首页 > 最新文献

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Timed Up and Go in People with Subjective Cognitive Decline Is Associated with Faster Cognitive Deterioration and Cortical Thickness 主观认知能力下降的人与更快的认知退化和皮层厚度有关
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI: 10.1159/000522094
Miguel Germán Borda, D. Ferreira, P. Selnes, D. A. Tovar-Rios, A. Jaramillo-Jiménez, Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, E. Garcia-Cifuentes, Turi O. Dalaker, K. Oppedal, H. Sønnesyn, T. Fladby, D. Aarsland
Introduction: Early markers of neurodegeneration provide an opportunity to detect, monitor, and initiate interventions in individuals who have an increased risk of developing dementia. Here, we investigated whether the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is associated with early brain neurodegeneration and whether the TUG test could be a marker of cognitive decline in people with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Methods: This is a longitudinal analysis of the Dementia Disease Initiation Study, a prospective, community-based, cohort study from Norway, designed to investigate early markers of cognitive impairment and dementia. Participants were classified as SCD and healthy controls (HC). The main studied variables were the TUG test and cognition as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease memory composite score. Additionally, we investigated the cross-sectional association of brain morphology with the TUG using 1.5T-MRI. Results: The sample included 45 participants (SCD = 21, HC = 24) followed during a mean time of 1.50 ± 0.70 years. At baseline, the cognitive performance did not differ between the groups, but TUG was longer in SCD. Slower baseline TUG was associated with a faster cognitive decline in both groups and it was also associated with reduced cortical thickness especially in motor, executive, associative, and somatosensory cortical regions in people with SCD. Discussion/Conclusion: TUG predicted cognitive change in individuals with SCD, and there was a negative association between TUG and cortical thickness. TUG is a promising cheap and noninvasive marker of early cognitive decline and may help initiate interventions in individuals who have an increased risk of dementia.
引言:神经退行性变的早期标志物为检测、监测和开始干预痴呆风险增加的个体提供了机会。在这里,我们研究了定时上下运动(TUG)测试是否与早期大脑神经退行性变有关,以及TUG测试是否可以作为主观认知能力下降(SCD)患者认知能力下降的标志。方法:这是对痴呆症发病研究的纵向分析,这是一项来自挪威的前瞻性、基于社区的队列研究,旨在调查认知障碍和痴呆症的早期标志物。参与者被分为SCD和健康对照组(HC)。主要研究变量是TUG测试和认知,通过迷你精神状态检查和阿尔茨海默病记忆综合评分注册联合会进行测量。此外,我们使用1.5T-MRI研究了大脑形态与TUG的横断面关联。结果:样本包括45名参与者(SCD=21,HC=24),平均随访时间为1.50±0.70年。在基线时,两组之间的认知表现没有差异,但SCD的TUG更长。在两组中,基线TUG较慢与认知能力下降较快有关,也与皮层厚度减少有关,尤其是在SCD患者的运动、执行、联想和体感皮层区域。讨论/结论:TUG可预测SCD患者的认知变化,TUG与皮质厚度呈负相关。TUG是一种很有前途的廉价、无创的早期认知能力下降标志物,可能有助于对痴呆风险增加的个体进行干预。
{"title":"Timed Up and Go in People with Subjective Cognitive Decline Is Associated with Faster Cognitive Deterioration and Cortical Thickness","authors":"Miguel Germán Borda, D. Ferreira, P. Selnes, D. A. Tovar-Rios, A. Jaramillo-Jiménez, Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, E. Garcia-Cifuentes, Turi O. Dalaker, K. Oppedal, H. Sønnesyn, T. Fladby, D. Aarsland","doi":"10.1159/000522094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522094","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Early markers of neurodegeneration provide an opportunity to detect, monitor, and initiate interventions in individuals who have an increased risk of developing dementia. Here, we investigated whether the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is associated with early brain neurodegeneration and whether the TUG test could be a marker of cognitive decline in people with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Methods: This is a longitudinal analysis of the Dementia Disease Initiation Study, a prospective, community-based, cohort study from Norway, designed to investigate early markers of cognitive impairment and dementia. Participants were classified as SCD and healthy controls (HC). The main studied variables were the TUG test and cognition as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease memory composite score. Additionally, we investigated the cross-sectional association of brain morphology with the TUG using 1.5T-MRI. Results: The sample included 45 participants (SCD = 21, HC = 24) followed during a mean time of 1.50 ± 0.70 years. At baseline, the cognitive performance did not differ between the groups, but TUG was longer in SCD. Slower baseline TUG was associated with a faster cognitive decline in both groups and it was also associated with reduced cortical thickness especially in motor, executive, associative, and somatosensory cortical regions in people with SCD. Discussion/Conclusion: TUG predicted cognitive change in individuals with SCD, and there was a negative association between TUG and cortical thickness. TUG is a promising cheap and noninvasive marker of early cognitive decline and may help initiate interventions in individuals who have an increased risk of dementia.","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41564564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Therapeutic Touch in the Management of Responsive Behaviors in Patients with Dementia 治疗性触摸在痴呆患者反应行为管理中的作用
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI: 10.1159/000523752
H. Senderovich, Sandra Gardner, A. Berall, R. Shultz, Brenda Grant, Vincent Santaguida
