Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-15DOI: 10.1159/000537805
Eve K Abernethy, Emad H Aly
Background: Postoperative ileus (POI) is one of the most common postoperative complications after colorectal surgery and prolongs hospital stays. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has reduced POI, but it remains common. This review explores the current methods for preventing and managing POI after MIS.
Summary: Preoperative interventions, including optimising nutrition, preoperative medicationn, and mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, may have a role in preventing POI. Transversus abdominis plane blocks and lidocaine could replace epidural analgesia in MIS. Fluid overload should be avoided; in some cases, goal-directed fluid therapy may aid in achieving this. Pharmacological agents, such as prucalopride and dexmedetomidine, could target mechanisms underlying POI. New strategies to stimulate vagal nerve activity may promote postoperative gastrointestinal motility. Preoperative bowel stimulation could potentially reduce POI following loop ileostomy closure. However, the evidence base for several interventions remains weak and requires further corroboration with robust studies.
Key messages: Despite the increasing use of MIS, POI remains a major issue following colorectal surgery. Further strategies to prevent POI are rapidly emerging. Studies using standardised definitions and perioperative care will help validate these interventions and remove barriers to accurate meta-analysis. Future studies should focus on establishing the impact of these interventions on POI after MIS specifically.
背景术后回肠梗阻(POI)是结直肠手术后最常见的术后并发症之一,会延长住院时间。微创手术(MIS)减少了术后回肠梗阻的发生,但仍很常见。本综述探讨了目前预防和控制 MIS 术后 POI 的方法。摘要 术前干预,包括运动计划和口服抗生素的机械性肠道准备(MBP),对预防 POI 有一定作用。腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)和利多卡因可取代 MIS 中的硬膜外镇痛。应避免液体过量,在某些情况下,目标导向液体疗法可能有助于实现这一目标。普鲁卡必利(prucalopride)和右美托咪定(dexmedetomidine)等药理药剂可针对 POI 的潜在机制。刺激迷走神经活动的新策略可促进术后胃肠道蠕动。术前肠道刺激有可能减少环状回肠造口术闭合后的 POI。然而,几种干预措施的证据基础仍然薄弱,需要通过可靠的研究进一步证实。关键信息 尽管 MIS 的使用越来越多,但 POI 仍是结直肠手术后的一个主要问题。预防 POI 的进一步策略正在迅速出现。采用标准化定义和围手术期护理的研究将有助于验证这些干预措施,并消除准确荟萃分析的障碍。未来的研究应侧重于确定这些干预措施对 MIS 术后 POI 的具体影响。
{"title":"Postoperative Ileus after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Summary of Current Strategies for Prevention and Management.","authors":"Eve K Abernethy, Emad H Aly","doi":"10.1159/000537805","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000537805","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative ileus (POI) is one of the most common postoperative complications after colorectal surgery and prolongs hospital stays. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has reduced POI, but it remains common. This review explores the current methods for preventing and managing POI after MIS.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Preoperative interventions, including optimising nutrition, preoperative medicationn, and mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, may have a role in preventing POI. Transversus abdominis plane blocks and lidocaine could replace epidural analgesia in MIS. Fluid overload should be avoided; in some cases, goal-directed fluid therapy may aid in achieving this. Pharmacological agents, such as prucalopride and dexmedetomidine, could target mechanisms underlying POI. New strategies to stimulate vagal nerve activity may promote postoperative gastrointestinal motility. Preoperative bowel stimulation could potentially reduce POI following loop ileostomy closure. However, the evidence base for several interventions remains weak and requires further corroboration with robust studies.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Despite the increasing use of MIS, POI remains a major issue following colorectal surgery. Further strategies to prevent POI are rapidly emerging. Studies using standardised definitions and perioperative care will help validate these interventions and remove barriers to accurate meta-analysis. Future studies should focus on establishing the impact of these interventions on POI after MIS specifically.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"79-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11025667/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139740620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: We aimed to identify objective factors associated with failure of nonoperative management (NOM) of gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforation (GDUP) and establish a scoring model for early identification of patients in whom NOM of GDUP may fail.
Methods: A total of 71 patients with GDUP were divided into NOM (cases of NOM success) and operation groups (cases requiring emergency operation or conversion from NOM to operation). Using logistic regression analysis, a scoring model was established based on the independent factors. The patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the scores.
