Dermatology and Therapy最新文献

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic condition with an increasing incidence in Japan. Difamilast and delgocitinib are both new topical drugs for AD proven to be efficacious and safe in phases 2 and 3 clinical trials in Japan. However, there are no head-to-head trials comparing their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients by severity and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of difamilast with delgocitinib among patients with moderate-to-severe AD using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

Methods: Phase 3 clinical trials of difamilast and delgocitinib for treating AD were included. The trials had similar designs but differed in baseline population characteristics. Anchored MAIC was used to align the baseline characteristics and calculate clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was to determine severity stages of the proportion of patients with AD through Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), while the secondary outcome included comparing other clinical efficacy and safety of difamilast with delgocitinib.

Results: A total of 340 patients were selected (170 each received difamilast and placebo) from the difamilast trial, with 158 (106 received delgocitinib; 52 received placebo) from the delgocitinib trial for the analysis. After matching patients from the difamilast trial with those from the delgocitinib trial, the effective sample sizes (ESS) reduced to 32.7-43.3% of the original difamilast (treatment/placebo) patients. At week 4, the ESS in the difamilast group demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the distribution of AD severity stages, as per EASI scores, compared with the delgocitinib group. In addition, no significant differences were found in modified EASI (mEASI) scores, mEASI 50 and 75 scores, and safety outcomes between the two treatments.

Conclusions: The anchored MAIC analysis indicates that difamilast treatment, like delgocitinib, is a useful option for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD in Japan.

Introduction: Historically, patients with skin of color are underdiagnosed with psoriasis and underrepresented in clinical trials. In this study, we assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by race and ethnicity in the open label extension LIMMitless (NCT03047395).

Methods: Patients received continuous treatment with 150 mg risankizumab through their initial trial and the open label extension. Patients self-identified their race and ethnicity. Efficacy was assessed using Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Safety is reported by events/100 patient-years.

Results: A total of 897 patients (race: 662 White, 196 Asian, 25 Black or African American, 14 Other; ethnicity: 98 Hispanic or Latino, 799 non-Hispanic or Latino) were included in this analysis. Compared to baseline, patients had a mean percent reduction in PASI between 94.6% (Asian) and 99.3% (Black or African American) and reported mean percent improvements in DLQI ranging from 87.1% (Asian and Black or African American) to 93.7% (Hispanic or Latino) at week 100.

Conclusion: While the data presented here comprise a small retrospective descriptive analysis and cannot detect statistical differences, efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis appears similar across the racial and ethnic groups studied and no new safety signals were detected.

Introduction: Rapid progress made in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) in recent years and the differences in patient journey between Asian and non-Asian populations call for a review of current atopic dermatitis landscape in Asia.

Methods: A roundtable meeting with nine regional dermatological experts was held in June 2023 to discuss the optimal management approaches for moderate-to-severe AD, focusing on the use of advanced therapies.

Results: Disease burden on patients' quality of life, treatment adherence, and financial constraints were identified as major concerns when managing patients with moderate-to-severe AD in parts of Asia. It was agreed that the Hanifin and Rajka's criteria or the UK Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis can be used to guide the clinical diagnosis of AD. Meanwhile, patient-reported outcome scales including the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool can be used alongside depression monitoring scales to monitor treatment outcomes in patients with AD, allowing a better understanding for individualized treatment. When managing moderate-to-severe AD, phototherapy should be attempted after failure with topical treatments, followed by conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and, subsequently, biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors. Systemic corticosteroids can be used as short-term therapy for acute flares. Although these advanced treatments are known to be effective, physicians have to take into consideration safety concerns and limitations when prescribing these treatments.

Conclusions: Treatments in AD have evolved and its management varies country by country. Unique challenges across Asian countries necessitate a different management approach in Asian patients with AD.

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, inflammatory skin disease associated with a high disease burden and long diagnostic delay. Prevalence estimates of HS vary widely in the literature owing to differing estimation methodologies. This study aimed to apply stepwise algorithms to estimate the prevalence of possible/diagnosed cases of HS in the US.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study in adult and pediatric patients with HS which utilized data from four US databases (MarketScan [Medicare and Medicaid] and Optum [electronic health record (EHR) and Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM)]). Patients with possible/diagnosed HS were identified using two algorithms (termed Algorithm 1 and Algorithm 2), which assessed symptoms such as multiple skin boils in site-specific areas based on international classification of disease (ICD) codes. Patients with diagnosed HS were defined as having ≥ 2 outpatient or ≥ 1 inpatient diagnosis codes of HS. In each database, patients with continuous medical and pharmacy benefits in the 365 days pre-index and 0-365 days post-index periods were eligible for inclusion.