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the use of therapeutic touch (TT) in the management of responsive behaviors in patients with dementia. Methods: A randomized, double-blinded control trial was used to compare response to TT in a population with responsive behaviors in dementia, in 3 phases, pretreatment, treatment, and posttreatment each lasting 5 days. The participants were divided into three groups: experimental, placebo, and control. The experimental group received regular TT, the placebo group received mimic TT, and the control group received regular routine care. Behavior was observed and recorded by trained research assistants every 20 min during the study time throughout each of the phases. Modified Agitated Behavior Rating Scale (ABRS) and Revised Memory and Behavior Check (RMBC) scores were used to assess the behavioral symptoms of dementia throughout the study. Results: All groups had decreasing RMBC scores during the pretreatment period, however; the experimental TT group was the only group whose RMBC scores continued to decrease during the treatment period. All groups had a similar pattern of rates of change in ABRS scores over the 15-day period, with no differential pattern of results related to experimental TT. Conclusion: Despite limited evidence, TT should be explored as an adjunctive therapy for reducing behavioral symptoms in individuals with dementia. Further research is needed to determine the effects of TT on responsive behaviors in dementia. There is a need for studies with larger sample sizes, equal distribution of participants between groups (in terms of dementia stages), and longer post study follow-ups.
本研究旨在探讨治疗性触摸(TT)在痴呆患者反应性行为管理中的应用。方法:采用随机双盲对照试验,分治疗前、治疗中和治疗后3个阶段,每个阶段持续5天,比较痴呆患者反应性行为人群对TT的反应。参与者被分为三组:实验组、安慰剂组和对照组。实验组给予常规TT治疗,安慰剂组给予模拟TT治疗,对照组给予常规护理。在每个阶段的研究期间,由训练有素的研究助理每20分钟观察和记录一次行为。在整个研究过程中,使用改进的激动行为评定量表(ABRS)和改进的记忆和行为检查(RMBC)评分来评估痴呆的行为症状。结果:预处理期间各组RMBC评分均有下降;实验TT组是唯一RMBC评分在治疗期间持续下降的组。所有组在15天内ABRS评分的变化率模式相似,与实验TT相关的结果没有差异模式。结论:尽管证据有限,但TT应该作为一种辅助治疗来减少痴呆患者的行为症状。需要进一步的研究来确定TT对痴呆患者反应性行为的影响。研究需要更大的样本量,各组之间参与者的均匀分布(就痴呆阶段而言),以及更长的研究后随访。
{"title":"Therapeutic Touch in the Management of Responsive Behaviors in Patients with Dementia","authors":"H. Senderovich, Sandra Gardner, A. Berall, R. Shultz, Brenda Grant, Vincent Santaguida","doi":"10.1159/000523752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000523752","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the use of therapeutic touch (TT) in the management of responsive behaviors in patients with dementia. Methods: A randomized, double-blinded control trial was used to compare response to TT in a population with responsive behaviors in dementia, in 3 phases, pretreatment, treatment, and posttreatment each lasting 5 days. The participants were divided into three groups: experimental, placebo, and control. The experimental group received regular TT, the placebo group received mimic TT, and the control group received regular routine care. Behavior was observed and recorded by trained research assistants every 20 min during the study time throughout each of the phases. Modified Agitated Behavior Rating Scale (ABRS) and Revised Memory and Behavior Check (RMBC) scores were used to assess the behavioral symptoms of dementia throughout the study. Results: All groups had decreasing RMBC scores during the pretreatment period, however; the experimental TT group was the only group whose RMBC scores continued to decrease during the treatment period. All groups had a similar pattern of rates of change in ABRS scores over the 15-day period, with no differential pattern of results related to experimental TT. Conclusion: Despite limited evidence, TT should be explored as an adjunctive therapy for reducing behavioral symptoms in individuals with dementia. Further research is needed to determine the effects of TT on responsive behaviors in dementia. There is a need for studies with larger sample sizes, equal distribution of participants between groups (in terms of dementia stages), and longer post study follow-ups.","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41868227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Homicide and Dementia: A Systematic Review 凶杀和痴呆:一项系统综述
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1159/000521878
Tali Elsayed Sundakov-Krumins, Sean Lubbe, A. Wand
Background: Homicide by older offenders is rare and devastating. It likely occurs due to a complex interaction of personal, social, and environmental factors. Dementia is a progressive neurological condition which may amplify behavioural disturbances such as aggression. This systematic review aims to evaluate the factors associated with homicide committed by people with dementia in order to inform clinical practice. Summary: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for empirical studies examining the characteristics and circumstances of people with dementia who committed homicides. Data on factors associated with the homicide were extracted and the quality of each study rated using standardized criteria. A total of 499 papers were screened and thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Study design included case reports (seven studies), case series (four studies), and two retrospective cohort studies, indicative of low levels of evidence. Sample sizes were 1–70. Study findings were predominantly descriptive. Quality ratings ranged from 50 to 100%. Factors associated with disinhibition such as dysexecutive syndrome, alcohol use, and delirium may predispose to severe impulsive aggression. Psychosis and personality pathology appeared to influence targeted assaults resulting in homicide by people with dementia. Victim vulnerability was also a key element. Key Messages: The current evidence examining risk factors for homicide committed by people with dementia is limited. However, there are common characteristics reported in these descriptive studies including psychiatric factors and cognitive states causing disinhibition. Recommendations for clinical practice include early assessment of older people with dementia and changed behaviours to allow management of comorbidities and reversible risk factors, alongside education, and advice to carers (who may be targets of aggression). Specialized geriatric forensic psychiatry services and care settings should be developed.
背景:年长罪犯的凶杀案非常罕见,而且具有毁灭性。它可能是由于个人、社会和环境因素的复杂相互作用而发生的。痴呆症是一种渐进性神经疾病,可能会加剧攻击性等行为障碍。这项系统综述旨在评估痴呆症患者杀人的相关因素,为临床实践提供信息。摘要:根据PRISMA指南搜索MEDLINE、PsychINFO、Embase和PubMed数据库,以进行实证研究,检查杀人的痴呆症患者的特征和情况。提取了与凶杀案相关的因素数据,并使用标准化标准对每项研究的质量进行了评级。共筛选了499篇论文,13项研究符合入选标准。研究设计包括病例报告(七项研究)、病例系列(四项研究)和两项回顾性队列研究,表明证据水平较低。样本量为1–70。研究结果主要是描述性的。质量评级从50%到100%不等。与去抑制相关的因素,如执行障碍综合征、饮酒和谵妄,可能会导致严重的冲动攻击。精神病和人格病理学似乎影响了痴呆症患者的针对性攻击,导致其杀人。受害者的脆弱性也是一个关键因素。关键信息:目前研究痴呆症患者杀人风险因素的证据有限。然而,在这些描述性研究中报告了一些共同的特征,包括导致去抑制的精神因素和认知状态。临床实践建议包括对患有痴呆症和行为改变的老年人进行早期评估,以便对合并症和可逆风险因素进行管理,同时对护理人员(可能是攻击目标)进行教育和建议。应当发展专门的老年法医精神病学服务和护理环境。