Results: Of the 71 patients, 18 and 53 were in the NOM and operation groups, respectively. Ascites in the pelvic cavity on computed tomography (CT) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at admission were identified as independent factors for NOM failure. The scoring model was established based on the presence of ascites in the pelvic cavity on CT and SOFA score ≥2 at admission. The operation rates for GDUP were 28.6% and 86.0% in the low-risk (score, 0) and high-risk groups (scores, 2 and 4), respectively.
Conclusion: Our scoring model may help determine NOM failure or success in patients with GDUP and make decisions regarding initial treatment.
{"title":"Early Identification of Patients with Potential Failure of Nonoperative Management for Gastroduodenal Peptic Ulcer Perforation.","authors":"Toshimichi Kobayashi, Satoshi Tabuchi, Itsuki Koganezawa, Masashi Nakagawa, Kei Yokozuka, Shigeto Ochiai, Takahiro Gunji, Yosuke Ozawa, Toru Sano, Koichi Tomita, Naokazu Chiba, Eiji Hidaka, Shigeyuki Kawachi","doi":"10.1159/000535520","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000535520","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to identify objective factors associated with failure of nonoperative management (NOM) of gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforation (GDUP) and establish a scoring model for early identification of patients in whom NOM of GDUP may fail.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 71 patients with GDUP were divided into NOM (cases of NOM success) and operation groups (cases requiring emergency operation or conversion from NOM to operation). Using logistic regression analysis, a scoring model was established based on the independent factors. The patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 71 patients, 18 and 53 were in the NOM and operation groups, respectively. Ascites in the pelvic cavity on computed tomography (CT) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at admission were identified as independent factors for NOM failure. The scoring model was established based on the presence of ascites in the pelvic cavity on CT and SOFA score ≥2 at admission. The operation rates for GDUP were 28.6% and 86.0% in the low-risk (score, 0) and high-risk groups (scores, 2 and 4), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our scoring model may help determine NOM failure or success in patients with GDUP and make decisions regarding initial treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138440449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-13DOI: 10.1159/000535753
Luke Traeger, Nagendra Dudi-Venkata, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Hidde M Kroon, James W Moore, Tarik Sammour
Introduction: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a significant complication following abdominal surgery, increasing morbidity and mortality. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory response is one of the major pathways involved in developing POI, but current recommendations to prevent POI do not target this. This review aims to summarise evidence for the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, neostigmine and pyridostigmine, to reduce the time to return of gastrointestinal function (GI) following abdominal surgery.
Methods: A systematic search of various databases was performed from 1946 to May 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in intra-abdominal surgery were included. Data on time to flatus and/or stool and side effects were extracted.
Results: Among 776 screened manuscripts, 8 RCTs (703 patients) investigating acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in intra-abdominal surgery were analysed. Five studies showed a significant reduction in time to flatus and/or stool by 17-47.6 h. Methodological variations, differing procedure types, and potential bias were observed. Limited studies reported side effects or length of stay.
Conclusion: Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may reduce the time for GI to return. However, current evidence is limited and biased. Further studies incorporating acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in an enhanced recovery protocol are required to address this question, especially for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
{"title":"Use of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Reducing Time to Gastrointestinal Function Recovery following Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Luke Traeger, Nagendra Dudi-Venkata, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Hidde M Kroon, James W Moore, Tarik Sammour","doi":"10.1159/000535753","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000535753","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative ileus (POI) is a significant complication following abdominal surgery, increasing morbidity and mortality. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory response is one of the major pathways involved in developing POI, but current recommendations to prevent POI do not target this. This review aims to summarise evidence for the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, neostigmine and pyridostigmine, to reduce the time to return of gastrointestinal function (GI) following abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of various databases was performed from 1946 to May 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in intra-abdominal surgery were included. Data on time to flatus and/or stool and side effects were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 776 screened manuscripts, 8 RCTs (703 patients) investigating acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in intra-abdominal surgery were analysed. Five studies showed a significant reduction in time to flatus and/or stool by 17-47.6 h. Methodological variations, differing procedure types, and potential bias were observed. Limited studies reported side effects or length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may reduce the time for GI to return. However, current evidence is limited and biased. Further studies incorporating acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in an enhanced recovery protocol are required to address this question, especially for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"12-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10946644/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138800984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-17DOI: 10.1159/000540214
Jingpu Wang, Eline M de Groot, Zhouqiao Wu, Rob H A Verhoeven, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Stella Mook, Lucas Goense, Sheraz R Markar, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg
Introduction: The optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer is controversial and varies internationally. This study aimed to describe treatment and survival of patients with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer in the Netherlands.
