Pub Date : 2022-10-01Epub Date: 2022-08-26DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01219
Patrick J Denard, Anthony A Romeo
Glenoid deformity has an important effect on outcomes and complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis. The B2/B3 glenoid has particularly been associated with a poorer outcome with shoulder arthroplasty compared with other glenoid types. One of the primary challenges is striking a balance between deformity correction and joint line preservation. Recently, there has been a proliferation of both anatomic and reverse implants that may be used to address glenoid deformity. The purpose of this review was to provide an evidence-based approach for addressing glenoid deformity associated with primary glenohumeral arthritis.
{"title":"Considerations for Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Selection in Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis With Posterior Glenoid Deformity.","authors":"Patrick J Denard, Anthony A Romeo","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01219","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glenoid deformity has an important effect on outcomes and complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis. The B2/B3 glenoid has particularly been associated with a poorer outcome with shoulder arthroplasty compared with other glenoid types. One of the primary challenges is striking a balance between deformity correction and joint line preservation. Recently, there has been a proliferation of both anatomic and reverse implants that may be used to address glenoid deformity. The purpose of this review was to provide an evidence-based approach for addressing glenoid deformity associated with primary glenohumeral arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1240-e1248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40420085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00838
Mia McNulty, Nicole Look, Katya Strage, Alexander Lauder
Introduction: Cost and efficiency have made electric scooters (e-scooters) popular in urban areas, but many orthopaedic injuries are associated with their use.
Methods: A retrospective review of e-scooter-related injuries at a level one trauma center identified injury patterns and hospital-associated costs before and after widespread commercial introduction of e-scooters.
Results: Twenty-three and 197 patients were included in preimplementation and postimplementation groups, respectively. Hospital admission increased from 11% to 62% after commercial introduction. Cost of care increased from $1.8 million to $7.6 million, and 61% of orthopaedic injuries required surgery. The most common orthopaedic injuries were distal radius fractures. Seventy-three percent of the patients tested were intoxicated at the time of injury.
Discussion: This study categorizes injury patterns and highlights increased hospital-related admissions and surgeries associated with e-scooters. The high rate of intoxicated rider injuries emphasizes the need for laws guiding operation of e-scooters.
{"title":"Orthopaedic Injuries After Introduction of Electric Scooters to Denver, Colorado.","authors":"Mia McNulty, Nicole Look, Katya Strage, Alexander Lauder","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00838","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cost and efficiency have made electric scooters (e-scooters) popular in urban areas, but many orthopaedic injuries are associated with their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of e-scooter-related injuries at a level one trauma center identified injury patterns and hospital-associated costs before and after widespread commercial introduction of e-scooters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three and 197 patients were included in preimplementation and postimplementation groups, respectively. Hospital admission increased from 11% to 62% after commercial introduction. Cost of care increased from $1.8 million to $7.6 million, and 61% of orthopaedic injuries required surgery. The most common orthopaedic injuries were distal radius fractures. Seventy-three percent of the patients tested were intoxicated at the time of injury.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study categorizes injury patterns and highlights increased hospital-related admissions and surgeries associated with e-scooters. The high rate of intoxicated rider injuries emphasizes the need for laws guiding operation of e-scooters.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"897-902"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40651692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15Epub Date: 2022-07-12DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01143
Ishaq O Ibrahim, Abdulai Bangura, Nathan N O'Hara, Andrew N Pollak, Gerard P Slobogean, Robert V O'Toole, Christopher G Langhammer
Introduction: Socioeconomic factors may introduce barriers to telemedicine care access. This study examines changes in clinic absenteeism for orthopaedic trauma patients after the introduction of a telemedicine postoperative follow-up option during the COVID-19 pandemic with attention to patient socioeconomic status (SES).
Methods: Patients (n = 1,060) undergoing surgical treatment of pelvic and extremity trauma were retrospectively assigned to preintervention and postintervention cohorts using a quasi-experimental design. The intervention is the April 2020 introduction of a telemedicine follow-up option for postoperative trauma care. The primary outcome was the missed visit rate (MVR) for postoperative appointments. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the relative change in MVR adjusting for patient age and sex. SES-based subgroup analysis was based on the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) according to home address.
