Pub Date : 2025-01-18DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.022
Aman Advani, Kuldeep Deewan , Aadtiya Odhwani, Kunal Kumar
{"title":"Comment on: “Analysis of exposome and genetic variability suggests stress as a major contributor for development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma”","authors":"Aman Advani, Kuldeep Deewan , Aadtiya Odhwani, Kunal Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"57 3","pages":"Pages 804-805"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Author's Reply: Comment on “Analysis of exposome and genetic variability suggests stress as a major contributor for development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma”","authors":"Giulia Peduzzi , Alessio Felici , Roberto Pellungrini , Riccardo Farinella , Daniele Campa","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"57 3","pages":"Pages 806-807"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by several prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage, patient's health, liver function and specific characteristics of each intervention. The interplay between these factors should be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary tumor board. To support this, the novel "multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy" (MTH) concept has been recently proposed. This review will present the main features of available surgical treatments for HCC (liver transplantation, liver resection, ablation). Strengths and weaknesses are reported in the light of clinical decision making and of treatment allocation, with a special focus on the collocation of each treatment in the MTH framework and on how MTH may be useful in supporting clinical decision. Sequential treatments and their role to allow further surgical treatments will also be analyzed.
{"title":"Hepatocellular carcinoma: Revising the surgical approach in light of the concept of multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy.","authors":"Umberto Cillo, Enrico Gringeri, Francesco Enrico D'Amico, Jacopo Lanari, Alessandro Furlanetto, Alessandro Vitale","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by several prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage, patient's health, liver function and specific characteristics of each intervention. The interplay between these factors should be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary tumor board. To support this, the novel \"multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy\" (MTH) concept has been recently proposed. This review will present the main features of available surgical treatments for HCC (liver transplantation, liver resection, ablation). Strengths and weaknesses are reported in the light of clinical decision making and of treatment allocation, with a special focus on the collocation of each treatment in the MTH framework and on how MTH may be useful in supporting clinical decision. Sequential treatments and their role to allow further surgical treatments will also be analyzed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Immune-related sclerosing cholangitis (irSC) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is relatively rare, and its clinical and pathological features are not well known.
Aims: We aimed to compare the clinical course and pathological findings of irSC with those of non-irSC liver injury.
Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 2416 patients with advanced malignancies treated with ICIs between September 2014 and October 2023. The data of patients with severe ICI-induced liver injury who underwent liver biopsy were analyzed and compared between patients with irSC and non-irSC.
Results: Ninety-three (3.8 %) patients had severe ICI-induced liver injury, and 38 underwent liver biopsy. Of these, five were diagnosed with irSC. The irSC group had a significantly longer time to onset of ICI-induced liver injury and a lower rate of improvement of liver injury than did the non-irSC group (irSC, 3/5; non-irSC, 32/33). Liver biopsies revealed more moderate-to-severe pathological cholangitis in the irSC group than in the non-irSC group (irSC, n = 5/5; non-irSC, n = 16/33). Other pathological findings were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: Appropriate management of irSC requires an understanding of its characteristics of late onset and steroid resistance, and liver biopsy, in addition to imaging, may be useful for diagnosing irSC.
