMD.
Recent findings: Current evidence on sex and gender differences in cancer care for SMD is limited. It is unclear how these factors affect cancer incidence and mortality in the SMD population, and if they correspond to those in the GP. The literature frequently omits detailed information on sex-based differences in SMD-related cancer rates, complicating conclusive analysis. Moreover, people with SMD experience significant challenges in accessing cancer screenings compared to the GP, and findings on sex and gender disparities in this context remain inconclusive.
Summary: This review emphasizes that while significant sex and gender-based differences in cancer mechanisms, incidence, and survival exist within the GP, they have not been fully integrated into clinical practice. It underscores the need of addressing these differences in cancer incidence, outcomes, mortality, and care pathways to enhance treatment for individuals with SMD.
{"title":"Sex and gender differences in cancer in individuals with severe mental disorders.","authors":"Žarko Bajić, Sandra Vuk-Pisk, Igor Filipčić, Ivona Šimunović Filipčić","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000958","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000958","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although cancer incidence is similar between individuals with severe mental disorders (SMD) and the general population (GP), survival rates are lower, particularly in those with schizophrenia. While the scientific and medical communities acknowledge sex differences in cancer mechanisms, including risk factors and cancer types, less is known about sex and gender disparities in incidence, mortality, and care pathways among those with SMD. This review aims to explore these differences in cancer among individuals with SMD.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current evidence on sex and gender differences in cancer care for SMD is limited. It is unclear how these factors affect cancer incidence and mortality in the SMD population, and if they correspond to those in the GP. The literature frequently omits detailed information on sex-based differences in SMD-related cancer rates, complicating conclusive analysis. Moreover, people with SMD experience significant challenges in accessing cancer screenings compared to the GP, and findings on sex and gender disparities in this context remain inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review emphasizes that while significant sex and gender-based differences in cancer mechanisms, incidence, and survival exist within the GP, they have not been fully integrated into clinical practice. It underscores the need of addressing these differences in cancer incidence, outcomes, mortality, and care pathways to enhance treatment for individuals with SMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"350-355"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141619541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000951
Claire Surr, Laura Ashley
Purpose of review: This narrative review examines recent research on end of life (EOL) care for people with dementia and comorbid cancer, highlighting the complexity and challenge of providing effective EOL care for this group and areas of interest for future research.
Recent findings: People with cancer and dementia and their family/supporters have more complex care and support needs at EOL that are less well met than those of older adults with cancer alone, including questionable use of aggressive EOL care interventions, poorer access to specialist palliative care teams and poor pain management. Those diagnosed with dementia at the same time as, or after their cancer diagnosis, are at greater risk of aggressive EOL care and EOL cancer treatment and care plans that are not able to meet their care needs as dementia progresses.
Summary: There is a lack of research on EOL care for people with cancer and dementia. There is little understanding of what good care for this population looks like and if and how EOL care can best meet the needs of people with cancer and dementia or their carers/supporters. More research is needed to inform improved care for this population.
{"title":"End of life care for people with dementia and comorbid cancer: recent studies and research gaps.","authors":"Claire Surr, Laura Ashley","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000951","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000951","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review examines recent research on end of life (EOL) care for people with dementia and comorbid cancer, highlighting the complexity and challenge of providing effective EOL care for this group and areas of interest for future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>People with cancer and dementia and their family/supporters have more complex care and support needs at EOL that are less well met than those of older adults with cancer alone, including questionable use of aggressive EOL care interventions, poorer access to specialist palliative care teams and poor pain management. Those diagnosed with dementia at the same time as, or after their cancer diagnosis, are at greater risk of aggressive EOL care and EOL cancer treatment and care plans that are not able to meet their care needs as dementia progresses.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a lack of research on EOL care for people with cancer and dementia. There is little understanding of what good care for this population looks like and if and how EOL care can best meet the needs of people with cancer and dementia or their carers/supporters. More research is needed to inform improved care for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"376-380"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141260961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-07DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000952
Mike Trott, Urska Arnautovska, Dan Siskind
Purpose of review: People with schizophrenia experience three to five times higher prevalence of diabetes and obesity than the general population, contributing to a 20-year reduced lifespan. The impacts of weight gain extend beyond physical health, affecting people's self-esteem, quality of life, and triggering treatment nonadherence, leading to relapse and deteriorations in health. Clinical guidelines recommend patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain are treated with cognitive behaviour therapy and lifestyle changes; however, effective treatments for obesity in schizophrenia are critically lacking. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-RAs) have shown large effects in weight loss in the general population; however, effects are less clear in people with schizophrenia. This review aims to assess the clinical trials that have been completed, are in progress, and directions for future trials.