Results: The pre-telemedicine group included 635 patients; the post-telemedicine group included 425 patients. The median MVR in the pre-telemedicine group was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 45%) and 24% (95% CI, 6% to 43%) in the post-telemedicine group. Low SES was associated with a 40% relative increase in MVR (95% CI, 17% to 67%, P < 0.001) compared with patients with high SES. Relative MVR changes between pre-telemedicine and post-telemedicine groups did not reach statistical significance in any socioeconomic strata (low ADI, -6%; 95% CI, -25% to 17%; P = 0.56; medium ADI, -18%; 95% CI, -35% to 2%; P = 0.07; high ADI, -12%; 95% CI, -28% to 7%; P = 0.20).
Conclusions: Low SES was associated with a higher MVR both before and after the introduction of a telemedicine option. However, no evidence in this cohort demonstrated a change in absenteeism based on SES after the introduction of the telemedicine option. Clinicians should be reassured that there is no evidence that telemedicine introduces additional socioeconomic bias in postoperative orthopaedic trauma care.
{"title":"Telemedicine and Socioeconomics in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Ishaq O Ibrahim, Abdulai Bangura, Nathan N O'Hara, Andrew N Pollak, Gerard P Slobogean, Robert V O'Toole, Christopher G Langhammer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Socioeconomic factors may introduce barriers to telemedicine care access. This study examines changes in clinic absenteeism for orthopaedic trauma patients after the introduction of a telemedicine postoperative follow-up option during the COVID-19 pandemic with attention to patient socioeconomic status (SES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 1,060) undergoing surgical treatment of pelvic and extremity trauma were retrospectively assigned to preintervention and postintervention cohorts using a quasi-experimental design. The intervention is the April 2020 introduction of a telemedicine follow-up option for postoperative trauma care. The primary outcome was the missed visit rate (MVR) for postoperative appointments. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the relative change in MVR adjusting for patient age and sex. SES-based subgroup analysis was based on the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) according to home address.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre-telemedicine group included 635 patients; the post-telemedicine group included 425 patients. The median MVR in the pre-telemedicine group was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 45%) and 24% (95% CI, 6% to 43%) in the post-telemedicine group. Low SES was associated with a 40% relative increase in MVR (95% CI, 17% to 67%, P < 0.001) compared with patients with high SES. Relative MVR changes between pre-telemedicine and post-telemedicine groups did not reach statistical significance in any socioeconomic strata (low ADI, -6%; 95% CI, -25% to 17%; P = 0.56; medium ADI, -18%; 95% CI, -35% to 2%; P = 0.07; high ADI, -12%; 95% CI, -28% to 7%; P = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low SES was associated with a higher MVR both before and after the introduction of a telemedicine option. However, no evidence in this cohort demonstrated a change in absenteeism based on SES after the introduction of the telemedicine option. Clinicians should be reassured that there is no evidence that telemedicine introduces additional socioeconomic bias in postoperative orthopaedic trauma care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"910-916"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40593288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15Epub Date: 2022-08-16DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01046
Shafic Sraj, Joshua T Henderson, Michelle Bramer, Jack Gelman
Acute compartment syndrome is a surgical emergency in the extremities resulting from increased compartmental pressure, requiring immediate fasciotomy to resolve muscular compromise. As the mainstay treatment, fasciotomies involve substantial skin incisions and are thus prone to complications such as skin necrosis, wound infection, and permanent disability. Multidisciplinary care instituted at the time of fasciotomy can facilitate timely closure and minimize the complication profile. Several approaches are available to enhance outcomes of fasciotomy wounds, and a comprehensive knowledge of these options affords the treating surgeon greater flexibility and confidence in optimal management. Common techniques include early primary closure, gradual approximation, skin grafting, and negative pressure therapy. There is currently no consensus on the best method of closure. The purpose of this study was to review fasciotomy wound management from the time of initial release to final closure. Highlights include preparation for closing these wounds; the various techniques for fasciotomy closure, including adjunct options; evaluation of timing and staging; and injury-specific features, such as fracture management, limited subcutaneous tissues, and hand fasciotomies. Combining the perspectives of orthopaedic and plastic surgery, this review evaluates the benefits of multiple closure methods and highlights the importance of planning closure at the time of release.