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)诱导的免疫相关性硬化性胆管炎(irSC)较为罕见,其临床和病理特征尚不清楚。目的:我们旨在比较irSC与非irSC肝损伤的临床过程和病理表现。方法:回顾性收集2014年9月至2023年10月2416例接受ICIs治疗的晚期恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料。对重度ici肝损伤患者行肝活检的数据进行分析,比较irSC和非irSC患者的数据。结果:重度肝损伤93例(3.8%),行肝活检38例。其中,5人被诊断为irSC。与非irSC组相比,irSC组出现ici性肝损伤的时间明显更长,肝损伤的改善率明显较低(irSC, 3/5;non-irSC, 32/33)。肝脏活检显示,irSC组中重度病理性胆管炎发生率高于非irSC组(irSC, n = 5/5;非irsc, n = 16/33)。两组其他病理结果相似。结论:irSC的适当治疗需要了解其晚发和类固醇抵抗的特点,肝脏活检和影像学检查可能对irSC的诊断有用。
{"title":"Clinical features and pathological findings by liver biopsy in patients with immune-related sclerosing cholangitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Tsukasa Yasuda, Takanori Ito, Takuya Ishikawa, Kazuyuki Mizuno, Takafumi Yamamoto, Shinya Yokoyama, Kenta Yamamoto, Norihiro Imai, Yoji Ishizu, Takashi Honda, Yuichi Koshiyama, Satoshi Yasuda, Hidenori Toyoda, Yuichi Ando, Yoshie Shimoyama, Hiroki Kawashima","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2025.01.037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2025.01.037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune-related sclerosing cholangitis (irSC) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is relatively rare, and its clinical and pathological features are not well known.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to compare the clinical course and pathological findings of irSC with those of non-irSC liver injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 2416 patients with advanced malignancies treated with ICIs between September 2014 and October 2023. The data of patients with severe ICI-induced liver injury who underwent liver biopsy were analyzed and compared between patients with irSC and non-irSC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three (3.8 %) patients had severe ICI-induced liver injury, and 38 underwent liver biopsy. Of these, five were diagnosed with irSC. The irSC group had a significantly longer time to onset of ICI-induced liver injury and a lower rate of improvement of liver injury than did the non-irSC group (irSC, 3/5; non-irSC, 32/33). Liver biopsies revealed more moderate-to-severe pathological cholangitis in the irSC group than in the non-irSC group (irSC, n = 5/5; non-irSC, n = 16/33). Other pathological findings were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Appropriate management of irSC requires an understanding of its characteristics of late onset and steroid resistance, and liver biopsy, in addition to imaging, may be useful for diagnosing irSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-18DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.021
Carlos González-Alayón, Manuel Hernández-Guerra, Sergio Luis-Lima, Esteban Porrini
{"title":"Measured GFR redefined with dried-blood spot: Simplicity with reliability.","authors":"Carlos González-Alayón, Manuel Hernández-Guerra, Sergio Luis-Lima, Esteban Porrini","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.019
Giovanni Barbara , Massimo Bellini , Piero Portincasa , Vincenzo Stanghellini , Bruno Annibale , Antonio Benedetti , Giovanni Cammarota , Walter Fries , Paola Usai Satta , Enrico Stefano Corazziari
Bile Acid Diarrhea (BAD) is a common cause of chronic diarrhea, often accompanied by urgency, occasional fecal incontinence, abdominal pain, and fatigue. A nationwide survey has shown limited awareness of BAD within the Italian medical community, prompting a panel of experts to develop a Position Paper that outlines the most practical and cost-saving diagnostic investigations and treatments for this frequently overlooked condition. The document provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and classification of the different types of Bile Acid Diarrhea (BAD). A key focus is the diagnostic approach to identifying and managing the many undiagnosed BAD patients in both primary care and specialized medical settings. Finally, the paper addresses the optimal therapeutic strategies for BAD, including traditional bile acid sequestrants and newer, promising treatments.