Methods: Patients staged with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer who were registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) were included. All patients were categorized by the treatment modality received. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival of them.
Results: Between 2015 and 2020, 286 patients with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer were included. Treatment consisted of preoperative chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy followed by surgery (8%), chemoradiotherapy alone (35%), chemotherapy alone (6%), radiotherapy alone (19%), and best supportive care (32%). The median follow-up was 28.1 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of each group were 82%, 58%, 49% for preoperative therapy plus surgery; 53%, 27%, 16% for chemoradiotherapy only; 13%, 0%, 0% for chemotherapy only; 13%, 0%, 0% for radiotherapy only; and 5%, 0%, 0% for best supportive care.
Conclusion: In a selected group of patients, preoperative therapy followed by esophagectomy may lead to improved survival, which is comparable to patients with <cT4bM0 tumors. Therefore, reevaluation following chemo(radio)therapy is recommended in these patients to evaluate the possibility of additional surgical resection.
{"title":"Evaluation of Treatment Strategies and Survival of Patients with cT4bM0 Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Jingpu Wang, Eline M de Groot, Zhouqiao Wu, Rob H A Verhoeven, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Stella Mook, Lucas Goense, Sheraz R Markar, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg","doi":"10.1159/000540214","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer is controversial and varies internationally. This study aimed to describe treatment and survival of patients with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients staged with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer who were registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) were included. All patients were categorized by the treatment modality received. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival of them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2020, 286 patients with cT4bM0 esophageal cancer were included. Treatment consisted of preoperative chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy followed by surgery (8%), chemoradiotherapy alone (35%), chemotherapy alone (6%), radiotherapy alone (19%), and best supportive care (32%). The median follow-up was 28.1 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of each group were 82%, 58%, 49% for preoperative therapy plus surgery; 53%, 27%, 16% for chemoradiotherapy only; 13%, 0%, 0% for chemotherapy only; 13%, 0%, 0% for radiotherapy only; and 5%, 0%, 0% for best supportive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a selected group of patients, preoperative therapy followed by esophagectomy may lead to improved survival, which is comparable to patients with <cT4bM0 tumors. Therefore, reevaluation following chemo(radio)therapy is recommended in these patients to evaluate the possibility of additional surgical resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"171-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1159/000540256
Juliana Jee, Lauren Vourneen O'Connell, Ishapreet Kaur, Shaheel Mohammad Sahebally
Introduction: Although effective, conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy (CEH) is associated with significant postoperative pain. Novel techniques such as transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) are suggested to reduce pain but may result in higher recurrence rates. We aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of CEH and THD in the present meta-analysis.
Methods: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 1995 to December 2022. The primary objective was recurrence. Secondary objectives included complication rates, length of stay (LOS), operative time, and time to return to baseline. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Subgroup analysis was also performed.
Results: A total of 6 RCTs encompassing 465 patients were captured. There were 142 (59%) males in the CEH group and 129 (54%) in the THD group. On random-effects analysis, THD had a higher recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-7.38, p = 0.04) albeit a shorter return to baseline compared to CEH (mean difference = -14.05 days, 95% CI = -20.38 to -7.72, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in bleeding (p = 0.12), urinary retention (p = 0.97), incontinence (p = 0.41), anal stenosis (p = 0.19), thrombosed residual haemorrhoids (p = 0.16), operating time (p = 0.19), or LOS (p = 0.22). Results remained similar on subgroup analysis.
Conclusions: CEH is associated with lower recurrence but similar complication rates to THD, although patients take longer to return to baseline function postoperatively.
