Pub Date : 2020-05-01DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00399
Daniel J. Miller, P. Cahill, M. Vitale, Suken A. Shah
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis represents a complex, three-dimensional deformity of the spine. Posterior spinal fusion is commonly performed in severe cases to avoid the long-term adverse sequelae associated with progressive spinal deformity. The goals of spinal fusion include halting the progression of deformity, optimizing spinal balance, and minimizing complications. Recent advances in short-segment spinal fixation have allowed for improved three-dimensional deformity correction. Preoperative planning and assessment of spinal flexibility is essential for successful deformity correction and optimization of long-term outcomes. Judicious use of releases and/or spinal osteotomies may allow for increased mobility of the spine but are associated with increased surgical time, blood loss, and risk of complications. Appreciation of implant design and material properties is critical for safe application of correction techniques. Although multiple reduction techniques have been described, no single technique is optimal for every patient.
{"title":"Posterior Correction Techniques for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.","authors":"Daniel J. Miller, P. Cahill, M. Vitale, Suken A. Shah","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00399","url":null,"abstract":"Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis represents a complex, three-dimensional deformity of the spine. Posterior spinal fusion is commonly performed in severe cases to avoid the long-term adverse sequelae associated with progressive spinal deformity. The goals of spinal fusion include halting the progression of deformity, optimizing spinal balance, and minimizing complications. Recent advances in short-segment spinal fixation have allowed for improved three-dimensional deformity correction. Preoperative planning and assessment of spinal flexibility is essential for successful deformity correction and optimization of long-term outcomes. Judicious use of releases and/or spinal osteotomies may allow for increased mobility of the spine but are associated with increased surgical time, blood loss, and risk of complications. Appreciation of implant design and material properties is critical for safe application of correction techniques. Although multiple reduction techniques have been described, no single technique is optimal for every patient.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132264993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-05-01DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00233
Ronit Shah, D. Talwar, R. Schwend, P. Sponseller, Julien T Aoyama, T. Ganley
INTRODUCTION Although the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America have established lawnmower safety guidelines, a notable number of injuries continue to occur. We sought to elaborate on the epidemiology of lawnmower injuries in the pediatric age group and compare urban versus rural injuries. METHODS The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients of 1 to 18 years of age from 2005 to 2017 who presented with a lawnmower injury. Results were computed using bivariate tests and multinomial regressions. RESULTS A total of 1,302 lawnmower injuries were identified (mean age 7.7 ± 5.1 years, range 1 to 18 years; 78.9% males). Incidence rates by region, adjusted for regional case volume, were 2.16 injuries per 100,000 cases in the South, 2.70 injuries per 100,000 cases in the Midwest, 1.34 injuries per 100,000 cases in the Northeast, and 0.56 injuries per 100,000 cases in the Western United States. After stratifying and adjusting for total case volume by locale (urban/rural), it was found that urban areas had an incidence rate of 1.47 injuries per 100,000 cases, whereas rural areas had a rate of 7.26 injuries per 100,000 cases. Rural areas had higher rates of infection and higher percentages of patients requiring inpatient stay. The surgical complication rate in rural areas was 5.5% as compared to 2.6% in urban areas. Based on urban/rural status, a significant difference was observed with the age group, length of stay, income, surgical complication, and presence of infection at the bivariate level with P < 0.05. Rural areas had an overall amputation rate of 15.5% compared with 9.6% in urban areas, with rural patients being 1.7 times more likely to undergo an amputation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The findings of this study show that numerous geographic and locale disparities exist in pediatric lawnmower injuries and reveal the need for improved safety awareness, especially in at-risk rural populations.