{"title":"Homicide and Dementia: A Systematic Review","authors":"Tali Elsayed Sundakov-Krumins, Sean Lubbe, A. Wand","doi":"10.1159/000521878","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000521878","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Homicide by older offenders is rare and devastating. It likely occurs due to a complex interaction of personal, social, and environmental factors. Dementia is a progressive neurological condition which may amplify behavioural disturbances such as aggression. This systematic review aims to evaluate the factors associated with homicide committed by people with dementia in order to inform clinical practice. Summary: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for empirical studies examining the characteristics and circumstances of people with dementia who committed homicides. Data on factors associated with the homicide were extracted and the quality of each study rated using standardized criteria. A total of 499 papers were screened and thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Study design included case reports (seven studies), case series (four studies), and two retrospective cohort studies, indicative of low levels of evidence. Sample sizes were 1–70. Study findings were predominantly descriptive. Quality ratings ranged from 50 to 100%. Factors associated with disinhibition such as dysexecutive syndrome, alcohol use, and delirium may predispose to severe impulsive aggression. Psychosis and personality pathology appeared to influence targeted assaults resulting in homicide by people with dementia. Victim vulnerability was also a key element. Key Messages: The current evidence examining risk factors for homicide committed by people with dementia is limited. However, there are common characteristics reported in these descriptive studies including psychiatric factors and cognitive states causing disinhibition. Recommendations for clinical practice include early assessment of older people with dementia and changed behaviours to allow management of comorbidities and reversible risk factors, alongside education, and advice to carers (who may be targets of aggression). Specialized geriatric forensic psychiatry services and care settings should be developed.","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42516601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Adaptation and Validation of the Person-Centred Assessment Tool for the Acute Care Setting 以人为中心的评估工具在急性护理环境中的适应性和验证
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1159/000522325
C. Cheong, Felicia Hui En Tay, P. Yap
Introduction: Person-centred care (PCC) is synonymous with best practice in the care of persons with dementia. Despite this, PCC is not routinely assessed, and there is no validated tool for in the acute care setting. We aimed to validate the Person-Centred Assessment Tool (P-CAT) in an acute setting. Methods: P-CAT was administered independently to a total of 161 nurses (n = 16, from a specialized dementia unit with PCC training; n = 116, geriatric wards; n = 30, medical/surgical wards). The word “residents” was replaced with “patients” in P-CAT. We employed confirmatory factor analysis with principal component extraction to verify the previously reported three- and two-factor solutions. A one-way between-groups ANOVA was then used to investigate group differences in the P-CAT score (total scale and subscale). Results: Factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution (explained variance 42.28%): (i) extent of personalizing care and (ii) amount of organizational and environmental support. Out of the 13 items, only 2 items did not load as expected. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was satisfactory (Cronbach’s α = 0.77). Nurses’ P-CAT scores were significantly different across ward settings [Welch’s F(2,37.20) = 13.01, p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.09], with the highest among those PCC trained. Post hoc analyses revealed a significant difference in mean subscale scores between PCC-trained nurses and nurses from the other two ward settings. P-CAT scores were not significantly correlated with age, r(159) = 0.01, p = 0.861, or with nursing experience, r(159) = 0.04, p = 0.615. Discussion/Conclusion: P-CAT possesses adequate validity and reliability as a quantitative assessment tool of PCC in the acute care setting.
导言:以人为本的护理(PCC)是痴呆症患者护理最佳实践的代名词。尽管如此,PCC并没有被常规评估,在急性护理环境中也没有有效的工具。我们的目的是在急性环境中验证以人为本的评估工具(P-CAT)。方法:对接受过PCC培训的痴呆专科病房的161名护士(n = 16)单独实施P-CAT;老年病房116例;N = 30,内科/外科病房)。P-CAT中的“residents”一词被替换为“patients”。我们采用验证性因子分析与主成分提取来验证先前报道的三因素和两因素解决方案。然后使用单因素组间方差分析来调查P-CAT评分(总量表和子量表)的组间差异。结果:因子分析结果显示:(i)个性化护理程度和(ii)组织和环境支持量为双因素解决方案(解释方差为42.28%)。在13个项目中,只有2个项目没有按预期加载。量表的内部一致性信度令人满意(Cronbach’s α = 0.77)。不同病区护士p - cat得分差异有统计学意义[Welch’s F(2,37.20) = 13.01, p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.09],其中PCC训练组得分最高。事后分析显示,接受过pcc培训的护士和其他两个病房的护士在平均分量表得分上有显著差异。p - cat评分与年龄无显著相关,r(159) = 0.01, p = 0.861;与护理经验无显著相关,r(159) = 0.04, p = 0.615。讨论/结论:P-CAT作为急性护理环境中PCC的定量评估工具具有足够的效度和信度。
{"title":"Adaptation and Validation of the Person-Centred Assessment Tool for the Acute Care Setting","authors":"C. Cheong, Felicia Hui En Tay, P. Yap","doi":"10.1159/000522325","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522325","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Person-centred care (PCC) is synonymous with best practice in the care of persons with dementia. Despite this, PCC is not routinely assessed, and there is no validated tool for in the acute care setting. We aimed to validate the Person-Centred Assessment Tool (P-CAT) in an acute setting. Methods: P-CAT was administered independently to a total of 161 nurses (n = 16, from a specialized dementia unit with PCC training; n = 116, geriatric wards; n = 30, medical/surgical wards). The word “residents” was replaced with “patients” in P-CAT. We employed confirmatory factor analysis with principal component extraction to verify the previously reported three- and two-factor solutions. A one-way between-groups ANOVA was then used to investigate group differences in the P-CAT score (total scale and subscale). Results: Factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution (explained variance 42.28%): (i) extent of personalizing care and (ii) amount of organizational and environmental support. Out of the 13 items, only 2 items did not load as expected. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was satisfactory (Cronbach’s α = 0.77). Nurses’ P-CAT scores were significantly different across ward settings [Welch’s F(2,37.20) = 13.01, p < 0.001, ω2 = 0.09], with the highest among those PCC trained. Post hoc analyses revealed a significant difference in mean subscale scores between PCC-trained nurses and nurses from the other two ward settings. P-CAT scores were not significantly correlated with age, r(159) = 0.01, p = 0.861, or with nursing experience, r(159) = 0.04, p = 0.615. Discussion/Conclusion: P-CAT possesses adequate validity and reliability as a quantitative assessment tool of PCC in the acute care setting.","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43664382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantitative and Qualitative Differences of Action Verbal Fluency between Young and Older Adults 青年和老年人动作语言流畅性的数量和质量差异
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1159/000519070
Soomin Kim, H. Jang, Sou Jin Choi, Hyung-Ji Kim, Jae-Hong Lee, M. Kwon
Introduction: Action verbal fluency (AVF) task, a word fluency test, involves language and executive function and is known to be sensitive to fronto-striatal degeneration. However, the ability may also decrease qualitatively as well as quantitatively in normal aging. The objective of this study is to investigate the age-related quantitative and qualitative differences in AVF of Korean adults. Methods: We analyzed data from 78 participants of 40 young (mean age = 28.9) and 38 older adults (mean age = 67.7). The correct responses in the AVF task were measured for quantitative analysis. Qualitatively, the mean number of arguments required by each verb was calculated for syntactic analysis. For semantic analysis, we subclassified verbs according to their characteristics (e.g., moment vs. non-moment verbs/active vs. non-active verbs) and calculated the ratio for comparison. The results of AVF were also compared to those of semantic/phonemic fluency and the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-K). Results: The older group showed quantitatively lower performance in AVF than the young group (p < 0.01). The result of the AVF task significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with both semantic/phonemic fluency and the MoCA-K. Also, the older group produced syntactically more simple verbs than the counterpart (p < 0.01). In the semantic analysis, the older group produced fewer moment verbs (p < 0.05) but more non-moment verbs (p < 0.05) than the young group. There was no difference in active or non-active verbs between two groups. Conclusion: These results indicated that the ability of AVF declines with age not only quantitatively but also qualitatively in relation to their cognitive changes.
动作语言流畅性(AVF)任务是一种涉及语言和执行功能的单词流畅性测试,已知对额纹状体变性敏感。然而,在正常的衰老过程中,这种能力也可能在数量和质量上下降。本研究的目的是探讨韩国成人AVF的年龄相关的定量和定性差异。方法:我们分析了78名参与者的资料,其中40名年轻人(平均年龄28.9岁)和38名老年人(平均年龄67.7岁)。测量AVF任务的正确反应进行定量分析。定性地,计算每个动词所需的平均参数数以进行句法分析。在语义分析方面,我们根据动词的特征(例如,时刻动词与非时刻动词/主动动词与非主动动词)对动词进行了细分,并计算了比例进行比较。并将AVF测试结果与语义/音位流畅性测试结果和蒙特利尔认知测试(MoCA-K)的韩国版结果进行了比较。结果:老年组AVF的定量表现低于年轻组(p < 0.01)。AVF任务的结果与语义/音位流畅性和MoCA-K均显著相关(p < 0.01)。此外,年龄较大的一组比另一组产生更多语法上简单的动词(p < 0.01)。在语义分析中,老年组产生的瞬间动词比年轻组少(p < 0.05),而产生的非瞬间动词比年轻组多(p < 0.05)。两组在主动动词和非主动动词上没有差异。结论:随着年龄的增长,AVF能力不仅在数量上下降,而且在质量上也与认知变化有关。
{"title":"Quantitative and Qualitative Differences of Action Verbal Fluency between Young and Older Adults","authors":"Soomin Kim, H. Jang, Sou Jin Choi, Hyung-Ji Kim, Jae-Hong Lee, M. Kwon","doi":"10.1159/000519070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519070","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Action verbal fluency (AVF) task, a word fluency test, involves language and executive function and is known to be sensitive to fronto-striatal degeneration. However, the ability may also decrease qualitatively as well as quantitatively in normal aging. The objective of this study is to investigate the age-related quantitative and qualitative differences in AVF of Korean adults. Methods: We analyzed data from 78 participants of 40 young (mean age = 28.9) and 38 older adults (mean age = 67.7). The correct responses in the AVF task were measured for quantitative analysis. Qualitatively, the mean number of arguments required by each verb was calculated for syntactic analysis. For semantic analysis, we subclassified verbs according to their characteristics (e.g., moment vs. non-moment verbs/active vs. non-active verbs) and calculated the ratio for comparison. The results of AVF were also compared to those of semantic/phonemic fluency and the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-K). Results: The older group showed quantitatively lower performance in AVF than the young group (p < 0.01). The result of the AVF task significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with both semantic/phonemic fluency and the MoCA-K. Also, the older group produced syntactically more simple verbs than the counterpart (p < 0.01). In the semantic analysis, the older group produced fewer moment verbs (p < 0.05) but more non-moment verbs (p < 0.05) than the young group. There was no difference in active or non-active verbs between two groups. Conclusion: These results indicated that the ability of AVF declines with age not only quantitatively but also qualitatively in relation to their cognitive changes.","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45600537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Blood Biomarkers of Neuronal/Axonal and Glial Injury in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders. 人类免疫缺陷病毒相关神经认知障碍中神经元/轴突和神经胶质损伤的血液生物标志物
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-06 DOI: 10.1159/000527659
Natalia P Rocha, Antonio L Teixeira, Gabriela D Colpo, Michelle A Babicz, Jennifer L Thompson, Steven Paul Woods