{"title":"Bile acid diarrhea in patients with chronic diarrhea. Current appraisal and recommendations for clinical practice","authors":"Giovanni Barbara , Massimo Bellini , Piero Portincasa , Vincenzo Stanghellini , Bruno Annibale , Antonio Benedetti , Giovanni Cammarota , Walter Fries , Paola Usai Satta , Enrico Stefano Corazziari","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bile Acid Diarrhea (BAD) is a common cause of chronic diarrhea, often accompanied by urgency, occasional fecal incontinence, abdominal pain, and fatigue. A nationwide survey has shown limited awareness of BAD within the Italian medical community, prompting a panel of experts to develop a Position Paper that outlines the most practical and cost-saving diagnostic investigations and treatments for this frequently overlooked condition. The document provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and classification of the different types of Bile Acid Diarrhea (BAD). A key focus is the diagnostic approach to identifying and managing the many undiagnosed BAD patients in both primary care and specialized medical settings. Finally, the paper addresses the optimal therapeutic strategies for BAD, including traditional bile acid sequestrants and newer, promising treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"57 3","pages":"Pages 680-687"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-15DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.01.038
Junke Hu, Guiqin Zhou, Liang Zhang, Xiang-Mei Chen, Liming Qi, Lei Sun
{"title":"Clinicopathological features of porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder with a novel GIMAP5 mutation in a pair of twin siblings.","authors":"Junke Hu, Guiqin Zhou, Liang Zhang, Xiang-Mei Chen, Liming Qi, Lei Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2025.01.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2025.01.038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.014
Stiliano Maimaris, Annalisa Schiepatti, Marco Saracino, Lorenzo Ongarelli, Daniel Ignacio Conforme Torres, Chiara Scarcella, Paolo Minerba, Federico Biagi
Background: In uncertain cases of coeliac disease (CD), gluten challenge (GC) may be necessary to confirm or exclude the diagnosis. However, data on diagnostic outcomes after GC are limited.
Aims: We aimed to evaluate outcomes after GC in patients with unconfirmed CD who had already started a gluten-free diet (GFD), and identify predictors of a confirmed diagnosis.
Methods: Patients with unconfirmed CD already on a GFD, who underwent GC and subsequent testing with endomysial antibodies (EmA) and duodenal biopsy between 06/2000-06/2021 were included. Clinical data, prior test results, and final diagnoses were retrospectively collected and analysed.
Results: 158 patients underwent GC (median duration 3 months, IQR 3-6) and CD was confirmed in 47/158 (29.7 %) (41 conventional CD, 1 CD + IgAdeficiency, 5 potential CD), non-coeliac enteropathies (NCEs) were diagnosed in 3 patients, and enteropathy was ruled out in 108. Prior positive serology strongly predicted CD diagnosis after GC (OR 36.8, 95 %CI 13.8-100.0, p < 0.001), whereas prior reported villous atrophy did not (p = 0.83), as this was frequently (35 %) due to incorrect sampling/interpretation of poorly oriented specimens. Duration of GC was also not associated with diagnostic outcomes (p = 0.37).
Conclusion: Prior positive serology strongly predicted CD diagnosis after GC, while histological results without positive serology should be interpreted cautiously. Clinicians should consider NCEs in older patients with severe symptoms.
背景:在不确定的乳糜泻(CD)病例中,谷蛋白激发(GC)可能需要确认或排除诊断。然而,GC后诊断结果的数据有限。目的:我们旨在评估已经开始无谷蛋白饮食(GFD)的未确诊乳糜泻患者GC后的结果,并确定确诊的预测因素。方法:纳入在2000年6月至2021年6月期间接受GC和随后的肌内膜抗体(EmA)检测和十二指肠活检的未确诊CD患者。回顾性收集和分析临床资料、既往检查结果和最终诊断。结果:158例患者行GC(中位病程3个月,IQR 3-6), 47/158例(29.7%)确诊为CD(常规CD 41例,CD + iga缺乏症1例,潜在CD 5例),3例诊断为非乳糜泻性肠病(NCEs), 108例排除肠病。先前的血清学阳性强烈预测GC后的CD诊断(OR 36.8, 95% CI 13.8-100.0, p < 0.001),而先前报告的绒毛萎缩没有(p = 0.83),因为这经常是(35%)由于不正确的采样/解释不明确的标本。GC持续时间也与诊断结果无关(p = 0.37)。结论:既往血清学阳性对GC后CD的诊断有较强的预测作用,而无血清学阳性的组织学结果应谨慎解释。临床医生应考虑有严重症状的老年患者的nce。