Recent findings: To date, six clinical trials have been completed, four of which have published their findings. Three further trials are currently in progress.
Summary: Results from completed trials suggest that GLP-1RAs decrease weight in people with schizophrenia, however effect sizes are mostly smaller than studies based on the general population. Future trials could focus on dual or triple agonist agents, and/or explore the effects of GLP-1 s at antipsychotic medication commencement, to potentially prevent antipsychotic weight gain.
{"title":"GLP-1 receptor agonists and weight loss in schizophrenia - past, present, and future.","authors":"Mike Trott, Urska Arnautovska, Dan Siskind","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000952","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>People with schizophrenia experience three to five times higher prevalence of diabetes and obesity than the general population, contributing to a 20-year reduced lifespan. The impacts of weight gain extend beyond physical health, affecting people's self-esteem, quality of life, and triggering treatment nonadherence, leading to relapse and deteriorations in health. Clinical guidelines recommend patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain are treated with cognitive behaviour therapy and lifestyle changes; however, effective treatments for obesity in schizophrenia are critically lacking. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-RAs) have shown large effects in weight loss in the general population; however, effects are less clear in people with schizophrenia. This review aims to assess the clinical trials that have been completed, are in progress, and directions for future trials.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>To date, six clinical trials have been completed, four of which have published their findings. Three further trials are currently in progress.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Results from completed trials suggest that GLP-1RAs decrease weight in people with schizophrenia, however effect sizes are mostly smaller than studies based on the general population. Future trials could focus on dual or triple agonist agents, and/or explore the effects of GLP-1 s at antipsychotic medication commencement, to potentially prevent antipsychotic weight gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"363-369"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141283284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000968
Paul M G Emmelkamp, Katharina Meyerbröker
Purpose of review: To provide an update of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and recent clinical outcome studies for personality disorder (PD) in order to investigate the state of the art of the evidence of psychotherapy for personality disorders.
Recent findings: Few outcome studies in patients with Cluster A and Cluster C PD have been conducted, which limits the conclusions which can be drawn. Most recently published research has been conducted with borderline PD. There is limited evidence that dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mentalization based therapy and schema therapy are more effective than treatment as usual. There is no convincing evidence that long and intensive therapy is more effective than short and less intensive therapy. Drop-out is rather high for patients with borderline PD. Group therapy results in more drop-outs than individual therapy.
Summary: There is a clear need of studies evaluating whether psychotherapies developed for PDs are more effective than CBT for patients with Cluster C PD. Given that studies with patients with Cluster B PD suggest that longer treatment of DBT and mentalization-based treatment is not more effective than shorter treatment this needs to be studied with other evidence-based therapies as well. Serious efforts are needed to evaluate therapies for patients with Cluster A PDs.
综述目的:提供有关人格障碍(PD)的系统综述、荟萃分析和最新临床结果研究的最新情况,以调查人格障碍心理治疗证据的最新进展:针对 A 群和 C 群人格障碍患者的疗效研究很少,这限制了可得出的结论。最近发表的大多数研究都是针对边缘型人格障碍的。有有限的证据表明,辩证行为疗法(DBT)、心智化疗法和模式疗法比常规治疗更有效。没有令人信服的证据表明长期强化治疗比短期和低强度治疗更有效。边缘型帕金森病患者的辍学率相当高。总结:对于C群型帕金森病患者而言,显然有必要开展研究,评估针对帕金森病开发的心理疗法是否比CBT更有效。鉴于对B群型帕金森病患者的研究表明,DBT和基于精神化的较长时间治疗并不比较短时间治疗更有效,因此还需要对其他循证疗法进行研究。我们需要认真努力,评估针对 A 群型帕金森病患者的疗法。
{"title":"Psychotherapies for the treatment of personality disorders: the state of the art.","authors":"Paul M G Emmelkamp, Katharina Meyerbröker","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000968","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000968","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide an update of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and recent clinical outcome studies for personality disorder (PD) in order to investigate the state of the art of the evidence of psychotherapy for personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Few outcome studies in patients with Cluster A and Cluster C PD have been conducted, which limits the conclusions which can be drawn. Most recently published research has been conducted with borderline PD. There is limited evidence that dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mentalization based therapy and schema therapy are more effective than treatment as usual. There is no convincing evidence that long and intensive therapy is more effective than short and less intensive therapy. Drop-out is rather high for patients with borderline PD. Group therapy results in more drop-outs than individual therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a clear need of studies evaluating whether psychotherapies developed for PDs are more effective than CBT for patients with Cluster C PD. Given that studies with patients with Cluster B PD suggest that longer treatment of DBT and mentalization-based treatment is not more effective than shorter treatment this needs to be studied with other evidence-based therapies as well. Serious efforts are needed to evaluate therapies for patients with Cluster A PDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-05DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000959
Ştefania Crişan, Diana Nechita
Purpose of review: Theoretical models of personality disorders (PDs) highlight the role of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in the development and maintenance of personality pathology. This review presents recent studies on the associations between childhood adversity and PDs, while discussing mechanisms and factors that impact these relationships.