{"title":"Lawnmower Injuries in Children: A National 13-Year Study of Urban Versus Rural Injuries.","authors":"Ronit Shah, D. Talwar, R. Schwend, P. Sponseller, Julien T Aoyama, T. Ganley","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00233","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000Although the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America have established lawnmower safety guidelines, a notable number of injuries continue to occur. We sought to elaborate on the epidemiology of lawnmower injuries in the pediatric age group and compare urban versus rural injuries.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients of 1 to 18 years of age from 2005 to 2017 who presented with a lawnmower injury. Results were computed using bivariate tests and multinomial regressions.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 1,302 lawnmower injuries were identified (mean age 7.7 ± 5.1 years, range 1 to 18 years; 78.9% males). Incidence rates by region, adjusted for regional case volume, were 2.16 injuries per 100,000 cases in the South, 2.70 injuries per 100,000 cases in the Midwest, 1.34 injuries per 100,000 cases in the Northeast, and 0.56 injuries per 100,000 cases in the Western United States. After stratifying and adjusting for total case volume by locale (urban/rural), it was found that urban areas had an incidence rate of 1.47 injuries per 100,000 cases, whereas rural areas had a rate of 7.26 injuries per 100,000 cases. Rural areas had higher rates of infection and higher percentages of patients requiring inpatient stay. The surgical complication rate in rural areas was 5.5% as compared to 2.6% in urban areas. Based on urban/rural status, a significant difference was observed with the age group, length of stay, income, surgical complication, and presence of infection at the bivariate level with P < 0.05. Rural areas had an overall amputation rate of 15.5% compared with 9.6% in urban areas, with rural patients being 1.7 times more likely to undergo an amputation (P < 0.05).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000The findings of this study show that numerous geographic and locale disparities exist in pediatric lawnmower injuries and reveal the need for improved safety awareness, especially in at-risk rural populations.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125248124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-05-01DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00146
Sarah E Lindsay, Aaron Alokozai, Sara L. Eppler, P. Fox, Catherine Curtin, M. Gardner, R. Avedian, A. Palanca, G. Abrams, I. Cheng, R. Kamal
INTRODUCTION To assess bounds of shared decision making in orthopaedic surgery, we conducted an exploratory study to examine the extent to which patients want to be involved in decision making in the management of a musculoskeletal condition. METHODS One hundred fifteen patients at an orthopaedic surgery clinic were asked to rate preferred level of involvement in 25 common theoretical clinical decisions (passive [0], semipassive [1 to 4], equally shared involvement between patient and surgeon [5], semiactive [6 to 9], active [10]). RESULTS Patients preferred semipassive roles in 92% of decisions assessed. Patients wanted to be most involved in scheduling surgical treatments (4.75 ± 2.65) and least involved in determining incision sizes (1.13 ± 1.98). No difference exists in desired decision-making responsibility between patients who had undergone orthopaedic surgery previously and those who had not. Younger and educated patients preferred more decision-making responsibility. Those with Medicare desired more passive roles. DISCUSSION Despite the importance of shared decision making on delivering patient-centered care, our results suggest that patients do not prefer to share all decisions.