{"title":"Conventional Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy versus Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialization for Haemorrhoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Juliana Jee, Lauren Vourneen O'Connell, Ishapreet Kaur, Shaheel Mohammad Sahebally","doi":"10.1159/000540256","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although effective, conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy (CEH) is associated with significant postoperative pain. Novel techniques such as transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) are suggested to reduce pain but may result in higher recurrence rates. We aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of CEH and THD in the present meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 1995 to December 2022. The primary objective was recurrence. Secondary objectives included complication rates, length of stay (LOS), operative time, and time to return to baseline. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Subgroup analysis was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 RCTs encompassing 465 patients were captured. There were 142 (59%) males in the CEH group and 129 (54%) in the THD group. On random-effects analysis, THD had a higher recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-7.38, p = 0.04) albeit a shorter return to baseline compared to CEH (mean difference = -14.05 days, 95% CI = -20.38 to -7.72, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in bleeding (p = 0.12), urinary retention (p = 0.97), incontinence (p = 0.41), anal stenosis (p = 0.19), thrombosed residual haemorrhoids (p = 0.16), operating time (p = 0.19), or LOS (p = 0.22). Results remained similar on subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEH is associated with lower recurrence but similar complication rates to THD, although patients take longer to return to baseline function postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"204-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141859329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1159/000541085
Sameh Hany Emile, Giovanna Dasilva, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Mariana Berho, Steven D Wexner
Introduction: We assessed the association between increased body mass index (BMI) and rectal cancer outcomes.
Methods: We included patients who underwent surgery for stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who were divided according to BMI at diagnosis: ideal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and increased BMI (≥25 kg/m2). Groups were compared using univariate association analyses relative to baseline characteristics, pathologic outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Main outcome measures involved circumferential resection margin (CRM), pathologic TNM stage, total mesorectal incision (TME) grade, OS, and DFS.
Results: 243 patients (64.6% male; median age 59 years) with a median BMI of 26.3 kg/m2 were included. 62.1% had BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Increased BMI patients had similar proportions of males (66.9% vs. 60.9%; p = 0.407) and comorbidities (ASA III: 47% vs. 37.4%; p = 0.24) to ideal BMI patients. There were no significant differences in cN1-2 stage (p = 0.279) or positive CRM (p = 0.062) rates. The groups had similar complete/near-complete TME, pathologic TN stage, and survival rates. Pathologic and survival outcomes were also similar with a BMI cutoff of 30.
Conclusions: There was a trend toward more nodal involvement in preoperative assessment and less CRM involvement in the final pathology of patients with increased BMI. Complete/near-complete TME and survival rates were comparable between the groups.
简介:我们评估了体重指数(BMI)增加与直肠癌预后之间的关系:我们评估了体重指数(BMI)增加与直肠癌预后之间的关系:我们纳入了接受手术治疗的 I-III 期直肠腺癌患者,并根据诊断时的体重指数对其进行了划分:理想体重指数(18.5-24.9 kg/m2)和增加体重指数(≥25 kg/m2)。通过单变量关联分析比较了各组的基线特征、病理结果、总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。主要结果指标包括周缘切除缘(CRM)、病理TNM分期、总直肠间膜切口(TME)分级、OS和DFS。结果:共纳入243例患者(64.6%为男性;中位年龄59岁),中位体重指数(BMI)为26.3 kg/m2。62.1%的患者体重指数≥25 kg/m2。与理想体重指数患者相比,体重指数增加患者的男性比例(66.9% vs 60.9%;P=0.407)和合并症比例(ASA III:47% vs 37.4%;P=0.24)相似。cN1-2 期(p=0.279)或 CRM 阳性率(p=0.062)无明显差异。两组患者的完全/接近完全TME、病理TN分期和生存率相似。以 BMI 30.为界限,病理和生存结果也相似:结论:在术前评估中,BMI 增加的患者有更多结节受累的趋势,而在最终病理结果中,CRM 受累较少。两组患者的完全/近完全TME和生存率相当。
{"title":"Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer and Increased Body Mass Index.","authors":"Sameh Hany Emile, Giovanna Dasilva, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Mariana Berho, Steven D Wexner","doi":"10.1159/000541085","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000541085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed the association between increased body mass index (BMI) and rectal cancer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients who underwent surgery for stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who were divided according to BMI at diagnosis: ideal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and increased BMI (≥25 kg/m2). Groups were compared using univariate association analyses relative to baseline characteristics, pathologic outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Main outcome measures involved circumferential resection margin (CRM), pathologic TNM stage, total mesorectal incision (TME) grade, OS, and DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>243 patients (64.6% male; median age 59 years) with a median BMI of 26.3 kg/m2 were included. 62.1% had BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Increased BMI patients had similar proportions of males (66.9% vs. 60.9%; p = 0.407) and comorbidities (ASA III: 47% vs. 37.4%; p = 0.24) to ideal BMI patients. There were no significant differences in cN1-2 stage (p = 0.279) or positive CRM (p = 0.062) rates. The groups had similar complete/near-complete TME, pathologic TN stage, and survival rates. Pathologic and survival outcomes were also similar with a BMI cutoff of 30.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a trend toward more nodal involvement in preoperative assessment and less CRM involvement in the final pathology of patients with increased BMI. Complete/near-complete TME and survival rates were comparable between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"194-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1159/000539460
Tommaso Giuliani, Eva Montalvá, Javier Maupoey, Andrea Boscá, Ana Hernando, David Calatayud, Vicente Navarro, Angel Rubín, Carmen Vinaixa, Rafael López-Andújar
Introduction: The multiparametric nature of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) still leads to uncertainty with its practical management. This study aims to characterize the main posttransplant recurrence patterns of HCC and to explore the therapeutic modalities targeting recurrence.