Results: Across all databases, Algorithm 2 (MarketScan Medicare [N = 309,916]; MarketScan Medicaid [N = 188,783]; Optum EHR [N = 366,158]; Optum CDM [N = 173,812]) identified more patients with possible/diagnosed HS than Algorithm 1 (MarketScan Medicare [N = 194,353]; MarketScan Medicaid [N = 99,276]; Optum EHR [N = 177,957]; Optum CDM [N = 112,244]). Based on ICD-9/10 codes, the 5-year period prevalence of HS ranged from 0.06% to 0.12% across all databases, while for Algorithm 1 and Algorithm 2, this ranged from 0.27% to 0.41% and 0.49% to 0.78%, respectively. Adults and females generally had a higher 5-year period prevalence versus pediatric patients and males, respectively.

Conclusion: This real-world study highlights that HS diagnosis codes alone may be insufficient to estimate the prevalence of HS, demonstrating the value of employing algorithms in practice which assess for parameters such as multiple skin boils in site-specific areas. Integrating robust methods to identify the prevalence of HS may improve the diagnostic delay observed in HS and improve treatment outcomes.

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated skin disease with several comorbidities and a considerable influence on quality of life. Many patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis are undertreated and have a substantial disease duration before effective treatment is started. This study analyzed patient and disease characteristics and time to effective treatment of patients with psoriasis who consulted PsoPlus. It also examined whether a treat-to-target (T2T) approach, which is implemented in PsoPlus, has an impact on treatment choice and disease progression.

Methods: Through a single center, retrospective study, 170 patients in the PsoPlus dedicated clinic were compared at moment of enrollment in PsoPlus and at the last recorded consultation in 2021.

Results: Median disease duration at the first PsoPlus consultation was 16.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 19.0) years. There was a significant difference in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) between the first and the last recorded PsoPlus consultation (PASI 6.0 (IQR 6.4) vs. 0.6 (IQR 2.6); DLQI 11 (IQR 11) vs. 2 (IQR 6); p < 0.001). A weak positive Spearman correlation (r_s) was found between disease duration and PASI at the first PsoPlus consultation (r_s = 0.175; p = 0.034), while a weak negative correlation (r_s = - 0.2; p = 0.013) was found at the last registered PsoPlus consultation. Patients with a disease duration of more than 20 years had significantly more switches of treatment than those with a shorter disease duration (p < 0.001). Median time from psoriasis onset until PASI ≤ 2 was 16.0 years. Median time from the first PsoPlus consultation until PASI ≤ 2 was 7.0 months.

Conclusion: The PsoPlus program with its T2T approach effectively improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with psoriasis in a relatively short period, emphasizing the value of a structured, personalized treatment plan for long-term management.

Introduction: Acne remains one of the most common inflammatory dermatoses seen worldwide. There are significant challenges when managing acne relating to a variety of factors, including (1) lack of consensus on the use of the numerous available grading systems and outcome measures, (2) appreciation of the numerous areas that relate to severity, (3) the chronic nature of acne which requires a longitudinal approach to management (including both facial and truncal disease), and (4) the need to target acne early to avoid physical and psychosocial scarring. Consideration of these aspects when managing acne should result in improved outcomes. Acne guidelines review the available evidence based on robust clinical trials and are usually supplemented with some expert opinion when evidence is not available.

Methods: In this paper, the UK Acne Working Group reflects on the latest National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) acne guidelines with a goal of providing additional practical insights.

Conclusion: The group have identified areas where new evidence has now become available since the formulation of the NICE acne guidelines. This publication considers newly approved acne medications in the UK, guidance on assessing acne severity, approaches to managing truncal acne, acne sequelae, and adult female acne with hormonal therapies.

Vorasidenib, an oral dual inhibitor targeting mutant enzymes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2, is utilized in the management of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Despite limited documentation of its adverse events, we present the case of a 44-year-old male who exhibited trichomegaly and hypertrichosis of body hair, eyebrows, and eyelashes following one month of vorasidenib treatment. Notably, the patient experienced diffuse hair regrowth on the scalp, including in areas affected by severe androgenetic alopecia. This report holds significance as it highlights a previously unreported side effect, thereby enhancing our understanding of emerging therapies for brain tumors and their associated adverse reactions.