{"title":"Patient Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Not All Decisions Should Be Shared.","authors":"Sarah E Lindsay, Aaron Alokozai, Sara L. Eppler, P. Fox, Catherine Curtin, M. Gardner, R. Avedian, A. Palanca, G. Abrams, I. Cheng, R. Kamal","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00146","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000To assess bounds of shared decision making in orthopaedic surgery, we conducted an exploratory study to examine the extent to which patients want to be involved in decision making in the management of a musculoskeletal condition.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000One hundred fifteen patients at an orthopaedic surgery clinic were asked to rate preferred level of involvement in 25 common theoretical clinical decisions (passive [0], semipassive [1 to 4], equally shared involvement between patient and surgeon [5], semiactive [6 to 9], active [10]).\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Patients preferred semipassive roles in 92% of decisions assessed. Patients wanted to be most involved in scheduling surgical treatments (4.75 ± 2.65) and least involved in determining incision sizes (1.13 ± 1.98). No difference exists in desired decision-making responsibility between patients who had undergone orthopaedic surgery previously and those who had not. Younger and educated patients preferred more decision-making responsibility. Those with Medicare desired more passive roles.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Despite the importance of shared decision making on delivering patient-centered care, our results suggest that patients do not prefer to share all decisions.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129282585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-15DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00104
A. Galivanche, Kareem J. Kebaish, M. Adrados, T. Ottesen, A. Varthi, L. Rubin, J. Grauer
INTRODUCTION The current study sought to determine the factors predictive of postoperative pressure ulcer development by analyzing extensive multicenter outcomes data from the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS The 2016 NSQIP Participant Use File and Hip Fracture Procedure Targeted file were used to identify the risk factors for the development of postoperative pressure ulcers after hip fracture surgery in a geriatric cohort. Multivariate regressions were performed to identify preoperative comorbidities and postoperative complications that are risk factors for developing postoperative pressure ulcers. RESULTS Of 8,871 geriatric hip fracture patients included in the study cohort, 457 (5.15%) developed pressure ulcers. Multivariate regressions identified the following preoperative risk factors for developing a postoperative pressure ulcer (in order of decreasing relative risk): preoperative sepsis, elevated platelet count, insulin-dependent diabetes, and preexisting pressure ulcer. Multivariate regressions also identified the following postoperative complications as risk factors for developing a postoperative pressure ulcer: postoperative sepsis, postoperative pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and postoperative delirium. DISCUSSION The identified preoperative factors and postoperative complications should help guide quality improvement programs.
{"title":"Postoperative Pressure Ulcers After Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery Are Predicted by Defined Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications.","authors":"A. Galivanche, Kareem J. Kebaish, M. Adrados, T. Ottesen, A. Varthi, L. Rubin, J. Grauer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00104","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The current study sought to determine the factors predictive of postoperative pressure ulcer development by analyzing extensive multicenter outcomes data from the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS The 2016 NSQIP Participant Use File and Hip Fracture Procedure Targeted file were used to identify the risk factors for the development of postoperative pressure ulcers after hip fracture surgery in a geriatric cohort. Multivariate regressions were performed to identify preoperative comorbidities and postoperative complications that are risk factors for developing postoperative pressure ulcers. RESULTS Of 8,871 geriatric hip fracture patients included in the study cohort, 457 (5.15%) developed pressure ulcers. Multivariate regressions identified the following preoperative risk factors for developing a postoperative pressure ulcer (in order of decreasing relative risk): preoperative sepsis, elevated platelet count, insulin-dependent diabetes, and preexisting pressure ulcer. Multivariate regressions also identified the following postoperative complications as risk factors for developing a postoperative pressure ulcer: postoperative sepsis, postoperative pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and postoperative delirium. DISCUSSION The identified preoperative factors and postoperative complications should help guide quality improvement programs.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134181555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-15DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00236
Brian T. Velasco, Michael Y. Ye, Bonnie Y. Chien, J. Kwon, Christopher P. Miller