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent LT for HCC at a single tertiary center were analyzed. The time from first recurrence to death was investigated for each site of presentation. The impact of each recurrence-targeted treatment on survival was studied.
Results: Of 660 patients with HCC, any recurrence occurred in 96 (15.4%) patients with a median time to recurrence of 20.0 months (95% CI: 15.6-23.8). Patients recurred across different patters including solitary distant locations (30.8%, n = 28), liver only (24.2%, n = 22), lung (18.7%, n = 17), multi-organ disease (17.6%, n = 16), and bone (8.8%, n = 8). Multi-organ and bone recurrences had the poorest survival, while solitary distant lesions and pulmonary recurrences had the best outcomes. Each treatment modality carried a distinctive survival.
Conclusions: Patients recurred across 3 patterns with different prognostic implications. The benefit of each treatment option on distinct recurrence patterns appears to be influenced by the biological behavior inherent in the recurrence pattern itself.
结构式摘要 引言:肝移植(LT)后肝细胞癌(HCC)复发的多参数特性仍导致其实际治疗的不确定性。本研究旨在描述 HCC 移植后的主要复发模式,并探讨针对复发的治疗方法:方法:分析了在一家三级中心接受LT治疗的HCC连续患者。对每个发病部位从首次复发到死亡的时间进行了调查。研究了每种针对复发的治疗方法对生存率的影响:在660名HCC患者中,96名(15.4%)患者出现复发,中位复发时间为20.0个月(95% CI 15.6-23.8)。患者的复发模式各不相同,包括单发远处复发(30.8%,n=28)、仅肝脏复发(24.2%,n=22)、肺复发(18.7%,n=17)、多器官疾病复发(17.6%,n=16)和骨复发(8.8%,n=8)。多器官和骨复发的生存率最差,而单发远处病灶和肺复发的生存率最好。每种治疗方式都有不同的生存率:患者的复发有三种模式,对预后的影响各不相同。每种治疗方案对不同复发模式的益处似乎受到复发模式本身固有的生物学行为的影响。
{"title":"Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: Clinical Patterns and Hierarchy of Salvage Treatments.","authors":"Tommaso Giuliani, Eva Montalvá, Javier Maupoey, Andrea Boscá, Ana Hernando, David Calatayud, Vicente Navarro, Angel Rubín, Carmen Vinaixa, Rafael López-Andújar","doi":"10.1159/000539460","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000539460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The multiparametric nature of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) still leads to uncertainty with its practical management. This study aims to characterize the main posttransplant recurrence patterns of HCC and to explore the therapeutic modalities targeting recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent LT for HCC at a single tertiary center were analyzed. The time from first recurrence to death was investigated for each site of presentation. The impact of each recurrence-targeted treatment on survival was studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 660 patients with HCC, any recurrence occurred in 96 (15.4%) patients with a median time to recurrence of 20.0 months (95% CI: 15.6-23.8). Patients recurred across different patters including solitary distant locations (30.8%, n = 28), liver only (24.2%, n = 22), lung (18.7%, n = 17), multi-organ disease (17.6%, n = 16), and bone (8.8%, n = 8). Multi-organ and bone recurrences had the poorest survival, while solitary distant lesions and pulmonary recurrences had the best outcomes. Each treatment modality carried a distinctive survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients recurred across 3 patterns with different prognostic implications. The benefit of each treatment option on distinct recurrence patterns appears to be influenced by the biological behavior inherent in the recurrence pattern itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"181-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-07-18DOI: 10.1159/000540181
Ming Cui, Ya Hu, Bang Zheng, Tianqi Chen, Menghua Dai, Junchao Guo, Taiping Zhang, Jun Yu, Quan Liao, Yupei Zhao
Introduction: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is an important precursor lesion of pancreatic cancer. Systemic inflammatory parameters are widely used in the prognosis prediction of cancer; however, their prognostic implications in IPMN with associated invasive carcinoma (IPMN-INV) are unclear. This study aims to explore the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory parameters in patients with IPMN-INV.