Introduction: Approximately half of the people living with HIV (PLWH) experience HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HANDs). However, the neuropathogenesis of HAND is complex, and identifying reliable biomarkers has been challenging.

Methods: This study included 132 participants aged 50 and older from greater San Diego County. The participants were divided into three groups: PLWH with HAND (n = 29), PLWH without HAND (n = 73), and seronegatives without cognitive impairment (n = 30). Peripheral blood was collected at the clinical assessment, and plasma levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL), phosphorylated Tau 181 (pTau181), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results: Plasma levels of NfL (but not pTau181 and GFAP) were significantly associated with HAND at a medium effect size (p = 0.039, Cohen's d = 0.45 for HAND + vs. HAND-). Notably, higher levels of NfL were significantly associated with HAND diagnosis even after adjusting for sex.

Discussion: Our data suggest that neuronal degeneration (as evidenced by increased levels of NfL), but not tau pathology or glial degeneration, is related to cognitive status in PLWH. Our results corroborate the view that blood NfL is a promising biomarker of cognitive impairment in PLWH.

导言:大约一半的艾滋病病毒感染者(PLWH)会出现艾滋病相关神经认知障碍(HANDs)。然而,HAND 的神经发病机制十分复杂,确定可靠的生物标志物一直是一项挑战:这项研究包括来自大圣迭戈县的 132 名 50 岁及以上的参与者。参与者分为三组:患有手足口病的 PLWH(29 人)、无手足口病的 PLWH(73 人)和无认知障碍的血清阴性者(30 人)。临床评估时采集外周血,并通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血浆中神经丝蛋白轻链(NfL)、磷酸化 Tau 181(pTau181)和神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)的水平:结果:血浆中NfL(而非pTau181和GFAP)水平与HAND有显著相关性,影响程度为中等(P = 0.039,HAND + vs. HAND-的Cohen's d = 0.45)。值得注意的是,即使在调整了性别因素后,较高水平的NfL仍与HAND诊断显著相关:我们的数据表明,神经元变性(NfL水平升高证明了这一点)与PLWH的认知状况有关,但与tau病理学或神经胶质变性无关。我们的研究结果证实,血液中的NfL有望成为检测PLWH认知障碍的生物标志物。
{"title":"Blood Biomarkers of Neuronal/Axonal and Glial Injury in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders.","authors":"Natalia P Rocha, Antonio L Teixeira, Gabriela D Colpo, Michelle A Babicz, Jennifer L Thompson, Steven Paul Woods","doi":"10.1159/000527659","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000527659","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Approximately half of the people living with HIV (PLWH) experience HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HANDs). However, the neuropathogenesis of HAND is complex, and identifying reliable biomarkers has been challenging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 132 participants aged 50 and older from greater San Diego County. The participants were divided into three groups: PLWH with HAND (n = 29), PLWH without HAND (n = 73), and seronegatives without cognitive impairment (n = 30). Peripheral blood was collected at the clinical assessment, and plasma levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL), phosphorylated Tau 181 (pTau181), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Plasma levels of NfL (but not pTau181 and GFAP) were significantly associated with HAND at a medium effect size (p = 0.039, Cohen's d = 0.45 for HAND + vs. HAND-). Notably, higher levels of NfL were significantly associated with HAND diagnosis even after adjusting for sex.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our data suggest that neuronal degeneration (as evidenced by increased levels of NfL), but not tau pathology or glial degeneration, is related to cognitive status in PLWH. Our results corroborate the view that blood NfL is a promising biomarker of cognitive impairment in PLWH.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992101/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9196910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Care Needs Profiles and Their Association with Caregiver Strain among Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment. 社区居住的老年认知障碍患者的护理需求概况及其与照顾者压力的关系。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000525999
Pildoo Sung, Angelique Wei-Ming Chan

Introduction: This study examined distinct profiles of met and unmet care needs among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment and their association with caregiver strain.

Methods: Latent class analysis and multivariable regression were applied to data from 266 caregivers of older Singaporeans, aged 60 years and above, with cognitive impairment. Care needs were evaluated by caregivers using the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. Caregiver strain was measured by the Zarit Burden Interview.

Results: Four need profiles were identified: (1) no need (38% of caregivers), (2) met social and memory needs (29%), (3) no social and met memory needs (17%), and (4) unmet social and memory needs (16%). The unmet social and memory needs profile was associated with a higher level of caregiver strain, compared to the no need profile.

Discussion: A person-centered approach captured heterogeneity in the care needs of community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment. Policymakers should develop tailored interventions based on need profiles that may help reduce caregiver strain.