BACKGROUND Radiographs are the most commonly available diagnostic imaging modalities used to evaluate orthopaedic conditions. In addition to suspected findings based on the initial indication to obtain radiographic images, incidental findings may be observed as well, some of which may have notable medical and legal ramifications. This study evaluates the number of incidental findings reported from orthopaedic radiographs ordered in an academic orthopaedic multispecialty group over 1 year. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of 13,948 eligible radiographs recorded at our institution over a 12-month period. Reports were categorized based on examination type. Incidental findings were categorized as having concern for possible malignancy versus likely benign conditions. The possibly malignant findings were then further subdivided into either bone or lung malignancies. The benign findings were subcategorized by etiology and anatomic location. RESULTS Thirteen thousand nine hundred forty-eight radiographs were evaluated, and 289 (2.07%) incidental findings were identified. The three study categories with the highest prevalence of incidental findings were spine (3.96%), leg length alignment (3.94%), and pelvic and hip (2.81%) radiographs. The three most common types of incidental findings identified were for possible malignancy or metastases in bone (30.1%), benign bone disease (24.9%), and gastrointestinal conditions (6.57%). Follow-up was recommended for 122 (42.2%) incidental findings. DISCUSSION This study describes the prevalence of incidental findings on orthopaedic radiographs in adults. Axial radiographs such as of the spine and pelvis are more likely to report an incidental finding as opposed to appendicular radiographs of distal extremities. The exception is leg alignment radiographs that include the entire lower extremity and pelvis and image a larger area of the body. Nearly one-third of incidental findings were suspicious for possible malignancy or metastases. Additional diagnostic workup with focused imaging is often recommended. This information is useful to orthopaedic surgeons who read their own radiographs (without formal radiologist interpretation) to increase awareness of common, concerning incidental findings that may be missed and warrant additional follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
{"title":"Prevalence of Incidental Benign and Malignant Lesions on Radiographs Ordered by Orthopaedic Surgeons.","authors":"Brian T. Velasco, Michael Y. Ye, Bonnie Y. Chien, J. Kwon, Christopher P. Miller","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00236","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Radiographs are the most commonly available diagnostic imaging modalities used to evaluate orthopaedic conditions. In addition to suspected findings based on the initial indication to obtain radiographic images, incidental findings may be observed as well, some of which may have notable medical and legal ramifications. This study evaluates the number of incidental findings reported from orthopaedic radiographs ordered in an academic orthopaedic multispecialty group over 1 year.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A retrospective review was conducted of 13,948 eligible radiographs recorded at our institution over a 12-month period. Reports were categorized based on examination type. Incidental findings were categorized as having concern for possible malignancy versus likely benign conditions. The possibly malignant findings were then further subdivided into either bone or lung malignancies. The benign findings were subcategorized by etiology and anatomic location.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Thirteen thousand nine hundred forty-eight radiographs were evaluated, and 289 (2.07%) incidental findings were identified. The three study categories with the highest prevalence of incidental findings were spine (3.96%), leg length alignment (3.94%), and pelvic and hip (2.81%) radiographs. The three most common types of incidental findings identified were for possible malignancy or metastases in bone (30.1%), benign bone disease (24.9%), and gastrointestinal conditions (6.57%). Follow-up was recommended for 122 (42.2%) incidental findings.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000This study describes the prevalence of incidental findings on orthopaedic radiographs in adults. Axial radiographs such as of the spine and pelvis are more likely to report an incidental finding as opposed to appendicular radiographs of distal extremities. The exception is leg alignment radiographs that include the entire lower extremity and pelvis and image a larger area of the body. Nearly one-third of incidental findings were suspicious for possible malignancy or metastases. Additional diagnostic workup with focused imaging is often recommended. This information is useful to orthopaedic surgeons who read their own radiographs (without formal radiologist interpretation) to increase awareness of common, concerning incidental findings that may be missed and warrant additional follow-up.\u0000\u0000\u0000LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\u0000Level III.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124643746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-15DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00832
Dong-Ho Lee, K. Riew, S. Choi, S. Im, W. Nam, Y. Yoon, C. Hong
INTRODUCTION Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is associated with a high incidence of surgery-related complications. A novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy [VBSO]) has been developed to prevent such complications. This study attests the efficacy and safety of VBSO versus those of standard ACCF. METHODS Patients requiring surgery for cervical OPLL underwent VBSO (24 patients) or ACCF (38 patients). Operating time, estimated blood loss, neurologic outcomes, complications, and various radiographic parameters were investigated. RESULTS The VBSO group showed a shorter mean operating time and less estimated blood loss versus the ACCF group. Sixteen patients in the ACCF group experienced various complications, namely neurologic deficit (two patients), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (four patients), graft migration (three patients), and pseudarthrosis (seven patients). In the VBSO group, only pseudarthrosis was reported (two patients). CONCLUSIONS VBSO provides similar neurologic outcomes with a shorter operating time and less bleeding compared with ACCF. Surgeons do not need to directly manipulate the OPLL mass or dissect the interspace between the OPLL and dura mater. Therefore, this technique may decrease the incidence of surgery-related complications. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective comparative study.