{"title":"Principles of Fasciotomy Closure After Compartment Syndrome Release.","authors":"Shafic Sraj, Joshua T Henderson, Michelle Bramer, Jack Gelman","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute compartment syndrome is a surgical emergency in the extremities resulting from increased compartmental pressure, requiring immediate fasciotomy to resolve muscular compromise. As the mainstay treatment, fasciotomies involve substantial skin incisions and are thus prone to complications such as skin necrosis, wound infection, and permanent disability. Multidisciplinary care instituted at the time of fasciotomy can facilitate timely closure and minimize the complication profile. Several approaches are available to enhance outcomes of fasciotomy wounds, and a comprehensive knowledge of these options affords the treating surgeon greater flexibility and confidence in optimal management. Common techniques include early primary closure, gradual approximation, skin grafting, and negative pressure therapy. There is currently no consensus on the best method of closure. The purpose of this study was to review fasciotomy wound management from the time of initial release to final closure. Highlights include preparation for closing these wounds; the various techniques for fasciotomy closure, including adjunct options; evaluation of timing and staging; and injury-specific features, such as fracture management, limited subcutaneous tissues, and hand fasciotomies. Combining the perspectives of orthopaedic and plastic surgery, this review evaluates the benefits of multiple closure methods and highlights the importance of planning closure at the time of release.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"879-887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40652131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury between arm positionings of 45° and 60° abduction in anterolateral humeral plating using a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate.
Methods: Fifty-six humeri of cadavers in the supine position with 45° of arm abduction were exposed through the anterolateral approach. A hypothetical fracture line was marked at the middle of the humerus, and a precontoured ten-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate was applied and fixed to the anterolateral surface. After the fixation, the radial nerve was exposed through a triceps-splitting approach. Screws in contact with or which had penetrated the radial nerve were deemed to be injuries. Then, the screws and plate were removed, the arm changed to the 60° arm abduction position, and the steps of applying the plate and inserting the screws were followed as in the 45° arm abduction step.
Results: The screws which could potentially injure the radial nerve were those of the second to sixth screw holes in both the 45° and 60° of arm abduction positions. The incidences of iatrogenic radial nerve injury of the second to sixth screw holes in the 45° position were 5.36%, 39.29%, 80.36%, 60.71%, and 10.71%, respectively, and at the 60° position were 5.36%, 53.57%, 83.93%, 60.71%, and 7.14%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in risk of injury between the two positions in all screw holes (all P-values > 0.05).
Discussion: In anterolateral humeral shaft fixation, arm abduction position did not affect the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, with the main risk from certain screw holes. The surgeon should be careful in screw insertion, especially at the fourth and fifth screw holes.
{"title":"Risk of Radial Nerve Injury in Anterolateral Humeral Shaft Plating.","authors":"Supatat Chirattikalwong, Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit, Watit Wuttimanop, Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00970","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00970","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury between arm positionings of 45° and 60° abduction in anterolateral humeral plating using a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six humeri of cadavers in the supine position with 45° of arm abduction were exposed through the anterolateral approach. A hypothetical fracture line was marked at the middle of the humerus, and a precontoured ten-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate was applied and fixed to the anterolateral surface. After the fixation, the radial nerve was exposed through a triceps-splitting approach. Screws in contact with or which had penetrated the radial nerve were deemed to be injuries. Then, the screws and plate were removed, the arm changed to the 60° arm abduction position, and the steps of applying the plate and inserting the screws were followed as in the 45° arm abduction step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screws which could potentially injure the radial nerve were those of the second to sixth screw holes in both the 45° and 60° of arm abduction positions. The incidences of iatrogenic radial nerve injury of the second to sixth screw holes in the 45° position were 5.36%, 39.29%, 80.36%, 60.71%, and 10.71%, respectively, and at the 60° position were 5.36%, 53.57%, 83.93%, 60.71%, and 7.14%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in risk of injury between the two positions in all screw holes (all P-values > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In anterolateral humeral shaft fixation, arm abduction position did not affect the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, with the main risk from certain screw holes. The surgeon should be careful in screw insertion, especially at the fourth and fifth screw holes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; cadaveric study.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"903-909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40377753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00883
Bryan M Saltzman, Shangcheng Wang, Nahir A Habet, Ian S Hong, David P Trofa, Joshua D Meade, James E Fleischli, Dana P Piasecki
Purpose: The purpose of this finite element analysis was to compare femoral tunnel length; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft bending angle; and peak graft stress, contact force, and contact area created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal (AMP), and hybrid transtibial techniques.
Methods: Finite element analysis modeling was used to examine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction models based on transtibial, AMP, and hybrid transtibial femoral tunnel drilling techniques. An evaluation of femoral tunnel length, graft bending angle, peak graft stress, contact force, and contact area was done in comparison of these techniques.