简介:本研究调查了社区居住的认知障碍老年人满足和未满足的护理需求的不同概况及其与照顾者压力的关系。方法:对266名60岁及以上认知障碍的新加坡老年人护理人员进行潜在分类分析和多变量回归分析。护理人员使用Camberwell老年人需求评估来评估护理需求。通过Zarit负担访谈测量照顾者压力。结果:(1)不需要(38%),(2)满足社会和记忆需求(29%),(3)没有社会和满足记忆需求(17%),(4)未满足社会和记忆需求(16%)。与不需要的情况相比,未满足社会和记忆需求的情况与更高水平的照顾者压力有关。讨论:以人为中心的方法捕获了社区居住的认知障碍老年人护理需求的异质性。决策者应根据需求概况制定量身定制的干预措施,这可能有助于减少照顾者的压力。
{"title":"Care Needs Profiles and Their Association with Caregiver Strain among Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Pildoo Sung,&nbsp;Angelique Wei-Ming Chan","doi":"10.1159/000525999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525999","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined distinct profiles of met and unmet care needs among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment and their association with caregiver strain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Latent class analysis and multivariable regression were applied to data from 266 caregivers of older Singaporeans, aged 60 years and above, with cognitive impairment. Care needs were evaluated by caregivers using the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. Caregiver strain was measured by the Zarit Burden Interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four need profiles were identified: (1) no need (38% of caregivers), (2) met social and memory needs (29%), (3) no social and met memory needs (17%), and (4) unmet social and memory needs (16%). The unmet social and memory needs profile was associated with a higher level of caregiver strain, compared to the no need profile.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A person-centered approach captured heterogeneity in the care needs of community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment. Policymakers should develop tailored interventions based on need profiles that may help reduce caregiver strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9198647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment of Behavior in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech and Agrammatic Aphasia. 原发性进行性言语失用和语法失语症行为的横断面和纵向评估。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000524474
Fatma Ozlem Hokelekli, Joseph R Duffy, Heather M Clark, Rene L Utianski, Hugo Botha, Julie A Stierwalt, Edythe A Strand, Mary M Machulda, Jennifer L Whitwell, Keith A Josephs

Introduction: Progressive agrammatic aphasia (PAA) can be associated with abnormal behaviors; however, it is unknown whether behaviors occur and/or are different in patients with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). We aimed to compare baseline and longitudinal behavioral symptomatology between PPAOS, patients with PAA, and patients with both apraxia of speech and PAA (AOS-PAA).

Methods: We recruited 89 patients for this study, 40 with PPAOS, 11 with PAA, and 38 with AOS-PAA. Behavioral disturbances were evaluated using the frontal behavior inventory (FBI) which was also split into negative behaviors and disinhibition, and the 20-item behavioral assessment scale (20-BAS). Data analysis was performed using linear regression and linear mixed models.

Results: Of the 89 patients in the study, 54% were women and the mean age at onset was 68 years. All patients, regardless of diagnosis, endorsed at least one symptom on the FBI at baseline, most frequently verbal apraxia (100%), logopenia (95.6%), irritability (55.9%), and apathy (42.6%). On the 20-BAS, 47.6% of the patients endorsed at least one symptom, most commonly "crying more easily" (19.5%) and personality change (18.3%). PPAOS was the least behaviorally affected group, with differences between PPAOS and AOS-PAA mainly driven by negative behaviors as opposed to disinhibition for PPAOS and PAA. The behavioral metrics showed average sensitivity and specificity to distinguish between groups. Behavioral disturbances worsened over time although rate of behavioral change across groups was similar.

Conclusion: Behavioral disturbances are more common and severe in patients with agrammatic aphasia with or without AOS compared to patients with isolated apraxia of speech.

进行性语法性失语(PAA)可与异常行为相关;然而,尚不清楚原发性进行性言语失用症(PPAOS)患者的行为是否发生和/或不同。我们的目的是比较PPAOS、PAA患者和同时患有言语失用和PAA的患者(AOS-PAA)的基线和纵向行为症状。方法:本研究共招募89例患者,其中40例为PPAOS, 11例为PAA, 38例为AOS-PAA。采用正面行为量表(FBI)和20项行为评定量表(20-BAS)对行为障碍进行评估。数据分析采用线性回归和线性混合模型。结果:89例患者中,54%为女性,平均发病年龄为68岁。所有患者,无论诊断如何,在基线时至少有一种FBI症状,最常见的是语言失用症(100%),注意力缺失(95.6%),易怒(55.9%)和冷漠(42.6%)。在20-BAS中,47.6%的患者承认至少有一种症状,最常见的是“更容易哭”(19.5%)和性格改变(18.3%)。PPAOS是行为受影响最小的组,PPAOS和AOS-PAA之间的差异主要是由消极行为驱动的,而不是PPAOS和PAA的去抑制。行为指标在区分组间表现出平均的敏感性和特异性。行为障碍随着时间的推移而恶化,尽管两组之间的行为改变率相似。结论:与单纯言语失用患者相比,伴有或不伴有AOS的语法失语症患者的行为障碍更为常见和严重。
{"title":"Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment of Behavior in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech and Agrammatic Aphasia.","authors":"Fatma Ozlem Hokelekli,&nbsp;Joseph R Duffy,&nbsp;Heather M Clark,&nbsp;Rene L Utianski,&nbsp;Hugo Botha,&nbsp;Julie A Stierwalt,&nbsp;Edythe A Strand,&nbsp;Mary M Machulda,&nbsp;Jennifer L Whitwell,&nbsp;Keith A Josephs","doi":"10.1159/000524474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000524474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Progressive agrammatic aphasia (PAA) can be associated with abnormal behaviors; however, it is unknown whether behaviors occur and/or are different in patients with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). We aimed to compare baseline and longitudinal behavioral symptomatology between PPAOS, patients with PAA, and patients with both apraxia of speech and PAA (AOS-PAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 89 patients for this study, 40 with PPAOS, 11 with PAA, and 38 with AOS-PAA. Behavioral disturbances were evaluated using the frontal behavior inventory (FBI) which was also split into negative behaviors and disinhibition, and the 20-item behavioral assessment scale (20-BAS). Data analysis was performed using linear regression and linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 89 patients in the study, 54% were women and the mean age at onset was 68 years. All patients, regardless of diagnosis, endorsed at least one symptom on the FBI at baseline, most frequently verbal apraxia (100%), logopenia (95.6%), irritability (55.9%), and apathy (42.6%). On the 20-BAS, 47.6% of the patients endorsed at least one symptom, most commonly \"crying more easily\" (19.5%) and personality change (18.3%). PPAOS was the least behaviorally affected group, with differences between PPAOS and AOS-PAA mainly driven by negative behaviors as opposed to disinhibition for PPAOS and PAA. The behavioral metrics showed average sensitivity and specificity to distinguish between groups. Behavioral disturbances worsened over time although rate of behavioral change across groups was similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Behavioral disturbances are more common and severe in patients with agrammatic aphasia with or without AOS compared to patients with isolated apraxia of speech.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9190067/pdf/nihms-1801194.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9406627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Normative Data of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Taiwan. 台湾社区居住老年人精神状态测验、蒙特娄认知评量与阿尔茨海默病评量量表-认知子量表之规范资料。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000525615
Yi-Chia Wei, Chih-Ken Chen, Chemin Lin, Pin-Yuan Chen, Pei-Chun Hsu, Ching-Po Lin, Yu-Chiau Shyu, Wen-Yi Huang