Methods: From 2015 to 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed IPMN who underwent surgical resection at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. The clinical, radiological, and pathological data of the enrolled patients were collected and analyzed. Preoperative systemic inflammatory parameters were calculated as previously reported.
Results: Eighty-six patients with IPMN-INV met the inclusion criteria. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was the only systemic inflammatory parameter independently associated with the cancer-specific survival (CSS). An LMR higher than 3.5 was significantly associated with a favorable CSS in univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 0.305, p = 0.003) and multivariate analyses (HR 0.221, p = 0.001). Other independently prognostic factors included the presence of clinical symptoms, cyst size, N stage, and tumor differentiation. Additionally, a model including LMR was established for the prognosis prediction of IPMN-INV and had a C-index of 0.809.
Conclusions: Preoperative LMR could serve as a feasible prognostic biomarker for IPMN-INV. A decreased LMR (cutoff value of 3.5) was an independent predictor of poor survival for IPMN-INV.
{"title":"Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Survival for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm with Associated Invasive Carcinoma of the Pancreas: Results from a High-Volume Center.","authors":"Ming Cui, Ya Hu, Bang Zheng, Tianqi Chen, Menghua Dai, Junchao Guo, Taiping Zhang, Jun Yu, Quan Liao, Yupei Zhao","doi":"10.1159/000540181","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is an important precursor lesion of pancreatic cancer. Systemic inflammatory parameters are widely used in the prognosis prediction of cancer; however, their prognostic implications in IPMN with associated invasive carcinoma (IPMN-INV) are unclear. This study aims to explore the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory parameters in patients with IPMN-INV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2015 to 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed IPMN who underwent surgical resection at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. The clinical, radiological, and pathological data of the enrolled patients were collected and analyzed. Preoperative systemic inflammatory parameters were calculated as previously reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients with IPMN-INV met the inclusion criteria. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was the only systemic inflammatory parameter independently associated with the cancer-specific survival (CSS). An LMR higher than 3.5 was significantly associated with a favorable CSS in univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 0.305, p = 0.003) and multivariate analyses (HR 0.221, p = 0.001). Other independently prognostic factors included the presence of clinical symptoms, cyst size, N stage, and tumor differentiation. Additionally, a model including LMR was established for the prognosis prediction of IPMN-INV and had a C-index of 0.809.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative LMR could serve as a feasible prognostic biomarker for IPMN-INV. A decreased LMR (cutoff value of 3.5) was an independent predictor of poor survival for IPMN-INV.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"111-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382638/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141562935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-08DOI: 10.1159/000535588
Noel Cassar, Paul Cromwell, Sinead Duggan, Charlotte van Veldhuisen, Marja Boermeester, Marc Besselink, Kevin Conlon
Background: Debate exists regarding the optimal treatment for painful chronic pancreatitis (CP). This meta-analysis aims to determine the outcomes of surgical intervention as compared to endoscopy in patients with painful CP.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Databases (1995 onwards) was done by two independent reviewers using PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome was pain relief.
Results: Among 8,479 studies, three were randomized trials, comprising a total of 199 patients. Compared with endoscopy, surgery was associated with a lower Izbicki score, both at medium term (mean difference (MD) 21.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.48-29.43, p < 0.00001) and long term (MD: 17.80, 95% CI: 8.36-27.23, p = 0.0002). A higher proportion of surgical patients had some sort of pain relief compared with those who had endoscopy, both at medium term (72% vs. 46%, RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.90, p = 0.0006) and long term (73% vs. 47%, RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.19-1.89, p = 0.0007). Complete pain relief was more common in the surgical group compared to the endoscopy group, both at medium term (33% vs. 17%, RR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.16-3.36, p = 0.01) and long term (35% vs. 18%, RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.15-3.20, p = 0.01). The pooled crossover rate from endoscopy to surgery was 22% (22/99).