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Anterior Decompression Technique for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine.","authors":"Dong-Ho Lee, K. Riew, S. Choi, S. Im, W. Nam, Y. Yoon, C. Hong","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00832","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is associated with a high incidence of surgery-related complications. A novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy [VBSO]) has been developed to prevent such complications. This study attests the efficacy and safety of VBSO versus those of standard ACCF.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000Patients requiring surgery for cervical OPLL underwent VBSO (24 patients) or ACCF (38 patients). Operating time, estimated blood loss, neurologic outcomes, complications, and various radiographic parameters were investigated.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000The VBSO group showed a shorter mean operating time and less estimated blood loss versus the ACCF group. Sixteen patients in the ACCF group experienced various complications, namely neurologic deficit (two patients), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (four patients), graft migration (three patients), and pseudarthrosis (seven patients). In the VBSO group, only pseudarthrosis was reported (two patients).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000VBSO provides similar neurologic outcomes with a shorter operating time and less bleeding compared with ACCF. Surgeons do not need to directly manipulate the OPLL mass or dissect the interspace between the OPLL and dura mater. Therefore, this technique may decrease the incidence of surgery-related complications.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000Retrospective comparative study.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114605183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-15DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00925
K. Connolly, R. Kleinman, K. Stevenson, M. Neuman, S. Mehta
INTRODUCTION Postoperative delirium is associated with opioid use in the elderly and is a common complication of geriatric hip fractures, with reported incidences from 16% to 70%. Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen is a safe and efficacious medication in elderly patients and has been shown to reduce use of opioids after hip fracture. At our institution, IV acetaminophen was implemented for the first 24 hours postoperatively as part of a multimodal pain control regimen for geriatric hip fracture patients. METHODS A retrospective review of 123 hip fragility fracture patients older than 60 years from January 2016 to December 2016 was performed. Delirium was identified using a validated chart-based review tool. The rate of delirium, as well as length of stay, pain scores, opioid administration, need for one-to-one supervision, and readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS Sixty-five patients (52.8%) received IV acetaminophen during this period. No notable differences were found in baseline characteristics between groups. Ten of 65 patients receiving IV acetaminophen postoperatively experienced delirium compared with 19 of 58 who did not receive the medication (15.4% versus 32.8%, P = 0.024). The IV acetaminophen group also required fewer doses of IV opioids on postoperative day 1 (0.37 versus 1.19 doses, P = 0.008), were less likely to require one-to-one supervision (9.2% versus 24.1%, P = 0.025), and had shorter lengths of hospital stay (6.37 versus 8.47 days, P = 0.037). Readmission rates and discharge dispositions did not vary with significance between the two groups. CONCLUSION The inclusion of IV acetaminophen as part of a multimodal pain regimen led to fewer episodes of delirium in this study. The reduced use of opioids immediately after surgery may have been a large factor in this outcome. Lower delirium rates may reduce the utilization of inpatient resources for direct patient supervision and provide for shorter hospital stays.