Introduction: Appropriate tools and references are essential for evaluating individuals' cognitive levels. This study validated the Taiwan version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and provided normative data for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and ADAS-cog in community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog were administered to 150 nondemented healthy adults aged 55-85 years during 2018-2020 as part of the Northeastern Taiwan Community Medicine Research Cohort. ADAS-cog was translated from the original English version to traditional Chinese with cultural and language considerations in Taiwan. Cronbach's alpha (α) tested the reliability of ADAS-cog, and Pearson correlations examined its external validity using MMSE and MoCA as comparisons. Normative data were generated and stratified by age and education, and the one-way analysis of variance compared scores between age and education groups. Another 20 hospital-acquired participants with cognitive impairment joined the 150 healthy participants. Comparisons in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) tiers tested the discriminability of the tests for different cognitive levels. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyzed the power of ADAS-cog in predicting CDR 0.5 from CDR 0.

Results: The Taiwan version of ADAS-cog had fair reliability between items (α = 0.727) and good correlations to MMSE (r = -0.673, p < 0.001) and MoCA (r = -0.746, p < 0.001). The normative data of MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog showed ladder changes with age (p = 0.006, 0.001, and 0.437) and education (p < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001) in the 150 nondemented older adults. Next, in the 170 mixed participants from the communities and the hospital, MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog scores were well differentiable between CDR 0, 0.5, and 1. In addition, ADAS-cog discriminated CDR 0.5 from 0 by an AUROC of 0.827 (p < 0.001).

Discussion/conclusion: The three structured cognitive tests consistently reflect cognitive levels of healthy older adults. The Taiwan version of ADAS-cog is compatible with MMSE and MoCA to distinguish people with mildly impaired from normal cognition. In addition, this study derived MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog norms tailored to demographic factors. The findings highlight the need for stratification of age and education rather than applying a fixed cutoff for defining normal and abnormal cognition.

适当的工具和参考文献是评估个体认知水平的必要条件。本研究验证台湾版阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知子量表(ADAS-cog),并为社区居住老年人的迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和ADAS-cog提供规范性数据。方法:作为台湾东北社区医学研究队列的一部分,在2018-2020年期间,对150名55-85岁的无痴呆健康成人进行MMSE、MoCA和ADAS-cog治疗。考虑到台湾的文化和语言因素,ADAS-cog从原来的英文版本翻译成繁体中文。Cronbach’s alpha (α)检验ADAS-cog的信度,Pearson相关检验其外部效度,采用MMSE和MoCA作为比较。生成规范数据并按年龄和教育程度分层,并进行单向方差分析,比较年龄和教育程度组之间的得分。另外20名医院获得性认知障碍的参与者加入了150名健康参与者的行列。临床痴呆评分(CDR)等级的比较测试了不同认知水平测试的可辨别性。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分析了ADAS-cog从CDR 0预测CDR 0.5的能力。结果:台湾版ADAS-cog量表单项间具有较好的信度(α = 0.727),与MMSE (r = -0.673, p < 0.001)和MoCA (r = -0.746, p < 0.001)具有较好的相关性。MMSE、MoCA和ADAS-cog的规范性数据随年龄(p = 0.006、0.001和0.437)和教育程度(p < 0.001)呈阶梯变化。讨论/结论:三种结构化认知测试一致反映健康老年人的认知水平。台湾版ADAS-cog与MMSE及MoCA相容,可区分轻度认知障碍者与正常认知障碍者。此外,本研究还根据人口统计因素推导出MMSE、MoCA和ADAS-cog规范。研究结果强调了年龄和教育分层的必要性,而不是应用一个固定的界限来定义正常和异常的认知。
{"title":"Normative Data of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Taiwan.","authors":"Yi-Chia Wei,&nbsp;Chih-Ken Chen,&nbsp;Chemin Lin,&nbsp;Pin-Yuan Chen,&nbsp;Pei-Chun Hsu,&nbsp;Ching-Po Lin,&nbsp;Yu-Chiau Shyu,&nbsp;Wen-Yi Huang","doi":"10.1159/000525615","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appropriate tools and references are essential for evaluating individuals' cognitive levels. This study validated the Taiwan version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and provided normative data for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and ADAS-cog in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog were administered to 150 nondemented healthy adults aged 55-85 years during 2018-2020 as part of the Northeastern Taiwan Community Medicine Research Cohort. ADAS-cog was translated from the original English version to traditional Chinese with cultural and language considerations in Taiwan. Cronbach's alpha (α) tested the reliability of ADAS-cog, and Pearson correlations examined its external validity using MMSE and MoCA as comparisons. Normative data were generated and stratified by age and education, and the one-way analysis of variance compared scores between age and education groups. Another 20 hospital-acquired participants with cognitive impairment joined the 150 healthy participants. Comparisons in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) tiers tested the discriminability of the tests for different cognitive levels. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyzed the power of ADAS-cog in predicting CDR 0.5 from CDR 0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Taiwan version of ADAS-cog had fair reliability between items (α = 0.727) and good correlations to MMSE (r = -0.673, p < 0.001) and MoCA (r = -0.746, p < 0.001). The normative data of MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog showed ladder changes with age (p = 0.006, 0.001, and 0.437) and education (p < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001) in the 150 nondemented older adults. Next, in the 170 mixed participants from the communities and the hospital, MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog scores were well differentiable between CDR 0, 0.5, and 1. In addition, ADAS-cog discriminated CDR 0.5 from 0 by an AUROC of 0.827 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The three structured cognitive tests consistently reflect cognitive levels of healthy older adults. The Taiwan version of ADAS-cog is compatible with MMSE and MoCA to distinguish people with mildly impaired from normal cognition. In addition, this study derived MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog norms tailored to demographic factors. The findings highlight the need for stratification of age and education rather than applying a fixed cutoff for defining normal and abnormal cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677874/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10623057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Utilization of Dental Care and the Incidence of Dementia: A Longitudinal Study of an Older Japanese Cohort. 牙科保健的利用和痴呆的发病率:一项对日本老年队列的纵向研究。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000526683
Mizuki Saito, Yoshihiro Shimazaki, Toshiya Nonoyama, Kazushi Ohsugi