Results: The femoral tunnel created with the hybrid transtibial technique was 45.3 mm, which was 13.3% longer than that achieved with the AMP technique but 15.2% shorter than that with the transtibial technique. The femoral graft bending angle with the hybrid transtibial technique (105°) was less acute than that with the AMP technique (102°), but more acute than that with the transtibial technique (109°). At 11° knee flexion, the hybrid transtibial technique had 22% less femoral contact force, 21% less tibial contact force, 21% less graft tension than the AMP technique. Yet, the hybrid transtibial technique had 41% greater femoral contact force, 39% greater tibial contact force, 33% greater graft tension, and 6% greater graft von Mises stress than the transtibial technique. A similar trend was found for the anterior knee drawer test. At both 6-mm anterior tibial displacement and 11° knee flexion, the hybrid transtibial and AMP techniques had at least 51% more femoral contact area than the transtibial technique.
Conclusion: This finite element analysis highlights that the hybrid transtibial technique is a true hybrid between the AMP and transtibial techniques for femoral tunnel drilling regarding femoral tunnel length, graft bending angle, and peak graft stress.
{"title":"The Hybrid Transtibial Technique for Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis Model of Graft Bending Angles and Peak Graft Stresses in Comparison With Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.","authors":"Bryan M Saltzman, Shangcheng Wang, Nahir A Habet, Ian S Hong, David P Trofa, Joshua D Meade, James E Fleischli, Dana P Piasecki","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00883","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this finite element analysis was to compare femoral tunnel length; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft bending angle; and peak graft stress, contact force, and contact area created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal (AMP), and hybrid transtibial techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finite element analysis modeling was used to examine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction models based on transtibial, AMP, and hybrid transtibial femoral tunnel drilling techniques. An evaluation of femoral tunnel length, graft bending angle, peak graft stress, contact force, and contact area was done in comparison of these techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The femoral tunnel created with the hybrid transtibial technique was 45.3 mm, which was 13.3% longer than that achieved with the AMP technique but 15.2% shorter than that with the transtibial technique. The femoral graft bending angle with the hybrid transtibial technique (105°) was less acute than that with the AMP technique (102°), but more acute than that with the transtibial technique (109°). At 11° knee flexion, the hybrid transtibial technique had 22% less femoral contact force, 21% less tibial contact force, 21% less graft tension than the AMP technique. Yet, the hybrid transtibial technique had 41% greater femoral contact force, 39% greater tibial contact force, 33% greater graft tension, and 6% greater graft von Mises stress than the transtibial technique. A similar trend was found for the anterior knee drawer test. At both 6-mm anterior tibial displacement and 11° knee flexion, the hybrid transtibial and AMP techniques had at least 51% more femoral contact area than the transtibial technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This finite element analysis highlights that the hybrid transtibial technique is a true hybrid between the AMP and transtibial techniques for femoral tunnel drilling regarding femoral tunnel length, graft bending angle, and peak graft stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1195-e1206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40651690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15Epub Date: 2022-08-09DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00148
Andrew J Sheean, Brett D Owens, Bryson P Lesniak, Albert Lin
In recent years, an appreciation for the dynamic relationship between glenoid and humeral-sided bone loss and its importance to the pathomechanics of glenohumeral instability has substantially affected modern treatment algorithms. However, comparatively less attention has been paid to the influence of glenoid version on glenohumeral instability. Limited biomechanical data suggest that alterations in glenoid version may affect the forces necessary to destabilize the glenohumeral joint. However, this phenomenon has not been consistently corroborated by the results of clinical studies. Although increased glenoid retroversion may represent an independent risk factor for posterior glenohumeral instability, this relationship has not been reliably observed in the setting of anterior glenohumeral instability. Similarly, the effect of glenoid version on the failure rates of surgical stabilization procedures remains poorly understood.