{"title":"Delirium Reduced With Intravenous Acetaminophen in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients.","authors":"K. Connolly, R. Kleinman, K. Stevenson, M. Neuman, S. Mehta","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00925","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000Postoperative delirium is associated with opioid use in the elderly and is a common complication of geriatric hip fractures, with reported incidences from 16% to 70%. Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen is a safe and efficacious medication in elderly patients and has been shown to reduce use of opioids after hip fracture. At our institution, IV acetaminophen was implemented for the first 24 hours postoperatively as part of a multimodal pain control regimen for geriatric hip fracture patients.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A retrospective review of 123 hip fragility fracture patients older than 60 years from January 2016 to December 2016 was performed. Delirium was identified using a validated chart-based review tool. The rate of delirium, as well as length of stay, pain scores, opioid administration, need for one-to-one supervision, and readmissions were analyzed.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Sixty-five patients (52.8%) received IV acetaminophen during this period. No notable differences were found in baseline characteristics between groups. Ten of 65 patients receiving IV acetaminophen postoperatively experienced delirium compared with 19 of 58 who did not receive the medication (15.4% versus 32.8%, P = 0.024). The IV acetaminophen group also required fewer doses of IV opioids on postoperative day 1 (0.37 versus 1.19 doses, P = 0.008), were less likely to require one-to-one supervision (9.2% versus 24.1%, P = 0.025), and had shorter lengths of hospital stay (6.37 versus 8.47 days, P = 0.037). Readmission rates and discharge dispositions did not vary with significance between the two groups.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000The inclusion of IV acetaminophen as part of a multimodal pain regimen led to fewer episodes of delirium in this study. The reduced use of opioids immediately after surgery may have been a large factor in this outcome. Lower delirium rates may reduce the utilization of inpatient resources for direct patient supervision and provide for shorter hospital stays.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125247275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-01DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00030
E. Y. Chen, L. Betancourt, Lulu Li, Emma Trucks, Andrew J. Marcantonio, P. Tornetta
BACKGROUND Opioid-related mortality has increased over the past 2 decades, leading to the recognition of a nationwide opioid epidemic and prompting physicians to reexamine their opioid prescribing practices. At our institutions, we had no protocol for prescribing opioids upon discharge after inpatient orthopaedic surgery, resulting in inconsistent and potentially excessive prescribing. Here, we report the results of the implementation of a patient-specific protocol using an opioid taper calculator to standardize opioid prescribing at discharge after inpatient orthopaedic surgery. METHODS The opioid taper calculator is a tool that creates a patient-specific opioid taper based on each patient's 24-hour predischarge opioid utilization. We implemented this taper for patients discharged after inpatient orthopaedic surgery at our two institutions (Boston Medical Center and Lahey Hospital and Medical Center-Burlington Campus). We compared discharge opioid quantities between orthopaedic patients postimplementation and quantities prescribed preimplementation. We also compared discharge opioid quantities between orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic surgical services over the same time period. RESULTS Nine-months postimplementation, a patient-specific taper was used in 74% of eligible discharges, resulting in a 24% reduction in opioids prescribed at discharge, along with a 35% reduction in variance. Over the same time frame, a smaller reduction (9%) was seen in the opioids prescribed at discharge by nonorthopaedic services. The most notable reductions were seen after total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusions. Despite this reduction, most patients (65%) reported receiving sufficient opioids, and no substantial change was observed in 30-day postdischarge opioid prescription refills after versus before protocol implementation (1.58 versus 1.71 fills per discharge). DISCUSSION Using the opioid taper calculator, a patient-specific taper can be successfully used to standardize opioid prescribing at discharge after inpatient orthopaedic surgery without a substantial risk of underprescription. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II.
{"title":"Standardized, Patient-specific, Postoperative Opioid Prescribing After Inpatient Orthopaedic Surgery.","authors":"E. Y. Chen, L. Betancourt, Lulu Li, Emma Trucks, Andrew J. Marcantonio, P. Tornetta","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00030","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Opioid-related mortality has increased over the past 2 decades, leading to the recognition of a nationwide opioid epidemic and prompting physicians to reexamine their opioid prescribing practices. At our institutions, we had no protocol for prescribing opioids upon discharge after inpatient orthopaedic surgery, resulting in inconsistent and potentially excessive prescribing. Here, we report the results of the implementation of a patient-specific protocol using an opioid taper calculator to standardize opioid prescribing at discharge after inpatient orthopaedic surgery.