Introduction: A relationship between periodontal disease and dementia has been reported. It is important to visit a dentist to maintain healthy periodontal tissue. Few studies have been reported on the association between dental visits and the risk of dementia. This study examined the relationship between the use of dental care among older people and the incidence of dementia based on health insurance claims data.

Materials and methods: We targeted 31,775 people aged 75 or 80 years. Dental utilization was obtained from the health insurance claims data from April 2014 to March 2015. The month when dementia medical costs were first incurred during the 4-year follow-up period was defined as the dementia onset month. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the incidence of dementia for the use of dental care.

Results: Regarding the type of dental visit, the adjusted HR of overall dementia was significantly lower (0.89: 95% CI, 0.81-0.98) in those who received periodontal treatment compared with those who did not receive any dental treatment. Regarding the days of periodontal treatment, participants with ≥5 days had significantly lower adjusted HRs for overall dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia than those with 0 days, and the adjusted HRs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-1.00), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69-0.99), respectively.

Conclusion: Individuals who received periodontal treatment on many days had a low risk of dementia. Regular dental visits to treat or prevent periodontal disease may be important to prevent dementia.

导读:牙周病和痴呆之间的关系已被报道。去看牙医对保持牙周组织健康很重要。很少有关于看牙医与患痴呆症风险之间关系的研究报道。本研究基于健康保险索赔数据,调查了老年人使用牙科护理与痴呆症发病率之间的关系。材料和方法:研究对象为31775名年龄在75 - 80岁之间的老年人。从2014年4月至2015年3月的医疗保险索赔数据中获得牙科利用情况。在4年随访期间,首次发生痴呆医疗费用的月份被定义为痴呆发病月份。使用Cox比例风险模型来估计使用牙科护理的痴呆发病率的风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:在牙科就诊类型方面,接受牙周治疗的患者总体痴呆的调整HR明显低于未接受牙周治疗的患者(0.89:95% CI, 0.81-0.98)。在牙周治疗天数方面,接受≥5天牙周治疗的受试者总体痴呆、阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆的调整hr显著低于接受0天牙周治疗的受试者,调整hr分别为0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94)、0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-1.00)和0.82 (95% CI, 0.69-0.99)。结论:多天接受牙周治疗的人患痴呆的风险较低。定期去看牙医以治疗或预防牙周病可能对预防痴呆很重要。
{"title":"Utilization of Dental Care and the Incidence of Dementia: A Longitudinal Study of an Older Japanese Cohort.","authors":"Mizuki Saito,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Shimazaki,&nbsp;Toshiya Nonoyama,&nbsp;Kazushi Ohsugi","doi":"10.1159/000526683","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A relationship between periodontal disease and dementia has been reported. It is important to visit a dentist to maintain healthy periodontal tissue. Few studies have been reported on the association between dental visits and the risk of dementia. This study examined the relationship between the use of dental care among older people and the incidence of dementia based on health insurance claims data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We targeted 31,775 people aged 75 or 80 years. Dental utilization was obtained from the health insurance claims data from April 2014 to March 2015. The month when dementia medical costs were first incurred during the 4-year follow-up period was defined as the dementia onset month. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the incidence of dementia for the use of dental care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the type of dental visit, the adjusted HR of overall dementia was significantly lower (0.89: 95% CI, 0.81-0.98) in those who received periodontal treatment compared with those who did not receive any dental treatment. Regarding the days of periodontal treatment, participants with ≥5 days had significantly lower adjusted HRs for overall dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia than those with 0 days, and the adjusted HRs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-1.00), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69-0.99), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals who received periodontal treatment on many days had a low risk of dementia. Regular dental visits to treat or prevent periodontal disease may be important to prevent dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10630218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1