{"title":"Diagnostic outcomes after gluten challenge in adult patients with unconfirmed coeliac disease already on a gluten-free diet: A 20-year retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Stiliano Maimaris, Annalisa Schiepatti, Marco Saracino, Lorenzo Ongarelli, Daniel Ignacio Conforme Torres, Chiara Scarcella, Paolo Minerba, Federico Biagi","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In uncertain cases of coeliac disease (CD), gluten challenge (GC) may be necessary to confirm or exclude the diagnosis. However, data on diagnostic outcomes after GC are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to evaluate outcomes after GC in patients with unconfirmed CD who had already started a gluten-free diet (GFD), and identify predictors of a confirmed diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with unconfirmed CD already on a GFD, who underwent GC and subsequent testing with endomysial antibodies (EmA) and duodenal biopsy between 06/2000-06/2021 were included. Clinical data, prior test results, and final diagnoses were retrospectively collected and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>158 patients underwent GC (median duration 3 months, IQR 3-6) and CD was confirmed in 47/158 (29.7 %) (41 conventional CD, 1 CD + IgAdeficiency, 5 potential CD), non-coeliac enteropathies (NCEs) were diagnosed in 3 patients, and enteropathy was ruled out in 108. Prior positive serology strongly predicted CD diagnosis after GC (OR 36.8, 95 %CI 13.8-100.0, p < 0.001), whereas prior reported villous atrophy did not (p = 0.83), as this was frequently (35 %) due to incorrect sampling/interpretation of poorly oriented specimens. Duration of GC was also not associated with diagnostic outcomes (p = 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior positive serology strongly predicted CD diagnosis after GC, while histological results without positive serology should be interpreted cautiously. Clinicians should consider NCEs in older patients with severe symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.023
C. Spada , D. Salvi , C. Ferrari , C. Hassan , F. Barbaro , N. Belluardo , L. Minelli Grazioli , S.M. Milluzzo , N. Olivari , L.G. Papparella , S. Pecere , E.V. Pesatori , L. Petruzziello , S. Piccirelli , A. Quadarella , P. Cesaro , G. Costamagna
Background and aims
Adenoma detection rate (ADR) serves as a primary quality metric in colonoscopy. Various computer-aided detection (CADe) tools have emerged, yielding diverse impacts on ADR across different demographic cohorts. This study aims to evaluate a new CADe system in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Methods
This is an Italian multicenter randomized control trial (RCT) that included patients aged 40–85 scheduled for screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy randomly assigned to CADe or standard colonoscopy (SC). Patients with a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale < 2 in any segment were excluded. The primary outcome was ADR in both groups. Secondary outcomes included adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), polyp per colonoscopy (PPC) and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR).
Results
1228 patients were enrolled of whom 70 were excluded for inadequate bowel cleansing or missed cecal intubation. Therefore, 1158 subjects (578 CADe vs 580 SC) were included in the final analysis. ADR was significantly higher in CADe than in the control group (50.2 % vs 40.5 %, p = 0.001). CADe also significantly increased PPC and APC (1.64 ± 2.03 vs 1.23 ± 1.72, p < 0.001; 1.16 ± 1.82 vs 0.80 ± 1.46 p < 0.001; respectively). No significant differences were found in SSLDR between CADe and SC (12.1 % vs 11.0 %, p = 0.631).
Conclusions
The results of this RCT indicate that AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR in a non-selected population undergoing colonoscopy without causing any significant delay in procedure time or increasing the detection of nonneoplastic lesions. (Ethical committee approval: NCT 05862948).