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000The opioid taper calculator is a tool that creates a patient-specific opioid taper based on each patient's 24-hour predischarge opioid utilization. We implemented this taper for patients discharged after inpatient orthopaedic surgery at our two institutions (Boston Medical Center and Lahey Hospital and Medical Center-Burlington Campus). We compared discharge opioid quantities between orthopaedic patients postimplementation and quantities prescribed preimplementation. We also compared discharge opioid quantities between orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic surgical services over the same time period.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Nine-months postimplementation, a patient-specific taper was used in 74% of eligible discharges, resulting in a 24% reduction in opioids prescribed at discharge, along with a 35% reduction in variance. Over the same time frame, a smaller reduction (9%) was seen in the opioids prescribed at discharge by nonorthopaedic services. The most notable reductions were seen after total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusions. Despite this reduction, most patients (65%) reported receiving sufficient opioids, and no substantial change was observed in 30-day postdischarge opioid prescription refills after versus before protocol implementation (1.58 versus 1.71 fills per discharge).\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Using the opioid taper calculator, a patient-specific taper can be successfully used to standardize opioid prescribing at discharge after inpatient orthopaedic surgery without a substantial risk of underprescription.\u0000\u0000\u0000LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\u0000Level II.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124999232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-01DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00111
Michael Lyudmer, Benjamin J. Levy, Ari J. Holtzman, S. Sankaranarayanan, Eloy Tabeayo, Konrad I. Gruson
INTRODUCTION Plain radiographs of the shoulder are routinely obtained for patients presenting with atraumatic shoulder pain, although the diagnostic utility of this imaging modality is unclear. Despite this, patients often prefer to obtain radiographs and may associate them with a more satisfactory visit. METHODS New patients presenting with atraumatic shoulder pain were provided with information regarding the potential advantages and disadvantages of plain radiographs as part of their visit. Patients then decided whether to receive radiographs and baseline patient demographics were collected. A detailed physical examination and history was performed by a fellowship-trained provider, and a preliminary diagnosis and tentative treatment plan was formulated. The radiographs were then reviewed to determine whether the diagnosis and treatment plan was altered by addition of the radiographs. Patients who opted for radiographs then reported whether they felt the radiographs aided in diagnosis and treatment and whether the addition of the radiograph influenced their visit satisfaction. RESULTS A total of 220 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 121 patients (55%) requested a radiograph. The mean age was 57.1 ± 16.1 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Lack of bachelor's degree (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 6.2; P = 0.01), lack of previous contralateral shoulder pain (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.0 to 8.2; P = 0.0001), and lack of a previous shoulder radiograph (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 4.1 to 16.9; P < 0.0001) or MRI within the last 6 months (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 26.8; P = 0.01) were independently associated with patient preference to obtain radiographs for atraumatic shoulder pain. Of the 121 patients who requested radiographs, 117 (96.7%) felt that radiographs improved their satisfaction. DISCUSSION Patients who obtained radiographs overwhelmingly reported its importance in improving visit satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy. Given the increasing emphasis on shared decision making, further study of patient factors influencing the decision to obtain routine radiographs will lead to more efficient practice management and potentially improved patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II (Diagnostic).
{"title":"Patient Preferences for Plain Radiographs in the Setting of Atraumatic Shoulder Pain: Which Factors Influence Their Decision?","authors":"Michael Lyudmer, Benjamin J. Levy, Ari J. Holtzman, S. Sankaranarayanan, Eloy Tabeayo, Konrad I. Gruson","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00111","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000Plain radiographs of the shoulder are routinely obtained for patients presenting with atraumatic shoulder pain, although the diagnostic utility of this imaging modality is unclear. Despite this, patients often prefer to obtain radiographs and may associate them with a more satisfactory visit.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000New patients presenting with atraumatic shoulder pain were provided with information regarding the potential advantages and disadvantages of plain radiographs as part of their visit. Patients then decided whether to receive radiographs and baseline patient demographics were collected. A detailed physical examination and history was performed by a fellowship-trained provider, and a preliminary diagnosis and tentative treatment plan was formulated. The radiographs were then reviewed to determine whether the diagnosis and treatment plan was altered by addition of the radiographs. Patients who opted for radiographs then reported whether they felt the radiographs aided in diagnosis and treatment and whether the addition of the radiograph influenced their visit satisfaction.