Recent findings: Studies point to small to moderate associations between childhood adversity and cluster A, cluster B and cluster C PDs, and some research suggests that childhood adversity could be a predictor for the onset and development of personality pathology. Most research focuses on borderline PD, while research on other PDs is limited. Some mechanisms that explain these associations have been proposed, with the literature investigating emotion dysregulation, dissociation, avoidance or psychosocial dysfunction as mediators.
Summary: The consistent associations between ACEs and PDs seems to point that childhood adversity could be a transdiagnostic risk factor for PDs, but research warrants further prospective investigations for causal conclusions, and calls for future research to investigate potential mediators and moderators more thoroughly.
{"title":"Personality disorders and their association with adverse childhood events.","authors":"Ştefania Crişan, Diana Nechita","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000959","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Theoretical models of personality disorders (PDs) highlight the role of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in the development and maintenance of personality pathology. This review presents recent studies on the associations between childhood adversity and PDs, while discussing mechanisms and factors that impact these relationships.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Studies point to small to moderate associations between childhood adversity and cluster A, cluster B and cluster C PDs, and some research suggests that childhood adversity could be a predictor for the onset and development of personality pathology. Most research focuses on borderline PD, while research on other PDs is limited. Some mechanisms that explain these associations have been proposed, with the literature investigating emotion dysregulation, dissociation, avoidance or psychosocial dysfunction as mediators.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The consistent associations between ACEs and PDs seems to point that childhood adversity could be a transdiagnostic risk factor for PDs, but research warrants further prospective investigations for causal conclusions, and calls for future research to investigate potential mediators and moderators more thoroughly.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-05-06DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000949
John B Saunders, Gary Chan, Janni Leung, Daniel Stjepanović, Jason P Connor
Purpose of review: This review describes the diagnoses related to problem gaming that are included in ICD-11, published by the WHO in 2022. It summarizes the recent literature on the prevalence of Gaming Disorder, its structure, antecedents and comorbidities, and explores whether the range of diagnoses currently available adequately covers the range of experiences seen with problem gaming.
Recent findings: Overall, between 3 and 6% of the population worldwide are reported to have a gaming disorder as defined by ICD-11 or DSM-5. However, most studies are constrained by methodological issues such as nonrepresentative samples and the use of brief questionnaires to determine prevalence. ICD-11 Gaming Disorder is a psychometrically sound diagnosis. There is no diagnosis that currently captures the experience of harm from gaming, where the requirements for the diagnosis of Gaming Disorder are not reached.
Summary: There is evidence in support of the proposed new entity of 'Harmful Gaming', which encompasses mental and physical harm/impairment due to a repeated pattern of gaming, but where requirements for the diagnosis of Gaming Disorder are not met. Such a diagnosis would complete the spectrum of diagnoses available for problem or unhealthy gaming, similar to those for unhealthy substance use, and would provide a framework for a public health approach to reducing the overall harm from unhealthy gaming.
{"title":"The nature and characteristics of problem gaming, with a focus on ICD-11 diagnoses.","authors":"John B Saunders, Gary Chan, Janni Leung, Daniel Stjepanović, Jason P Connor","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000949","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000949","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review describes the diagnoses related to problem gaming that are included in ICD-11, published by the WHO in 2022. It summarizes the recent literature on the prevalence of Gaming Disorder, its structure, antecedents and comorbidities, and explores whether the range of diagnoses currently available adequately covers the range of experiences seen with problem gaming.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Overall, between 3 and 6% of the population worldwide are reported to have a gaming disorder as defined by ICD-11 or DSM-5. However, most studies are constrained by methodological issues such as nonrepresentative samples and the use of brief questionnaires to determine prevalence. ICD-11 Gaming Disorder is a psychometrically sound diagnosis. There is no diagnosis that currently captures the experience of harm from gaming, where the requirements for the diagnosis of Gaming Disorder are not reached.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is evidence in support of the proposed new entity of 'Harmful Gaming', which encompasses mental and physical harm/impairment due to a repeated pattern of gaming, but where requirements for the diagnosis of Gaming Disorder are not met. Such a diagnosis would complete the spectrum of diagnoses available for problem or unhealthy gaming, similar to those for unhealthy substance use, and would provide a framework for a public health approach to reducing the overall harm from unhealthy gaming.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"292-300"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140897602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}