Conclusions: Surgical treatment in patients with painful CP leads to better pain control, requiring fewer interventions as compared to endoscopic treatment.
{"title":"Surgery versus Endoscopy for the Management of Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.","authors":"Noel Cassar, Paul Cromwell, Sinead Duggan, Charlotte van Veldhuisen, Marja Boermeester, Marc Besselink, Kevin Conlon","doi":"10.1159/000535588","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000535588","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Debate exists regarding the optimal treatment for painful chronic pancreatitis (CP). This meta-analysis aims to determine the outcomes of surgical intervention as compared to endoscopy in patients with painful CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Databases (1995 onwards) was done by two independent reviewers using PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome was pain relief.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8,479 studies, three were randomized trials, comprising a total of 199 patients. Compared with endoscopy, surgery was associated with a lower Izbicki score, both at medium term (mean difference (MD) 21.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.48-29.43, p < 0.00001) and long term (MD: 17.80, 95% CI: 8.36-27.23, p = 0.0002). A higher proportion of surgical patients had some sort of pain relief compared with those who had endoscopy, both at medium term (72% vs. 46%, RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.90, p = 0.0006) and long term (73% vs. 47%, RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.19-1.89, p = 0.0007). Complete pain relief was more common in the surgical group compared to the endoscopy group, both at medium term (33% vs. 17%, RR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.16-3.36, p = 0.01) and long term (35% vs. 18%, RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.15-3.20, p = 0.01). The pooled crossover rate from endoscopy to surgery was 22% (22/99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical treatment in patients with painful CP leads to better pain control, requiring fewer interventions as compared to endoscopic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139402283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The usefulness of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetate acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) in assessing the functional future remnant liver volume (fFRLV) to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) has been previously reported. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of this technique in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a major portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).
Methods: This study included 21 patients with PVTT in the ipsilateral first-order branch (Vp3) and 30 patients with PVTT in the main trunk/contralateral branch (Vp4). To evaluate fFRLV, the signal intensity (SI) of the remnant liver was determined on T1-weighted images, using both conventional and newly developed methods. The fFRLV was calculated using the SI of the remnant liver and muscle, remnant liver volume, and body surface area. Preoperative factors predicting PHLF (≥grade B) in HCC patients with Vp3/4 PVTT were evaluated.
Results: In the Vp3 group, we found fFRLV area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) above 0.70 (AUC = 0.875, 0.750) using EOB-MRI results calculated using either the plot or whole method. None of the parameters in the Vp4 group had an AUC greater than 0.70.
Conclusion: The fFRLV calculated by EOB-MRI using the whole method can be as useful as the conventional method in predicting PHLF (≥grade B) for HCC patients with Vp3 PVTT.
{"title":"A Novel Method Using Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetate Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with a Major Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus.","authors":"Kosuke Nishio, Shohei Komatsu, Keitaro Sofue, Masahiro Kido, Kaori Kuramitsu, Hidetoshi Gon, Kenji Fukushima, Takeshi Urade, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Hirochika Toyama, Takumi Fukumoto","doi":"10.1159/000536157","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000536157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The usefulness of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetate acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) in assessing the functional future remnant liver volume (fFRLV) to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) has been previously reported. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of this technique in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a major portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 21 patients with PVTT in the ipsilateral first-order branch (Vp3) and 30 patients with PVTT in the main trunk/contralateral branch (Vp4). To evaluate fFRLV, the signal intensity (SI) of the remnant liver was determined on T1-weighted images, using both conventional and newly developed methods. The fFRLV was calculated using the SI of the remnant liver and muscle, remnant liver volume, and body surface area. Preoperative factors predicting PHLF (≥grade B) in HCC patients with Vp3/4 PVTT were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Vp3 group, we found fFRLV area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) above 0.70 (AUC = 0.875, 0.750) using EOB-MRI results calculated using either the plot or whole method. None of the parameters in the Vp4 group had an AUC greater than 0.70.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fFRLV calculated by EOB-MRI using the whole method can be as useful as the conventional method in predicting PHLF (≥grade B) for HCC patients with Vp3 PVTT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139466226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}