{"title":"The Effect of Glenoid Version on Glenohumeral Instability.","authors":"Andrew J Sheean, Brett D Owens, Bryson P Lesniak, Albert Lin","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, an appreciation for the dynamic relationship between glenoid and humeral-sided bone loss and its importance to the pathomechanics of glenohumeral instability has substantially affected modern treatment algorithms. However, comparatively less attention has been paid to the influence of glenoid version on glenohumeral instability. Limited biomechanical data suggest that alterations in glenoid version may affect the forces necessary to destabilize the glenohumeral joint. However, this phenomenon has not been consistently corroborated by the results of clinical studies. Although increased glenoid retroversion may represent an independent risk factor for posterior glenohumeral instability, this relationship has not been reliably observed in the setting of anterior glenohumeral instability. Similarly, the effect of glenoid version on the failure rates of surgical stabilization procedures remains poorly understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1165-e1178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40377754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15Epub Date: 2022-05-24DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01018
David A Patch, Matthew C Hess, Clay A Spitler, Joey P Johnson
Traumatic hemipelvectomy (THP) is a catastrophic injury associated with high-energy trauma and high mortality. THP has been defined as a complete dislocation of the hemipelvis, often with disruption through the symphysis pubis and sacroiliac joint with concurrent traumatic rupture of the iliac vessels. Despite recent advances in prehospital resuscitative techniques, the true incidence of THP is difficult to ascertain because many patients die before hospital arrival. The leading causes of death associated with THP include blood loss, infection, and multiple system organ failure. Recognition and immediate intervention for these injuries is imperative for survival. The initial assessment includes a thorough physical examination assessing for signs of arterial damage and other associated injuries. Hemorrhage control and vigorous resuscitation should be prioritized to combat impending exsanguination. Emergent amputation has been found to be a lifesaving operation in these patients. The basis of this approach is rooted in achieving complete hemostasis while reducing complication rates. Understanding the nature of these massive pelvic injuries, the role of early amputation, and the importance of subspecialty communication can improve survivability and optimize patient outcomes.
{"title":"Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Hemipelvectomy.","authors":"David A Patch, Matthew C Hess, Clay A Spitler, Joey P Johnson","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic hemipelvectomy (THP) is a catastrophic injury associated with high-energy trauma and high mortality. THP has been defined as a complete dislocation of the hemipelvis, often with disruption through the symphysis pubis and sacroiliac joint with concurrent traumatic rupture of the iliac vessels. Despite recent advances in prehospital resuscitative techniques, the true incidence of THP is difficult to ascertain because many patients die before hospital arrival. The leading causes of death associated with THP include blood loss, infection, and multiple system organ failure. Recognition and immediate intervention for these injuries is imperative for survival. The initial assessment includes a thorough physical examination assessing for signs of arterial damage and other associated injuries. Hemorrhage control and vigorous resuscitation should be prioritized to combat impending exsanguination. Emergent amputation has been found to be a lifesaving operation in these patients. The basis of this approach is rooted in achieving complete hemostasis while reducing complication rates. Understanding the nature of these massive pelvic injuries, the role of early amputation, and the importance of subspecialty communication can improve survivability and optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"888-895"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40377752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-01Epub Date: 2022-05-06DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00172
Matthew H Lindsey, Grace X Xiong, Harry M Lightsey, Carew Giberson-Chen, Brian Goh, Raylin Fan Xu, Andrew K Simpson, Andrew J Schoenfeld
Introduction: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a complex medical condition with high morbidity and healthcare costs. Clinical presentation and laboratory data may have prognostic value in forecasting morbidity and mortality. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) demonstrates promise for the prediction of adverse events in multiple orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic surgical conditions. We investigated the relationship between CAR and outcomes after treatment of SEA.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated adult patients treated within a single healthcare system for a diagnosis of SEA (2005 to 2017). Laboratory and clinical data included age at diagnosis, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, history of intravenous drug use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and CAR. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any complication; mortality and readmissions were considered secondarily. We used logistic regression to determine the association between baseline CAR and outcomes, adjusting for confounders.
Results: We included 362 patients with a 90-day mortality rate of 13.3% and a 90-day complication rate of 47.8%. A reduced complication rate was observed in the lowest decile of CAR values compared with the remaining 90% of patients, a threshold value of 2.5 (27.0% versus 50.2%; odds ratio [OR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 5.81). CAR values in the highest two deciles experienced significantly increased odds of complications compared with the lowest decile (80th: OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.25 to 9.42; 90th: OR 3.28; 95% CI 1.19 to 9.04).
Discussion: We found elevated CAR to be associated with an increased likelihood of major morbidity in SEA. We suggest using a CAR value of 2.5 as a threshold for enhanced surveillance and recognizing patients with values above 73.7 as being at exceptional risk of morbidity.