背景和目的:腺瘤检出率(ADR)是结肠镜检查的主要质量指标。各种计算机辅助检测(CADe)工具已经出现,对不同人群的不良反应产生了不同的影响。本研究旨在评估一种新的CADe系统在结肠镜检查患者中的应用。方法:这是一项意大利多中心随机对照试验(RCT),纳入40-85岁计划进行筛查、监测或诊断性结肠镜检查的患者,随机分配到CADe或标准结肠镜检查(SC)组。排除波士顿肠准备评分在任何节段均< 2的患者。两组的主要结局均为不良反应。次要结果包括腺瘤单次结肠镜检查(APC)、息肉单次结肠镜检查(PPC)和无根状病变检出率(SSLDR)。结果:纳入1228例患者,其中70例因肠道清洁不足或遗漏盲肠插管而被排除。因此,1158名受试者(578名CADe vs 580名SC)被纳入最终分析。CADe组不良反应显著高于对照组(50.2% vs 40.5%, p = 0.001)。CADe也显著提高PPC和APC(1.64±2.03 vs 1.23±1.72,p < 0.001);1.16±1.82 vs 0.80±1.46 p < 0.001;分别)。CADe组和SC组的SSLDR无显著差异(12.1% vs 11.0%, p = 0.631)。结论:本随机对照试验的结果表明,人工智能辅助结肠镜检查显著改善了非选择性结肠镜检查人群的不良反应,而不会造成任何明显的手术时间延迟或增加非肿瘤性病变的检测。(伦理委员会批准号:NCT05862948)。
{"title":"A comprehensive RCT in screening, surveillance, and diagnostic AI-assisted colonoscopies (ACCENDO-Colo study)","authors":"C. Spada , D. Salvi , C. Ferrari , C. Hassan , F. Barbaro , N. Belluardo , L. Minelli Grazioli , S.M. Milluzzo , N. Olivari , L.G. Papparella , S. Pecere , E.V. Pesatori , L. Petruzziello , S. Piccirelli , A. Quadarella , P. Cesaro , G. Costamagna","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Adenoma detection rate (ADR) serves as a primary quality metric in colonoscopy. Various computer-aided detection (CADe) tools have emerged, yielding diverse impacts on ADR across different demographic cohorts. This study aims to evaluate a new CADe system in patients undergoing colonoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is an Italian multicenter randomized control trial (RCT) that included patients aged 40–85 scheduled for screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy randomly assigned to CADe or standard colonoscopy (SC). Patients with a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale < 2 in any segment were excluded. The primary outcome was ADR in both groups. Secondary outcomes included adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), polyp per colonoscopy (PPC) and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1228 patients were enrolled of whom 70 were excluded for inadequate bowel cleansing or missed cecal intubation. Therefore, 1158 subjects (578 CADe vs 580 SC) were included in the final analysis. ADR was significantly higher in CADe than in the control group (50.2 % vs 40.5 %, <em>p</em> = 0.001). CADe also significantly increased PPC and APC (1.64 ± 2.03 vs 1.23 ± 1.72, <em>p</em> < 0.001; 1.16 ± 1.82 vs 0.80 ± 1.46 <em>p</em> < 0.001; respectively). No significant differences were found in SSLDR between CADe and SC (12.1 % vs 11.0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.631).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this RCT indicate that AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR in a non-selected population undergoing colonoscopy without causing any significant delay in procedure time or increasing the detection of nonneoplastic lesions. (Ethical committee approval: NCT 05862948).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"57 3","pages":"Pages 762-769"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-13DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.024
Dawei Ding, Gui Jia, Lina Cui, Yansheng Liu, Xiufang Wang, Ruiqing Sun, Juan Deng, Guanya Guo, Yulong Shang, Ying Han
Background: Positivity for anti-gp210 and anti-centromeric antibodies (ACA) in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) have been associated with the progression of liver failure and portal hypertension (PH), respectively. The value of combining risk autoantibody assessments with prognostic scoring systems in improving risk assessment in patients with PBC remains unclear.
Aims: To investigate the prognostic significance of various combinations of anti-gp210 and ACA statuses and their enhancing the prognostic utility on the GLOBE scoring system.
Methods: Stepwise Cox regression was used to estimate the relationship between anti-gp210 antibodies or ACA and liver transplant (LT)-free survival. The GLOBE scoring system was used to stratify the patients.