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 220 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 121 patients (55%) requested a radiograph. The mean age was 57.1 ± 16.1 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Lack of bachelor's degree (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 6.2; P = 0.01), lack of previous contralateral shoulder pain (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.0 to 8.2; P = 0.0001), and lack of a previous shoulder radiograph (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 4.1 to 16.9; P < 0.0001) or MRI within the last 6 months (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 26.8; P = 0.01) were independently associated with patient preference to obtain radiographs for atraumatic shoulder pain. Of the 121 patients who requested radiographs, 117 (96.7%) felt that radiographs improved their satisfaction.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Patients who obtained radiographs overwhelmingly reported its importance in improving visit satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy. Given the increasing emphasis on shared decision making, further study of patient factors influencing the decision to obtain routine radiographs will lead to more efficient practice management and potentially improved patient satisfaction.\u0000\u0000\u0000LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\u0000Level II (Diagnostic).","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132408143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-01DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00279
T. Grace, K. Choo, Joseph T. Patterson, Krishn Khanna, B. Feeley, Alan L. Zhang
INTRODUCTION Tailoring opioid prescriptions to inpatient use after orthopaedic procedures may effectively control pain while limiting overprescription but may not be common in the current orthopaedic practice. METHODS A retrospective review identified opioid-naïve patients admitted after any orthopaedic procedure. Daily and total prescription quantities as well as patient-specific factors were collected. The total opioids used the day before discharge was compared with the total opioids prescribed for the day after discharge. Refill rates were then compared between patients whose daily discharge prescription regimen far exceeded or approximated their predischarge opioid consumption. RESULTS Six hundred thirteen patients were included (ages 18 to 95 years). The total opioids prescribed for the 24 hours after discharge significantly exceeded the opioids consumed the 24 hours before discharge for each orthopaedic subspecialty. The excessive-prescription group (409 patients) received greater daily opioid (120 oral morphine equivalents [OMEs] versus 60 OMEs; P < 0.01) and total opioid (750 OMEs versus 512.5 OMEs; P < 0.01) at discharge but was more likely to refill their opioid prescription within 30 days of discharge (27.6% versus 20.1%; P = 0.043). DISCUSSION Opioid regimens prescribed after an orthopaedic surgery frequently exceed inpatient opioid use. Opioid regimens that approximate inpatient use may help curb overprescription and are not associated with higher refill rates compared with more excessive prescriptions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.
{"title":"A Review of Inpatient Opioid Consumption and Discharge Prescription Patterns After Orthopaedic Procedures.","authors":"T. Grace, K. Choo, Joseph T. Patterson, Krishn Khanna, B. Feeley, Alan L. Zhang","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00279","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000Tailoring opioid prescriptions to inpatient use after orthopaedic procedures may effectively control pain while limiting overprescription but may not be common in the current orthopaedic practice.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A retrospective review identified opioid-naïve patients admitted after any orthopaedic procedure. Daily and total prescription quantities as well as patient-specific factors were collected. The total opioids used the day before discharge was compared with the total opioids prescribed for the day after discharge. Refill rates were then compared between patients whose daily discharge prescription regimen far exceeded or approximated their predischarge opioid consumption.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Six hundred thirteen patients were included (ages 18 to 95 years). The total opioids prescribed for the 24 hours after discharge significantly exceeded the opioids consumed the 24 hours before discharge for each orthopaedic subspecialty. The excessive-prescription group (409 patients) received greater daily opioid (120 oral morphine equivalents [OMEs] versus 60 OMEs; P < 0.01) and total opioid (750 OMEs versus 512.5 OMEs; P < 0.01) at discharge but was more likely to refill their opioid prescription within 30 days of discharge (27.6% versus 20.1%; P = 0.043).\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Opioid regimens prescribed after an orthopaedic surgery frequently exceed inpatient opioid use. Opioid regimens that approximate inpatient use may help curb overprescription and are not associated with higher refill rates compared with more excessive prescriptions.\u0000\u0000\u0000LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\u0000Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126104162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：