Level of evidence: Level III observational cohort study.
脊髓硬膜外脓肿(SEA)是一种复杂的疾病,发病率高,医疗费用高。临床表现和实验室数据在预测发病率和死亡率方面可能具有预后价值。c反应蛋白与白蛋白比率(CAR)在预测多种骨科和非骨科手术条件下的不良事件方面表现出了希望。我们研究了CAR与SEA治疗后预后的关系。方法:我们回顾性评估了2005年至2017年在单一医疗保健系统内诊断为SEA的成年患者。实验室和临床资料包括诊断年龄、性别、种族、体重指数、吸烟状况、静脉用药史、Charlson合并症指数和CAR。主要结局是并发症的发生;死亡率和再入院是次要考虑的。我们使用逻辑回归来确定基线CAR与结果之间的关系,并对混杂因素进行调整。结果:我们纳入362例患者,90天死亡率为13.3%,90天并发症发生率为47.8%。与其余90%的患者相比,CAR值最低的十分之一患者的并发症发生率降低,阈值为2.5(27.0%对50.2%;优势比[OR] 2.66, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.22 ~ 5.81)。与最低十分位数相比,CAR值最高的两个十分位数发生并发症的几率显著增加(80:OR 3.44;95% CI 1.25 ~ 9.42;第90次:OR 3.28;95% CI 1.19 ~ 9.04)。讨论:我们发现CAR升高与SEA中主要发病的可能性增加有关。我们建议将CAR值为2.5作为加强监测的阈值,并将高于73.7的患者视为具有特殊的发病风险。证据水平:III级观察队列研究。
{"title":"C-reactive Protein-to-albumin Ratio in Spinal Epidural Abscess: Association with Post-treatment Complications.","authors":"Matthew H Lindsey, Grace X Xiong, Harry M Lightsey, Carew Giberson-Chen, Brian Goh, Raylin Fan Xu, Andrew K Simpson, Andrew J Schoenfeld","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a complex medical condition with high morbidity and healthcare costs. Clinical presentation and laboratory data may have prognostic value in forecasting morbidity and mortality. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) demonstrates promise for the prediction of adverse events in multiple orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic surgical conditions. We investigated the relationship between CAR and outcomes after treatment of SEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated adult patients treated within a single healthcare system for a diagnosis of SEA (2005 to 2017). Laboratory and clinical data included age at diagnosis, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, history of intravenous drug use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and CAR. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any complication; mortality and readmissions were considered secondarily. We used logistic regression to determine the association between baseline CAR and outcomes, adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 362 patients with a 90-day mortality rate of 13.3% and a 90-day complication rate of 47.8%. A reduced complication rate was observed in the lowest decile of CAR values compared with the remaining 90% of patients, a threshold value of 2.5 (27.0% versus 50.2%; odds ratio [OR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 5.81). CAR values in the highest two deciles experienced significantly increased odds of complications compared with the lowest decile (80th: OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.25 to 9.42; 90th: OR 3.28; 95% CI 1.19 to 9.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found elevated CAR to be associated with an increased likelihood of major morbidity in SEA. We suggest using a CAR value of 2.5 as a threshold for enhanced surveillance and recognizing patients with values above 73.7 as being at exceptional risk of morbidity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III observational cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"851-857"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40624784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-01Epub Date: 2022-03-31DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01155
Jose A Canseco, Arun P Kanhere, Gregory D Schroeder, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler
Discogenic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint in patients presenting to orthopaedic surgeons. In addition to surgical options, there are several nonsurgical intradiscal treatments that have gained interest, ranging from biologic, nonbiologic, cell-based, and molecular therapies. However, there is limited evidence for many of these techniques, and some are still in the clinical trial stage. We describe a broad overview of these intradiscal therapies, the mechanism of action, and the evidence behind them.
{"title":"Intradiscal Therapies for Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease.","authors":"Jose A Canseco, Arun P Kanhere, Gregory D Schroeder, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Discogenic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint in patients presenting to orthopaedic surgeons. In addition to surgical options, there are several nonsurgical intradiscal treatments that have gained interest, ranging from biologic, nonbiologic, cell-based, and molecular therapies. However, there is limited evidence for many of these techniques, and some are still in the clinical trial stage. We describe a broad overview of these intradiscal therapies, the mechanism of action, and the evidence behind them.</p>","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1084-e1094"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40624785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}