Results: A total of 1412 patients with confirmed PBC were included in the study. The anti-gp210+ status was a significant risk factor for LT/liver-related death, whereas the ACA+ status was a significant risk factor for variceal bleeding (P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). The anti-gp210 + ACA + status was a risk indicator for the entire cohort independent of the GLOBE score (P = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.649, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.492-4.703) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM; P = 0.039, HR: 4.969, 95 % CI: 1.088-22.692). A significant difference was observed in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between the fitted scoring model (consisting of the GLOBE score, anti-gp210 + ACA+ status, and albumin level) and the GLOBE scoring system alone (P = 0.034). When enrolled patients were classified as high-, medium-, and low-risk by the GLOBE scoring system (1.8 and 0.5), the anti-gp210 + ACA+ status was associated with a 1.6- and 3.3-fold higher 5-year incidence of LT/liver-related death in the high- and medium-risk groups, respectively, in comparison with the anti-gp210 + ACA- cases. The anti-gp210 + ACA+ status was also a risk indicator for the presentation of the hepatic failure phenotype in comparison with the anti-gp210- status (P = 0.007, odds ratio [OR]: 6.419, 95 % CI: 1.645-25.042), and the presentation of PH phenotype in comparison with the anti-ACA- status (OR: 3.473, 95 % CI: 1.328-9.018, P = 0.011).
Conclusion: The anti-gp210 + ACA+ status was an independent prognostic marker that could predict a poor prognosis in patients with PBC at diagnosis and may further optimise risk stratification in combination with the GLOBE scoring system.
{"title":"The prognostic value of anti-gp210 and anti-centromere antibodies in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: Enhancing the prognostic utility on the GLOBE scoring system.","authors":"Dawei Ding, Gui Jia, Lina Cui, Yansheng Liu, Xiufang Wang, Ruiqing Sun, Juan Deng, Guanya Guo, Yulong Shang, Ying Han","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positivity for anti-gp210 and anti-centromeric antibodies (ACA) in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) have been associated with the progression of liver failure and portal hypertension (PH), respectively. The value of combining risk autoantibody assessments with prognostic scoring systems in improving risk assessment in patients with PBC remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the prognostic significance of various combinations of anti-gp210 and ACA statuses and their enhancing the prognostic utility on the GLOBE scoring system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stepwise Cox regression was used to estimate the relationship between anti-gp210 antibodies or ACA and liver transplant (LT)-free survival. The GLOBE scoring system was used to stratify the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1412 patients with confirmed PBC were included in the study. The anti-gp210+ status was a significant risk factor for LT/liver-related death, whereas the ACA+ status was a significant risk factor for variceal bleeding (P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). The anti-gp210 + ACA + status was a risk indicator for the entire cohort independent of the GLOBE score (P = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.649, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.492-4.703) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM; P = 0.039, HR: 4.969, 95 % CI: 1.088-22.692). A significant difference was observed in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between the fitted scoring model (consisting of the GLOBE score, anti-gp210 + ACA+ status, and albumin level) and the GLOBE scoring system alone (P = 0.034). When enrolled patients were classified as high-, medium-, and low-risk by the GLOBE scoring system (1.8 and 0.5), the anti-gp210 + ACA+ status was associated with a 1.6- and 3.3-fold higher 5-year incidence of LT/liver-related death in the high- and medium-risk groups, respectively, in comparison with the anti-gp210 + ACA- cases. The anti-gp210 + ACA+ status was also a risk indicator for the presentation of the hepatic failure phenotype in comparison with the anti-gp210- status (P = 0.007, odds ratio [OR]: 6.419, 95 % CI: 1.645-25.042), and the presentation of PH phenotype in comparison with the anti-ACA- status (OR: 3.473, 95 % CI: 1.328-9.018, P = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anti-gp210 + ACA+ status was an independent prognostic marker that could predict a poor prognosis in patients with PBC at diagnosis and may further optimise risk stratification in combination with the GLOBE scoring system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142982963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}